HYBRID COMPOSITE PROJECTILE BARREL

Abstract

An improved hybrid composite projectile barrel comprising an inner liner and an outer composite matrix, the inner liner having a breech transition region and a muzzle transition region. The breech transition region and the muzzle transition region each comprises locking features that secure the outer composite matrix to the inner liner at the transition regions. In a first embodiment, the locking features are a series of longitudinally extending ribs with notches. In a second embodiment, the locking features are a plurality of pins disposed around the circumference of the breech and muzzle transition regions. In a third embodiment, the ridges and pins are combined such that a pin extends from the top of each ridge. In each embodiment with pins, the height of the pins is preferably adjusted so that the top ends of the pins form a line that is parallel with the outer diameter of the inner liner.

Claims

1. An improved hybrid composite projectile barrel comprising: (a) an inner liner having a cylindrical structure, an outer diameter, a first end, a second end, a central portion, a central bore extending longitudinally through a center of the inner liner, a breech transition region, and a muzzle transition region; wherein the central portion of the inner liner is situated between the breech transition region and the muzzle transition region; wherein the breech transition region has an outer diameter that increases from the central portion to the first end of the inner liner; and wherein the muzzle transition region has an outer diameter that increases from the central portion to the second end of the inner liner; (b) an outer composite layer comprised of a matrix with a continuous reinforcement fiber; and (c) a plurality of locking features situated in the breech transition region and on the muzzle transition region.

2. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 1, wherein the locking features that are situated in the breech transition region are a plurality of ribs that are formed by a plurality of grooves that extend longitudinally from a proximal end of the breech transition region to a distal end of the breech transition region; wherein the locking features that are situated in the muzzle transition region are a plurality of ribs that are formed by a plurality of grooves that extend longitudinally from a proximal end of the muzzle transition region to a distal end of the muzzle transition region; wherein each rib is situated between two adjacent longitudinal grooves; and wherein there are no locking features situated in the central portion of the inner liner.

3. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 2, wherein the ribs are aligned axially relative to the cylindrical structure of the inner liner.

4. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 2, wherein the ribs are aligned helically relative to the cylindrical structure of the inner liner.

5. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 2, wherein a plurality of notches is cut perpendicularly into a top of each rib, thereby forming a plurality of ridges on each rib; and wherein the notches are shallower than the longitudinal grooves.

6. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 2, wherein each rib has a proximal end and a distal end; wherein each rib in the breech transition region is wider at the proximal end of the rib than it is at the distal end of the rib; wherein each rib in the muzzle transition region is wider at the distal end of the rib than it is at the proximal end of the rib; and wherein each longitudinal groove has a first tapered end, a second tapered end, and a constant width in between the first tapered end and the second tapered end.

7. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 1, wherein the locking features that are situated in the breech transition region are a plurality of pins that are oriented radially around a circumference of the breech transition region; wherein the locking features that are situated in the muzzle transition region are a plurality of pins that are oriented radially around a circumference of the muzzle transition region; and wherein there are no locking features situated in the central portion of the inner liner.

8. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 7, wherein the plurality of pins in the breech transition region are arranged in rows that extend longitudinally from a proximal end of the breech transition region to a distal end of the breech transition region; and wherein the plurality of pins in the muzzle transition region are arranged in rows that extend longitudinally from a proximal end of the muzzle transition region to a distal end of the muzzle transition region.

9. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 7, wherein the plurality of pins in the breech transition region are disposed helically around a circumference of the breech transition region; and wherein the plurality of pins in the muzzle transition region are disposed helically around a circumference of the muzzle transition region.

10. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 7, wherein each pin has a height and a top end: wherein the height of the pins gradually increases from the proximal end of the breech transition region to the distal end of the breech transition region such that the top ends of the pins are configured to form a line that is parallel to the outer diameter of the inner liner; and wherein the height of the pins gradually increases from the distal end of the muzzle transition region to the proximal end of the muzzle transition region such that the top ends of the pins are configured to form a line that is parallel to the outer diameter of the inner liner.

11. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 5, further comprising a pin that is situated on top of and extends outwardly from each ridge.

12. The improved hybrid composite projectile barrel of claim 12, wherein each pin has a height; and wherein the height of the pins increases gradually from a proximal end of the breech transition region to a distal end of the breech transition region such that the top ends of the pins are configured to form a line that is parallel to the outer diameter of the inner liner; and wherein the height of the pins increases gradually from a distal end of the muzzle transition region to a proximal end of the muzzle transition region such that the top ends of the pins are configured to form a line that is parallel to the outer diameter of the inner liner.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0020] FIG. 1 is a side view of a conventional modern hybrid composite firearm barrel.

[0021] FIG. 2 is a longitudinal section view of a conventional modem hybrid composite firearm barrel.

[0022] FIG. 3 is a side view of the inner liner of a conventional modem hybrid composite firearm barrel.

[0023] FIG. 4 is a radial section view of the inner liner of a conventional modern hybrid composite firearm barrel taken at the line shown in FIG. 3.

[0024] FIG. 5 is a radial section view of the inner liner of a conventional modern hybrid composite firearm barrel taken at the line shown in FIG. 3.

[0025] FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a first embodiment of the present invention.

[0026] FIG. 7 is a side view of a first embodiment of the present invention.

[0027] FIG. 8 is a longitudinal section view of a first embodiment of the present invention.

[0028] FIG. 9 is a radial section view of a first embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 8.

[0029] FIG. 10 is a radial section view of a first embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 8.

[0030] FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of the present invention.

[0031] FIG. 12 is a side view of a second embodiment of the present invention.

[0032] FIG. 13 is a longitudinal section view of a second embodiment of the present invention.

[0033] FIG. 14 is a radial section view of a second embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 13.

[0034] FIG. 15 is a radial section view of a second embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 13.

[0035] FIG. 16 is a perspective view of a third embodiment of the present invention.

[0036] FIG. 17 is a side view of a third embodiment of the present invention.

[0037] FIG. 18 is a longitudinal section view of a third embodiment of the present invention.

[0038] FIG. 19 is a radial section view of a third embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 18.

[0039] FIG. 20 is a radial section view of a third embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 18.

[0040] FIG. 21 is a diagram of the rib width as compared to the rib top space in a first embodiment of the present invention.

[0041] FIG. 22 is a graph illustrating the relationship between mass ratio M.sub.INR/M.sub.CONV to rib ratio W.sub.Rib/W.sub.Top.

REFERENCE NUMBERS

[0042] 1 Firearm barrel [0043] 2 Outer composite layer [0044] 3 Inner liner [0045] 4 Central bore (in inner liner) [0046] 5 Ribs [0047] 6 Longitudinal grooves [0048] 7 Notches [0049] 8 Ridges [0050] 9 Pins [0051] 10 Breech end (of inner liner) [0052] 11 Muzzle end (of inner liner)

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

A. Overview

[0053] The present invention is an innovative approach to enhancing the structural integrity of the BTR and MIR interfaces by establishing geometric features that allow interlocking of the composite material to the steel barrel component. These features are incorporated into the inner structure of the hybrid barrel. When the outer composite layer is subsequently added to the inner structure and cured, it is integrally “locked” to the inner structure by the geometric features. With the addition of these features, the integrity of the joint between the composite material component and steel component is not exclusively dependent on adhesive strength; rather, the strength of the joint in this invention is limited by the material characteristics of the constituent structures. This allows for the mechanical locking features at the BTR and MTR interfaces to transfer stresses (thermally induced stresses and mechanical stresses induced by applied loads) more effectively than an adhesive joint.

[0054] Applying this mechanical locking joint to a hybrid composite barrel results in an assembly that can withstand substantially higher thermal stresses and stresses from applied loads without failure. This is particularly important in applications where semi-automatic and fully automatic repeating weapons cause barrel temperatures in excess of 1000° F./540° C. At such temperatures, the stresses caused by differences in thermal expansion between composite components and steel components are considerable. In addition, processing of the outer composite body imparts thermal stresses into the hybrid system (because the curing process may require temperatures as high as 750° F./400° C.). These thermal stresses, in combination with stresses caused by applied barrel loads, can easily exceed the adhesive strength of the BTR and MTR composite-steel interfaces: however, by applying this invention to the BTR and MTR, the strength of the interface can be significantly increased while transmitting stresses more effectively from the inner structure to the outer composite body.

[0055] The present invention solves this problem by modifying the geometry of the inner structure component in the BTR and MTR regions to provide for mechanical locking of the continuous fiber composite component to the inner structural component. Rather than depending on the adhesive joint of the inner structure and outer composite layer interface, the present invention enables the continuous reinforcement of the composite layer to mechanically integrate with the steel barrel component. This integration achieves two goals: transmitting stresses more effectively from the inner structure to the outer composite layers and increasing the failure strength at the BTR and MTR interfaces. In turn, the improved hybrid composite barrel is able to withstand substantially higher levels of thermally induced and applied load stress at both of these interfaces without failure (separation of the joint).

B. Detailed Description of the Figures

[0056] FIG. 1 is a side view of a conventional modern hybrid composite firearm barrel. Conventional modem firearm barrels are circular in cross-section geometry, although the present invention is equally applicable to non-circular cross-section structures. Examples include hexagonal cross-section barrels common in historic firearm designs and any other multifaceted barrel of modem design (e.g., U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/001,337 (Curliss, 2018)). Referring to FIG. 1, the firearm barrel 1 is comprised of an outer composite layer 2 and an inner liner 3. The inner liner 3 is typically made of metal; in a preferred embodiment, this metal is 416 stainless steel.

[0057] FIG. 2 is a longitudinal section view of a conventional modern hybrid composite firearm barrel. As shown in this figure, the inner liner 3 comprises a central bore 4 through which the projectile passes when the firearm is discharged. Note that the inner liner has an outer diameter “x.” at the breech end of the inner liner and an outer diameter “y” at the muzzle end of the inner liner. The inner liner also has an outer diameter at the central portion (labelled as “z” in FIG. 2) of the inner liner; in this embodiment, the outer diameter decreases gradually from the proximal end of the central portion (a′) to the distal end of the central portion (b′). The outer diameter of the inner liner increases sharply from the proximal end of the central portion to the breech end of the inner liner; as noted above, this area is referred to herein as the “Breech Transition Ramp” or BTR region. Similarly, the outer diameter of the inner liner increases sharply from the distal end of the central portion to the muzzle end of the inner liner; as noted above, this area is referred to herein as the “Muzzle Transition Ramp” or MTR region.

[0058] FIG. 3 is a side view of the inner liner of a conventional modem hybrid composite firearm barrel. This figure clearly illustrates the BTR and MTR regions of the inner liner.

[0059] FIG. 4 is a radial section view of the inner liner of a conventional modern hybrid composite firearm barrel taken at the line shown in FIG. 3, and FIG. 5 is a radial section view of the inner liner of a conventional modern hybrid composite firearm barrel taken at the line shown in FIG. 3. These two figures are provided primarily for comparison with FIGS. 9 and 10, 14 and 15, and 19 and 20.

[0060] FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a first embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, integral notched ribs are incorporated into the BTR and MTR regions of the barrel. As shown in this figure, the ribs 5 are formed by a plurality of grooves 6 that extend longitudinally from a proximal end of the BTR. (c′) to a distal end of the BTR (the distal end of the BTR also being the proximal end of the central portion (a′)) and a plurality of grooves 6 that extend longitudinally from a proximal end of the MTR (the proximal end of the MTR also being the distal end of the central portion (b′) to a distal end of the MTR (d′). It is important to note that there are no ribs 5 (or longitudinal grooves 6) in the central portion of the inner liner 3.

[0061] FIG. 7 is a side view of a first embodiment of the present invention. As shown in this figure, the ribs 5 are aligned axially relative to the cylindrical structure of the inner liner 3, and each rib 5 is situated between two longitudinal grooves 6. In alternate embodiments (not shown), the ribs 5 may be helically pitched (spiraled).

[0062] FIG. 8 is a longitudinal section view of a first embodiment of the present invention. As shown in this figure, a plurality of notches 7 is cut perpendicularly (laterally) into the top of each rib 5, thereby forming a plurality of ridges 8. Note that the notches 7 are not as deep as the longitudinal grooves 6; in other words, the notches 7 are shallower than the longitudinal grooves 6. The notches 7 are preferably trough-shaped (that is, with two angled side walls and a floor that is narrower than the open end of the trough) evenly spaced on the ribs 5.

[0063] FIG. 9 is a radial section view of a first embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 8, and FIG. 10 is a radial section view of a first embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 8. It is clear from these two figures that each rib 5 in the BTR region (shown in FIG. 9) is wider at its proximal end (c′) than it is at its distal end (a′), and each rib 5 in the MTR region (shown in FIG. 10) is wider at its distal end (d′) than at its proximal end (b′). By contrast, the longitudinal grooves 6 preferably have a constant width except at their tips, where they taper to a point.

[0064] When the outer composite layer is added to the inner structure (liner), the composite material is cured as it is interlocked with the ribs and notches, thereby providing for effective sharing of stresses between the inner and outer structures (the inner structure being the inner liner 3 and the outer structure being the outer composite layer 2). Although a preferred embodiment is shown in FIGS. 6-10, the geometry of the ribs 5 may vary widely depending on the design requirements of the structure. The geometric factors that may be varied to optimize the performance of the ribs include, but are not limited to: the number of ribs; the width of the rib relative to the channel or spacing between the ribs; whether each rib has a constant or tapered width in both the radial and longitudinal directions relative to the axis of the cylindrical structure; the number of notches in each rib; the spacing of the notches along the top of each rib (including the spacing of notches relative to adjacent ribs); the geometry of each notch (i.e., the width, depth and angles of notch surfaces relative to the axis of the cylindrical structure); and whether each longitudinal groove has a constant or tapered width in both the radial and longitudinal directions relative to the axis of the cylindrical structure.

[0065] FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a second embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, integral locking pins are incorporated into the BTR and MTR regions of the barrel. In this embodiment, integral locking pins are oriented radially around the circumference of the BTR and MTR regions of the barrel. This locking feature performs the same function as the integral notched rib embodiment, which is to increase stress transfer between the outer composite layer 2 and the inner liner 3, thereby increasing the strength of the assembly and preventing adhesive fracture at the interfaces. Stress transfer may be optimized by canting the pins at an angle toward either end of the cylindrical assembly (not shown). When the outer composite material is added to the inner structure during manufacturing, the composite material engages the pins at the BTR and MTR regions. After curing the composite becomes structurally integrated with the inner liner 3, dramatically increasing the strength of the joint at the transition regions.

[0066] Referring to FIG. 11, in this embodiment, a plurality of pins 9 extends radially outward in the BTR and MTR regions of the barrel. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 11, the pins are arranged in rows that extend longitudinally from a proximal end of the BTR (c′) to a distal end of the BTR (the distal end of the BTR also being the proximal end of the central portion (a′)) and from a proximal end of the MTR (the proximal end of the MTR also being the distal end of the central portion (b′) to a distal end of the MTR (d′). In this particular embodiment, because the width of the BTR at a′ is less than the width of the BTR at c′ and the width of the MTR at b′ is less than the width of the MTR at d′, the spacing between the rows of pins 9 is greater at c′ and d′ than it is at a′ and b′ (see also FIG. 12). As with the ribs, the pins may be disposed helically (spirally) rather around the MTR and BTR regions rather than arranged in rows.

[0067] FIG. 12 is a side view of a second embodiment of the present invention. As shown in this figure, there are no pins 9 in the central portion of the inner liner 3.

[0068] FIG. 13 is a longitudinal section view of a second embodiment of the present invention. As shown in this figure, the height of each individual pin 9 preferably increases from c′ to a′ and from d′ to b′ so that the top ends of all of the pins 9 from c′ to d′ in the BTR region form a line that is parallel to the outer diameter of the central portion of the inner liner 3. While standard rifle barrels (that is, the central portion of a rifle barrel) taper from breech to muzzle, high-precision rifles will often use a barrel with far less taper, called a “heavy barrel.” sometimes leaving the barrel cylindrical all the way to the muzzle, called a “hull barrel.”

[0069] FIG. 14 is a radial section view of a second embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 13, and FIG. 15 is a radial section view of a second embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 13. As depicted in these views, the pins 9 are arranged in rows that correspond to the ribs 5 of the previous invention.

[0070] As with the first embodiment (interlocking ribs), the geometry of the pins 9 may be varied depending on the design requirements of the structure. The geometric factors that may be varied to optimize the performance of the interlocking pins include, but are not limited to: the number of pins; the diameter of the pins; the radial height of the pins; the spacing of the pins in the longitudinal and circumferential directions around the BTR and MTR regions; and the geometry and shape of individual pins to facilitate interlocking of the composite to the inner structure.

[0071] FIG. 16 is a perspective view of a third embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the interlocking ribs 5 of the first embodiment are combined with the interlocking pins 9 of the second embodiment. In this embodiment, a single pin 9 is situated on top of each ridge 8 on the rib 5. As with the second embodiment, the height of each pin 9 is adjusted so that the top ends of the pins 9 form a line that is parallel to the outer diameter of the inner liner.

[0072] FIG. 17 is a side view of a third embodiment of the present invention. When used together, the ribs 5 and pins 9 provide increased interface strength and mass reduction with additional reinforcement of the outer composite layer to the inner structure joint. For applications where only the interlocking pins 9 are used, mass reduction and additional joint reinforcement are not present, but the assembly will still experience enhanced stress transfer between the inner structure and outer composite layer.

[0073] FIG. 18 is a longitudinal section view of a third embodiment of the present invention. The present invention is not limited to any particular placement, number of geometry of pin integration with the ribs. With all three embodiments (interlocking ribs, interlocking pins, or interlocking ribs and pins), the angle of the BTR and MTR regions may be adjusted to provide greater or lesser engagement between the locking features and the outer composite layer; for example, if the angle is made less steep (so that the BTR and MTR regions are longer), greater surface area is provided for the locking features.

[0074] FIG. 19 is a radial section view of a third embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 18, and FIG. 20 is a radial section view of a third embodiment of the present invention taken at the line shown in FIG. 18. As shown in this figure, the pins 9 are disposed in between the longitudinal grooves 6, and both the pins 9 and the longitudinal grooves 6 are evenly spaced concentrically around the BTR and MTR regions of the barrel.

[0075] FIG. 21 is a diagram of the rib width as compared to the rib top space in a first embodiment of the present invention. The mass reduction advantage of the present invention as compared to a conventional structure can be simulated by comparing the mass of a BTR or MTR locking feature (ribs or pins) to a conventional BTR or MTR inner structure. The mass reduction is quantified by comparing the mass of a conventional “solid” MTR to the interlocking ribs (INR) embodiment described above (FIGS. 6-10) based on geometric feature size:

Rib Ratio=W.sub.rib/W.sub.top

The W.sub.rib and W.sub.top parameters are defined in FIG. 21; however, FIG. 21 depicts an embodiment in which the ribs 5 are of a constant diameter, and the longitudinal grooves 6 are tapered (that is, wider at the top than at the bottom).

[0076] FIG. 22 is a graph illustrating the relationship between mass ratio M.sub.INR/M.sub.CONV and rib ratio W.sub.Rib/W.sub.Top. The mass ratio of the interlocking rib features to the conventional BTR or MTR region is defined as:

Mass Ratio=M.sub.INR/M.sub.Conv

In FIG. 22, the mass ratio is plotted as a function of the rib ratio to yield the weight comparison of the INR locking feature BTR or MTR to the conventional BTR or MTR. In this example, there is a potential mass reduction of up to approximately twenty-five percent (25%) at low rib ratio values (˜0.05). The opportunity for further mass reduction is possible at the cost of manufacturability.

[0077] The locking features incorporated at the BTR and MTR interfaces effectively lock the outer composite layer to the inner structure, enabling stress transfer between the two layers of the structure. The INR or interlocking pins (ILP) features are manufactured as part of the inner liner (or manufactured separately and subsequently incorporated into the inner structure), and composite is applied over the inner structure using any number of composite material preforms and manufacturing techniques. The outer composite may be applied over the inner structure by wet filament winding, towpreg filament winding, wrapping with a unidirectional prepreg textile or braid, or by wrapping with an unimpregnated dry reinforcement (fiber, fabric, or weave), followed by an infusion with a suitable resin. After application of the composite preform over the inner structure and INR or ILP features, the composite is processed as required to create a suitable structural material. The outer composite layer may be molded to its final net shape or machined to dimension requirements and, if necessary, finished with any additional functional layers, protective coverings, or cosmetic coatings. After processing of the composite outer layer, the material possesses its ultimate strength and stiffness characteristics and is fully integrated into the locking features of the inner structure, providing a high-strength joint.

[0078] Stress simulations and analysis performed using SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP 5.0 and ANSYS 2022 R5 were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the INR features on stress transfer between the inner structure and outer composite layer. Stress simulations were performed for a cylindrical firearm barrel possessing a conventional inner structure without locking features and a cylindrical barrel incorporating INR locking features to an identical geometric body. Both simulations were performed using identical steel alloy and composite properties and an identical composite layup. Comparing the benefits of INR features at the MTR interface, a 10,000 lb representative muzzle brake force (accurate for a medium caliber firearm barrel) was applied as a tensile load to the muzzle end of the barrel system, but thermal loads were not applied to the barrel for this analysis. In the control case, the stress field resulting from the boundary conditions showed that the stresses are transferred entirely to the inner structure, with essentially zero stress in the outer composite. Inner structure stress levels to the inside of the MTR region averaged approximately 20.600 psi. In the INR test case, the stress field resulting from the boundary conditions showed that the stresses were shared between the inner structure and the outer composite layer. Inner structure stress levels to the inside of the MTR region averaged approximately 7000 psi, while the outer composite reached stress levels of approximately 4000 psi. Through the application of INR to the MTR region of the inner structure, stress levels on the inner structure were reduced by greater than 65%.

[0079] The locking features of the present invention have several characteristics that enhance the strength of the joint between bodies, namely:

[0080] 1) Increasing the taper of the BTR and MTR using the INR design allows the stress transfer between the layers to be spread over a longer effective joint without adding mass. Because the spaces between the ribs represent material removed from the inner structure, the overall mass of the BTR and MTR can be reduced while increasing the taper length of the BTR and MTR to increase effectiveness at locking the inner structure to the outer composite layer. In other words, the longer the taper (less steep angle) of the BTR and MTR, the greater the surface area on which to place the locking features.

[0081] 2) The INR ribs have locking notches spaced along their outer radial surface to enable the composite to be physically attached to the rib through an interference of materials, not just an adhesively bonded joint as would be used in a conventional BTR or MTR.

[0082] 3) The spacing of the INR notched rib features create a faceted surface plane of the inner structure. In this embodiment, the bottom of the notches in the rib features define a plane that lies below the tapered surface defined by the outermost edges of the inner structure ribs. The depth of this plane below the outer circular surface defines the material interference that enables the high degree of stress transfer.

[0083] 4) If filament winding is used to manufacture the outer composite layer (dry fiber tow, wet filament tow winding, or towpreg winding), the INR and ILP locking features enable a winding path to be designed so that the trajectory of fiber is aligned with the notches and/or pins in the BTR and MTR locking features to maximize the strength of the joint.

[0084] The advantage of the locking effect of INR or ILP is demonstrated by the evaluating the strength of a joint with these locking features versus the adhesive strength of a joint without locking notches. With an INR or ILP locking notch or pin, any stresses between the outer composite layer and the inner liner are transferred directly into the composite material as primarily tensile stresses in the composite material. In the case of an adhesive joint between the outer composite layer and the inner liner, the stresses are transferred between the layers through tensile and/or shear stresses on the adhesive joint. A comparison of the maximum stresses possible before failure of the joint in these two cases illustrates the advantage of the INR and ILP locking features. Advanced continuous composite materials typically have tensile strengths one or two orders of magnitude higher than tensile and shear strengths of adhesive joints. In an advanced continuous fiber composite material typically used as the outer layer composite, the tensile strength is typically 200,000 to 400,000 psi. By comparison, the adhesive tensile or shear strength of a joint between an advanced continuous fiber composite and a metallic liner is typically 2000 to 8000 psi.

[0085] There are no known comparable solutions to the problem of enhancing the stress transfer between dissimilar materials in a hybrid composite structure. Solutions typically employed include mechanical fasteners (e.g., bolts and nuts) or simply relying on the adhesive strength of the joint between the dissimilar materials. Mechanical fasteners, such as bolts, add additional weight, are unsuitable for pressure vessels and tubes, and weaken the structure in some respects since this approach requires holes through the structural materials. Relying on adhesively bonded joints works well in many cases but not in cases in which the thermally induced or mechanically applied load stresses exceed the adhesive strength between the outer composite layer and the inner structure.

[0086] Although the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention in its broader aspects. The appended claims are therefore intended to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.