PHASE CONFOCAL METHOD FOR NEAR-FIELD MICROWAVE IMAGING
20170356995 · 2017-12-14
Assignee
Inventors
- Wenyi SHAO (Laurel, MD, US)
- Todd R. MCCOLLOUGH (Barrington, IL, US)
- William J. MCCOLLOUGH (Earlysville, VA, US)
- Arezou EDALATI (Arlington, VA, US)
Cpc classification
G01N22/00
PHYSICS
G01S13/887
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
An efficient RADAR imaging method that is able to detect an object within an interested area. This method uses electromagnetic waves transmitted by one or many transmitters to illuminate the interested area, and then estimates the phase shift of the scattered wave of an object according to the path that the electromagnetic wave propagated. By reversing the phase of the obtained scattered signal to the transmitters' position, an image is constructed for the entire interested area according to the correlation of signals in all channels. The present method works in the frequency domain. It produces a microwave image by using the phase and magnitude of the obtained signal, or using the phase information only. Other unique features include the way it synthesizes the signals obtained in multiple channels and at multiple frequencies. Its overwhelming high efficiency makes rapid microwave imaging and real-time imaging possible.
Claims
1. A system for producing a microwave (MW) image, the system comprising: a MW transmitter, configured to transmit a MW towards an object; a MW receiver, configured to detect a MW signal received from the object; a computation processor programmed to produce an image of the object using a shifted phase of a plurality of detected MW signals; wherein the computation processor is programmed to compute the shifted phase by (1) calculating a phase shift due to a wave propagation distance from the MW transmitter to the MW receiver via a focal point at a frequency of a transmitted MW, and (2) compensating a phase of a detected MW signal using the phase shift to produce the shifted phase.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the computation processor is programmed to compute an inverse of a summation of (1) a variance of the sine of the shifted phase and (2) a variance of the cosine of the shifted phase.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the computation processor is programmed to sum detected MW signals with phase replaced by shifted phase.
4. The system of claim 1 further comprising a controller programmed to move the MW transmitter and the MW receiver.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the MW transmitter comprises a plurality of MW transmitter antennas and the MW receiver comprises a plurality of MW receiver antennas.
6. A method for producing a microwave (MW) image, comprising: transmitting a MW from a MW transmitter towards an object; detecting, with a MW receiver, a MW signal received from the object; controlling a movement of the MW transmitter and the MW receiver around the object; calculating wave propagation distances from the MW transmitter and the MW receiver to focal points using a frequency of a transmitted MW signal to produce a phase shift; compensating a phase of a detected MW signal using the phase shift to produce a shifted phase; and producing an image of the object using the shifted phase of a plurality of detected MW signals.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the detected MW signal is a signal collected using a vector network analyzer represented as an S parameter.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein the detected MW signal is a time domain signal collected using an oscilloscope which has been converted to the frequency domain using a Fourier transform.
9. The method of claim 6 wherein the wave propagation distance includes the distance of a path a wave propagates from the MW transmitter to a focal point and then from the focal point to the MW receiver.
10. The method of claim 6 wherein producing an image of the object further comprises computing an inverse of a summation of (1) a variance of the sine of the shifted phase and (2) a variance of the cosine of the shifted phase.
11. The method of claim 6 wherein producing an image of the object further comprises treating complex-number detected MW signals as unit vectors.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein producing an image of the object further comprises calculating an average of a squared distance from unit vectors to their mean position.
13. The method of claim 6 wherein producing an image of the object further comprises summing detected MW signals with phase replaced by shifted phase.
14. A method for producing a microwave (MW) image using multiple frequencies, comprising: transmitting a MW from a MW transmitter towards an object; detecting, with a MW receiver, a MW signal received from the object; wherein the transmitting and detecting comprises transmitting and detecting at multiple frequencies; controlling a movement of the MW transmitter and the MW receiver around the object; calculating wave propagation distances from the MW transmitter and MW receiver to focal points using the frequencies of transmission to produce phase shifts; compensating a phase of detected MW signals using the phase shifts to produce shifted phases for each frequency; and producing an image of the object using the shifted phases of a plurality of MW signals at the multiple frequencies.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein the MW transmitter and MW receiver comprise UWB antennas.
16. The method of claim 15 further comprising compensating the phase of detected MW signals based on a phase change in a connector on a transmitter antenna end, a phase change in a transmitter antenna, a phase change in a receiver antenna, and a phase change in a connector on a receiver antenna end.
17. The method of claim 14 wherein producing an image of the object further comprises computing an inverse of a summation of (1) a variance of a sine of shifted phase and (2) a variance of the cosine of the shifted phase for all frequency components.
18. The method of claim 14 wherein producing an image of the object further comprises summing multiple frequency detected MW signals with phase replaced by shifted phase.
19. The method of claim 14 wherein the computational processor calculates wave propagation distance taking different refractions of mediums into account.
20. A system for producing a microwave (MW) image, the system comprising: a MW transmitter, configured to transmit a MW towards an object; a MW receiver, configured to detect a MW signal received from the object; a computation processor programmed to for each of a plurality of focal points at a frequency of a transmitted MW, calculate a phase shift due to a wave propagation distance from the MW transmitter to the focal point and then from the focal point to the MW receiver, compensating phases of microwaves detected by the MW receiver using the calculated phase shifts to produce wave propagation distance compensated phases, and producing an image of the object based on a coherency of the wave propagation distance compensated phases.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] Embodiments will now be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, given only by way of example, in which:
[0010]
[0011]
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
[0025] The measurement process can be carried out either in the time domain or in the frequency domain. When measurements are carried out in the time domain, a system as illustrated in
[0026] When measurements are carried out in the frequency domain, a system as illustrated in
[0027] The antenna arrangement in
[0028] There are some advantages and disadvantages to collecting data in either the time domain or the frequency domain. An advantage of a time domain measurement over a frequency domain measurement is that a reconstruction algorithm based on time domain data employs the scattered field of the object over an entire wideband rather than a few selected discrete frequencies. As such, high resolution is better able to be achieved in the reconstructions. A downside of a time domain measurement over a frequency domain measurement is that time domain signals are often distorted in shape as they propagate in a dispersive and/or lossy medium. This may degrade the image quality in the reconstruction. An advantage of a frequency domain measurement is that the signal-to-noise ratio is usually better than that in the time domain.
[0029] Unlike other methods the present inventive concepts can use data recorded from a VNA directly. When the measurement is executed by the system in
[0030] A discussion of S parameters is contained in “Microwave Engineering”, 3.sup.rd edition, by David M. Pozar, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for the discussion of such parameters.
[0031]
[0032] The first step 401 is to perform any calibration necessary prior to data collection. The second step 402 is to collect the electromagnetic signal using the system of
[0033]
where v is the wave speed travelling in air. The phase delay between two antennas is
where λ is the wavelength. Assuming the same antennas are utilized for 104 and 105, by a simple transmission-reception test, the time delay in one antenna (from the antenna's port 501 to the antenna's end 503, or 504 to 502) can be calculated as
where T denotes the time shift between the measured output signal and input signal, and
A similar method can be used to calculate the phase delays in the antenna which can be written as
where Φ denotes the phase difference between the output signal and input signal, and
With this approach accurate time shifts of waves propagating in a medium (from antenna end 503 to antenna end 504) in real detections can be obtained by T′−(T−t), or phase shifts by Φ′−(Φ−φ), where T′ and Φ′ is the measured shift in real detections from 501 to 502. In some embodiments the calibration step 401 can be performed after the data collection step 402.
[0034] Step 403 involves obtaining scattered signals by a subtraction process. The path that a signal travels from one of the M locations to one of the N reception locations is called a channel. In each channel, by subtracting the incident field from the total field, the scattered field of the object is obtained and saved in an M×N matrix, representing the measured results for corresponding transmission locations and reception locations.
[0035] In step 404 the electrical distances from receivers to focal points and then to transmitters is calculated. This distance can in some cases include the physical distance from receivers to focal points and then from the focal points to transmitters which can be calculated by using the Euclidean distance formula and knowing the Cartesian coordinates. The electrical distance calculation can be elaborated with the help of
[0036] In step 405, the phase change of the wave as it propagates is calculated by using the equation
at a particular frequency.
for each channel. The phase of the obtained signals will rotate back by
counterclockwise, as if all the signals back-propagate to their initial position. As a result, when the computation focuses on a focal point like 602 where the object is present and the wave really scattered at this focal point, the phase of all the signals will return to their common initial phase after phase compensation (the phases are coherent), as shown in
[0037] In the m-n channel, where the phase of the signal collected by the n.sup.th receiver is ψ.sub.mn, the phase after compensation (back-propagating to the transmitter's place) ψ′.sub.mn is
ψ′.sub.mn=ψ.sub.mn+Δψ.sub.mn
[0038] Δψ.sub.mn is the phase delay in air, that is, the phase delay to the focal point based on distance.
[0039] In step 406 a decision is made if there is single frequency or multiple frequency data that has been collected. If single frequency data is collected then the signals are synthesized in step 407. If multiple frequency data is collected, then a check is made to determine if this is the last frequency applied in step 409. The last frequency is the highest frequency present in a set of multiple frequencies. If the last frequency is not yet reached, then in step 410 the current data is saved and the next frequency is selected. Then step 404 is started with the next frequency. If the last frequency is applied, then the signals at all frequencies are synthesized in step 411.
[0040] If the detection uses a single frequency (step 407), a total of M×N signals (M×N complex numbers) will be synthesized to calculate the pixel value at each focal point, and an image showing the entire distribution can be produced.
[0041] Theoretically, the compensated phase values LP′ are expected to be identical in all channels, if the same detection signal was used by the transmitters. In the present invention, two separate methods are developed to synthesize signals. In both methods, the complex-number signals are treated as vectors. The first method to synthesize signals is vector addition. In
[0042] The second method to synthesize the M×N signals is relatively complex, but is more likely to achieve a better performance. In this method, the magnitude of the complex-number signals is completely ignored such that all of the signals are thought of as unit vectors only. Then, instead of an addition computation, the average of the squared distance from all unit vectors to their mean position is computed. As an example,
The variable d.sub.m,n is the average of the squared distance from all unit vectors to their mean position for each of the M×N signals. The mean position of M×N signals
in the Cartesian coordinates can be written in another form:
where ψ.sub.m,n is the phase of the M×N signals. A simpler statistic form can be used to show what is calculated:
Q({right arrow over (r)})=σ.sup.2(Cos(ψ′.sub.m,n))+σ.sup.2(Sin(ψ′.sub.m,n))
where σ.sup.2 represents a variance computation. As a result, in locations where an object is present, a small variance value is present and can be converted to a large pixel value in the image by a reciprocal computation:
P({right arrow over (r)}) will be the pixel value of the image in the position {right arrow over (r)}.
[0043] The PCM uses the phase of S (when measuring with a VNA) which actually represents the phase change from the port of transmitter 104 to the port of receiver 105, if the VNA is calibrated correctly in advance. More specifically, the phase change consists of five parts: phase change in the connector on the transmitter end (Φ.sub.TC), phase change in the transmitter antenna (Φ.sub.T), phase change of propagation in space (Δψ.sub.space), phase change in the receiver antenna (Φ.sub.R), and phase change in the connector on the receiver end (Φ.sub.RC). The total phase change is represented in the following equation:
ΔΦ=Φ.sub.TC+Φ.sub.T+Δψ.sub.space+Φ.sub.RC+Φ.sub.R
In single frequency detection, since Φ.sub.TC, Φ.sub.T, Φ.sub.RC, Φ.sub.R are fixed in all channels, there is only a need to compensate the phase change in space, i.e., Δψ.sub.space. There is no need to know the other four terms, nor are they used in the single-frequency PCM.
[0044] When multiple frequencies or a UWB signal is applied, the phase delay for each frequency component will take turns being calculated and compensated. The phase delay in the connectors and antennas (Φ.sub.TC+Φ.sub.T,Φ.sub.RC+Φ.sub.R) varies with frequency, so these four terms have to be taken into account in the phase compensation when applying multiple-frequency PCM. As a result, ΔΦ containing five parts will all be applied in the phase compensation step in multiple-frequency PCM instead of only using Δψ.sub.space as in single-frequency PCM. The value of Φ.sub.TC+Φ.sub.T and Φ.sub.RC+Φ.sub.R can be found by a simple test on the VNA in advance of the data collection.
[0045] When the object is buried or existing in a dispersive medium (human body tissues, etc.), the present method is able to accurately estimate the contribution of every frequency component. It is known that wave propagation speed varies with frequency in a dispersive medium and refraction rate varies with frequency as well.
[0046] The approach that synthesizes the signals from all channels and all frequencies (Step 411) is similar to the single frequency case. The only difference is that it will have L×M×N signals to process, where L is the number of frequencies applied. The multiple frequency equation to synthesize signals is:
Q({right arrow over (r)})=σ.sup.2(Cos(ψ′.sub.mnl))+σ.sup.2(Sin(ψ′.sub.mnl))
When the measurement is made in the frequency domain, it is assumed all frequency components have the same initial phase. Thus, the phases from all channels and all frequencies are expected to be correlated after the phase compensation step when the focal point falls in the object's location. If the measurement is taken in the time domain, the initial phases of frequency components in a UWB signal are usually unequal. Thus, an additional step that subtracts the initial phases of the frequency components in the UWB signal from the compensated phases must be taken into account in the multiple-frequency method.
[0047] After the single frequency and multiple frequency step of synthesizing the signals is complete (steps 407 and 411 respectively) then an image is constructed using the synthesized data in steps 408 or 412 respectively. The vector addition method linearly converts the output to a pixel value to form an image. The image is constructed using the previously presented equation for P({right arrow over (r)}) in the variance method.
[0048]
[0049] Unlike other RADAR-based algorithms using magnitudes such as the conventional Delay and Sum (DAS) that usually adds a weight term for all signals to compensate for the decay in propagation, the inventive algorithm does not require this kind of compensation. There is no need to consider the antennas' gains pattern in PCM, which is often required in methods that use magnitudes. This reduces the likeliness of causing artificial errors and also avoids any additional steps for antenna-factor calibration.
[0050] Another advantage of the present method is its efficiency. The total processing time, including phase estimation and compensation, multiple channels and multiple frequencies synthesis, and an image buildup only takes a couple of seconds on a regular personal computer. This efficiency is better than existing microwave imaging approaches. If speedup in data collection can be achieved (by means of appropriately increasing the number of antennas) and a super computer is available to run the invented method, a real-time microwave image is feasible.
[0051] The invention is not limited to the embodiments described above. Many other variations of the invention are possible and depend on the particular requirements at hand. This invention may also be used in ultra-sonic imaging and many other scenarios. Such variations and different application areas are within the scope and spirit of the invention. The invention is therefore defined with reference to the following claims.