USE OF BIOMARKER IN PREPARATION OF LUNG CANCER DETECTION REAGENT AND RELATED METHOD

Abstract

A medical diagnosis screens a biomarker for lung cancer detection by utilizing serum metabonomics. The medical diagnosis includes a biomarker for differential diagnosis between patients with lung cancer and healthy people, and between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules, and a biomarker for differential diagnosis between patients with lung cancer and healthy people, and between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules according to gender differences between a man and a woman. The biomarker is of great significance especially in the differential diagnosis of whether a patient with nodules in the lung has lung cancer.

Claims

1. A method for detecting whether an individual has lung cancer, comprising: detecting a biomarker in a biosample so as to determine a concentration of the biomarker or relative abundance of the biomarker, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 2−Pyrrolidone, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, 3b,16a-Dihydroxyandrostenone sulfate, 3-Chlorotyrosine, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Acetophenone, Acetylcarnitine, Alanine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Aminoadipic acid, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Asparagine, Bilirubin, Carnitine, Choline Sulfate, cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine, Citrulline, Creatinine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Diethylamine, Dihydrothymine, Dihydroxybenzoic acid, Docosahexaenoic acid, Ecgonine, Ergothioneine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Glutamine, Hexanoylcarnitine, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hydroxybutyric acid, Hypoxanthine, Inosine, Isoleucine, Kynurenine, Lactic acid, Leucine, Linoleyl carnitine, Lysine, Methylacetoacetic acid, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, Nicotine, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Phenylalanine, Pilocarpine, Propionylcarnitine, Pyruvic acid, Serotonin, Succinic acid semialdehyde, Trimethylamine N-oxide, Tyrosine, Uridine, Urocanic acid, Xanthine, 4-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid, Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, Androsterone sulfate, Dihydrotestosterone sulfate, Epiandrosterone sulfate, Citric acid, Uric acid, Pantothenic acid, Indole-3-acetic acid, gamma-Butyrobetaine, Calcitriol, all-trans-retinal, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, Caprylic acid, Arachidic acid, Hydrocortisone Valerate, Dopamine, Tryptophan, 3-Hydroxybutyric acid, Arachidonic acid, Decanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydodecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoylcarnitine, Homo-L-arginine, 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate, Pregnenolone sulfate, Tiglylcarnitine, 3-hydroxybutyrylcarnitine, Oxindole, Phenylacetylglutamine, Aminocaproic acid, Methylimidazoleacetic acid.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: alpha-Eleostearic acid, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 2-trans, 4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, 3-Chlorotyrosine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, Acetophenone, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Dihydroxybenzoic acid, Docosahexaenoic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Hexanoylcarnitine, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Lactic acid, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Pyruvic acid, Serotonin, Succinic acid semialdehyde, Xanthine.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the detection comprises detecting whether an individual without nodules in the lung has lung cancer.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the detection comprises detecting whether an individual with pulmonary nodules has lung cancer.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-Pyrrolidone, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Acetylcarnitine, Bilirubin, Choline Sulfate, cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine, Citrulline, Creatinine, Diethylamine, Dihydrothymine, Glutamine, Hydroxybutyric acid, Inosine, Kynurenine, Linoleyl carnitine, Lysine, Trimethylamine N-oxide.

7. The method according to claim 5, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Inosine, Lactic acid, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Trimethylamine N-oxide.

8. (canceled)

9. (canceled)

10. The methodusc according to claim 19, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Acetylcarnitine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Diethylamine, Docosahexaenoic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Glutamine, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Inosine, Linoleyl carnitine, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Pyruvic acid, Trimethylamine N-oxide.

11. The method according to claim 19, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Aminoadipic acid, Bilirubin, Dihydrothymine, Ergothioneine, Lactic acid, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Nicotine.

12. The method according to claim 19, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: alpha-Eleostearic acid, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, 3 -hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3 -hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, Acetylcarnitine, Bilirubin, Diethylamine, Dihydrothymine, Docosahexaenoic acid, Glutamine, Linoleyl carnitine, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, Pyruvic acid, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Aminoadipic acid, Ergothioneine, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Nicotine.

13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Aminoadipic acid, Ergothioneine, Nicotine.

14. (canceled)

15. (canceled)

16. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 2−Pyrrolidone, 3-Chlorotyrosine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Acetophenone, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Choline Sulfate, Citrulline, Creatinine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Hexanoylcarnitine, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Inosine, Lactic acid, Lysine, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Serotonin, Succinic acid semialdehyde, Trimethylamine N-oxide, Xanthine.

17. (canceled)

18. (canceled)

19. The method according to claim 16, wherein the biomarker is Phenylalanine.

20. The method according to claim 1, wherein when it is detected whether an individual with nodules in the lung has lung cancer, the detection method comprises substituting the relative abundance of the biomarker into the following model equation: Logit(P)=ln[P/((1−P)]=5.553×V04+2.92×V05+2.713×V06−0.332×V07−1.798×V10−7.922×V13−0.593×V14+0.643×V17−2.187×V19−0.992×V20−2.352×V33−1.441×V38+7.214×V39−1.22×V40−1.235×V42+1.61; wherein V04, V05, V06, V07, V10, V13, V14, V17, V19, V20, V33, V38, V39, V40, V42 are respectively the 5-Oxoproline, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, Hypoxanthine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Docosahexaenoic acid, Hydroxybutyric acid, Serotonin, Ecgonine, Lysine, Kynurenine, Inosine, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, Linoleylcarnitine, and wherein the individual is a woman.

21. method according to claim 1, wherein when it is detected whether an man with nodules in the lung has lung cancer, the detection method comprises substituting the relative abundance of the biomarker into the following model equation: Logit(P)=ln[P/((1−P)]=6.283×MV02−0.646×MV10−2.758×MV13+1.864×MV15−1.126×MV19−1.145×MV27−3.918×MV30+1.494; wherein MV02, MV10, MV13, MV15, MV19, MV27, MV30 are respectively the 5-Oxoproline, Nicotine, Ecgonine, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Docosahexaenoic acid, Linoleyl carnitine.

22-43. (canceled)

44. The method according to claim 1, wherein when it is detected whether an individual with nodules in the lung has lung cancer, the relative abundance of the biomarkers is substituted into one or more of the following models: model A: ln[P/(1−P)]=2.29×M1+1.02×M2+0.64×M3+0.62×M4+0.47×M5+0.42×M6+0.38×M7+0.26×M8+0.05×M9+0.03×M10−0.05×M11−0.12×M12−0.16×M13−0.17×M14−0.36×M15−0.4×M16−0.45×M17−0.46×M18−0.47×M19−0.53×M20−0.55×M21−0.79×M22−0.95×M23−1.02×M24−1.19×M25−1.52 ×M26−1.88×M27+4.01, wherein M1-M27 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Alanine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Xanthine, 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate, Dihydrothymine, Octanoylcarnitine, Lactic acid, Pregnenolone sulfate, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Choline Sulfate, Trimethylamine N-oxide, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 1-Methylnicotinamide, Serotonin, Docosahexaenoic acid, Decanoylcarnitine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Homo-L-arginine, Pyruvic acid, 3-hydroxydecanoylcarnitine, Ecgonine, Kynurenine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Arabinosylhypoxanthine; model B: ln[P/(1−P)]=1.11×M1+0.25×M2+0.13 ×M3+0.09×M4+0.05×M5−0.01×M6−0.02×M7−0.02×M8−0.04×M9−0.11×M10−0.12×M11−0.19×M12−0.3×M13−0.34×M14−0.45×M15−0.46×M16−0.64×M17−0.68×M18−0.95×M19+2.17, wherein M1-M19 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Alanine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate, Dihydrothymine, Trimethylamine N-oxide, Serotonin, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Hippuric acid, Docosahexaenoic acid, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 1-Methylnicotinamide, Homo-L-arginine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Kynurenine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Arabinosylhypoxanthine; model C: ln[P/(1−P)]=1.73×M1+0.72×M2+0.31×M3+0.29×M4+0.23×M5+0.15×M6−0.05×M7−0.07×M8−0.07×M9−0.09×M10−0.09×M11−0.16×M12−0.26×M13−0.26×M14−0.27×M15−0.29×M16−0.43×M17−0.45×M18−0.56×M19−0.75×M20−0.87×M21−1.15×M22−1.41×M23+3.07, wherein M1-M23 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Alanine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate, Dihydrothymine, Xanthine, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Choline Sulfate, Decanoylcarnitine, Trimethylamine N-oxide, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, PyruMic acid, Docosahexaenoic acid, 1-Methylnicotinamide, Serotonin, Homo-L-arginine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, Ecgonine, Kynurenine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Arabinosylhypoxanthine; model D: ln[P/(1−P)]=2.35×M1+1.03×M2+0.71×M3+0.68×M4+0.48×M5+0.45×M6+0.42×M7+0.39×M8+0.16×M9+0.03×M10−0.05×M11−0.12×M12−0.17×M13−0.17×M14−0.22×M15−0.39×M16−0.43×M17−0.46×M18−0.49×M19−0.54×M20−0.54×M21−0.57×M22−0.89×M23−0.97×M24−1.07×M25−1.23×M26−1.56×M27−1.93×M28+4.16, wherein M1-M28 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Alanine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Xanthine, Octanoylcarnitine, 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate, Dihydrothymine, Lactic acid, Pregnenolone sulfate, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Choline Sulfate, Trimethylamine N-oxide, Hexanoylcarnitine, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 1-Methylnicotinamide, Serotonin, Docosahexaenoic acid, Decanoylcarnitine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Homo-L-arginine, Pyruvic acid, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, Ecgonine, Kynurenine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Arabinosylhypoxanthine; model E: ln[P/(1−P)]=1.41×V1+0.26×V2+0.04×V3−0.01×V4−0.05×V5−0.09×V6−0.19×V7−0.2×V8−0.32×V9−0.34×V10−0.4×V11−0.48×V12−0.55×V13−0.64×V14−1.07×V15−1.58×V16+3.44, V1-V16 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Alanine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 3-hydroxybutyrylcarnitine, Nicotine, Hippuric acid, Citrulline, Trimethylamine N-oxide, alpha-Eleostearic acid, 1-Methylnicotinamide, 3-hydroxydecanoylcarnitine, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Lysine; model F: ln[P/(1−P)]=1.51×V1+0.29×V2+0.06×V3−0.03×V4−0.03×V5−0.03×V6−0.07×V7−0.1×V8−0.21×V9−0.22×V10−0.33×V11−0.35×V12−0.39×V13−0.51×V14−0.59×V15−0.63 ×V16−1.12×V17−1.69×V18+3.65, wherein V1-V18 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Alanine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Decanoylcarnitine, Ergothioneine, Nicotine, Hippuric acid, Trimethylamine N-oxide, Citrulline, alpha-Eleostearic acid, 1-Methylnicotinamide, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, 2-trans, 4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Lysine; model G: ln[P/(1−P)]=1.67×V1+0.34×V2+0.1×V3+0.01×V4−0.08×V5−0.08×V6−0.09×V7−0.1×V8−0.12×V9−0.23×V10−0.27×V11−0.36×V12−0.36×V13−0.38×V14−0.56×V15−0.61×V16−0.66×V17−1.2×V18−1.89×V19+4, wherein V1-V19 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Alanine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, Aminocaproic acid, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Ergothioneine, Decanoylcarnitine, Nicotine, Hippuric acid, Trimethylamine N-oxide, Citrulline, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, 1-Methylnicotinamide, Ecgonine, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Lysine; model H: ln[P/(1−P)]=2.03×V1+0.47×V2+0.15×V3+0.09×V4+0.04×V5+0.03×V6+0.01×V7−0.12×V8−0.12×V9−0.13×V10−0.14×V11−0.14×V12−0.27×V13−0.36×V14−0.37×V15−0.37×V16−0.4×V17−0.43×V18−0.59×V19−0.63×V20−0.75×V21−1.37×V22−2.18×V23+4.56, wherein V1-V22 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Alanine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, Tiglylcarnitine, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Aminocaproic acid, Oxindole, Decanoylcarnitine, Nicotine, Ergothioneine, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Hippuric acid, Trimethylamine N-oxide, Lactic acid, Citrulline, alpha-Eleostearic acid, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Lysine; or model I: ln[P/(1−P)]=3.08×V1+1.26×V2+0.7×V3+0.64×V4+0.41×V5+0.4×V6+0.38×V7+0.31×V8+0.31×V9+0.1×V10+0.09×V11+0.09×V12+0.04×V13−0.04×V14−0.04×V15−0.07×V16−0.12×V17−0.17×V18−0.24×V19−0.24×V20−0.26×V21−0.31×V22−0.32×V23−0.44×V24−0.44×V25−0.49×V26−0.53×V27−0.63×V28−0.73×V29−0.79×V30−0.81×V31−0.81×V32−0.85×V33−1.2×V34−1.62×V35−1.72×V36−3.68×V37+7.11, wherein V1-V37 are respectively relative abundances of Hypoxanthine, Octanoylcarnitine, Alanine, 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, Xanthine, 2-Ketobutyric acid, Oxindole, Tiglylcarnitine, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Aminocaproic acid, Methylimidazoleacetic acid, Homo-L-arginine, Pyruvic acid, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, Propionylcarnitine, Nicotine, Serotonin, Phenylacetylglutamine, Hippuric acid, Ergothioneine, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Inosine, Citrulline, Trimethylamine N-oxide, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, 1-Methylnicotinamide, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, Hexanoylcarnitine, Decanoylcarnitine, Ecgonine, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Lactic acid, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Lysine.

45-50. (canceled)

51. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: Decanoylcarnitine, 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate, Pregnenolone sulfate, Tiglylcarnitine, Oxindole, Phenylacetylglutamine, Aminocaproic acid, Methylimidazoleacetic acid.

52. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Octanoylcarnitine, Decanoylcarnitine, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, Hexanoylcarnitine, 3 -hydroxydodecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoylcarnitine, Ecgonine, Trimethylamine N-oxide, 1-Methylnicotinamide, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Homo-L-arginine, Serotonin, Alanine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Inosine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Hippuric acid, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Lactic acid, 2-Ketobutyric acid, Pyruvic acid, Hypoxanthine, Xanthine.

53. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Octanoylcarnitine, Decanoylcarnitine, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, Hexanoylcarnitine, 3 -hydroxydodecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoylcarnitine, Ecgonine, Trimethylamine N-oxide, 1-Methylnicotinamide, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Homo-L-arginine, Serotonin, Alanine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Inosine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Hippuric acid, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Lactic acid, 2-Ketobutyric acid, Pyruvic acid, Hypoxanthine, Xanthine, Kynurenine, cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine, Docosahexaenoic acid, Choline Sulfate, Dihydrothymine, 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate, Pregnenolone sulfate.

54. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biomarker is selected from one or more of: 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Octanoylcarnitine, Decanoylcarnitine, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, Hexanoylcarnitine, 3 -hydroxydodecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoylcarnitine, Ecgonine, Trimethylamine N-oxide, 1-Methylnicotinamide, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Homo-L-arginine, Serotonin, Alanine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Inosine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Hippuric acid, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Lactic acid, 2-Ketobutyric acid, Pyruvic acid, Hypoxanthine, Xanthine, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Tiglylcarnitine, Propionylcarnitine, 3-hydroxybutyrylcarnitine, Oxindole, Nicotine, Ergothioneine, Phenylacetylglutamine, Citrulline, Lysine, Aminocaproic acid, Methylimidazoleacetic acid.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0094] FIG. 1 is an analysis flow chart;

[0095] FIG. 2A is a total ion current diagram and FIG. 2B is a mass spectrum diagram;

[0096] FIG. 3 is a diagram showing PLS-DA statistical results of three groups, a group of a population with lung cancer, a group of a population with benign pulmonary nodules and a group of healthy population (−ESI: negative spectrum; and +ESI: normal spectrum);

[0097] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing PLS-DA statistical results of the group of a population with lung cancer and the group of healthy population (-ESI: negative spectrum; and +ESI: normal spectrum);

[0098] FIG. 5 is a diagram showing PLS-DA statistical results of the group of a population with lung cancer and the a group of the population with benign pulmonary nodules (−ESI: negative spectrum; and +ESI: normal spectrum);

[0099] FIG. 6 shows a differential metabolite that is common in the patient with lung cancer and the patient with benign pulmonary nodules in men and women, and differential metabolites specific to the patient with lung cancer and the patient with benign pulmonary nodules in men or women.

[0100] FIG. 7 shows an ROC curve of model A-1;

[0101] FIG. 8 shows an ROC curve of model B-2;

[0102] FIG. 9 shows an ROC curve of model C-3;

[0103] FIG. 10 shows an ROC curve of model D-4;

[0104] FIG. 11 shows the prediction results for lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules in model A-1;

[0105] FIG. 12 is a diagram showing PLS-DA statistical results of normal spectrum (+ESI) and negative spectrum (−ESI) of three groups, i.e., the group of a population with lung cancer, the group of the population with benign pulmonary nodules and the group of healthy people (−ESL negative spectrum; and +ESI: normal spectrum);

[0106] FIG. 13 shows an ROC curve of model A;

[0107] FIG. 14 shows an ROC curve of model B;

[0108] FIG. 15 shows an ROC curve of model C;

[0109] FIG. 16 shows an ROC curve of model D;

[0110] FIG. 17 shows an ROC curve of model E;

[0111] FIG. 18 shows an ROC curve of model F;

[0112] FIG. 19 shows an ROC curve of model G;

[0113] FIG. 20 shows an ROC curve of model H; and

[0114] FIG. 21 shows an ROC curve of model I;

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0115] (1) Diagnosis or Detection

[0116] Here diagnosis or detection refers to detecting or assaying a biomarker in a sample, or detecting the content of a target biomarker, e.g., absolute content or relative content, and then explaining whether an individual from which the sample is provided has a certain disease or the possibility of suffering from a certain disease through the presence or quantity of the target biomarker.

[0117] Here the meanings of diagnosis and detection can be used interchangeably. The result of this detection or diagnosis cannot be directly used as the direct result of suffering from the disease, but an intermediate result. If it is wanted to obtain a direct result, a certain disease can only be confirmed further by means of other auxiliary means such as pathology or anatomy. For example, the invention provides a variety of novel biomarkers with relevance to lung cancer, and changes in the contents of these biomarkers are directly related to whether suffering from lung cancer.

[0118] (2) Relationship Between Marker and Lung Cancer

[0119] Here the relationship means that the appearance of a certain biomarker in a sample or the change of its content is directly related to a specific disease. For example the relative increase or decrease of its content indicates that the possibility of suffering from this disease is higher than that of healthy people.

[0120] If multiple different markers are found in a sample at the same time or their contents changes relatively, it indicates that the possibility of suffering from this disease is higher than that of healthy people. That is, among the species of markers, some markers have a stronger correlation with suffering from the disease, while some markers have a weaker correlation with suffering from the disease, or even some markers have no correlation with a specific disease. One or more of those markers with strong correlation can be used as biomarkers for diagnosing the disease, and those with weak correlation can be combined with strong markers to diagnose certain diseases, thereby increasing the accuracy of detection results.

[0121] For the plurality of biomarkers in the serum found by the invention, these biomarkers all can be used for distinguishing the population with lung cancer from healthy people or population with pulmonary nodules. Here, the marker can be used as a single marker for direct detection or diagnosis. Selection of such a marker indicates that the relative change in the content of the marker has a strong correlation with lung cancer. Of course, it can be understood that one or more markers with strong correlation with lung cancer can be selected for simultaneous detection. The normal understanding is that in some embodiments, the selection of highly correlated biomarkers for detection or diagnosis can achieve certain standard accuracy, such as the accuracy of 60%, 65%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 90% or 95%, then it can show that these biomarkers can obtain an intermediate value for diagnosis of a certain disease, but it does not mean that it can be directly confirmed to have the disease. For example, in the invention, among the biomarkers in Tables 2-9, the biomarker with higher VIP value can be selected as a marker for diagnosing whether suffering from lung cancer, or as a marker for screening out the population with lung cancer from healthy population or the population with pulmonary nodules, and here the population includes both people without gender differences and people with gender differences.

[0122] Of course, the one with the higher ROC value can also be selected as a diagnostic marker. The so-called strong and weak are generally confirmed by some algorithms, such as the contribution rate of the marker to lung cancer or weight analysis thereof. Such calculation methods can be significance analysis (p value or FDR value) and Fold change. Multivariate statistical analysis mainly includes principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Of course, it also includes other methods, e.g., ROC analysis and so on. Of course, other model prediction methods are also possible. During specific selection of a biomarker, the marker disclosed by the invention can be selected, or other well-known markers can be selected or used in combination.

[0123] In order to describe the invention more specifically, the technical solution of the invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific examples. These explanations only show how the invention is implemented, but do not define the specific scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is defined in the claims.

EXAMPLE 1

Collection of Serum Samples

[0124] Serum samples were collected from patients of different genders and ages and healthy people. In this study, samples of men and women aged between 38-78 were collected, including three groups of serum samples from patients with lung cancer (138 cases), patients with benign pulmonary nodules (170 cases) and healthy people (174 cases), which were matched according to gender and age.

EXAMPLE 2

Extraction of Serum Metabolites

[0125] Serum metabolites were extracted by a three-phase extraction method of methyl tert-butyl ether:methanol:water (10:3:2.5, v/v/v). The specific operation was as follows: (1) the serum sample was placed on ice and completely thawed, 50 uL of the sample was taken into a 1.5 mL EP tube, added with 225 μL of frozen methanol, and subjected to vortex for 30 seconds; (2) it was added with 750 μL of frozen MTBE, subjected to vortex for 30 seconds, and shaken on ice at 400 rpm for 1 hour; (3) it was then added with 188 μL of pure water and subjected to vortex for 1 minute; (4) it was centrifuged at 15,000 rcf for 10 minutes at 4° C.; and (5) upon centrifugation, 125 μL of the subnatant was taken into an EP tube and spin-dried with a vacuum freeze dryer, and all the dry samples of serum metabolites were stored in a refrigerator at −80° C. until testing.

[0126] Considering that there might be batch errors in sample pretreatment, in this study, processing of each batch of experimental samples was conducted simultaneously with the processing of one Reference serum for subsequent data correction. The Reference serum sample was prepared by mixing sera from 100 healthy people (healthy people referred to the people whose blood pressure, blood sugar and blood routine were all normal and that had no hepatitis B virus, and of which the physical examination results showed no obvious diseases, so that they did not need to see a doctor for treatment currently). The men and women from which the sera of 100 healthy people were derived were of the equal number, and were aged between 40-55. The subjects needed to fast overnight and forbid taking drugs 72 hours before blood collection, and individuals with past disease history and body mass indexes (BM's) outside the 95th percentile were excluded. The mixed serum was sub-packaged in 50 μL per portion and stored in a refrigerator at −80° C.

EXAMPLE 3

Detection of Extracted Serum Metabolites and Data Preprocessing

[0127] (1) Reconstitution of serum metabolites: the dry extract of serum metabolites was added with 120 μL of a reconstitution solvent (acetonitrile:water=4:1), subjected to vortex for 5 minutes, and then centrifuges at 4° C. for 15,000×g for 10 minutes, and 100 μL of the supernatant was taken into a liner tube to prepare a sample to be tested.

[0128] (2) QC sample: each 10 μL of the serum samples to be tested from patients with lung cancer, patients with benign pulmonary nodules and healthy people was taken, subjected to vortex, and mixed evenly with shaking to prepare a QC sample.

[0129] (3) Sample detection method: detection was conducted with liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS).

[0130] I. Liquid Chromatography Conditions

[0131] Chromatographic Column: BEH Amide (100×2.1 mm, 1.7 μm).

[0132] Mobile phase: in positive mode, phase A was acetonitrile; water=95:5 (10 mM ammonium acetate, 0.1% formic acid), and phase B was acetonitrile:water=50:50 (10 mM ammonium acetate, 0.1% formic acid); and in negative mode, phase A was acetonitrile:water=95:5 (10 mM ammonium acetate, pH=9.0, adjusted by aqueous ammonia), and phase B was acetonitrile: water=50:50 (10 mM ammonium acetate, pH=9.0, adjusted by aqueous ammonia).

[0133] The elution gradient was shown in Table 1 below:

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Elution gradient of LC-HRMS mobile phase Time (min) Flow rate (mL/min) Phase A Phase B 0.0 0.30 98 2 0.50 0.30 98 2 12.0 0.30 50 50 14.0 0.30 2 98 16.0 0.30 2 98 16.1 0.30 98 2 20.0 0.30 98 2

[0134] II. Mass Spectrometry Conditions

[0135] The model of a mass spectrometer was Q Exactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific Company, USA), and qualitative analysis was carried out by employing an electrospray ion source (ESI), a positive and negative Fullscan mode (Full Scan) and a data dependent scan mode (ddMS2). The spray voltage was+3,800/-3,200 V; the atomization temperature was 350° C.; high-purity nitrogen was used as sheath gas and auxiliary gas, and the parameters were set to 40 arb and 10 arb; respectively; the temperature of ion transfer tube was 320° C.; the mass scanning range was 70-1,050 m/z; the primary scan resolution was 70,000 FWHM, and the secondary scan resolution was 35,000 FWHM.

[0136] III. Injecting Method

[0137] Before each detection, six syringe volumes of the QC sample were injected to stabilize the detection system. The serum sample was injected in a random manner, in which testing of one syringe volume of the QC sample was inserted every injection of 10 syringe volumes of the serum samples. The first syringe and last syringe in the detection sequence were both the QC sample. Finally, the QC sample was subjected to full scanning and segmented scanning by ddMS2 for compound identification.

[0138] (4) Data Preprocessing

[0139] I. Raw Data Matrix

[0140] The raw data of each sample included total ion current data and mass spectrum data (as shown in FIG. 2). All the raw data of the sample was imported into Compound Discovery software to get the information of m/z ions and retention time, and the database (mzCloud and Chemspider) was searched to get the identification results of the compound. Further, according to the information of m/z ions and retention time, the chromatographic integration of each sample was carried out by using Tracefinder software, so as to obtain more accurate peak area information. Finally, a two-dimensional data matrix containing characteristic ions (a combination of m/z ions and retention time) and contents thereof (peak area) was obtained for each sample.

[0141] II. Excision and Interpolation of Data Missing Values

[0142] There were often data missing values in the original data matrix of metabonomics, which were mainly related to the detection of background noise, peak extraction and peak alignment methods of mass spectrometry, etc. Too many zero or missing values would bring difficulties to downstream analysis. Therefore, characteristic ions with missing values greater than 50% in all samples were generally excised, and the missing values of other compounds were interpolated. In this study, MetaboAnalyst 5.0 analysis software was used for processing the missing values, and a K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) manner was selected for interpolation.

[0143] III. Data Correction and Filtering

[0144] A large amount of sample pretreatment was inevitably limited by the throughput of experimental treatment, so it was necessary to carry out sample pretreatment in batches. However, due to the multifarious types of metabolites, large differences in physical and chemical properties, and expensive isotope internal standards, it was difficult to choose an appropriate isotope internal standard that could meet the full coverage. Aiming at this problem, this study selected a reference serum that is processed simultaneously with the batch processing as a natural “like internal standard” to correct batch errors caused by pretreatment. That was, the original data of the experimental samples of each pretreatment batch was normalized based on the data of the Reference serum of the corresponding batch to obtain the relative abundance of each characteristic ion, and the characteristic ion with RSD>30% in the QC sample was deleted to obtain the final analysis data matrix.

EXAMPLE 4

Samples were Grouped by Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis, So as to Screen Out Differential Metabolites in Different Groups in Connection with Significance Analysis

[0145] Metabonomics generally adopted the combination of univariate analysis and multivariate statistical analysis to screen differential metabolites, in which the univariate analysis mainly included significance analysis (p value or FDR value) and Fold change of characteristic ions in different groups, while the multivariate statistical analysis mainly included principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA).

[0146] Before statistical analysis, the data should be properly normalized, transformed and scaled. In this study, MetaboAnalyst 5.0 analysis software was used for statistical analysis, and data normalization by the sum, Log transformation and Auto scaling were carried out. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed on the three groups of lung cancer, benign pulmonary nodules and healthy people (as shown in FIG. 3), and obvious grouping results were obtained.

[0147] Further, PLS-DA analysis between two groups of patients with lung cancer and healthy people, patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules was carried out (as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5), variable importance for the projection (VIP) was calculated to measure the influence strength and explanatory power of the expression pattern of each metabolite on the discrimination of classification of each group of samples, a Wilcoxon rank sum test was further carried out to obtain the corrected p value (FDR), and the fold change (FC) between two groups was calculated according to the intra-group average.

[0148] According to the screening criteria of the differential metabolite: (1) VIP>1; (2) when FDR<0.05, i.e. VIP>1 and FDR<0.05, it was judged that there was a significant difference in the metabolite between the two groups, and the metabolite was the differential metabolite between the two groups. Moreover, in the process of screening the differential metabolites, it was found that the differential metabolites for different genders were different, so the differential metabolites were further differentiated according to gender.

[0149] The main significant differential metabolites found by the invention were:

[0150] 1. differential metabolites between the group of patients with lung cancer and the group of healthy people were shown in Table 2 below.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and healthy samples (without nodules) Related metabolic No. Name FDR VIP FC pathway 1 Hippuric acid 4.02E−07 1.78 0.49 Phenylalanine metabolism 2 Hypoxanthine 1.16E−05 1.43 1.17 Purine Metabolism 3 Serotonin 1.47E−06 1.01 0.80 Tryptophan Metabolism 4 Lactic acid 2.77E−03 1.15 1.11 Gluconeogenesis, Pyruvate Metabolism 5 2-Octenoyl- 1.24E−05 1.47 0.72 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 6 2-trans,4-cis- 2.74E−13 1.93 0.64 Lipid metabolism pathway Decadienoyl- carnitine 7 3-hydroxy- 2.58E−11 1.49 0.74 Lipid metabolism pathway decanoyl carnitine 8 3-hydroxy- 1.73E−09 1.96 0.70 Lipid metabolism pathway dodecanoyl- carnitine 9 3-hydroxy- 1.86E−09 1.26 0.78 Lipid metabolism pathway octanoyl carnitine 10 Hexanoyl- 1.14E−06 1.16 0.75 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 11 Octanoyl- 1.09E−09 1.60 0.67 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 12 Xanthine 3.86E−04 1.23 1.18 Purine Metabolism 13 Arabinosyl- 2.89E−12 2.28 0.40 N/A hypoxanthine 14 Uridine 5.78E−03 1.06 0.87 Pyrimidine Metabolism 15 Ecgonine 1.28E−10 1.53 0.69 N/A 16 N-Acetyl- 1.43E−04 1.21 1.09 N/A L-alanine 17 Acetophenone 5.65E−04 1.38 0.67 N/A 18 Succinic acid 6.80E−03 1.07 1.24 Alanine, aspartate and semialdehyde glutamate metabolism, Butanoate metabolism 19 Cyclohexane- 2.56E−03 1.15 0.71 N/A acetic acid 20 Dihydroxy- 1.42E−03 1.26 0.74 N/A benzoic acid 21 Pyruvic acid 1.15E−04 1.37 1.26 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle), Pyruvate metabolism 22 Ethyl 3- 7.74E−05 1.43 0.76 N/A oxohexanoate 23 2-Ketobutyric 7.53E−03 1.01 1.24 Methionine Metabolism, acid Glycine and Serine Metabolism, Selenoamino Acid Metabolism 24 Methylaceto- 3.48E−03 1.02 1.07 N/A acetic acid 25 Homo-L- 8.31E−09 1.17 0.78 N/A arginine 26 5-Oxoproline 5.19E−11 1.92 1.17 Glutathione metabolism 27 3- 5.67E−05 1.49 0.48 N/A Chlorotyrosine 28 Docosa- 9.94E−04 1.03 0.84 Biosynthesis hexaenoic of unsaturated acid fatty acids 29 alpha- 2.31E−09 1.47 0.75 N/A Eleostearic acid Note: FC in the table was the multiple ratio of the lung cancer samples to the healthy samples; and N/A indicated that no relevant metabolic pathway had been found.

[0151] 2. Different metabolites between group of patients with lung cancer and the group of patients with benign pulmonary nodules were shown in Table 3 below.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Differential metabolites between the lung cancer (lung malignant tumor) samples and the samples with benign lung nodules Related metabolic No. Name FDR VIP FC pathway 1 Hippuric acid 3.55E−05 1.64 0.59 Phenylalanine metabolism 2 Hypoxanthine 7.34E−06 1.67 1.15 Purine Metabolism 3 Trimethylamine 7.66E−06 1.43 0.73 N/A N-oxide 4 1-Methyl- 2.85E−07 1.70 0.71 Nicotinate and nicotinamide Nicotinamide Metabolism 5 Lactic acid 1.14E−05 1.69 1.13 Gluconeogenesis, Pyruvate Metabolism 6 Kynurenine 7.90E−05 1.12 0.82 Tryptophan Metabolism 7 Serotonin 4.24E−06 1.50 0.79 Tryptophan Metabolism 8 Linoleyl carnitine 1.66E−05 1.23 0.78 Lipid metabolism pathway 9 Acetylcarnitine 7.11E−04 1.10 0.92 Beta Oxidation of Very Long Chain Fatty Acids 10 2-Octenoyl- 3.91E−06 1.41 0.70 Lipid metabolism carnitine pathway 11 2-trans,4-cis- 6.96E−05 1.39 0.77 Lipid metabolism Decadienoyl- pathway carnitine 12 3-hydroxy- 8.74E−09 1.85 0.69 Lipid metabolism decanoyl pathway carnitine 13 3-hydroxydo- 2.46E−06 1.36 0.65 Lipid metabolism decanoyl carnitine pathway 14 3-hydroxy- 1.30E−08 1.78 0.72 Lipid metabolism octanoyl carnitine pathway 15 Hexanoyl- 1.17E−03 1.12 0.86 Lipid metabolism carnitine pathway 16 cis-5-Tetra- 6.74E−03 1.08 0.82 Lipid metabolism decenoylcarnitine pathway 17 Octanoylcarnitine 7.72E−06 1.40 0.77 Lipid metabolism pathway 18 Xanthine 1.03E−03 1.36 1.14 Purine Metabolism 19 Arabinosyl- 1.44E−13 2.66 0.34 N/A hypoxanthine 20 Inosine 2.94E−12 1.84 0.39 Purine Metabolism 21 Dihydrothymine 2.99E−03 1.05 1.17 Pyrimidine Metabolism 22 Creatinine 4.75E−03 1.04 0.97 Arginine and proline metabolism 23 Bilirubin 1.21E−03 1.20 0.84 Porphyrin Metabolism 24 Ecgonine 8.06E−10 1.90 0.66 N/A 25 Choline Sulfate 1.04E−06 1.20 0.78 N/A 26 4-oxo- 2.40E−05 1.42 0.70 Retinol Metabolism Retinoic acid 27 Acetophenone 5.21E−03 1.14 0.70 N/A 28 Diethylamine 5.77E−04 1.16 0.96 N/A 29 7-Methylguanine 9.88E−05 1.35 0.92 N/A 30 Homo-L-arginine 1.98E−07 1.49 0.78 N/A 31 N-Acetyl- 1.26E−04 1.37 1.06 N/A L-alanine 32 5-Oxoproline 1.44E−13 2.40 1.17 Glutathione metabolism 33 Citrulline 2.78E−04 1.14 0.93 Arginine and Proline Metabolism, Aspartate Metabolism, Urea Cycle 34 Glutamine 2.33E−04 1.14 0.95 Pyrimidine Metabolism, Glutamate Metabolism 35 Lysine 3.04E−04 1.04 0.95 Lysine Degradation, Biotin Metabolism 36 3-Chlorotyrosine 1.06E−03 1.41 0.61 N/A 37 2-Pyrrolidone 2.00E−05 1.34 1.21 N/A 38 Hydroxybutyric 1.18E−03 1.33 1.14 Ketone Body acid Metabolism 39 Succinic acid 5.96E−03 1.15 1.21 Alanine, aspartate semialdehyde and glutamate metabolism, Butanoate metabolism 40 Cyclohexane- 2.24E−05 1.56 0.71 N/A acetic acid 41 Dihydroxy- 5.76E−04 1.44 0.65 N/A benzoic acid 42 Pyruvic acid 8.28E−04 1.31 1.20 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle), Pyruvate metabolism 43 Ethyl 3.55E−05 1.53 0.71 N/A 3-oxohexanoate 44 2-Ketobutyric 8.55E−03 1.07 1.21 Methionine acid Metabolism, Glycine and Serine Metabolism, Selenoamino Acid Metabolism 45 Docosahexaenoic 1.14E−05 1.52 0.74 Biosynthesis of acid unsaturated fatty acids 46 alpha-Eleostearic 9.95E−07 1.45 0.74 N/A acid Note: FC in the table was the multiple ratio of the lung cancer samples to the samples with benign pulmonary nodules; and N/A indicated that no relevant metabolic pathway had been found.

[0152] 3. differential metabolites between the group of patients with lung cancer and the group of healthy people in men were shown in Table 4 below.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and healthy samples (without nodules) in men Related metabolic No. Name FDR VIP FC pathway 1 Carnitine 6.65E−05 1.12 0.95 Beta Oxidation of Very Long Chain Fatty Acids, Carnitine Synthesis 2 3b,16a- 1.35E−02 1.13 0.75 Lipid metabolism Dihydroxy- pathway androstenone sulfate 3 Tyrosine 1.70E−04 1.04 0.93 Tyrosine Metabolism, Phenylalanine and TyrosineMetabolism, Catecholamine Biosynthesis 4 Isoleucine 2.58E−05 1.20 0.92 Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis; Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation 5 Leucine 1.80E−05 1.11 0.95 Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis; Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation 6 Lysine 3.08E−05 1.10 0.91 Lysine Degradation, Biotin Metabolism 7 3-Chloro- 8.19E−03 1.37 0.61 N/A tyrosine 8 Hippuric acid 1.58E−03 1.52 0.60 Phenylalanine metabolism 9 Hypoxanthine 5.24E−03 1.13 1.11 Purine Metabolism 10 Trimethyl- 6.11E−06 1.21 0.62 N/A amine N- oxide 11 1-Methyl- 5.22E−04 1.02 0.80 Nicotinate and nicotinamide Nicotinamide Metabolism 12 Linoleyl 1.47E−05 1.18 0.79 Lipid metabolism carnitine pathway 13 2-trans,4-cis- 6.14E−08 1.53 0.61 Lipid metabolism Decadienoyl- pathway carnitine 14 3-hydroxy- 9.50E−06 1.29 0.74 Lipid metabolism decanoyl pathway carnitine 15 3-hydroxy- 4.70E−04 1.01 0.77 Lipid metabolism dodecanoyl pathway carnitine 16 3-hydroxy- 1.72E−05 1.23 0.77 Lipid metabolism octanoyl pathway carnitine 17 Acetyl- 9.47E−06 1.14 0.88 Beta Oxidation of carnitine Very Long Chain Fatty Acids 18 Octanoyl- 2.70E−05 1.13 0.71 Lipid metabolism carnitine pathway 19 Arabinosyl- 3.64E−06 2.11 0.38 N/A hypoxanthine 20 Inosine 1.81E−05 1.14 0.47 Purine Metabolism 21 Ecgonine 1.45E−07 1.37 0.63 N/A 22 N-Acetyl- 8.16E−04 1.35 1.10 N/A L-alanine 23 4-oxo- 1.66E−06 1.26 0.52 Retinol Metabolism Retinoic acid 24 Diethylamine 8.34E−05 1.11 0.95 N/A 25 7-Methyl- 1.81E−05 1.23 0.89 N/A guanine 26 Cyclohexane- 4.77E−02 1.07 0.78 N/A acetic acid 27 Pyruvic acid 4.31E−03 1.37 1.27 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle), Pyruvate metabolism 28 Ethyl 3- 1.54E−02 1.28 0.73 N/A oxohexanoate 29 Homo-L- 5.99E−06 1.03 0.78 N/A arginine 30 5-Oxoproline 5.78E−06 1.74 1.14 Glutathione metabolism 31 Glutamine 1.83E−04 1.11 0.94 Pyrimidine Metabolism, Glutamate Metabolism 32 Pilocarpine 3.19E−07 1.39 0.89 N/A 33 Docosa- 8.12E−04 1.43 0.67 Biosynthesis of hexaenoic unsaturated acid fatty acids 34 alpha- 1.27E−08 1.47 0.66 N/A Eleostearic acid Note: FC in the table was the multiple ratio of the lung cancer samples to the healthy samples in men; and N/A indicated that no relevant metabolic pathway had been found

[0153] 4. Different metabolites between group of patients with lung cancer and the group of patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men were shown in Table 5 below.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Differential metabolites between the lung cancer samples and the samples with benign lung nodules in men Related metabolic No. Name FDR VIP FC pathway 1 Hippuric acid 2.15E−02 1.20 0.68 Phenylalanine metabolism 2 Hypoxanthine 2.96E−04 1.46 1.09 Purine Metabolism 3 Trimethyl- 6.67E−05 1.45 0.65 N/A amine N-oxide 4 1-Methyl- 1.82E−03 1.25 0.80 Nicotinate and nicotinamide Nicotinamide Metabolism 5 Linoleyl 2.09E−11 2.33 0.57 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 6 2-trans,4-cis- 2.25E−05 1.62 0.68 Lipid metabolism pathway Decadienoyl- carnitine 7 3-hydroxy- 3.90E−06 1.73 0.63 Lipid metabolism pathway decanoyl carnitine 8 3-hydroxy- 3.80E−05 1.51 0.60 Lipid metabolism pathway dodecanoyl carnitine 9 3-hydroxy- 1.56E−06 1.75 0.65 Lipid metabolism pathway octanoyl carnitine 10 Acetyl- 3.66E−04 1.23 0.89 Beta Oxidation carnitine of Very Long Chain Fatty Acids 11 Octanoyl- 1.32E−03 1.15 0.83 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 12 Arabinosyl- 8.00E−07 2.26 0.28 N/A hypoxanthine 13 Inosine 2.20E−05 1.31 0.38 Purine Metabolism 14 Ecgonine 3.74E−08 1.96 0.59 N/A 15 N-Acetyl-L- 8.00E−06 1.86 1.09 N/A alanine 16 4-oxo- 4.78E−04 1.22 0.68 Retinol Metabolism Retinoic acid 17 Diethylamine 1.86E−03 1.11 0.96 N/A 18 7-Methyl- 4.37E−03 1.20 0.92 N/A guanine 19 Cyclohexane- 5.25E−04 1.52 0.65 N/A acetic acid 20 Pyruvic acid 5.04E−04 1.46 1.20 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle); Pyruvate metabolism 21 Ethyl 3- 3.57E−04 1.64 0.64 N/A oxohexanoate 22 Homo-L- 6.23E−04 1.12 0.78 N/A arginine 23 5-Oxoproline 4.52E−07 2.04 1.11 Glutathione metabolism 24 Glutamine 1.04E−02 1.09 0.95 Pyrimidine Metabolism; Glutamate Metabolism 25 Docosa- 1.88E−05 1.77 0.57 Biosynthesis hexaenoic of unsaturated acid fatty acids 26 alpha- 4.29E−07 1.69 0.63 N/A Eleostearic acid 27 Lactic acid 9.78E−04 1.48 1.09 Gluconeogenesis, Pyruvate Metabolism 28 2-Octenoyl- 6.82E−05 1.41 0.63 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 29 3-hydroxy- 3.80E−04 1.11 0.83 Lipid metabolism pathway butyryl carnitine 30 Dihydro- 1.64E−03 1.16 1.18 Pyrimidine Metabolism thymine 31 Bilirubin 1.08E−03 1.29 0.77 Porphyrin Metabolism 32 Nicotine 1.78E−04 1.26 0.66 Nicotine Metabolism Pathway 33 Ergothioneine 1.82E−03 1.02 0.74 Histidine metabolism 34 Aminoadipic 6.99E−04 1.44 1.05 Lysine Degradation acid 35 N6,N6,N6- 2.02E−03 1.08 1.39 Carnitine Synthesis Tri- methylysine Note: FC in the table was the multiple ratio of the lung cancer samples to the samples with benign pulmonary nodules in men; and N/A indicated that no relevant metabolic pathway had been found.

[0154] 5. differential metabolites between patients with lung cancer and healthy people in women were shown in Table 6 below.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and healthy samples (without nodules) in women Related metabolic No. Name FDR VIP FC pathway 1 Carnitine 1.32E−03 1.03 0.96 Beta Oxidation of Very Long Chain Fatty Acids, Carnitine Synthesis 2 Alanine 1.35E−03 1.39 1.23 Alanine Metabolism, Urea Cycle, Selenoamino Acid Metabolism 3 Linoleyl 6.64E−04 1.18 1.58 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 4 Propionyl- 5.10E−04 1.08 0.89 Oxidation of carnitine Branched Chain Fatty Acids 5 2-trans,4-cis- 3.06E−06 1.47 0.66 Lipid metabolism pathway Decadienoyl- carnitine 6 3-hydroxy- 2.01E−06 1.29 0.62 Lipid metabolism pathway dodecanoyl carnitine 7 Uridine 2.46E−02 1.07 0.88 Pyrimidine Metabolism 8 Diethylamine 4.61E−03 1.05 0.99 N/A 9 Pyruvic acid 2.60E−02 1.12 1.24 Citrate cycle (TCA cycle), Pyruvate metabolism 10 Methylaceto- 3.27E−02 1.14 1.11 N/A acetic acid 11 Asparagine 8.53E−04 1.08 0.94 Aspartate Metabolism, Ammonia Recycling 12 Urocanic acid 6.75E−04 1.06 0.83 Histidine Metabolism, Ammonia Recycling 13 N6,N6,N6- 4.81E−06 1.40 0.68 Carnitine Synthesis Tri- methylysine 14 Hippuric acid 3.45E−04 1.68 0.40 Phenylalanine metabolism 15 Hypoxanthine 1.61E−03 1.44 1.24 Purine Metabolism 16 Trimethyl- 6.81E−04 1.09 0.54 N/A amine N-oxide 17 1-Methyl- 2.43E−07 1.59 0.71 Nicotinate and nicotinamide Nicotinamide Metabolism 18 Serotonin 5.94E−05 1.23 0.77 Tryptophan Metabolism 19 Lactic acid 4.60E−03 1.40 1.19 Gluconeogenesis, Pyruvate Metabolism 20 3-hydroxy- 2.54E−06 1.36 0.74 Lipid metabolism pathway decanoyl carnitine 21 3-hydroxy- 8.46E−05 1.17 0.80 Lipid metabolism pathway octanoyl carnitine 22 Hexanoyl- 6.64E−04 1.08 0.70 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 23 Octanoyl- 5.05E−05 1.24 0.62 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 24 Xanthine 1.00E−03 1.51 1.23 Purine Metabolism 25 Arabinosyl- 4.59E−07 2.17 0.42 N/A hypoxanthine 26 Inosine 3.11E−08 1.51 0.42 Purine Metabolism 27 Creatinine 6.04E−04 1.15 0.96 Arginine and proline metabolism 28 Ecgonine 1.78E−04 1.20 0.74 N/A 29 4-oxo- 2.04E−05 1.43 0.67 Retinol Metabolism Retinoic acid 30 Acetophenone 1.19E−03 1.58 0.64 N/A 31 7-Methyl- 1.94E−04 1.27 0.92 N/A guanine 32 2-Pyrrolidone 1.76E−08 1.70 1.32 N/A 33 Succinic acid 3.45E−04 1.63 1.47 Alanine, aspartate and semialdehyde glutamate metabolism; Butanoate metabolism 34 Cyclohexane- 3.46E−02 1.01 0.66 N/A acetic acid 35 Ethyl 6.11E−03 1.29 0.80 N/A 3-oxo- hexanoate 36 2-Ketobutyric 4.77E−04 1.60 1.47 Methionine Metabolism; acid Glycine and Serine Metabolism; Selenoamino Acid Metabolism 37 Homo-L- 4.63E−04 1.13 0.78 N/A arginine 38 5-Oxoproline 1.44E−05 1.72 1.21 Glutathione metabolism 39 Citrulline 1.92E−04 1.10 0.90 Arginine and Proline Metabolism; Aspartate Metabolism; Urea Cycle 40 Pilocarpine 5.52E−05 1.37 0.95 N/A 41 Lysine 2.83E−06 1.43 0.86 Lysine Degradation; Biotin Metabolism 42 3-Chloro- 7.21E−03 1.33 0.38 N/A tyrosine 43 Choline 5.98E−05 1.16 0.77 N/A Sulfate Note: FC in the table was the multiple ratio of the lung cancer samples to the healthy samples in women; and N/A indicated that no relevant metabolic pathway had been found

[0155] 6. Different metabolites between group of patients with lung cancer and the group of patients with benign pulmonary nodules in women were shown in Table 7 below.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Differential metabolites between the lung cancer samples and the samples with benign lung nodules in women Related metabolic No. Name FDR VIP FC pathway 1 Hippuric acid 1.34E−03 1.75 0.51 Phenylalanine metabolism 2 Hypoxanthine 2.05E−02 1.51 1.22 Purine Metabolism 3 Trimethylamine 4.24E−02 1.05 0.85 N/A N-oxide 4 1-Methyl- 1.36E−04 1.92 0.63 Nicotinate and nicotinamide Nicotinamide Metabolism 5 Lactic acid 1.22E−02 1.51 1.18 Gluconeogenesis; Pyruvate Metabolism 6 Serotonin 1.92E−04 1.89 0.72 Tryptophan Metabolism 7 3-hydroxy- 2.80E−03 1.61 0.78 Lipid metabolism pathway decanoyl carnitine 8 3-hydroxy- 6.31E−03 1.44 0.81 Lipid metabolism pathway octanoyl carnitine 9 Hexanoyl- 3.05E−02 1.13 0.82 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 10 Octanoyl- 6.01E−03 1.43 0.72 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 11 Xanthine 7.55E−03 1.69 1.23 Purine Metabolism 12 Arabinosyl- 1.91E−07 2.69 0.41 N/A hypoxanthine 13 Inosine 5.44E−08 2.34 0.41 Purine Metabolism 14 Creatinine 4.65E−02 1.24 0.95 Arginine and proline metabolism 15 Ecgonine 2.25E−03 1.47 0.72 N/A 16 4-oxo- 2.22E−02 1.39 0.71 Retinol Metabolism Retinoic acid 17 Acetophenone 2.50E−02 1.22 0.56 N/A 18 7-Methyl- 2.43E−02 1.26 0.92 N/A guanine 19 2-Pyrrolidone 4.47E−02 1.08 1.13 N/A 20 Succinic acid 2.48E−02 1.31 1.28 Alanine, aspartate and semialdehyde glutamate metabolism; Butanoate metabolism 21 Cyclohexane- 2.87E−02 1.22 0.78 N/A acetic acid 22 Ethyl 3- 3.16E−02 1.15 0.81 N/A oxohexanoate 23 2-Ketobutyric 3.16E−02 1.28 1.27 Methionine Metabolism; acid Glycine and Serine Metabolism; Selenoamino Acid Metabolism 24 Homo-L- 3.33E−04 1.68 0.78 N/A arginine 25 5-Oxoproline 2.19E−06 2.24 1.24 Glutathione metabolism 26 Citrulline 2.07E−03 1.49 0.88 Arginine and Proline Metabolism; Aspartate Metabolism; Urea Cycle 27 Lysine 5.40E−03 1.31 0.90 Lysine Degradation; Biotin Metabolism 28 3- 8.73E−03 1.59 0.51 N/A Chlorotyrosine 29 Choline Sulfate 1.11E−03 1.55 0.74 N/A 30 Kynurenine 5.73E−04 1.62 0.71 Tryptophan Metabolism 31 2-Octenoyl- 2.47E−02 1.09 0.77 Lipid metabolism pathway carnitine 32 cis-5-Tetra- 1.39E−02 1.41 0.71 Lipid metabolism pathway decenoyl- carnitine 33 Phenylalanine 4.24E−02 1.14 1.15 Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis; Phenylalanine metabolism Note: FC in the table was the multiple ratio of the lung cancer samples to the samples with benign pulmonary nodules in men; and N/A indicated that no relevant metabolic pathway had been found.

[0156] It could be seen from comparison of Tables 2 and 3 that:

[0157] (1) The following metabolites had significant differences between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules and between patients with lung cancer and healthy people: alpha-Eleostearic acid, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 2-trans, 4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, 3-Chlorotyrosine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, Acetophenone, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Dihydroxybenzoic acid, Docosahexaenoic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Hexanoylcarnitine, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Lactic acid, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Pyruvic acid, Serotonin, Succinic acid semialdehyde, Xanthine;

[0158] (2) The following metabolites had significant differences between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules, but not between patients with lung cancer and healthy people: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-Pyrrolidone, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Acetylcarnitine, Bilirubin, Choline Sulfate, cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine, Citrulline, Creatinine, Diethylamine, Dihydrothymine, Glutamine, Hydroxybutyric acid, Inosine, Kynurenine, Linoleyl carnitine, Lysine, Trimethylamine N-oxide.

[0159] It could be seen from comparison of Tables 4 and 5 that:

[0160] (1) The following metabolites had significant differences both between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men and between patients with lung cancer and healthy people in men: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Acetylcarnitine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Diethylamine, Docosahexaenoic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Glutamine, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Inosine, Linoleyl carnitine, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Pyruvic acid, Trimethylamine N-oxide;

[0161] (2) The following metabolites had significant differences between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men, but not between patients with lung cancer and healthy people in men: 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Aminoadipic acid, Bilirubin, Dihydrothymine, Ergothioneine, Lactic acid, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Nicotine.

[0162] It could be seen from comparison of Tables 6 and 7 that:

[0163] (1) The following metabolites had significant differences both between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in women and between patients with lung cancer and healthy people in women: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-Ketobutyric acid, 2-Pyrrolidone, 3-Chlorotyrosine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Acetophenone, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Choline Sulfate, Citrulline, Creatinine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Hexanoylcarnitine, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Inosine, Lactic acid, Lysine, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Serotonin, Succinic acid semialdehyde, Trimethylamine N-oxide, Xanthine;

[0164] (2) The following metabolites had significant differences between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in women, but not between patients with lung cancer and healthy people in women: 2-Octenoylcarnitine, cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine, Kynurenine, Phenylalanine.

[0165] It could be seen from comparison of Tables 3, 5 and 7 that:

[0166] there were both common ones and different ones of the differential metabolites between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men and women. The differential metabolite that was common in the patients with lung cancer and the patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men and women, and differential metabolites specific to the patients with lung cancer and the patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men or women were shown in FIG. 6, wherein:

[0167] (1) The metabolite that was common between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men and women included: 1-Methylnicotinamide, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine, 4-oxo-Retinoic acid, 7-Methylguanine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Ecgonine, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Hippuric acid, Homo-L-arginine, Hypoxanthine, Inosine, Lactic acid, Octanoylcarnitine, 5-Oxoproline, Trimethylamine N-oxide;

[0168] (2) The metabolite that had significant differences between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men, but not in women, included: alpha-Eleostearic acid, 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine, Acetylcarnitine, Bilirubin, Diethylamine, Dihydrothymine, Docosahexaenoic acid, Glutamine, Linoleyl carnitine, N-Acetyl-L-alanine, Pyruvic acid, 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Aminoadipic acid, Ergothioneine, N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Nicotine;

[0169] (3) The metabolite that had significant differences between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in women, but not in men, included: 2-Ketobutyric acid, 2-Pyrrolidone, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Acetophenone, Choline Sulfate, cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine, Citrulline, Creatinine, Hexanoylcarnitine, Kynurenine, Lysine, Serotonin, Succinic acid semialdehyde, Xanthine, Phenylalanine.

[0170] It could be seen from comparison of Tables 2 to 7 that:

[0171] (1) the specific metabolite between patients with lung cancer and healthy people in men included: 3b,16a-Dihydroxyandrostenone sulfate, Isoleucine, Leucine, Tyrosine;

[0172] (2) the specific metabolite between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in men included: 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine, Aminoadipic acid, Ergothioneine, Nicotine;

[0173] (3) the specific metabolite between patients with lung cancer and healthy people in women included: Alanine, Asparagine, Propionylcarnitine, Urocanic acid;

[0174] (4) the specific metabolite between patients with lung cancer and patients with benign pulmonary nodules in women included: Phenylalanine. Here, the specific differential metabolite referred to that these differential metabolites only had significant differences between two specific groups, but not between other groups.

EXAMPLE 5

Model for Differential Diagnosis of Lung Cancer and Benign Pulmonary Nodules and Establishment Thereof

[0175] 1. The model for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules by a single differential metabolite and establishment thereof

[0176] An ROC curve of each metabolite was established, and the quality of the experimental results was judged by the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC of 0.5 indicated that the single metabolite had no diagnostic value; the AUC greater than 0.5 indicated that the single metabolite had a diagnostic value; and the diagnostic value of the single metabolite was higher when the AUC was larger.

[0177] The respective metabolites in Tables 3, 5 and 7 were analyzed by ROC curve, and the ROC values and related information of each metabolite were shown in Tables 8, 9 and 10, respectively:

TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 ROC values and related information of differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and samples with benign pulmonary nodules as obtained by ROC Analysis 95% confidence Cut-off No. Metabolites AUC interval Sensitivity Specificity value V01 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.568 0.508-0.642 0.6 0.5 1.130 V02 Succinic acid semialdehyde 0.568 0.506-0.632 0.6 0.5 1.210 V03 Acetophenone 0.617 0.546-0.677 0.7 0.6 0.993 V04 5-Oxoproline 0.736 0.682-0.786 0.6 0.7 1.030 V05 N-Acetyl-L-alanine 0.561 0.487-0.622 0.7 0.5 1.040 V06 Hypoxanthine 0.598 0.534-0.662 0.6 0.5 0.970 V07 Cyclohexaneacetic acid 0.676 0.617-0.736 0.7 0.6 0.971 V08 Xanthine 0.558 0.401-0.627 0.4 0.7 1.140 V09 Dihydroxybenzoic acid 0.640 0.573-0.695 0.6 0.6 0.666 V10 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate 0.671 0.612-0.738 0.6 0.7 0.764 V11 Hippuric acid 0.665 0.606-0.727 0.6 0.7 0.327 V12 3-Chlorotyrosine 0.636 0.584-0.699 0.6 0.6 0.417 V13 Arabinosylhypoxanthine 0.784 0.731-0.836 0.8 0.7 0.505 V14 Docosahexaenoic acid 0.683 0.621-0.738 0.7 0.7 0.952 V15 Pyruvic acid 0.578 0.514-0.637 0.6 0.6 1.220 V16 Lactic acid 0.599 0.534-0.667 0.6 0.5 1.010 V17 Hydroxybutyric acid 0.585 0.521-0.644 0.6 0.6 1.370 V18 Dihydrothymine 0.585 0.525-0.649 0.6 0.5 0.780 V19 Serotonin 0.641 0.583-0.704 0.6 0.6 0.933 V20 Ecgonine 0.710 0.651-0.769 0.7 0.7 0.783 V21 Homo-L-arginine 0.654 0.591-0.715 0.6 0.6 0.856 V22 Hexanoylcarnitine 0.604 0.545-0.674 0.7 0.5 0.997 V23 alpha-Eleostearic acid 0.667 0.605-0.723 0.6 0.7 0.843 V24 2-Octenoylcarnitine 0.651 0.594-0.708 0.7 0.6 1.040 V25 Octanoylcarnitine 0.656 0.594-0.718 0.7 0.6 0.856 V26 3-hydroxyoctanoylcarnitine 0.682 0.622-0.741 0.6 0.6 0.887 V27 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine 0.637 0.570-0.694 0.5 0.7 0.761 V28 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine 0.690 0.631-0.745 0.6 0.7 0.897 V29 3-hydroxydodecanoylcarnitine 0.658 0.593-0.719 0.6 0.7 0.793 V30 Creatinine 0.550 0.485-0.609 0.5 0.6 0.986 V31 1-Methylnicotinamide 0.660 0.598-0.724 0.5 0.7 0.839 V32 Glutamine 0.592 0.523-0.653 0.5 0.7 1.040 V33 Lysine 0.583 0.517-0.644 0.6 0.6 0.939 V34 7-Methylguanine 0.614 0.550-0.676 0.6 0.6 1.130 V35 Citrulline 0.568 0.504-0.629 0.5 0.7 0.994 V36 Choline Sulfate 0.661 0.593-0.720 0.7 0.6 0.739 V37 Acetyl carnitine 0.595 0.525-0.661 0.5 0.6 0.981 V38 Kynurenine 0.616 0.553-0.675 0.7 0.5 1.330 V39 Inosine 0.747 0.684-0.798 0.7 0.7 0.400 V40 4-oxo-Retinoic acid 0.621 0.557-0.684 0.7 0.5 1.090 V41 cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine 0.579 0.522-0.643 0.5 0.6 0.906 V42 Linoleylcarnitine 0.649 0.582-0.707 0.6 0.7 1.110 V43 Bilirubin 0.603 0.538-0.664 0.6 0.6 1.110 V44 Diethylamine 0.650 0.584-0.713 0.6 0.7 1.010 V45 Trimethylamine N-oxide 0.643 0.576-0.697 0.6 0.6 0.520 V46 2-Pyrrolidone 0.643 0.583-0.699 0.6 0.7 1.320

TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 ROC values and related information of differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and samples with benign pulmonary nodules in men as obtained by ROC Analysis 95% confidence Cut-off No. Metabolites AUC interval Sensitivity Specificity value MV01 Dihydrothymine 0.619 0.534-0.703 0.7 0.6 1.160 MV02 5-Oxoproline 0.643 0.558-0.734 0.6 0.6 1.030 MV03 N-Acetyl-L-alanine 0.598 0.494-0.684 0.5 0.6 1.140 MV04 Hypoxanthine 0.559 0.470-0.650 0.6 0.5 0.997 MV05 1-Methylnicotinamide 0.641 0.549-0.726 0.5 0.7 0.839 MV06 Cyclohexaneacetic acid 0.725 0.633-0.806 0.7 0.6 1.110 MV07 Glutamine 0.581 0.492-0.674 0.5 0.6 1.050 MV08 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate 0.752 0.670-0.829 0.6 0.8 0.792 MV09 Aminoadipic acid 0.564 0.472-0.659 0.6 0.6 1.180 MV10 Nicotine 0.672 0.584-0.750 0.7 0.6 0.950 MV11 7-Methylguanine 0.623 0.535-0.712 0.6 0.6 1.210 MV12 Hippuric acid 0.655 0.571-0.750 0.7 0.5 0.492 MV13 Ecgonine 0.774 0.699-0.843 0.8 0.7 0.781 MV14 Homo-L-arginine 0.650 0.562-0.730 0.6 0.7 0.856 MV15 N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine 0.702 0.617-0.782 0.7 0.7 1.040 MV16 Acetylcarnitine 0.662 0.572-0.743 0.5 0.7 0.911 MV17 Ergothioneine 0.648 0.550-0.731 0.5 0.7 0.622 MV18 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine 0.649 0.570-0.730 0.7 0.6 0.872 MV19 Arabinosylhypoxanthine 0.784 0.713-0.848 0.8 0.7 0.442 MV20 Inosine 0.716 0.631-0.801 0.7 0.7 0.325 MV21 alpha-Eleostearic acid 0.757 0.666-0.832 0.7 0.7 0.868 MV22 2-Octenoylcarnitine 0.687 0.599-0.773 0.7 0.6 1.050 MV23 Octanoylcarnitine 0.660 0.572-0.752 0.6 0.7 0.802 MV24 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine 0.738 0.656-0.808 0.7 0.7 0.994 MV25 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine 0.720 0.633-0.799 0.7 0.7 0.924 MV26 4-oxo-Retinoic acid 0.639 0.553-0.716 0.4 0.8 0.730 MV27 Docosahexaenoic acid 0.762 0.688-0.835 0.7 0.7 0.932 MV28 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine 0.728 0.639-0.797 0.6 0.7 0.975 MV29 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine 0.712 0.618-0.790 0.7 0.7 1.090 MV30 Linoleyl carnitine 0.867 0.807-0.922 0.8 0.9 1.210 MV31 Bilirubin 0.651 0.562-0.736 0.6 0.7 1.070 MV32 Diethylamine 0.663 0.570-0.759 0.6 0.8 0.986 MV33 Trimethylamine N-oxide 0.683 0.608-0.771 0.6 0.7 0.521 MV34 Pyruvic acid 0.602 0.509-0.690 0.7 0.5 1.240 MV35 Lactic acid 0.569 0.477-0.657 0.6 0.6 1.120

TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 ROC values and related information of differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and samples with benign pulmonary nodules in women as obtained by ROC Analysis 95% confidence Cut-off No. Metabolites AUC interval Sensitivity Specificity value FV01 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.614 0.528-0.705 0.6 0.5 1.070 FV02 Succinic acid semialdehyde 0.622 0.529-0.704 0.7 0.5 1.060 FV03 Creatinine 0.604 0.520-0.693 0.4 0.8 0.861 FV04 Acetophenone 0.630 0.541-0.720 0.8 0.5 0.899 FV05 5-Oxoproline 0.823 0.748-0.887 0.8 0.7 0.987 FV06 Hypoxanthine 0.646 0.558-0.727 0.6 0.6 0.970 FV07 1-Methylnicotinamide 0.679 0.592-0.758 0.6 0.7 0.931 FV08 Cyclohexaneacetic acid 0.630 0.539-0.721 0.6 0.6 0.849 FV09 Lysine 0.630 0.547-0.725 0.7 0.6 0.895 FV10 Xanthine 0.649 0.565-0.737 0.5 0.8 1.130 FV11 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate 0.616 0.513-0.702 0.5 0.7 0.632 FV12 7-Methylguanine 0.606 0.522-0.685 0.7 0.6 1.110 FV13 Phenylalanine 0.702 0.610-0.790 0.7 0.6 1.080 FV14 Citrulline 0.642 0.547-0.720 0.6 0.6 0.994 FV15 Serotonin 0.698 0.612-0.780 0.7 0.6 0.893 FV16 Hippuric acid 0.687 0.594-0.761 0.7 0.7 0.327 FV17 Choline Sulfate 0.674 0.594-0.758 0.7 0.6 0.713 FV18 Ecgonine 0.656 0.559-0.742 0.7 0.6 0.915 FV19 Homo-L-arginine 0.678 0.586-0.762 0.6 0.7 0.750 FV20 Kynurenine 0.660 0.567-0.746 0.8 0.5 1.310 FV21 3-Chlorotyrosine 0.653 0.566-0.740 0.6 0.7 0.297 FV22 Hexanoylcarnitine 0.595 0.507-0.682 0.7 0.5 0.997 FV23 Arabinosylhypoxanthine 0.798 0.724-0.865 0.7 0.8 0.540 FV24 Inosine 0.787 0.708-0.861 0.7 0.8 0.402 FV25 2-Octenoylcarnitine 0.618 0.534-0.708 0.6 0.7 0.794 FV26 Octanoylcarnitine 0.641 0.542-0.724 0.7 0.6 0.867 FV27 3-hydroxyoctanoylcarnitine 0.632 0.551-0.720 0.6 0.6 0.858 FV28 4-oxo-Retinoic acid 0.607 0.507-0.687 0.6 0.5 1.090 FV29 3-hydroxydecanoylcarnitine 0.654 0.564-0.737 0.6 0.6 0.798 FV30 cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine 0.615 0.534-0.708 0.5 0.6 0.910 FV31 Trimethylamine N-oxide 0.599 0.505-0.690 0.5 0.7 0.389 FV32 2-Pyrrolidone 0.611 0.523-0.712 0.6 0.6 1.160 FV33 Lactic acid 0.629 0.526-0.719 0.6 0.6 1.020

[0178] 2. The model for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules by a combination of multiple differential metabolites and establishment thereof

[0179] Based on the relative abundance of different metabolites between lung cancer and pulmonary nodules in Table 3, a model for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules was established by using binary logistic regression (SPSS software), and the forward maximum likelihood method (LR) was adopted to screen the optimum model parameters (SPSS software) for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and pulmonary nodules. As a result, a prediction model A (applicable to both men and women) was obtained.

[0180] The odds ratio (OR) referred to the ratio of occurrence and non-occurrence of lung cancer, which was an indicator of the correlation strength between lung cancer and a predictive variable. OR>1 indicated that with the increase of this variable, the probability of occurrence of lung cancer was increased, which was a “positive” correlation; OR<1 indicated that with the increase of this variable, the probability of occurrence of lung cancer was decreased, which was a “negative” correlation; and OR=1 indicated that there was no correlation between the disease and exposure. In logistic regression, the coefficient obtained by us was the logarithm of the OR value. p<0.05 in the table showed that this variable played a significant role in the model.

[0181] The variables and parameters of model A were listed in Table 11 below:

TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 List of variables and parameters of model A Model Odds co- Standard Significant ratio No. Model variable efficient error p (OR) / Constant 1.610 1.874 0.390 / V04 5-Oxoproline 5.553 1.364 4.70E−05 258.105 V05 N-Acetyl- 2.920 1.133 0.010 18.544 L-alanine V06 Hypoxanthine 2.713 0.806 0.001 15.080 V07 Cyclohexane- −0.332 0.134 0.013 0.718 acetic acid V10 Ethyl −1.798 0.456 8.00E−05 0.166 3-oxohexanoate V13 Arabinosyl- −7.922 1.881 2.50E−05 3.63E−04 hypoxanthine V14 Docosahexaenoic −0.593 0.204 0.004 0.553 acid V17 Hydroxybutyric 0.643 0.270 0.017 1.902 acid V19 Serotonin −2.187 0.537 0.000 0.112 V20 Ecgonine −0.992 0.425 0.019 0.371 V33 Lysine −2.352 0.980 0.016 0.095 V38 Kynurenine −1.441 0.380 1.50E−04 0.237 V39 Inosine 7.214 1.978 2.65E−04 1357.885 V40 4-oxo- −1.220 0.410 0.003 0.295 Retinoic acid V42 Linoleylcarnitine −1.235 0.334 2.19E−04 0.291

[0182] Finally, the resultant equation of model A was: Logit(P)=In[P/((1−P)]=5.553×V04+2.92×V05+2.713×V06−0.332×V07−1.798×V10−7.922×V13−0.593×V14+0.643×V17−2.187×V19−0.992×V20−2.352×V33−1.441×V38+7.214×V39−1.22×V40−1.235×V42+1.61, and the cut-off value of P was 0.424 (that is, when P>0.424, lung cancer was diagnosed). As shown in FIG. 7, ROC analysis was conducted, the AUC was 0.955, and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.913 and 0.876, respectively, indicating that the model A could be used for differential diagnosis of benign pulmonary nodules and malignant tumors.

[0183] Further, considering the gender factor, a model B for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and pulmonary nodules in men and a model C for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules in women were established according to Tables 5 and 7, respectively.

[0184] The variables and parameters of model B were listed in Table 12 below:

TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 List of variables and parameters of model B (men) Odds Model Model Standard Significant ratio No. variable coefficient error p (OR) / Constant 1.494 2.090 0.475 / MV02 5-Oxoproline 6.283 1.945 0.001 535.214 MV10 Nicotine −0.646 0.255 0.011 0.524 MV13 Ecgonine −2.758 0.800 0.001 0.063 MV15 N6,N6,N6- 1.864 0.822 0.023 6.453 Trimethylysine MV19 Arabinosyl- −1.126 0.582 0.053 0.324 hypoxanthine MV27 Docosa- −1.145 0.563 0.042 0.318 hexaenoic acid MV30 Linoleyl −3.918 0.844 3.48E−06 0.020 carnitine

[0185] The equation of model B was: Logit(P)=In[P/((1−P)]=6.283×MV02−0.646×MV10−2.758×MV13+1.864×MV15−1.126×MV19−1.145×MV27−3.918×MV30+1.494, wherein the cut-off value of P was 0.701, and when P>0.701, it indicated that a man with nodules was a patient with lung cancer. As shown in FIG. 8, ROC analysis was conducted, the AUC was 0.968, and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.870 and 0.988, respectively, indicating that the model B could be used for differential diagnosis of benign pulmonary nodules and malignant tumors in men.

[0186] The variables and parameters of model C were listed in Table 13 below:

TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 List of variables and parameters of model C (women) Model Model Standard Significant Odds ratio No. variable coefficient error p (OR) / Constant −6.905 3.466 0.046 / FV05 5-Oxoproline 10.742 2.599 3.57E−05 46244.867 FV08 Cyclo- −1.031 0.398 0.010 0.357 hexaneacetic acid FV09 Lysine −7.442 2.061 3.04E-04 0.001 FV13 Phenylalanine 11.839 2.959 6.31E−05 138602.684 FV15 Serotonin −2.617 0.994 0.008 0.073 FV20 Kynurenine −3.030 0.801 1.54E−04 0.048 FV23 Arabinosyl- −1.413 0.593 0.017 0.243 hypoxanthine FV29 3-hydroxy- −2.278 0.805 0.005 0.103 decanoyl carnitine

[0187] The equation of model C was: Logit(P)=In[P/((1−P)]=10.742×FV05−1.031×FV08−7.442×FV09+11.839×FV13−2.617×FV15−3.030×FV20−1.413×FV23−2.278×FV29−6.905, wherein the cut-off value of P was 0.629, and when P>0.629, it indicated that a woman with nodules was a patient with lung cancer. As shown in FIG. 9, ROC analysis was conducted, the AUC was 0.969, and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.870 and 0.953, respectively, indicating that the model C could be used for differential diagnosis of benign pulmonary nodules and malignant tumors in women.

[0188] 3. The model for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules by a combination of all differential metabolites and establishment thereof

[0189] Based on the relative abundance of the differential metabolite in lung cancer and pulmonary nodules from Table 3, a model D for differential diagnosis with all differential metabolites between lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules was established by using binary logistic regression (MetaboAnalyst software), and 10-fold Cross-Validation was adopted. The variables and parameters of model D were listed in Table 14 below:

TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 List of variables and parameters of model D Odds Model Standard Significant ratio No. Model variable coefficient error p (OR) / Constant 7.810 4.974 0.116 / V01 2-Ketobutyric acid −17.026 7.874 0.031 4.03E−08 V02 Succinic acid 17.418 8.036 0.030 3.67E+07 semialdehyde V03 Acetophenone 0.200 0.252 0.428 1.220 V04 5-Oxoproline 6.450 1.992 0.001 632.780 V05 N-Acetyl-L-alanine 1.479 1.732 0.393 4.390 V06 Hypoxanthine 3.762 1.445 0.009 43.040 V07 Cyclohexane- −0.337 0.198 0.088 0.710 acetic acid V08 Xanthine −0.096 1.072 0.929 0.910 V09 Dihydroxy- −0.681 0.372 0.067 0.510 benzoic acid V10 Ethyl −2.144 0.758 0.005 0.120 3-oxohexanoate V11 Hippuric acid 0.654 1.684 0.698 1.920 V12 3-Chlorotyrosine −0.833 1.558 0.593 0.430 V13 Arabinosyl- −10.388 3.203 0.001 3.08E−05 hypoxanthine V14 Docosahexaenoic −1.051 0.340 0.002 0.350 acid V15 Pyruvic acid −1.526 1.180 0.196 0.220 V16 Lactic acid 1.505 1.942 0.438 4.500 V17 Hydroxybutyric 1.806 1.027 0.079 6.090 acid V18 Dihydrothymine 0.519 0.454 0.253 1.680 V19 Serotonin −2.051 0.663 0.002 0.130 V20 Ecgonine −0.860 0.670 0.199 0.420 V21 Homo-L-arginine −0.552 0.783 0.481 0.580 V22 Hexanoylcarnitine −3.683 2.311 0.111 0.030 V23 alpha-Eleostearic 0.091 0.353 0.797 1.100 acid V24 2-Octenoylcarnitine −0.721 0.549 0.189 0.490 V25 Octanoylcarnitine 1.430 1.629 0.380 4.180 V26 3-hydroxy- 0.572 2.242 0.799 1.770 octanoylcarnitine V27 2-trans,4-cis- 1.466 0.990 0.139 4.330 Decadienoyl- carnitine V28 3-hydroxy- −1.097 2.424 0.651 0.330 decanoylcarnitine V29 3-hydroxy- 0.272 0.948 0.774 1.310 dodecanoyl- carnitine V30 Creatinine −0.315 2.478 0.899 0.730 V31 1-Methyl- −1.120 0.488 0.022 0.330 nicotinamide V32 Glutamine −2.830 2.480 0.254 0.060 V33 Lysine −2.850 1.577 0.071 0.060 V34 7-Methylguanine 0.993 1.908 0.603 2.700 V35 Citrulline 2.321 1.557 0.136 10.190 V36 Choline Sulfate −0.710 0.269 0.008 0.490 V37 Acetylcarnitine −0.616 1.516 0.685 0.540 V38 Kynurenine −1.711 0.573 0.003 0.180 V39 Inosine 9.051 3.429 0.008 8530.730 V40 4-oxo-Retinoic acid −1.520 0.527 0.004 0.220 V41 cis-5-Tetra- 0.302 0.773 0.696 1.350 decenoylcarnitine V42 Linoleylcarnitine −1.688 0.514 0.001 0.180 V43 Bilirubin −0.739 0.585 0.206 0.480 V44 Diethylamine −0.152 3.060 0.960 0.860 V45 Trimethylamine −0.282 0.591 0.634 0.750 N-oxide V46 2-Pyrrolidone −0.085 0.739 0.909 0.920

[0190] The equation of the model D was: Logit(P)=In[PA(1−P)]=−17.026×V01+17.418×V02+0.2×V03+6.45×V04+1.479×V05+3.762×V06−0.337×V07−0.096×V08−0.681×V09−2.144×V10+0.654×V11−0.833×V12−10.388×V13−1.051×V14−1.526×V15+1.505×V16+1.806×V17+0.519×V18−2.051×V19−0.86×V20−0.552×V21−3.683×V22+0.091×V23−0.721×V24+1.43×V25+0.572×V26+1.466×V27−1.097×V28+0.272×V29−0.315×V30−1.12×V31−2.83×V32−2.85×V33+0.993×V34+2.321×V35−0.71×V36−0.616×V37−1.711×V38+9.051×V39−1.52×V40+0.302×V41−1.688×V42−0.739×V43−0.152×V44−0.282×V45−0.085×V46+7.81, wherein the cut-off value of P was 0.21, ROC analysis was conducted and as shown in FIG. 10, the AUC was 0.973, and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.920 and 0.941, respectively, which indicated that the model could be used for differential diagnosis of benign pulmonary nodules and malignant tumors. According to the aforementioned screened differential metabolites (Tables 2 to 7), different differential metabolites could be selected to establish a variety of prediction models, all of which might have diagnostic values, and accordingly, the combination of differential metabolites screened out by them also had a diagnostic value.

EXAMPLE 6

Application of Model for Differential Diagnosis between Lung Cancer and Benign Pulmonary Nodules

[0191] We utilized Model A of Example 5 to predict 30 cases of lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules that were randomly selected inside and outside the hospital and not participating in establishment of the model. As shown in FIG. 11, the results showed that the prediction accuracy of model A for lung cancer reached 86.7%, and that for benign nodules reached 70%. The results showed that the model for differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules as established by us had higher sensitivity and specificity, and could effectively conduct differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules.

[0192] The results here were only preliminary prediction results. If the sample size was increased, the prediction results might be more accurate, but this did not deny that these markers found in the invention were biomarkers that could be used for diagnosing whether suffering from lung cancer.

[0193] Screening and Detection of Additional Novel Markers

EXAMPLE 7

Collection of Serum Samples

[0194] Serum samples were collected from patients of different genders and ages and healthy people. In this study, samples of people aged between 38-78 were collected, including three groups of serum samples from patients with lung cancer (136 cases), patients with benign pulmonary nodules (170 cases) and healthy people (174 cases).

EXAMPLE 8

Extraction of Serum Metabolites

[0195] Serum metabolites were extracted by a three-phase extraction method of methyl tert-butyl ether:methanol:water (10:3:2.5, v/v/v). The specific operation was as follows: (1) the serum sample was placed on ice and completely thawed, 50 uL of the sample was taken into a 1.5 mL EP tube, added with 225 μL of frozen methanol, and subjected to vortex for 30 seconds; (2) it was added with 750 μL of frozen MTBE, subjected to vortex for 30 seconds, and shaken on ice at 400 rpm for 1 hour; (3) it was then added with 188 μL of pure water and subjected to vortex for 1 minute; (4) it was centrifuged at 15,000 rcf for 10 minutes at 4° C.; and (5) upon centrifugation, 125 μL of the subnatant was taken into an EP tube and spin-dried with a vacuum freeze dryer, and all the dry samples of serum metabolites were stored in a refrigerator at −80° C. until testing.

[0196] Considering that there might be batch errors in sample pretreatment, in this study, processing of each batch of experimental samples was conducted simultaneously with the processing of one Reference serum for subsequent data correction. The Reference serum sample was prepared by mixing sera from 100 healthy people (healthy people referred to the people whose blood pressure, blood sugar and blood routine were all normal and that had no hepatitis B virus, and of which the physical examination results showed no obvious diseases, so that they did not need to see a doctor for treatment currently). The men and women from which the sera of 100 healthy people were derived were of the equal number, and were aged between 40-55. The subjects needed to fast overnight and forbid taking drugs 72 hours before blood collection, and individuals with past disease history and body mass indexes (BM's) outside the 95th percentile were excluded. The mixed serum was sub-packaged in 50 μL per portion and stored in a refrigerator at −80° C.

EXAMPLE 9

Detection of Extracted Serum Metabolites and Data Preprocessing

[0197] (1) Reconstitution of serum metabolites: the dry extract of serum metabolites was added with 120 μL of a reconstitution solvent (acetonitrile: water=4:1), subjected to vortex for 5 minutes, and then centrifuges at 4° C. for 15,000×g for 10 minutes, and 100 μL of the supernatant was taken into a liner tube to prepare a sample to be tested.

[0198] (2) QC sample: each 10 μL of the serum samples to be tested from patients with lung cancer, patients with benign pulmonary nodules and healthy people was taken, subjected to vortex, and mixed evenly with shaking to prepare a QC sample.

[0199] (3) Sample detection method: detection was conducted with liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS).

[0200] I. Liquid Chromatography Conditions

[0201] Chromatographic Column: BEH Amide (100×2.1 mm, 1.7 μm).

[0202] Mobile phase: in positive mode, phase A was acetonitrile; water=95:5 (10 mM ammonium acetate, 0.1% formic acid), and phase B was acetonitrile: water=50:50 (10 mM ammonium acetate, 0.1% formic acid); and in negative mode, phase A was acetonitrile: water=95:5 (10 mM ammonium acetate, pH =9.0, adjusted by aqueous ammonia), and phase B was acetonitrile: water=50:50 (10 mM ammonium acetate, pH=9.0, adjusted by aqueous ammonia).

[0203] The elution gradient was shown in the table below:

TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Elution gradient of LC-HRMS mobile phase Time (min) Flow rate (mL/min) Phase A Phase B 0.0 0.30 98 2 0.50 0.30 98 2 12.0 0.30 50 50 14.0 0.30 2 98 16.0 0.30 2 98 16.1 0.30 98 2 20.0 0.30 98 2

[0204] II. Mass Spectrometry Conditions

[0205] The model of a mass spectrometer was Q Exactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific Company, USA), and qualitative analysis was carried out by employing an electrospray ion source (ESI), a positive and negative Fullscan mode (Full Scan) and a data dependent scan mode (ddMS2). The spray voltage was +3,800/−3,200 V; the atomization temperature was 350° C.; high-purity nitrogen was used as sheath gas and auxiliary gas, and the parameters were set to 40 arb and 10 arb; respectively; the temperature of ion transfer tube was 320° C.; the mass scanning range was 70-1,050 m/z; the primary scan resolution was 70,000 FWHM, and the secondary scan resolution was 35,000 FWHM.

[0206] III. Injecting Method

[0207] Before each detection, six syringe volumes of the QC sample were injected to stabilize the detection system. The serum sample was injected in a random manner, in which testing of one syringe volume of the QC sample was inserted every injection of 10 syringe volumes of the serum samples. The first syringe and last syringe in the detection sequence were both the QC sample. Finally, the QC sample was subjected to full scanning and segmented scanning by ddMS2 for compound identification.

[0208] (4) Data Preprocessing

[0209] I. Raw Data Matrix

[0210] The raw data of each sample included total ion current data and mass spectrum data (as shown in FIG. 2). All the raw data of the sample was imported into Compound Discovery software to get the information of m/z ions and retention time, and the database (mzCloud and Chemspider) was searched to get the identification results of the compound. Further, according to the information of m/z ions and retention time, the chromatographic integration of each sample was carried out by using Tracefinder software, so as to obtain more accurate peak area information. Finally, a two-dimensional data matrix containing characteristic ions (a combination of m/z ions and retention time) and contents thereof (peak area) was obtained for each sample.

[0211] II. Excision and Interpolation of Data Missing Values

[0212] There were often data missing values in the original data matrix of metabonomics, which were mainly related to the detection of background noise, peak extraction and peak alignment methods of mass spectrometry, etc. Too many zero or missing values would bring difficulties to downstream analysis. Therefore, characteristic ions with missing values greater than 50% in all samples were generally excised, and the missing values of other compounds were interpolated. In this study, MetaboAnalyst 5.0 analysis software was used for processing the missing values, and 1/5 of the minimum value was selected for interpolation.

[0213] III. Data Correction and Filtering

[0214] A large amount of sample pretreatment was inevitably limited by the throughput of experimental treatment, so it was necessary to carry out sample pretreatment in batches. However, due to the multifarious types of metabolites, large differences in physical and chemical properties, and expensive isotope internal standards, it was difficult to choose an appropriate isotope internal standard that could meet the full coverage. Aiming at this problem, this study selected a reference serum that is processed simultaneously with the batch processing as a natural “like internal standard” to correct batch errors caused by pretreatment. That was, the original data of the experimental samples of each pretreatment batch was normalized based on the data of the Reference serum of the corresponding batch to obtain the relative abundance of each characteristic ion, and the characteristic ion with RSD>30% in the QC sample was deleted to obtain the final analysis data matrix.

EXAMPLE 10

Samples were Grouped by Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis, and Differential Metabolites of Different Groups Were Screened According to Fold Change and Significance Analysis

[0215] Metabonomics generally adopted the combination of univariate analysis and multivariate statistical analysis to screen differential metabolites, in which the univariate analysis mainly included significance analysis (p value or FDR value) and Fold change of characteristic ions in different groups, while the multivariate statistical analysis mainly included principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Before statistical analysis, the data should be properly normalized, transformed and scaled. In this study, MetaboAnalyst 5.0 analysis software was used for statistical analysis, and data normalization by the sum, Log transformation and Auto scaling were carried out. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed on the three groups of lung cancer, benign pulmonary nodules and healthy people (as shown in FIG. 12), and obvious grouping results were obtained.

[0216] According to the screening criteria of the differential metabolite: (1) Fold change>1.2 or <0.83; (2) when FDR<0.05, i.e. Fold change>1.2 or <0.83 and FDR<0.05, it was judged that there was a significant difference in the metabolite between the two groups, and the metabolite was the differential metabolite between the two groups.

[0217] It should be noted that when using the method of serum metabolomics to screen differential metabolites, the screened differential metabolites would be affected by many factors, including: the sample size, such as differences in sample sizes and sources of the patients with lung cancer, the patients with benign pulmonary nodules and healthy people in this application, and the like, which each could affect the final results; sample treatment methods, wherein for example different substances would be obtained by using different extraction solvents, which would also lead to different detection results; liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry conditions, wherein the compounds detected under different liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry conditions were different; and data analysis methods, wherein differential metabolites obtained by employing different statistical analysis methods would also be different. Furthermore, the effect of the combination of these influencing factors would be more complicated, so it was impossible to predict the results of the final screened differential metabolites. Particularly, in the method of screening lung cancer biomarkers based on serum metabonomics in the present application, the missing value was processed by using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 analysis software, and 1/5 of the minimum value was selected for interpolation. Under the aforementioned screening criteria, even if the number of samples was further increased on the basis of the existing sample size, the obtained differential metabolites hardly changed, which indicated that the screening method in the present application was relatively stable and the obtained differential metabolites had high representativeness. The main differential metabolites found in the present application were shown in the table below.

TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Differential metabolites between patients with lung cancer (LA) and healthy people (HC), and between patients with lung cancer (LA) and patients with benign pulmonary nodules (BN). LA vs HC LA vs BN No. Name Class FC FDR FC FDR 1 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine Acyl carnitine 0.59 1.07E−13 0.74 4.15E−05 2 Octanoylcarnitine Acyl carnitine 0.62 3.97E−10 0.75 4.03E−06 3 Decanoylcarnitine Acyl carnitine 0.62 2.00E−09 0.73 6.74E−06 4 2-Octenoylcarnitine Acyl carnitine 0.69 3.22E−05 0.69 8.57E−06 5 Hexanoylcarnitine Acyl carnitine 0.69 2.95E−07 0.82 3.89E−04 6 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine Acyl carnitine 0.62 3.60E−11 0.6 1.24E−07 7 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine Acyl carnitine 0.68 5.10E−12 0.66 1.79E−09 8 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine Acyl carnitine 0.72 5.67E−10 0.69 3.80E−09 9 Ecgonine Alkaloid 0.67 1.92E−09 0.66 1.66E−08 10 Trimethylamine N-oxide Amine 0.52 4.92E−09 0.69 7.48E−06 11 1-Methylnicotinamide Amine 0.7 3.46E−10 0.67 1.05E−07 12 3-Chlorotyrosine Amino acid 0.46 1.09E−08 0.6 2.89E−06 13 Homo-L-arginine Amino acid 0.74 1.18E−07 0.76 1.93E−06 14 Serotonin Amino acid 0.81 3.00E−04 0.83 9.96E−04 15 Alanine Amino acid 1.23 8.28E−06 1.24 6.18E−06 16 alpha-Eleostearic acid Fatty acid 0.7 2.52E−09 0.71 1.06E−06 17 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate Fatty acid 0.8 1.37E−05 0.78 2.51E−05 18 Inosine Nucleoside 0.41 4.34E−12 0.38 4.34E−12 19 Arabinosylhypoxanthine Nucleoside 0.47 5.51E−11 0.41 4.34E−11 20 Hippuric acid Organic acid 0.52 9.60E−09 0.64 1.93E−06 21 Cyclohexaneacetic acid Organic acid 0.76 2.38E−03 0.8 7.30E−05 22 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate Organic acid 1.24 2.23E−07 1.3 3.59E−10 23 2-Ketobutyric acid Organic acid 1.37 9.01E−04 1.35 2.17E−03 24 Pyruvic acid Organic acid 1.44 7.14E−08 1.39 3.43E−06 25 Hypoxanthine Purine 1.27 1.82E−09 1.28 1.79E−09 26 Xanthine Purine 1.28 3.08E−07 1.28 2.77E−06 27 N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine Amino acid 0.81 2.73E−04 / / 28 Kynurenine Amino acid / / 0.78 4.10E−05 29 cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine Acyl carnitine / / 0.77 4.87E−04 30 Docosahexaenoic acid Fatty acid / / 0.78 1.50E−05 31 Choline Sulfate Organic acid / / 0.72 7.65E−07 32 Dihydrothymine Pyrimidine / / 1.3 1.62E−03 33 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate Sulfated steroid / / 1.22 6.73E−03 34 Pregnenolone sulfate Sulfated steroid / / 1.47 2.93E−02 35 Tiglylcarnitine Acyl carnitine 0.82 1.56E−04 / / 36 Propionylcarnitine Acyl carnitine 0.82 3.99E−07 / / 37 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine Acyl carnitine 0.78 2.16E−04 / / 38 Oxindole Alkaloid 0.8 1.97E−03 / / 39 Nicotine Alkaloid 0.83 9.43E−03 / / 40 Ergothioneine Amino acid 0.79 9.12E−04 / / 41 Phenylacetylglutamine Amino acid 0.8 2.65E−02 / / 42 Citrulline Amino acid 0.83 3.53E−08 / / 43 Lysine Amino acid 0.83 6.90E−10 / / 44 Aminocaproic acid Fatty acid 1.29 4.71E−03 / / 45 Methylimidazoleacetic acid Organic acid 0.82 1.85E−02 / /

[0218] It could be seen from the data in the table that:

[0219] (1) The metabolites that had significant differences both between the lung cancer group and the healthy (without nodules) group and between the lung cancer group and the group with benign pulmonary nodules included: 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine, Octanoylcarnitine, Decanoylcarnitine, 2-Octenoylcarnitine, Hexanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydodecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxydecanoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxyoctanoylcarnitine, Ecgonine, Trimethylamine N-oxide, 1-Methylnicotinamide, 3-Chlorotyrosine, Homo-L-arginine, Serotonin, Alanine, alpha-Eleostearic acid, Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate, Inosine, Arabinosylhypoxanthine, Hippuric acid, Cyclohexaneacetic acid, Lactic acid, 2-Ketobutyric acid, Pyruvic acid, Hypoxanthine, Xanthine.

[0220] (2) The metabolites that had significant differences only between the lung cancer group and the healthy (without nodules) group, but not between the lung cancer group and the group with benign pulmonary nodules included: N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine, Tiglylcarnitine, Propionylcarnitine, 3-hydroxybutyrylcarnitine, Oxindole, Nicotine, Ergothioneine, Phenylacetylglutamine, Citrulline, Lysine, Aminocaproic acid, Methylimidazoleacetic acid.

[0221] (3) The metabolites that had significant differences only between the lung cancer group and the group with benign pulmonary nodules, but not between the lung cancer group and the healthy (without nodules) group included: Kynurenine, cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine, Docosahexaenoic acid, Choline Sulfate, Dihydrothymine, 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate, Pregnenolone sulfate.

[0222] (4) The differential metabolites in the table were classified into types of acyl carnitine, amines, alkaloids, fatty acids, amino acids, etc., which indicated that these types of serum metabolites were highly likely to be related to lung cancer. Moreover, the related metabolic pathways of the differential metabolites in the table and other metabolites in the pathways were also highly likely to be related to lung cancer, so they could be given priority in consideration during the process of finding biomarkers of lung cancer.

EXAMPLE 11

Model for Differential Diagnosis of Lung Cancer and Benign Pulmonary Nodules and Establishment thereof

[0223] 1. The model for differential diagnosis between lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules or between patients with lung cancer and healthy people by a single differential metabolite and establishment thereof

[0224] An ROC curve of each differential metabolite was established, and the quality of the experimental results was judged by the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC less than or equal to 0.5 indicated that the single differential metabolite had no diagnostic value; the AUC greater than 0.5 indicated that the single differential metabolite had a diagnostic value; and the diagnostic value of the single differential metabolite was higher when the AUC was larger.

[0225] The respective differential metabolites in Table 16 were analyzed by ROC curve, and the ROC values and related information of them were shown in Tables 17 and 18, respectively:

TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 ROC values and related information of differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and healthy (without nodules) samples as obtained by ROC Analysis 95% confidence Cut-off No. Metabolites AUC interval Sensitivity Specificity value 1 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine 0.746 0.698-0.797 0.5 0.8 1.160 2 Octanoylcarnitine 0.692 0.631-0.756 0.7 0.6 0.745 3 Decanoylcarnitine 0.688 0.622-0.750 0.6 0.7 0.880 4 2-Octenoylcarnitine 0.627 0.560-0.683 0.5 0.7 1.100 5 Hexanoylcarnitine 0.660 0.596-0.718 0.7 0.5 0.853 6 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine 0.713 0.651-0.771 0.8 0.6 0.749 7 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine 0.718 0.657-0.771 0.6 0.7 0.975 8 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine 0.692 0.634-0.748 0.5 0.8 1.050 9 Ecgonine 0.687 0.629-0.744 0.8 0.5 0.664 10 Trimethylamine N-oxide 0.682 0.624-0.742 0.9 0.4 0.327 11 1-Methylnicotinamide 0.681 0.617-0.735 0.9 0.4 0.688 12 3-Chlorotyrosine 0.708 0.649-0.757 0.8 0.5 0.127 13 Homo-L-arginine 0.645 0.585-0.712 0.6 0.7 0.920 14 Serotonin 0.581 0.521-0.643 0.5 0.6 0.977 15 Alanine 0.591 0.527-0.657 0.5 0.7 1.170 16 alpha-Eleostearic acid 0.687 0.620-0.743 0.6 0.8 1.010 17 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate 0.686 0.626-0.743 0.8 0.5 0.683 18 Inosine 0.733 0.677-0.786 0.7 0.7 0.405 19 Arabinosylhypoxanthine 0.748 0.697-0.800 0.8 0.7 0.408 20 Hippuric acid 0.711 0.650-0.770 0.8 0.6 0.205 21 Cyclohexaneacetic acid 0.629 0.568-0.691 0.6 0.6 0.876 22 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate 0.609 0.541-0.674 0.5 0.7 0.993 23 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.585 0.525-0.640 0.3 0.9 0.747 24 Pyruvic acid 0.640 0.576-0.702 0.4 0.8 0.968 25 Hypoxanthine 0.630 0.578-0.687 0.6 0.6 1.010 26 Xanthine 0.604 0.538-0.659 0.8 0.4 1.230 27 N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine 0.585 0.525-0.649 0.7 0.5 0.889 28 Tiglylcarnitine 0.594 0.531-0.652 0.8 0.4 0.808 29 Propionylcarnitine 0.612 0.558-0.675 0.9 0.3 0.789 30 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine 0.606 0.533-0.673 0.6 0.6 0.872 31 Oxindole 0.578 0.518-0.640 0.5 0.7 1.030 32 Nicotine 0.545 0.483-0.608 0.6 0.5 0.792 33 Ergothioneine 0.598 0.534-0.665 0.9 0.3 0.448 34 Phenylacetylglutamine 0.556 0.494-0.620 0.9 0.2 0.279 35 Citrulline 0.616 0.550-0.686 0.7 0.6 0.968 36 Lysine 0.646 0.582-0.702 0.6 0.7 1.020 37 Aminocaproic acid 0.612 0.548-0.671 0.5 0.8 0.369 38 Methylimidazoleacetic acid 0.556 0.493-0.623 0.6 0.5 0.723

TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 ROC values and related information of differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and samples with benign pulmonary nodules as obtained by ROC Analysis 95% confidence Cut-off No. Metabolites AUC interval Sensitivity Specificity value 1 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine 0.652 0.592-0.708 0.7 0.5 0.761 2 Octanoylcarnitine 0.670 0.605-0.722 0.7 0.6 0.761 3 Decanoylcarnitine 0.657 0.591-0.718 0.7 0.6 0.692 4 2-Octenoylcarnitine 0.648 0.586-0.700 0.6 0.7 1.070 5 Hexanoylcarnitine 0.623 0.554-0.683 0.9 0.3 0.661 6 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine 0.682 0.621-0.735 0.8 0.5 0.674 7 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine 0.711 0.641-0.767 0.7 0.6 0.834 8 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine 0.700 0.641-0.761 0.7 0.6 0.826 9 Ecgonine 0.701 0.642-0.751 0.6 0.8 0.905 10 Trimethylamine N-oxide 0.651 0.586-0.710 0.8 0.4 0.344 11 1-Methylnicotinamide 0.674 0.607-0.731 0.7 0.5 0.828 12 3-Chlorotyrosine 0.683 0.623-0.747 0.8 0.6 0.145 13 Homo-L-arginine 0.654 0.597-0.708 0.6 0.7 0.919 14 Serotonin 0.597 0.529-0.658 0.9 0.2 0.526 15 Alanine 0.567 0.497-0.628 0.5 0.6 1.240 16 alpha-Eleostearic acid 0.674 0.614-0.731 0.6 0.7 0.965 17 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate 0.687 0.629-0.746 0.5 0.7 0.935 18 Inosine 0.746 0.693-0.794 0.7 0.7 0.400 19 Arabinosylhypoxanthine 0.766 0.710-0.819 0.7 0.7 0.505 20 Hippuric acid 0.692 0.629-0.754 0.8 0.5 0.206 21 Cyclohexaneacetic acid 0.671 0.603-0.723 0.5 0.8 1.160 22 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate 0.627 0.560-0.638 0.8 0.4 1.270 23 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.561 0.493-0.626 0.9 0.2 2.140 24 Pyruvic acid 0.600 0.537-0.663 0.6 0.6 1.220 25 Hypoxanthine 0.611 0.541-0.670 0.6 0.6 0.970 26 Xanthine 0.566 0.502-0.621 0.7 0.4 1.190 27 Kynurenine 0.624 0.558-0.688 0.5 0.7 1.330 28 cis-5-Tetradecenoylcarnitine 0.617 0.546-0.676 0.8 0.4 0.752 29 Docosahexaenoic acid 0.693 0.635-0.754 0.7 0.6 0.932 30 Choline Sulfate 0.666 0.608-0.730 0.6 0.7 0.762 31 Dihydrothymine 0.565 0.496-0.630 0.7 0.4 1.140 32 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate 0.533 0.468-0.599 0.7 0.4 0.999 33 Pregnenolone sulfate 0.530 0.470-0.592 0.3 0.8 0.536

[0226] The ROC values of the differential metabolites between lung cancer samples and healthy (without nodules) samples in Table 3 were all equal to and greater than 0.5, indicating that these differential metabolites had a certain value for distinguishing the lung cancer samples from the healthy (without nodules) samples, and could be used as biomarkers for the auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer. The higher AUC value in the table indicated the higher diagnostic value of the single biomarker, and the greater value or reference significance of it that might be obtained when it was used for diagnosis alone or in combination with multiple biomarkers. Meanwhile, for biomarkers with relatively small AUC values, their diagnostic or identifying significance cannot be denied, and use of single ones of them also provided a possibility or reference to a certain extent. Moreover, when multiple biomarkers with relatively small AUC values were combined together, the value of combined diagnosis was often higher, even reaching the accuracy of 80%, 90% and above. Therefore, any biomarker in Table 17 had more or less significance in distinguishing the lung cancer samples from the health (without nodules) samples or auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer. Similarly, the biomarkers in Table 18 had the same value or significance for the diagnosis or identification of benign pulmonary nodules and lung cancer.

[0227] 2. The model for identifying lung cancer samples and healthy (without nodules) samples or samples with benign pulmonary nodules by a combination of multiple differential metabolites and establishment thereof

[0228] Based on the serum detection values of differential metabolites in the lung cancer samples and the samples with pulmonary nodules in Table 15, a model for differential diagnosis between the lung cancer samples and the healthy (without nodules) samples or between the lung cancer samples and the samples with benign pulmonary nodules was established by utilizing binary logistic regression (LASSO algorithm, R language). The models for distinguishing lung cancer from benign pulmonary nodules included model A, model B, model C and model D. The models for distinguishing individuals with lung cancer from healthy individuals included: model E, model F, model G, model H and model I.

[0229] I. The variables and parameters of model A were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 19 List of variables and parameters of model A No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio M1 Hypoxanthine 2.29 9.87 M2 Alanine 1.02 2.77 M3 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.64 1.90 M4 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine 0.62 1.86 M5 Xanthine 0.47 1.60 M6 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate 0.42 1.52 M7 Dihydrothymine 0.38 1.46 M8 Octanoylcarnitine 0.26 1.30 M9 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate 0.05 1.05 M10 Pregnenolone sulfate 0.03 1.03 M11 3-Chlorotyrosine −0.05 0.95 M12 Cyclohexaneacetic acid −0.12 0.89 M13 Choline Sulfate −0.16 0.85 M14 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.17 0.84 M15 2-Octenoylcarnitine −0.36 0.70 M16 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.40 0.67 M17 Serotonin −0.45 0.64 M18 Docosahexaenoic acid −0.46 0.63 M19 Decanoylcarnitine −0.47 0.63 M20 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.53 0.59 M21 Homo-L-arginine −0.55 0.58 M22 Pyruvic acid −0.79 0.45 M23 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.95 0.39 M24 Ecgonine −1.02 0.36 M25 Kynurenine −1.19 0.30 M26 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −1.52 0.22 M27 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −1.88 0.15 constant 4.01 /

[0230] The equation of model A was: In[P/(1−P)]=2.29×M1+1.02×M2+0.64×M3+0.62×M4+0.47×M5+0.42×M6+0.38×M7+0.26×M8+0.05×M9+0.03×M10−0.05×M11−0.12×M12−0.16×M13−0.17×M14−0.36×M15−0.4×M16−0.45×M17−0.46×M18−0.47×M19−0.53×M20−0.55×M21−0.79×M22−0.95×M23−1.02×M24−1.19×M25−1.52 ×M26−1.88×M27+4.01.

[0231] The cut-off value of P was 0.455. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model A for calculation. When P>0.455, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.455, it was identified as benign pulmonary nodules.

[0232] As shown in FIG. 13, ROC analysis was conducted, and the model A had a AUC of 0.933, and specificity and sensitivity of 0.859 and 0.868 respectively.

[0233] II. The variables and parameters of model B were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 20 List of variables and parameters of model B No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio M1 Hypoxanthine 1.11 3.03 M2 Alanine 0.25 1.28 M3 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.13 1.14 M4 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate 0.09 1.09 M5 Dihydrothymine 0.05 1.05 M6 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.01 0.99 M7 Serotonin −0.02 0.98 M8 3-Chlorotyrosine −0.02 0.98 M9 Hippuric acid −0.04 0.96 M10 Docosahexaenoic acid −0.11 0.90 M11 2-Octenoylcarnitine −0.12 0.89 M12 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.19 0.83 M13 Homo-L-arginine −0.30 0.74 M14 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.34 0.71 M15 Kynurenine −0.45 0.64 M16 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.46 0.63 M17 Ecgonine −0.64 0.53 M18 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −0.68 0.51 M19 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −0.95 0.39 constant 2.17 /

[0234] The equation of model B was: In[P/(1−P)]=1.11×M1+0.25×M2+0.13×M3+0.09×M4 +0.05×M5−0.01×M6−0.02×M7−0.02×M8−0.04×M9−0.11×M10−0.12×M11−0.19×M12−0.3×M13−0.34×M14−0.45×M15−0.46×M16−0.64×M17−0.68×M18−0.95×M19+2.17.

[0235] The cut-off value of P was 0.511. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model B for calculation. When P>0.511, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.511, it was identified as benign pulmonary nodules. ROC analysis was conducted (as shown in FIG. 14), and the model C had a AUC of 0.915, and specificity and sensitivity of 0.871 and 0.801 respectively.

[0236] III. The variables and parameters of model C were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 21 List of variables and parameters of model C No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio M1 Hypoxanthine 1.73 5.64 M2 Alanine 0.72 2.05 M3 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.31 1.36 M4 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate 0.29 1.34 M5 Dihydrothymine 0.23 1.26 M6 Xanthine 0.15 1.16 M7 3-Chlorotyrosine −0.05 0.95 M8 Cyclohexaneacetic acid −0.07 0.93 M9 Choline Sulfate −0.07 0.93 M10 Decanoylcarnitine −0.09 0.91 M11 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.09 0.91 M12 2-Octenoylcarnitine −0.16 0.85 M13 PyruMic acid −0.26 0.77 M14 Docosahexaenoic acid −0.26 0.77 M15 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.27 0.76 M16 Serotonin −0.29 0.75 M17 Homo-L-arginine −0.43 0.65 M18 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.45 0.64 M19 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.56 0.57 M20 Ecgonine −0.75 0.47 M21 Kynurenine −0.87 0.42 M22 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −1.15 0.32 M23 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −1.41 0.24 constant 3.07 /

[0237] The equation of model C was: In[P/(1−P)]=1.73×M1+0.72×M2+0.31×M3+0.29×M4+0.23×M5+0.15×M6−0.05×M7−0.07×M8−0.07×M9−0.09×M10−0.09×M11−0.16×M12−0.26×M13−0.26×M14−0.27×M15−0.29×M16−0.43×M17−0.45×M18−0.56×M19−0.75×M20−0.87×M21−1.15×M22−1.41×M23+3.07.

[0238] The cut-off value of P was 0.452. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model C for calculation. When P>0.452, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.452, it was identified as benign pulmonary nodules. ROC analysis was conducted (as shown in FIG. 15), and the model C had a AUC of 0.926, and specificity and sensitivity of 0.841 and 0.868 respectively.

[0239] IV. The variables and parameters of model D were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 22 List of variables and parameters of model D No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio M1 Hypoxanthine 2.35 10.49 M2 Alanine 1.03 2.80 M3 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.71 2.03 M4 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine 0.68 1.97 M5 Xanthine 0.48 1.62 M6 Octanoylcarnitine 0.45 1.57 M7 17-Hydroxypregnenolone sulfate 0.42 1.52 M8 Dihydrothymine 0.39 1.48 M9 Lactic acid 0.16 1.17 M10 Pregnenolone sulfate 0.03 1.03 M11 3-Chlorotyrosine −0.05 0.95 M12 Cyclohexaneacetic acid −0.12 0.89 M13 Choline Sulfate −0.17 0.84 M14 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.17 0.84 M15 Hexanoylcarnitine −0.22 0.80 M16 2-Octenoylcarnitine −0.39 0.68 M17 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.43 0.65 M18 Serotonin −0.46 0.63 M19 Docosahexaenoic acid −0.49 0.61 M20 Decanoylcarnitine −0.54 0.58 M21 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.54 0.58 M22 Homo-L-arginine −0.57 0.57 M23 Pyruvic acid −0.89 0.41 M24 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.97 0.38 M25 Ecgonine −1.07 0.34 M26 Kynurenine −1.23 0.29 M27 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −1.56 0.21 M28 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −1.93 0.15 constant 4.16 /

[0240] The equation of model D was: In[P/(1−P)]=2.35×M1+1.03×M2+0.71×M3+0.68×M4+0.48×M5+0.45×M6+0.42×M7+0.39×M8+0.16×M9+0.03×M10−0.05×M11−0.12×M12−0.17×M13−0.17×M14−0.22×M15−0.39×M16−0.43×M17−0.46×M18−0.49×M19−0.54×M20−0.54×M21−0.57×M22−0.89×M23−0.97×M24−1.07×M25−1.23×M26−1.56×M27−1.93×M28+4.16.

[0241] The cut-off value of P was 0.458. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model D for calculation. When P>0.458, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.458, it was identified as benign pulmonary nodules. ROC analysis was conducted (as shown in FIG. 16), and the model D had a AUC of 0.933, and specificity and sensitivity of 0.859 and 0.860 respectively.

[0242] V. The variables and parameters of model E were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 23 List of variables and parameters of model E No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio V1 Hypoxanthine 1.41 4.10 V2 Alanine 0.26 1.30 V3 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.04 1.04 V4 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine −0.01 0.99 V5 Nicotine −0.05 0.95 V6 Hippuric acid −0.09 0.91 V7 Citrulline −0.19 0.83 V8 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.20 0.82 V9 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.32 0.73 V10 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.34 0.71 V11 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.40 0.67 V12 Ecgonine −0.48 0.62 V13 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −0.55 0.58 V14 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine −0.64 0.53 V15 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −1.07 0.34 V16 Lysine −1.58 0.21 constant 3.44 /

[0243] The equation of model E was: In[P/(1−P)]=In[P/(1−P)]=1.41×V1+0.26×V2+0.04×V3−0.01×V4−0.05×V5−0.09×V6−0.19×V7−0.2×V8−0.32×V9−0.34×V10−0.4×V11−0.48×V12−0.55×V13−0.64×V14−1.07×V15−1.58×V16+3.44.

[0244] The cut-off value of P was 0.520. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model E for calculation. When P>0.520, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.520, it was identified as healthy people.

[0245] As shown in FIG. 17, ROC analysis was conducted on the samples of model E, the AUC was 0.902, and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.801 and 0.856, respectively, indicating that the model E had high accuracy in distinguishing individuals with lung malignant tumors from healthy individuals.

[0246] VI. The variables and parameters of model F were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00024 TABLE 24 List of variables and parameters of model F No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio V1 Hypoxanthine 1.51 4.53 V2 Alanine 0.29 1.34 V3 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.06 1.06 V4 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine −0.03 0.97 V5 Decanoylcarnitine −0.03 0.97 V6 Ergothioneine −0.03 0.97 V7 Nicotine −0.07 0.93 V8 Hippuric acid −0.10 0.90 V9 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.21 0.81 V10 Citrulline −0.22 0.80 V11 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.33 0.72 V12 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.35 0.70 V13 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.39 0.68 V14 Ecgonine −0.51 0.60 V15 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −0.59 0.55 V16 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine −0.63 0.53 V17 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −1.12 0.33 V18 Lysine −1.69 0.18 constant 3.65 /

[0247] The equation of model F was: In[P/(1−P)]=1.51×V1+0.29×V2+0.06×V3−0.03×V4−0.03×V5−0.03×V6−0.07×V7−0.1×V8−0.21×V9−0.22×V10−0.33×V11−0.35×V12−0.39×V13−0.51×V14−0.59×V15−0.63×V16−1.12×V17−1.69×V18+3.65.

[0248] The cut-off value of P was 0.527. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model F for calculation. When P>0.527, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.527, it was identified as healthy people. ROC analysis was conducted (as shown in FIG. 18), and the model F had a AUC of 0.903, and specificity and sensitivity of 0.856 and 0.801 respectively.

[0249] VII. The variables and parameters of model G were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00025 TABLE 25 List of variables and parameters of model G No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio V1 Hypoxanthine 1.67 5.31 V2 Alanine 0.34 1.40 V3 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.10 1.11 V4 Aminocaproic acid 0.01 1.01 V5 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine −0.08 0.92 V6 Ergothioneine −0.08 0.92 V7 Decanoylcarnitine −0.09 0.91 V8 Nicotine −0.10 0.90 V9 Hippuric acid −0.12 0.89 V10 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.23 0.79 V11 Citrulline −0.27 0.76 V12 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.36 0.70 V13 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.36 0.70 V14 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.38 0.68 V15 Ecgonine −0.56 0.57 V16 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine −0.61 0.54 V17 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −0.66 0.52 V18 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −1.20 0.30 V19 Lysine −1.89 0.15 constant 4.00 /

[0250] The equation of model G was: In[P/(1−P)]=1.67×V1+0.34×V2+0.1×V3+0.01×V4−0.08×V5−0.08×V6−0.09×V7−0.1×V8−0.12×V9−0.23×V10−0.27×V11−0.36×V12−0.36×V13−0.38×V14−0.56×V15−0.61×V16−0.66×V17−1.2×V18−1.89×V19+4.

[0251] The cut-off value of P was 0.450. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model G for calculation. When P>0.450, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.450, it was identified as healthy people. ROC analysis was conducted (as shown in FIG. 19), and the model G had a AUC of 0.904, and specificity and sensitivity of 0.793 and 0.868 respectively.

[0252] IX. The variables and parameters of model H were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00026 TABLE 26 List of variables and parameters of model H No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio V1 Hypoxanthine 2.03 7.61 V2 Alanine 0.47 1.60 V3 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.15 1.16 V4 Tiglylcarnitine 0.09 1.09 V5 N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine 0.04 1.04 V6 Aminocaproic acid 0.03 1.03 V7 Oxindole 0.01 1.01 V8 Decanoylcarnitine −0.12 0.89 V9 Nicotine −0.12 0.89 V10 Ergothioneine −0.13 0.88 V11 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine −0.14 0.87 V12 Hippuric acid −0.14 0.87 V13 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.27 0.76 V14 Lactic acid −0.36 0.70 V15 Citrulline −0.37 0.69 V16 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.37 0.69 V17 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.40 0.67 V18 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.43 0.65 V19 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine −0.59 0.55 V20 Ecgonine −0.63 0.53 V21 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −0.75 0.47 V22 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −1.37 0.25 V23 Lysine −2.18 0.11 constant 4.56 /

[0253] The equation of model H was: In[P/(1−P)]=2.03×V1+0.47×V2+0.15×V3+0.09×V4+0.04×V5+0.03×V6+0.01×V7−0.12×V8−0.12×V9−0.13×V10−0.14×V11−0.14×V12−0.27×V13−0.36×V14−0.37×V15−0.37×V16−0.4×V17−0.43×V18−0.59×V19−0.63×V20−0.75×V21−1.37×V22−2.18×V23+4.56.

[0254] The cut-off value of P was 0.466. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model H for calculation. When P>0.466, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.466, it was identified as healthy people. ROC analysis was conducted (as shown in FIG. 20), and the model H had a AUC of 0.911, and specificity and sensitivity of 0.822 and 0.860 respectively.

[0255] X. The variables and parameters of model I were listed in the table below:

TABLE-US-00027 TABLE 27 List of variables and parameters of model I No. Metabolites Weights Odds ratio V1 Hypoxanthine 3.08 21.76 V2 Octanoylcarnitine 1.26 3.53 V3 Alanine 0.70 2.01 V4 3-hydroxydodecanoyl carnitine 0.64 1.90 V5 Xanthine 0.41 1.51 V6 2-Ketobutyric acid 0.40 1.49 V7 Oxindole 0.38 1.46 V8 Tiglylcarnitine 0.31 1.36 V9 N6,N6,N6-Trimethylysine 0.31 1.36 V10 Cyclohexaneacetic acid 0.10 1.11 V11 Aminocaproic acid 0.09 1.09 V12 Methylimidazoleacetic acid 0.09 1.09 V13 Homo-L-arginine 0.04 1.04 V14 Pyruvic acid −0.04 0.96 V15 2-Octenoylcarnitine −0.04 0.96 V16 Propionylcarnitine −0.07 0.93 V17 Nicotine −0.12 0.89 V18 Serotonin −0.17 0.84 V19 Phenylacetylglutamine −0.24 0.79 V20 Hippuric acid −0.24 0.79 V21 Ergothioneine −0.26 0.77 V22 3-hydroxybutyryl carnitine −0.31 0.73 V23 alpha-Eleostearic acid −0.32 0.73 V24 Inosine −0.44 0.64 V25 Citrulline −0.44 0.64 V26 Trimethylamine N-oxide −0.49 0.61 V27 3-hydroxyoctanoyl carnitine −0.53 0.59 V28 1-Methylnicotinamide −0.63 0.53 V29 3-hydroxydecanoyl carnitine −0.73 0.48 V30 Hexanoylcarnitine −0.79 0.45 V31 Decanoylcarnitine −0.81 0.44 V32 Ecgonine −0.81 0.44 V33 2-trans,4-cis-Decadienoylcarnitine −0.85 0.43 V34 Ethyl 3-oxohexanoate −1.20 0.30 V35 Lactic acid −1.62 0.20 V36 Arabinosylhypoxanthine −1.72 0.18 V37 Lysine −3.68 0.03 constant 7.11 /

[0256] The equation of model I was: In[P/(1−P)]=3.08×V1+1.26×V2+0.7×V3+0.64×V4+0.41×V5+0.4×V6+0.38×V7+0.31×V8+0.31×V9+0.1×V10+0.09×V11+0.09×V12+0.04×V13−0.04×V14−0.04×V15−0.07×V16−0.12×V17−0.17×V18−0.24×V19−0.24×V20−0.26×V21−0.31×V22−0.32×V23−0.44×V24−0.44×V25−0.49×V26−0.53×V27−0.63×V28−0.73×V29−0.79×V30−0.81×V31−0.81×V32−0.85×V33−1.2×V34−1.62×V35−1.72×V36−3.68×V37+7.11.

[0257] The cut-off value of P was 0.456. That was, the serum detection values (relative abundances) of the aforementioned markers was substituted into the equation of model I for calculation. When P>0.456, it was identified as lung cancer; and when P≤0.456, it was identified as healthy people. ROC analysis was conducted (as shown in FIG. 21), and the model I had a AUC of 0.923, and specificity and sensitivity of 0.828 and 0.868 respectively.

[0258] The models A to I described above were just illustrative examples for showing models for auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer as established by a combination of multiple biomarkers. These models are of great value for the differential diagnosis of lung cancer. It should be noted that the aforementioned models are not exhaustive, and the models established by selecting and combining multiple biomarkers from Table 3 or multiple biomarkers from Table 4 should fall within the scope of the present application, and also had diagnostic values. Meanwhile, it was not limited to the biomarkers in Table 3 or 4, and the biomarkers in Table 3 or 4 could also be selected to establish a model for auxiliary diagnosis of lung cancer together with known biomarkers.