COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHODS FOR GENERATING 3D GARMENT MODELS

Abstract

The invention relates to computer implemented methods for generating a garment finish preset comprising assembly instructions for a garment finish for a garment to be fabricated, for automatically generating a garment finish preset comprising assembly instructions for a garment finish for a garment to be fabricated, and for automatically determining at least one candidate from a plurality of garment finish presets, each of said garment finish presets comprising assembly instructions for a garment finish for a garment to be fabricated from garment panels.

Claims

1. A computer implemented method, with program code being stored on a machine readable medium for automatically generating a 3D garment model representing a garment to be fabricated from garment panels, the computer implemented method comprising: providing one or more documents comprising a plurality of 2D pattern pieces representing the garment panels; determining with a pattern recognition algorithm: a garment type indicator for at least one of the 2D pattern pieces, the garment type indicator representing a type of a garment that the respective first garment panel belongs to and being one of a plurality of garment type indicators stored on the machine readable medium; and a panel pose indicator for each of the 2D pattern pieces, the panel pose indicator representing an estimated position and an estimated orientation of the respective garment panel within the garment; and generating the 3D garment model based on the 2D pattern pieces, the at least one garment type indicator, and the panel pose indicators.

2. The computer implemented method according to claim 1, further comprising adding default finishes to the 3D garment model based on at least one of the at least one garment type indicator and the panel pose indicators.

3. The computer implemented method according to claim 1, further comprising generating a 2D panel model for each of the 2D pattern pieces, wherein generating the 3D garment model is based on draping a reference object with the 2D panel models.

4. The computer implemented method according to claim 3, further comprising: positioning and orienting the 2D panel models based on the panel pose indicators, while, before, or after positioning and orienting the 2D panel models, shaping each of the 2D panel models into 3D panel models so as they adapt to a shape of the reference object based on the at least one garment type indicator, and the panel pose indicators, and generating the first 3D garment model by virtually assembling the 3D panel models along their respective edges.

5. The computer implemented method according to claim 1, wherein for determining a garment type indicator and the panel pose indicator, the pattern recognition algorithm is configured for analyzing at least one of: a shape of the 2D pattern piece, a proportion of the 2D pattern piece relative to the other 2D pattern pieces, textual information associated with the 2D pattern piece in the respective document, whether the 2D pattern piece is at least in part symmetrical or not, and an amount of provided 2D pattern pieces.

6. A computer implemented method, with program code being stored on a machine readable medium for virtually finishing a 3D garment model representing a garment to be fabricated without finishes or with default finishes, the computer implemented method comprising: providing the 3D garment model; providing one or more documents comprising human-readable garment finishing instructions for finishing the garment; determining with an extraction algorithm at least one garment finish feature from the one or more documents, the garment finish feature corresponding to an additional garment component or a garment property and being indicative for a position and an orientation of the respective additional garment component or garment property within the garment; and virtually finishing the 3D garment model based on the determined at least one garment finish feature.

7. The computer implemented method according to claim 6, wherein virtually finishing the second 3D garment model comprises modifying at least a part of the 3D garment model.

8. The computer implemented method according to claim 7, the garment finish feature corresponding to a fabric type of at least part of the 3D garment model, wherein modifying the at least a part of the 3D garment model comprises attributing at least one of a texture and a color to at least part of the 3D garment model based on the garment finish feature.

9. The computer implemented method according to claim 7, the garment finish feature corresponding to seams of the garment, wherein modifying at least a part of the 3D garment model comprises attributing at least one of a thread color, a thread type, and a stitch pattern to seams of the garment.

10. The computer implemented method according to claim 6, wherein virtually finishing the 3D garment model comprises adding at least one garment finish model to the 3D garment model.

11. The computer implemented method according to claim 10, the garment finish feature corresponding to seams of the garment, wherein the at least one garment finish model represents stitches to be placed at dedicated locations within the garment.

12. The computer implemented method according to claim 10, the garment finish feature corresponding to bindings of the garment, wherein the at least one garment finish model represents hems to be placed at openings of the garment.

13. The computer implemented method according to claim 10, the garment finish feature corresponding to a closure of the garment, wherein the at least one garment finish model represents at least one of: a button, a buttonhook, a snap fastener, a zipper, a touch fastener, a magnetic fastener, a hook, a loop for a hook or a button, a cord fastener, and laces.

14. The computer implemented method according to claim 6, wherein for determining the at least one garment finish feature, the extraction algorithm is configured for analyzing the one or more documents with respect to at least one of: textual information, image data, arrows, size data, color swatches, color indicators, stitch types, and stitch designations.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0098] By way of example only, preferred embodiments of the invention will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying figures, wherein:

[0099] FIG. 1 shows an exemplary first document or at least a part of a third document;

[0100] FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of preliminarily orienting and positioning 2D panel models on their dedicated poses within an avatar as a preparation for the virtual garment assembly;

[0101] FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of pre-shaping 2D panel models into 3D panel models as a preparation for the virtual garment assembly;

[0102] FIG. 4 shows an exemplary second document or at least a part of a third document;

[0103] FIG. 5 shows an embodiment of finishing a 3D garment model that has no finishes yet based at least in part on the document as shown in FIG. 4;

[0104] FIGS. 6-10 show an exemplary garment finish preset generation process;

[0105] FIGS. 11-13 show another exemplary garment finish preset generation process;

[0106] FIG. 14 shows an exemplary automatic garment finish preset generation process.

[0107] FIGS. 15-16 show an exemplary garment finish preset retrieval and application process;

[0108] FIGS. 17-18 show another exemplary garment finish preset retrieval and application process; and

[0109] FIGS. 19-20 show yet another exemplary garment finish preset retrieval and application process.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0110] FIGS. 1 to 3 show aspects that are used in the first computer implemented method as presented herein. The purpose of this method is to automatically generate a first 3D garment model such that it represents a first garment that is to be fabricated in reality from first garment panels.

[0111] With the first method it is therefore proposed to provide one or more first documents 1 which comprise a plurality of first 2D pattern pieces 2 that represent those the first garment panels. These documents could be a Computer Aided Design (CAD) file, a Portable Document Format (PDF) file, an image file in any format, or any other file containing computer-readable or human-readable 2D shapes of pattern pieces. In the shown example, the 2D pattern document 1 contains representations of the front and back panels of a T-shirt (3 and 4), the sleeve panels 5 and 6, and a neck binding (or neck tape) 7.

[0112] According to the invention, a garment type indicator for at least one of the first 2D pattern pieces 2 is determined with a pattern recognition algorithm. The garment type indicator represents a type of a garment that the respective first garment panel(s) belong(s) to. In this case, the pattern recognition algorithm detects that this document 1 belongs to a T-shirt because a typically shaped panel and/or a typical collection of typically shaped panels was detected.

[0113] The determined garment type indicator is one of a plurality of garment type indicators stored on the machine readable medium. For example, the garment type indicators can refer to the type of garment on a very basic level, like a T-shirt, pants, underwear, etc., but it can alternatively or additionally also refer to the type of garment on a more detailed level, like long-sleeved shirt or short-sleeved shirt, ladieswear or menswear, dressed or denim, suit pants or 5-pocket, etc.

[0114] Furthermore, a panel pose indicator is determined with the pattern recognition algorithm for each of the first 2D pattern pieces. The panel pose indicator represents an estimated position and an estimated orientation of the respective garment panel within the first garment. For example, the algorithm will identify a panel with the shape of the back piece 4 to be located in the back with the long straight line at the bottom. It will further identify the front piece 3 to be located in the front but turned around such that again the long straight line is at the bottom and the neck part in the top. The first 3D garment model is now generated based on the first 2D pattern pieces, the at least one garment type indicator, and the panel pose indicators.

[0115] FIGS. 2 and 3 show two examples of this positioning and orienting. These two ways of assembly can be complementing or be applied alternatively.

[0116] According to what is shown in FIG. 2, the first method may further comprise the generation of a first 2D panel model 8 for each of the first 2D pattern pieces 2, which are positioned and oriented in accordance with the panel pose indicators, wherein for generating the first 3D garment model 10, a reference object 9 is draped with the first 2D panel models 8. In the shown example, the reference object 9 is an invisible or transparent avatar having an average shape of a human body, in particular in accordance with the garment type indicator (woman/man/child, etc.).

[0117] According to what is shown in FIG. 3, the single components for the first 3D garment model 12 may be represented by first 2D panel models which are then pre-shaped before the final assembly to form first 3D panel models 11. As shown, each sleeve is wrapped around, e.g. to form a tube as shown, and sewed together, and the front and back panel are shaped following a typical chest and back form. In this way, assembling these first 3D panel models 11 to form a first 3D garment model 13 is straightforward because fewer computational effort is necessary to find the lines of connection (seams).

[0118] The first 3D garment model 13 is shown on a transparent avatar 12, but the reference object can also be a garment hanger or any other holder that presents the garment in such a way that a designer can easily work on the garment design in a CAD environment. The reference object can be two- or three-dimensional.

[0119] In summary, the first method may further comprise said positioning and orienting of the first 2D panel models 8 based on the panel pose indicators, in particular further based on based on a proportion of the first 2D pattern pieces 2 relative to each other. If also said proportion is taken into account, then the panels can be positioned and oriented already quite closely to each other (because the general size of the garment can be estimated) such that the rendering of the assembly is made more efficient.

[0120] While, before, or after said positioning and orienting the 2D panel models 8, the first method may include shaping each of the first 2D panel models 8 into first 3D panel models 11 so as they adapt to a shape of the reference object 13 (in the respective area) based on the at least one garment type indicator, and the panel pose indicators. Thus, according to a respective garment type indicator (in this case: a T-shirt), the first method may take into account information (which may be stored on the computer-readable medium) about the typical 3D shape of the respective panel.

[0121] Eventually, the first 3D garment model 13 is generated by virtually assembling the first 3D panel models 11 (which are the shaped first 2D panel models 8) along their respective edges. In particular, the first 2D or 3D panel models are virtually stitched together a default allowance away from the edges, wherein models of default seams can be provided at the virtual stitch lines.

[0122] In general, the first method may provide adding default finishes to the first 3D garment model based on the respective garment type indicator and/or the panel pose indicators. For example, in the awareness that the present garment is a T-shirt, the first 3D garment model 10/13 might be equipped with standard French seams, wherein in case of a jeans the method might equip the first 3D garment model with a standard lapped seam.

[0123] In an embodiment of the first computer implemented method, for determining a garment type indicator and the panel pose indicator, the pattern recognition algorithm is configured for analyzing at least one of (a) a shape of the 2D pattern piece, (b) a proportion of the 2D pattern piece relative to the other 2D pattern pieces, (c) textual information associated with the 2D pattern piece in the respective first document, (d) whether the 2D pattern piece is at least in part symmetrical or not, and (e) an amount of provided 2D pattern pieces.

[0124] A particular advantage of said first method is that the first 3D garment model is fully automatically generated without the need of manual intervention, based on merely the at least one first document with its depiction or description of the first 2D pattern pieces that represent the first garment panels from which the first garment is to be fabricated.

[0125] The first method, in particular the pattern recognition algorithm, may be trainable based on machine learning using training data from previous first 3D garment model generations. Specifically, such a machine learning algorithm can “learn” from user input that is aimed at correcting the automatic choices made by the computer.

[0126] FIGS. 4 and 5 show aspects that are used in the second computer implemented method as presented herein. The purpose of this method is to virtually finish a second 3D garment model which represents a second garment to be fabricated in reality and which does not yet have finishes or merely has default finishes.

[0127] With the second method it is therefore proposed to provide said second 3D garment model that has no or only default finishes and to further provide one or more second documents which comprise human-readable garment finishing instructions for finishing the second garment. One exemplary such document 14, often referred to as “Tech Pack” among experts, is shown in FIG. 4. These one or more second documents describe how a certain garment is to be finished. As such, the document may refer to several garment finish features, such as the type of fabric to be used, the color to be chosen for a specific component, the stitch type and a hem type to fabricate at an opening, the addition of certain elements, as well as further parameters and description that instruct a sewer to finish the garment. The instructions in such documents address humans and not machines. In the shown example of FIG. 4, the single garment finish features are pointed at with arrows and described with text, parameters, references to 2D patterns, and/or samples.

[0128] The second method provides an extraction algorithm that is configured to determine at least one such garment finish feature from the one or more second documents. Said garment finish feature corresponds to an additional garment component and/or a garment property, and is indicative for a position and an orientation of the respective additional garment component or garment property within the second garment. Therefore, the extraction algorithm specifically extracts all the information necessary to finish the garment as is provisioned in the second document(s). In particular, the extraction algorithm is configured to interpret the human-readable instructions and illustrations to establish the garment finish features.

[0129] The second 3D garment model is then virtually finished based on the determined at least one garment finish feature. Specifically, the second method may retrieve stored elements (e.g. 3D models of zippers or 2D models of seams) and/or model appearances (texture, color, etc.) in order to modify the second 3D garment model 21 (see FIG. 5) to form a finished second 3D garment model 22. In particular, the second method provides interpretations of garment finish features based on training data as to how and where the second 3D garment model 21 is to be modified in order to arrive at the finished second 3D garment model 22. Thus, when the garment finish feature corresponds to a fabric type 17 of at least part of the second 3D garment model, the at least part of the second 3D garment model is modified by attributing at least one of a texture and a color to at least part of the second 3D garment model based on the garment finish feature.

[0130] If the garment finish feature corresponds to seams of the second garment (see for example reference 18), the at least part of the second 3D garment model is modified by attributing at least one of a thread color, a thread type, and a stitch pattern to seams of the second garment.

[0131] Virtually finishing the second 3D garment model 21 may as mentioned also comprise adding at least one garment finish model to the second 3D garment model. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, the V-neckline is hemmed with an added neck tape (see reference 7 in FIG. 1) referred to in the text 15 pointing at the neckline. In other embodiments, the neckline may be a boundary for further shaping the upper edge of the garment with a collar, cowl, darts, or pleats.

[0132] If the garment finish feature corresponds to seams of the second garment, the at least one garment finish model may represent stitches to be placed at dedicated locations within the second garment, see reference 15, 16, and 18 in FIG. 4. If the garment finish feature corresponds to bindings of the second garment (see reference 18), the at least one garment finish model may represent a hem to be placed at the lower opening of the second garment. Therefore, in the given example of FIG. 5, the bottom edge of the second 3D garment model 21 is turned down (or just shortened for the sake of visualization) and virtually stitched.

[0133] In an embodiment of the second computer implemented method, the garment finish feature may also correspond to a closure of the garment (not the case in the shown example), wherein the at least one garment finish model represents at least one of a button, a buttonhook, a snap fastener, a zipper, a touch fastener, a magnetic fastener, a hook, a loop for a hook or a button, a cord fastener, and laces.

[0134] Specifically, for determining the at least one garment finish feature, the extraction algorithm may be configured for analyzing the one or more second document 14 with respect to at least one of: textual information 15-19, image data, arrows, size data 20, color swatches 17, color indicators, stitch types, and stitch designations. The algorithm may be trained to search the second document(s) 14 for keywords, known patterns in describing a garment finish feature, arrows (especially the alignment of arrows), numeric values (especially typical number ranges), and so on.

[0135] Specifically, the second 3D garment model 21 may be an assembly of a plurality of second 3D pattern pieces representing second garment panels that the second garment is to be fabricated from, i.e. just as it is established as first 3D garment model by the first method described above. This first 3D garment model lacks finishes or is equipped with default finishes because it is based on the first 2D pattern pieces comprised by the first document which is usually silent about how the panels are to be assembled.

[0136] In a special embodiment, the third method as presented herein is a combination of the first and second method. However, more generally speaking, the purpose of the third method is to automatically generate a plurality of third 3D garment models in a batch process, each third 3D garment model representing a third garment to be fabricated from third garment panels. According to the third method, for each third 3D garment model to be generated, one or more third documents are provided. Said third document(s) comprise(s) a plurality of third 2D pattern pieces representing the third garment panels and human-readable garment finishing instructions for finishing the third garment. Hence, just as for the assembly process in reality, the garment patterns and corresponding instructions (“Tech Pack”) are provided.

[0137] The patterns of the third 2D pattern pieces are then automatically recognized, based on which a fourth 3D garment model is generated. From the human-readable garment finishing instructions, at least one garment finish feature is extracted, based on which third 3D garment model is generated by virtually finishing each of the fourth 3D garment models. Even if the nomenclature suggests otherwise, the fourth 3D garment model is a “work-in-progress” and is predecessor to the third 3D garment model.

[0138] After a plurality of third 3D garment models have been batch-processed, a report is generated which is indicative for at least one of: (i) could all third documents be translated into fourth 3D garment models? (ii) specifically which of the fourth 3D garment models could be generated? (iii) with what level of confidence (likelihood of correctness) was each of the fourth 3D garment models generated? (iv) specifically which of the fourth 3D garment models could not be generated? (v) which of the fourth 3D garment models could be generated only in part and to what extent (e.g. what part is missing)? (vi) could a third 3D garment model be generated from each of the fourth 3D garment models? (vii) which of the third 3D garment models could be generated? (viii) with what level of confidence (likelihood of correctness) was each of the third 3D garment models generated? (ix) which of the third 3D garment models could not be generated? and (x) which of the third 3D garment model could be generated only in part and to what extent (what part or feature is missing)?

[0139] The report may be used by a user to quickly find out about the unsuccessful or partly successful conversions in order to manually correct the respective models or give feedback to the computer (e.g. by confirming or rejecting the respective part of the report). The report and/or the manual corrections/user feedback may be used to further improve or train the pattern recognition, the extraction, and/or the virtual panel assembly.

[0140] Specifically, recognizing the patterns of the third 2D pattern pieces may be based on determining, with a pattern recognition algorithm, a garment type indicator for at least one of the third 2D pattern pieces and a panel pose indicator for each of the third 2D pattern pieces. Generating the fourth 3D garment model is further based on the garment type indicator and the panel pose indicator.

[0141] Said garment type indicator represents, or in other words: is indicative for, a type of a garment that the respective third garment panel belongs to. The garment type indicator may be selected from a plurality of garment type indicators stored on the machine readable medium. Said panel pose indicator representing, or in other words: is indicative for, an estimated or preliminary position and an estimated or preliminary orientation of the respective garment panel within the third garment.

[0142] Furthermore, the extraction of the at least one garment finish feature may be based on determining, with an extraction algorithm, the at least one garment finish feature from the one or more third documents, in particular from the human-readable garment finishing instructions for finishing the third garment. The garment finish feature corresponds to an additional garment component or a garment property and represents, or in other words: is indicative for, a position and an orientation of (a) the respective additional garment component or (b) the respective garment property within the third garment.

[0143] For determining the at least one garment finish feature, the extraction algorithm may be configured for analyzing the one or more third documents, in particular the human-readable garment finishing instructions for finishing the third garment, with respect to at least one of: textual information, image data, arrows, size data, color swatches, color indicators, stitch types, and stitch designations.

[0144] The one or more third documents that correspond to a single garment (for which the third 3D garment model is to be generated) may in particular be so-called “Tech Packs” with corresponding 2D patterns and assembly instructions. This could all be combined in one file or document, however, it may also be provided as two or more correlated files or documents.

[0145] It is noted that the text in FIG. 4 is dummy text (lorem ipsum) the only purpose of which is to indicate that in such a document there may be several text passages for assembly guidance and similar comments addressed to the human user, i.e. non machine-readable. FIG. 4 shows an example for at least a part of a second document and for at least a part of a third document.

[0146] FIGS. 6-10 show an exemplary garment finish preset generation process. By clicking a button 23 with a mouse cursor, the process of generating a new finish preset is initiated. The design steps or assembly steps following the initiation are then tracked and sampled. FIG. 7 then shows a first exemplary design step, wherein a garment panel edge 24 is folded by 180° which is initiated by clicking a design tool button 25 with the mouse cursor (1). Then (2), the amount of distance by which the edge 24 is folded can be determined by the mouse cursor drag-and-dropping the edge 24 at the desired location, which results in the hem edge 26. In a further step, as shown in FIG. 8, the stitch type can be chosen with the drop-down button 27. A variety of different stitch types is shown with dropped-down buttons, among which the user selects (1) the zig-zag pattern as per button 28. The user then (2) defines the location on the garment model where the zig-zag stitch should run, i.e. with what distance to the hem edge 26. With an exemplary button 29 (see FIG. 9), the user can end the sampling and finalize the finish preset. A prompt window 30 then shows up to save the preset under a desired name. The data or file containing the garment finish preset describes everything that is needed to assemble the finish, i.e. it comprises information about what finish parts are used (in the shown case: the thread to stitch the seam) and about what assembly steps are involved in manufacturing the finish from the finish parts (in the shown case: folding, length of overlap). This may comprise that each part involved is stored with different states for each assembly step, i.e. for example, in a first step a garment panel is unfolded, in a next step the same part is folded at a defined place, etc. They are the same piece but have different positions, orientations, and shapes depending on the commands the user has created to act upon them.

[0147] FIGS. 11-13 show another exemplary garment finish preset generation process, wherein a user assembles a customized collar made of several different finish parts. With the drop-down menu bar 31, category “Collars” is selected to display underneath it all available design tools related to collars. Different collar shapes can be selected with the button 32. Further options may be but are not limited to the neck band size or shape or style, stitch type, button hole type, button style, cloth type or color.

[0148] FIG. 12 shows how the finish parts can be parametrically altered. For example, as shown, the user can click on the collar edge 33 and drag it to a different position to reshape the collar. The other side of the collar is altered in the same manner either simultaneously or afterwards in order to maintain symmetry. When the collar is complete, i.e. all belonging parts are selected and assembled, and all components have the desired style or shape, the user can trigger a “save as . . . ” window 34 to store the preset under a desired name. What this saved file will contain is a computer-interpretable data collection of what finish parts are comprised by the garment finish preset and what assembly steps are involved in manufacturing the finish from the finish parts. The preset can be retrieved in a virtual 3D environment and can be applied, either manually or automatically, to a garment model which is also loaded into the virtual 3D environment.

[0149] FIG. 14 shows an exemplary automatic garment finish preset generation process based on documents as they are explained above in context of FIG. 4. Such documents, which are often referred to as “Tech Packs”, usually comprise information on how a certain garment is to be finished and that information is exclusively meant for humans to read and understand (not for computers). Specifically, these documents usually comprise drawings, images, arrows, size data, color swatches, color indicators, stitch types, stitch designations (location), textual and/or numerical information that serve as instructions about how to manufacture the finish. As such, “Tech Packs” are often highly individual also with regards to the ways they express the contained information. An extraction algorithm automatically determines garment finish features based on the documents. More specifically, the extraction algorithm is trained, based on feedback and/or experience, to interpret drawings or images with respect to 2D/3D depiction. For example, the extraction algorithm can distinguish between 2D depictions and 3D depictions and extract the correct dimensions and/or proportions based on this recognition.

[0150] Referring to FIG. 14, the document 35 contains a drawing of a cuff next to a lookup table that refers to the respective dimensions of the cuff regions. The extraction algorithm 36 executed on a computer 37 is trained to analyze the drawing and the values in the table and translates the information into a garment finish preset, that can be saved, for example, after confirmation via the pop-up window 38. Optionally, the newly created preset can be linked to category and the window 38 may comprise a suggestion which can be overruled by the user in the box 39.

[0151] The newly created garment finish preset 40 can also be automatically displayed to support the user in deciding what finish it is and if every information available in the document was (correctly) interpreted by the extraction algorithm. To check every aspect of it (e.g. the buttons on the backside), the model 40 of the finish may be configured to be three-dimensionally rotatable in the virtual 3D environment. It is possible that, such as in the shown case, one single document contains more than one finish instruction (see the chest pocket next to the cuff). The extraction algorithm is particularly configured to distinguish between a plurality of different finishes and associate the available data correctly.

[0152] The extraction algorithm specifically extracts finish features from the drawing based on which the single finish parts of the finish are identified and used to virtually assemble the whole finish. The extraction algorithm may further be configured to identify, or interpret the garment finish features to determine a position and an orientation of the finish that it usually occupies within a garment.

[0153] In particular, when a preset is recorded for example like it was explained with FIGS. 6-10 or with FIGS. 11-13 or with FIG. 14, the respectively proposed computer implemented method may automatically associate counter-parameters or tags to the finish. For example, the hem preset as seen in FIG. 8 would be equipped with tags representing the presence of a boundary or sleeve or opening of a garment, as it would be applicable to such places. The collar as created in FIG. 12 would automatically be attributed with an indicator that this preset is applicable to an neck opening, and also generally, that it is suitable for shirts (garment type indicator). These kind of tags make it possible to identify a suitability and possibly also a degree of suitability (likelihood) when the designer or the software searches for applicable finishes. Even more specifically, when turning to the example of the cuff in FIG. 14, the edges of the cuff could also be assigned with counter-parameters or links or tags or attributes indicating where exactly it needs to be assembled with the sleeve of a shirt. However, these counter-parameters may also be added or defined manually by the user of the software. The above mentioned counter-parameters are labeled “counter” because they correspond to parameters comprised by the main garment. So, in a way, these parameters can be understood as tie points (panel boundary parameters) but potentially also as features that help to identify them.

[0154] FIGS. 15-16 show an exemplary garment finish preset retrieval and application process. Let us suppose that the finish preset generated with the process described with FIGS. 6-10 was saved under the name of “NewSt.ZigZag_single” and that the user can now retrieve this preset in the window 41 by first selecting a category of the desired element in the field 42 and then pick it among all the presets saved under this category. Next to the finish preset selection window, the GUI can provide a preview 44 of the finish. The next step is shown in FIG. 16: A garment 45 loaded into the virtual 3D environment can now be “equipped” with the selected finish, wherein the user needs to define the location within the garment model 45 where the finish shall be applied. He does this by selecting the bottom opening 46 of the shirt 45.

[0155] FIGS. 17-18 show another exemplary garment finish preset retrieval and application process. First, the category “Collars” is selected which causes the finish preset drop-down menu 47 to load all available collar presets. Let us once again suppose that the finish preset generated with the process described with FIGS. 11-13 was saved under the name of “SumCollect. Casual 3.5” and that the user can retrieve this preset in the menu 47. A preview 48 may be loaded and displayed when hovering over the single presets. When clicked on, the selected collar is loaded into the virtual 3D environment where also the garment 45 has been designed before. The collar could be automatically inserted at the correct place, or, as in the shown case, it may be dragged by the user to the desired location, where it is, automatically or upon demand, assembled with the shirt 45.

[0156] Finally, FIGS. 19-20 show yet another exemplary garment finish preset retrieval and application process. This time, the cuff that was automatically generated from the tech pack (see FIG. 14 and corresponding description) is loaded into the virtual 3D environment, which again serves as GUI in that the cuff can be displaced by the cursor to be linked to the sleeve of the shirt.

[0157] Generally, according to at least some aspects of the present invention, a garment finish presets (generated in whatever way) can be suggested to a designer, i.e. a user of the virtual 3D environment of a garment design software, based on its suitability with a 3D garment model already at hand, or a 2D pattern set representing the panels that the respective garment is to be fabricated from.

[0158] The garment finish preset may be understood as a set of macros that can be applied across garments. In order to find out if one of a plurality of garment finish presets stored in a library is suitable for a present garment, the features of said garment shall be identified. That may include, but is not limited to, pieces types and segments types, e.g. based on detected outside boundaries.

[0159] In particular, the garment (which is either at hand already in 3D shape or to be assembled based on 2D pattern pieces) comprises parameters or “tags”, that for example represent the existence of at least one of openings, other links, dimensions, locations of a specific feature, names, typical features that may be added at a specific location, garment category, etc.

[0160] Specifically, an indicator for the type of garment and an indicator for the type of the panels that the garment is comprised of are identified and based on the identified indicators, a list of suggested, likely suitable presets (candidates) is generated. For example, identifying a T-shirt and that the T-shirt has a short-arm sleeve, the software would present as a candidate garment finish preset a seam pattern for the shoulder area and for the hem of the sleeve. The identification algorithm would further identify the neck opening and thus trigger the suggestion of a neck binding, and so on.

[0161] It is highly likely that more than just one “candidate” for a suitable garment finish preset is found, which is why the computer implemented method may further provide a list of priorities, or a “ranking” so to speak, that provides a plurality of garment finish presets sorted after the likelihood of suitability, which may be derived by analyzing how many requirements are fulfilled in view of the garment at hand.

[0162] But the garment finish features contained by the suggestion list do not necessarily compete. For example, if the garment is identified as a shirt, it is determined that e.g. pockets, collars, cuff, neck binding, and slits are indeed suitable to be added to the garment. These finishes (pocket, collar, cuff, neck binding, slits) are detected based on said tags or parameters, i.e. each of the corresponding garment finish presets has a group of counter-parameters, and each group of these counter-parameters has an overlap with the group of parameters of the shirt model (or shirt pattern pieces). For each identified suitable garment finish preset (pocket, collar, cuff, neck binding, slits), one or more differently styled preset may be suggested. For that, even an analysis of style, shape, color, or cloth type me be undertaken to generate a list of priorities.

[0163] In any case, upon selecting a garment finish preset to be added or applied to a garment loaded into the virtual 3D environment, in accordance with embodiments, the parts contained by the preset are automatically resized (in particular also reshaped) to fit the places where they are added to the garment (e.g. the opening in case of a collar or cuff).

[0164] In case only a set of 2D pattern pieces is loaded (either only in the background, or indeed loaded into the virtual 3D environment), a garment finish preset may also refer to a more basic set of assembly instructions, e.g. a specific way how to sew the pieces of a T-shirt together. All information necessary to do so (type of sewing thread, color, type of seam, type of hems, etc.) are stored in the preset and automatically applied in the correct order to the T-shirt panels.

[0165] In particular embodiments, the garment finish features stored in the library can be understood as “user defined finishes” comprised of a reusable list of commands (like a macro) that allow the user to assemble a portion of the garment using a series of commands. The commands are things like: “fold a piece”, “place a piece relative to another piece in this way”, “sew two segments together”, “create a piece of a certain size”, “add a slit to a piece”, “invert a piece”, etc. These commands or instructions can be executed to assemble or adjust a finish on the garment model. The garment finish presets mirror the steps to some degree of the actual assembly of the garment component and can be applied to all garments that are identified to be suitable. For this identification, each piece and each segment (a continuous portion of the boundary), each drill point, notch point, and internal line may be given unique identifiers (parameters) that work across all similar garments. The orientation that a piece is to adapt should be consistent (for example a pocket bag), i.e. if e.g. a piece is folded according to a preset, the fold instruction has to assume the piece being oriented consistently so the fold will work the same way on all similar garments or pieces.

[0166] In other words, with the present invention, a new “language” is proposed that make predefined finishes “comprehensible” and applicable to a plurality of other same or similar type garments.

[0167] Although the invention is illustrated above, partly with reference to some preferred embodiments, it must be understood that numerous modifications and combinations of different features of the embodiments can be made. All of these modifications lie within the scope of the appended claims.