DETERMINING A POSITION OF A MOVABLE ELEMENT OF A LINEAR ACTUATOR WHICH IS INTENDED FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE

20170350727 · 2017-12-07

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

A method for determining a position of a movable element of a linear actuator of a motor vehicle includes supplying a current to a coil of the linear actuator so as to move and/or hold the movable element by a magnetic field of the coil generated by the supplied current; modulating the current supplied to the coil with an electrical alternating variable having a predetermined frequency; determining an impedance or an admittance of the coil at the predetermined frequency by measuring a further variable at the predetermined frequency; and determining the position of the movable element as a function of the determined impedance or admittance.

Claims

1.-13. (canceled)

14. A method for determining a position of a movable element of a linear actuator of a motor vehicle, comprising: supplying a current to a coil of the linear actuator so as to move and/or hold the movable element by a magnetic field of the coil generated by the supplied current; modulating the current supplied to the coil with an electrical alternating variable having a predetermined frequency; determining an impedance or an admittance of the coil at the predetermined frequency by measuring a further variable at the predetermined frequency; and determining the position of the movable element as a function of the determined impedance or admittance.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the linear actuator is configured as a locking device, said movable element forming a locking element of the locking device.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the locking device is constructed as a part of a parking lock of the motor vehicle.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein the predetermined frequency is predetermined in dependence on a concrete configuration of the linear actuator by determining a difference of the impedance of the coil for different positions of the movable element at different frequencies of the alternating variable and selecting a frequency with a greatest possible difference of the impedance in the different positions of the movable element as the predetermined frequency.

18. The method of claim 14, wherein the predetermined frequency for the alternating variable is between 10 Hz and 1000 Hz.

19. The method of claim 14, wherein the predetermined frequency for the alternating variable is between 25 and 200 Hz.

20. The method of claim 14, wherein the predetermined frequency for the alternating variable is between 50 Hz and 150 Hz.

21. The method of claim 14, wherein the coil current is modulated by the alternating variable by a value between 0.1 percent and 25 percent.

22. The method of claim 14, wherein the coil current is modulated by the alternating variable by a value between 1 percent and 20 percent.

23. The method of claim 14, wherein the coil current is modulated by the alternating variable by a value between 5 and 15 percent.

24. The method of claim 14, wherein the further variable is controlled with a sampling frequency of less than 1000 Hz.

25. The method of claim 14, wherein the further variable is controlled with a sampling frequency of less than less than 250 Hz.

26. The method of claim 14, wherein the impedance is determined from the electrical alternating variable and the further variable at the predetermined frequency according to a functional principle of a correlation amplifier and/or a lock-in-amplifier.

27. The method of claim 14, wherein the impedance is determined from the electrical alternating variable and the further variable at the predetermined frequency by a correlation-amplifier or lock-in-amplifier.

28. The method of claim 14, wherein the position of the movable element is determined as a function of at least one of a phase, an imaginary part, an absolute value and a real part of the impedance at the predetermined frequency.

29. The method of claim 14, wherein the determination of the impedance includes a low pass filtering.

30. The method of claim 14, wherein the low pass filtering is performed by a rectangular filter.

31. The method of claim 29, further comprising averaging a number of values in the block filter, said number being equal to an integer multiple of a quotient of a sampling frequency for the further variable and the predetermined frequency of the alternating voltage.

32. A linear actuator for a motor vehicle, said linear actuator comprising and electric coil; a movable element movable by a magnetic field of the electric coil; and a control unit configured to determine a position of the movable element as a function of a change of an impedance or an admittance of the coil, said control unit being configured to modulate a coil current supplied to the coil for moving and/or holding the movable element with an electrical alternating variable having a predetermined frequency; to determine the impedance or the admittance at the predetermined frequency by measuring a further variable at the predetermined frequency; and to determine the position of the movable element form the determined impedance or admittance.

33. A motor vehicle transmission, comprising: a linear actuator, said linear actuator comprising and electric coil; a movable element movable by a magnetic field of the electric coil; and a control unit configured to determine a position of the movable element as a function of a change of an impedance or an admittance of the coil, said control unit being configured to modulate a coil current supplied to the coil for moving and/or holding the movable element with an electrical alternating variable having a predetermined frequency; to determine the impedance or the admittance at the predetermined frequency by measuring a further variable at the predetermined frequency; and to determine the position of the movable element form the determined impedance or admittance.

34. A motor vehicle, comprising: a linear actuator, said linear actuator comprising and electric coil; a movable element movable by a magnetic field of the electric coil; and a control unit configured to determine a position of the movable element as a function of a change of an impedance or an admittance of the coil, said control unit being configured to modulate a coil current supplied to the coil for moving and/or holding the movable element with an electrical alternating variable having a predetermined frequency; to determine the impedance or the admittance at the predetermined frequency by measuring a further variable at the predetermined frequency; and to determine the position of the movable element form the determined impedance or admittance.

Description

[0020] Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained in more detail by way of schematic drawings.

[0021] It is shown in:

[0022] FIG. 1 a schematic sectional view of an exemplary embodiment of a linear actuator with an extended movable element;

[0023] FIG. 2 a schematic representation of the linear actuator of FIG. 1 with a retracted movable element, and

[0024] FIG. 3 a block diagram of a circuit which implements an exemplary embodiment of the method.

[0025] In the figures eh same or functionally similar elements are provided with the same reference signs.

[0026] FIG. 1 shows a sectional view of an exemplary embodiment of a linear actuator with an extended movable element. In the present case the linear actuator 1 is configured as a locking device. A movable element 2, in the resent case a locking element, is at least partially arranged in the interior of a coil 3. In the present case the locking element has the shape of a cylinder for example having two regions of different magnetic permeability and in the present case also different diameters. A first region 6 of the movable element 2, here with a smaller diameter, is made of a nonmagnetic material with a permeability m=1, and a second region 9 of the movable element 2, here with a greater diameter made of a magnetic material with a permeability m>1. In the shown example on both ends of the cylindrical coil 3 a respective first stop element 4 and a second stop element 5 are arranged. In the present case the movable element 2 is in contact with the first stop element 4 and protrudes over the first stop element with the first region 6. The protruding end region 6 of the movable element 2 can here be used for locking. A potentially required return spring is not shown for reasons of simplicity.

[0027] In the shown example the first stop element 4 extends outside about the coil and in regions into the interior of the coil 3, wherein in the shown arrangement the remaining interior space of the coil 3 is occupied by the movable element 2. Correspondingly, in the present case a magnetic circuit 7 extends in the interior of the coil 3 through the first stop element 4 and the second region 9 of the movable element 2. The impedance or inductivity of the coil 3 in this example is correspondingly determined at an extended movable element 2 by the materials of the first stop element 4 and the second region 9 of the movable element 2.

[0028] FIG. 2 shows a sectional view of the linear actuator shown in FIG. 1 with a retracted movable element. The first region 6 of the movable element now no longer protrudes over the first stop element 4 and the second region 9 of the movable element 2 is in engagement with the second stop element 5, which is here arranged on the coil side which is opposite the first stop element 4. Correspondingly an air gap or oil gap is now present at the inner side of the coil 3 between the first stop element 4 and the second region 9 of the movable element 2. This gap extends at least partially also in the region of the magnetic circuit 7 of the coil 3. Because the magnetic second region 9 of the movable element 2 no longer contacts the first stop element 4 the impedance or inductivity of the coil 3 is now no longer only influenced by the materials of the first stop element 4 and the movable element 2 but also by the air gap or oil gap 8, especially by its size dimensions. In the shown example a change of the impedance or inductivity of the coil 3 thus corresponds to a change of the position of the movable element 2 so that the position of the movable element 2 can be determined from a measured impedance or inductivity.

[0029] FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of an electronic circuit, which implements an exemplary embodiment of the method. The components indicated with solid lines correspond in this case to a known state of the art which was enhanced by the components shown in dashed lines and by corresponding process steps.

[0030] The components and processing steps shown in solid lines essentially form a standard control circuit. The a controller 10 which is for example configured as a PI-controller, receives as reference input variable the deviation from a setpoint coil current I.sub.S in the form of a reference signal, with which a magnetic field for moving and/or holding a movable element 2 (FIGS. 1 and 2) in a coil 3 is generated. In a further component 11 of the control circuit a disturbance variable, in this case the battery voltage U.sub.batt in the control circuit is compensated. In the present case thus a so-called forward correction is performed in the further component 11, in which also further processing steps can be performed. In the present embodiment between the coil 3, whose coil current is controlled by the control circuit, and the further component 11 a control component 12 is part of the control circuit, which control component impinges a coil current onto the coil 3 by means of a pulse width modulation via a mean voltage. The actual coil current I.sub.I, is fed back in the control circuit as control variable. In the present case this occurs by determining a voltage that is proportionate to the actual coil current which is tapped at a grounded measuring resistance 13 and subtracted via an addition component 18 from the reference signal of the control circuit.

[0031] For determining the position of the movable element a modulation depth of the pulse width modulation is modified in a further summing member 14 by means of an alternating voltage with a predetermined frequency, which further summing member is integrated in the control circuit between the further component 11 and the control component 12. The coil current is thus modulated as a result of the alternating voltage with the predetermined frequency. In the shown embodiment the determining of the voltage that is proportionate to the coil current is accomplished at the predetermined frequency, i.e., at 50 Hz, as described below according to the principle of the correlation amplifier:

[0032] The alternating voltage U.sub.50 is not only used to modify the modulation depth of the pulse width modulation but also to demodulate the voltage that is proportionate to the coil current at the predetermined frequency. For this purpose the alternating voltage U.sub.50 is in this example first shifted in a phase shifting component 15 by a predetermined phase, for example 45 degrees. Because the predetermined frequency is known the phase shifting component 15 can in this case be configured as a simple time delay element. In a mixing component 16, for example configured as a so-called mixer, the voltage that is proportionate to the actual coil voltage I is now demodulated with the phase-shifted alternating voltage U.sub.50 for example by multiplication. In the present case following the demodulation or the multiplication is a tow pass filtering in a filter component 17 which in the present case is configured as a simple block filter or rectangular filter or as so-called boxcar-filter. The number of measuring values over averaging is performed in the filter component 17 in the present case is 16. The number is thus selected because the sampling frequency or the time slice of the controller 10 in this example is 200 Hz and the predetermined frequency is 50 Hz and the choice of an integer multiple of the quotient of the sampling frequency and predetermined frequency for the number of the measuring values has the advantage that interfering leakage effects of the low pass filter are minimized. As a result the voltage that is proportionate to the actual coil current I.sub.I is determined at the predetermined frequency of the alternating voltage U.sub.50. This corresponds to determining the proportion U.sub.50 of the actual current I.sub.I that can be attributed to the impinged alternating voltage U.sub.50 and thus corresponds to determining the impedance of the coil 3 and the position of the movable element 2 (FIGS. 1 and 2). From the value of the proportionate voltage at the predetermined frequency, here 50 Hz, and with this the proportion I.sub.50 of the actual coil current I.sub.I the position of the movable element can thus be determined for example by comparison with a respective comparison value which then represents a known position of the movable element.