Device for Printing to a Recording Medium

Abstract

A device for printing to a recording medium with an inkjet printing unit that has at least one nozzle arrangement and is designed to generate a print image on the recording medium. The print image includes at least one test pattern that exhibits at least two different spatial frequencies. The device also has an image acquisition unit that is designed to acquire an image of an acquisition region on the recording medium, which acquisition region includes at least a portion of the test pattern; and a processor that is designed to generate image data corresponding to the image and determine a functional state of the nozzle arrangement, by means of the image data, using a neural network.

Claims

1. A device for printing to a recording medium, comprising: an inkjet printing unit that has at least one nozzle arrangement and is designed to generate a print image on the recording medium, wherein the print image comprises at least one test pattern that exhibits at least two different spatial frequencies; an image acquisition unit that is designed to acquire an image of an acquisition region on the recording medium, which acquisition region comprises at least a portion of the test pattern; and a processor that is designed to generate image data corresponding to the image, and to determine a functional state of the nozzle arrangement based on the image data, using a neural network.

2. The device according to claim 1, wherein the test pattern comprises at least two periodic patterns that respectively have a different period.

3. The device according to claim 1, wherein the inkjet printing unit is designed to move the recording medium along a transport direction upon generating the print image; and wherein the test pattern comprises at least two periodic patterns that are arranged successively in the transport direction and that are respectively periodic in a direction orthogonal to the transport direction.

4. The device according to claim 3, wherein the test pattern has at least one region that comprises a sequence of printed and unprinted regions in the transport direction.

5. The device according to claim 2, wherein the periodic patterns comprise a sequence of printed and unprinted regions.

6. The device according to claim 1, wherein the nozzle arrangement comprises a plurality of nozzles that are designed to eject ink droplets in a direction of the recording medium in order to generate the print image.

7. The device according to claim 6, wherein the processor is designed to determine based on the image data, using the neural network, whether and which nozzles of the nozzle arrangement are not functioning properly.

8. The device according to claim 6, wherein the test pattern is designed such that all nozzles of the nozzle arrangement are used in generating the test pattern.

9. The device according to claim 6, wherein the test pattern is designed such that all nozzles of the nozzle arrangement that are used in the generation of the test pattern are used for the same duration.

10. The device according to claim 6, wherein the inkjet printing unit is designed to move the recording medium along a transport direction upon generating the print image; wherein the test pattern comprises at least two periodic patterns that are arranged successively in the transport direction and are respectively periodic in a direction orthogonal to the transport direction; and wherein the test pattern is designed such that at least two of the nozzles are used to generate a respective one of the two periodic patterns.

11. The device according to claim 1, wherein the acquisition region comprises the entire test pattern.

12. The device according to claim 1, wherein the processor is designed to determine a functional state of the nozzle arrangement, based on the image data and an information about a print width of the print image, using the neural network.

13. The device according to claim 1, wherein the neural network has been trained by training image data that have been generated from images of printed recording media.

14. The device according to claim 1, wherein the neural network has been trained by training image data that have been generated via a simulation of a printing process.

15. A method for monitoring a functional state of a nozzle arrangement of an inkjet printing unit, comprising: generating a print image on a recording medium, wherein the print image comprises at least one test pattern that exhibits at least two different spatial frequencies; acquiring an image of an acquisition region on the recording medium that comprises at least a portion of the test pattern; generating corresponding image data from the image; and determining the functional state of the nozzle arrangement based on the image data and using a neural network.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the test pattern comprises at least two periodic patterns that respectively have a different period.

17. The method according to claim 15, further comprising moving the recording medium along a transport direction upon generating the print image; and wherein the test pattern comprises at least two periodic patterns that are arranged successively in the transport direction and that are respectively periodic in a direction orthogonal to the transport direction.

18. The method according to claim 15, wherein the neural network has been trained by training image data that have been generated from images of printed recording media.

19. The method according to claim 15, wherein the neural network has been trained by training image data that have been generated via a simulation of a printing process.

20. The device according to claim 3, wherein the periodic patterns comprise a sequence of printed and unprinted regions.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0013] Further features and advantages of the invention result from the claims and the following description of preferred embodiments, which are described using the accompanying drawings. Individual features of the embodiments and all combinations thereof, as well as in combination with individual features or feature groups of the preceding specification and/or in combination with individual features or feature groups of the claims with one another in any manner, are deemed disclosed.

[0014] Shown are:

[0015] FIG. 1 a schematic depiction of a device for printing to a recording medium, according to an exemplary embodiment;

[0016] FIG. 2 a schematic depiction of an example of a test pattern of the device according to FIG. 1;

[0017] FIG. 3 a schematic depiction of an example of a neural network as is used in the device according to FIG. 1;

[0018] FIG. 4 a flow chart of a method for monitoring a functional state of a nozzle arrangement of an inkjet printing device according to an exemplary embodiment.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0019] FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of a device 100 for printing to a recording medium 102, according to an exemplary embodiment.

[0020] The device 100 according to FIG. 1 is, by way of example, designed for printing to a recording medium 102 in the form of a belt. In other embodiments, the device 100 is designed for printing to recording media 102 in the form of sheet or page or plate. The recording medium 102 is transported through the device 100 along the transport direction P, which is represented by an arrow. The recording medium 102 may be produced from paper, paperboard, cardboard, metal, plastic, textiles, a combination thereof, and/or other materials that are suitable and can be printed to.

[0021] The device 100 comprises an inkjet printing unit 104 having at least one nozzle arrangement 106. The nozzle arrangement 106 comprises a plurality of nozzles 108 that are respectively designed to fire ink droplets onto the recording medium 102, or eject ink droplets in the direction of the recording medium 102, in order to generate dots that form the print image. The nozzle arrangement 106 may, for example, comprise multiple thousands of effectively utilized nozzles 108 that are arranged parallel to the recording medium 102 and transverse to the transport direction P.

[0022] Since the nozzles 108 of the nozzle arrangement 106 are arranged transverse to the transport direction P, the failure of one or more nozzles 108 leads to streaks in the print image. In order to ensure an intended function of the nozzle arrangement 106, the print image comprises a test pattern 200 (see FIG. 2) that is evaluated by the device 100. The test pattern 200 is described in detail in the following using FIG. 2.

[0023] To evaluate the test pattern 200, the device 100 comprises an image acquisition [recording] unit 110, for example a scanner unit or a camera. The image acquisition unit 110 is downstream of the nozzle arrangement 106 in the transport direction P and is designed to acquire [record] an image of an acquisition region on the recording medium 102. The acquisition region comprises at least one part of the test pattern 200, but preferably the entire test pattern 200.

[0024] The device 100 also comprises a processor 112 that is connected with the inkjet printing unit 104 and with the image acquisition unit 110. The processor 112 is on the one hand designed to control the inkjet printing unit 104 in order to print the print image onto the recording medium 102 depending on print data. On the other hand, the processor 112 is designed to generate image data corresponding to the image and, by means of the image data, to determine a functional state of the nozzle arrangement 106 using a neural network 300 (see FIG. 3). What is to be understood by the functional state of the nozzle arrangement 106 is in particular whether and which of the nozzles 108 are not functioning as intended. For example, one or more nozzles 108 may not be printing because they are fouled or their nozzle openings are filled with air. Such a failure may be statistically predictable, meaning that a nozzle 108 fails with a certain probability, but generally the failure is unpredictable. However, a failure of a nozzle may also be systemic, meaning that the nozzle fails totally, or in defined and reproducible situations, for example after a defined number of operations without a pause. A functioning of a nozzle 108 that is not as intended may also exist in that the nozzle 108 does not correctly place its dot, or does not set it with the correct size. The determination of the functional state of the nozzle arrangement 106 using the neural network 300 is described in detail in the following using FIG. 3.

[0025] FIG. 2 is a schematic depiction of an example of a test pattern 200 of the device 100 according to FIG. 1.

[0026] Shown above in FIG. 2 is the test pattern 200 as it is printed on the recording medium 102. The test pattern 200 comprises eight periodic patterns 202a through 202h that are arranged successively in the transport direction P, which travels from bottom to top in FIG. 2. The periodic patterns 202a through 202h have, for example, the same width in the transport direction P and consist of a sequence of printed and unprinted regions that respectively run transverse to the transport direction P. The periodic patterns 202a through 202h essentially form eight lines that follow one another in the transport direction P.

[0027] A first line and a second line respectively have a period that corresponds to approximately the width of two nozzles 108.

[0028] This means that, in the first two periodic patterns 202a, 202b, the width of a printed or unprinted region respectively corresponds to the width of a nozzle 108. The first two periodic patterns 202a, 202b are arranged such that an unprinted region in the second line follows a printed region in the first line, and vice versa. Regions whose width corresponds to a respective nozzle width and that are periodic in the transport direction P are hereby created in the test pattern 200. A third and fourth line respectively have a period that corresponds to twice the period of the first two lines. The width of a printed or unprinted region of the second two periodic patterns 202c, 202d thus respectively corresponds to two nozzle widths. The third and fourth periodic pattern 202c, 202d are also arranged such that, in the transport direction P, a respective unprinted region follows a printed region, and vice versa. In the following lines, the periods double every two lines, such that the width of a printed or unprinted region of a seventh and eighth line respectively corresponds to eight nozzle widths. Two respective periodic patterns 202a through 202h with the same period are thereby arranged such that, in the transport direction P, the printed regions and the unprinted regions are arranged alternating.

[0029] In the shown exemplary embodiment, the various spatial frequencies of the test pattern 200 are realized by the periodic patterns 202a through 202h. The periods of the periodic patterns 202a through 202h thereby respectively correspond to a spatial frequency. The test pattern 200 shown in FIG. 2 is especially optimized for use in inkjet printers. In particular, due to this design, all nozzles 108 of the nozzle arrangement 106 are operated with the same incidence upon generation of the test pattern 200. In particular, the shown test pattern 200 can be continued periodically. The test pattern 200 may hereby be used for different print widths without needing to modify the test pattern 200 for this purpose.

[0030] By way of example in the depiction according to FIG. 2, the test pattern 200 has four error regions 204a through 204d. These error regions 204a through 204d are continuously unprinted or incorrectly printed in the transport direction P, and have been generated by improperly functioning nozzles 108. A first, second, and fourth error region 204a, 204b, 204d have respectively been generated by a single improperly functioning nozzle 108. A third error region 204c has been generated by two adjacent improperly functioning nozzles 108.

[0031] Shown below in FIG. 2 is the image of the test pattern 200 that the image acquisition unit 110 has acquired. The resolution of the image acquisition unit 110 is lower than the pitch of two dots on the recording medium 102, such that—especially in the first four lines, which correspond to the print lines 202a through 202d—the printed and unprinted regions are no longer distinguishable without taking further measures. However, white regions 206a through 206d are apparent in the image of the test pattern 200 where error regions 204a through 204d occur in said test pattern 200. These white regions 206a through 206d are detected by the neural network 300 and associated with a respective one or more improperly functioning nozzles 108 corresponding to the error regions 204a through 204d.

[0032] FIG. 3 is a schematic depiction of an example of a neural network 300 as it is used in the device 100 according to FIG. 1.

[0033] The neural network 300 consists of a plurality of layers 302, 304, 306 in succession. With the exception of an input layer 302 and an output layer 306, an output of a layer 304 is an input of a following layer 304. Each of the layers 302, 304, 306 comprises one or more filter kernels. In the shown exemplary embodiment, the input layer 302 has one level for a respective color channel of the template and of the scan of the test pattern. In the convolutional intermediate layers 304, the filter kernels respectively represent different interpretations of the processed image information; for example, a filter kernel may be especially sensitive to vertical edges or rectangular elements of the test pattern 200. The number of filter kernels in the intermediate layers 304 is variable in principle. Upon transitioning from one of the intermediate layers 304 to the next, the activations of the subsequent intermediate layers 304 is calculated by the filter kernels from the activations of the preceding intermediate layers 304. In this way, template and scan of the test pattern 200 are strongly offset against one another.

[0034] The layers have a plurality of what are known as neurons, which have a plurality of inputs and typically one or more outputs. The inputs of the neurons are weighted by means of weighting factors, modified by a transfer function of the respective neuron, and finally output. The values of the weighting factors are decisive for the output 308 of the neural network 300. These are established by training the neural network 300 and typically are no longer modified afterward.

[0035] Image data 310a that correspond to the acquisition region on the recording medium 102 or to a portion of the recording medium 102, and image data 310b that correspond to the test pattern 200 without the error regions 204a through 204d, are input to the neural network 300 shown in FIG. 3. In addition, an information about the dimensions of an actual printed region on the recording medium 102 may be input to the neural network 300. The output 308 of the neural network 300 is the functional state of the nozzle arrangement 106. The output layer 306 may, for example, have a single neuron whose output indicates whether the nozzle arrangement 106 is functioning properly or not. However, it is advantageous if the output layer 306 has a plurality of neurons that are associated with a corresponding number of nozzles 108 and whose output respectively indicates whether the respective associated nozzles 108 are functioning properly or not.

[0036] The output of a neuron of the output layer 306 may be binary, i.e. may indicate whether the nozzle arrangement 106 or individual nozzles 108 are functioning properly or not. However, the output of a neuron of the output layer 306 may also reflect a confidence value that indicates with what probability the nozzle arrangement 106 or individual nozzles 108 are functioning properly or not. In the latter instance, it is assumed that the nozzle arrangement 106 or individual nozzles 108 are not functioning properly if the probability is greater than a predetermined threshold.

[0037] The training of the neural network 300 takes place using a training image data set. The training image data set consists of image data that correspond to a plurality of images that have respective different error regions 204a through 204d. These error regions 204a through 204d respectively correspond to improperly functioning nozzles 108 of the nozzle arrangement 106, wherein which error regions 204a through 204d have been generated by which improperly functioning nozzles 108 is known for the training image data set. The training image data set may be generated in that a plurality of print images is generated and acquired with the device 100. Alternating non-functioning nozzles 108 are thereby simulated in that specific nozzles 108 are alternately not activated. Alternatively, the training image data set may also be generated by a simulation of the printing process. It is also possible to post-process the acquired print images in order to, for example, simulate an optical distortion or other variances before they are added to the training image data set (what is known as augmentation).

[0038] FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method for monitoring a functional state of a nozzle arrangement 106 of an inkjet printing unit 104 according to an exemplary embodiment.

[0039] The method may in particular be implemented with the device 100 according to FIG. 1. The method is started in step S400. In step S402, the print image is generated on the recording medium 102 by means of the inkjet printing unit 104. The print image thereby comprises a test pattern 200 having at least one periodic pattern, in particular the test pattern 200 according to FIG. 2.

[0040] In step S404, the image of the acquisition region on the recording medium 102 is detected. The image may comprise the entire test pattern 200. The image may preferably also comprise only a portion of the test pattern 200. Since the test pattern 200 is periodic, the evaluation of the total test pattern 200 is divided up. The computation cost for the neural network 300 is hereby reduced.

[0041] In step S406, corresponding image data are generated from the acquired image. In step S408, the functional state of the nozzle arrangement 106 is determined by means of the image data and using the neural network 300. If only a subsection of the test pattern 200 was acquired in step S404, steps S404 through S408 are repeated for the remaining portions of the test pattern 200 in order to determine the functional state of all nozzles 108 of the nozzle arrangement 106. Finally, the method is ended in step S410.

Reference List

[0042] 100 device

[0043] 102 recording medium

[0044] 104 inkjet printing unit

[0045] 106 nozzle arrangement

[0046] 108 nozzle

[0047] 110 image acquisition unit

[0048] 112 processor

[0049] 200 test pattern

[0050] 202a through 202h pattern

[0051] 204a through 204d error region

[0052] 206a through 206d region

[0053] 300 neural network

[0054] 302, 304, 306 layer

[0055] 308 output

[0056] 310a, 310b image data

[0057] P transport direction