MEASUREMENT OF MATERIAL DIMENSIONS

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for determining material dimensions of a longitudinal profiled section (2) during a sawing process, in which a saw blade (3) is advanced, the longitudinal profiled section (2) being machined by said saw blade (3) along a saw groove during this time; advancement position data of said saw blade (3) along the advancement path (s) being determined and, during this sawing operation, additional measurement data being determined from the group of sawing force (F.sub.s) or another variable which corresponds to the sawing force (F.sub.s). The invention is characterised in that an actual profile is determined from the advancement position data and said additional measurement data.

Claims

1. A method for determining material dimensions of an elongate profile (2) during a sawing process, wherein a saw blade (3) is fed forward, the elongate profile (2) is, in the course of this, cut by the saw blade (3) along a saw groove; feed position data (s.sub.1, s.sub.2, s.sub.3, s.sub.4) of the saw blade (3) is determined along the feed path (s), during the sawing process, further measurement data from the group of sawing force (F.sub.s) or another variable (M.sub.s) that corresponds to the sawing force (F.sub.s) is determined, characterised in that an actual profile is determined from the feed position data (s.sub.1, s.sub.2, s.sub.3, s.sub.4) and the further measurement data (F.sub.s, M.sub.s).

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the material dimensions of the elongate profile (2) are determined from the actual profile.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the saw blade (3) is rotated and feed position data of a saw blade shaft (4) is measured along the feed path (s).

4. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that extremal values are determined from the actual profile and the material dimensions are determined from the feed position data (s.sub.1, s.sub.2, s.sub.3, s.sub.4) of the extremal values.

5. The method as claimed in claim 4, characterised in that material dimensions of an elongate profile section are determined from the difference between the feed position data (s.sub.1, s.sub.2, s.sub.3, s.sub.4) of two adjacent extremal values.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5, characterised in that a wall thickness (t) of the elongate profile (2) is determined from the difference between the feed position data of the start of the cutting process (s.sub.1) and the feed position data of a first maximum value (s.sub.2).

7. The method as claimed in claim 5, characterised in that a diameter (d) of the elongate profile (2) is determined from the difference between the feed position data of the end of the cutting process (s.sub.4) and the feed position data of the start of the cutting process (s.sub.1).

8. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that tubular elongate profile sections with a circular inner and a circular outer diameter are selected.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the actual profile is compared with a target profile, and in the case of deviations of the two profiles from each other above a specified tolerance, an error message is output.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the feed position data of the start of the cutting process (s.sub.1) is determined and a saw blade diameter is determined therefrom.

11. The method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that from a jump in an M.sub.s characteristic curve, the change in tensile strength (σ) of the material of the elongate profile (2) is determined.

Description

[0020] The invention will now be described by means of two embodiment examples in three figures, wherein:

[0021] FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a tube section that is cut by a rotating saw blade, and of a feed/sawing force profile generated during the cutting process,

[0022] FIG. 2 shows a graphic representation of a torque of the saw blade as a function of the lifetime thereof during a specified same engagement length, using three materials with different tensile strengths,

[0023] FIG. 3 shows a schematic view corresponding to FIG. 1 with three stacked tube sections.

[0024] FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a receptacle 1 of a tube 2 inserted into the tube cutting machine, from which a tube section 5 is to be cut off by means of a rotating saw blade 3. The tube is here a metal tube that consists only of the metal. In FIG. 1, the saw blade 3 rotates in the counter-clockwise direction. The direction of rotation is indicated by a curved arrow. The saw blade 3 is not shown completely but as a segment around a saw blade shaft 4. During the sawing process, the tube 3 is cut along a saw surface orientated perpendicularly to a longitudinal direction L of the tube 2. The saw blade 3 is moved along a feed path s relative to the tube. In the course of this, the feed path s of the saw blade shaft 4 is aligned with a longitudinal axis of the tube 2. In FIG. 1, the saw blade 3 is fed from the top towards the bottom.

[0025] During the sawing process, a torque M.sub.s acting on the saw blade shaft 4 or a sawing force F.sub.s acting on the cutting surface is measured. The sawing process is carried out by means of a CNC controller of the tube cutting machine, so that the position of the saw blade shaft 4 relative to the receptacle 1 of the tube can be continuously determined and feed position data is determined along the feed path s. In FIG. 1, the feed position data of the saw blade shaft 4 is determined and the sawing force F.sub.s is determined and stored. They are graphically shown in FIG. 1 in the form of a feed/sawing force profile.

[0026] The feed-sawing force profile is shown in FIG. 1 to the right next to a cross-section of the tube 2. The sawing force measurement data determined with regard to certain feed position data may be measured for closely adjacent feed position data. The determined feed-sawing force measurement data may be linked together to form a continuous curve according to FIG. 1 using conventional interpolation methods.

[0027] FIG. 1 shows an actual profile determined in this way. The actual profile is evaluated.

[0028] The actual profile of FIG. 1 shows an increase of the sawing force Fs starting from a zero value immediately before the start of the cutting process of the method. The sawing force Fs rises up to a point at which a maximum engagement length, indicated by an upper dashed line along the cross-section of the tube 2, of the saw blade 3 into the tube 2 has been reached. An engagement length is here understood to be a length of a sectional line of the saw blade 3 in a saw groove generated by the cutting process.

[0029] Starting from a first maximum of the engagement length, the sawing force F.sub.s decreases with the increasing feed path s initially due to the decreasing engagement length, in order to rise again up to a second maximum value which is even higher than the first maximum value. The second maximum engagement length is shown in FIG. 1 by a second dashed line located below the first line. The second maximum value is higher than the first maximum value because the second maximum engagement length along the second dashed line is longer than the first engagement length drawn.

[0030] As the saw blade 3 is continued to be fed forward, the sawing force F.sub.s decreases again and drops, after the cutting off is completed at the end of the cutting process of the tube 3, down to a zero value.

[0031] From the determined difference between the feed position data at the start of the cutting process s.sub.1 and the feed position data of the first maximum value s.sub.2, a conclusion in relation to the wall thickness t of the tube 2 can be made by forming the difference t=s.sub.2−s.sub.1. Further, by finding the difference t=s.sub.4−s.sub.3 from feed position data of the second maximum value s.sub.3 and feed position data of the end of the cutting process s.sub.4, a conclusion with regard to the wall thickness t of the tube 2 can also be made.

[0032] By finding the difference d=s.sub.4−s.sub.1, a conclusion with regard to a diameter d of the tube can be made from the feed position data of the end of the cutting process s.sub.4 and that of the beginning of the cutting process s.sub.1. Therefore, the feed/sawing force profile determined in FIG. 1 allows the diameter d and the wall thickness t of the tube 2 in FIG. 1 to be determined.

[0033] The tube cutting machine not shown in FIG. 1 may have a database having deposited therein different types of target profiles which are associated with tubes of different diameters and of different wall thicknesses. Prior to the start of the sawing process, the diameter and the wall thickness of the tube 2 to be machined are input, and the associated target profile is determined in the database. The target profile is compared with the determined actual profile in FIG. 1 either after or during the cutting process of the tube 2, and in the case of any deviations that are above a predefined tolerance, a warning signal is output so as to alert the operating personnel that a tube with a wrong diameter d and/or a wrong wall thickness t has been inserted into the tube cutting machine, from which a tube section has been cut off.

[0034] The deciding factor is the profile of the characteristic curve, which serves as a kind of fingerprint of the tube. The profile of the actual characteristic curve is compared with the profile of the target characteristic curve. In the case of deviations that are above a tolerance, a signal is output.

[0035] The tolerance is selected such that any manufacturing inaccuracies of the tubes 2 of one type will not be sensed but dimensional differences between the types of tubes will. A tube type is to be understood to be the amount of tubes that have, with the exception of any manufacturing inaccuracies, the same diameter d and the same wall thickness t and the same material.

[0036] The tube diameters d of different types of tubes 2 as well as the wall thicknesses t are so close together that they cannot be detected with the naked eye. Using the control procedure it can be retrospectively determined whether a wrong tube type has been inserted.

[0037] In a further aspect, in addition to or instead of the profile determined in FIG. 1, a torque-lifetime profile according to FIG. 2 may be determined. The lifetime St is here defined as the number of sawing processes carried out by the saw blade 3. Usually, in the case of a new saw blade 3 with sharp teeth, the torque M.sub.s will be substantially constant during the initial cutting processes. In the present case, the torque M.sub.s is approximately 230 Nm. As the lifetime St increases, the saw blade 3 will become increasingly blunt and will progressively degrade starting from a certain lifetime St.

[0038] The torque M.sub.s to be applied during the sawing process is on the one hand a function of the sharpness of the teeth, but on the other hand also a function of the material characteristics of the tube 2. In particular, different steel types have different tensile strengths σ in the different alloys, which require different torques M.sub.s during the sawing process. The terms tensile strength and machinability are here used synonymously. If the tensile strength σ is above a target tensile strength σ.sub.soil, the torque M.sub.s to be applied according to FIG. 2 will be markedly higher at the same engagement length, whereas in the case of materials having a lower tensile strength, the torque M.sub.s to be applied for the machining process will be lower. The method also allows the type of material from which the tube 2 is made to be input into the control of the tube cutting machine. From the deviation, which is again above the corresponding manufacturing tolerances, of the actual curve from the target curve in FIG. 2, it can be concluded that a tube with a wrong material has been selected. In FIG. 2, the characteristic curve shows a jump in the case of a change to the tensile strength σ from σ<σ.sub.soil to σ>σ.sub.soil. A comparison has been deposited in the database for certain materials and in connection with the tube diameter and the wall thickness, lifetime profiles have been deposited. The various target profiles are also deposited in the database.

[0039] If the actual profile determined deviates from the target profile by more than the specified tolerance, a warning signal is again output so as to inform the operating personnel that a tube 2 with a wrong material has been inserted into the tube cutting machine.

[0040] FIG. 3 shows the arrangement in FIG. 1 with three stacked tubes 30, 31, 32, from which a tube section 5 has in each case been cut off at the same time. The associated feed-sawing force profile is shown in FIG. 3 at the bottom right. From this profile, a conclusion can be made with regard to the diameter d and the wall thickness t of the tubes 30, 31, 32 in the same manner as in FIG. 1.

LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS

[0041] 1 Receptacle [0042] 2 Tube [0043] 3 Saw blade [0044] 4 Saw blade shaft [0045] 5 Tube section [0046] 30 Stacked tube [0047] 31 Stacked tube [0048] 32 Stacked tube [0049] L [0050] F.sub.s Sawing force [0051] M.sub.s Torque [0052] St Lifetime [0053] d Diameter [0054] s Feed path [0055] s.sub.1 Feed position data start of the cutting process [0056] s.sub.2 Feed position data of the first maximum value [0057] s.sub.3 Feed position data of the second maximum value [0058] s.sub.4 Feed position data end of the cutting process [0059] t Wall thickness [0060] σ Tensile strength [0061] σ.sub.soil Target tensile strength