ANTI-ACNE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS

Abstract

The invention provides a pharmaceutical composition suitable for topical application. The pharmaceutical composition comprises an extract of Plectranthus aliciae and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The invention extends to provide a pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of acne, a pharmaceutical gel composition, a substance or composition comprising an extract of Plectranthus aliciae, a use of a Plectranthus aliciae extract, and various methods of preventing or treating acne.

Claims

1-92. (canceled)

93. A method of preventing or treating acne, comprising: topically applying a dose of Plectranthus aliciae extract, to a subject suffering from acne in the form of any one of both of acne vulgaris and juvenile, in which the acne includes any one or a combination of: comedones, whiteheads, blackheads, pustules and microcysts.

94. The method of preventing or treating acne as claimed in claim 93, in which the Plectranthus aliciae extract exhibits antibacterial activity against Cutibacterium acnes.

95. The method of preventing or treating acne, as claimed in claim 93, in which the dose is applied at least twice daily for at least 14 consecutive days, the dose comprises between 28 μg/ml and 1000 μg/ml Plectranthus aliciae extract.

96. The method of preventing or treating acne as claimed in claim 95, in which the dose comprises approximately 600 μg/ml Plectranthus aliciae extract.

97. The method of preventing or treating acne as claimed in claim 93, in which the dose is formulated in a pharmaceutical composition comprising the extract of Plectranthus aliciae and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier selected from cream, lotion, gel, ointment, oil, emulsion, serum, skin mask, face wash, toner, sunscreen and foundation.

98. A pharmaceutical composition suitable for topical application, which comprises an extract of Plectranthus aliciae in an effective amount for preventing or treating a skin condition in a subject, in which the skin condition is selected from acne, post inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) and combinations thereof; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier selected from cream, lotion, gel, ointment, oil, emulsion, serum, skin mask, face wash, toner, sunscreen and foundation.

99. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 98, in which the extract of Plectranthus aliciae is selected from an organic solvent-based extract of Plectranthus aliciae and a water-based extract of Plectranthus aliciae.

100. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 99, in which the organic solvent-based extract is an ethanol-based extract.

101. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 98, which comprises at least 28 μg/ml Plectranthus aliciae extract.

102. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 98, which comprises approximately 600 μg/ml Plectranthus aliciae extract

103. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 98, which includes any one or more of: a preservative, a surfactant, a gelling agent, a thickening agent, at least one antioxidant, water, an emulsifier, an emollient, a solubilizer, a humectant, a stabilizer, a chelating agent, at least one acidic and/or basic agent to adjust the pH of the pharmaceutical composition and a buffer.

104. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 98, in which the skin condition is acne and in which the pharmaceutical composition exhibits antibacterial activity towards Cutibacterium acnes.

105. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 98, which comprises at least 28 μg/ml Plectranthus aliciae.

106. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 98, which comprises at least one bioactive compound originating from the extract of Plectranthus aliciae, in which the at least one bioactive compound is in the form of luteolin and in which the luteolin constitutes at least 62.5 μg/ml of the pharmaceutical composition.

107. The pharmaceutical composition as claimed in claim 103, in which a pH of the pharmaceutical composition is in the range of 4.5 to 5.5.

108. A pharmaceutical gel composition which is suitable for topical application on a subject, which is effective to prevent or treat a skin condition in a subject in which the skin condition is selected from acne, post inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) and combinations thereof, the pharmaceutical gel composition comprises an extract of Plectranthus aliciae; at least one chelating agent; at least one thickening agent; at least one humectant; at least one additional additive; at least one basic substance to reach a predetermined pH; and water.

109. The pharmaceutical gel composition as claimed in claim 108, in which the extract of Plectranthus aliciae is selected from: an organic-solvent-based extract and a water-based extract.

110. The pharmaceutical gel composition as claimed in claim 109, in which the organic-solvent-based extract is in the form of an ethanolic extract.

111. The pharmaceutical gel composition as claimed in claim 110, which contains approximately 10% concentration of ethanolic extract of Plectranthus aliciae.

112. The pharmaceutical gel composition as claimed in claim 108, in which the at least one chelating agent is in the form of tetrasodium EDTA, the at least one humectant is in the form of propylene glycol, the at least one thickening agent is in the form of a carbomer, the at least one basic substance is in the form of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and the at least one additional additive is in the form of diazolidinyl urea, methylparaben, propylparaben and propylene glycol.

Description

EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

1. Introduction

[0124] Plectranthus aliciae, part of the Lamiaceae family, is widely known to be aromatic but has now shown good antibacterial activity towards the acne vulgaris-causing bacteria, Cutibacterium acnes, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 31.25 μg/ml. This MIC was comparable to that of the positive control, tetracycline (0.78 μg/ml). [0125] Noteworthy 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) antioxidant activity was observed for Plectranthus aliciae with a fifty percent inhibitory concentration (IC.sub.50) of 4.8±2.6 μg/ml, whereas the positive control, vitamin C, yielded an IC.sub.50 of 9.0±2.0 μg/ml. [0126] The IC.sub.50 for nitric oxide (NO) antioxidant activity was found to be 177.9±5.2 μg/ml, whilst vitamin C indicated an IC.sub.50 of 65.8±5.9 μg/ml. [0127] Plectranthus aliciae is considered non-toxic against B16-F10 mouse melanocytes cells (IC.sub.50 value of 82.2±1.5 μg/ml) and against the human keratinocyte cell line (HaCat, IC.sub.50 value of 101.8±2.8 μg/ml). [0128] An ethanolic extract of Plectranthus aliciae was active towards enzymes associated with inflammatory acne, the inhibition of the ethanolic extract on matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), lipase and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) was determined. Plectranthus aliciae inhibited MMP-9 at an IC.sub.50 value of 277.1±4.7 μg/ml, lipase at an IC.sub.50 value of 13.25±15.3 μg/ml and COX-2 at an IC.sub.50 value of 28.6±4.8 μg/ml. [0129] Plectranthus aliciae did not display any mutagenic effects in either TA 98 or TA 100 strains of Salmonella typhimurium and was concluded to be non-mutagenic. [0130] In vivo studies confirmed that the ethanolic extract is a non-irritant (0.47) when compared to a known irritant, sodium lauryl sulphate (2.01), after 72 hours. [0131] The ethanolic extract dissolved in 40% ethanol in a gel formulation was effective in reducing comedones, whiteheads, blackheads, pustules and microcysts, as compared to a placebo, after 14 to 28 days of consecutive use.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Collection and Preparation of Ethanolic Extract

[0132] The Plectranthus aliciae plant material was collected from the Manie van der Schijff Botanical Garden in the summer of March 2014, with the help of the garden curator. A herbarium specimen of Plectranthus aliciae was deposited in the H.G.W.J. Schweickerdt Herbarium under the herbarium number 122336. After collection, the plant material was freeze dried for approximately 1 week. All plant material selected was in leaf form. The dried leaves were ground, macerated in 99.9% ethanol (˜300 ml) and left on a shaker for 72 hours.

[0133] The filtrate of each plant was collected with the help of a Buchner funnel. Extracts were collected after the filtrate was subjected to reduced pressure using a Rotavapor. The ethanol was further evaporated by making use of the GeneVAc EZ-2 Series Personal Evaporator. The vials were stored at 5° C. until further use.

[0134] The percentage yield was determined as follows:

[00001]$\%\mathrm{Yield}=\frac{\mathrm{Final}\mathrm{weight}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{extract}}{\mathrm{Weight}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{initial}\mathrm{plant}\mathrm{material}}\times 100$

2.2. Liquid-Liquid Partitioning

[0135] The ethanolic extract (16.67 g) was re-dissolved in 350 ml of distilled water. The aqueous layer extract was suspended in different solvents and successively extracted three times in hexane (3×400 ml), ethyl acetate (3×300 ml) and n-BuOH (3×400 ml). To the ethyl acetate fraction, some saline water was added to separate the aqueous layer from the solvent layer. The fractions were dried and tested for their anti-bacterial potential.

2.3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

[0136] The ethanolic extract was sent for HPLC analysis and the standard curves of various pure compounds determined to measure the concentration of the respective compounds in the ethanolic extract. The compounds present at the highest concentration in the ethanolic extract were tested for their anti-bacterial potential.

2.4. Antibacterial Assay

[0137] The ethanolic extract of Plectranthus aliciae was tested against Cutibacterium acnes (ATCC 6919). The C. acnes bacteria was cultured from a Kwik-Stick on mouse heart and brain agar and then incubated at 37° C. for 72 hours under anaerobic conditions before the assay was done. The 72 hour old bacterial culture was dissolved in brain heart infusion broth and the suspension was adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard turbidity. This led to 10.sup.5-10.sup.6 colony forming units (CFU)/ml.

[0138] In a sterile 96-well plate, 100 μl of the samples from the stock solution that consisted of the plant extracts (2 mg/ml dissolved in 10% dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)) and tetracycline the positive control (0.2 mg/ml) was diluted with broth. Twofold serial dilutions were done in broth over a range to give the concentrations 500-3.9 μg/ml for the plant extract and 50-0.3 μg/ml for tetracycline. To all the wells of the 96-well plate, 100 μl of bacterial suspension was added. The solvent control wells contained 2.5% DMSO with bacterial suspension and no plant samples and the negative control, bacterial suspension with no plant samples.

[0139] The plates were incubated at 37° C. for 72 hours under anaerobic conditions. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value was determined by observing a colour change in the wells after the addition of 7-Hydroxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one 10-oxide, also known as Resazurin or Presto Blue (Sharma et al., 2014).

[0140] To determine the inhibition of biofilm growth, a bacterial suspension with an OD.sub.600 of 0.2 diluted 50 times was added to sterile 96-well plates together with the plant extract. The plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37° C. for 3 days. The ethanolic extract of Plectranthus aliciae was tested at a starting concentration of 500 μg/ml. Tetracycline was used as the positive control and tested at a concentration starting at 50 μg/ml. Crystal violet staining was performed first by removing the supernatant broth and fixing the attached bacterial biofilm with 200 μl of 99% methanol for 15 min. The plates were left to air dry and 200 μl of crystal violet (0.5%) was added to the plates and left for 20 min where after the plates were washed with distilled water and left to air dry. Acetic acid (33%) (220 μl) was added to the plates and was left on a shaker for 15 min. The samples were then transferred to clean 96-well plates. The absorbance was measured at 590 nm with the BIO-TEK power Wave XS multi-well plate reader (A.D.P., Weltevreden Park, South Africa). The fifty percent inhibitory concentration (IC50) value was determined by using Graph Pad Prism software.

2.5. Autoinducer-2 Inhibition Assay

[0141] To a sterile 96-well plate, 40 μl of bacterial supernatant treated with the ethanolic extract was transferred to each well. A working solution of 10 mM 1,10-phenanthroline/3.32 mM Fe(III) pH 2, was added to each well (40 μl) and the plates were incubated for 1 minute to develop to full colour. To each well, 120 μl of distilled water was added and the plates spun down at 14 000 rpm for 5 minutes. The absorbance was measured at 510 nm using a UVNis spectrophotometer.

2.6. DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay

[0142] The antioxidant activities of Plectranthus aliciae ethanolic extract was investigated using 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging assay as described by Mavundza (Mavundza, 2010).

[0143] To the top wells of a 96-well ELISA plate 200 μl of distilled water was added and to the remaining wells 110 μl of distilled water as a medium. Twenty microliters of plant extract and the controls was added to the first top wells that followed a double dilution. To each of the wells 90 μl of 90 μM DPPH ethanolic solution was added and left to incubate covered with aluminium foil for 30 minutes at room temperature. The final concentrations for the Plectranthus aliciae ethanolic extracts ranged from 3.9 to 500 μg/ml (Mavundza, 2010).

[0144] L-ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) at a concentration of 100 μg/ml, was used as the positive control and ethanol as the negative control, with distilled water as the blank. The radical scavenging capacities of the extracts were determined by using a BIO-TEK Power Wave Multiwell plate reader (A.D.P., Weltevreden Park, South Africa) at 515 nm using KC Junior software (Highland Park, Winooski, Vt., USA) to measure the disappearance of DPPH at 515 nm.

[0145] The radical scavenging activity was determined as a percentage DPPH radical-scavenging that was calculated by the following equation, where AC is the absorbance of the control solution that only contains DPPH and AS is the absorbance of the plant sample in DPPH solution:

% DPPH radical-scavenging=(AC−AS)/AC×100

[0146] From these results, the fifty percent inhibitory concentration (IC.sub.50) was determined (Mavundza, 2010). The IC.sub.50 value was determined using GraphPad Prism software (Version 4 Graph Pad Software, San Diego, Calif., USA) together with Windows Excel 2000.

2.7. NO Antioxidant Assay

[0147] The nitric oxide (NO) scavenging activity of the Plectranthus aliciae ethanolic extract was measured according to the method described by Mayur et al. (2010).

[0148] For the plant extracts in the top row of a 96-well plate, 20 μl of distilled water and 80 μl of extract was added and the samples were double diluted to a final concentration ranging from 2000 μg/ml to 15.6 μg/ml. A solution of 10 mM sodium nitroprusside (50 μl) was added to all the wells and incubated at room temperature under light for 90 minutes. Griess-llosysy's nitrite reagent (100 μl) was added to the test wells.

[0149] To the wells of the colour control, 100 μl of distilled water were added. The nitrite content was measured immediately at 546 nm. L-ascorbic acid was used as the positive control. The percentage scavenging activity was calculated as described for the DPPH assay.

2.8. Lipase Inhibition

[0150] A lipase inhibition assay was carried out as per U.S. patent method US2008/0317821 A1 with modifications. In brief, the total reaction volume contained tris buffer supplemented with NaCl and CaCl2/vehicle buffer/positive control/test sample at various concentrations, de-mineralized water, lipase enzyme and substrate (4-Methyl umbelliferyloleate).

[0151] The plate was mixed and the change in fluorescence was determined at an excitation of 360 nm and emission of 460 nm using FLUOstar Optima (BMG Labtech, Germany). The positive control (reference inhibitor) used in the assay was orlistat. A control reaction was run without the test sample. The mean of the relative fluorescence unit (RFU) of all samples tested was calculated.

[0152] From the mean values, percentage inhibition (% I) of samples were calculated using the equation:

% I=(RFU of Control−RFU of Sample)/(RFU of Control)×100

[0153] The IC.sub.50 was calculated by log probit analysis.

2.9. Cytotoxicity

2.9.1. Cell Culture

[0154] Mouse melanoma cells B16-F10 were cultured in complete Minimal Essential Eagle's Medium (MEM) containing 10% foetal bovine serum, 1.5 g/I NaHCO3, 10 μg/ml penicillin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.25 μg/ml fungi zone and 10 μg/ml streptomycin. The cultures were kept in a humidified atmosphere at 37° C. with 5% CO.sub.2. Every third to fourth day the cells were subcultured in a ratio of 1:3 (Momtaz et al., 2008).

2.9.2. Cell Counting

[0155] In a trypan blue solution, the cells were suspended in a 1:10 dilution (10 μl of cells in 90 μl of trypan blue solution). In the chambers of a hemacytometer, about 10 μl of this mixture was loaded, where after the cells were counted with a hand-held tally under a microscope.

[0156] The concentration of cells per ml was calculated as follows (Momtaz et al., 2008);

[00002]$\mathrm{Cell}\mathrm{no}.\left(\mathrm{cell}\mathrm{suspension}\right)=\mathrm{Cell}\mathrm{concentration}\times \mathrm{Volume}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{cell}\mathrm{suspended}$$\mathrm{Volume}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{cell}\mathrm{suspension}=\frac{\mathrm{Cell}\mathrm{concentration}\mathrm{wanted}\times \mathrm{Volume}\mathrm{wanted}}{\mathrm{Concentration}\mathrm{of}\mathrm{cells}\mathrm{in}\mathrm{suspension}}$

For example:

[00003]$\mathrm{Cell}\mathrm{number}\left(\mathrm{cell}\mathrm{suspension}\right)=150\mathrm{cells}\mathrm{counted}\times 10\times 10000=1500000\frac{\mathrm{cells}}{\mathrm{ml}}$

2.9.3. Cytotoxicity Test

[0157] In the wells of a 96-well plate, about 100 000 cells were plated in triplicate. To each of the wells 100 μl of the samples dilutions were added. The dilutions for the plant sample were done by dissolving 2 mg of plant extract in 100 μl of DMSO and diluting the sample in medium to make the final concentrations of 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25 and 3.13 μg/ml.

[0158] The negative control was DMSO and the positive control Actinomycin D that was tested at low concentrations. Actinomycin D was tested at a highest concentration of 0.5 μg/ml. A reference plate was prepared that contained the medium and sample with no cells, this was done in duplicate. The plates were incubated for 72 hours at 37° C. in 5% CO.sub.2, humidified atmosphere (Momtaz et al., 2008).

[0159] After incubation, 50 μl of 57XTT reagent (1 mg/ml XTT with 0.383 mg/ml PMS) was added to cells and further incubated for 3 hours. This resulted in a colour change and the optical densities were determined at a wavelength of 450 nm with the BIO-TEK power Wave XS multi-well plate reader (A.D.P., Weltevreden Park, South Africa). The concentration at which 50% of the cells were killed (IC.sub.50) value was calculated by using Graph Pad Prism software. Cell viability was determined by comparing the optical densities of samples with those of the negative control (Momtaz et al., 2008).

2.10. Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Assay

[0160] The assay was performed according to a procedure described by Landa et al. (2014) with human recombinant COX-2. The COX-2 (0.5 unit/reaction) was mixed with 100 mM TRIS buffer with a pH of 8.0 (180 μl) and a cofactor solution of 18 mM L-epinephrine, 5 μM porcine hematin and 50 μM Na.sub.2EDTA. The plant samples that were dissolved in DMSO (10 μL) or pure DMSO (in the case of blank wells) were added to the wells of the 96-well plate. The plate was then incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature and the reaction initiated with the addition of 10 μM arachidonic acid (5 μl) incubated at 37° C. for 20 min. The reaction was stopped with the addition of 10 μl of 10% formic acid. The samples were diluted 1:15 and the PGE2 quantification achieved by the PGE2 ELISA kit. The absorbance was measured using a BIO-TEK Power Wave Multiwell plate reader (A.D.P., Weltevreden Park, South Africa) at 515 nm using KC Junior software (Highland Park, Winooski, Vt., USA).

2.11. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Assay

[0161] The MMP-9 Colorimetric Drug Discovery Kit (BML-AK410) from Enzo Life Sciences was used. The experiment was carried out as described in the instruction manual. The MMP chromogenic substrate (Ac-PLG-[2-mercapto-4-methyl-pentanoyl]-LG-OC2H5) and the inhibitor N-Isobutyl-N-(4-methoxyphenylsulfonyl)glycyl hydroxamic acid (NNGH) was thawed to room temperature. The inhibitor was diluted 1/200 in assay buffer (50 mM HEPES, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.05% Brij-35, 1 mM DTNB, pH 7.5) and warmed until 37° C. The substrate was diluted 1/25 in assay buffer to the required volume. The MMP-9 enzyme was diluted in assay buffer to 1/60 and warmed until 37° C. just before the assay. The plant extract was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to a starting concentration of 2 mg/ml.

[0162] In the plant extract wells, 50 μl of plant extract and 90 μl of buffer was added to the first well of the 96 well plate (1/2 volume). To the rest of the plant extract wells, 70 μl of buffer was added and the plant extracts serially diluted. Assay buffer was plated in the rest of the relevant wells as follows: blank 90 μl, control 70 μl, and NNGH 50 μl. The microplate was then incubated and allowed to equilibrate to the assay temperature (37° C.). The diluted MMP-9 enzyme (20 μl) was then added to the control, NNGH and plant extract wells. To the NNGH inhibitor wells, 20 μl of NNGH inhibitor was added. The plate was then incubated for 45 minutes at 37° C. The reaction was started with the addition of 10 μl of the diluted substrate. The plates were continuously read at A.sub.412nm by using a BIO-TEK Power Wave Multiwell plate reader (A.D.P., Weltevreden Park, South Africa) at one (1) minute intervals for twenty (20) minutes using KC Junior software (Highland Park, Winooski, Vermont, USA).

2.12. Mutagenicity

[0163] The Salmonella microsome assay according to Maron and Ames (1983) and modified by Mortelmans and Zeiger (2000) was used to determine the genotoxicity of selected extracts. Two Salmonella typhimurium tester strains, TA98 and TA100, were used for the assay, which was done without metabolic activation. Briefly, stock bacterial cultures (100 μl) incubated in nutrient broth No. 2 at 37° C. for 16 h were added (100 μl) to test samples (100 μl) followed by 500 μl of phosphate buffer saline and 2 ml of top agar (2 ml) containing biotin/histidine (0.5 mM). A positive control, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) at a concentration of 2 μg/ml was used, and two negative controls, sterile distilled water and 10% DMSO, were also used. The mixture was vortexed, and poured on minimal agar plates and incubated for 48 h at 37° C. All samples were tested in triplicate. The absence or presence of toxicity was examined by observing the background bacterial growth.

[0164] The mutagenicity of the plant extract was determined according to the assay of Maron and Ames (1983) with slight modifications as by Mortelmans and Zeiger (2000). Two Salmonella typhimurium tester strains, TA98 and TA100, were used for the assay, which was done without metabolic activation. Stock bacterial cultures incubated in nutrient broth No. 2 at 37° C. for 16 h were added (100 μl) to the test sample (100 μl) followed by 500 μl of phosphate buffer saline and 2 ml of top agar (2 ml) containing biotin/histidine (0.5 mM). Here 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) was used as the positive control at a concentration of 2 μg/ml, and two negative controls, 10% DMSO and sterile distilled water, were also used. After preparation, the samples were poured on minimal agar plates and incubated for 48 h at 37° C. The absence or presence of toxicity was examined by observing the background bacterial growth. All samples were tested in triplicate.

2.13. In Vivo Skin Irritancy Patch Test

[0165] Twenty adult female volunteers were used, of whom five had sensitive skin. Signed consent forms were obtained from all subjects. Controls and products were applied to the inner forearm of each volunteer in a randomized blinded pattern at zero hours and repeated on the same position at 24 hours. Product(s) were tested by using specially designed aluminium Finn Chambers on Scanpore® tape for occluded sites or modified Hilltop chambers for un-occluded sites. Products were tested neat.

[0166] The test sites were observed at 0 and 24 hours after application. Test sites were covered with the chambers for the first 2×23 hours, thereafter the chambers were removed. The protocol uses 1% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) solution as a positive control and de-ionised water as a negative control. Colour assessments were performed in a “double blind” manner in 2 ways: visual score and an instrumental score using the Minolta Cr400 Chromameter using the a* value, which measures colour on the red/green axis.

2.14. In Vivo Anti-Acne Clinical Studies

[0167] Plectranthus aliciae (300 mg/ml) dissolved in 40% ethanol was formulated at 10% in a gel formulation. Acne clinical studies were conducted as follows. A group of twenty-four (24) subjects between the ages of 19 to 39 were included and completed the full study. The subjects complied with the rules and specifications of the study and all results recorded were used in the noted calculations. The procedure of testing was explained to them verbally and with the consent form and medical history were signed by each subject. Personal details and each subject's assessment of their own skin type were recorded. Colour photographs were taken at each time interval to serve as a recording of the study conducted.

[0168] All subjects were instructed to rest for twenty (20) minutes before any testing was conducted. The designated left or right side of the face was cleansed with a standard eye make-up remover and allowed to air dry for three (3) minutes. The temperature and relative humidity were recorded during the time of the study. The test sites were demarcated as per test sequence substance. Two (2) trained evaluators performed a physical count on both test sites and recorded the scores. An operator trained the test subjects in applying the test products evenly to the test sites, twice a day. Subjects were restricted from using any topical products or any medication not approved by the study sponsor for the duration of the study. Subjects returned to the testing facility on fourteen (D14) and twenty-eight (D28) days respectively after baseline readings. The temperature and relative humidity were recorded during the time of the study. The primary objective sensory evaluation results were scored and rated by two (2) trained evaluators. Both inflammatory and retentional elements of acne were counted.

[0169] Objective:

[0170] The objective of the study was to determine the Acne Reduction efficacy of a test product on the face of human subjects.

[0171] Materials:

[0172] Standard Eye Make-up Remover; Sterile Cotton makeup remover pads, White Facial Tissue; and Alcohol swabs.

[0173] Camera:

[0174] VISIO FACE

[0175] Testing Conditions:

[0176] The study was carried out at an average ambient range temperature 20.5° C. to 22.8° C. with a relative humidity of 41.0% RH and 46.7% RH.

[0177] Method:

[0178] A group of twenty-four (24) subjects between the ages of 19 to 39 were included and completed the full study. A couple of deviations were observed during the study).

[0179] The subjects complied with the rules and specifications of the study and all results recorded were used in the noted calculations.

[0180] The procedure of testing was explained to them verbally and with the consent form and medical history were signed by each subject. Personal details and each subject's assessment of their own skin type were recorded.

[0181] Colour photographs were taken at each time interval to serve as a recording of the study conducted.

[0182] All subjects were instructed to rest for twenty (20) minutes before any testing was conducted.

[0183] The designated left or right side of the face was cleansed with a standard eye make-up remover and allowed to air dry for three (3) minutes.

[0184] The temperature and relative humidity were recorded during the time of the study.

[0185] The test sites were demarcated as per test sequence substance.

[0186] Two (2) trained evaluators performed a physical count on both test sites and recorded the scores.

[0187] An operator trained the test subjects in applying the test products evenly to the test sites, according to the test substance sequence.

[0188] Subjects were restricted from using any topical products or any medication not approved by the study sponsor for the duration of the study.

[0189] Subjects returned to the testing facility on twenty-eight (D28) days respectively after baseline readings.

[0190] The temperature and relative humidity were recorded during the time of the study.

[0191] Research Design:

[0192] Sensory: Objective (Physical Count)

[0193] The primary objective sensory evaluation results were scored and rated by two (2) trained evaluators. Both inflammatory and retentional elements of acne were counted.

[0194] A research design can be defined as the basic plan that guides the data collection and analysis phases of the research project. It is the framework that specifies the type of information to be collected, the sources of data, and the data collection procedure. The information needed to reach the aim of the current study is based on values that represent the Acne Reduction characteristics of human subjects and can thus be classified as interval data, since the quantitative data can be represented in a quantitative manner.

[0195] Data Sampling:

[0196] A sample can be defined as a subset of the whole population which is actually investigated by a researcher and whose characteristics will be generalised to the entire population. A sampling plan can be described as a design, scheme of action or procedure that specifies how the participants are to be selected in a survey study. A distinction is made between probability and non-probability sampling. In this study use was made of a non-probability sampling method. A non-probability sampling method can be described as the selection of a population element to be part of the sample based in some part on the judgment of the researcher. The researcher only included respondents who were 19-39 years of age. A sample of convenience was used in this study.

[0197] Statistical Data Analysis Procedure

[0198] Data Analysis:

[0199] The data was captured onto Excel and converted to extended excel statistical tests in order to do the analysis. The data analysis had the following aims: [0200] 1. To first determine whether the data was distributed normally. [0201] 2. To determine whether significant differences existed between the test product and placebo regarding the Acne Reduction efficacy.

[0202] Since the sample was relatively small and consisted of a group of at least twenty-four (24) respondents, use was made of a parametric test, the (unequal or equal variances) t-test for comparison of two sets of data. The t-test is used to determine whether a given treatment had a significant effect on a population. In the case of not normally distributed data the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was be used.

[0203] The following statistical data analysis procedures were used: [0204] Descriptive Analysis: Descriptive statistics are primarily aimed at describing the data. [0205] Inferential statistics: Test hypotheses about differences in populations on the basis of measurements made on samples of subjects.

[0206] Statistically significant differences between variables are indicated by a significance value p. If the value of p is equal to or less than 0.05, it gives an indication that there is a statistically significant difference, at the 5% level of confidence.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Identification of Pure Compounds

[0207] The following pure compounds were identified to be present in the ethanolic extract of Plectranthus aliciae: Vitexin, Isovitexin, Luteolin, Quercitrin, Vannilic acid, Syringic acid, Caffeic acid, Epicatechin, Ferulic acid, Propyl gallate, Catechin, Rosmarinic acid, Isoquesrcitrin, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, Protocatechuic acid and Orientin. Luteolin, Quercitrin, Syringic acid and Rosmarinic acid were identified to be the major constituents in the ethanolic extract and were tested for their antibacterial potential. To the best of the inventors' knowledge, this is the first report of Luteolin, Syringic acid and Quercitrin identified to be present in the ethanolic extract of P. aliciae.

3.2. Antibacterial, DPPH Radical Scavenging and NO Antioxidant Assays, Cytotoxicity

[0208] The antibacterial activity of the ethanolic extract of Plectranthus aliciae is summarized in FIG. 1. The antibacterial activity of the ethanolic extract of Plectranthus aliciae, semi-pure fractions and identified pure compounds is summarized in FIG. 2. To the best of the inventors knowledge, the antibacterial activity of P. aliciae against C. acnes is being reported for the first time in this embodiment. The ethanolic extract of P. aliciae inhibited bacterial growth of C. acnes and exhibited a noteworthy MIC value of 31.25 μg/ml, which is comparable to the MIC value of the positive control, tetracycline, with a MIC value of 0.78 μg/ml. The hexane fraction exhibited a noteworthy MIC value of 7.8 μg/ml and the pure compound Luteolin with an MIC value of 62.5 μg/ml.

[0209] Plectranthus aliciae was confirmed to inhibit biofilm formation at a fifty percent inhibitory concentration (IC.sub.50) of 28.5±3.4 μg/ml and autoinducer-2 production at 32.3±13.1 μg/ml.

[0210] Plectranthus aliciae was confirmed to have a noteworthy general DPPH antioxidant activity indicated by an IC.sub.50 value of 4.8±2.6 μg/ml that was significantly different from vitamin C with an IC.sub.50 value of 9.0±2.0 μg/ml.

[0211] Moderate NO antioxidant activity was observed for the P. aliciae ethanolic extract with an IC.sub.50 value of 177.9±5.2 μg/ml.

[0212] For an extract to be considered toxic an IC.sub.50 value below 100 μg/ml needs to be obtained. The positive control, Actinomycin D, is known to be cytotoxic and showed a low IC.sub.50 of 10.960±414.11 μg/ml. Plectranthus aliciae had an IC.sub.50 of 101.8±2.8 μg/ml and is considered to be non-toxic against human keratinocyte cells (HaCat).

3.3. Lipase Inhibition

[0213] Plectranthus aliciae exhibited in vitro lipase inhibitory activity in a dose dependent manner in the concentration range tested. Specifically, P. aliciae inhibited in vitro lipase activity with an IC.sub.50 of 21.66 μg/ml, as shown in FIG. 3.

3.4. Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition

[0214] Plectranthus aliciae inhibited the COX-2 enzyme at an IC.sub.50 of 28.6±4.6 μg/ml compared to the positive control Ibuprofen with an IC.sub.50 at 0.09±0.04 μg/ml (see FIG. 4).

[0215] Previous studies done by Scheckel et al., (2008) reported that rosmarinic acid at 3.6 μg/ml reduced COX-2 protein levels in HT-29 cells to levels comparable to that of the control cells. The noteworthy COX-2 inhibitory activity of P. aliciae observed in the present study could be due to rosmarinic acid that known to be present in species of the Lamiaceae family. Rosmarinic acid has been reported to have anti-inflammatory activity that is comparable to Ibuprofen (Javanmardi et al., 2002).

3.5. Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Inhibition

[0216] Referring specifically to FIG. 5, Plectranthus aliciae was found to moderately inhibit the MMP-9 enzyme. The positive control was only tested at one concentration and inhibited MMP-9 by 96% at a concentration of 0.411 μg/ml. The positive control was used as a reference to verify if the assay was successful.

[0217] No previous studies have evaluated the MMP-9 inhibition activity of P. aliciae. The results obtained in the current study are comparable to the MMP-9 inhibition activity seen for tetracycline. Previous studies done by Kendre et al. (2013) found tetracycline to inhibit 38.91% of the MMP-9 enzyme at a concentration of 100 μg/ml. The moderate activity seen for P. aliciae on the MMP-9 enzyme could be similar to the mechanism at which tetracycline inhibits the enzyme. Plectranthus aliciae is known to contain a high concentration of rosmarinic acid that has the ability to oxidise iron and could, therefore, disrupt the conformation and hydrolytic activity of the enzyme (Fujimoto et al., 2010).

3.6. Mutagenicity

[0218] The ethanolic extract of P. aliciae was applied to two different strains of bacteria according to the number of colonies. According to the results obtained, P. aliciae did not display any mutagenic effects in either TA 98 or TA 100 strains of S. typhimurium (see FIG. 6). Plectranthus aliciae did not display a ratio of 2 or higher in terms of revertants. The number of colonies observed may have been affected by the possibility that P. aliciae has anti-bacterial properties.

3.7. In Vivo Skin Irritancy Patch Test and Anti-Acne Clinical Studies

[0219] Results:

[0220] Descriptive Analysis:

[0221] Descriptive Analysis entails the ordering and summarising of data by means of tabulation and the calculation of descriptive measures.

[0222] Interferential Statistics:

[0223] Statistical Inference draws conclusions about the population from which the sample was drawn by using descriptive measures that has been calculated.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE A Comparison of objective sensory (physical count, PUSTULES) values for P. aliciae in a gel (FCAG014/5936) compared to the placebo gel (FCAG014/5937) test sites: Mean (±Standard Deviation) Time FCAG014/ Table FCAG014/ Table (Diff) Table Interval 5936 Ref. 5937 Ref. p-Value Ref. BASELINE 0.08 F1 0.04 F2 0.000* G1 (±0.35) (±0.20) D 14 − 0.04 F1 −0.02 F2 0.020 G2 BASELINE (±0.29) (±0.25) D 28 − −0.06 F1 0.00 F2 0.013 G3 BASELINE (±0.24) (±0.29)

[0224] Conclusion: Objective Sensory (Physical Count, PUSTULES)

[0225] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to compare the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites at baseline (thus before application of test products) and there was a statistical significant difference was found between the two test sites on a 5% level of confidence. Test product P. aliciae in a gel formulation (FCAG014/5936) tested significantly higher than the placebo gel control (FCAG014/5937).

[0226] *This is of no significance to test product efficacy

[0227] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day fourteen (D14) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly higher than control FCAG014/5937.

[0228] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day twenty-eight (D28) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0229] It can therefore be concluded that the product FCAG014/5936 was only effective in reducing the number of pustules; after twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use; when compared to the placebo control FCAG014/5937.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE B Comparison of objective sensory (physical count, PAPULES) values for P. aliciae in a gel (FCAG014/5936) compared to the placebo gel (FCAG014/5937) test sites: Mean (±Standard Deviation) Time FCAG014/ Table FCAG014/ Table (Diff) Table Interval 5936 Ref. 5937 Ref. p-Value Ref. BASELINE 12.85 F3 12.50 F4 *0.008 G4 (±17.31) (±13.12) D 14 − −2.81 F3 −2.23 F4 0.337 G5 BASELINE (±8.67) (±8.07) D 28 − −3.65 F3 −3.67 F4 0.496 G6 BASELINE (±12.08) (±12.97)

[0230] Conclusion: Objective Sensory (Physical Count, PAPULES)

[0231] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to compare the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites at baseline (thus before application of test products) and a statistical significant difference was found between the two test sites on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly higher than control FCAG014/5937.

[0232] *This is of no significance to test product efficacy

[0233] A t-Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day fourteen (D14) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was no statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0234] A t-Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day twenty-eight (D28) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was no statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly higher than control FCAG014/5937.

[0235] It can therefore not be concluded that the product FCAG014/5936 was not effective in reducing the number of papules; after twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use twice a day; when compared to the placebo control FCAG014/5937.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparison of objective sensory (physical count, WHITEHEADS) values for P. aliciae in a gel (FCAG014/5936) compared to the placebo gel (FCAG014/5937) test sites: Mean (±Standard Deviation) Time FCAG014/ Table FCAG014/ Table (Diff) Table Interval 5936 Ref. 5937 Ref. p-Value Ref. BASELINE 8.29 F5 7.79 F6 *0.000 G7 (±8.98) (±8.89) D 14 − −1.88 F5 0.85 F6 0.007 G8 BASELINE (±7.63) (±6.13) D 28 − −4.13 F5 −1.31 F6 <0.001 G9 BASELINE (±7.03) (±7.84)

[0236] Conclusions: Objective Sensory (Physical Count, WHITEHEADS)

[0237] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to compare the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites at baseline (thus before application of test products) and already a statistical significant difference was found between the two test sites on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly higher than control FCAG014/5937.

[0238] *This is of no significance to test product efficacy

[0239] A t-Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day fourteen (D14) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0240] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day twenty-eight (D28) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0241] It can therefore be concluded that the product FCAG014/5936 was effective in reducing the number of whiteheads; after fourteen (14) to twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use; when compared to the placebo control FCAG014/5937.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Comparison of objective sensory (physical count, COMEDONES) values for P. aliciae in a gel (FCAG014/5936) compared to the placebo gel (FCAG014/5937) test sites: Mean (±Standard Deviation) Time FCAG014/ Table FCAG014/ Table (Diff) Table Interval 5936 Ref. 5937 Ref. p-Value Ref. BASELINE 1.19 F7 1.08 F8 *0.000 G10 (±1.95) (±1.27) D 14 − −0.52 F7 −0.19 F8 <0.001 G11 BASELINE (±1.65) (±1.25) D 28 − −0.63 F7 −0.67 F8 0.453 G12 BASELINE (±2.00) (±1.21)

[0242] Conclusion: Objective Sensory (Physical Count, COMEDONES)

[0243] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to compare the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites at baseline (thus before application of test products) and already a statistical significant difference was found between the two test sites on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly higher than control FCAG014/5937.

[0244] *This is of no significance to test product efficacy.

[0245] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day fourteen (D14) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0246] A t-Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day twenty-eight (D28) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was no statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence.

[0247] It can therefore be concluded that the product FCAG014/5936 was only effective in reducing the number of comedones; after fourteen (14) days of consecutive use; when compared to the placebo control FCAG014/5937.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Comparison of objective sensory (physical count, BLACKHEADS) values for P. aliciae in a gel (FCAG014/5936) compared to the placebo gel (FCAG014/5937) test sites: Mean (±Standard Deviation) Time FCAG014/ Table FCAG014/ Table (Diff) Table Interval 5936 Ref. 5937 Ref. p-Value Ref. BASELINE 3.44 F9 3.04 F10 *0.000 G13 (±4.63) (±4.69) D 14 − −0.65 F9 −0.06 F10 <0.001 G14 BASELINE (±2.74) (±4.73) D 28 − −1.25 F9 −0.35 F10 <0.001 G15 BASELINE (±3.34) (+3.09)

[0248] Conclusions: Objective Sensory (Physical Count, BLACKHEADS)

[0249] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to compare the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites at baseline (thus before application of test products) and already a statistical significant difference was found between the two test sites on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly higher than control FCAG014/5937.

[0250] *This is of no significance to test product efficacy.

[0251] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day fourteen (D14) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0252] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day twenty-eight (D28) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0253] It can therefore be concluded that the product FCAG014/5936 was effective in reducing the number of blackheads; after fourteen (14) twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use; when compared to the placebo control FCAG014/5937.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Comparison of objective sensory (physical count, MICROCYSTS) values for P. aliciae in a gel (FCAG014/5936) compared to the placebo gel (FCAG014/5937) test sites: Mean (±Standard Deviation) Time FCAG014/ Table FCAG014/ Table (Diff) Table Interval 5936 Ref. 5937 Ref. p-Value Ref. BASELINE 0.23 F11 0.08 F12 *0.000 G16 (±0.69) (±0.35) D 14 − −0.10 F11 0.00 F12 0.010 G17 BASELINE (±0.59) (+0.21) D 28 − −0.08 F11 −0.02 F12 0.013 G18 BASELINE (±0.61) (±0.33)

[0254] Conclusions: Objective Sensory (Physical Count, MICROCYSTS)

[0255] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to compare the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites at baseline (thus before application of test products) and already a statistical significant difference was found between the two test sites on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly higher than control FCAG014/5937.

[0256] *This is of no significance to test product efficacy.

[0257] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day fourteen (D14) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0258] A Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum Test was performed to determine the treatment effect by comparing the average difference values at day twenty-eight (D28) of the test product treated and the placebo control treated sites and there was a statistical significance difference on a 5% level of confidence. Test product FCAG014/5936 tested significantly lower than control FCAG014/5937.

[0259] It can therefore be concluded that the product FCAG014/5936 was effective in reducing the number of microcyst; after fourteen (14) to twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use; when compared to the placebo control FCAG014/5937.

[0260] Plectranthus aliciae was found to be a non-irritant after 24 hours compared to the positive control sodium lauryl sulphate. Plectranthus aliciae displayed a mean visual score of 0.47 compared to the positive control of 2.01.

[0261] The results for the acne clinical studies for P. aliciae are summarised as follows: [0262] The active gel formulation was effective in reducing the number of pustules after twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use when compared to the placebo control. [0263] The active gel formulation was effective in reducing the number of whiteheads; after fourteen (14) to twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use when compared to the placebo control. [0264] The active gel formulation was effective in reducing the number of comedones after fourteen (14) days of consecutive use when compared to the placebo control. [0265] The active gel formulation was effective in reducing the number of blackheads after fourteen (14) twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use when compared to the placebo control. [0266] The active gel formulation was effective in reducing the number of microcyst after fourteen (14) to twenty-eight (28) days of consecutive use when compared to the placebo control.

4. Conclusion

[0267] Plectranthus aliciae has not yet been identified in vitro to have antibacterial activity. In this study, P. aliciae has shown great potential for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Specifically, in antimicrobial studies, P. aliciae has shown promising microbial inhibition towards the acne causing bacteria, C. acnes.

[0268] Free radicals are produced during inflammatory acne. These free radicals contribute to inflammation and cause cell damage. Good antioxidant activity was observed for P. aliciae against the free radicals DPPH and NO. This could contribute in preventing inflammatory acne that could result in PIH.

[0269] Plectranthus aliciae has also shown to be non-toxic towards mouse melanocytes, human keratinocytes and was found to be non-mutagenic and can therefore be considered safe to use on skin.

[0270] The ethanolic extract of P. aliciae was active towards enzymes associated with inflammatory acne. More specifically, the inhibition of the ethanolic extract on matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), lipase and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) was confirmed in vitro.

[0271] In vivo studies confirmed that the neat ethanolic extract is a non-irritant. Acne clinical studies on a 10% gel formulation were found to be effective for various forms of acne vulgaris after fourteen to twenty-eight days of consecutive use twice a day.

[0272] In light of the foregoing, the ethanolic extract of Plectranthus aliciae has shown significant potential in the cosmetic field as an alternative, anti-acne application.

[0273] The inventor thus believes that the invention addresses the drawbacks of existing therapies for acne and PIH, by providing a novel medicament and associated therapy which is derived from nature, is organic and which reduces the negative side effects experienced by patients. The novel medicament provided is also simple and cost-effective to manufacture and the associated therapy is simple in technique.