Rotary injector and process of adding fluxing solids in molten aluminum
09840754 · 2017-12-12
Assignee
Inventors
- Joseph Langlais (Saguenay, CA)
- Peter Donald Waite (Saguenay, CA)
- Francis Breton (Saguenay, CA)
- Serge Munger (Saguenay, CA)
Cpc classification
F27D27/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C22B9/103
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F27D3/0033
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C22C1/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C22B9/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F27D3/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
C22C1/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F27D27/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A rotary injector comprising an elongated shaft having a proximal end and a distal end, and an impeller at the distal end of the elongated shaft, the elongated shaft and the impeller being collectively rotatable during operation around an axis of the shaft, the rotary injector being hollow and having an internal supply conduit extending along the shaft and across the impeller, the supply conduit having an inlet at the proximal end of the shaft, a main portion extending from the inlet to a discharge portion, the discharge portion extending to an axial outlet, the discharge portion having a narrow end connecting the main portion of the supply conduit and a broader end at the axial outlet.
Claims
1. A process of treating molten aluminum using a rotary injector, the process comprising: introducing a head of the rotary injector into the molten aluminum, the head of the rotary injector having an impeller with blades; and while the head of the rotary injector, including the blades, is maintained immersed in the molten aluminum and rotated, simultaneously: entraining particulate treatment solids using a carrier gas along a supply conduit along a shaft of the rotary injector and out from an axial outlet of the head of the rotary injector, reducing a speed of the particulate treatment solids at a discharge portion of the supply conduit by an increase in a cross-sectional surface area of the supply conduit, and shearing the particulate treatment solids exiting the axial outlet by rotation of the blades.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the process is performed in a furnace having a quantity of aluminum of between 10 and 150 tons.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the introducing the head of the rotary injector is performed when the molten aluminum is at a temperature below 720° C.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the temperature is below 700° C.
5. The process of claim 3 wherein the entraining particulate treatment solids is performed during hot metal charging of the molten aluminum.
6. The process of claim 3 wherein the entraining particulate treatment solids is performed prior to a step of alloying.
7. The process of claim 3 wherein the entraining particulate treatment solids is performed in parallel with other furnace operations.
8. The process of claim 3 wherein the process is performed during charging a last potroom crucible, once a quantity of aluminum has reached 90 tons.
9. The process of claim 1 wherein the entraining particulate treatment solids is performed during hot metal charging of the molten aluminum.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein the entraining particulate treatment solids is performed prior to a step of alloying.
11. The process of claim 1 wherein the entraining particulate treatment solids is performed in parallel with other furnace operations.
12. The process of claim 1 wherein the process is performed during charging a last potroom crucible, once a quantity of aluminum has reached 90 tons.
13. A process of treating molten aluminum using a rotary injector, the process comprising: introducing a head of the rotary injector into the molten aluminum; while the head of the rotary injector is in the molten aluminum, entraining particulate treatment solids along a supply conduit along a shaft of the rotary injector and out from the head of the rotary injector, while rotating an impeller at the head of the rotary injector, and; reducing a speed of the particulate treatment solids at a discharge portion of the supply conduit by an increase in a cross-sectional surface area of the supply conduit; wherein the entraining the particulate treatment solids is performed during hot metal charging of the molten aluminum.
14. The process of claim 13 wherein the introducing the head of the rotary injector is performed when the molten aluminum is at a temperature below 720° C.
15. A process of treating molten aluminum using a rotary injector, the process comprising: introducing a head of the rotary injector into the molten aluminum; while the head of the rotary injector is in the molten aluminum, entraining particulate treatment solids along a supply conduit along a shaft of the rotary injector and out from the head of the rotary injector, while rotating an impeller at the head of the rotary injector, and; reducing a speed of the particulate treatment solids at a discharge portion of the supply conduit by an increase in a cross-sectional surface area of the supply conduit; wherein the process is performed during charging a last potroom crucible, once a quantity of aluminum has reached 90 tons.
16. The process of claim 15 wherein the introducing the head of the rotary injector is performed when the molten aluminum is at a temperature below 720° C.
17. A rotary injector comprising an elongated shaft having a proximal end and a distal end, and an impeller at the distal end of the elongated shaft, the elongated shaft and the impeller being collectively rotatable during operation around an axis of the shaft, the rotary injector being hollow and having an internal supply conduit extending along the shaft and through the impeller, the supply conduit having an inlet at the proximal end of the shaft, a main portion extending from the inlet to a discharge portion, the discharge portion extending to an axial outlet, the discharge portion having a narrow end connecting the main portion of the supply conduit and a broader end at the axial outlet; wherein the impeller has a distal face opposite the shaft, and blades protruding axially from the distal face, the blades being external to and surrounding the axial outlet.
18. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the discharge portion has a truncated conical shape.
19. The rotary injector of claim 18 wherein the axial outlet has a sharp edge.
20. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the axial outlet has a sharp edge.
21. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the discharge portion has an angle of between about 5 and 20° relative the shaft axis.
22. The rotary injector of claim 21 wherein the discharge portion has an angle of between 5 and 15° relative the shaft axis.
23. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the discharge portion has a length of about 3 inches along the shaft axis.
24. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein a surface ratio of an upstream end of the discharge portion and the axial outlet is between 1.25 and 7.25.
25. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the impeller is provided in the form of a distinct component from the shaft and is removable therefrom.
26. The rotary injector of claim 25 wherein the distal end of the shaft and the impeller are matingly engaged to one another via corresponding male and female threads.
27. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the shaft and the impeller are made of graphite.
28. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein when the rotary injector is used to treat molten metal, the axial outlet is directly exposed to the molten metal.
29. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the discharge portion and supply conduit are used to feed particulate treatment solids when the rotary injector is used to treat molten metal and are empty prior to said use.
30. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the distal face of the impeller is a radially-extending surface.
31. The rotary injector of claim 30 wherein the distal face of the impeller is oriented perpendicular to the axis of the shaft.
32. The rotary injector of claim 1 wherein the blades extend axially beyond the axial outlet of the supply conduit.
Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
(1) In the figures,
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22) In the above figures, the acronym RFI refers to Rotary Flux Injector.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(23) Referring to
(24) One embodiment of an impeller 16 which can be selectively mounted or dismounted to a shaft is shown in greater detail in
(25)
(26) Using rotary flux injector such as described above, it was found that significant clogging problems were encountered at low temperatures, to the point of restricting the use of the apparatus. Studies were carried out and it was found that the clogging was due to the formation of a plug of metal at the discharge portion of the supply conduit. Indeed, it was found that when cold metal, for example at a temperature less than about 705-720° C., comes into contact with the shaft, it solidifies and forms a plug thereby significantly reducing and interrupting the fluxing treatment. This is especially significant when the shaft is made of a heat conducting material such as graphite which can drain heat from the molten metal at a significant rate. The relationship between blockage occurrences and the temperature of molten aluminum is exemplified in the graph provided at
(27) In the production of some alloys, such as the 5000 aluminum series for instance, the fluxing time can be significant, such as more than one hour for instance, which has a direct impact on the furnace cycle. To reduce the impact of fluxing on the cycle time, it can be desired to pre-flux, a practice which consists in doing a portion of the fluxing while the liquid metal is being loaded into the furnace. Using a rotary flux injector in pre-fluxing was found problematic due to the blocking issues. For alloys in the 5000 series, the fluxing temperatures were between 740 and 750° C. whereas the pre-fluxing is carried out at temperatures between 680 and 700° C.
(28) Tests were made using a typical rotary flux injector such as shown in
(29) More specifically, it is understood that upon insertion of the shaft into the molten metal, the static metallic pressure allows aluminum to penetrate into the discharge portion of the supply conduit. The graphite shaft forms a heat sink which solidifies the metal within the discharge portion.
(30) The blockage mechanism is shown in
(31) An alternate embodiment of a rotary flux injector 114 schematized in
(32) It was found that using a broadening discharge portion 134 having a sharp edge can not only allow to address the occurrences of blockages at low temperatures, but can surprisingly also increase the shearing efficiency.
Example 1
(33) Tests were conducted with the rotary flux injector 114. In this first example, the angle α of the discharge portion was of 10°, with the discharge portion diameter being of ⅞″ at its connection with the main portion of the supply conduit, and broadening out in a truncated conical fashion along a length of the of 3 inches, to a diameter of 2⅛″ at the sharp outlet. 6 tests were conducted at 680° C. and nitrogen flow rate of 150 L/min in a 6-ton furnace. A typical result set is illustrated in
(34) A seventh test was conducted which was interrupted during the blockage and in which the metal plug was retrieved. The metal plug is illustrated at
(35) To determine the impact of this change of shape on the dynamics of alkali removal from molten metal, calcium removal curves were drawn, these curves are illustrated at
(36) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparison between traditional rotary flux injector and rotary flux injector having truncated-conical discharge portion Kinetic constant Standard Type of rotary flux injector (min.sup.−1) deviation Traditional with continuous 0.1236 0.0083 cylindrical discharge portion With truncated-conical discharge 0.1615 0.0107 portion with sharp outlet edge
(37) Surprisingly, it was found that using a truncated-conical shape of the discharge portion with a sharp outlet edge not only facilitated the removal of the metal plug but could also provide, at least in this test environment, the unexpected advantage of improving the kinetics of the treatment of the metal (fluxing).
(38) The rotary injectors used for the tests summarized in Table 1 are shown in
Example 2
(39) Tests were conducted with discharge portion of the shaft having the same length and angle than the one described in Example 1 above, but where the outlet edge was rounded with a 1 cm radius such as shown in
(40) More specifically, tests were done in the same 6-ton furnace, with a nitrogen flow rate of 150 L/min, and a salt flow rate of 350 g/min. An initially determined calcium concentration of 15 ppm was added to the molten metal in the 6 ton furnace before each of the tests. The results are presented in
(41) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparison between traditional rotary flux injector, rotary flux injector having a broadening discharge portion with a sharp outlet edge, and rotary flux injector having discharge portion with a rounded outlet edge Kinetic constant Standard Type of rotary flux injector (min.sup.−1) deviation Traditional with continuous 0.1236 0.0083 cylindrical discharge portion With discharge portion with sharp 0.1615 0.0107 outlet edge With discharge portion with 1 cm 0.0964 0.0045 radius rounded outlet edge
(42) It was found that the alkali removal kinetics (shearing efficiency) decreased significantly with this configuration (broadening discharge portion having sharp edges). It is believed that this diminution of efficiency can be explained at least in part by the Coanda effect. By following the surface of the discharge portion, the trajectory of the salt becomes radial. The salt is sheared by the impeller, but it is propulsed more rapidly to the surface of the molten metal, reducing its residence time in the molten metal. Observations of large accumulations of liquid salt at the surface of the metal appears to confirm this theory. These large accumulations of liquid salt were not present in the other results presented at Table 1. Accordingly, it was concluded that the sharp edges of the oultet, i.e. a radius significantly smaller than one cm, are an advantageous feature in better achieving the benefits of the improvements.
Example 3
(43) 21 tests were carried out using a shaft having a truncated-conical shaped discharge portion having a diameter extending from 2.2 cm at its junction with the main portion of the supply conduit to 5.4 cm at a sharp circular outlet edge thereof, along an axial length of 7.62 cm.
(44) Tests for parallel fluxing include 8 of the 21 tests. It consisted of fluxing during the charging of the last potroom crucible. The fluxing period for these tests always started as soon as the furnace reached a total of 90 tonnes of aluminum to ensure that the rotor is submerged in liquid metal.
(45) The measurements taken during parallel fluxing tests were: Pressure in the rotary injector shaft. Metal temperature using the furnace thermocouple and a thermocouple connected to a “Hioki” receiver. Metal samples used to measure sodium concentrations by spectroscopy.
(46) The 13 other fluxing tests were done during the standard fluxing practice. Only metal samples were taken during these tests.
(47) Metal samples for both tests (parallel fluxing and regular fluxing) were taken as follows: One metal sample was taken moments before the fluxing started. Once the fluxing had started, metal samples were taken every two minutes for the next 10 minutes. Afterwards, metal samples were taken every five minutes for the remaining fluxing time (typically, five minutes, for the parallel fluxing and 25 minutes, for the standard practice).
(48) To compare the sodium removal rates, the kinetic constants were calculated for each test and compared to those obtained from previous experimentation.
(49) It is sought to reduce the impact of the rotary injector treatment on the overall furnace cycle time. Three methods were studied to achieve this goal: Operate the rotary injector in parallel with other furnace operations. Eliminate the rotary injector blockage at low temperature to operate earlier in the furnace cycle. Reduce the fluxing time.
Characterization of the Rotary Injector Blockage Cycle when Operating Earlier in the Furnace Cycle
(50) Experimentation to characterize the rotary injector blocking cycle was done on eight different occasions. Table 3 summarizes general information concerning each test.
(51) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 General information concerning the blocking characterization tests Initial metal temperature Test (° C.) Blockage Fluxing 1 742 No Yes 2 705 Yes (1) Yes 3 760 No Yes 4 713 Yes (2) No 5 769 No Yes 6 767 No Yes 7 755 No Yes 8 770 No Yes
(52) Experimentations showed that in this context, a rotary injector shaft has a 5% chance to block when submerged in metal over 720° C. The probability to block increases as the temperature decreases. During the tests outlined above, only two tests out of the eight had an initial metal temperature low enough to block the rotary injector (Tests 2 and 4). Even though metal temperatures over 720° C. allow fluxing opportunities, the rare blocking events limited the number of analyses that could be done.
(53) However, lower metal temperatures were measured more frequently in previous experimentations. The higher metal temperatures measured in this experimentation are suspected to be caused by a better crucible management, reducing the metal heat loss before pouring it in the furnace.
(54) An example using Test No. 7 shows graphically the typical measurements obtained when metal temperatures are higher than 720° C. in
(55) Tests Nos. 2 and 4 had conditions to block the rotary injector shaft. Measurements for Test No. 2 are shown graphically in
(56) For this particular test No. 2, the initial metal temperature (≠705° C.) is significantly lower than the other tests. The increase in pressure from 3.5 to ≈11 PSI, after 4 minutes, characterizes the solidification of molten aluminum in the shaft. The following decrease in pressure indicates that the metal was expulsed and the shaft unblocked. The following test measurements are similar to the other tests without blockage, and fluxing was successfully completed during the 15.sup.th and 24.sup.th minute of the test.
(57) Finally, the blocking characterization was limited by the number of occasions to test the blockage.
(58) Sodium Removal Rate Analysis when Fluxing Earlier in the Furnace Cycle
(59) To evaluate the fluxing efficiency, the kinetic constant k (min.sup.−1) was calculated for each fluxing test. The higher the value, the faster the sodium concentration will decrease and therefore, the more efficient the rotary injector treatment is. The reference constant value used is 0.04 min.sup.−1 from previous measurements.
(60) The following equation describes the sodium removal rate:
(61)
Where:
(62) TABLE-US-00004 c.sub.0 Is the initial sodium concentration (ppm). c Is the sodium concentration (ppm) at a given time t. t Is the time (minutes) k Is the kinetic constant (min.sup.−1)
(63) The kinetic constants calculated for parallel fluxing were unreliable due to many furnace activities happening. These activities continuously change the metal's sodium concentration, interfering with the sodium removal rate calculation. For example, when solid metal melts or liquid metal is poured into the furnace. Table 4 below shows the information taken for each test including the calculated kinetic constant k.
(64) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 4 Kinetic values and other related information for each parallel fluxing test Initial sodium Final sodium Kinetic constant K Test (ppm) (ppm) (min−1) 1 8.5 3.4 0.068 2 9.6 6.3 0.037 3 8.5 6.6 0.025 4 N/A N/A N/A 5 8.0 4.1 0.053 6 7.3 4.1 0.031 7 0.3 0.3 0.012 8 12.8 7.85 0.041
(65) To increase the precision of the sodium removal rate calculation, testing was continued but this time without any sodium concentration interference. To do so, more fluxing tests were done during the standard fluxing period (after alloying).
(66) Sodium Removal Rate Analysis During Standard Fluxing Practice
(67) Previous experimentation showed an increase of the rotary injector sodium removal rate when fluxing with the tapered shaft. To measure the removal rate, kinetic constants were calculated for more fluxing tests that were done during the standard fluxing practice. Information concerning all 13 tests is shown in Table 5 below.
(68) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5 Kinetic values and other related information for each parallel fluxing test Kinetic Alloy Initial sodium Final sodium constant K Test Series (ppm) (ppm) (min.sup.−1) R.sup.2 1 5XXX 1.2 0.1 0.0394 0.71 2 3XXX 2.8 0.3 0.0961 0.95 3 3XXX 0.4 N/A 0.0918 0.37 4 3XXX 4.3 0.3 0.0738 0.87 5 3XXX 5.5 0.5 0.1015 0.97 6 3XXX 5.2 0.7 0.0831 0.96 7 3XXX 0.9 N/A N/A N/A 8 3XXX 1.2 0.1 0.1052 0.87 9 3XXX 6.5 1.15 0.0484 0.97 10 3XXX 4.1 0.1 0.0358 0.91 11 3XXX 1.5 0.09 0.0722 0.97 12 3XXX 0.6 0.2 0.0514 0.93 13 5XXX 4.5 N/A 0.0522 0.98
(69) Thirteen fluxing tests were done, however, Tests Nos 1, 3 and 7 have not been considered because the sodium concentrations were too low and caused spectroscopy measurements to be unreliable. Many tests have a very high alkali removal rate value which is about twice the value of the reference data. It is believed that the tapered rotary injector shaft slows the gas flow rate and allows more salt to flow through the rotary injector rotor. Therefore, shearing is increased, and the kinetic of the reaction is increased.
(70) However, the obtained kinetic values are separated into two different groups. In fact, Test No. 9 shows a kinetic constant very different from the preceding tests and has a value similar to that of reference data (k≈0.04 min.sup.−1). For this particular experiment, the salt flow rate in the rotary injector was slower than usual. Afterwards, observations showed that the tapered shaft was partially clogged with metal treatment residues. Tests following this event (10 to 13) all show kinetic constants that are significantly lower than the first eight tests.
(71) As seen in
(72)
(73) As shown in
(74) The kinetic values are shown graphically in
(75) Potential Reduction of the Fluxing Impact on the Overall Furnace Cycle
(76) Based on historical data from the plant, it was found that fluxing at lower temperature earlier in the furnace cycle combined with the improved kinetics can reduce the impact of fluxing on furnace cycle time by 85%. Fluxing was performed during hot metal charging, alloying and other furnace operations.
Example 4
(77) Other tests were made using an angle α of 6°. These tests appeared to demonstrate comparable shearing efficiency to the tests conducted at 10° or 12°.
CONCLUSIONS
(78) It is believed that the broadening shape of the discharge portion 134 of the shaft 115 of the present apparatus (shown in
(79) This is schematized in
(80) As exemplified above, tests demonstrated the potential gains in shear efficiency for angles α of between about 5° and 15°, and it is believed that a broader range of conicity angle can be workable within 0° and 90° range, such as up to 20° for instance.
(81) Gains can also be obtained by the effect the broadening discharge portion can have on preventing metal plug blockages at low temperatures. More specifically, the broadening shape of the discharge portion of the shaft allows the use of the apparatus for fluxing metal at cold temperatures, for example ranging between 680 and 720° C., thereby increasing the efficiency of the overall casting center. Indeed, treating metal at colder temperatures allows fluxing to be carried out simultaneously with other furnace operations such as hot metal charging and/or prior to alloying. Due to clogging problems encountered in similar prior art apparatuses, fluxing could not be carried out at colder metal temperatures and was thus carried out after alloying of the molten metal.
(82) The shaft may be made of any appropriate material, preferably graphite. Many types of graphite may be used, including combinations. For example, the tapered discharge portion of the shaft may be made in a first material and the remainder of the shaft may be made in a 2.sup.nd material.
(83) Persons skilled in the art, in the light of the instant disclosure, will readily understand how to apply the teachings of this disclosure to other applications where particulate solids or gasses are to be mixed in a liquid using a rotary injector. It is believed that the gains in shearing efficiency can readily be applied to processes involving introducing gas or particulate materials to other types of metals than aluminum, and even in introducing gas or particulate materials to materials other than metals altogether. For instance, the broadening discharge portion can be applied to oxygen lances for the treatment of steel, or in injecting air in sludge floatation cells in the mining industry.
(84) In alternate embodiments, the length of the broadening discharge portion can vary. The length can vary as a function of the angle and of the size of the shaft. For instance, with a 15° angle, it would take a very big rotor to go deeper than about 3 inches. Moreover, tests have demonstrated limited effects of length on the results, the main effect stemming from the angle. On the other hand, if the gains associated to impeding blockages at low temperatures are sought, the length of the discharge portion should be of at least about the expected size of the metal plug which can be expected. In this logic, the required length is lesser when it is desired to operate the rotary injector at higher temperatures, and vice versa. To produce a rotary injector which is operable over a range of conditions, the length of the broadening discharge portion of the supply conduit can be made sufficient to tolerate the worst case scenario in terms of expected metal plug size, while factoring in desirable shearing efficiency. It is understood that the advantages of the broadening shape in impeding low temperature metal plug formation are associated with the corresponding expectable reduction in friction between the metal plug and the discharge portion of the supply conduit. More specifically, to expel a metal plug from a cylindrical discharge portion, the pressure differential across the plug must overcome the kinetic friction between the metal plug and the inner wall of the discharge portion, whereas this kinetic friction can be virtually eliminated by using a suitably shaped discharge portion. In the embodiments envisaged, the length of the broadening discharge portion is sufficient, at a given angle and shape, to allow speed reduction and a broadened jet to be ejected from the outlet in a manner to entrain and disperse the gas/flux mix efficiently in the shear zone.
(85) In some embodiments, the length can be selected as a function of the scale and angle between the inlet end of the discharge portion and the axial outlet, and more specifically in a manner to obtain a ratio of surface between the inlet end of the discharge portion and the axial outlet of between 1.25 and 7.25. For instance, in a scenario where the diameter of the internal supply conduit is of ⅞″ and corresponds to the diameter of the inlet end of the discharge portion, and with an angle of 7° from the axis between the inlet end of the discharge portion and the axial outlet, the axial length of the discharge portion can be between 0.5 and 6 inches; whereas in a scenario where the diameter of the internal supply conduit is of ⅞″ and corresponds to the diameter of the inlet end of the discharge portion, and with an angle of 15° from the axis between the inlet end of the discharge portion and the axial outlet, the axial length of the discharge portion can be between 0.2 and 2.75 inches. In some embodiments, it can be preferred to maintain the ratio of surfaces between 3 and 5 rather than between 1.25 and 7.25.
(86) In alternate embodiments, the actual shape of the broadening discharge portion can vary while maintaining a generally broadening shape within workable ranges.
(87) As can be understood from the above, the examples described above and illustrated are intended to be exemplary only. For instance, in alternate embodiments, the shaft and impeller can be of a single component rather than two assembled components, the shaft can be of various lengths, and the broadening discharge portion can be made as part of the shaft, of the impeller, or partially as part of both the shaft and the impeller. The scope is indicated by the appended claims.