Urinary Catheters with Improved Shape Recovery and Ease of Use
20230138293 · 2023-05-04
Inventors
- Brent H. Sellers (Libertyville, IL, US)
- Paul Healy (Claremorris, IE)
- William K. Arnold (Gurnee, IL, US)
- Horacio Montes de Oca Balderas (Ballina, IE)
Cpc classification
A61L2/087
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M25/0009
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61L29/06
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M25/002
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61L2202/24
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61L2400/16
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61L29/06
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61M27/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61L29/06
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
Catheters including thermoplastic polyurethane polymer tubing with improved shape recovery after storage in a substantially coiled configuration are provided.
Claims
1. A catheter product comprising: a package defining a cavity; a catheter including a thermoplastic polyurethane polymer tubing contained within the cavity of the package, wherein at least a portion of the polymer tubing is in a substantially arcuate configuration within the cavity, the portion of the polymer tubing being defined between a proximal location on the polymer tubing and a distal location on the polymer tubing; wherein a percent shape recovery of the portion of the polymer tubing after about 1 month at room temperature is at least 35%; wherein the percent shape recovery of the portion of the polymer tubing is calculated by the formula:
percent shape recovery=[1−(L0−L2)/(L0−L1)]×100 where L0=length of the portion of the polymer tubing as measured from the proximal location to the distal location when in a straight configuration; L1=the diameter of curvature of the portion of the polymer tubing when in the arcuate configuration within the cavity; and L2=the distance between the proximal location and distal location of the portion of the polymer tubing after removal from the arcuate configuration.
2. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the polymer tubing has a shore hardness of at least 80 A.
3. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the polymer tubing has a shore hardness of between 88 A and 91 A.
4. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the polymer tubing has been annealed for 2 hours at 100 C.
5. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the polymer tubing has been annealed for 24 hours at 100 C.
6. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the polymer tubing comprises polyether thermoplastic polyurethane.
7. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the polymer tubing comprises an aromatic thermoplastic polyurethane.
8. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the polymer tubing comprises a polyether aromatic thermoplastic polyurethane.
9. The catheter product of claim 1, further comprising a hydration medium within the cavity of the package.
10. The catheter product of claim 9, wherein the hydration medium comprises water.
11. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the catheter tubing has a hydrophilic coating.
12. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the catheter product has been sterilized with e-beam radiation.
13. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the package comprises a foil.
14. The catheter product of claim 1, further comprising a sleeve at least partially covering the polymer tubing.
15. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the catheter is a male urinary catheter.
16. The catheter product of claim 1, wherein the substantially arcuate configuration comprises a substantially coiled configuration.
17. A method for of making a urinary catheter product with improved shape recovery comprising: annealing a catheter including a thermoplastic polyurethane polymer tubing for at least 2 hours at 100 C; placing the catheter in an arcuate configuration within a cavity of a package; wherein at least a portion of the polymer tubing is in a substantially coiled configuration within the cavity, the portion of the polymer tubing being defined between a proximal location on the polymer tubing and a distal location on the polymer tubing; wherein a percent shape recovery of the portion of the polymer tubing after about 1 month at room temperature is at least 35%; wherein the percent shape recovery of the portion of the polymer tubing is calculated by the formula:
percent shape recovery=[1−(L0−L2)/(L0−L1)]×100 where L0=length of the portion of the polymer tubing as measured from the proximal location to the distal location when in a straight configuration; L1=the diameter of curvature of the portion of the polymer tubing when in the arcuate configuration within the cavity; and L2=the distance between the proximal location and distal location of the portion of the polymer tubing after removal from the arcuate configuration.
18. The method of claim 17, further comprising sterilizing using e-beam radiation.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein the polymer tubing has a shore hardness of at least 80 A, preferably of at least 88 A, or preferably of at least 90 A.
20. The method of claim 17, wherein the polymer tubing has a shore hardness of between 88 A and 91 A.
21.-51. (canceled)
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS
[0021] The embodiments disclosed herein are for the purpose of providing a description of the present subject matter, and it is understood that the subject matter may be embodied in various other forms and combinations not shown in detail. Therefore, specific embodiments and features disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting the subject matter as defined in the accompanying claims.
[0022] The present disclosure is directed to catheters that include tubing that may be inserted into and advanced within a lumen of a body, such as a urethra.
[0023] The catheters of the present disclosure include tubing that is made from a polymer material(s). The polymer material can be polyurethane, specifically a thermoplastic polyurethane. Thermoplastic polyurethanes can be polyester, polyether, or polycaprolactone based and can be aromatic or aliphatic. One or more of these thermoplastic polyurethanes may be utilized in the current embodiments. In an embodiment according to the current disclosure, the thermoplastic polyurethane is an aromatic polyether thermoplastic polyurethane. Blends of different thermoplastic polyurethanes or blends of different polymers, including polymers such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and thermoplastic elastomers (TPE) may also be used.
[0024] The shore hardness of the polymer tubing may be in the range of 80 A-95 A, preferably at least 80 A, or at least 88 A, or at least 90 A. In one embodiment, the shore hardness is in the range of 88 A-91 A. Hardness is calculated per the ASTM D2240 test method and tested with a durometer.
[0025]
[0026] The catheter 50 may be a hydrophilic catheter and catheter tubing 60 may include a hydrophilic coating. When the hydrophilic coating is wetted or hydrated with a hydration medium, such as water, it becomes lubricious which eases introduction of the device into the body and aids in reducing pain and discomfort associated with such introduction. The hydrophilic coating can be a single layer or multilayer hydrophilic coating. Multiple layered coating can include at least a base coat and top layer.
[0027] Catheter 50, optionally, also may include a thin flexible sleeve that covers at least a section of the outer surface of the catheter tube 60. The sleeve may be formed of any variety of thin flexible polymeric film materials, such as polyethylene, plasticized PVC, polypropylene, polyurethane or elastomeric hydrogels. When catheter tube 16 includes a hydrophilic coating thereon, the sleeve may be liquid and/or vapor permeable so as to allow liquid and/or vapor therethrough to hydrate the hydrophilic coating while catheter 50 is stored within package 80. Alternatively, the sleeve may include a hydration liquid or a foamed hydration liquid within the sleeve and in contact with the hydrophilic material.
[0028] The urinary catheter may be part of a catheter product that includes a package 70 as shown in
[0029] Package 80 is preferably liquid and gas impermeable and may be made from any suitable liquid and gas impermeable materials, such as foils, polymers or multilayer films or laminates containing layers of metallic and/or polymer materials. In one embodiment, the package is made from aluminum foil. In another embodiment, the package is made from a polymer film. In yet another embodiment the package is made from a multilayered film including a polymer overlaying a foil, such as polypropylene covered aluminum foil.
[0030] In the embodiment illustrated in
[0031] When catheter 50 is a hydrophilic catheter, package 80 may include one or more sources for hydrating the hydrophilic surface of the catheter while the catheter is stored within the package. An amount of hydration liquid, or wetting fluid, for contacting and hydrating the hydrophilic surface of the catheter 50 may be contained (or provided) within cavity 81 of package 80. In an alternative embodiment, an amount of vapor donating liquid that provides a hydration vapor for vapor hydrating the hydrophilic surface of the catheter 50 may be disposed within cavity of package 80. The hydration liquid, or wetting fluid, may include water and a number of additives. Additives can include stability compounds or antioxidants including, but not limited to, glycerol, topherols, and ascorbic acid.
[0032]
[0033] The catheters and/or catheter tubing of the current disclosure may be annealed to improve characteristics of the polymer tubing. Annealing is a heating process used to alter the characteristics of a compound. According to some embodiments of the current disclosure, the catheter and/or catheter tubing may be annealed for at least 2 hours at 100 C. In additional embodiments, the catheter and/or catheter tubing may be annealed for at least 20 hours at 100 C.
[0034] The catheters and catheter packages of the present disclosure may be sterilized prior to use. The catheter packages may be sterilized by applying a sufficient amount of radiation, such as gamma or E-Beam radiation. In one embodiment, the packages are electron beam sterilized at 10 MeV with a dose in the range of 25-65 kGy. The catheter packages can be sterilized with radiation while the hydrophilic coating is in contact with the wetting fluid.
[0035]
EXAMPLES
Example 1
[0036] Thermoplastic Urethane (TPU, Pellethane®), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), and Styrene-Ethylene-Butylene-Styrene/Polypropylene (SEBS/PP) Based Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) CH14 catheter tubing materials of different shore hardness (A) were packed in coiled configurations with three different lengths of the portion of the polymer tubing as measured from the proximal location to the distal location when in a straight configuration (L0=78.5, 122, and 166.5). The tubing material was fastened in the coiled configuration. Prior to packing, some samples were annealed (indicated by ann). Annealing was carried out at 100° C. for 20 hours in a vertical position with a metal rod inside the lumen of the tube, the rod had a diameter smaller than the inner diameter of the tubing. Approximately 4 mL of water was added to each pack. Each pack was sealed and electron beam sterilized at 10 MeV with a dose in the range of 25-65 kGy. The packs were stored for 1 month at room temperature. After 1 month, the samples were freely hung for 2 minutes and then the length of the partially curved catheter portion (L2) measurement was taken.
[0037] Percent recovery was calculated using the formula: percent recovery=[1−(L0−L2)/(L0−L1)]×100. Where L0 is the length of the portion of the polymer tubing as measured from the proximal location to the distal location when in a straight configuration, L1 is the diameter of curvature of the portion of the tubing when in the coiled configuration within the cavity, and L2 is the distance between the proximal location and distal location of the portion of the tubing after removal from the coiled configuration.
[0038] Table 1 shows the % recovery for L0=78.5 mm.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 % Material L1 L2 recovery Pellethane 2363-90AE 52.0 64.3 46 Pellethane 2363-90AE ann. 51.0 70.1 69 Pellethane 2363-80AE 51.0 68.5 64 Pellethane 2363-80AE ann. 52.0 70.5 70 PVC 82A 51.0 60.0 33 TPE 83A 49.0 65.5 56
[0039] Table 2 shows the % recovery for L0=122 mm.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Material L1 L2 % recovery Pellethane 2363-90AE 78 96 41 Pellethane 2363-90AE ann 77 110 73 Pellethane 2363-80AE 78 104 59 Pellethane 2363-80AE ann 79 112 77 PVC 82A 77 91 31 TPE 83A 77 101 53
[0040] Table 3 shows the % recovery for L0=166.5 mm.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Material L1 L2 % recovery Pellethane 2363-90AE 107 137 50 Pellethane 2363-90AE ann 106 150 73 Pellethane 2363-80AE 112 147 64 Pellethane 2363-80AE ann 106 157 85 PVC 82A 112 135 42 TPE 83A 103 134 49
Example 2
[0041] Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE), and polyolefin based elastomers (TPO) CH14 tubing materials of different shore hardness (A) were packed in coiled configurations in a medium package (L1=122). The tubing material was coiled in the package. Approximately 4 mL of water was added to each pack. Each pack was sealed and electron beam sterilized at 10 MeV with a dose in the range of 25-65 kGy. The packs were stored for 4 months at room temperature. L2 was measured after removal from the coiled configuration. Table 4 shows the percent recovery for each catheter tube.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Recovery Material [%] PVC 82A 26 PVC 91A 14 TPO 80A 10 TPO 90A 10 TPE 83A 26 TPE 90A 14
Example 3
[0042] Different TPU (including commercially available Texin® and Pellethane®), PVC, and TPE CH14 tubing materials of varying shore hardness (A) were packed in coiled configurations with L0=141 mm. The tubing material was placed in a coiled metal jig that had a circular channel. The tubing material was placed in the channel of the jig, such that the channel held the tubing in the circular configuration. TPU samples were annealed. Annealing was carried out at 100° C. for 2 hours or 20 hours in a vertical position with a metal rod inside the lumen of the tube, the rod had a diameter smaller than the inner diameter of the tubing.
[0043] The tensile storage modulus (E′) and loss modulus (E″) was measured in the temperature range −60° C. to 70° C. at 1 Hz approximately 7 days after annealing. For viscoelastic materials, the storage modulus is proportional to the stored energy for the elastic portion of the material, and the loss modulus is proportional to the energy dissipated as heat for the viscous portion of the material. A Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer TA Instruments DMA Q800, available from TA Instruments, Inc., of New Castle, Del.; equipped with a film clamp and Thermal Advantage DMA Q800 V7.5 Build 127 software for data acquisition was used for measuring the storage modulus (E′) and loss modulus (E″). The test parameters that were used include: frequency of 1 Hz, oscillation amplitude of 25.0, static force of 0.0100 N, force track at 125.0% and minimum oscillation force at 0.02000 N. The catheter tubing was cut into a 33 mm long section. That section was bisected along its axis. One half of the bisected tubing, having a length of 33 mm and a width of 6.5 mm, was used as the sample for the testing. The mechanical properties were then analysed using the instruments described above with the multi-frequency strain experimental program method. The experimental method steps include: turning data storage off, equilibrating at −65° C., maintaining isothermal state for 5 minutes, turning data storage on, and ramping temperature 2° C./min to a temperature of 70° C. The program halts and saves the collected data once the temperature of 70° C. has been reached during the temperature ramp step.
[0044] Tube samples were stored in the coiled shape for 6 weeks at 40° C. Samples were removed from the oven and equilibrated at room temperature for a minimum of 1 hour prior to uncoiling and taking the L2 measurement. Table 5 shows the percent recovery and storage modulus.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 % E′ E″ Material L0 L1 L2 recovery [MPa] [MPa] Pellethane 2363- 141 90 109 37 26 5.1 90AE not ann Pellethane 2363- 141 90 115 49 19 2.8 90AE ann 2 h Pellethane 2363- 141 90 116 51 19 2.8 90AE ann 20 h Texin 50D not ann 141 90 100 19 75 19.8 Texin 50D ann 2 h 141 90 109 37 60 12.1 Texin 50D ann 20 h 141 90 110 39 50 8.9 PVC91A 141 90 95 10 41 17.5 TPE 88A 141 90 106 31 44 9.7
Example 4
[0045] PVC with shore hardness 91 A, TPE with shore hardness 88 A, and TPU with shore hardness 90 A Ch 14 catheter tubing was packed in three different pack sizes to compare the shape recovery between materials and pack designs. The tubing material was coiled in the pack. The packs were stored for a month at room temperature. Table 6 shows the pack dimensions with different length to width ratios. For this example, L0 was 40 cm and L1 corresponds to the width of the pack.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Width Length Length/width [mm] [mm] [%] Pack A 105 140 75 Pack B 100 150 66 Pack C 70 160 44
[0046]
[0047] It will be understood that the embodiments described above are illustrative of some of the applications of the principles of the present subject matter. Numerous modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter, including those combinations of features that are individually disclosed or claimed herein. For these reasons, the scope hereof is not limited to the above description but is as set forth in the following claims, and it is understood that claims may be directed to the features hereof, including as combinations of features that are individually disclosed or claimed herein.