PVD Method and Apparatus
20230136705 · 2023-05-04
Inventors
- Scott HAYMORE (Newport, GB)
- Adrian Thomas (Newport, GB)
- Tony WILBY (Newport, GB)
- Stephen BURGESS (Newport, GB)
Cpc classification
International classification
H01L33/00
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
A substrate is positioned on a substrate supporting upper surface of a substrate support. An arrangement of permanent magnets is positioned beneath the substrate supporting upper surface so that permanent magnets are disposed underneath the substrate. The deposition material is deposited into the recesses formed in the substrate by sputtering a sputtering material from a target of a magnetron device. While depositing the deposition material, the arrangement of permanent magnets provides a substantially uniform lateral magnetic field across the surface of the substrate which extends into a region beyond a periphery of the substrate to enhance resputtering of deposited material deposited into the recesses.
Claims
1. A method of depositing a deposition material into a plurality of recesses formed in a substrate by Physical Vapour Deposition (PVD) comprising the steps of: positioning the substrate on a substrate supporting upper surface of a substrate support, wherein an arrangement of permanent magnets is positioned beneath the substrate supporting upper surface so that permanent magnets are disposed underneath the substrate; and depositing the deposition material into the recesses formed in the substrate by sputtering a sputtering material from a target of a magnetron device; in which, during the step of depositing the deposition material, the arrangement of permanent magnets provides a substantially uniform lateral magnetic field across a surface of the substrate which extends into a region beyond a periphery of the substrate to enhance resputtering of deposited material deposited into the recesses.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the arrangement of permanent magnets is positioned beneath the substrate supporting upper surface so that permanent magnets are additionally disposed beyond the periphery of the substrate.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the target and the substrate are separated by a gap of 2.5 to 7.5 cm.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the target and the substrate are separated by a gap of 2.5 to 4 cm.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein a DC power is applied to the target to sputter the material with an applied power density of 0.1 to 5 Wcm.sup.2.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the applied power density is 0.25 to 1 Wcm.sup.−2.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the arrangement of permanent magnets is moveable and, during the step of depositing the deposition material, the arrangement of permanent magnets is subjected to a motion which allows the substantially uniform lateral magnetic field to be provided.
8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the motion that the moveable arrangement of permanent magnets is subjected to is rotation.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the moveable arrangement of permanent magnets is rotated at 2.5 to 15 rpm.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the moveable arrangement of permanent magnets is rotated at 5 to 10 rpm.
11. The method according to claim 7, wherein the motion that the moveable arrangement of permanent magnets is subjected to is a reciprocating motion.
12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the substantially uniform lateral magnetic field, which is provided across the surface of the substrate and extends into the region beyond the periphery of the substrate, has a magnetic field strength in the range 100-500 Gauss (0.01-0.05 Tesla).
13. The method according to claim 1, wherein Ar and/or He is used as a process gas during the step of depositing the deposition material.
14. The method according to claim 1, wherein an RF power is applied to the substrate to produce a DC bias of 100 to 500 V during the step of depositing the deposition material.
15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of depositing the deposition material is performed at a chamber pressure in the range 2 to 150 mTorr.
16. The method according to claim 1, wherein the deposition material is Ti, TiN, Ta, TaN, W, WN, Co, Ru or Cu.
17. The method according to claim 1, wherein the deposition material is deposited by reactive sputtering using hydrogen, nitrogen or oxygen.
18. The method according to claim 1, wherein the recesses are vias.
19. A Physical Vapour Deposition (PVD) apparatus for depositing a deposition material into a plurality of recesses formed in a substrate comprising: a chamber; a magnetron device comprising a target disposed in the chamber from which a sputtering material can be sputtered; and a substrate holder configured to hold a substrate of pre-defined dimensions comprising a substrate support disposed in the chamber; in which: the substrate support comprises a substrate supporting upper surface and an arrangement of permanent magnets positioned beneath the substrate supporting upper surface so that, in use, permanent magnets are disposed underneath the substrate; and wherein the arrangement of permanent magnets is configured to provide, in use, a substantially uniform lateral magnetic field across the surface of the substrate which extends into a region beyond a periphery of the substrate to enhance resputtering of deposited material deposited into the recesses.
20. The PVD apparatus according to claim 19, wherein the arrangement of permanent magnets is positioned beneath the substrate supporting upper surface so that permanent magnets are additionally disposed beyond the periphery of the substrate.
21. The PVD apparatus according to claim 19, wherein, in use, the target and the substrate support are separated by a gap of 2.5 to 7.5 cm.
22. The PVD apparatus according to claim 19, wherein the arrangement of permanent magnets is moveable, and the apparatus further comprises a mechanism configured to subject the arrangement of permanent magnets to a motion which allows the substantially uniform lateral magnetic field to be provided in use.
23. The PVD apparatus according to claim 22, wherein the mechanism is a rotation mechanism for rotating the moveable arrangement of permanent magnets.
24. The PVD apparatus according to claim 19, further comprising a controller which is configured to control the PVD apparatus.
25. The PVD apparatus according to claim 19, further comprising the substrate positioned on the substrate supporting upper surface of the substrate support.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0041] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0050] In
[0051]
[0052] The lower 306 and upper 308 parts of the chuck 202 and the main plate-like body of the substrate supporting surface 304 are typically fabricated using a metal such as aluminium or an alloy such as an aluminium alloy. The outermost portion of the substrate supporting surface 304 which is in contact with the wafer 240 can be coated with a CrO.sub.2 coating to provide improved thermal performance. Surfaces can be frame sprayed or roughened by other means to retain sputtered material as is known to the skilled reader. Rotation of the array of permanent magnets enables a uniform lateral magnetic field to be produced at the wafer surface which in turn gives rise to excellent centre to edge uniformity of deposition across the wafer.
[0053] Experiments were performed using the apparatus shown in
[0054] Surprisingly, it was found that it was possible to avoid closure of the via openings during deposition and achieve excellent base and sidewall coverage of these very high aspect ratio features, due to an enhanced etch performance. One set of experiments were performed with the following operating conditions: 82 mTorr Ar pressure; 0.4 kW Target power (0.46 W/cm.sup.2); 120V DC Bias; rotation of the array of permanent magnet at ca. 5-10 rpm. The resulting step coverage results are shown in Table 1, which indicates that excellent centre to edge uniformity was achieved in the high aspect ratio features. It is notable that even at the edge of the wafer, minimal shadowing (caused by the via profile) was observed. It is believed that enhanced resputtering of material on the wafer surface and within the deep features avoided closure of the vias, and enabled good base coverage and excellent sidewall coverage.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparison of step coverage measured by SEM at the wafer centre and edge. Wafer Wafer Centre Edge Field 100% 100% Side wall 3.8% 6.6% Corner 10.8% 11.9% Bottom 15.7% 13.1%
[0055] A performance comparison was made between the apparatus of the invention shown in
[0056] In the prior art advanced HiFill™ PVD chamber, a high platen DC bias and solenoid coils surrounding the chamber are used in conjunction with a long throw design to improve step coverage. Ti deposition into high aspect ratio vias (25:1) was performed using 1 mT Ar process gas at 40 kW target power (46 W/cm.sup.2), with 450 W RF bias (resulting in 110V DC bias) combined with a target to substrate distance of ca. 350 mm. As shown in
[0057] Using the apparatus of the invention, it is possible to achieve a much higher degree of resputtering. With a target power of 0.25 kW (ca. 0.29 W/cm.sup.2), an RF power of 100 W and a chamber pressure of 3.5 mTorr, a bias of 110V is achieved. However, these conditions resulted in negligible resputtering at the bottom of the via. Base coverage was ca. 5%, which is worse than with the prior art system when a similar pressure was used and a similar DC bias was developed, albeit with a much higher target power This suggests that insufficient deposition is reaching the wafer.
[0058] It is to be noted that a larger degree of resputtering is useful only if the base coverage can be increased. This is because material must first be deposited onto the base of the via for it to be resputtered onto the sidewalls. To achieve a more conformal base coverage required fine tuning of the bias and target power.
[0059] Significant improvement was made to base coverage by substantially increasing Ar pressure to 100 mTorr, to increase scattering, while increasing target power density to 0.4 W/cm2 and substrate DC bias to 123V as can be seen in
[0060] The type of process gas used is another process parameter that can be used to control resputtering. As previously stated, when Ar is used as the process gas, a higher RF power results in enhanced resputtering due to the DC bias on the wafer. The RF power is seen to direct ionized material to the bottom of the via. However, it can be advantageous to selectively direct large quantities of a deposition material such as Ti to the bottom of a via without a large degree of resputtering. This is a way in which coverage of the via bottom may be increased substantially. The use of He gas was investigated using a very high RF power to direct Ti into the via. Due to the small mass of the He ions, the amount of resputtering would be relatively small. Thus, high RF powers could be used to direct Ti into the via without the via opening becoming closed due to resputtering. We found that this scheme works for high DC bias values of greater than 200V, where bottom sidewall coverage of ca. 50% that of the field was observed.
[0061]
[0062] Without wishing to be bound by any particular theory or conjecture, we propose that the relatively strong (100-500 Gauss) uniform magnetic field substantially parallel with the wafer surface reduces electron loss from the RF driven platen assembly. In turn, this increases ionization for a fixed RF power. This produces a more dense plasma which can more efficiently resputter material that is present on the wafer surface and within the via. The magnetic field providing this enhancement in resputtering is not attenuated within the vias. This is in contrast to the immersed coil of prior art systems such as that described in US2018/0327893 A1, which lies above the wafer and provides an enhancement of the plasma in the vicinity of the wafer as long as the plasma is above the wafer. However, the plasma will diminish as it reaches within the via.
[0063] A relatively small target to wafer separation provides a high flux of sputtered material reaching the wafer even at relatively low target power densities (<5 W/cm.sup.2). Through judicious choice of process parameters such as pressure, target power, DC bias and process gas, excellent results can be achieved. A mixture of Ar and He (or other process gas mixtures) could be used to provide a desired process performance. The methodologies and information provided herein can be used directly or readily adapted by the skilled person through routine experimentation to provide excellent results when depositing materials into recessed features by PVD across a wide range of implementations and applications. For example, by introducing a reactive gas such as NO or O.sub.2, a nitride or oxide deposition could be achieved using the present invention.