NICKEL BASE SUPERALLOY FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
20230147621 · 2023-05-11
Assignee
Inventors
- Kevin Minet-Lallemand (Turku, FI)
- Ilkka Miettunen (Turku, FI)
- Ville Niemelae (Turku, FI)
- Kristiina Kupi (Turku, FI)
- Abdul Shaafi Shaikh (Turku, FI)
Cpc classification
B33Y10/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22F10/28
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B33Y70/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C22C19/055
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B22F10/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Y02P10/25
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
Abstract
The present invention concerns nickel alloys in powder form comprising at least 40 wt.-% Ni, about 20.0 to 25.0 wt.-% Cr, about 5.0 to 25.0 wt.-% Co and about 1.5 to 5.0 wt.-% Ti, which have a content of B in an amount of less than 40 ppmw. Corresponding alloys have the advantage of providing minimal or no micro-cracks as well as an improved ductility in creep conditions compared to similar alloys having a higher content of B, when the alloys are processed by additive manufacturing to prepare three-dimensional objects. The present invention further concerns processes and devices for the preparation of three-dimensional objects from such nickel alloy powders, processes for the preparation of corresponding nickel alloy powders, three-dimensional objects which are prepared from such nickel alloy powders and the use of such nickel alloy powders to minimize and/or suppress micro-crack formation and/or to provide improved creep ductility.
Claims
1. Nickel alloy in powder form comprising at least 40 wt.-% Ni, about 20.0 to 25.0 wt.-% Cr, about 5.0 to 25.0 wt.-% Co and about 1.5 to 5.0 wt.-% Ti, characterised in that the alloy contains B in an amount of less than 40 ppmw.
2. Nickel alloy in powder form according to claim 1, which comprises about 22.0 to 23.0 wt.-% Cr, about 18.0 to 20.0 wt.-% Co and about 3.0 to 4.5 wt.-% Ti.
3. Nickel alloy in powder form according to claim 1, further comprising one or more of at least 1,5 and/or up to 2.5 wt.-% W, at least 1.5 and/or up to 2.5 wt.-% Al, at least 1.0 and/or up to 1.5 wt.-% Ta and at least 0.8 and/or up to 1.2 wt.-% Nb and optionally up to 0.17 wt.-% C and/or up to 0.12 wt.-% Zr.
4. Nickel alloy in powder form according to claim 1, comprising less than or equal to 35 ppmw B.
5. Nickel alloy in powder form according to claim 1 comprising at least 42 and/or up to 55 wt.-% Ni.
6. Nickel alloy in powder form according to claim 1, wherein the powder has a particle size d50 of from 2 to 200 μm as determined according to ISO 13320 by laser scattering or laser diffraction.
7. Process for the manufacture of a three-dimensional object, comprising providing a nickel alloy in powder form as defined in claim 1, and preparing the object by applying the nickel alloy in powder form layer on layer and selectively solidifying the alloy powder at positions in each layer, which correspond to the cross section of the object in this layer, wherein the positions are scanned with a radiation interaction zone of an energy beam bundle.
8. Process for the manufacture of a three-dimensional object according to claim 7, wherein the nickel alloy in powder form prior to solidifying is heated to a temperature of 100° C. or more.
9. Process for the manufacture of a three-dimensional object according to claim 7, further including a step of subjecting the three-dimensional object initially prepared to a heat treatment, and/or for a time of 3 to 15 h.
10. Process for the preparation of a nickel alloy in powder for use in a process according to claim 7, wherein the nickel alloy is atomized in an appropriate device.
11. Three dimensional object prepared according to the process as described in claim 10, and wherein the three dimensional object comprises or consists of the nickel alloy.
12. Three dimensional object according to claim 11, wherein the three dimensional object is a gas turbine component.
13. Use of a nickel alloy in powder form according to claim 1 for minimizing and/or suppressing crack formation in a three-dimensional object and/or for providing improved ductility in creep conditions of the three-dimensional object, wherein the three-dimensional object is prepared in a process involving the step and layerwise build-up of the three dimensional object by additive manufacturing.
14. Device for implementing a process according to claim 7, wherein the device comprises a radiation source, a process chamber having an open container with a container wall, a support, which is inside the process chamber, wherein process chamber and support are moveable against each other in vertical direction, a storage container and a recoater, which is moveable in horizontal direction, and wherein the storage container is at least partially filled with a nickel alloy in powder form.
Description
[0037]
[0038]
[0039] The device represented in
[0040] In
[0041] The device in
[0042] The device in
[0043] According to the invention, a nickel alloy in powder form is used as building material 15.
[0044] According to the embodiments described below, the nickel alloy powder is processed by the direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) method. In the selective laser sintering or selective laser melting method small portions of a whole volume of powder required for manufacturing an object are heated up simultaneously to a temperature which allows a sintering and/or melting of these portions. This way of manufacturing an object can typically be characterized as a continuous and/or—on a micro-level—frequently gradual process, whereby the object is acquired through a multitude of heating cycles of small powder volumes. Solidification of these small powder portions is carried through selectively, i.e. at selected positions of a powder reservoir, which positions correspond to portions of an object to be manufactured. As in selective laser sintering or selective laser melting the process of solidification is usually carried through layer by layer, where the solidified powder in each layer is identical with a cross-section of the object that is to be built. Due to the small volume or mass of powder which is solidified in a given time span, e.g. 1 mm.sup.3 per second or less, and due to conditions in a process chamber of such additive manufacturing machines, which can favour a rapid cool-down below a critical temperature, the material normally solidifies quickly after heating.
[0045] In conventional sintering and casting methods one and the same portion of building material is heated up to a required temperature at the same time. A whole portion of material required to generate an object is cast into a mould in a liquid form. This volume of building material is therefore held above a temperature level required for melting or sintering for a much longer time compared to the selective laser sintering or selective laser melting method. Large volumes of hot material lead to a low cooling rate and a slow solidification process of the building material after heating. In other words, selective laser sintering or selective laser melting methods can be differentiated from conventional sintering and casting methods by processing of smaller volumes of building material, faster heat cycles and less need for heating up build material with high tolerances for avoiding a premature solidification of the material. These can be counted among the reasons why the amount of energy introduced into the building material for reaching the required temperatures can be controlled more accurately in selective laser sintering or selective laser melting methods. These conditions allow for setting an upper limit of energy input into the powder portions to be processed, which determines a temperature generated in the powder portions, more precisely, that is lower and closer to the melting point of the respective material than in conventional sintering or casting methods.
[0046] In the following, the present invention is further illustrated by mean of examples, which however should not be construed as limiting the invention thereto in any manner.
EXAMPLE 1: PREPARATION OF TEST BODIES FROM A CONVENTIONAL AND INVENTIVE NI ALLOY
[0047] A nickel alloy with the composition Cr: 22.4 wt.-%; Co: 18.9 wt.-%; Ti: 3.7 wt.-%; W 2.0 wt.-%; Nb 1.1 wt.-%; Al 1.9 wt.-%; Ta 1.3 wt.-%, Zr 0.02 wt.-%; C 0.14 wt.-%; and B: 22 ppmw, balance Ni (inventive, sample A) and a nickel alloy with the composition Cr: 22.79 wt.-%; Co: 19.29 wt.-%; Ti: 3.8 wt.-%; W 2.17 wt.-%; Nb 0.93 wt.-%; Al 1.85 wt.-%; Ta 1.41 wt.-%, Zr 0.03 wt.-%; C 0.15 wt.-%; and B: 48 ppmw (reference, sample B) were used as the starting materials. From the materials, test bodies with the dimensions as shown in
[0048] The thus prepared test bodies were investigated for their mechanical properties. Stress testing was performed at 816° C. using an Instron 5982 electromechanical machine equipped with a SF16 furnace and an Instron 7361C extensometer (gauge length 12.5 mm). Temperature was measured by a Type-K thermocouple attached to the specimen and kept within ±2° C. during the tests. The control mode during the testing was at constant speed of the cross head of the machine, the strain was measured with an axial extensometer up to 5% total strain when the extensometer was removed. After 5% total strain the extension of the cross-head was used for the recalculation of the strain and strain rate. For each material, three different nominal strain rates were used: 8×10.sup.−3, 1×10.sup.−5 and 1×10.sup.−6 s.sup.−1.
[0049] In this test series all samples failed before 5% elongation which means that all measured strains correspond to the strain measured by the axial extensometer attached to the samples. While the machine is controlled by a constant cross head speed, the true strain is measured by the axial extensometer. This gave some differences between the true strain rate and the intended nominal strain rate.
[0050] The results of the measurement are provided in table 1 below:
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Diam- E-mod- Elonga- eter strain rate ulus Rp0.2 Rm tion Sample ID [mm] [1/s] [GPa] [MPa] [MPa] [%] sample A#1 5.22 6.90E−03 135 697 834.5 4.9 sample A#2 5.175 9.30E−06 140 394 481.5 3.4 sample A#3 5.21 8.50E−07 85 300 379 2.3 sample B#1 5.22 7.10E−03 144 698 848.5 4 sample B#1 5.22 8.00E−06 95 402 471.2 1.9 sample B#1 5.17 7.10E−07 100 330 368 1.1
[0051] As is apparent from the above table, the flow stress decreases with decreasing strain rate. This can be attributed to the creep effect during slow strain rate testing. Also, the elongation at fracture decreases with decreasing strain rate, which may be attributable to more accumulated creep damage during tests with lower strain rates. Finally, when comparing the samples A at comparable strain rates, the elongation at fracture is lower for the non-inventive samples B than for the inventive samples A. In micrographs of crosscuts of test bodies prepared from non-inventive samples a number of microcracks could be observed, which were not present in crosscuts of corresponding test bodies prepared from inventive samples.
[0052] On comparison of test bodies prepared from the inventive nickel alloy by additive manufacturing with test bodies which were prepared from conventional IN939 by means of casting, the performance in the stress strain behaviours was found to be comparable.
LIST OF REFERENCE SIGNS
[0053] 1 laser sintering or laser meting apparatus [0054] 2 three-dimensional object [0055] 3 process chamber [0056] 4 chamber wall [0057] 5 container [0058] 6 container wall [0059] 7 working plane [0060] 8 building area [0061] 10 support [0062] 11 base plate [0063] 12 building platform [0064] 13 building material [0065] 14 storage container [0066] 15 building material [0067] 16 recoater [0068] 17 radiation heater [0069] 20 irradiation device [0070] 21 laser [0071] 22 laser beam [0072] 23 deflecting device [0073] 24 focusing device [0074] 25 entrance window [0075] 29 control unit