AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS DEVICE

Abstract

Provided is an automatic analysis device that estimates causes of change in measurement values of a quality-control substance. An automatic analysis device that analyzes specimens includes an acquisition unit that acquires amount of change in measurement values of a quality-control substance used for quality control, a calculation unit that calculates a change prediction amount on the basis of a difference value in concentration values of a standard solution used for calibration before and after changing lots, and an estimation unit that estimates causes of change occurring in measurement values of the quality-control substance on the basis of results of comparing the amount of change and the change prediction amount.

Claims

1. An automatic analysis device for analyzing a sample, the automatic analysis device comprising: an acquisition unit configured to acquire a variation amount of a measurement value of a quality control substance used for quality control; a calculation unit configured to calculate a predicted variation amount based on a difference value between concentration values of a calibration solution used for calibration before and after a lot change; and an estimation unit configured to estimate a cause of variation occurring in the measurement value of the quality control substance based on a comparison result between the variation amount and the predicted variation amount.

2. The automatic analysis device according to claim 1, wherein the calculation unit calculates the predicted variation amount based on a display difference value which is a difference value between display values of a concentration of the calibration solution before and after the lot change and a measurement difference value which is a difference value between measurement values of the concentration of the calibration solution before and after the lot change, and the estimation unit estimates that the lot change of the calibration solution is the cause of variation when the variation amount is within a range of the predicted variation amount.

3. The automatic analysis device according to claim 2, wherein the estimation unit estimates that the lot change of the calibration solution is not the cause of variation when the measurement value of the quality control substance and the measurement value of the concentration of the calibration solution have different variation directions.

4. The automatic analysis device according to claim 2, wherein when the estimation unit estimates that the lot change of the calibration solution is the cause of variation, an input value of the concentration value of the calibration solution calculated based on the predicted variation amount is displayed.

5. The automatic analysis device according to claim 4, wherein the input value is displayed in a daily difference variation graph indicating a shift in the measurement value of the quality control substance.

6. The automatic analysis device according to claim 2, wherein when the estimation unit estimates that the lot change of the calibration solution is the cause of variation, the measurement value of the quality control substance is corrected based on the display difference value and the measurement difference value.

7. The automatic analysis device according to claim 2, wherein when the estimation unit estimates that the lot change of the calibration solution is not the cause of variation, the measurement difference value is displayed in a daily difference variation graph indicating a shift in the measurement value of the quality control substance.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0009] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of a configuration of an automatic analysis device.

[0010] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a configuration of an electrolyte measurement unit.

[0011] FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a daily difference variation graph which shows a periodic measurement result of a quality control substance.

[0012] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a daily difference variation graph in which a variation occurs in measurement values of the quality control substance due to a lot change of a calibration solution.

[0013] FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a flow of processing according to a first embodiment.

[0014] FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a flow of processing for estimating a cause of variation.

[0015] FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a display example when a variation occurs in measurement values of the quality control substance due to the lot change of the calibration solution.

[0016] FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a display example of an input value guide.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0017] Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of an automatic analysis device according to the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the following description and the accompanying drawings, components that have the same function and configuration are denoted by the same reference numerals, and repeated descriptions thereof are omitted. The drawings schematically represent the embodiments, and a real object may be shown in a simplified manner.

First Embodiment

[0018] An example of a configuration of an automatic analysis device 1 will be described with reference to FIG. 1. The automatic analysis device 1 includes a sample disk 2, a reagent disk 4, a reaction container 5, a reagent dispensing unit 6, a sample dispensing unit 7, an electrolyte measurement unit 8, an interface 9, a computer 10, an input unit 11, an output unit 12, and a photometer 13.

[0019] On the sample disk 2, sample cups 3 each containing a sample such as blood or urine supplied from a patient or a standard sample used for calibration and quality control are concentrically arranged and loaded. The sample cups 3 may not be loaded on the sample disk 2 but on a sample rack in which the sample cups 3 are arranged on a straight line.

[0020] The standard sample used for calibration includes a standard solution having a known concentration of a specific component and a calibration solution. The standard solution is a solution containing the specific component, and has at least a concentration in the vicinity of an upper limit value and a concentration in the vicinity of a lower limit value of a measurement range of the automatic analysis device 1. That is, at least two standard solutions are used. The calibration solution is a solution that simulates a sample supplied from the patient.

[0021] Reagents to be reacted with a sample or the like are stored on the reagent disk 4. Each reagent is dispensed into the reaction container 5 from the reagent disk 4 by the reagent dispensing unit 6. Further, the sample or the like is dispensed into the reaction container 5 from a sample cup 3 by the sample dispensing unit 7. The reagent, the sample, and the like that are dispensed into the reaction container 5 react and develop a color by being maintained at a predetermined temperature, and absorbance of a color-developed liquid is measured by the photometer 13. The reagent disk 4, the reaction container 5, the photometer 13, and the like related to absorbance measurement are collectively referred to as colorimetric units.

[0022] The electrolyte measurement unit 8 is a unit that measures potential of an electrolyte solution obtained by diluting the sample or the standard sample, and will be described later with reference to FIG. 2.

[0023] The computer 10 controls units connected through the interface 9, calculates a concentration value of the specific component based on results measured by the colorimetric units or the electrolyte measurement unit 8, and outputs the calculated concentration value to the output unit 12. The output unit 12 is, for example, a liquid crystal monitor, a touch panel, or a printer, and displays and prints the concentration value of the specific component output from the computer 10. Measurement conditions and the like in the colorimetric units or the electrolyte measurement unit 8 may be received from the input unit 11. The input unit 11 is, for example, a keyboard or a mouse, and when the output unit 12 is a touch panel, a graphical user interface (GUI) displayed on the touch panel functions as the input unit 11.

[0024] An example of a configuration of the electrolyte measurement unit 8 will be described with reference to FIG. 2. The electrolyte measurement unit 8 is a unit that measures a concentration of ions contained in the sample or the standard sample, and includes an electrolyte concentration calculation unit 14, a potentiometer 15, a dilution tank 18, a Cl electrode 19, a K electrode 20, a Na electrode 21, a pinch valve 22, and a reference electrode 23.

[0025] In the dilution tank 18, the sample or the standard sample dispensed from the sample cup 3 by the sample dispensing unit 7 is diluted by the diluent 17 to a concentration suitable for measurement. The diluted sample or the diluted standard sample is passed through the Cl electrode 19, the K electrode 20, and the Na electrode 21 by operations of the pinch valve 22. Potential corresponding to ion concentrations of Cl ions, K ions, and Na ions contained in the passing-through solution is generated in the Cl electrode 19, the K electrode 20, and the Na electrode 21, respectively. In addition, since potential corresponding to a concentration of a reference electrode solution 24 is also generated in the reference electrode 23, a potential difference between each of the Cl electrode 19, the K electrode 20, and the Na electrode 21 and the reference electrode 23 is measured by the potentiometer 15. Prior to measurement of a potential difference of the diluted sample or the diluted standard sample, a potential difference of an internal standard solution 16 with respect to the reference electrode solution 24 is measured as a reference potential of the electrolyte measurement unit 8. The potential difference measured by the potentiometer 15 is sent to the electrolyte concentration calculation unit 14.

[0026] The electrolyte concentration calculation unit 14 is a calculation unit that converts the potential difference measured for the sample into the ion concentrations of the Cl ions, the K ions, and the Na ions contained in the sample, and includes, for example, a central processing unit (CPU) and a memory. The computer 10 may function as the electrolyte concentration calculation unit 14. In order to convert the measured potential difference into the concentration of the specific component, a calibration curve, which is a straight line representing a relationship between the potential difference and the concentration, is used. The calibration curve is created by executing calibration including measurement of a potential difference of a plurality of standard solutions having known concentrations or a calibration solution.

[0027] Specifically, an inclination of the calibration curve is calculated by setting a potential difference measured for a standard solution having a low concentration and a potential difference measured for a standard solution having a high concentration on a vertical axis and setting concentrations of the two standard solutions on a horizontal axis. Further, a segment of the calibration curve having the calculated inclination is calculated based on the potential difference measured for the calibration solution and a concentration of the calibration solution. The calibration curve created by calibration is stored in the electrolyte concentration calculation unit 14, and is read and used when a concentration of the sample or a quality control substance is calculated.

[0028] The quality control will be described with reference to FIG. 3. In order to execute quality control on the automatic analysis device 1, it is periodically confirmed, according to a daily difference variation graph or the like, that a measurement value of the quality control substance having a known concentration is within a range of quality control. FIG. 3 is an example of the daily difference variation graph in which a vertical axis represents measurement values of the quality control substance having a known Na concentration and a horizontal axis represents measurement dates, and it is confirmed daily that the measurement values of the concentration of the quality control substance are between upper and lower limit values. The upper and lower limit values are set for each quality control substance, and for example, the quality control may range from (average value - 2 × standard deviation) to (average value + 2 × standard deviation) based on an average value and standard deviation when the same quality control substance is measured a plurality of times.

[0029] A variation of the measurement value of the quality control substance will be described with reference to FIG. 4. FIG. 4 is an example of the daily difference variation graph in which a variation occurs in measurement values of the quality control substance, and shows a case in which a lot of the calibration solution is changed to 2020/1/14. To create the calibration curve used for calculating the concentration of the quality control substance, a concentration value of the calibration solution provided by a reagent manufacturer and the potential difference measured for the calibration solution are used. Hereinafter, the concentration value of the calibration solution provided by the reagent manufacturer is referred to as a display value. The display value is input into the automatic analysis device by an operator through the input unit 11. When the display value of the calibration solution is denoted by an integer of, for example, 140, an actual concentration of the calibration solution has a width of 139.5 to 140.4. That is, even in a case of the calibration solution having the same display value of 140, actual concentration values between different lots may have a maximum difference of 0.9, and the measurement value of the quality control substance may vary due to use of a different calibration curve according to a difference of an actual concentration value. A cause of variation in the measurement value of the quality control substance is not limited to a lot change of the calibration solution. If the operator misjudges the cause of variation, it takes a long time to deal with the variation.

[0030] Therefore, in the present embodiment, the cause of variation in the measurement value of the quality control substance is estimated based on a comparison result between a predicted variation amount, which is calculated based on a difference value between the concentration values of the calibration solution used for calibration before and after the lot change, and a variation amount of the measurement value of the quality control substance.

[0031] An example of a flow of processing according to the present embodiment will be described for each step with reference to FIG. 5.

S501

[0032] The computer 10 causes the colorimetric units or the electrolyte measurement unit 8 to measure the standard solution and the calibration solution, and executes calibration. Specifically, the inclination of the calibration curve is calculated based on measurement values of absorbance or potential differences of the standard solutions having a low concentration and a high concentration and the concentrations of the two standard solutions. Further, a segment of the calibration curve having the calculated inclination is calculated based on measurement values of absorbance or a potential difference of the calibration solution and the display value of the concentration of the calibration solution.

[0033] When the lot of the calibration solution is changed, a calibration curve is created based on a display value C.sub.N of a concentration of a new lot calibration solution, which is the calibration solution after the lot change, and a measurement value for the new lot calibration solution, and the calibration curve is stored together with the lot change of the calibration solution. In addition to the created calibration curve, a display value C.sub.o of a concentration of an old lot calibration solution, which is the calibration solution before the lot change, is stored together with the display value C.sub.N of the new lot calibration solution. Further, the measurement values of the absorbance or the potential differences for the old lot calibration solution and the new lot calibration solution are also stored. When the lot of the calibration solution is not changed, the calibration curve is created and stored based on the display value C.sub.o of the old lot calibration solution and the measurement value for the old lot calibration solution.

S502

[0034] The computer 10 causes the colorimetric units or the electrolyte measurement unit 8 to measure concentration values of at least two quality control substances. Specifically, a measurement value of absorbance or a potential difference of each quality control substance is converted into a concentration value of the quality control substance by the calibration curve calculated in S501. The calculated concentration value may be displayed in the daily difference variation graph.

S503

[0035] The computer 10 determines whether a variation is present in the concentration values of the quality control substances measured in S502. Presence or absence of the variation is determined based on, for example, a comparison between an average value of past measurement values ± 2 . standard deviation and the measurement value in S502. Since a measurement value of 120.9 of 2020/1/14 in FIG. 4 is out of a range of 119.8 to 120.2 determined based on an average value of 120.0 of measurement values from 2020/1/1 to 2020/1/13 and a standard deviation of 0.1, it is determined that the variation is present. When the variation is present in the concentration value of the quality control substance, the process proceeds to S504, and when the variation is absent, the process proceeds to S505. A difference between the average value of the past measurement values and the measurement value in S502 is acquired as the variation amount of the measurement value of the quality control substance. That is, the computer 10 functions as an acquisition unit that acquires the variation amount of the measurement value of the quality control substance.

S504

[0036] The computer 10 estimates the cause of variation in the measurement value of the concentration of the quality control substance.

[0037] An example of a flow of processing in the present step will be described with reference to FIG. 6.

S601

[0038] The computer 10 determines whether the lot of the calibration solution is changed. When the lot is changed, the process proceeds to S602, and when the lot is not changed, the process proceeds to S608.

S602

[0039] The computer 10 determines whether the measurement value of each quality control substance satisfies a predetermined condition. The predetermined condition is, for example, a condition in which the number of times of measurement for the measurement value of each quality control substance is equal to or greater than a predetermined number of times, a coefficient of variance (CV) of the measurement value of each quality control substance is equal to or less than a set value, and a variation of the measurement value of each quality control substance is within the set value with respect to a display value. The predetermined number of times is, for example, three times, the set value of the coefficient of variance CV is, for example, 3%, and the set value with respect to the display value is, for example, 3%. When the predetermined condition is satisfied, the process proceeds to S603, and when the predetermined condition is not satisfied, the process proceeds to S608.

S603

[0040] The computer 10 calculates an old lot concentration value and a new lot concentration value of the calibration solution as unknown samples. Specifically, measurement values of absorbance or potential differences for the old lot calibration solution and the new lot calibration solution that are stored in S501 are converted into a concentration value C′.sub.o of the old lot calibration solution and a concentration value C′.sub.N of the new lot calibration solution by the calibration curve created in S501.

S604

[0041] The computer 10 determines whether the measurement value of each quality control substance and the concentration value of the calibration solution have the same variation direction among lots. Specifically, it is determined whether positive or negative of the variation amount acquired in S503 is the same as that of a difference value (C′.sub.N - C′.sub.o) between the concentration values C′.sub.o and C′.sub.N calculated in S603. When the variation directions are the same, the process proceeds to S605, and when the variation directions are different, the process proceeds to S608.

S605

[0042] The computer 10 calculates the predicted variation amount of the concentration value of the quality control substance generated due to the lot change of the calibration solution. That is, the computer 10 functions as a calculation unit that calculates the predicted variation amount. The predicted variation amount is calculated based on a difference value (C.sub.N - C.sub.o) between an old lot display value C.sub.o and a new lot display value C.sub.N of the calibration solution and the difference value (C′.sub.N - C′.sub.o) between the concentration values C′.sub.o and C′.sub.N calculated in S603. More specifically, a ± set value of a difference { (C′.sub.N - C′.sub.o) -(C.sub.N - C.sub.o) } between the difference value (C′.sub.N - C′.sub.o) and the difference value (C.sub.N - C.sub.o) is calculated as the predicted variation amount. For example, 50% is used as the set value.

S606

[0043] The computer 10 determines whether the variation of the measurement value of each quality control substance is within the predicted variation amount. When the variation is within the predicted variation amount, the process proceeds to S607, and when the variation is not within the predicted variation amount, the process proceeds to S608.

S607

[0044] The computer 10 estimates that the cause of variation in the measurement value of the quality control substance is the lot change of the calibration solution. The estimated cause of variation may be displayed in a daily difference variation graph as shown in FIG. 7, for example. In the daily difference variation graph in FIG. 7, a portion where the measurement value of the Na concentration varies is indicated by a marker different from other portions, and a mark for drawing attention and a comment indicating the cause of variation are displayed. Specifically, while other portions are black circular markers, the portion where the measurement value varies is indicated by a white rhombic marker. In addition, “!” is displayed as the mark for drawing attention, and “Concentration varies due to lot change of calibration solution” is displayed as a comment indicating the cause of variation.

S608

[0045] The computer 10 estimates that the cause of variation in the measurement value of the quality control substance is not the lot change of the calibration solution. The estimated cause of variation may be displayed as a comment in the daily difference variation graph. Instead of displaying the comment of the cause of variation, the difference value (C′.sub.N - C′.sub.o) between the measurement values of the concentrations of the calibration solution before and after the lot change may be displayed as a reference.

[0046] According to the flow of processing described above, the cause of variation in the measurement value of the concentration of the quality control substance is estimated. That is, the computer 10 functions as an estimation unit that estimates the cause of variation occurring in the measurement value of the quality control substance. The operator may take a measure according to the estimated cause of variation.

[0047] The description returns to FIG. 5.

S505

[0048] The computer 10 determines whether the concentration value of the quality control substance is within the range of quality control. When the measurement value is within the range of quality control, the process proceeds to S506, and when the measurement value is not within the range, the process returns to S501.

S506

[0049] The computer 10 causes the colorimetric units or the electrolyte measurement unit 8 to measure the sample supplied from the patient. A measurement result is output to the output unit 12.

[0050] According to the flow of processing described above, when the measurement value of the quality control substance varies, the cause of variation is estimated. Since the operator can take an appropriate measure according to the cause of variation estimated by the automatic analysis device 1, subsequent sample measurement is smoothly executed, and quality of the sample measurement is also maintained.

Second Embodiment

[0051] In the first embodiment, estimation of the cause of variation in the measurement value of the quality control substance is described. It is preferable that the operator takes a measure according to the estimated cause of variation. For example, the concentration value of the calibration solution input through the input unit 11 may be changed within a range of display values provided by the reagent manufacturer. In the present embodiment, presentation of a more appropriate input value will be described.

[0052] In many cases, the display value of the calibration solution provided by the reagent manufacturer is in a range of values that can be input, and is denoted by, for example, “140 ± 1” as the display value of Na. Therefore, in the present embodiment, when the process proceeds to S607 in FIG. 6, a more appropriate input value is calculated by the computer 10 and is output to the output unit 12. For example, the display value C.sub.N at which the predicted variation amount calculated in S605 is minimized is calculated within the range of display values provided by the reagent manufacturer, and is output as the more appropriate input value.

[0053] A plurality of input values may be output, and as shown in FIG. 8, a daily difference variation graph created when each input value is used may be displayed as an input value guide. According to the input value guide in FIG. 8, the operator can quickly determine which input value is to be used.

Third Embodiment

[0054] In the first embodiment, estimation of the cause of variation in the measurement value of the quality control substance is described. When the cause of variation is clear, the measurement value of the quality control substance may be corrected according to the cause of variation. Therefore, in the present embodiment, when the process proceeds to S607 in FIG. 6, the measurement value of the quality control substance is corrected according to the variation amount generated due to the lot change of the calibration solution. Specifically, a deviation {(C′.sub.N -C′ .sub.o) - (C.sub.N - C.sub.o) } between the difference value (C′.sub.N - C′.sub.o) between the concentration values of the old and new lots of the calibration solution and the difference value (C.sub.N - C.sub.o) between the display values is subtracted from the measurement value of the quality control substance to execute correction. Whether to correct the measurement value of the quality control substance is selected based on a setting of the operator.

[0055] A plurality of embodiments of the invention are described above. The invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, and the components may be modified without departing from the scope of the invention. A plurality of components disclosed in the above embodiments may be appropriately combined. Further, several components may be omitted from all the components shown in the above embodiments.

TABLE-US-00001 Reference Signs List 1 automatic analysis device 2 sample disk 3 sample cup 4 reagent disk 5 reaction container 6 reagent dispensing unit 7 sample dispensing unit 8 electrolyte 9 interface 10 computer 11 input unit 12 output unit 13 photometer 14 electrolyte concentration calculation unit 15 potentiometer 16 internal standard solution 17 diluent 18 dilution tank 19 C1 electrode 20 K electrode 21 Na electrode 22 pinch valve 23 reference electrode 24 reference electrode solution