Motorcycle tire for running on rough terrain
11648803 · 2023-05-16
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B60C11/1369
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/033
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/11
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2200/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60C11/11
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A tire has a block pattern. The block pattern includes a plurality of linked block pairs. Each linked block pair includes two blocks 28 and a tie bar 30 interposed between the two blocks 28 and linking the two blocks 28 together. The tie bar 30 has a toe end 40 having a height equal to or smaller than a height of the blocks 28 and a heel end 38 having a height smaller than the height of the toe end 40.
Claims
1. A motorcycle tire for running on rough terrain, comprising a tread having a block pattern, wherein the block pattern includes: a sea; a plurality of blocks, each block rising from the sea and having a land; and a plurality of tie bars, each tie bar rising from the sea, a plurality of block pairs are formed in the block pattern, each block pair including two adjacent ones of the plurality of blocks, where the two adjacent ones are arranged side by side in a tire axial direction, the block pairs include a plurality of linked block pairs, each linked block pair includes two of the plurality of blocks and one of the plurality of tie bars, the tie bar of the linked block pair being interposed between the two blocks and linking the two blocks together, and the tie bar of the linked block pair has a toe end edge having a height equal to or smaller than a height of the blocks and a heel end edge having a height smaller than the height of the toe end edge.
2. The tire according to claim 1, wherein one of the tie bars has a height that continuously increases from the heel end edge toward the toe end edge.
3. The tire according to claim 1, wherein a line connecting the heel end edge and the toe end edge forms an angle of 2° or more with a circumferential direction of the tire.
4. The tire according to claim 1, wherein a ratio H2/Hb in one of the linked block pairs is 0.20 or more and 0.95 or less, wherein H2 represents the height of the toe end edge and Hb represents the height of the blocks.
5. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the tread includes: a crown zone located in a center of the tread in the axial direction of the tire; a pair of middle zones, each middle zone being located outward of the crown zone in the axial direction; and a pair of shoulder zones, each shoulder zone being located outward of the middle zones in the axial direction, and a ratio N1/N in the crown zone is 0.10 or more, wherein N1 represents the number of the linked block pairs in which the height of the toe end edge is greater than the height of the heel end edge and N represents the number of all the block pairs.
6. The tire according to claim 1, wherein a land ratio in the block pattern is 13% or more and 60% or less.
7. The tire according to claim 1, wherein a JIS-A hardness of one of the linked block pairs is 45 or more and 88 or less.
8. The tire according to claim 1, wherein the tire is mounted on a front rim of a motorcycle.
9. A motorcycle tire for running on rough terrain, comprising a tread having a block pattern, wherein the block pattern includes: a sea; a plurality of blocks, each block rising from the sea and having a land; and a plurality of tie bars, each tie bar rising from the sea, a plurality of block pairs are formed in the block pattern, each block pair including two adjacent ones of the plurality of blocks, where the two adjacent ones are arranged side by side in a tire axial direction, the block pairs include a plurality of linked block pairs, each linked block pair includes two of the plurality of blocks and one of the plurality of tie bars, the tie bar of the linked block pair being interposed between the two blocks and linking the two blocks together, and the tie bar of the linked block pair has a toe end having a height equal to or smaller than a height of the blocks and a heel end having a height smaller than the height of the toe end, wherein one of the tie bars has a height that continuously increases all the way from the heel end toward the toe end.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(7) The following will describe in detail the present invention based on preferred embodiments with appropriate reference to the drawings.
(8)
(9) The tread 4 is shaped to project outward in the radial direction. The tread 4 is constituted by a base 18 and a cap 20. The base 18 is made of a crosslinked rubber. The cap 20 is located outward of the base 18 in the radial direction. The cap 20 is made of a crosslinked rubber.
(10) Each sidewall 6 extends substantially inward in the radial direction from the edge of the tread 4. The sidewall 6 is made of a crosslinked rubber. The sidewall 6 is elastically deformable to absorb shock applied from the ground surface. Further, the sidewall 6 prevents external damage to the carcass 10. In the present embodiment, the material of the sidewall 6 is the same as the material of the base 18. The sidewall 6 and the base 18 are integrally formed.
(11) Each bead 8 is located substantially inward of the sidewall 6 in the radial direction. The bead 8 includes a core 22 and an apex 24 extending outward in the radial direction from the core 22. The core 22 is ring-shaped. In the core 22, a non-stretchable wire is wound in a plurality of turns. A typical material of the non-stretchable wire is steel. The apex 24 is tapered outward in the radial direction. The apex 24 is made of a high-hardness crosslinked rubber.
(12) The carcass 10 extends on and between the two opposite beads 8 and lies along the inner sides of the tread 4 and sidewalls 6. The carcass 10 is layered on the inner liner 16. The carcass 10 is turned up around each core 22 from inside to outside in the axial direction. The carcass 10 includes a single ply. The carcass 10 may include two or more plies.
(13) Although not illustrated, the carcass 10 includes a large number of cords aligned with one another and a topping rubber. The cords obliquely intersect the equator plane Eq. The cords may be substantially perpendicular to the equator plane Eq. The cords are typically made of organic fibers. Preferred examples of the organic fibers include polyester fibers, nylon fibers, rayon fibers, polyethylene naphthalate fibers, and aramid fibers.
(14) The belt 12 is located outward of the carcass 10 in the radial direction. The belt 12 is layered on the carcass 10. The belt 12 reinforces the carcass 10. The belt 12 includes a single layer. The belt 12 may include two or more layers. Although not illustrated, the belt 12 includes a large number of cords aligned with one another and a topping rubber. The cords are inclined with respect to the equator plane Eq. The absolute value of the angle of inclination is 10° or more and 35° or less. The cords are typically made of organic fibers. The material of the cords may be steel.
(15)
(16) In
(17) The tread pattern includes a sea 26 and a plurality of blocks 28. Each block 28 rises from the sea 26. This tread pattern is referred to as a block pattern. The tread pattern further includes a plurality of tie bars 30. Each tie bar 30 rises from the sea 26.
(18) As is apparent from
(19)
(20)
(21) The left block 28a and the right block 28b are adjacent to each other. Any other block 28 is not present between the left and right blocks 28a and 28b. In the present embodiment, as is apparent from
(22) The tie bar 30 is interposed between the left and right blocks 28a and 28b. The tie bar 30 links the left and right blocks 28a and 28b together. In the present embodiment, the tie bar 30 is situated in the equator plane Eq. The tie bar 30 is recessed relative to a plane defined by the two lands 32. In other words, the height of the tie bar 30 is smaller than the height of the blocks 28.
(23) In the present invention, a block pair including two blocks 28 and a tie bar 30 interposed between the two blocks 28 and linking the two blocks 28 together is referred to as a “linked block pair”. The first block pair P1 is a linked block pair. As stated above, the height of the tie bar 30 is smaller than the height of the blocks 28. Thus, in the linked block pair, the land 32 of the left block 28a and the land 32 of the right block 28b are separate from each other.
(24) As stated above, the tie bar 30 links the left and right blocks 28a and 28b together. Thus, excessive deformation of the left block 28a can be prevented by the tie bar 30 and the right block 28b. Further, excessive deformation of the right block 28b can be prevented by the tie bar 30 and the left block 28a. The tie bar 30 can contribute to the stiffness of the linked block pair. In the tire 2 including the linked block pair, the stiffness of the tread 4 is high. When mounted on a drive wheel, the tire 2 can contribute to the traction performance on hard ground surfaces.
(25) As shown in
(26) As shown in
(27) As shown in
(28)
(29) The tie bar 30 has a top surface 36 and a side surface 37 (see also
(30) In
(31)
(32) Upon braking, the motorcycle is decelerated. During deceleration, the load imposed on the tire 2 is low. Further, during deceleration, the peripheral speed of rotation of the tire 2 is lower than the moving speed of the motorcycle. In
(33) Since the height H1 of the heel end 38 is smaller than the height H2 of the toe end 40, the tie bar 30 pushes aside dirt and sand while the tire 2 is rolling. Thus, even in a situation where a force acts in the direction of the arrow A2, the resistance arising from the tie bar 30 is low. The tie bar 30 sufficiently sticks in the ground surface G. This sticking reduces the slip between the tire 2 and the ground surface G. The tire 2 is excellent in grip performance during deceleration (or under low load conditions).
(34) The tie bar 30 in which the height H1 of the heel end 38 is smaller than the height H2 of the toe end 40 is disadvantageous in terms of grip performance during acceleration. A front tire (driven wheel) need not exhibit a great grip force during acceleration. In view of low resistance, a small grip force is preferred during acceleration. When the tire 2 according to the present invention is mounted on a front rim, high grip performance during deceleration and low resistance during acceleration can be achieved.
(35) During acceleration, a rear tire (drive wheel) is subjected to a significantly high load. Thus, the tie bar 30 sufficiently sticks in the ground surface G despite the height H1 of the heel end 38 being smaller than the height H2 of the toe end 40. The tie bar 30 does not significantly deteriorate the grip performance during acceleration. When the tire 2 according to the present invention is mounted on a rear rim, high grip performance during deceleration and high stiffness (traction) during acceleration and steady-speed running can be achieved by the tie bar 30.
(36) In the present embodiment, as is apparent from
(37) In
(38) The difference between the height H2 of the toe end 40 and the height H1 of the heel end 38 (difference H2−H1) is preferably 0.5 mm or more and 10.0 mm or less. The tie bar 30 with the difference H2−H1 in the above range sufficiently pushes aside dirt and sand. In view of this, the difference H2−H1 is more preferably 1.5 mm or more and particularly preferably 2.0 mm or more. The difference H2−H1 is more preferably 8.0 mm or less and particularly preferably 7.0 mm or less. The height H1 is preferably 0.0 mm or more and 15.0 mm or less. The height H2 is preferably 0.5 mm or more and 20.0 mm or less.
(39) The ratio of the height H2 of the toe end 40 to the height Hb of the blocks 28 (ratio H2/Hb) is preferably 0.20 or more and 0.95 or less. The linked block pair with a ratio H2/Hb of 0.20 or more can have sufficient stiffness. In view of this, the ratio H2/Hb is more preferably 0.35 or more and particularly preferably 0.50 or more. When the linked block pair has a ratio H2/Hb of 0.95 or less, both the left block 28a and the right block 28b sufficiently stick in the ground surface. In view of this, the ratio H2/Hb is more preferably 0.80 or less and particularly preferably 0.70 or less.
(40) In
(41) The tread 4 may include a linked block pair in which the height of the toe end 40 is equal to the height of the heel end 38, in addition to the linked block pair in which the height of the toe end 40 is greater than the height of the heel end 38. The tread 4 may include a linked block pair in which the height of the toe end 40 is smaller than the height of the heel end 38. Preferably, the tire 2 satisfies the following expressions.
N1/N≥0.10
N=N1+N2+N3+N4
(42) N1: The number of linked block pairs which are present in the crown zone Zc and in which the height of the toe end 40 is greater than the height of the heel end 38.
(43) N2: The number of linked block pairs which are present in the crown zone Zc and in which the height of the toe end 40 is equal to the height of the heel end 38.
(44) N3: The number of linked block pairs which are present in the crown zone Zc and in which the height of the toe end 40 is smaller than the height of the heel end 38.
(45) N4: The number of block pairs which are present in the crown zone Zc and which are not linked block pairs.
(46) In other words, in the crown zone Zc, the ratio of the number N1 of the linked block pairs in which the height of the toe end 40 is greater than the height of the heel end 38 to the number N of all the block pairs (ratio N1/N) is 0.10 or more. The tire 2 with a ratio N1/N of 0.10 or more is excellent in grip performance during deceleration (or under low load conditions). In view of this, the ratio N1/N is more preferably 0.25 or more and particularly preferably 0.50 or more. The ratio N1/N may be 1.00.
(47) A land ratio in the block pattern is preferably 13% or more and 60% or less. In the tire 2 with a land ratio of 13% or more, the ground contact pressure can be uniformly distributed. In this tire 2, damage to the blocks 28 can be reduced. In view of this, the land ratio is more preferably 14% or more and particularly preferably 15% or more. When the tire 2 with a land ratio of 60% or less rolls on a soft ground surface, the blocks 28 sufficiently stick in the ground surface. In view of this, the land ratio is more preferably 50% or less and particularly preferably 40% or less.
(48) The land ratio is the ratio of the total area of all the lands 32 to the area of an imaginary tread surface. The “imaginary tread surface” refers to a tread surface that the tread 4 would have if the tread 4 was devoid of the sea 26, the tie bars 30, the side surfaces 34, and the side surfaces 37 and consisted entirely of the lands 32.
(49) The hardness of the linked block pair is 45 or more and 88 or less. The linked block pair with the hardness in this range can contribute to grip performance on hard ground surfaces. In view of this, the hardness is more preferably 55 or more and particularly preferably 60 or more. The hardness is more preferably 80 or less and particularly preferably 75 or less. The hardness is measured by pressing a JIS-A hardness scale against the linked block pair. The measurement is performed at a temperature of 25° C.
(50) In the present invention, the dimensions and angles of the components of the tire 2 are measured in a state where the tire 2 is mounted on a normal rim and inflated with air to a normal internal pressure. During the measurement, no load is applied to the tire 2. The term “normal rim” as used herein means a rim specified in a standard on which the tire 2 is based. The “standard rim” in the JATMA standard, the “Design Rim” in the TRA standard, and the “Measuring Rim” in the ETRTO standard are normal rims. The term “normal internal pressure” as used herein means an internal pressure specified in a standard on which the tire 2 is based. The “highest air pressure” in the JATMA standard, the “maximum value” recited in “TIRE LOAD LIMITS AT VARIOUS COLD INFLATION PRESSURES” in the TRA standard, and the “INFLATION PRESSURE” in the ETRTO standard are normal internal pressures.
EXAMPLES
Experiment 1: Front Tires
Example 1
(51) A front tire having the structure as shown in
Examples 2 to 7 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2
(52) Tires of Examples 2 to 7 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 were obtained in the same manner as the tire of Example 1, except the height H1 and the height H2 were as shown in Tables 1 and 2 below.
Examples 8 to 10
(53) The tires of Examples 8 to 10 were obtained in the same manner as the tire of Example 1, except the ratio N1/N was as shown in Table 3 below.
(54) [Sensory Evaluation]
(55) Each tire was inflated with air to an internal pressure of 80 kPa. The tire was mounted on the front rim (WM 1.60) of a commercially-available motorcycle for running on rough terrain (engine: four-stroke engine, displacement: 450 cc). A commercially-available tire was mounted on the rear rim of the motorcycle. The motorcycle was allowed to run on a motocross course having a hard ground surface and a soft ground surface, and evaluation by the rider was made as to grip performance during deceleration and low resistance during acceleration. The results are shown as evaluation scores in Tables 1 to 3 below. A higher score indicates a better performance.
(56) [Overall Evaluation]
(57) The tires were rated according to the following criteria.
(58) A: The score for grip performance during deceleration is 110 or higher, and the score for low resistance during acceleration is higher than for Comparative Example 1.
(59) B: The score for grip performance during deceleration is 101 or higher and less than 110, and the score for low resistance during acceleration is higher than for Comparative Example 1.
(60) C: The score for grip performance during deceleration is 100 or lower.
(61) The results are shown in Tables 1 to 3 below.
(62) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Evaluation Results of Front Tires Example 2 Example 1 Example 3 Example 4 Heel end H1 (mm) 1.0 2.0 3.5 4.5 Toe end H2 (mm) 9.0 8.0 6.5 5.5 θ (deg.) 43 35 19 7 H2/Hb 0.69 0.62 0.50 0.42 N1/N 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Hardness (JIS A) 70 70 70 70 Land ratio (%) 15 15 15 15 Grip performance 116 120 114 111 during deceleration Low resistance 108 110 110 106 during acceleration Overall evaluation A A A A
(63) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Evaluation Results of Front Tires Comp. Comp. Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- ple 5 ple 6 ple 7 ple 1 ple 2 Heel end H1 (mm) 5.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 8.0 Toe end H2 (mm) 5.5 13.0 2.5 5.0 4.0 θ (deg.) 3 45 9 0 −25 H2/Hb 0.42 1.00 0.19 0.38 0.31 N1/N 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.00 Hardness (JIS A) 70 70 70 70 70 Land ratio (%) 15 15 15 15 15 Grip performance 107 102 104 100 80 during deceleration Low resistance 100 110 102 100 90 during acceleration Overall evaluation B B B C C
(64) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Evaluation Results of Front Tires Example 8 Example 9 Example 10 Heel end H1 (mm) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Toe end H2 (mm) 8.0 8.0 8.0 θ (deg.) 35 35 35 H2/Hb 0.62 0.62 0.62 N1/N 1.00 0.50 0.25 Hardness (JIS A) 70 70 70 Land ratio (%) 15 15 15 Grip performance 120 116 107 during deceleration Low resistance 110 108 102 during acceleration Overall evaluation A A B
(65) As shown in Tables 1 to 3, the tires of Examples are rated A or B in the overall evaluation. The evaluation results clearly demonstrate the advantages of the present invention.
Experiment 2 Rear Tires
Example 1
(66) A rear tire having a block pattern identical to the pattern as shown in
Examples 2 to 7 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2
(67) The tires of Examples 2 to 7 and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 were obtained in the same manner as the tire of Example 1, except the height H1 and the height H2 were as shown in Tables 4 and 5 below.
Examples 8 to 10
(68) The tires of Examples 8 to 10 were obtained in the same manner as the tire of Example 1, except the ratio N1/N was as shown in Table 6 below.
(69) [Sensory Evaluation]
(70) Each tire was inflated with air to an internal pressure of 80 kPa. The tire was mounted on the rear rim (WM 2.15) of a commercially-available motorcycle for running on rough terrain (engine: four-stroke engine, displacement: 450 cc). A commercially-available tire was mounted on the front rim of the motorcycle. The motorcycle was allowed to run on a motocross course having a hard ground surface and a soft ground surface, and evaluation by the rider was made as to grip performance during deceleration and traction during acceleration and steady-speed running. The results are shown as evaluation scores in Tables 4 to 6 below. A higher score indicates a better performance.
(71) [Overall Evaluation]
(72) The tires were rated according to the following criteria.
(73) A: The score for grip performance during deceleration is 110 or higher, and the score for traction during acceleration and steady-speed running is 95 or higher.
(74) B: The score for grip performance during deceleration is 101 or higher and lower than 110, and the score for traction during acceleration and steady-speed running is 95 or higher.
(75) C: The score for grip performance during deceleration is 100 or lower.
(76) The results are shown in Tables 4 to 6 below.
(77) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Evaluation Results of Rear Tires Example 2 Example 1 Example 3 Example 4 Heel end H1 (mm) 1.0 3.0 4.5 5.5 Toe end H2 (mm) 11.0 9.0 7.5 6.5 θ (deg.) 28 18 9 3 H2/Hb 0.69 0.56 0.47 0.41 N1/N 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Hardness (JIS A) 70 70 70 70 Land ratio (%) 22 22 22 22 Grip performance 116 120 116 112 during deceleration Traction 100 100 100 100 Overall evaluation A A A A
(78) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Evaluation Results of Rear Tires Comp. Comp. Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- ple 5 ple 6 ple 7 ple 1 ple 2 Heel end H1 (mm) 6.0 6.0 1.0 6.0 9.0 Toe end H2 (mm) 7.0 16.0 2.5 6.0 5.0 θ (deg.) 3 31 4 0 −12 H2/Hb 0.44 1.00 0.16 0.38 0.31 N1/N 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.00 0.00 Hardness (JIS A) 70 70 70 70 70 Land ratio (%) 22 22 22 22 22 Grip performance 110 103 101 100 80 during deceleration Traction 100 100 95 100 102 Overall evaluation A B B C C
(79) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Evaluation Results of Rear Tires Example 8 Example 9 Example 10 Heel end H1 (mm) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Toe end H2 (mm) 9.0 9.0 9.0 θ (deg.) 18 18 18 H2/Hb 0.56 0.56 0.56 N1/N 1.00 0.50 0.25 Hardness (JIS A) 70 70 70 Land ratio (%) 22 22 22 Grip performance 120 117 109 during deceleration Traction 100 100 100 Overall evaluation A A B
(80) As shown in Tables 4 to 6, the tires of Examples are rated A or B in the overall evaluation. The evaluation results clearly demonstrate the advantages of the present invention.
(81) The tire according to the present invention can be mounted on a motorcycle which runs on various kinds of ground surfaces. The foregoing description is given for illustrative purposes, and various modifications can be made without departing from the principles of the present invention.