Method for removing scales in steam generation facility

Abstract

Provided is a method for removing a scale in a steam generation facility, whereby it becomes possible to remove a scale deposited on the inside of a boiler vessel during the operation of a boiler without causing corrosion of the boiler. A method for removing a scale in a steam generation facility is disclosed, wherein in the steam generation facility, a pH of boiler water is adjusted to 11.3 or more, and a polyacrylic acid having a weight average molecular weight that is 0.50 to 2.00 times a reference weight average molecular weight as calculated from the following calculation formula (1), or a salt thereof, is added in accordance with the pH value of the boiler water during the operation of a boiler, thereby removing a scale deposited on the inside of a boiler vessel:
Reference weight average molecular weight=−8462×{(pH value)−11.3}+61538  (1).

Claims

1. A method for removing scale in a steam generation facility having a boiler, comprising: adjusting a pH of boiler water to 11.3 or more during operation of the boiler, selecting a polyacrylic acid having a weight average molecular weight that is 0.50 to 2.00 times a reference weight average molecular weight as calculated from formula (1), or a salt thereof, and adding the polyacrylic acid or the salt thereof selected to a boiler water, thereby removing a scale deposited on an inside of a boiler vessel of the boiler, wherein
the reference weight average molecular weight=−8462×{(pH value)−11.3}+61538  Formula (1).

2. A method for removing scale in a steam generation facility having a boiler, comprising: adjusting a pH of boiler water to 11.3 or more during operation of the boiler, selecting a polyacrylic acid having a weight average molecular weight that is 0.50 to 2.00 times a reference weight average molecular weight as calculated by a calculation method of the reference weight average molecular weight, or a salt thereof, and adding the polyacrylic acid or the salt thereof selected to a boiler water, thereby removing a scale deposited on an inside of a boiler vessel of the boiler, wherein the calculation method of the reference weight average molecular weight includes (1) in at least three pH values at a pH of 11.3 or more, measuring a weight average molecular weight (Mw.sub.max) of the polyacrylic acid at which a scale removal rate becomes maximum; and (2) determining a relation formula between pH and Mw.sub.max by the least squares method while defining the pH as the x-axis and the Mw.sub.max as the y-axis, respectively, and defining a weight average molecular weight at each pH obtained from the relation formula as the reference weight average molecular weight.

3. The method for removing scale in a steam generation facility according to claim 1, wherein the polyacrylic acid or its salt is added such that an initial concentration thereof in the boiler water is 10 to 500 mg/L.

4. The method for removing scale in a steam generation facility according to claim 2, wherein the polyacrylic acid or its salt is added such that an initial concentration thereof in the boiler water is 10 to 500 mg/L.

5. The method for removing scale in a steam generation facility according to claim 1, further comprising adding polymethacrylic acid to the steam generation facility to prevent the scale, wherein a concentration of the polymethacrylic acid in the boiler water is 10 to 500 mg/L, a mass ratio of the polyacrylic acid or the salt thereof to the polymethacrylic acid in the boiler water is 1/50 to 50/1, and a weight average molecular weight of the polymethacrylic acid is 5,000 to 60,000.

6. The method for removing scale in a steam generation facility according to claim 2, further comprising adding polymethacrylic acid to the steam generation facility to prevent the scale, wherein a concentration of the polymethacrylic acid in the boiler water is 10 to 500 mg/L, a mass ratio of the polyacrylic acid or the salt thereof to the polymethacrylic acid in the boiler water is 1/50 to 50/1, and a weight average molecular weight of the polymethacrylic acid is 5,000 to 60,000.

7. The method for removing scale in a steam generation facility according to claim 1, wherein the polyacrylic acid is a homopolymer of acrylic acid.

8. The method for removing scale in a steam generation facility according to claim 2, wherein the polyacrylic acid is a homopolymer of acrylic acid.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a view showing an embodiment of a steam generation facility for carrying out the present invention.

(2) FIG. 2 is a graph showing a relation between a weight average molecular weight of a polyacrylic acid and a scale removal rate in a pH region of from 11.1 to 12.0.

(3) FIG. 3 is a graph showing a relation between a pH and a weight average molecular weight of a polyacrylic acid that is optimum for the scale removal in a pH region of from 11.1 to 12.0.

(4) FIG. 4 is a graph of a relation between a pH and a weight average molecular weight of a polyacrylic acid that is optimum for the scale removal in a pH region of from 11.3 to 12.0 by the least squares method.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(5) A method for removing a scale in a steam generation facility according to the present invention is a method in which in the steam generation facility, a pH of boiler water is adjusted to 11.3 or more, and a polyacrylic acid having a weight average molecular weight that is 0.50 to 2.00 times a reference weight average molecular weight as calculated from the following calculation formula (1), or a salt thereof, is added in accordance with the pH value of the boiler water during the operation of a boiler, thereby removing a scale deposited on the inside of a boiler vessel:
Reference weight average molecular weight=−8462×{(pH value)−11.3}+61538  (1).

(6) FIG. 1 is a view showing an embodiment of a steam generation facility for carrying out the present invention.

(7) FIG. 1 shows a circulation-type steam generation facility 7 including a steam condensate tank 1, a steam condensate line 11, a makeup water tank 2, a makeup water line 21, a feed-water tank 3, a feed-water line 31, a means 4 for adding a polyacrylic acid or its salt, a means 5 for adding an alkali, a steam generation portion (boiler vessel) 6, and a drain recovery line 61.

(8) It should be noted that though FIG. 1 shows the circulation-type steam generation facility, the scale removal method of the present invention is also applicable to a once-through steam generation facility.

(9) <Adjustment of pH>

(10) In the method for removing a scale in a steam generation facility according to the present invention, a pH of the boiler water is first adjusted to 11.3 or more.

(11) FIG. 2 is a graph showing a relation between a weight average molecular weight of a polyacrylic acid and a scale removal rate in a pH region of from 11.1 to 12.0. As shown in FIG. 2, as the pH becomes high, the scale removal rate becomes high. In particular, it is perceived that there is a drastic difference in a pH region of from 11.1 to 11.3. It should be noted that FIG. 2 is based on the results of Test Example 1 as described later.

(12) In this way, according to the present invention, by controlling the pH of the boiler water to 11.3 or more, a removal rate of the scale generated in the inside of the boiler vessel can be made favorable. As for the scale deposition onto the inside of the boiler vessel, the case where only a single component deposition is less, but in many cases, the scale is a mixture of multiple components inclusive of calcium, magnesium, silica, and the like. Here, when the pH rises to 11.3 or more, the solubility of silica in the generated scale mixture increases, and therefore, it may be considered that the scale mixture derived from calcium or magnesium is apt to be removed simultaneously.

(13) The pH of the boiler water is preferably 11.5 or more from the viewpoint of a scale removal rate, whereas it is preferably 12.0 or more from the viewpoint of corrosion inhibition of the inside of the boiler vessel or the inside of the steam generation facility system.

(14) In order to adjust the pH of the boiler water to 11.3 or more, there are exemplified a method of adding an alkaline agent, a method of adjusting a blow-down rate and/or a supply rate of feed-water to adjust a concentration cycles, and the like. A method of adding an alkaline agent is suitable from the viewpoint of easiness of the pH adjustment.

(15) Examples of the alkaline agent include an alkali metal hydroxide, an alkali metal carbonate, an alkali metal phosphate, a neutral amine, and the like.

(16) Examples of the alkali metal hydroxides include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, lithium hydroxide, and the like; examples of the alkali metal carbonates include sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, and the like; and examples of the alkali metal phosphates include trisodium phosphate, sodium hydrogenphosphate, and the like.

(17) In addition, examples of the neutral amines include monoethanolamine, cyclohexylamine, morpholine, diethylethanolamine, monoisopropanolamine, 3-methoxypropylamine, 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol, and the like.

(18) Among the alkaline agents, the neutral amine migrates into the steam condensing system, and therefore, in order to adjust the pH of the boiler water to 11.3 or more, the neutral amine must be added in a high concentration. In addition, when the neutral amine is added in such a high concentration, an offensive smell is generated in the steam or steam condensate, or the pH of the steam condensate system excessively rises, so that when a copper-based material is present in the system, corrosion is possibly caused. For this reason, as the alkaline agent, an alkali metal hydroxide, an alkali metal carbonate, and an alkali metal phosphate are preferred; and sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, and the like are more preferred from the viewpoint of economy.

(19) The alkaline agent may be used solely or in combination of two or more thereof.

(20) It is preferred to add the alkaline agent to the makeup water or feed-water. It should be noted that in the case where the steam generation facility is of a circulation type, the alkaline agent may be added to the steam condensate.

(21) It should be noted that in order to supply an appropriate amount of the alkaline agent, it is preferred to provide a pH measuring means on the upstream side and/or the downstream side of the boiler vessel.

(22) As the feed-water, water obtained by treating the raw water with a reverse osmosis membrane, water obtained by subjecting the raw water to a softening treatment, water obtained by subjecting the raw water to an ion exchange treatment, and the like may be used.

(23) <Polyacrylic Acid or Salt Thereof>

(24) In the present invention, a polyacrylic acid or a salt thereof is added while adjusting the pH of the boiler water to 11.3 or more.

(25) The polyacrylic acid is not particularly limited, and it is possible to use one satisfying the requirement regarding the weight average molecular weight as described later. Examples of the polyacrylic acid salt include sodium salts, potassium salts, and the like of the aforementioned polyacrylic acid. The polyacrylic acid salt may be obtained by adding an alkali metal hydroxide, such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, etc., an alkali metal carbonate, such as sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, etc., or the like together with the polyacrylic acid.

(26) In addition, in the present invention, a polyacrylic acid having a weight average molecular weight that is 0.50 to 2.00 times a reference weight average molecular weight as calculated from the following calculation formula (1), or a salt thereof, is used in accordance with the pH value of the boiler water.
Reference weight average molecular weight=−8462×{(pH value)−11.3}+61538  (1)

(27) In addition, the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid is preferably 0.70 to 1.70 times, more preferably 0.80 to 1.60 times, and still more preferably 0.90 to 1.40 times the reference weight average molecular weight as calculated from the foregoing calculation formula (1).

(28) It should be noted that in the case of a salt of the polyacrylic acid, the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid that is a base of the polyacrylic acid salt has only to satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

(29) FIG. 3 is a graph showing a relation between a pH and a weight average molecular weight of a polyacrylic acid that is optimum for the scale removal in a pH region of from 11.1 to 12.0. As shown in FIG. 3, as the pH becomes high, the optimum weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid becomes small, and it is perceived that there is a substantially linear relation in a pH region of from 11.3 to 12.0. The optimum weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid at each pH, that is a base of FIG. 3, is one read out from FIG. 2.

(30) Then, by undergoing the least squares method of a section in a pH region of from 11.3 to 12.0 that is a substantially linear relation, the foregoing calculation formula (1) can be calculated, and a reference weight average molecular weight at each pH can be obtained (see FIG. 4).

(31) It should be noted that in FIG. 4, the calculation formula for obtaining the reference weight average molecular weight from the least squares method regarding three pH points of 11.3, 11.5, and 12.0 is calculated; however, the following way may also be taken. Namely, in at least three pH values of 11.3 or more, a weight average molecular weight (Mw.sub.max) of the polyacrylic acid at which a scale removal rate becomes maximum is measured, a relation formula between pH and Mw.sub.max is determined by the least squares method while defining the pH as the x-axis and the Mw.sub.max as the y-axis, respectively, and a weight average molecular weight at each pH obtained from the relation formula is defined as the reference weight average molecular weight.

(32) In this way, in the present invention, the scale removal rate may be made favorable by adding the polyacrylic acid satisfying the foregoing calculation formula (1) or its salt in accordance with the pH value of the boiler water.

(33) An addition amount of the polyacrylic acid or its salt is preferably 10 to 500 mg/L in terms of its concentration in the boiler water. So long as the addition amount of the polyacrylic acid or its salt is 10 mg/L or more, the scale removing effect may be made easy to exhibit, and so long as it is 500 mg/L or less, the cost-effectiveness may be made favorable while preventing complicatedness of the waste water treatment due to an increase of COD from occurring.

(34) In addition, the addition amount of the polyacrylic acid or its salt is more preferably 20 to 400 mg/L, still more preferably 30 to 300 mg/L, and yet still more preferably 50 to 250 mg/L in terms of its concentration in the boiler water.

(35) It is preferred to add polyacrylic acid or its salt to the makeup water or feed-water. It should be noted that in the case where the steam generation facility is of a circulation type, the polyacrylic acid or its salt may be added to the steam condensate.

(36) It should be noted that it is preferred to make a constitution so as to provide a pH measuring means on the upstream side and/or the downstream side of the boiler vessel and associate the pH measuring means with a means for adding the polyacrylic acid or its salt, thereby automatically selecting and adding the polyacrylic acid having an appropriate weight average molecular weight.

(37) <Arbitrary Additives>

(38) In the present invention, various additives, for example, an oxygen scavenger, a corrosion-inhibitor, a scale-inhibitor, and the like, may be used, if desired in any one of places in the system of the steam generation facility within the range where the object of the present invention is not impaired.

(39) Examples of the scale-inhibitor include various phosphates, water-soluble polymer compounds, such as a polyacrylic acid not satisfying the aforementioned requirement (one having a lower weight average molecular weight), a polymethacrylic acid, a polymaleic acid, and sodium salts thereof, etc., phosphonates, chelating agents, and the like. Of those, a polymethacrylic acid is suitable from the standpoint that by using it in combination with the polyacrylic acid satisfying the aforementioned requirement or its salt, in the case where the iron concentration in the feed-water to the boiler is more than 0.3 mg/L, the scale removal efficiency (for example, in the case of a high concentration of 0.3 to 5.0 mg/L) may be drastically improved.

(40) A concentration of the polymethacrylic acid in the boiler water is preferably 1 to 1,000 mg/L, and more preferably 10 to 500 mg/L. In addition, it is preferred to add the polymethacrylic acid in such a manner that a mass ratio of the polyacrylic acid (salt) to the polymethacrylic acid (salt) in the boiler water is 1/100 to 100/1, and especially 1/50 to 50/1.

(41) In addition, a weight average molecular weight of the polymethacrylic acid is preferably 1,000 to 100,000, and more preferably 5,000 to 60,000. When the weight average molecular weight of the polymethacrylic acid is less than 1,000, there is a concern that the sufficient scale inhibiting effect for iron may not be obtained, whereas when the weight average molecular weight of the polymethacrylic acid is more than 100,000, the effect is lowered.

EXAMPLES

(42) Next, the present invention is explained in more detail by reference to Examples, but it should be construed that the present invention is not limited at all by these Examples.

Test Example 1

(43) Any influences of the pH and the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid against the scale removal rate were investigated under the following conditions.

(44) Test equipment: Stainless steel-made test boiler

(45) Synthetic water A: Ca hardness: 10 mg CaCO.sub.3/L, Mg hardness: 5 mg CaCO.sub.3/L, silica: 15 mg/L, sodium carbonate: 25 mg/L in terms of concentrations in the feed-water

(46) Synthetic water B: Silica: 15 mg/L in terms of a concentration in the feed-water; 20 mg/L in terms of a concentration in the feed-water (200 mg/L in terms of a concentration in the inside of the boiler vessel) of a polyacrylic acid having a weight average molecular weight shown in Table 1 was added, and sodium carbonate was also added to the feed-water so as to provide a pH of the boiler water shown in Table 1.

(47) Temperature of feed-water: 40° C.

(48) Operative pressure: 2.0 MPa

(49) Supply rate of feed-water: 9 L/h

(50) Concentration cycles: 10 times

(51) Measurement of Scale Removal Rate:

(52) Three heating tubes (steel-made, surface area: 200 cm.sup.2) are weighed and recorded before the test. In the stainless steel-made test boiler (holding water quantity: 5 L), synthetic water concentrated to an extent corresponding to 10 times the concentration cycles in the inside of the boiler vessel (corresponding to 10 times the concentration cycles of the synthetic water A) was prepared and charged, and the test boiler was operated at a pressure of 2.0 MPa, an evaporation rate of 8.2 L/h, and a blow down rate of 0.8 L/h in a concentration cycles of 10 times for 21 hours while supplying the synthetic water A. After the operation, the scale-deposited three heating tubes (iron-made, surface area: 200 cm.sup.2) were taken out and weighed, and an amount of the deposited scale was calculated. Thereafter, the heating tubes were again inserted; in the vessel, synthetic water concentrated to an extent corresponding to 10 times the concentration cycles of the synthetic water B was prepared and charged; and the test boiler was operated with the synthetic water B for 3 days under the same conditions, followed by undergoing the scale removal step. After the operation, the heating tubes were weighed in the same manner, and a scale removal rate was calculated from the amount of the deposited scale before and after the scale removal step. The results are shown in Table 1. In addition, a relation between the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid and the scale removal rate at every pH is shown in FIG. 2.

(53) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Weight average molecular weight pH Scale removal rate (%) Test Example 1-1 20,000 11.1 59 Test Example 1-2 50,000 11.1 69 Test Example 1-3 75,000 11.1 72 Test Example 1-4 100,000 11.1 71 Test Example 1-5 170,000 11.1 64 Test Example 1-6 20,000 11.3 75 Test Example 1-7 50,000 11.3 87 Test Example 1-8 75,000 11.3 88 Test Example 1-9 100,000 11.3 84 Test Example 1-10 170,000 11.3 79 Test Example 1-11 20,000 11.5 76 Test Example 1-12 50,000 11.5 89 Test Example 1-13 75,000 11.5 90 Test Example 1-14 100,000 11.5 85 Test Example 1-15 170,000 11.5 83 Test Example 1-16 20,000 12.0 79 Test Example 1-17 50,000 12.0 92 Test Example 1-18 75,000 12.0 92 Test Example 1-19 100,000 12.0 89 Test Example 1-20 170,000 12.0 84

(54) It is noted from Table 1 and FIG. 2 that when the pH is 11.3 or more, the scale removal rate is tremendously improved. In addition, it is noted that when the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid is low, the scale removal rate is lowered, whereas when it is excessively high, the scale removal rate is lowered, too.

(55) In addition, it is noted from the curve at each pH in FIG. 2 that the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid that is optimum for the scale removal is present at each pH. Specifically, it is read out that the optimum weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid is 81,500 at the pH of 11.1, 62,500 at the pH of 11.3, 58,500 at the pH of 11.5, and 56,000 at the pH of 12.0, respectively.

(56) FIG. 3 is a graph showing an optimum weight average molecular weight of a polyacrylic acid at each pH. It is noted from FIG. 3 that a substantially linear relation is perceived in a pH region of from 11.3 to 12.0.

(57) When the least squares method of a section in a pH region of from 11.3 to 12.0 in a substantially linear relation is undergone, its intercept is 61,538, and its slope is −8,462.

(58) FIG. 4 is a graph a relation between a pH and a weight average molecular weight of a polyacrylic acid that is optimum for the scale removal in a pH region of from 11.3 to 12.0 by the least squares method. In order to improve the scale removal rate, it is noted that the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid has only to be determined on the basis of the straight line (calculation formula (1) as described below) of FIG. 4 in view of the relation with the pH.
Reference weight average molecular weight=−8462×{(pH value)−11.3}+61538  (1)

(59) In addition, it is noted from FIG. 2 that the equal scale removal rate can be obtained in a region of even less or more than the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid that is optimum for the scale removal; and that the scale removal rate on the higher side than the optimum weight average molecular weight is hardly lowered as compared with that on the lower side than the optimum weight average molecular weight.

(60) It is noted from the foregoing results that when the requirement to add a polyacrylic acid having a weight average molecular weight that is 0.50 to 2.00 times a reference weight average molecular weight as calculated from the foregoing calculation formula (1), or a salt thereof, in accordance with the pH value of the boiler water is satisfied, it is possible to improve the scale removal rate.

(61) In the foregoing test examples, Test Examples 1-7, 1-8, 1-9, 1-12, 1-13, 1-14, 1-17, 1-18, and 1-19 satisfy the subject requirement, and it is noted that in these test examples, the scale removal rate is favorable as compared with other test examples in which the pH is identical.

Test Example 21

(62) Any influences of the polyacrylic acid and the chemical concentration against the scale removal rate were investigated under the following conditions.

(63) Test equipment: Stainless steel-made test boiler

(64) Synthetic water C: Ca hardness: 20 mg CaCO.sub.3/L, Mg hardness: 10 mg CaCO.sub.3/L, silica: 15 mg SiO.sub.2/L, sodium carbonate: 35 mg Na.sub.2CO.sub.3/L in terms of concentrations in the feed-water

(65) Synthetic water D: Silica: 15 mg SiO.sub.2/L and sodium carbonate: 20 mg Na.sub.2CO.sub.3/L in terms of concentrations in the feed-water; and a chemical shown in Table 2 was added to the feed-water so as to provide a concentration in the inside of the boiler vessel shown in Table 2.

(66) Temperature of feed-water: 40° C.

(67) Operative pressure: 2.0 MPa

(68) Supply rate of feed-water: 9 L/h

(69) Concentration cycles: 10 times

(70) Measurement of Scale Removal Rate:

(71) Three heating tubes (steel-made, surface area: 200 cm.sup.2) before the test are weighed and recorded. In a stainless steel-made test boiler (holding water quantity: 5 L), synthetic water concentrated to an extent corresponding to 10 times the concentration cycles in the inside of the boiler vessel (corresponding to 10 times the concentration cycles of the synthetic water C) was prepared and charged, and the test boiler was operated at a pressure of 2.0 MPa, an evaporation rate of 8.2 L/h, and a blow rate of 0.8 L/h in a concentration cycles of 10 times for 21 hours while supplying the synthetic water C. After the operation, the scale-deposited on the surface of three heating tubes (iron-made, surface area: 200 cm.sup.2) were taken out and weighed, and an amount of the deposited scale was calculated. Thereafter, the heating tubes were again inserted; in the vessel, synthetic water concentrated to an extent corresponding to 10 times the concentration cycles of the synthetic water D was prepared and charged; and the test boiler was operated with the synthetic water D for 6 days under the same conditions, followed by undergoing the scale removal step. After the operation, the heating tubes were weighed in the same manner, and a scale removal rate was calculated from the amount of the deposited scale before and after the scale removal step. The results are shown in Table 2.

(72) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Chemical Weight Chemical average concen- Scale molecular tration removal Kind weight (mg/L) pH rate (%) Test Example 2-1 PAA 4,000 10 11.3 12 Test Example 2-2 PAA 4,000 100 11.3 23 Test Example 2-3 PAA 4,000 500 11.3 26 Test Example 2-4 PAA 10,000 100 11.3 28 Test Example 2-5 AA/ 10,000 100 11.3 22 AMPS Test Example 2-6 AA/ 10,000 100 11.3 26 HAPS Test Example 2-7 PAA 20,000 50 11.3 61 Test Example 2-8 PAA 20,000 100 11.3 71 Test Example 2-9 PAA 52,000 10 11.3 32 Test Example 2-10 PAA 52,000 20 11.3 44 Test Example 2-11 PAA 52,000 30 11.3 62 Test Example 2-12 PAA 52,000 50 11.3 73 Test Example 2-13 PAA 52,000 100 11.3 85 Test Example 2-14 PAA 52,000 500 11.3 90 Test Example 2-15 PAA 60,000 50 11.3 78 Test Example 2-16 PAA 60,000 100 11.3 88 Test Example 2-17 PAA 60,000 500 11.3 93 Test Example 2-18 PAA 75,000 50 11.3 76 Test Example 2-19 PAA 75,000 100 11.3 87 Test Example 2-20 PAA 75,000 500 11.3 91 Test Example 2-21 PAA 100,000 50 11.3 72 Test Example 2-22 PAA 100,000 100 11.3 77 Test Example 2-23 PAA 170,000 100 11.3 70 Test Example 2-24 PAA 250,000 100 11.3 19 *PAA: Polyacrylic acid *AA: Acrylic acid *AMPS: 2-Acrylamide-2-methylpropanesulfone *HAPS: 3-Allyloxy-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonic acid * AA/AMPS and AA/HAPS each are 80/20.

(73) It is noted from the results of Table 2 that by increasing the concentration of the polyacrylic acid, the scale removal rate is improved. On the other hand, in the case of not using the polyacrylic acid, it is noted that even though increasing the concentration of the chemical, the scale removal rate cannot be sufficiently increased.

(74) In the foregoing test examples, Test Examples 2-9 to 2-22 satisfy the requirement regarding the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid according to the present invention, and it is noted that in these test examples, the scale removal rate is favorable as compared with other test examples in which the concentration of the polyacrylic acid is identical.

Test Example 31

(75) In undergoing the scale removal using the synthetic water D (however, under the conditions shown in Table 3 regarding the kind of chemical, the molecular weight, and the concentration in the inside of boiler vessel) under the same conditions as those in Test Example 2, a steel-made test piece (SGP, 15×50×10 mm, polished with #400) was installed in the boiler vessel. After the test, a derusting treatment was carried out, and a corrosion rate was determined according to the following calculation formula (2).
Corrosion rate (mdd)=Corrosion weight loss of test piece (mg)/{Surface area of test piece (dm.sup.2)×Test period (day)}

(76) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Chemical Weight Chemical average concen- Corrosion molecular tration rate Kind weight (mg/L) pH (mdd) Test Example 3-1 PAA 2,000 200 11.3 13 Test Example 3-2 PAA 52,000 200 11.3 16 Test Example 3-3 PAA 75,000 200 11.3 16 Test Example 3-4 PAA 100,000 200 11.3 21 Test Example 3-5 PAA 170,000 200 11.3 22 Test Example 3-6 PMAA 10,000 200 11.3 14 Test Example 3-7 EDTA — 200 11.3 72 Test Example 3-8 NTA — 200 11.3 59 *PMAA: Polymethacrylic acid

(77) It is noted from the results of Table 3 that in the mode of scale removal not using a chelating agent such as EDTA or NTA, the corrosion rate is slow.

Test Example 41

(78) (Total Scale Removal Rate)

(79) The test boiler having three heating tubes (steel-made, surface area: 200 cm.sup.2) was operated for 21 hours under the same conditions as those in Test Example 2, except that synthetic water F prepared by adding iron chloride and iron hydroxide to the synthetic water C in a mass proportion of 1/1 such that the iron concentration was 1.5 mg Fe/L was used as the feed-water. After the operation, one of the three heating tubes was taken out and exchanged with a polished heating tube. In addition, the heating tube as taken out was weighed, and an amount of the deposited scale was calculated.

(80) Subsequently, the test boiler was operated for 6 days under the same conditions as those in Test Example 2, except that synthetic water G prepared by adding iron chloride and iron hydroxide to the synthetic water D in a mass proportion of 1/1 such that the iron concentration was 1.5 mg Fe/L and changing the kind of chemical, the molecular weight, and the concentration in the inside of the boiler vessel as shown in Table 4 was used as the feed-water, respectively, followed by undergoing the scale removal step. After the additional operation, the heating tubes which had not been exchanged after the preceding operation were weighed, and a total scale removal rate was calculated from the amount of the deposited scale before and after the scale removal step. The results are shown in Table 4.

(81) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Chemical 1 Chemical 2 Weight Weight Scale average Chemical average Chemical removal molecular concentration molecular concentration rate Kind weight (mg/L) Kind weight (mg/L) pH (%) Test Example 4-1 Blank — — — — — 11.3 2 Test Example 4-2 PAA 52,000 100 — — — 11.3 61 Test Example 4-3 PAA 75,000 100 — — — 11.3 63 Test Example 4-4 PAA 100,000 100 — — — 11.3 54 Test Example 4-5 PAA 52,000 200 — — — 11.3 69 Test Example 4-6 PAA 75,000 200 — — — 11.3 71 Test Example 4-7 PAA 100,000 200 — — — 11.3 61 Test Example 4-8 PAA 52,000 100 PMAA 10,000 100 11.3 88 Test Example 4-9 PAA 60,000 100 PMAA 10,000 100 11.3 93 Test Example 4-10 PAA 75,000 100 PMAA 10,000 100 11.3 90 Test Example 4-11 PAA 100,000 100 PMAA 10,000 100 11.3 81

(82) In the foregoing test examples, Test Examples 4-2 to 4-11 satisfy the requirement regarding the weight average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid according to the present invention. These Test Examples exhibit a favorable scale removal rate, and above all, Test Examples 4-8 to 4-11 exhibit a conspicuously excellent scale removal rate. From these results, it is possible to confirm that in the case where iron is contained in a relatively high concentration in the boiler feed-water, when the polyacrylic acid is combined with the polymethacrylic acid, the total scale removal rate can be drastically improved as compared with the sole treatment with the polyacrylic acid. It may be presumed that this fact demonstrates that when the polyacrylic acid is used solely, the dispersing effect of the iron scale cannot be optimized, and the iron scale is further deposited on the hard components scale, thereby lowering the effect of removing the hard components scale. On the other hand, it is noted that in the case of combining the polyacrylic acid with the polymethacrylic acid, the adhesion of the iron scale onto the hard components scale is prevented from occurring, whereby the effect of removing the hard components scale with the polyacrylic acid is sufficiently exhibited.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

(83) 1: Steam condensate tank 11: Steam condensate line 2: Makeup water tank 21: Makeup water line 3: Feed-water tank 31: Feed-water line 4: Polyacrylic acid or its salt 5: Alkaline agent 6: Steam generation portion (boiler vessel) 61: Drain recovery line 7: Steam generation facility