TOXICITY EVALUATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION USING THE SAME
20230149930 · 2023-05-18
Inventors
Cpc classification
B01L2200/0647
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01L2300/0893
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01L2400/0487
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01L2300/0816
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01L3/502761
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B01L3/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C12M3/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
Disclosed is a toxicity evaluation system including a chip including a passage, in which a sample flows, and a plurality of recesses provided on the passage, and that traps objects included in the sample, and a pump that injects the sample into the chip. Each of the plurality of recesses has a size, by which one spawn included in the sample is trapped.
Claims
1. A toxicity evaluation system comprising: a chip including: a passage, in which a sample flows; and a plurality of recesses provided on the passage, and configured to trap objects included in the sample; and a pump configured to inject the sample into the chip.
2. The toxicity evaluation system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of recesses has a size, by which one spawn included in the sample is trapped.
3. The toxicity evaluation system of claim 2, wherein an inlet port and an outlet port are formed at one end and an opposite end of the passage.
4. The toxicity evaluation system of claim 3, wherein the passage is a combination of a first passage having a first width and a second passage having a second width, wherein the first width has a size, by which the objects included in the sample flow, and wherein the second width has a size, by which the objects included in the sample is prevented from flowing.
5. The toxicity evaluation system of claim 4, wherein the recesses are provided in a direction that faces the outlet port from the inlet port.
6. The toxicity evaluation system of claim 2, wherein the pump causes the sample to flow in any one of the first direction or the second direction.
7. The toxicity evaluation system of claim 6, wherein the sample is any one of a solution containing the spawns, a solution containing sperms that fertilize the spawns, or a pharmaceutical sample, by which a toxicity is evaluated.
8. A method for performing a toxicological evaluation by using the toxicity evaluation system of claim 2, the method comprising: trapping the spawns in the plurality of recesses by injecting the solution containing the spawns into the chip; and inducing in vitro fertilization by injecting the solution containing the sperms that fertilize the spawns into the chip.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising: injecting a sample for evaluating a toxicity of an organism, on which the in vitro fertilization has been completed, into the passage.
10. The method of claim 9, further comprising: trapping the organism, on which the in vitro fertilization has been completed, by the recesses, by adjusting the pump such that the sample flows in a first direction.
11. The method of claim 9, further comprising: causing the organism, on which the in vitro fertilization has been completed, to escape, by adjusting the pump such that the sample flows in a second direction.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0020] The above and other objects and features will become apparent from the following description with reference to the following figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various figures unless otherwise specified, and wherein:
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0028] The terms used in the specification and the accompanying drawings are provided to easily describe the inventive concept, and the inventive concept is not limited by the terms and the drawings.
[0029] A detailed description of, among the technologies used in the inventive concept, known technologies that are not closely relevant to the spirit of the inventive concept will be omitted.
[0030] Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the inventive concept will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings so that those skilled in the art to which the inventive concept pertains may easily carry out the inventive concept. However, the inventive concept may be implemented in various different forms, and is not limited to the embodiments. Furthermore, in a detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the inventive concept, a detailed description of related known functions or configurations will be omitted when they may make the essence of the inventive concept unclear. In addition, the same reference numerals are used for parts that perform similar functions and operations throughout the drawings.
[0031] The expression of ‘including’ some elements may mean that another element may be further included without being excluded unless there is a particularly contradictory description. In detail, the terms “including” and “having” are used to designate that the features, the numbers, the steps, the operations, the elements, the parts, or combination thereof described in the specification are present, and may be understood that one or more other features, numbers, step, operations, elements, parts, or combinations thereof may be added.
[0032] The terms such as first and second may be used to describe various elements, but the elements are not limited to the terms. The terms may be used only for distinguishing one component from other components. For example, without departing the scope of the inventive concept, a first element may be referred to as a second element, and similarly, a second element may be referred to as a first element.
[0033] The terms of a singular form may include plural forms unless otherwise specified. Furthermore, in the drawings, the shapes and sizes of the elements may be exaggerated for clearer description.
[0034] The term ‘unit’ or ‘module’ used in the entire specification is a unit for processing at least one function or operation, and for example, may refer to a hardware element such as an FPGA or an ASIC. However, the ‘unit’ or the ‘module’ is not limited to software or hardware. The ‘unit’ and “module” may be constituted in a storage medium that may perform addressing, and may be configured to reproduce one or more processors.
[0035] Accordingly, as an example, the ‘unit’ and ‘the module’ may include elements such as software elements, object-oriented software elements, class elements, and task elements, processes, functions, attributes, procedures, sub-routines, segments of a program code, drivers, firmware, micro-codes, circuits, data, a database, data structures, tables, arrays, and parameters. The functions provided by the elements and the ‘units’ and the ‘modules’ may be separately performed by a plurality of elements and ‘units’, and may be integrated with other additional elements, and ‘the unit’ and ‘the module’.
[0036] The inventive concept discloses a Xenopus laevis chip 10 for evaluating external fertilization of a vertebrate, development of an embryo, and a development toxicity. The chip 10 according to the inventive concept may induce fertilization and embryogenesis after trapping an embryo of a single entity level in a 3D chip, and may evaluate a toxicity of a medicine. The chip 10 of the inventive concept may function as an incubator that significantly increases a probability of fertilization in a process of performing external fertilization of eyes or embryos. Furthermore, the inventive concept may supply sperms, therapeutic substances, or biomolecules at a uniform velocity through a fluid circulation system using a pump 20, and may cause continuous flows and circulations. Furthermore, after an embryo is grown up to a tadpole, the tadpole may be extracted out of a 3D chip reversely.
[0037] Hereinafter, a toxicity evaluation system 1 according to the inventive concept will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0038]
[0039] The toxicity evaluation system 1 according to the inventive concept may include the chip 10 including a passage 11, in which the sample may flow, and a plurality of recesses 12 provided on the passage 11, and by which objects included in the sample may be trapped. The toxicity evaluation system 1 according to the inventive concept may include the pump 20 that may inject the sample into the chip 10. Hereinafter, the chip 10 and the Xenopus laevis chip 10 may have the same meaning.
[0040] Referring to
[0041] The pump 20 according to the inventive concept may perform a control such that the sample flows in any one of a first direction or a second direction. The pump 20 may adjust a direction and a velocity of the flows of the sample. According to an example, the pump 20 is used to induce the flows of the solution 30, and according to an example, the pump 20 may be a peristaltic pump or a syringe pump. According to an embodiment, when the peristaltic pump 20 is used, a fluid may be made to circulate by causing sperms, therapeutic substances, or biomolecules to continuously flow at a constant velocity for several hours or several days.
[0042] According to an embodiment, the sample supplied to the chip 10 by using the pump 20 may be any one of the solution 30 containing spawns, the solution 30 containing sperms that may sterilize the spawns, or a pharmaceutical sample that may evaluate toxicity. According to an example, the sample may be a sample that is related to development of a Xenopus laevis frog.
[0043] According to an embodiment, the Xenopus laevis chip 10 included in the toxicity evaluation system 1 according to
[0044] According to the inventive concept, an effect and a toxicological operation of a material may be evaluated by trapping an egg at one trapping site, that is, in the recess 12, inducing egg fertilization by circulating sperms through a fluid circulating system, and circulating therapeutic substances or biomolecules. According to an example, operations, expressive types of toxics, and mechanism of various medicines, such as therapeutic substances or biomolecules, in particular, NSAIDs may be known. Furthermore, a direction of the flows of the fluid may be adjusted by using the pump 20. According to an example, when the sample flows in a forward direction, a single entity may be trapped, and when the sample flows in a reverse direction, the trapped entities may be extracted out of the 3D chip 10.
[0045]
[0046] Referring to
[0047] Referring to
[0048] According to an example, the second passage 11b may be omitted.
[0049] According to an example, the first width may have a size, by which the object included in the sample may flow, and the second width may have a size, by which the object included in the sample is prevented from flowing. The recess 12 may be provided in a direction that faces the outlet port 14 from the inlet port 13.
[0050] Referring to
[0051] According to an example, the Xenopus laevis chip 10 according to the inventive concept may have four functions. A single spawn may be trapped (single egg trapping), external fertilization (in vitro fertilization) may be possible, and development and escaping of a tadpole may be performed.
[0052] The drawing of the Xenopus laevis chip 10 disclosed in
[0053]
[0054] According to
[0055] Referring to
[0056]
[0057] According to an embodiment, when the solution 30 having eggs is injected in the forward direction, one egg may be trapped at a trapping site, that is, in the recess 12. When one trapping site, that is, the recess 12 is filled, the remaining entities may move to the next trapping site, that is, another recess 12 through a bypass, that is, the first passage 11a. Furthermore, when the fluid flows in the reverse direction, the entities trapped in the recesses 12 may be extracted out of the chip 10.
[0058] In more detail, the Xenopus laevis chip 10 may have the inlet port 13, through which the solution 30 may be injected, and the outlet port 14, through which the solution 30 may be extracted, and may include the plurality of recesses 12 that may be trapping sites, the first passage 11a, and the second passage 11b. When the Xenopus laevis spawns are collected in a pipette tip and are injected through the inlet port 13, the spawns move along the first passage 11a. When one spawn is trapped in the recess 12 while the sample containing the spawns flow along the first passage 11a, the remaining spawns return through the first passage 11a. By repeating the process, the spawns are trapped in the plurality of recesses 12 sequentially one by one, and after the spawns are trapped in all of the plurality of recesses 12, the remaining spawns are extracted toward the outlet port 14.
[0059]
[0060]
[0061] When movement of the tadpole that was in vitro fertilized in the Xenopus laevis chip 10 and was grown up is observed, it may be observed heat beats, tailing, and swimming.
[0062]
[0063] A structure of the Xenopus laevis chip 10 has an asymmetrical shape. The flows of the solution 30 may be adjusted to a forward or reverse direction through the peristaltic pump 20, and thus has different functions.
[0064] Referring to
[0065] That is, the tadpoles may be moved to desired recesses 12 by adjusting the flows of the solution in the forward direction and the reverse direction. In particular, the heads of the tadpoles are positioned toward the recesses 12 and the tails of the tadpoles are positioned toward the passage 11 by inducing the repeated forward and reverse flows, and thus the directions, in which the tadpoles are positioned, may be adjusted. Through this, a toxicity evaluation may be possible in the same condition.
[0066] According to
[0067] As in
[0068] The tadpoles may be located at desired trapping sites, that is, in the recesses 12 by carefully adjusting the flows of the solution 30 in the forward or reverse direction through the peristaltic pump 20 to control movements of the tadpoles.
[0069]
[0070] Referring to
[0071] Thereafter, an operation of injecting a sample for evaluating a toxicity of a living body, on which the in vitro fertilization has been completed, into the passage 11 may be included. According to an example, in addition to the toxicity evaluation of an organism, on which the in vitro fertilization has been completed, the toxicity evaluation may become possible by injecting the sample for the toxicity evaluation even in the development process.
[0072] Thereafter, when the growth of the tadpoles are finished, the entities may be extracted out of the 3D chip 10. Thereafter, embryogenesis may be studied through a molecular-biological analysis including an analysis of genes.
[0073] According to an example, by causing the solution to flow in a first direction by adjusting the pump 20, the organism, on which the in vitro fertilization has been completed, may be trapped in the recess 12. According to another example, by causing the solution to flow in a second direction by adjusting the pump 20, the organisms, on which the in vitro fertilization has been completed, may be caused to escape.
[0074] That is, according to the inventive concept, external fertilization may be observed, and may be utilized for pharmaceutical toxicology. Furthermore, side effects that may be caused as drugs are mixed with the solution 30 and are caused to flow in the external fertilization, development, and growth process in the chip 10.
[0075] Furthermore, the inventive concept may circulate the solution 30, in which the sperms are mixed for external fertilization, by using the pump 20. Alternatively, the solution for cultivating Xenopus laevis may be circulated, or drugs may be mixed therewith to be circulated. Furthermore, the chip 10 may be utilized for the study of embryogenesis.
[0076] According to the inventive concept, after external fertilization of embryos, a toxicity, by which therapeutic substances or biomolecules influence development of a vertebrate, may be evaluated.
[0077] The effects of the inventive concept are not limited to the above-mentioned effects, and the unmentioned effects can be clearly understood by those skilled in the art to which the inventive concept pertains from the specification and the accompanying drawings.
[0078] It is noted that the above embodiments are suggested for understanding of the inventive concept and do not limit the scope of the inventive concept, and various modifiable embodiments also fall within the scope of the inventive concept. It should be understood that the technical protection range of the inventive concept has to be determined by the technical spirit of the claims, and the technical protection range of the inventive concept is not limited to the lexical meaning of the claims but reaches even to the equivalent inventions.