Wear Prognosis Method And Maintenance Method
20230147600 · 2023-05-11
Inventors
- Sven Paulsen (Bonn-Bad Godesberg, DE)
- Stefan Wagner (Bad Honnef, DE)
- Cyrus Barimani (Konigswinter, DE)
Cpc classification
G01N3/58
PHYSICS
E21C35/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
International classification
E01C23/12
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E21C35/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
Abstract
A wear prognosis method and a maintenance method for an earth working machine are disclosed, along with an apparatus for performing the method. Provision is made that the current wear state of one or more earth working tools is sensed. The residual wear capacity until the wear limit is reached is then ascertained from the current wear state.
Claims
1- 23. (cancelled)
24. A method of determining wear for an earth working machine having at least one earth working tool with a first wear state, the method comprising during an earth working operation of the earth working machine: continuously determining an actual work output of the earth working machine from one or more machine parameters; determining a second wear state of the at least one earth working tool, based on a calculated change in wear from the first wear state corresponding to the continuously determined actual work output and a material property of a corresponding substrate worked since beginning the earth working operation; and predicting a remaining work output until a third wear state of the at least one earth working tool, based on an expected change in wear from the second wear state corresponding to a material property of a substrate yet to be worked during the earth working operation.
25. The method of claim 24, further comprising selectively storing the determined second wear state as the first wear state.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the determined second wear state is stored as the first wear state for a new earth working operation.
27. The method of claim 25, wherein the determined second wear state is stored as the first wear state upon determining a change in substrate to be worked during the earth working operation.
28. The method of claim 24, wherein the at least one earth working tool includes a bit and/or a bit holder.
29. The method of claim 24, during the earth working operation further comprising: continuously determining the material property of the substrate being worked by the earth working machine, and reading out at least one characteristic value from a database, wherein the at least one characteristic value is derived from the determined material property and corresponding to a change in the wear state which is expected for a given work output in the substrate to be worked.
30. The method of claim 29, further comprising: identifying a working area within which two or more earth working machines are being used, wherein a characteristic value for the first one of the earth working machines is derived from a previously produced work output of the first one of the earth working machines and a change in wear state of the at least one earth working tool of the first one of the earth working machines corresponding to the previously produced work output; and wherein the characteristic value for the first one of the earth working machines in the working area is used to determine a remaining work output for a second one of the earth working machines in the working area.
31. The method of claim 24, further comprising: determining a second wear state for each of a plurality of earth working tools of the earth working machine; and determining a remaining work output for the earth working machine based upon each one of the plurality of earth working tools having at least a threshold residual wear capacity.
32. The method of claim 24, further comprising: planning a working process; and determining maintenance intervals for the earth working machine as a function of predicted remaining work output for each of a plurality of earth working tools as a function of the planned working process.
33. The method of claim 24, further comprising: ascertaining a planned route of travel during the earth working operation, and material properties associated with sub-areas to be traversed along the planned route of travel; and predicting a remaining work output until the third wear state of the at least one earth working tool, based on an expected change in wear from the second wear state corresponding to the material properties associated with the sub-areas.
34. A system for determining wear for an earth working machine having at least one earth working tool with a first wear state, the system comprising: a controller configured to continuously ascertain one or more machine parameters of the earth working machine during an earth working operation; and wherein the controller is configured during the earth working operation of the earth working machine to determine an actual work output of the earth working machine from the one or more machine parameters; determine a second wear state of the at least one earth working tool, based on a calculated change in wear from the first wear state corresponding to the continuously determined actual work output and a material property of a corresponding substrate worked since beginning the earth working operation; and predict a remaining work output until a third wear state of the at least one earth working tool, based on an expected change in wear from the second wear state corresponding to a material property of a substrate yet to be worked during the earth working operation.
35. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is further configured to selectively store in a memory the determined second wear state as the first wear state.
36. The system of claim 35, wherein the determined second wear state is stored as the first wear state for a new earth working operation.
37. The system of claim 35, wherein the determined second wear state is stored as the first wear state upon determining a change in substrate to be worked during the earth working operation.
38. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is in mutual communication with the earth working machine via a wireless remote data transfer link.
39. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is further configured during the earth working operation to: continuously determine the material property of the substrate being worked by the earth working machine, and read out at least one characteristic value from a database, said characteristic value derived from the determined material property and corresponding to a change in the wear state which is expected for a given work output in the substrate to be worked.
40. The system of claim 39, wherein the controller is further configured during the earth working operation to: identify a working area within which two or more earth working machines are being used, wherein a characteristic value for the first one of the earth working machines is derived from a previously produced work output of the first one of the earth working machines and a change in wear state of the at least one earth working tool of the first one of the earth working machines corresponding to the previously produced work output, and wherein the characteristic value for the first one of the earth working machines in the working area is used to determine a remaining work output for a second one of the earth working machines in the working area.
41. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is further configured to: determine a second wear state for each of a plurality of earth working tools of the earth working machine; and determine a remaining work output for the earth working machine based upon each one of the plurality of earth working tools having at least a threshold residual wear capacity.
42. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is further configured to: plan a working process; and determine maintenance intervals for the earth working machine as a function of predicted remaining work output for each of a plurality of earth working tools as a function of the planned working process.
43. The system of claim 34, wherein the controller is further configured to: ascertain a planned route of travel during the earth working operation, and material properties associated with sub-areas to be traversed along the planned route of travel; and predict a remaining work output until the third wear state of the at least one earth working tool, based on an expected change in wear from the second wear state corresponding to the material properties associated with the sub-areas.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0032] The invention will be explained in further detail below with reference to an exemplifying embodiment depicted in the drawings, in which:
[0033]
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0040]
[0041] This bit tip 11 is usually soldered onto bit head 12 along a contact surface. A circumferential pull-out groove 13 is recessed into bit head 12. This groove serves as a tool receptacle, such that a removal tool can be set in place and bit 10 can be removed from a bit holder 70.
[0042] Bit shank 15 carries a longitudinally slotted cylindrical clamping sleeve 21. This is held on bit shank 15 in lossproof fashion in the direction of the longitudinal dimension of bit 10, but freely rotatably in the circumferential direction. A wear protection washer 20 is arranged in the region between clamping sleeve 21 and bit head 12. In the installed state, wear protection washer 20 is braced against a countersurface of a bit holder 70 and against bit holder 70, facing away from the underside of bit head 12.
[0043] Bit holder 70 is equipped with a projection 71 into which a bit receptacle 72 in the form of a cylindrical bore is recessed. In this bit receptacle 72, clamping sleeve 21 is held with its external periphery clamped against the inner wall of the bore. Bit receptacle 72 opens into a drift opening 73. Through this, a drift punch (not shown) can be introduced for the purpose of removing bit 10. Said punch acts on the end of bit shank 15 in such a way that bit 10 is pushed out of bit receptacle 72 as the clamping force of clamping sleeve 21 is overcome.
[0044] As is evident from
[0045] Bit holder 70 comprises an insertion projection 75 that is introducible into an insertion receptacle 82 of a base part 80 and can be clamped there by means of a clamping screw 83.
[0046] Clamping screw 83 presses an abutment surface 76 of bit holder 70 onto a support surface 84 of base part 80. Although this is not depicted in further detail in
[0047] Noncontact surveying of bit head 12 is performed in order to ascertain the current wear state of bit 10 installed on the bit holder, a defined point or multiple points of bit head 12 being measured/ascertained as a position value.
[0048] Surveying of a milling drum 35 (see
[0049]
[0050] The contours must be aligned with one another. Because of holder wear or other error sources, unworn contour regions are not necessarily located at the same absolute positions (or relative positions with respect to the drum rotation axis). In order to correlate the contours there is a further need for reference features that are uniquely identifiable, occur in the unworn and worn state, and thus permit alignment and conclusive evaluation. Pull-out groove 13, wear markings 74, wear protection washer 20, or other salient regions that are subject to little or no wear can serve as reference features.
[0051] As illustrated by
[0052] This can easily be done using the position (attachment point TP/attachment line 18), known a priori, at which bit tip 11 attaches to bit head 12 in the unworn state.
[0053] When the measured wear states V1 to V3 are overlaid on the unworn contour of bit head 12, as shown in
[0054] The wear volume that constitutes a position value can thus be compared with a reference value. The reference value can be constituted by a functional relationship or a characteristics diagram, different wear volumes being correlated with associated wear states (for example, A mm.sup.3 of wear volume corresponds to B% wear). From the position, known a priori, of attachment point TP/attachment line 18, the tip wear 16 and head wear 17 can then also be separately ascertained by differentiation. This wear detection process provides the user, for example, with a qualitative statement as to whether bit 10 is still suitable for specific milling tasks. For example, a bit that has not yet reached its wear limit but exhibits some tip wear can no longer be used, for example, for precision milling work.
[0055] In the method according to
[0056]
[0057] The distance from this feature to the position of the free end of bit tip 11 (position value) is then further ascertained. It is then easy to ascertain the longitudinal wear in this manner. If the position of bit tip 11 is known, then once again, as described above, the bit holder wear can also be identified. Alternatively or additionally, as defined in
[0058] Relative measurement using a uniquely identifiable feature as reference point has the advantage that wear detection can be performed even when a reference measurement is not available, for example because the length of the replaced bit 10, or the wear state of bit 10 or of the bit holder, is not known.
[0059]
[0060] Once this relationship is known, the length of bit 10 can be ascertained by measurement/integration of the respectively current head volume. This method requires, however, that bit tip 11 have a cross section that increases in the longitudinal direction of the bit. The integration path is preferably defined so that integration does not occur into the head region even for completely worn-out bits 10, since head erosion distorts the result.
[0061] This method has the advantage of not requiring a reference point that is subject to little wear. Such a reference point sometimes is not present or is very difficult to identify.
[0062] The average between the upper and lower contour line can, for example, be calculated in order to identify the degree of wear asymmetry.
[0063] Asymmetrical wear on bit head 12 can be identified using the same method. Usually, however, an asymmetrically worn bit tip 11 will be accompanied by an asymmetrically worn bit head 12. An analysis of bit tip 11 is thus sufficient.
[0064]
[0065] In order to measure the wear state according to one of the methods described above, a light source 50 and a camera 40 are associated with milling drum 35. Milling drum 35 is shown more clearly in
[0066] It is also conceivable, however, to use the quick-change bit holder system according to
[0067] An optical system, in which an elevation line of the drum surface is respectively surveyed in a kind of “scanning” operation, is used as an apparatus for surveying the bit contours. The measurement principle that can be used here is, for example, a triangulation method in which the drum surface is illuminated, for example, by a light source 50, for example a laser line. When the laser line thereby generated is observed by a camera 40 at a different angle, elevation differences on the drum surface (caused, for example, by bits 10) are evident as shifts of these projection lines. If the angular difference between camera 40 and light source 50 is known, the elevation coordinates can be calculated. By rotating milling drum 35 it is thus possible to create an elevation profile of the drum's enveloping surface, from which profile the contour line of the individual bits 10 can then be read out. A further optical measurement principle for surveying the elevation and/or geometry of bits 10 is the shadow-casting method according to
[0068] The method described with reference to
[0069] They then cast a shadow that can be sensed by camera 40. Bits 10 are guided through the light plane over a specific drum rotation angle until they then sink again below the light plane.
[0070] A reference measurement can be performed with unworn bits 10/bit holders 70. Here the time at which bit 10 passes through the light plane (entry or exit) is sensed, and the associated rotation angle of milling drum 35 is sensed. After operational use, a corresponding measurement is then performed on the partially worn (worn out) bit 10. Because of the reduced length as compared with an unworn system, bit 10 passes through the light plane at a later time, and sinks below it sooner. The corresponding rotation angle of milling drum 35 can then be ascertained as a position value. These rotation angles are then compared with the rotation angles for the unworn system (reference value). A calculation of the wear state can then be made from the angle difference by differentiation, or the rotation angle difference is employed directly as a wear criterion.
[0071] During the milling process, for example in phases during which measurement does not occur, the measurement system is usefully stowed in a corresponding protective apparatus. If a second camera 40 is used, for example, direct surveying of the elevation geometry can be performed without an additional illumination source.
[0072] Alternatively, by correspondingly placing a second camera, additional measurements of the contours can be carried out so that the overall information density is increased and the detection probability for asymmetrical wear states is raised.
[0073] Alternatively, the position of bit tip 11 or the location of the bit head contour can also be sensed in at least one step using other sensor equipment that measures distance (e.g. ultrasonic sensors, proximity switches).
[0074] As already explained in detail above, the following can be ascertained using the measurement methods described above: [0075] 1. The current wear state V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3 of an earth working tool (bit 10), [0076] 2. The wear resulting from comparison of a reference value (bit 10 in the unworn or partially worn state) with the current wear state V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3.
[0077] In order for the wear according to item 2. above to occur, the earth working machine must have produced a certain milling output. This milling output can be measured, for example as a number of tons milled (milled mass), as a milled volume, and/or as a milled distance, etc. The milling output can in particular be ascertained directly on an earth working machine. If the earth working machine is equipped with a measurement system described above, the wear (see 2.) can also be sensed directly and the characteristic value or values can be derived in conjunction with the ascertained milling output.
[0078] Based on the measured current wear state V1, V2, and with a knowledge of the wear limit V3 of bit 10, the residual wear capacity of bit 10 can now be ascertained. For example, if the measured free end of bit tip 11 according to
[0079] The change in wear state is influenced by material properties, for example by the hardness and/or abrasiveness of the milled material. The material properties can be sensed indirectly. For example, samples can be taken (e.g. sample boring operations) in the area to be milled, and can be evaluated.
[0080] It is also conceivable to use existing mining category systems. General hardness and abrasiveness categories are defined for mines (e.g. “hard, non-abrasive,” “moderate, non-abrasive,” “soft, abrasive,” etc.). From these categories, the category matching the planned route of travel can be selected.
[0081] The material properties can also be ascertained by evaluating machine data (e.g. rotation speed of the milling drum, torque, advance, and milling depth), since the material properties correlate directly with these machine data.
[0082] Characteristic values can be ascertained as a function of the milling output and/or the material properties. These characteristic values indicate the change in the wear state which is to be expected for a specific milling output and/or for predefined material properties.
[0083] Based on the residual wear capacity and in consideration of one or more characteristic values, the remaining working output can then be signaled to the machine operator. He can be informed, for example, as to the milling output that can still be produced (e.g. mass or volume of material that can still be milled, number of truckloads that can still be milled, travel distance that can be milled, or milling time).
[0084] If the milling output per unit time for an earth working machine is known, it is also possible in particular to indicate the time remaining until the next tool change. The milling output per unit time can be continuously ascertained on the basis of current machine parameters (advance, milling depth). It can also be previously known based on milling work already carried out at the same location.
[0085]
[0086] These sub-areas F.sub.1, F.sub.2, F.sub.3 are associated in mine maps with hardness and abrasion categories (see above). Before work begins, the measurement system (for example, camera 40) ascertains the current wear state V.sub.1, V.sub.2 and conveys this, as well as the current position of the machine, via a transmission and reception apparatus 61 to an external system unit 60. There, in consideration of the calculated residual wear capacity and of one or more characteristic values, the remaining milling output until the wear limit V3 is reached is ascertained. The characteristic value ideally takes into account the planned route of travel and the various hardness and abrasion categories, associated therewith, in sub-areas F.sub.1, F.sub.2, F.sub.3, as well as the expected wear related to the hardness and abrasion categories. The ascertained working output until the wear limit V3 is reached is signaled back to milling machine 30.
[0087] Milling machine 30 depicted on the right in