Fuel cell freeze start method with anode pressure control
11682779 · 2023-06-20
Assignee
Inventors
- Pere Antoni Pastor Nigorra (Tuebingen, DE)
- Sven Schmalzriedt (Esslingen, DE)
- Richard Fellows (Vancouver, CA)
- Laura Iwan (Burnaby, CA)
Cpc classification
Y02E60/50
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
H01M2250/20
ELECTRICITY
Y02T90/40
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
H01M8/04223
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
A method for starting a fuel cell in a fuel cell system, at temperatures below the freezing point of water, includes, in a first step, that the hydrogen concentration in the anode is increased; after which, in a second step, an anode pressure is increased for a fixed period of time, and while air is supplied to the cathode, the maximum possible current is drawn from the fuel cell, and after which, in a third step, the fuel cell is switched in a load-free manner and the anode pressure is reduced. After the third step, the second step and the third step are repeated successively until a sufficient performance of the fuel cell for its normal operation is reached.
Claims
1. A method for starting a fuel cell in a fuel cell system at a temperature below a freezing point of water, comprising the steps of: increasing a hydrogen concentration in an anode in a first step; following the first step, increasing an anode pressure for a fixed period of time and, while air is supplied to the cathode, drawing a maximum possible current from the fuel cell in a second step; following the second step, switching the fuel cell in a load-free manner and reducing the anode pressure in a third step; and following the third step, repeating the second step and the third step consecutively until the fuel cell reaches a predetermined performance level for operation above the freezing point of water, wherein the increasing of the hydrogen concentration in the first step is performed while the anode pressure decreases during the first step with the discharge valve open until a predetermined emission limit for hydrogen in an exhaust gas is reached, and wherein, during the first step, air supplied to the cathode takes place at a lower level than during the second step.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein a change of the anode pressure is achieved by a combined control or regulation of a hydrogen dosage and a discharge valve for media from the anode.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein, before the first step, the anode pressure is increased and a function of the discharge valve is checked.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein, during the third step, no hydrogen is supplied into the anode.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein, during the third step, air supplied to the cathode is reduced compared to the air supplied to the cathode in the second step.
6. The method according to claim 3, wherein, while the anode pressure is increased before the first step, no air is supplied to the cathode.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein dosing of hydrogen into the anode takes place in a pulsating manner.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(3) In the depiction of
(4) A fuel cell 3 forms the core of such a fuel cell system 1, the fuel cell typically being designed as a stack of individual cells, a so-called fuel cell pile or fuel cell stack. In the depiction of
(5) From this inherently known so-called anode circuit 10, gas and water are discharged from time to time or as a function of, for example, a concentration of nitrogen in the anode circuit 10 via a water separator 11 and a discharge valve 12, also known as a purge valve. Via an exhaust pipe 13, this discharged exhaust gas passes, for example, into an exhaust pipe 14 from cathode 5 of the fuel cell 3 and is thus diluted with the exhaust air from cathode 5 and released into the surroundings. This dilution makes sense because hydrogen emissions occur in the exhaust gas from the exhaust pipe 13, which can be diluted by the exhaust air to such an extent that they only represent non-critical emissions during normal operation.
(6) The cathode 5 is supplied with air as an oxygen supplier. For this purpose, an air conveyor 15 is used, which can be designed as a flow compressor, for example. Often, this air conveyor 15 is also connected to an exhaust air turbine in the exhaust pipe 14 in order to recover pressure energy from the system and use it to drive the air conveyor 15. This is also not depicted here to simplify the illustration. Likewise, a depiction of a humidifier for the supply air is also omitted.
(7) In practice, it is now the case that liquid product water is produced inside the fuel cell during the electrochemical conversion of hydrogen and oxygen to electrical energy. This product water is very pure and will therefore typically freeze when the freezing point of water within fuel cell 3 is reached. During operation this is not an issue, as the typical temperature of the fuel cell 3 is in the range of 70° C. to 100° C. If, however, fuel cell system 1 is switched off, and in ambient conditions which have temperatures below freezing point, as is unavoidable in particular in a vehicle 2, then the water in fuel cell 3 can freeze. When the vehicle 2 or its fuel cell system 1 is restarted, it must then be ensured that the fuel cell 3 can be put into operation as quickly as possible and is treated as carefully as possible in order not to reduce the service life of the fuel cell 3 unnecessarily. At the same time, the process should be simple and efficient and should be able to forgo complex constructive measures and, for example, highly resistant catalyst components or correspondingly large quantities of catalyst. For this reason, the method described below is used for a so-called freeze start of the fuel cell system 1.
(8) In the depiction of
(9) Before the actual method starts, it is checked within a first period of time marked 0 whether the discharge valve 12 is functional. For this purpose, the anode pressure is increased, for example by dosing hydrogen via the pressure control and dosing device 7 when the drain valve 12 is first closed. The discharge valve 12 is then partially opened and the anode pressure p must drop accordingly. If it does not do so, it must be assumed that the discharge valve 12 is malfunctioning, i.e., it is frozen. This would first have to be remedied, for example, by defrosting the discharge valve 12 by means of electrical heating of the valve or similar.
(10) If the discharge valve 12 is functioning correctly, as indicated in the depiction of
(11) In the second method step II, which then follows, the actual freezing start is carried out by loading the fuel cell 3 with the maximum possible current in a design possibility with a reduced opening of the discharge valve 12 and increased volume flow dV/dt of the air conveyor 15, such an electrical power P.sub.el is drawn from the fuel cell 3, as can be seen in the diagram in
(12) Then in the third method step III, the electrical power P.sub.el is reduced by switching off the current, at the same time the hydrogen dosage is switched off and the discharge valve 12 is opened further. This results in a drop in the anode pressure p, while at the same time the volume flow dV/dt of the air is reduced. The hydrogen concentration % H.sub.2 is also reduced because the hydrogen is no longer dosed when the discharge valve is open.
(13) Following this third method step III, the anode pressure p is then increased again, the supplied volume flow of air dV/dt is increased again and the dosing for the hydrogen is opened again such that the concentration % H.sub.2 of hydrogen also increases accordingly. All this takes place again with a reduced opening of the discharge valve 12 and the maximum current which can be drawn from the fuel cell 3, such that a corresponding electrical load P.sub.el is set again. This method step is again the second method step II. It is then followed, as can be seen in the diagram, by the reduction of the anode pressure in the third method step III. The method steps II and III are therefore each run through twice in the diagram. In practice, a corresponding iteration takes place here, such that these method steps II and III are run through again and again for a longer period of time until the performance of the fuel cell is given. This is indicated accordingly by the oval-shaped arrow ITER above the sections II and III in the diagram of
(14) In this connection, for example, reaching a temperature limit can be used as the main criterion for determining the performance of the fuel cell. However, other possibilities for determining the performance of the fuel cell can also be considered, for example, simply a maximum number of iterations, a total amount of energy, a current integral, a sufficient polarization curve or many others.
(15) Due to the repeated alternation between short-term load and subsequent reduction of the anode pressure, a freeze start of the fuel cell 3 of the fuel cell system 1 is possible without the need for complex and elaborate additional components and/or an elaborate individual cell monitoring or the like. Thus, constructive and procedural measures to improve the freeze start capability of the fuel cell can be reduced or such measures can be dispensed with completely, making the operation simple, efficient, energy-saving and making the design small, light and cost-effective.