MONITORING A STRUCTURE FOR DAMAGE

Abstract

A structure to be monitored for damage and a method of monitoring the structure for damage are provided. The structure has a coating thereon, the coating defining a surface having characteristics which vary in a predetermined manner with damage to the structure. The surface has a series of conductive tracks applied thereto and in intimate contact therewith such that the said predetermined variation of the surface characteristics will vary the resistance of the series of conductive tracks in a predetermined manner in order to determine both location and extent of damage.

Claims

1: A structure to be monitored for damage, the structure having a coating thereon, the coating defining a surface having specific failure characteristics tailored to the structure which vary in a predetermined manner with damage to the structure, the surface having a series of conductive tracks applied thereto and in intimate contact therewith such that the said predetermined variation of the surface characteristics will vary the resistance of the series of conductive tracks in a predetermined manner.

2: The structure according to claim 1, in which the variation in surface characteristics comprises cracking of the surface to an extent dependent upon the degree and/or type of damage to the structure.

3: The structure according to claim 1, in which the coating is a glassy polymer.

4: The structure according to claim 1, in which the coating is a thermoset polymer.

5: The structure according to claim 1, in which the coating is a mixture of polymers and fillers.

6: The structure according to claim 1, in which the coating is a cementitious ceramic.

7: The structure according to claim 1, in which the characteristics of the surface of the coating vary with damage to the structure which includes impact damage, damage due to compressive or tensile loading above a certain threshold or damage due to repeated loading below the said threshold.

8: The structure according to claim 1, in which a said conductive track is formed on the surface of the coating by a direct write process.

9: The structure according to claim 1, comprising a protective helmet in which the coating is applied to an interior surface of the helmet.

10: The structure according to claim 1, comprising an aircraft structural component.

11: The structure according to claim 1, in which the coating includes crack initiation means.

12: The structure according to claim 11, in which the crack initiation means comprises particulates in the coating.

13: The structure according to claim 11, in which the crack initiation means comprises voids in the coating.

14: The structure according to claim 11, in which the crack initiation means comprises micro-cracking in the coating.

15: The structure according to claim 1, in which the coating is calibrated whereby to display the said variation in characteristics in response to a defined state of damage.

16: The structure according to claim 1, in which the series of conductive tracks comprises a grid array disposed across the structure.

17: The structure according to claim 16, including a series of electrical connections positioned around a periphery of the grid array and monitoring means connected via said connections to the grid array, the monitoring means being adapted to interrogate the grid array whereby to determine a location on the structure of any said damage.

18: The structure according to claim 17, in which the monitoring means is arranged to interrogate the grid array during use of the structure.

19: A method of testing a structure for damage, the method including the steps of providing the structure with a coating defining a surface and having a series of conductive tracks applied to the surface in intimate contact therewith, the surface having specific failure characteristics tailored to the structure which vary in a predetermined manner with damage to the structure and the resistance of the series of conductive tracks being made variable in known relationship with the variation in surface characteristics of the surface, including measuring an electrical parameter of the series of tracks and comparing the measured parameter with the same parameter of the tracks when measured for the undamaged structure.

20-22. (canceled)

23: The method according to claim 19 in which the parameter measured is resistance.

24: The method according to claim 19, in which the series of conductive tracks comprises a grid array having a series of electrical connections positioned around a periphery of the grid array and the method includes the step of operating monitoring means connected via said connections to the grid array to interrogate different combinations of connections whereby to determine a said electrical parameter for each combination followed by analysis of said parameters to determine a location on the structure of any said damage.

25: The method according to claim 24, in which determination of the location on the structure of any damage by analysis of the parameters includes making reference to results of previous calibration data for the structure.

Description

[0027] The invention may be performed in various ways, and, by way of example, an embodiment thereof will now be described, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:—

[0028] FIG. 1 shows, schematically, the interior of a protective helmet with conducting tracks printed onto an interior surface thereof;

[0029] FIG. 2 shows a sample of printed tracks in the form of a grid, and

[0030] FIG. 3 shows a further sample grid using a ladder type structure.

[0031] Referring to the drawings, FIG. 1 shows a protective helmet 1 having an interior surface 2. The helmet 1 includes a protective shell 7 having front padding 8, rear padding 9 and internal padding and chin strap (removed and not shown, for clarity). The interior surface 2 is defined on an interior coating 3 for the helmet. The coating 3 is a glassy polymer which has been formulated to crack in response to impacts of a certain predefined type and amplitude occurring to the helmet 1. To calibrate the coating 3 in this way, coatings of various formulations were applied to the interior of the helmet. For each formulation of coating 3, the helmet was subject to impacts typically expected to occur to that type of helmet. Thus, for a military helmet, the helmet may be subject to various accidental knocks, both when worn and when not being worn. The helmet could also be dropped onto a hard surface. In battle, the helmet may be subject to various types of glancing blow, perhaps from a rifle butt or some other hard object. The helmet may even be struck a glancing blow from a projectile, such as a bullet or shrapnel. Impacts designed to replicate such impacts were applied to the helmet and the visual effects on the coating noted.

[0032] In addition to a close inspection of the coating itself, a grid pattern 4 of conductive ink tracks 5 was printed onto the interior surface 2 of the coating 3, using direct write technology. Shown are eighteen ladder patterns 11 of the grid 4. The number of ladder patterns 11 may be increased or decreased according to the degree of damage resolution required. Terminals 6 are connectable to monitoring means 10 (see FIG. 3) capable of systematically applying test voltages to different pairs of terminals. Here, the monitoring means are directly connectable to the terminals 6. However, in practice, the terminals 6 may be connected to a transmitter 13 to transmit the state of the grid to remote monitoring means 12 which may be in the form of a hand-held terminal. Such an arrangement may be used for real time monitoring of the state of the helmet or structure.

[0033] Different types of impact to the helmet will cause differing extents and types of cracking in the coating 3. Each crack will cause a full or partial discontinuity in a printed track, thus affecting the overall conductivity of that track.

[0034] The monitoring means includes a computer to analyse the results of the applied voltages. The analysis of the results can be used to locate track discontinuities and therefore damage to the helmet 1. In fact, with a sufficiently sensitive grid 4 and monitoring means, it is possible to determine the shape and size of helmet damage.

[0035] The computer may be used to store results of helmet impacts, both test impacts and in-service impacts. The store can be interrogated whenever convenient, in order to determine the structural state of the helmet. Thus, for example, a helmet may be tested regularly for damage, according to the invention. A particular advantage of the invention is its ability to determine whether a particular impact, which may have seemed or been relatively light in nature, has inflicted unacceptable damage to a helmet or not. Fibre reinforced composite materials are notorious for suffering impact damage which can be serious but which is not easily seen at the surface. Ongoing monitoring of the structure/helmet may be used to monitor damage which has already occurred, to determine whether the damage has increased or stayed static, over time.

[0036] FIG. 2 shows a sample directly written grid of the same type as could be used according to the invention. The grid pattern 4 of conducting tracks 5 extends over an area to be monitored. Interrogation of terminals 6 by monitoring means 10 can provide data for analysis in the same manner as for the grid of FIG. 1.

[0037] FIG. 3 shows a simplified ladder type grid arrangement having a series of four ladders 11. This arrangement affords location of damage in longitudinal and lateral directions.