HETEROCLITIC CANCER VACCINES
20230139506 · 2023-05-04
Inventors
- Mathieu André-Jérôme Gigoux (New York, NY, US)
- Jedd D. Wolchok (New York, NY)
- Taha Merghoub (Jersey City, NJ)
Cpc classification
A61K9/1273
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/0019
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/0053
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K45/06
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/127
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C12N15/86
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A61P35/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A61K39/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61K9/127
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61P35/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
In some aspects, the present invention provides heteroclitic CALRMUT peptides designed and selected to elicit an immune response to CALRMUT in subjects with JAK2 mutant-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, nucleic acid molecules encoding such peptides, compositions comprising such peptides or nucleic acid molecules, and various associated compositions and methods.
Claims
1. An isolated heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide comprising the amino acid sequence of any one of SEQ ID Nos 1-262.
2. A composition comprising a peptide according to claim 1.
3. A composition comprising a peptide according to claim 1 and a delivery vehicle.
4. The composition according to claim 3, wherein the delivery vehicle is selected from the group consisting of a nanoparticle, a lipid nanoparticle, a liposome, a lipid, a lipid encapsulation system, a polymer and a polymersome.
5. A composition comprising a peptide according to any of claims 2-4, further comprising an adjuvant.
6. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a peptide according to claim 1.
7. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising: (a) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a peptide according to claim 1, and (b) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a signal peptide, wherein the nucleic acid sequence encoding the peptide according to claim 1 is downstream of the nucleic acid sequence encoding the signal peptide.
8. The nucleic acid molecule according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the nucleic acid molecule is a DNA molecule.
9. The nucleic acid molecule according to claim 8, wherein the nucleic acid molecule comprises a promoter that is operably linked to the nucleic acid sequence encoding the peptide.
10. The nucleic acid molecule according to claim 6 or claim 7, wherein the nucleic acid molecule is an RNA molecule.
11. The nucleic acid molecule according to claim 10, wherein the nucleic acid molecule is an mRNA molecule.
12. A vector comprising a nucleic acid molecule according to any one of claims 6-11.
13. The vector according to claim 12, wherein the vector is a viral vector.
14. The viral vector according to claim 13, selected from the group consisting of an adenovirus, an adeno-associated virus, a retrovirus, a lentivirus, an alphavirus, and a vaccinia virus.
15. A cell comprising a nucleic acid molecule according to any of claims 6-11.
16. A composition comprising a nucleic acid molecule according to any of claims 6-11.
17. A composition comprising a nucleic acid molecule according to any of claims 6-11 and a delivery vehicle.
18. The composition according to claim 17, wherein the delivery vehicle is selected from the group consisting of a nanoparticle, a lipid nanoparticle, a liposome, a lipid, a lipid encapsulation system, a polymer and a polymersome.
19. The composition according to any of claims 16-18, further comprising an adjuvant.
20. An isolated heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide comprising the amino acid sequence: TABLE-US-00017 (SEQ ID NO. 275) X1X2M3X4X5X6X7X8X9 wherein, independently of each other, X1 is selected from: R, Y, F, M, and W, X2 is selected from: M, Y, P, S, T, A, E, R, Q, F, and W, X4 is selected from: R, D, and E, X5 is selected from: T, W, Y, H, K, R, and F, X6 is selected from: K, F, I, L, V, M, W, Y, T, C, N, and S, X7 is selected from: M, and W, X8 is selected from: R, A, P, S, Y, and F, and X9 is selected from: M, K, V, F, R, Y, W, and H, and wherein, the amino acid sequence comprises at least one point mutation as compared to CALR9p2 (SEQ ID NO. 263).
21. The peptide according to claim 20, wherein the amino acid sequence is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos 1-46.
22. The peptide according to claim 20, wherein the amino acid sequence is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID Nos 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 40.
23. A composition comprising a peptide according to any of claims 20-22.
24. A composition comprising a peptide according to any of claims 20-22 and a delivery vehicle.
25. The composition according to claim 24, wherein the delivery vehicle is selected from the group consisting of a nanoparticle, a lipid nanoparticle, a liposome, a lipid, a lipid encapsulation system, a polymer and a polymersome.
26. A composition according to any of claims 23-25, further comprising an adjuvant.
27. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleic acid sequence encoding a peptide according to any of claims 20-22.
28. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising: (a) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a peptide according to any of claims 20-22, and (b) a nucleic acid sequence encoding a signal peptide, wherein the nucleic acid sequence encoding the peptide according to any of claims 20-22 is downstream of the nucleic acid sequence encoding the signal peptide.
29. The nucleic acid molecule according to claim 27 or 28, wherein the nucleic acid molecule is a DNA molecule.
30. The nucleic acid molecule according to claim 29, wherein the nucleic acid molecule comprises a promoter that is operably linked to the nucleic acid sequence encoding the peptide.
31. The nucleic acid molecule according to claim 27 or claim 28, wherein the nucleic acid molecule is an RNA molecule.
32. The nucleic acid molecule according to claim 31, wherein the nucleic acid molecule is an mRNA molecule.
33. A vector comprising a nucleic acid molecule according to any one of claims 27-32.
34. The vector according to claim 33, wherein the vector is a viral vector.
35. The viral vector according to claim 34, selected from the group consisting of an adenovirus, an adeno-associated virus, a retrovirus, a lentivirus, an alphavirus, and a vaccinia virus.
36. A cell comprising a nucleic acid molecule according to any of claims 27-32.
37. A composition comprising a nucleic acid molecule according to any of claims 27-32.
38. A composition comprising a nucleic acid molecule according to any of claims 27-32 and a delivery vehicle.
39. The composition according to claim 38, wherein the delivery vehicle is selected from the group consisting of a nanoparticle, a lipid nanoparticle, a liposome, a lipid, a lipid encapsulation system, a polymer and a polymersome.
40. The composition according to any of claims 37-39, further comprising an adjuvant.
41. A method of treating a JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of: (a) a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to claim 1, or (b) a nucleic acid molecule encoding a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to claim 1.
42. A method of treating a JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of: (a) a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to claim 20, or (b) a nucleic acid molecule encoding a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to claim 20.
43. A method of treating a JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of: (a) a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to claim 21, or (b) a nucleic acid molecule encoding a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to claim 21.
44. A method of treating a JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of: (a) a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to claim 22, or (b) a nucleic acid molecule encoding a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to claim 22.
45. A method of treating a JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of: a. a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide according to any of claim 1, 20, 21 or 22, b. a nucleic acid molecule according to any of claim 6-11 or 27-32, c. a composition according to any of claim 2-5, 16-19, 23-26, or 37-40, or d. a vector according to any of claim 12-14 or 33-35.
46. The method of any of claims 40-45, further comprising performing a diagnostic test to determine if the subject has a JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN.
47. The method of any of claims 40-46, further comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of an immune checkpoint inhibitor.
48. The method of claim 47, wherein the immune checkpoint inhibitor is a PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 or CTLA-4 inhibitor.
49. The method of claim 47, wherein the immune checkpoint inhibitor is anti-PD1 antibody.
50. The method of any of claims 40-49, wherein the treatment results in one or more of: a. an immune response to the JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN, b. A CD8+ T cell response to the JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN, c. an anti-CALR.sup.MUT immune response, d. an anti-CALR.sup.MUT T cell response, e. enhanced sensitivity of the to the JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN to immune checkpoint blockade.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0140]
[0141]
[0142]
[0143]
[0144]
[0145]
[0146]
[0147]
[0148]
[0149]
[0150]
[0151]
[0152]
[0153]
[0154]
[0155]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0156] The sub-headings provided below, and throughout this patent disclosure, are not intended to denote limitations of the various aspects or embodiments of the invention, which are to be understood by reference to the specification as a whole. For example, this Detailed Description is intended to read in conjunction with, and to expand upon, the description provided in the Summary of the Invention section of this application.
Definitions & Abbreviations
[0157] As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The terms “a” (or “an”) as well as the terms “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably.
[0158] Furthermore, “and/or” is to be taken as specific disclosure of each of the two specified features or components with or without the other. Thus, the term “and/or” as used in a phrase such as “A and/or B” is intended to include A and B, A or B, A (alone), and B (alone). Likewise, the term “and/or” as used in a phrase such as “A, B, and/or C” is intended to include A, B, and C; A, B, or C; A or B; A or C; B or C; A and B; A and C; B and C; A (alone); B (alone); and C (alone).
[0159] Units, prefixes, and symbols are denoted in their Systéme International de Unites (SI) accepted form.
[0160] Numeric ranges provided herein are inclusive of the numbers defining the range. Where a numeric term is preceded by “about,” the term includes the stated number and values ±10% of the stated number.
[0161] Numbers in parentheses or superscript following text in this patent disclosure refer to the numbered references provided in the “Reference List” section at the end of this patent disclosure.
[0162] Wherever embodiments are described with the language “comprising,” otherwise analogous embodiments described in terms of “consisting of” and/or “consisting essentially of” are included.
[0163] As used herein the abbreviation CALR refers to calreticulin.
[0164] As used herein the term CALR.sup.MUT refers to the 44-amino acid C-terminal fragment of CALR having the amino acid sequence:
TABLE-US-00013 (SEQ ID NO. 288) RRMMRTKMRMRRMRRTRRKMRRKMSPA RPRTSCREACLQGWTEA
[0165] that is generated in response to various mutations (including several known, specific frameshift mutations) in calreticulin, and also refers to any calreticulin mutation (including frameshift mutation) that results in the generation of this 44-amino acid C-terminal fragment.
[0166] As used herein the terms “CALR′ peptide” and “native CALR.sup.MUT peptide” and “parental CALR.sup.MUT peptide” refer a peptide comprising some portion of the 44-amino acid C-terminal mutant fragment of CALR (CALR.sup.MUT), i.e., SEQ ID NO. 288. The CALR.sup.MUT peptides described herein are typically about 8-13, e.g., 9-12 amino acids long, but can be longer or shorter.
[0167] As used herein the abbreviation CTLA-4 refers to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein
[0168] The terms “heteroclitic,” “heteroclitic peptide” and “heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide” are used herein consistent with the normal meaning of the term “heteroclitic” in the field of the invention, and, as used herein, refer to a mutated version of a peptide that has superior properties as compared to its non-mutant counterpart. The non-mutant counterparts of the hetereoclitic peptides described herein are sometimes referred to herein as “native” peptides or “parental” peptides or “non-heteroclitic peptides” or “CALR.sup.MUT peptides” or “native CALR.sup.MUT peptides” or “parental CALR.sup.MUT peptides.” The heteroclitic peptides provided herein have at least one amino acid point mutation as compared to the native peptides from which they are derived, and were designed and/or selected to have one or more of the following superior properties: (a) superior immunogenicity as compared to their native counterparts, (b) superior HLA binding (e.g. affinity) as compared to their native counterparts, (c) an HLA-I binding affinity of <500 nm, (d) an HLA-I binding affinity of <100 nm, (d) being a superior T cell receptor (TCR) epitope as compared to their native counterparts, (e) superior (e.g., increased) TCR agonist activity as compared to their native counterparts, (f) superior induction of T cell responses as compared to their native counterparts, and (g) induction of superior (e.g. increased) antigen-specific (i.e. CALRMUT-specific) antitumor immunity as compared to their native counterparts. The term “heteroclitic” may also be further understood with reference to: Gold et al., (2003) “A Single Heteroclitic Epitope Determines Cancer Immunity After Xenogeneic DNA Immunization Against a Tumor Differentiation Antigen,” J. Immunol May 15, 2003, 170 (10) 5188-5194; 13. Solinger et al. (1979), “Lymphocyte response to cytochrome c.; Demonstration of a T-cell heteroclitic proliferative response and identification of a topographic antigenic determinant on pigeon cytochrome c whose immune recognition requires two complementing major histocompatibility complex-linked immune response genes,” J. Exp. Med. 150:830; Wang et al. (1999), “The stimulation of low-affinity, nontolerized clones by heteroclitic antigen analogues causes the breaking of tolerance established to an immunodominant T cell epitope.” J. Exp. Med. 190:983; Dyall et al., (1998). “Heteroclitic immunization induces tumor immunity,” J. Exp. Med. 188:1553; Slansky et al., (2000). “Enhanced antigen-specific antitumor immunity with altered peptide ligands that stabilize the MHC-peptide-TCR complex. Immunity,” 13:529; Bakker et al., (1997), “Analogues of CTL epitopes with improved MHC class-I binding capacity elicit anti-melanoma CTL recognizing the wildtype epitope.” Int. J. Cancer 70.:302; Parkhurst et al., (1996), “Improved induction of melanoma-reactive CTL with peptides from the melanoma antigen gp100 modified at HLA-A*0201-binding residues.” J. Immunol. 157:2539; and Valmori et al., (1998), “Enhanced generation of specific tumor-reactive CTL in vitro by selected Melan-A/MART-1 immunodominant peptide analogues,” J. Immunol. 160:1750.
[0169] The abbreviation “HLA” refers to human leukocyte antigen.
[0170] In each of the embodiments that involve peptides and/or nucleic acid molecules, the peptides and/or nucleic acid molecules can optionally be in “isolated” form. An “isolated” peptide or nucleic acid molecule is not within a living subject or cell and is typically in a form not found in nature. In some embodiments an isolated peptide or nucleic acid molecule may have been purified to a degree that it is not in a form in which it is found in nature. In some embodiments, a peptide or nucleic acid molecule that is isolated is substantially pure. In some embodiments, a protein or nucleic acid molecule that is isolated has a purity of greater than 75%, or greater than 80%, or greater than 90%, or greater than 95%.
[0171] The terms “identical” or “percent identity” in the context of a comparison between two peptides refer to amino acid sequences that are the same (identical) or have a specified percentage of amino acid residues that are the same (percent identity), when compared and aligned (introducing gaps, if necessary) for maximum correspondence, not considering any conservative amino acid substitutions as part of the sequence identity. The percent identity of two peptides can be determined using sequence comparison software or algorithms or by visual inspection. Various algorithms and software are known in the art that can be used to obtain alignments of amino acid sequences and determine identity and/or percentage identity.
[0172] As used herein the abbreviation “MPN” refers to myeloproliferative neoplasms.
[0173] As used herein the abbreviation “PD-1” refers to Programmed Death 1, which is also known as Programmed Death Protein 1 or Programmed Cell Death Protein 1.
[0174] As used herein the abbreviation PD-L1 refers to Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1—which is a ligand for PD-1.
[0175] As used herein the abbreviation PD-L2 refers to Programmed Cell Death Ligand 2.
[0176] Various other terms are defined elsewhere in this patent disclosure, where used. Furthermore, terms that are not specifically defined herein may be more fully understood in the context in which the terms are used and/or by reference to the specification in its entirety. Where no explicit definition is provided all technical and scientific terms used herein have the meanings commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains.
Heteroclitic CALR.SUP.MUT .Peptides
[0177] In certain embodiments the present invention provides heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides, including those for which amino acid sequences are provided in the below Tables A and B.
[0178] Tables A and B also provide the amino acid sequences of the parental CALR.sup.MUT peptides from which the various heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides were derived.
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE A Peptide Sequences Hetero- clitic Hetero- Parental Parental peptide clitic peptide peptide Parental aa peptide aa SEQ ID peptide sequence SEQ ID NO. sequence NO. Name RMMRTFMRM 1 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 YMMRTKMRM 2 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 FMMRTKMRM 3 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTIMRM 4 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTLMRM 5 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTVMRM 6 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRWKMRM 7 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTMMRM 8 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMRK 9 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMDTKMRM 10 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMETKMRM 11 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMRV 12 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMRF 13 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RYMRTKMRM 14 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTWMRM 15 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMRR 16 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMRY 17 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMAM 18 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RPMRTKMRM 19 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMRW 20 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMPM 21 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMSM 22 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMRH 23 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RSMRTKMRM 24 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RTMRTKMRM 25 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 MMMRTKMRM 26 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRYKMRM 27 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 WMMRTKMRM 28 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRHKMRM 29 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRKKMRM 30 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRRKMRM 31 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RAMRTKMRM 32 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTYMRM 33 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMYM 34 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 REMRTKMRM 35 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RRMRTKMRM 36 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RQMRTKMRM 37 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RFMRTKMRM 38 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RWMRTKMRM 39 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRFKMRM 40 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTTMRM 41 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTCMRM 42 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTNMRM 43 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTSMRM 44 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKWRM 45 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 RMMRTKMFM 46 RMMRTKMRM 263 CALR9p2 MRMRRMRRL 47 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MRMRRMRRM 48 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MRMRRMRRI 49 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MRMRRMRRV 50 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MRMRRMRRF 51 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MRMRRMRRY 52 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MPMRRMRRT 53 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MLMRRMRRT 54 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MMMRRMRRT 55 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MRMRRMRAT 56 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MRMRRMRPT 57 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 MRMRRMRST 58 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 RRMRRMRRT 59 MRMRRMRRT 264 CALR9p8 KMRRKMWPA 60 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMFRKMSPA 61 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMMRKMSPA 62 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMIRKMSPA 63 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMWRKMSPA 64 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMYRKMSPA 65 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMLRKMSPA 66 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRKMSPY 67 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRKMSPK 68 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KPRRKMSPA 69 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRKMSPL 70 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRKMSPF 71 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRKMSPM 72 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 FMRRKMSPA 73 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMARKMSPA 74 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMVRKMSPA 75 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRKMSPR 76 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRKMSPW 77 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 YMRRKMSPA 78 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMREKMSPA 79 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRDKMSPA 80 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 MMRRKMSPA 81 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMNRKMSPA 82 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMSRKMSPA 83 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRFMSPA 84 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 KMRRKMSPV 85 KMRRKMSPA 265 CALR9p19 RPSCREACL 86 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCREACK 87 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCREACW 88 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RESCREACL 89 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTKCREACL 90 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTRCREACL 91 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCRFACL 92 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCRHACL 93 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCRRACL 94 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCRWACL 95 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCRYACL 96 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCREACR 97 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RQSCREACL 98 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RLSCREACL 99 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RMSCREACL 100 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RTSCREACY 101 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RYSCREACL 102 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RRSCREACL 103 RTSCREACL 266 CALR9p30 RPKMRMRRM 104 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTKMRMRAM 105 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTKMRMRPM 106 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTMMRMRRM 107 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTFMRMRRM 108 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTYMRMRRM 109 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTKMRMRRR 110 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTKMRMRRK 111 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTKMRMRRW 112 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTWMRMRRM 113 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTKMRMRRY 114 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RQKMRMRRM 115 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RRKMRMRRM 116 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTAMRMRRM 117 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTIMRMRRM 118 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTLMRMRRM 119 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 RTVMRMRRM 120 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 DTKMRMRRM 121 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 ETKMRMRRM 122 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 FTKMRMRRM 123 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 HTKMRMRRM 124 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 YTKMRMRRM 125 RTKMRMRRM 267 CALR9p5 FRMRRTRRKM 126 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 YRMRRTRRKM 127 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RPMRRTRRKM 128 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RRPRRTRRKM 129 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 MRMRRTRRKM 130 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 WRMRRTRRKM 131 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RLMRRTRRKM 132 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RMMRRTRRKM 133 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RRMRRTRRKR 134 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RQMRRTRRKM 135 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RSMRRTRRKM 136 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RTMRRTRRKM 137 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RYMRRTRRKM 138 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 REMRRTRRKM 139 RRMRRTRRKM 268 CALR10p11 RKMRRKMSPK 140 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RPMRRKMSPA 141 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKPRRKMSPA 142 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMRRKMSPY 143 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMRRKMSPF 144 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMRRKMSPR 145 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMRRKMSPM 146 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RRMRRKMSPA 147 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RLMRRKMSPA 148 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RMMRRKMSPA 149 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMFRKMSPA 150 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMIRKMSPA 151 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMMRKMSPA 152 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMWRKMSPA 153 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMYRKMSPA 154 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMRRKMWPA 155 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 REMRRKMSPA 156 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 RKMRRKMSPL 157 RKMRRKMSPA 269 CALR10p18 TKMRMRRMRK 158 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TKMYMRRMRR 159 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TTMRMRRMRR 160 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TVMRMRRMRR 161 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TIMRMRRMRR 162 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TKMRMRRMRL 163 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TKMRMRRMRF 164 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TKMRMRRMRI 165 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TKMRMRRMRM 166 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TKMRMRRMRV 167 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TAMRMRRMRR 168 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TSMRMRRMRR 169 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 RKMRMRRMRR 170 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TRMRMRRMRR 171 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 TMMRMRRMRR 172 TKMRMRRMRR 270 CALR10p6 RPRRMRRTRRKM 173 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMRRMRRTIRKM 174 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMRRMRRTLRKM 175 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMRRMRRTMRKM 176 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMRRPRRTRRKM 177 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMMRMRRTRRKM 178 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMRRMRWTRRKM 179 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMRRMRRWRRKM 180 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMRRMRRTYRKM 181 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMPRMRRTRRKM 182 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 RMRPMRRTRRKM 183 RMRRMRRTRRKM 271 CALR12p9 SPARPRTSCL 184 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSCF 185 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSCI 186 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSCM 187 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSCV 188 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSCA 189 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSIR 190 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSLR 191 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSMR 192 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSVR 193 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SFARPRTSCR 194 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 STARPRTSCR 195 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SVARPRTSCR 196 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SYARPRTSCR 197 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSYR 198 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTWCR 199 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSFR 200 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SIARPRTSCR 201 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SSARPRTSCR 202 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPAFPRTSCR 203 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SAARPRTSCR 204 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPAYPRTSCR 205 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSCK 206 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SMARPRTSCR 207 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPFRPRTSCR 208 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPMRPRTSCR 209 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SLARPRTSCR 210 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SQARPRTSCR 211 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SWARPRTSCR 212 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPAWPRTSCR 213 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTFCR 214 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 SPARPRTSCY 215 SPARPRTSCR 272 CALR10p25 RTKMRMRMMR 216 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRRMK 217 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRFMR 218 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRLMR 219 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRWMR 220 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRYMR 221 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRIMR 222 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRVMR 223 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 MTKMRMRRMR 224 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 ETKMRMRRMR 225 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 FTKMRMRRMR 226 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 HTKMRMRRMR 227 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 NTKMRMRRMR 228 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 YTKMRMRRMR 229 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRRMW 230 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRRMY 231 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRRMF 232 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRRMM 233 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRRM1 234 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRRML 235 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RTKMRMRRMV 236 RTKMRMRRMR 273 CALR10p5 RRMRRTRRL 237 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRM 238 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRF 239 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RIMRRTRRK 240 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RMMRRTRRK 241 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RTMRRTRRK 242 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RVMRRTRRK 243 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RSMRRTRRK 244 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RLMRRTRRK 245 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RAMRRTRRK 246 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RQMRRTRRK 247 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RFMRRTRRK 248 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RWMRRTRRK 249 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RYMRRTRRK 250 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RCMRRTRRK 251 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RGMRRTRRK 252 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RNMRRTRRK 253 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRFK 254 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRYK 255 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRI 256 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRV 257 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRY 258 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRW 259 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRA 260 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRC 261 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11 RRMRRTRRT 262 RRMRRTRRK 274 CALR9p11
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE B Consensus Sequences Heteroclitic Parental Parental Heteroclitic peptide peptide Parental peptide peptide peptide consensus aa sequence SEQ ID NO. aa sequence name SEQ ID NO. X1X2M3X4X5X6X7X8X9 (SEQ ID NO. 275) 275 RMMRTKMRM CALR9p2 263 wherein: X1 is: R, Y, F, M, or W X2 is: M, Y, P, S, T, A, E, R, Q, F, or W X4 is: R, D, or E X5 is: T, W, Y, H, K, R, or F X6 is: K, F, I, L, V, M, W, Y, T, C, N, or S X7 is: M, or W X8 is: R, A, P, S, Y, or F X9 is: M, K, V, F, R, Y, W, or H X1X2M3R4R5M6R7X8X9 (SEQ ID NO. 276) 276 MRMRRMRRT CALR9p8 264 Wherein: X1 is: M, or R X2 is: R, P, L, or M X8 is: R, A, P, or S X9 is: T, L, M, I, V, F, or Y X1X2X3X4X5M6X7P8X9 (SEQ ID NO. 277) 277 KMRRKMSPA CALR9p19 265 Wherein: X1 is: K, F, Y, or M X2 is: M, or P X3 is: R, F, M, I, W, Y, L, A, V, N, or S X4 is: R, E, or D X5 is: K, or F X7 is: S, or W X9 is: A, Y, K, L, F, M, R, W, or V R1X2X3C4R5X6A7C8X9 (SEQ ID NO. 278) 278 RTSCREACL CALR9p30 266 Wherein: X2 is: T, P, E, Q, L, M, Y, or R X3 is: S, K, or R X6 is: E, F, H, R, W, or Y X9 is: L, K, W, R, or Y X1X2X3M4R5M6R7X8X9 (SEQ ID NO. 279) 279 RTKMRMRRM CALR9p5 267 Wherein: X1 is: R, D, E, F, H, or Y X2 is: T, P, Q, or R X3 is: K, M, F, Y, W, A, I, L, or V X8 is: R, A, or P X9 is: M, R, K, W, or Y X1X2X3R4R5T6R7R8K9X10(SEQ ID NO. 280) 280 RRMRRTRRKM CALR10p11 268 Wherein: X1 is: R, F, Y, M, or W X2 is: R, P, L, M, Q, S, T, Y, or E X3 is: M, or P X10 is: M, or R R1X2X3X4R5K6M7X8P9X10 (SEQ ID NO. 281) 281 RKMRRKMSPA CALR10p18 269 Wherein: X2 is: K, P, R, L, M, or E X3 is: M, or P X4 is: R, F, I, M, W, or Y X8 is: S, or W X10 is: A, K, Y, F, R, M, or L X1X2M3X4M5R6R7M8R9X10 (SEQ ID NO. 282) 282 TKMRMRRMRR CALR10p6 270 Wherein: X1 is: T, or R X2 is: K, T, V, I, A, S, R, or M X4 is: R, or Y X10 is: R, K, L, F, I, M, or V R1X2X3X4X5R6X7X8X9R10K11M12 (SEQ ID NO. 283 RMRRMRRTRRKM CALR12p9 271 283) Wherein: X2 is: M, or P X3 is: R, M, or P X4 is: R, or P X5 is: M, or P X7 is: R, or W X8 is: T, or W X9 is: R, I, L, M, or Y S1X2X3X4P5R6T7X8X9X10 (SEQ ID NO. 284) 284 SPARPRTSCR CALR10p25 272 Wherein: X2 is: P, F, T, V, Y, I, S, A, M, L, Q, or W X3 is: A, F, or M X4 is: R, F, Y, or W X8 is: S, W, or F X9 is: C, I, L, M, V, Y, or F X10 is: R, L, F, I, M, V, A, K, or Y X1T2K3M4R5M6R7X8M9X10 (SEQ ID NO. 285) 285 RTKMRMRRMR CALR10p5 273 Wherein: X1 is: R, M, E, F, H, N, or Y X8 is: R, M, F, L, W, Y, I, or V X10 is: R, K, W, Y, F, M, I, L, or V R1X2M3R4R5T6R7X8X9 (SEQ ID NO. 286) 286 RRMRRTRRK CALR9p11 274 Wherein: X2 is: R, I, M, T, V, S, L, A, Q, F, W, Y, C, G, or N X8 is: R, F, or Y X9 is: K, L, M, F, I, V, Y, W, A, C, or T
[0179] In some embodiments, the heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides described herein have one or more the following superior properties: (a) superior immunogenicity as compared to their native counterparts, (b) superior HLA binding (e.g. affinity) as compared to their native counterparts, (c) an HLA-I binding affinity of <500 nm, (d) an HLA-I binding affinity of <100 nm, (d) being a superior T cell receptor (TCR) epitope as compared to their native counterparts, (e) superior (e.g., increased) TCR agonist activity as compared to their native counterparts, (f) superior induction of CD8+ T cell responses as compared to their native counterparts, (g) induction of superior (e.g. increased) antigen-specific (i.e. CALRMUT-specific) antitumor immunity as compared to their native counterparts.
[0180] In certain embodiments the present invention also provides variants of the heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides described herein. In some embodiments such variants comprise 1 or 2 or 3 or more amino acid point mutations as compared to any of SEQ ID Nos 1-262, or have an amino acid sequence that is at least 90%, or at least 95%, or at least 96%, or at least 97%, or at least 98%, or at least 99% identical to any of SEQ ID Nos 1-262, provided that such variants are heteroclitic, and/or exhibit one or more the superior properties described above.
[0181] In some embodiments a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide as described herein is 8, or 9, or 10, or 11, or 12, or 13 amino acids in length. In some embodiments a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide as described herein is 8-13 amino acids in length. In some embodiments a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide as described herein is 9-12 amino acids in length.
[0182] In some embodiments a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide as described herein comprises one amino acid point mutation as compared to the parental peptide from which it is derived. In some embodiments a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide as described herein comprises two amino acid point mutations as compared to the parental peptide from which it is derived. In some embodiments, where the heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides comprise two amino acid point mutations, those mutations can be a combination of any two of the single amino acid point mutations described herein (e.g. the single point mutations present in SEQ ID Nos. 1-262).
Nucleic Acid Molecules
[0183] In some embodiments the present invention provides nucleic acid molecules that encode the heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides described herein. In some embodiments the nucleic acid molecules are DNA. In some embodiments the nucleic acid molecules are RNA. In some embodiments the nucleic acid molecules are mRNA. All such nucleic acid molecules can comprise naturally occurring nucleotides or synthetic and/or chemically modified nucleotides—such as those that are modified to increase their stability or otherwise improve their suitability for administration to subjects.
Vectors
[0184] In some embodiments the present invention provides “vectors” that comprise nucleic acid molecules that encode the heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides described herein.
[0185] The term “vector,” as used herein, means a construct suitable for delivery of a nucleic acid molecule to a cell. Examples of vectors include, but are not limited to, viruses, viral-derived vectors, naked DNA or RNA vectors, plasmid vectors, cosmid vectors, phage vectors, and the like. In some embodiments a vector may be an “expression vector” that is capable of delivering a nucleic acid molecule to a cell and that also contains elements required for expression of the nucleic acid molecule in the cell.
[0186] In some embodiments the vectors are viral vectors. Examples of suitable viral vectors include, but are not limited to, adenoviral vectors, adeno-associated virus vectors, retroviral vectors, lentiviral vectors, alphavirus vectors, and vaccinia virus vectors.
Compositions
[0187] The present invention provides various compositions comprising the heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides, nucleic acid molecules, or vectors described herein.
[0188] In some embodiments the compositions described herein comprise one or more additional components suitable for administration to a subject and/or useful in formulating a composition for delivery to a subject, including, but not limited to, diluents, buffers, carriers, stabilizers, dispersing agents, suspending agents, thickening agents, excipients, preservatives, and the like.
[0189] In some embodiments, the compositions described herein also comprise an adjuvant. Adjuvants are well known in the art and any suitable adjuvant can be used. Examples of adjuvants that can be used in the compositions and methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to: inorganic or organic adjuvants, oil-based adjuvants, virosomes, liposomes, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), saponin, saponin QS-21, CpG oligonucleotides, molecular cages for antigens (such as immune-stimulating complexes (“ISCOMS”)), Ag-modified saponin/cholesterol micelles that form stable cage-like structures that are transported to the draining lymph nodes), components of bacterial cell walls, nucleic acids (such as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), and unmethylated CpG dinucleotide-containing DNA), alum, aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydroxide, squalene, Freund's Complete Adjuvant, Freund's Incomplete Adjuvant, and the like.
Delivery Vehicles
[0190] In some embodiments the compositions of the present invention comprise a delivery vehicle. The term “delivery vehicle,” as used herein, refers to a substance useful for the delivery of either a nucleic acid molecule or a peptide to a cell. Examples of delivery vehicles that can be used in conjunction with the present invention include, but are not limited to, nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles, liposomes, lipids, lipid encapsulation systems, polymers, and polymersomes.
Methods of Treatment
[0191] The present invention provides various methods of treatment. For example, in some embodiments the present invention provides methods of treating JAK2 mutant-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in subjects in need thereof, such methods comprising administering to a subject an effective amount of a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition as described herein. In some embodiments such methods involve administering one dose of a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition to the subject. In some embodiments such methods involve administering two or more doses of a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition to the subject. For example, in some embodiments such treatment methods involve administering a priming dose and one or more booster doses of the heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition to the subject. In some embodiments such methods also comprise administering an effective amount of an immune checkpoint inhibitor to the subject. Suitable immune checkpoint inhibitors include PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. In some embodiments the immune checkpoint inhibitor is an anti-PD1 antibody.
[0192] As used herein, the terms “treat,” “treating,” and “treatment” refer achieving, and/or administering an agent or agents (e.g., a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition as described herein) to a subject to achieve, to a detectable degree, an improvement in one or more clinically relevant parameters in a subject (e.g., a subject with a JAK2 mutant-negative MPN), or in a cancer/tumor (e.g. a JAK2 mutant-negative MPN), or in tumor cells (e.g., JAK2 mutant-negative JAK2 mutant-negative MPN tumor cells). Such clinically relevant parameters include, but are not limited to, reducing the rate of growth of a tumor (or tumor cells), halting the growth of a tumor (or of tumor cells), causing regression of a tumor (or of tumor cells), reducing the size of a tumor (for example as measured in terms of tumor volume or tumor mass), reducing the grade of a tumor, eliminating a tumor (or tumor cells), preventing, delaying, or slowing recurrence (rebound) of a cancer/tumor, improving symptoms associated with a cancer/tumor, improving survival from a cancer/tumor, inhibiting or reducing spreading of a cancer/tumor (e.g., metastases), and the like. Importantly, in the context of the present invention, such clinically relevant parameters also include (a) an immune response to a tumor or tumor cells, (b) a CD8+ T cell response to a tumor or tumor cells, (c) an anti-CALR.sup.MUT immune response, (d) an anti-CALR.sup.MUT CD8+ T cell response, and (e) enhanced sensitivity of a tumor or tumor cells to immune checkpoint blockade. All of the above are desirable biological outcomes of the present methods. In some embodiments, the improvement in the one or more clinically relevant parameters is assessed in comparison to a suitable baseline or suitable control. For example, in some embodiments the improvement in the one or more clinically relevant parameters is assessed in comparison to the level/extent of that clinically relevant parameter in the same subject prior to that subject being treated with a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition as described herein. Similarly, in some embodiments the improvement in the one or more clinically relevant parameters is assessed in comparison to the level/extent of that clinically relevant parameter in a suitable control subject or group of control subjects not treated with a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition as described herein (e.g., in a subject or group or group of subjects treated with a placebo). In some embodiments the improvement in the one or more clinically relevant parameters is a statistically significant improvement.
[0193] In some embodiments the present methods and compositions can be used to treat any JAK2 mutant-negative MPN in a subject in need thereof.
[0194] In some embodiments the subject has a tumor that is resistant to treatment using other methodologies and/or compositions. As used herein, the terms “resistant” and “resistance” are used consistent with their normal usage in the art and consistent with the understanding of the term by physicians who treat cancer. For example, consistent with its usual meaning in the art, a tumor or a subject may be considered “resistant” to a certain treatment method or treatment with a certain agent (or combination of agents), if, despite using that method or administering that agent (or combination of agents), a subject's tumor (or tumor cells) grows, and/or progresses, and/or spreads, and/or metastasizes, and/or recurs. In some instances, a tumor may initially be sensitive to treatment with a certain method or agent (or combination of agents), but later became resistant to such treatment.
[0195] As used herein the term “subject” encompasses all mammalian species, including, but not limited to, humans, non-human primates, dogs, cats, rodents (such as rats, mice and guinea pigs), cows, pigs, sheep, goats, horses, and the like—including all mammalian animal species used in animal husbandry, as well as animals kept as pets and in zoos, etc. In preferred embodiments the subjects are human.
[0196] In some embodiments the subject has a JAK2 mutant-negative MPN. In some such embodiments the subject has a JAK2.sup.V617F mutant-negative MPN. In some embodiments the subject has a JAK2 mutant-negative MPN that has recurred following a prior treatment with other compositions or methods, including, but not limited to, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgical resection, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments the subject has a JAK2 mutant-negative MPN that has not previously been treated.
[0197] As used herein the term “effective amount” refers to an amount of an active agent (e.g., a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition) as described herein that is sufficient to achieve, or contribute towards achieving, one or more desirable clinical outcomes, such as those described in the “treatment” description above. An appropriate “effective amount” in any individual case may be determined using standard techniques known in the art, such as dose escalation studies, and may be determined taking into account such factors as the desired route of administration (e.g., systemic vs. intratumoral), desired frequency of dosing, and patient characteristics such as a subject's age, sex, body weight, etc. Furthermore, an “effective amount” may be determined in the context of any co-administration method to be used. One of skill in the art can readily perform such dosing studies (whether using single agents or combinations of agents) to determine appropriate doses to use, for example using assays such as those described in the Examples section of this patent application—which involve administration of the agents described herein to subjects (such as animal subjects routinely used in the pharmaceutical sciences for performing dosing studies). For example, in some embodiments an “effective amount” an active agent (e.g., a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition) as described herein may be calculated based on studies in humans or other mammals carried out to determine efficacy of the active agent.
[0198] In some embodiments one or more of the active agents (e.g., a heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptide, nucleic acid molecule, vector or composition) described herein is used at approximately its maximum tolerated dose, for example as determined in phase I clinical trials and/or in dose escalation studies. In some embodiments one or more of the active agents is used at about 90% of its maximum tolerated dose. In some embodiments one or more of the active agents is used at about 80% of its maximum tolerated dose. In some embodiments one or more of the active agents is used at about 70% of its maximum tolerated dose. In some embodiments one or more of the active agents is used at about 60% of its maximum tolerated dose. In some embodiments one or more of the active agents is used at about 50% of its maximum tolerated dose. In some embodiments one or more of the active agents is used at about 50% of its maximum tolerated dose. In some embodiments one or more of the active agents is used at about 40% of its maximum tolerated dose. In some embodiments one or more of the active agents is used at about 30% of its maximum tolerated dose.
[0199] In carrying out the treatment methods described herein, any suitable method or route of administration can be used to deliver the active agents described herein. In some embodiments systemic administration may be employed, for example, oral or intravenous administration, or any other suitable method or route of systemic administration known in the art. In some embodiments intratumoral delivery may be employed. For example, the active agents described herein may be administered either systemically or locally by injection, by infusion through a catheter, using an implantable drug delivery device, or by any other means known in the art. One of skill in the art will be able to select the appropriate delivery method or route depending on the situation, for example depending on whether active agents or cells are being administered, and in the case of active agents, depending on the nature of the active agent (e.g., its stability, half-life, etc.).
[0200] In certain embodiments the compositions and methods of treatment provided herein may be employed together with other compositions and treatment methods known to be useful for tumor therapy, including, but not limited to, surgical methods (e.g., for tumor resection), radiation therapy methods, treatment with chemotherapeutic agents, treatment with antiangiogenic agents, treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Similarly, in certain embodiments the methods of treatment provided herein may be employed together with procedures used to monitor disease status/progression, such as biopsy methods and diagnostic methods (e.g., MRI methods or other imaging methods).
[0201] For example, in some embodiments the methods described herein may be performed prior to performing surgical resection of a tumor, for example in order to shrink a tumor prior to surgical resection. In other embodiments the methods described herein may be performed both before and after performing surgical resection of a tumor.
[0202] In some embodiments the treatment methods described herein may be employed in conjunction with performing a diagnostic test to determine if the subject has a tumor that that is likely to be responsive to therapy. For example, in some embodiments, the treatment methods provided herein comprise performing a diagnostic test to determine if the subject has a JAK2 mutant-negative MPN. Typically, such a test will be performed prior to administering one or more of the active agents (e.g., heteroclitic CALR.sup.MUT peptides, nucleic acid molecules, vectors or compositions) described herein.
[0203] The invention is further described in the following non-limiting Examples.
EXAMPLES
[0204] Numbers in parentheses in these Examples refer to the numbered references in the Reference List that follows this Examples section.
Example 1
Overview
[0205] The majority of JAK2.sup.V617F-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have disease-initiating frameshift mutations in calreticulin (CALR) resulting in a common novel C-terminal mutant fragment (CALRMUT), representing an attractive source of neoantigens for cancer vaccines. However, studies have shown that CALRMUT-specific T cells are rare in CALRMUT MPN patients. The underlying reasons for this phenomenon are unknown. In this study, we examined class-I major histocompatibility complex (MHC-I) allele frequency in CALRMUT MPN patients from two independent cohorts and observed that MHC-I alleles that present CALRMUT neoepitopes with high affinity are under-represented in CALRMUT MPN patients. We believe that this is due to an increased chance of immune-mediated tumor rejection by individuals expressing one of these MHC-I alleles such that the disease never clinically manifests. As a consequence of this MHC-I allele restriction, we hypothesized that CALRMUT MPN patients might not efficiently respond to cancer vaccines composed of the CALRMUT fragment, but might do so when immunized with a properly modified CALRMUT heteroclitic peptide vaccine approach. We found that heteroclitic CALRMUT peptides specifically designed for CALRMUT MPN patient MHC-I alleles efficiently elicited a cross-reactive CD8+ T cell response in human PBMC samples otherwise unable to respond to the matched weakly immunogenic CALRMUT native peptides. We also modeled this effect in mice and observed that C57BL/6J mice, which are unable to mount an immune response to the human CALRMUT fragment, can mount a cross-reactive CD8+ T cell response against a CALRMUT-derived peptide upon heteroclitic peptide immunization and this was further amplified by combining the heteroclitic peptide vaccine with blockade of the immune checkpoint molecule PD-1. Together, our data demonstrate the therapeutic potential of heteroclitic peptide-based cancer vaccines in CALRMUT MPN patients.
INTRODUCTION
[0206] Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are myeloid blood cancers arising from hematopoietic stem cells (1, 2) and are characterized by hyperactivated JAK-STAT signaling (3). The majority of JAK2.sup.V617F-negative MPN tumors have an insertion or deletion (INDEL) mutation in the C-terminal region of calreticulin (CALR) creating a +1 base-pair frameshift (4, 5). While multiple unique INDELs are found, nearly all generate a 44 amino acid common peptide, although a few rare cases generate a shorter 36 amino acid fragment (4, 5). Mutant CALR (CALRMUT) develops a pathogenic binding interaction with the extracellular portion of the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL), inducing ligand-independent constitutive JAK-STAT signaling pathways activation and oncogenesis (6-8). Consequently, the oncogenic CALRMUT fragment is an attractive source of mutational frameshift neoantigens for cancer vaccines in CALRMUT-positive MPN patients (9). However, in the few studies examining CALRMUT fragment immunogenicity, T cells from CALRMUT MPN patients had less immunoreactivity to CALRMUT-derived peptides compared to healthy individuals (10-14), even though many immunogenic peptides are predicted (14, 15). Interestingly, T cells from healthy donors display a stronger and more frequent response to CALRMUT peptides compared to T cells from patients with CALRMUT MPN (13). Additionally, several of the healthy donor T cell responses were elicited by memory T cells (13). This indicates that CALRMUT peptides are immunogenic in normal donors and suggest that CALRMUT-specific immune responses may be a mechanism of immunosurveillance eliminating the early tumor before its clinical manifestation. However, it is not clear how the tumor could escape this level of control in patients with clinical disease and why T cells from these patients did not respond to the CALRMUT fragment.
[0207] For antigens to be recognized by CD8+ T cells they must first be processed into smaller peptides, translocate to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and, if conditions are met, bind to the class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC-I) to form a peptide:MHC-I complex (pMHC-I) capable of reaching the cell surface to be recognized by the T cell receptor (TCR). However, not all peptides fit the stoichiometric requirements for MHC-I binding. Successful pMHC-I binding requires peptides to be the correct length and to have the appropriate anchor residues at specific locations to stabilize binding to pockets of the MHC-I allele (16). However, MHC genes have evolved to be extremely polymorphic across populations. Humans encode two copies of three different MHC-I genes, human leukocytes antigens (HLA)-A, HLA-B and HLA-C, with each having hundreds or thousands of polymorphisms (17). Importantly, different polymorphic residues alter the anchor residues such that peptides that bind to some MHC-I alleles may not bind to others (18, 19). As a result, the sum of presented peptides can vary greatly across individuals. We therefore hypothesized that some individuals possess the ability to present CALRMUT-derived peptides and eliminate early CALRMUT-positive MPNs, while other individuals do not and are more likely to develop the disease.
[0208] Since many peptides possess some but not all stoichiometric requirements for pMHC-I binding, affinities can range from strong to weak with many intermediate affinities possible. This affinity affects the number of surface-bound pMHC-I available for recognition by CD8+ T cells (20) and ultimately their activation. Notably, naïve T cells require higher levels of antigen stimulation than antigen-experienced T cells to potentiate T cell activation (21-26) and some antigens may be unable to activate naïve T cells. However, heteroclitic peptides (also known as anchor-optimized or anchor-improved peptides) are peptides in which one or two residues are specifically altered in order to increase MHC binding affinity. These resulting strong MHC-binding peptides robustly activate naïve T cells, and are similar enough to the original peptides that the activated T cells cross react with the original antigen (27-30), assuming that the original antigen has an adequate intermediate binding affinity.
[0209] In this study, we investigated two independent MPN patient cohorts and found that six MHC-I alleles predicted to efficiently bind to multiple CALRMUT-derived peptides were less frequently observed in CALRMUT MPN patients. This strongly pointed to a higher risk of developing CALRMUT MPN in patients lacking these MHC-I alleles and, at the same time, suggested to us that individuals with these MHC-I alleles could potentially control primordial CALRMUT-expressing tumors as part of the immunoediting process. In addition, this suggested to us that CALRMUT positive MPN patients are unlikely to respond to cancer vaccines composed of the CALRMUT fragment. Therefore, we analyzed the CALRMUT fragment for peptides that could be modified into heteroclitic peptides and serve as more potent anti-CALRMUT vaccines. We first tested this approach in in vitro assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors unable to respond to CALRMUT peptides and found that the same T cells could be induced to release IFNγ when primed using heteroclitic peptides. Then, to verify whether heteroclitic CALRMUT peptides can control the growth of CALRMUT tumors in vivo, we tested them as a vaccine in a pre-clinical mouse model. We established that C57BL/6J mice, which were unable to mount an immune response against the original CALRMUT fragment, had significantly delayed tumor growth when given a heteroclitic peptide vaccine of the same specificity and that this was further enhanced by PD1 blockade.
Results & Discussion
CALRMUT MPN Patients Demonstrate Skewed MHC Allele Frequencies
[0210] We investigated MHC-I and MHC-II allele frequencies in CALRMUT and JAK2.sup.V617F MPN patients using haplotypes collected from two medical centers in the Northeastern United States (NEUS). In parallel, we assessed MHC-I allele frequencies of patients with MPN from eight medical centers in Denmark in order to independently validate the results observed in the NEUS cohort. MHC-II haplotypes were unavailable for the Danish cohort. As MHC allele frequencies vary greatly by geographic location (31), we analyzed each cohort separately. Furthermore, since the NEUS cohort is 88% Caucasian, we also compared MHC-I and MHC-II allele frequencies to those found in the US Caucasian population from the National Marrow Donor Program (17). To test for MHC-I and MHC-II allele frequency differences, we performed a principal component analysis comparing MHC-I and MHC-II allele frequencies from both NEUS MPN groups and the general US Caucasian population. We observed that the JAK2.sup.V617F MPN group clusters in proximity to the US Caucasian group, while the CALRMUT MPN group is isolated for both MHC-I (
Skewing of MHC-I Allele Frequencies is Associated with CALRMUT Peptide Binding Affinity
[0211] To determine if there are any correlations between MHC-I and MHC-II allele frequency skewing to the binding of the peptides derived from the 44 amino-acid mutant protein fragment, we compared the predicted binding affinity of the CALRMUT-derived peptides to each MHC-I and MHC-II allele with over- or under-represented frequencies using NetMHCpan 3.0 and NetMHCIIpan 3.2, respectively. Five of the six under-represented MHC-I alleles (except HLA-B*44:02) had a moderate predicted affinity (<10000 nM) to approximately a quarter of all 9-mer peptides of which many had <500 nM predicted affinity (
[0212] We did not observe the same trend for MHC-II alleles. Both MHC-II alleles found at higher frequency in CALRMUT MPN patients were predicted to bind strongly to more than half of 15-mer peptides, whereas only one of the four MHC-II alleles found at lower frequency appears to do so (
[0213] Thus, here we show that patients with CALRMUT-positive MPNs were less likely to possess an MHC-I allele predicted to bind to peptides derived from the CALRMUT fragment. This may be due to the fact that individuals with MHC-I alleles that can bind to CALR-derived peptides are less likely to develop CALRMUT MPN.
MHC-I Skewing in CALRMUT MPN is Specific for CALRMUT-Derived Peptides
[0214] Prediction algorithms for pMHC-I binding based on neural networks like NetMHC are generally accepted to be useful yet imperfect tools, and their biases are typically hard to capture. To control for the prediction algorithm, we hypothesized that MHC-I allele frequency bias should not be observed for proteins or protein fragments that are not under selective immune pressure. To test this, we scored the predicted binding affinity of each CALRMUT-derived peptide or other irrelevant proteins in each individual MPN patient to generate what we have termed the Patient:Peptide Score (PPS). Briefly, the PPS of a peptide in a patient is equal to the binding score (nM) of that peptide against the MHC-I allele with the highest predicted binding affinity of the six possible MHC-I alleles for that peptide (
[0215] Therefore, we hypothesized that one approach to elicit an immune response against CALRMUT in these patients is to use a vaccine consisting of MHC-I binding-optimized heteroclitic peptides. To test this hypothesis, we examined the peptides with the lowest PPS in the CALRMUT MPN patients as possible candidates. We observe that the top peptide in both cohorts is the 9mer CALRMUT peptide starting at position 2 (CALR9p2) RMMRTKMRM (SEQ ID NO. 263) (
Non-Responding Human PBMCs can Cross-React with CALR9p2 if First Primed with Heteroclitic Peptides
[0216] We next investigated whether heteroclitic peptides could be used to induce cross-reactivity against CALRMUT-derived peptides in human samples. To identify the best candidate CALR9p2 heteroclitic peptide, we examined the mean predicted PPS score of the NEUS CALRMUT MPN cohort to every possible CALR9p2 peptide variant containing a single amino acid substitution (
[0217] PBMCs from six healthy HLA-A*02:01 individuals with known MHC-I haplotypes and PPS were stimulated for 10 days with a cytokine cocktail in the presence of: CALR9p2, each heteroclitic peptide individually, all heteroclitic peptides pooled, or a positive control peptide mixture of T cell epitopes from Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, Influenza and Clostridium Tetani (CEFT). Cells were then restimulated with control peptides, initial priming peptides, or in the case of heteroclitic peptide stimulation conditions, the CALR9p2 peptide and tested for IFNγ production (
Modeling CALRMUT MPN Patient MHC-I Allele Skewing in Mice
[0218] To determine whether a heteroclitic peptide cancer vaccine is a viable strategy against the CALRMUT fragment, we tested this approach in a pre-clinical mouse model mimicking CALRMUT MPN MHC-I allele skewing. We analyzed the predicted binding of all CALRMUT-derived peptides against all murine MHC-I alleles for which predictions are possible. We found no strong binding peptide (<500 nM) to all murine MHC-I alleles but did observe that H-2Kb has a weakly binding predicted affinity to CALR9p2. When tested for its ability to stabilize MHC-I in the H-2Kb-expressing TAP-deficient RMA/S cell line, CALR9p2 did not elicit detectable H-2Kb stabilization compared to the control strong binding chicken ovalbumin (OVA)-derived peptide SIINFEKL (SEQ ID NO. 287) (
[0219] We posited that this mouse model is a good preclinical model candidate of CALRMUT MPN patients mimicking an MHC-I skewed haplotype because we observe poor but detectable binding of CALR9p2 to H-2Kb but no vaccine-induced CALR9p2-specific CD8+ T cell responses in B6 mice.
Full-Length CALRMUT Variant does not have Dominant-Negative Activity
[0220] We wanted to investigate whether the CALRMUT fragment itself could inhibit antigen presentation. Wildtype CALR is required for antigen-presentation in healthy cells (34, 35) and the full-length CALRMUT is reported to be non-functional with respect to peptide loading (35). However, nearly all CALRMUT-positive MPN tumors are heterozygous (4, 5) and therefore have one wild-type copy of CALR, yet it is unknown whether CALRMUT acts as a dominant-negative with respect to its role in antigen presentation. To exclude this possibility, we co-transfected the murine B16F10 cells with the DNA sequences encoding OVA and either CALRWT-mCherry, CALRMUT-mCherry or the mCherry constructs, and measured surface expression of H-2Kb-presented SIINFEKL peptide. We observed that cells transfected with the CALRMUT variant had an equal percentage of H-2Kb-SIINFEKL (SEQ ID NO. 287) peptides expressing cells (
C57BL/6J-Optimized Heteroclitic CALR9p2 Peptide Elicits Cross-Reactive Immunity in Mice
[0221] To identify the best candidate CALR9p2 heteroclitic peptide in C57BL/6J (B6) mice, we examined the predicted binding affinity of H-2Kb to every possible CALR9p2 peptide variant containing a single amino acid substitution. We observed that the variant with the strongest predicted affinity has a threonine (T) to phenylalanine (F) substitution at position 5 (T5F) of the CALR9p2 peptide (
[0222] To confirm that the same TCR clones were recognizing both CALR9p2(T5F) and CALR9p2, CD8+ T cells from CALR9p2(T5F)-immunized mice were restimulated in vivo with CALR9p2, and CALR9p2(T5F)-tetramer-specific CD8+ T cells were examined for IFNγ restimulation. The only CALR9p2-potentiated CD8+ T cells were those also staining for the CALR9p2(T5F)-tetramer (
[0223] To test the ability of a CALRMUT heteroclitic peptide vaccine to elicit a cross-reactive anti-tumor response in vivo, we used the newly developed PresentER antigen minigene system (38). Here, the nucleotide sequence of the CALR9p2 peptide is cloned downstream of an ER signal sequence (SS) and virally transduced into TAP-deficient RMA/S cells (RMA/SpER-CALR9p2). Once expressed, the peptide-SS is shuttled into the ER and the peptide is cleaved from the SS, releasing CALR9p2 into the ER where it can be loaded into MHC-I, assuming binding is possible. When mice were given three doses of the heteroclitic peptide vaccine prior to tumor implantation, RMA/SpER-CALR9p2 tumors grew significantly slower than those injected into mice given adjuvant alone or with the CALR9p2 peptide, which both grew at the same rate (
[0224] Interestingly, the therapeutic vaccine had greater efficacy than the prophylactic vaccine. As this was unexpected, we hypothesized that CALR9p2-specific cross-reactive CD8+ T cells were diminishing in efficacy over time and that the available CALR9p2 antigen present in the tumor cells was not generating a strong memory response. To investigate this further, we immunized mice with three doses of the heteroclitic CALR9p2(T5F) peptide vaccine and compared cross-reactive potential in conditions where mice instead received CALR9p2 peptide boosts following an initial CALR9p2(T5F) priming dose. Consistent with the prophylactic vaccine results, mice that received an initial CALR9p2(T5F) followed by two CALR9p2 boosts had no detectable cross-reactive CD8+ T cell responses to CALR9p2 in vitro and a very small response to the CALR9p2(T5F) peptide (
[0225] Together, the results of this study provide proof of principle for the use of a heteroclitic peptide cancer vaccine strategy for tumor cells expressing CALRMUT antigens. Such a vaccine could provide a valuable non-redundant benefit in CALRMUT MPN patients, as there are currently no rationally designed treatments specially targeting the CALR mutation. While the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib is approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with MPN, this approval was granted primarily based on symptomatic benefits (53, 54). Although CALRMUT MPN patients demonstrate clinical responses to ruxolitinib, there is no reduction in CALRMUT allele burden following JAK2 inhibition and as a result ruxolitinib does not have substantial disease-modifying activity in MPN and is not curative (55). Mutations in CALR are disease-initiating in MPN and often occur as the sole mutation (4).
[0226] We plan to perform clinical trials. Initial clinical trials of heterolytic CALRMUT directed vaccination approaches as described herein will focus primarily on safety and will be performed in patients with more advanced MPN. A longer-term goal will be to treat CALRMUT MPN patients early in the course of their disease before genetic and clonal evolution has occurred. By directing autologous immune responses specifically against CALRMUT, peptide vaccination offers the potential to preferentially target the disease-initiating MPN stem cell in patients, which is a deficiency of current MPN drugs, including JAK inhibitors. Accordingly, CALRMUT targeted peptide vaccination offers the potential to definitely eradicate MPN to cure the disease.
[0227] Importantly, while our work suggests that certain patients are not likely to respond to a cancer vaccine composed solely of the CALRMUT fragment due to MHC-I skewing, we believe that these patients are likely to respond to a heteroclitic peptide cancer vaccine as demonstrated in our pre-clinical model. Furthermore, as our data shows that this strategy can be enhanced with immune checkpoint blockade (anti-PD-1/PD-L1), an off-the-shelf vaccine composed of one or more of the heteroclitic CALRMUT peptides described herein in combination with anti-PD-1 or other checkpoint inhibitor therapies, can be a viable strategy for CALRMUT MPN patients.
Methods
Patient Samples
[0228] Approval was obtained for the use of patient-derived specimens and access to clinical data extracted from patient charts by the Institutional Review Boards at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the Massachusetts General Hospital, as well as by the Danish Regional Science Ethics Committee. All patients analyzed in this study were diagnosed with MPN and tested positive for the CALRMUT or JAK.sup.V617F mutations.
Mice
[0229] C57BL/6J mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Sacramento, Calif.). Mouse experiments were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines under a protocol approved by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All mice were maintained in a pathogen-free facility according to the National Institutes of Health Animal Care guidelines.
MHC Allele Frequencies
[0230] For the NEUS cohort, MHC genotypes were manually extracted from patient charts. For the Danish cohort, HLA class I genotypes were determined by next-generation sequencing performed on bio-banked samples collected for a previous study (56) using recently described methods (57). In cases where NMDP allele codes were used instead of the World Health Organization nomenclature, the conversion was done according to https://bioinformatics.bethematchclinical.org/hla-resources/allele-codes/allele-code-lists/. If multiple alleles were plausible for a given NMDP allele code, we selected the most likely allele based on ethnicity (typically around 99% confidence, based on known frequencies in the general population (17)). MHC allele frequency for each HLA gene (A, B, C, DQ, and DR) was broadly calculated as the number of each specific allele divided by the number of the total allele in that cohort (2n per individual). In rare samples, certain patients had incomplete haplotype information where one or more alleles were unknown or incomplete. If the allele was missing, it was censored from the number of total alleles. If locus and group were known (ex: HLA-A*02) but the exact protein was unknown (ex: HLA-A*02:XX), this allele was censored from the frequency calculation only for alleles from the same group. For an MHC allele to be considered positively skewed, it was required to have an allele frequency of >0.05 in CALRMUT MPN cases and have >0.2 fold frequency increase compared to both the JAK2.sup.V617F and US Caucasian population groups allele frequency in the NEUS cohort, or a >0.125 fold frequency increase compared to the JAK2.sup.V617F group allele frequency in the Danish cohort. Likewise, for an MHC allele to be negatively skewed, it was required to have a frequency of at least 0.05 in both the JAK2.sup.V617F and US Caucasian population groups for the NEUS cohort, or just the JAK2.sup.V617F group for the Danish cohort, and have >0.2 fold decrease in the CALRMUT MPN compared to both the JAK2.sup.V617F and US Caucasian population groups allele frequency in the NEUS cohort, or a >0.125 fold frequency decrease compared to the JAK2.sup.V617F group allele frequency in the Danish cohort. Principal component analysis was calculated in R and plotted in Graphpad Prism 7. All data processing and analysis were performed using the R version 3.3.2 Sincere Pumpkin Patch and GraphPad Prism v7.
Binding Affinity Predictions and Patient:Peptide Score (PPS)
[0231] pMHC-I binding predictions were collected using NetMHCpan v3 (32) for human MHC-I alleles and NetMHC v4 (36) for murine MHC-I alleles. pMHC-II binding predictions were collected using NetMHCIIpan v3.2 (58). To calculate the PPS, peptide affinities for all six possible MHC-I alleles were identified and only the lowest affinity value was retained. The protein fragment RRMMRTKMRMRRMRRTRRKMRRKMSPARPRTSCREACLQGWTEA (SEQ ID NO. 288) was used for the CALRMUT. For the CALRWT sequence, amino acids 1-361 of the UniProt sequence P27797 was used. For the Influenza neuraminidase sequence, the full UniProt sequence D7ED91 was used. All subsequent data processing and analyses were performed using the R version 3.3.2 Sincere Pumpkin Patch and GraphPad Prism v7.
MHC-I Stabilization Assay
[0232] To test peptide binding to murine H-2Kb or human HLA-A*02:01, TAP-deficient RMA/S and T2 cells were used, respectively, as previously reported (59, 60). Briefly, RMA/S cells (61) were serum-starved in serum-free RPMI media overnight at 31° C., and peptides were added at indicated final concentrations, followed by 30 minutes at 31° C. and another 3 hours at 37° C. before measuring H-2Kb by flow cytometry (BD; Clone AF6-88.5). T2 cells (62) were serum-starved in serum-free RPMI media overnight and cells were added at indicated final concentrations for 16 hours before measuring HLA-A*02:01 levels by flow cytometry (BD; Clone BB7.2). The SIINFEKL (SEQ ID NO. 287) peptide was acquired as a custom order from Genscript. The MART1-A2 peptide (ELAGIGILTV, SEQ ID NO. 289) was purchased from JPT Peptide Technologies.
Murine Immunizations and IFNγ ELISpot Assay
[0233] All peptides were purchased as custom peptide synthesis orders from GenScript at a purity of >98% and resuspend at 10 mg/mL in DMSO (Sigma). For peptide vaccines, peptides were diluted in PBS and emulsified with Titermax® (Titermax USA, Inc) at a 1:1 ratio immediately prior to immunization, such that each dose was composed of 10 μg peptide in a total volume of 25 uL. In control (DMSO) immunization, an equivalent volume of DMSO is substituted for the diluted peptide in the TiterMax® emulsion. For subsequent in vitro assays, draining inguinal and popliteal lymph nodes were collected at indicated time points and CD8+ T cells were isolated using positive magnetic sorting using mouse CD8a (Ly-2) MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec). DNA vaccines were performed using a gene gun as previously described (27, 63) according to indicated time points. Briefly, mice received four injections (400 lbs/inch2) of DNA-coated gold particles into the abdominal region of the skin for a total 4 μg of DNA per dose. DNA plasmids encoding the wildtype or 52 base-pair deletion CALRMUT sequences fused with the flag sequence are as previously described (64). For pING-OVA, the full-length chicken ovalbumin sequence was cloned into the pING plasmid (65). CD8+ T cells were collected as before, but only from draining inguinal lymph nodes. To test for antigen-specificity, the mouse IFNγ ELISpot set (BD) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, CD8+ T cells were frozen immediately after purification in FBS containing 10% DMSO, thawed one day prior to restimulation and allowed to recover overnight in 20 U/mL IL-2 (Peprotech) RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), Na-Pyruvate, L-glutamine and Penicillin/Streptomycin. As a source of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), splenocytes from naïve mice were depleted of T cells using magnetic microbeads for CD8a (Ly2) and CD4 (L3T4) (Miltenyi Biotec), pulsed for one hour with 100 μg/mL peptide at 37° C. followed by a wash. For each well, 105 CD8+ T cells were co-culture with 1×105-3×105 peptide-pulsed APCs and incubated for approximately 18 hours. Spots were counted using the ImmunoSpot analyzer (Cellular Technology Limited).
SIINFEKL (SEQ ID NO. 287) H-2Kb Expression
[0234] B16F10 were co-transfected with equal parts pING-OVA and pCMV-Sport6-CALR constructs fused to mCherry, which are previously described (64), using the Megatran 1.0 transfection reagent (Origene). Each construct was mixed with the transfection reagent separately such that all cells received the same amount of pING-OVA construct. B16F10 cells were originally obtained from I. Fidler (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center) and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 7.5% inactivated FBS, 1×non-essential amino acids and 2 mM L-glutamine. One day after transfection, cells were stained by flow cytometry with H-2Kb (BD; Clone AF6-88.5) and H-2Kb-SIINFEKL (SEQ ID NO. 287) (Biolegend; Clone 25-D1.16).
Tumor Growth Experiments
[0235] RMA/S cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 7.5% inactivated FBS, 1×non-essential amino acids and 2 mM L-glutamine. The DNA sequence encoding the CALR9p2 peptide (bold) was cloned into the PresentER-IRES-GFP (38) construct using the following oligo:
TABLE-US-00016 (SEQ ID NO. 290) 5′GGCCGTATTGGCCCCGCCACCTGTGAGCGG GAGGATGATGAGGACAAAGATGAGGATGTAAGGCC AAACAGGCC-3′
following SfiI digestion and T4 ligation (New England Biolabs). The resulting construct was used to generate retrovirus by co-transfection with pCL-Ampho into ecotropic Pheonix cells (ATCC). Viral supernatants were collected at 48 and 72 hours, pooled and Retro-X Concentrator (Takara Bio USA)-concentrated retrovirus was used to transduce RMA/S cells by spinoculation using polybrene (Sigma). GFP-positive cells were FACS sorted (BD FACSAria III) and cultured in 4 μg/mL puromycin (Gibco) media. A total of 5×106 cells were injected subcutaneously in the flank of mice. For anti-PD1 treatment, 250 μg of RMP1-14 was injected intra-peritoneally in PBS at indicated time points.
Human PBMC In Vitro Restimulation
[0236] Freshly isolated or thawed cryopreserved healthy donor PBMCs were restimulated with cytokines and peptides as previously described (14). Briefly, on day 0, PBMCs were resuspended in X-VIVO15 media (Lonza) and seeded at 105 per well of a 96 U-bottom plate with 1000 IU/mL GM-CSF (Sanofi), 500 IU/mL IL-4 (R&D Systems) and 50 ng/mL Flt3L (R&D Systems). On day 1, media was refreshed with 0.1 μg/mL LPS (Invivogen), 10 μM R848 (Invivogen), 5 μg/mL IL-10 (R&D Systems) and 1 μg/mL of indicated peptides, and incubated for 24 hours. The CMV, EBV, Flu, Tetanus (CEFT) and the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptide pools (JPT Technologies) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. On days 2 and 5, half the media was refreshed with RPMI (Gibco) containing 10% human serum (Gemini Bio-Products), 10 ug/ml gentamycin (Gibco), HEPES (Gibco), GlutaMAX (Gibco) and hIL-2 and hIL-7 to a final concentration of 10 IU/mL and 10 ng/mL, respectively (R&D Systems). On day 8, the media was refreshed without cytokines. On day 10, PBMCs were restimulated with corresponding peptides in the presence of 1 μg/mL of anti-hCD28 and anti-hCD49d (BD Biosciences). As controls, some cells were stimulated with PMA (Sigma-Aldrich, 50 ng/mL) and ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, 1 μg/mL). For intracellular staining, monensin and brefeldin A (BD Biosciences) were added 1 hour after restimulation cells and culture left to incubate for another 12 hours. Cells were then stained for CD3 (Clone: OKT3, FITC), CD4 (Clone: RPA-T8, APC) and CD8a (Clone: RPA-T4, BV785), permeabilized and fixed with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm™ reagents according to manufacturer's protocol and subsequently stained for IFNγ (Clone: B27, PE) and TNFα (Clone: Mab11, PE/Cy7). All antibodies were purchased BioLegend. LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain Kit by Thermo Fischer Scientific was used for live and dead cell discrimination. Data was acquired using the BD Fortessa and the data was analyzed on FlowJo V10 (TreeStar). For the ELISpot, methods are as previously described (14) using the follower 15-mer peptides that cover the entire CALRMUT fragment: RTRRMMRTKMRMRRM (SEQ ID NO. 291), MMRTKMRMRRMRRTR (SEQ ID NO. 292), TKMRMRRMRRTRRK (SEQ ID NO. 293), RMRRMRRTRRKMRRK (SEQ ID NO. 294), MRRTRRKMRRKMSPA (SEQ ID NO. 295), RRKMRRKMSPARPRT (SEQ ID NO. 296), RRKMSPARPRTSCRE (SEQ ID NO. 297), SPARPRTSCREACLQ (SEQ ID NO. 298), PRTSCREACLQGWTE (SEQ ID NO. 299), TSCREACLQGWTEA (SEQ ID NO. 300).
Statistical Analysis
[0237] Details of the study outline, sample size, and statistical analysis are shown in the main Example text, above and in, the Figures and Brief Description of the Figures. To calculate significance in distribution of MHC frequencies, Barnard's unconditional test and the chi-square test were used as indicated in R using the barnard.test function (two-tail) from the Barnard package and as well as the base chisq.test function. The R version 3.3.2 Sincere Pumpkin Patch was used. For unpaired Student's t tests, area under the curve calculations and log-rank survival test, GraphPad Prism v7 was used.
Example 2
[0238] Additional CALR.sup.MUT heteroclitic peptides were designed utilizing a novel algorithm that we designed specifically to identify and select heteroclitic peptides likely to be useful for vaccination of as large a proportion of the general population as possible. In brief, this entailed first identifying native CALR.sup.MUT peptides likely to be good starting points for the generation of heteroclitic mutants/derivatives based on their predicted utility for vaccination of the greatest number of patients (based on HLA-I allele diversity). Then mutations of these “native” peptides were evaluated based on certain criteria to identify heteroclitic mutants. The conditions for a mutant peptide to be considered heteroclitic in a given individual were: 1) that the native peptide from which it was derived had a predicted binding affinity to a given HLA-I expressed by that individual of between 500 nM and 2000 nM (i.e. intermediate binding HLA-I), and 2) that the mutation altered the predicted binding affinity of the peptide to at least one of the intermediate binding HLA-Is in that individual to <500 nM. From that first subset of mutants identified as being heteroclitic using those two criteria, a second subset having a predicted HLA-I binding affinity of <100 nM was identified—as these were predicted to have the best immunogenicity. Our algorithm assigned scores to all of the heteroclitic peptides based on various criteria including their likely utility across multiple ethnic groups (Caucasian, African, Asian and Hispanic) and across multiple HLA phenotypes. The amino acid sequences of the subset of 262 heteroclitic derivatives having the best scores as determined by this method are provided in Table 1 (SEQ ID NOs 1-262). An analysis of the amino acid sequences of these 262 peptides in comparison to the native CALR.sup.MUT peptide from which they were derived, identified certain common features of the mutant heteroclitic derivatives—which common features are described by the various consensus amino acid sequences provided in Table 2. Seven of the mutant heteroclitic derivatives were tested functionally in living human cells and/or in mice, as described in Example 1, providing proof of concept for the design approach and for the utility of the designed mutant heteroclitic peptides.
REFERENCE LIST
[0239] 1. R. L. Levine, D. G. Gilliland, Myeloproliferative disorders. Blood 112, 2190-2198 (2008). [0240] 2. P. J. Campbell, A. R. Green, The myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med 355, 2452-2466 (2006). [0241] 3. Rampal et al., Integrated genomic analysis illustrates the central role of JAK-STAT pathway activation in myeloproliferative neoplasm pathogenesis. Blood 123, e123-133 (2014). [0242] 4. Nangalia et al., Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Engl J Med 369, 2391-2405 (2013). [0243] 5. Klampfl et al., Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Engl J Med 369, 2379-2390 (2013). [0244] 6. Elf et al., Mutant Calreticulin Requires Both Its Mutant C-terminus and the Thrombopoietin Receptor for Oncogenic Transformation. Cancer Discov 6, 368-381 (2016). [0245] 7. Chachoua et al., S. N. Constantinescu, Thrombopoietin receptor activation by myeloproliferative neoplasm associated calreticulin mutants. Blood 127, 1325-1335 (2016). [0246] 8. Araki et al., Activation of the thrombopoietin receptor by mutant calreticulin in CALR-mutant myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 127, 1307-1316 (2016). [0247] 9. How & Hobbs, A. Mullally, Mutant calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 134, 2242-2248 (2019). [0248] 10. Holmstrom et al., The CALR exon 9 mutations are shared neoantigens in patients with CALR mutant chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leukemia 30, 2413-2416 (2016). [0249] 11. Holmstrom et al., The calreticulin (CALR) exon 9 mutations are promising targets for cancer immune therapy. Leukemia 32, 429-437 (2018). [0250] 12. Tubb, et al., Isolation of T cell receptors targeting recurrent neoantigens in hematological malignancies. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 6, 70 (2018). [0251] 13. Holmstrom et al., High frequencies of circulating memory T cells specific for calreticulin exon 9 mutations in healthy individuals. Blood Cancer J 9, 8 (2019). [0252] 14. Cimen Bozkus, et al., Immune Checkpoint Blockade Enhances Shared Neoantigen-Induced T Cell Immunity Directed against Mutated Calreticulin in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Cancer Discov, (2019). [0253] 15. Schischlik et al., Mutational Landscape of the Transcriptome Offers Putative Targets for Immunotherapy of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Blood, (2019). [0254] 16. Madden, The three-dimensional structure of peptide-MHC complexes. Annu Rev Immunol 13, 587-622 (1995). [0255] 17. Gragert et al., Six-locus high resolution HLA haplotype frequencies derived from mixed-resolution DNA typing for the entire US donor registry. Human immunology 74, 1313-1320 (2013). [0256] 18. Falk et al., Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules. Nature 351, 290-296 (1991). [0257] 19. Rammensee et al., MHC ligands and peptide motifs: first listing. Immunogenetics 41, 178-228 (1995). [0258] 20. Boulanger et al., Dalchau, A Mechanistic Model for Predicting Cell Surface Presentation of Competing Peptides by MHC Class I Molecules. Front Immunol 9, 1538 (2018). [0259] 21. Ericsson et al., Differential activation of phospholipase C-gamma 1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase in naive and antigen-primed CD4 T cells by the peptide/MHC ligand. Journal of immunology 156, 2045-2053 (1996). [0260] 22. Kimachi et al., The minimal number of antigen-major histocompatibility complex class II complexes required for activation of naive and primed T cells. Eur J Immunol 27, 3310-3317 (1997). [0261] 23. London et al., Functional responses and costimulator dependence of memory CD4+ T cells. Journal of immunology 164, 265-272 (2000). [0262] 24. Pihlgren et al., Resting memory CD8+ T cells are hyperreactive to antigenic challenge in vitro. The Journal of experimental medicine 184, 2141-2151 (1996). [0263] 25. Rogers et al., Qualitative changes accompany memory T cell generation: faster, more effective responses at lower doses of antigen. Journal of immunology 164, 2338-2346 (2000). [0264] 26. Slifka et al., Functional avidity maturation of CD8(+) T cells without selection of higher affinity TCR. Nat Immunol 2, 711-717 (2001). [0265] 27. Dyall et al., Heteroclitic immunization induces tumor immunity. The Journal of experimental medicine 188, 1553-1561 (1998). [0266] 28. Rosenberg, et al., White, Immunologic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Nature medicine 4, 321-327 (1998). [0267] 29. England, et al., Molecular analysis of a heteroclitic T cell response to the immunodominant epitope of sperm whale myoglobin. Implications for peptide partial agonists. Journal of immunology 155, 4295-4306 (1995). [0268] 30. Boehncke, et al., The importance of dominant negative effects of amino acid side chain substitution in peptide-MHC molecule interactions and T cell recognition. Journal of immunology 150, 331-341 (1993). [0269] 31. Gonzalez-Galarza, et al., Allele frequency net 2015 update: new features for HLA epitopes, KIR and disease and HLA adverse drug reaction associations. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D784-788 (2015). [0270] 32. Nielsen & Andreatta, NetMHCpan-3.0; improved prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules integrating information from multiple receptor and peptide length datasets. Genome Med 8, 33 (2016). [0271] 33. Hoof, et al., NetMHCpan, a method for MHC class I binding prediction beyond humans. Immunogenetics 61, 1-13 (2009). [0272] 34. Gao, et al., Assembly and antigen-presenting function of MHC class I molecules in cells lacking the ER chaperone calreticulin. Immunity 16, 99-109 (2002). [0273] 35. Arshad, et al., Tumor-associated calreticulin variants functionally compromise the peptide loading complex and impair its recruitment of MHC-I. J Biol Chem 293, 9555-9569 (2018). [0274] 36. Andreatta & Nielsen, Gapped sequence alignment using artificial neural networks: application to the MHC class I system. Bioinformatics 32, 511-517 (2016). [0275] 37. Nielsen, et al., Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations. Protein Sci 12, 1007-1017 (2003). [0276] 38. Gejman, et al., Rejection of immunogenic tumor clones is limited by clonal fraction. Elife 7, (2018). [0277] 39. Dunn, et al., The three Es of cancer immunoediting. Annu Rev Immunol 22, 329-360 (2004). [0278] 40. Teng, et al., From mice to humans: developments in cancer immunoediting. The Journal of clinical investigation 125, 3338-3346 (2015). [0279] 41. Hanahan, et al., Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646-674 (2011). [0280] 42. O'Donnell, et al., Cancer immunoediting and resistance to T cell-based immunotherapy. Nature reviews. Clinical oncology 16, 151-167 (2019). [0281] 43. Efremova, et al., Targeting immune checkpoints potentiates immunoediting and changes the dynamics of tumor evolution. Nat Commun 9, 32 (2018). [0282] 44. Rizvi, et al., Molecular Determinants of Response to Anti-Programmed Cell Death (PD)-1 and Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Blockade in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Profiled With Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing. J Clin Oncol 36, 633-641 (2018). [0283] 45. Turajlic et al., Insertion-and-deletion-derived tumour-specific neoantigens and the immunogenic phenotype: a pan-cancer analysis. Lancet Oncol 18, 1009-1021 (2017). [0284] 46. Linnebacher, et al., Frameshift peptide-derived T-cell epitopes: a source of novel tumor-specific antigens. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer 93, 6-11 (2001). [0285] 47. Posthuma, et al., Niederwieser, HLA-B8 and HLA-A3 coexpressed with HLA-B8 are associated with a reduced risk of the development of chronic myeloid leukemia. The Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Blood 93, 3863-3865 (1999). [0286] 48. Kuzelova, et al., Altered HLA Class I Profile Associated with Type A/D Nucleophosmin Mutation Points to Possible Anti-Nucleophosmin Immune Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. PloS one 10, e0127637 (2015). [0287] 49. Sharma, et al., Primary, Adaptive, and Acquired Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy. Cell 168, 707-723 (2017). [0288] 50. Rodig, et al., MHC proteins confer differential sensitivity to CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade in untreated metastatic melanoma. Sci Transl Med 10, (2018). [0289] 51. Li, et al., T cell receptor signalling in the control of regulatory T cell differentiation and function. Nature reviews. Immunology 16, 220-233 (2016). [0290] 52. Klebanoff, et al., Therapeutic cancer vaccines: are we there yet? Immunological reviews 239, 27-44 (2011). [0291] 53. Harrison, et al., JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 366, 787-798 (2012). [0292] 54. Verstovsek, et al., A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med 366, 799-807 (2012). [0293] 55. Guglielmelli, et al., Investigators, Ruxolitinib is an effective treatment for CALR-positive patients with myelofibrosis. British journal of haematology 173, 938-940 (2016). [0294] 56. Knudsen et al, Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Interferon Alpha-2 Vs. Hydroxyurea in Polycythemia Vera: Preliminary Results from the Three-Year Analysis of the Daliah Trial—a Randomized Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial. Blood 132, 580-580 (2018). [0295] 57. Jan, et al., Recurrent genetic HLA loss in AML relapsed after matched unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood Adv 3, 2199-2204 (2019). [0296] 58. Jensen, et al., Improved methods for predicting peptide binding affinity to MHC class II molecules. Immunology 154, 394-406 (2018). [0297] 59. Houghton, et al., Immunological validation of the EpitOptimizer program for streamlined design of heteroclitic epitopes. Vaccine 25, 5330-5342 (2007). [0298] 60. Guevara-Patino, et al., A. N. Houghton, Optimization of a self antigen for presentation of multiple epitopes in cancer immunity. The Journal of clinical investigation 116, 1382-1390 (2006). [0299] 61. Hosken & Bevan, An endogenous antigenic peptide bypasses the class I antigen presentation defect in RMA-S. The Journal of experimental medicine 175, 719-729 (1992). [0300] 62. Salter, et al., Cresswell, Genes regulating HLA class I antigen expression in T-B lymphoblast hybrids. Immunogenetics 21, 235-246 (1985). [0301] 63. Weber, et al., Tumor immunity and autoimmunity induced by immunization with homologous DNA. The Journal of clinical investigation 102, 1258-1264 (1998). [0302] 64. Elf, et al., Defining the requirements for the pathogenic interaction between mutant calreticulin and MPL in MPN. Blood 131, 782-786 (2018). [0303] 65. Wolchok, et al., DNA vaccines: an active immunization strategy for prostate cancer. Semin Oncol 30, 659-666 (2003).