SYSTEM AND METHODS OF FIELD OF VIEW ALIGNMENT
20170365144 · 2017-12-21
Inventors
Cpc classification
G08B13/1963
PHYSICS
G08B13/19652
PHYSICS
G08B13/19632
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
The invention relates to a security system comprising: a first monitoring subsystem, said first monitoring subsystem being arranged to detect events within a first field of view using a first detection mechanism; a second monitoring subsystem, said monitoring subsystem being arranged to detect events within a second field of view using a second detection mechanism; a mounting arrangement configured to carry the first and second monitoring subsystems and mount them to a substrate; wherein in use, an alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem is configured to be orientated with respect to the mounting arrangement so that the first field of view covers an area to be monitored; and wherein the orientation of the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem determines the orientation of the second field of view of the second monitoring subsystem.
Claims
1. A system comprising: a first monitoring subsystem, said first monitoring subsystem being arranged to detect events within a first field of view using a first detection mechanism; a second monitoring subsystem, said monitoring subsystem being arranged to detect events within a second field of view using a second detection mechanism; and a mounting arrangement configured to carry the first and second monitoring subsystems and mount them to a substrate; wherein in use, an alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem is configured to be orientated with respect to the mounting arrangement so that the first field of view covers an area to be monitored; and wherein the orientation of the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem determines the orientation of the second field of view of the second monitoring subsystem.
2. (canceled)
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the alignable component is a detector head including electro-optical detector circuitry.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the alignable component is any one or more of the following: a camera, a PIR sensor having a field of view; an optical component or system including any one or more of a lens, mirror, and prism, wherein the position and/or orientation relative to the mounting support defines a field of view or field of illumination of the alignable component of the detector.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem is rotatably mounted with respect to the mounting arrangement.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the orientation of the second field of view is determined so that it overlaps the first field of view, to thereby enable common events to be detected by the first and second subsystems using their respective detection mechanisms.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the orientation of the second field of view is determined by physically orientating an alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem with respect to the mounting arrangement; and wherein an axis of rotation of the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem is parallel or co-axial with an axis of rotation of the alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem.
8. (canceled)
9. The system of claim 7, wherein the alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem is rotatably mounted with respect to the mounting arrangement.
10. The system of claim 7, wherein the alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem is mechanically coupled to the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the orientation of the second field of view may be determined by assigning a reference orientation for a coordinate system used by the second monitoring subsystem.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the system further includes a sensing system to determine the relative orientation of the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem, and the alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem.
13. (canceled)
14. The system of claim 12 wherein the sensing system includes at least one directional sensor (e.g. electronic compass or inclinometer) associated with at least one of the first or second monitoring subsystems to determine an orientation of the alignable component.
15. The system of claim 1, wherein the mounting arrangement includes a mounting bracket, and the alignable component of the first and/or second monitoring subsystem is mounted to the mounting bracket.
16. (canceled)
17. The system of claim 15 wherein the alignable components of the first and second monitoring systems are mounted to opposite sides of the mounting bracket.
18. The system of claim 1 wherein the first monitoring subsystem is a PIR detector and the second monitoring subsystem is a camera.
19. A method comprising: orientating, with respect to a mounting arrangement, an alignable component of a first monitoring subsystem, said first monitoring subsystem being arranged to detect events within a first field of view using a first detection mechanism; wherein the orientation of the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem determines the orientation of the second field of view of a second monitoring subsystem carried by the mounting arrangement, said second monitoring subsystem, being arranged to detect events within a second field of view using a second detection mechanism.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein orientating the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem includes rotating the alignable component with respect to the mounting arrangement.
21. The method of claim 19, wherein the method further includes physically orientating an alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem with respect to the mounting arrangement.
22. The method of claim 19, wherein the orientation of the second field of view is determined by: assigning a reference orientation for a coordinate system used by the second monitoring subsystem.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the method further includes sensing the relative orientation of the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem and the alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the method includes assigning a reference orientation of the second monitoring subsystem on the basis of the relative orientation.
25. A method in a security system including: a first monitoring subsystem, said first monitoring subsystem being arranged to detect events within a plurality of zones within a first field of view using a first detection mechanism; and a second monitoring subsystem, said second monitoring subsystem being arranged to detect events within a second field of view using a second detection mechanism, the field of view of the second monitoring subsystem being re-orientatable and/or relatively resized with respect to the first field of view; the method comprising; detecting an event by the first monitoring subsystem in one of the plurality of zones within the first field of view; and controlling either or both of the orientation or size of the second field of view to coincide with a subset of the zones within the first field of view, but not the whole first field of view to enable verification of the event using the second monitoring subsystem.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the step of controlling either or both of the orientation or size of the second field of view preferably includes re-orientating the second field of view about a single axis.
27. The method of claim 25 further including re-orientating and resizing the second field of view to substantially coincides with the zone, or all zones, within the first field of view in which the event was detected.
28. The method of claim 25, wherein the first and second monitoring subsystems have corresponding alignable components which define their respective first and second fields of view, and said first and second sensor systems are mounted to a common mounting arrangement.
29. (canceled)
30. The method of claim claim 25, wherein the first and second monitoring subsystems have corresponding alignable components which define their respective first and second fields of view, and said alignable components are mounted to different mounting arrangements.
31. The method of claim 25, wherein the first monitoring subsystem is a PIR detector and the second monitoring subsystem is a camera.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0036] Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of non-limiting example only with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0045] In one form there is provided a system, e.g. a perimeter surveillance system, having a first monitoring subsystem, such as a PIR detection system, and a second monitoring subsystem being a video motion detection (VMD) system including a camera.
[0046] The PIR detection system has a PIR sensor that is arranged to detect events within a first field of view, and the camera of the VMD system is arranged to detect events within a second field of view. The PIR detector and camera are mounted to a substrate (e.g. a pole, wall, ground, other structure) via a mounting arrangement. Preferably the PIR detector and camera share a mounting bracket, but this is not essential so long as they are in a known physical relationship to each other.
[0047] In use, e.g. during commissioning or maintenance, the alignable components thereof, that dictate the orientation of their respective fields of view, will need to be aligned to monitor a desired area.
[0048] However, use of a mounting arrangement which carries theses parts of the monitoring subsystems in a fixed orientation with respect to the substrate on which it is mounted is not suitable, because in use the position or orientation of the substrate is may not enable the correct or accurate orientation of the fields of view. Therefore, the alignable component of one of the subsystems is carried by the mounting arrangement in a manner that enables its orientation with respect to the substrate to be changed.
[0049] Advantageously, the orientation of the alignable component of the first subsystem determines the orientation of the field of view of the other subsystem—e.g. the orientation of the PIR detector determines the orientation of the camera or vice versa.
[0050] This can be achieved in a range of ways, for example:
[0051] The alignable components of the two subsystems may be mechanically linked, so movement of one causes movement of the other;
[0052] The orientation of the alignable components of the first subsystem (either in an absolute sense (e.g. using a compass), or relative to the substrate; mounting arrangement; or part of the second monitoring subsystem, can be measured and communicated to the second monitoring subsystem to cause re-orientation of its field of view (e.g. using a drive to re-orientate its alignable component) or to set an orientation parameter, such as a reference position used by the second monitoring subsystem.
[0053]
[0054] As can be seen from the plan view illustration at the bottom of
[0055]
[0056] In use, the first monitoring subsystem and second monitoring subsystem can be used together e.g. in a double knock arrangement to monitor a common area. In order to this, the fields of view 102 and 204 of the first and second monitoring subsystems need to overlap such that an event detected in the first field of view 102 of the first monitoring subsystem 100 can also be detected in the second field of view 204 of the second monitoring subsystem 200.
[0057] General mechanisms for performing double knock and other cooperative alarming will not be described here in detail as these will be known to those skilled in the art.
[0058] As a preliminary step in the use of such a system, the system must be commissioned. That is, it must be installed and aligned such that the fields of view of the two monitoring subsystems coincide with the protected area which is being monitored. As mentioned above, physical limitations of the substrate to which the monitoring subsystems will be mounted may lead to a need for onsite alignment of the orientable components of the monitoring subsystem such that they align their field of view in an appropriate way with the area to be protected. Such an arrangement is shown in plan view in
[0059]
[0060]
[0061] Turning firstly to an example of a mechanical coupling between the two alignable components, an example of which is shown in
[0062] The alignable component 502 is alignable about two axes of rotation with respect to the mounting arrangement 506 and hence the substrate 508. The first axis of rotation 510 is a tilt axis enabling re-positioning of the field of view to extend or shorten the range of detection. The alignable component 502 is also pivotable about a vertical axis 512 to allow panning motion of it with respect to the mount 506. During commissioning, these two degrees of freedom will be adjusted by a technician such that the field of view of the first monitoring subsystem coincides with the area to be protected. Once correct alignment has been achieved the position of the alignable component 502 will be locked with respect to the mounting arrangement 506 (eg using a grub screw—not shown) such that correct alignment is maintained. As will be appreciated, from time to time realignment may be necessary as the mounting arrangement or substrate more with respect to each other or their surrounds.
[0063] The second alignable component 504 which forms part of the second monitoring subsystem is also alignable with respect to the mounting arrangement 506. However, in this example two forms of alignment are possible. A first primary alignment, used during commisisioning, is a rotational alignment (e.g. about an axis 512) which is generally parallel or coaxial with the pan axis of the first alignable component 502. Rotation of the second alignable component 504 about the axis 512 is used to establish or set “home position” which is a datum point for the operation of the second monitoring subsystem. The second form alignment which is able to be performed by the alignable component 504 in this example is tilting and panning of its sensor (camera) about horizontal and vertical axis respectively. This motion occurs within the alignable component and is indicated by arrows 514 and 516 respectively. In this example the second monitoring subsystem is a pan, tilt, zoom camera, accordingly the camera 518 has a zoom functionality to enable the focal length of the camera 518 to be adjusted. In use, the pan tilt zoom functionality of the second monitoring subsystem is used to allow relatively rapid movement of the field of view of the second monitoring subsystem, whereas the first type of alignment mentioned above is used to set a defined orientation of the alignable component in commissioning.
[0064] In this example, a mechanical linkage 520, that extends through a void or aperture in the mounting arrangement (not shown), is provided between the first alignable component 502 and the second alignable component 504 such that a realignment of the first alignable component 502 determines the alignment of the alignable component 504, in this example the determination takes the form of physically realigning the alignable component 504 about the axis 512.
[0065] By providing this linkage it is possible for an installer to align the first alignable component, which forms part of the first monitoring subsystem and this causes the corresponding alignment in the alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem. Once this alignment is locked in place, movement of the field of view of the second monitoring subsystem can still take place via operation of its pan tilt zoom mechanism but its home position and primary alignment direction is fixed.
[0066] As will be appreciated from this embodiment, because the second monitoring subsystem includes a pan tilt zoom camera physical reorientation of the second alignable component 504 about the pan axis may not be necessary, but instead a notational determination of alignment can be performed by resetting a home position of the pan tilt zoom axis.
[0067] In order to perform this scheme, it is necessary to determine the orientation of the alignable components at least in a relative sense. In a preferred form, orientation about a pan axis can be performed by providing the first alignable component 502 with an electronic compass to determine its orientation. This orientation can then be used to set the zero point of the pan mechanism of the pan tilt zoom camera of the second monitoring subsystem.
[0068] As will be appreciated, a combination of the two mechanisms can be performed. For example, in some embodiments the position of the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem can be determined using a sensor system such as an electronic compass and the output of the electronic compass can then be used to cause a physical realignment of the alignable component of the second monitoring subsystem. In order to do this automatically, the mounting arrangement or second alignable component can be fitted with a drive system such as an electric motor or other actuator which drives rotation of the second alignable component with respect to the mounting arrangement 506 until it is aligned correctly with respect to the alignable component of the first monitoring subsystem. It should also be noted that both alignable component can be fitted with orientation sensors such that their relative alignment can be determined, as opposed to using an absolute alignment with respect to magnetic or true north.
[0069] In addition to the advantages described in connection with commissioning and maintaining a system using embodiment of the present invention, certain embodiments have advantageous properties for use in detecting events as will now be described.
[0070]
[0071] In
[0072]
[0073] Once such a detection event has been resolved, the field of view of the PTZ camera 1006 is returned to its home position, which is aligned with the field of view of PIR detector 1004A.
[0074] By using the scheme as described above, double knock reliability can be performed over an extended area without providing each PIR detector with an associated camera.
[0075] Whilst the alignment of the field of view of the camera 1006 and PIR detector 1004B will be performed using a relatively conventional commissioning process. The overall commissioning burden of this two PIR system will not be greatly increased over a conventional single PIR camera system because of the alignment of the fields of view of the camera 1006 and the PIR detector 1004A is greatly simplified using the schemes described above.
[0076] As will be appreciated the system can be extended to cover any number of first and second monitoring subsystems and is not limited to the two PIR, one camera example given.
[0077] It will be understood that the invention disclosed and defined in this specification extends to all alternative combinations of two or more of the individual features mentioned or evident from the text or drawings. All of these different combinations constitute various alternative aspects of the invention.