SHEET GLASS TOOL
20170341199 · 2017-11-30
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A sheet glass tool in which many abrasive grains are anchored in an anchoring layer formed on the tool tip, wherein a coolant flow channel is formed between a first abrasive grain and a second abrasive grain that are adjacent to each other.
Claims
1. A sheet glass tool having a number of abrasive grains anchored to an anchoring layer formed at a tool tip, wherein a coolant flow channel is formed between a first abrasive grain and a second abrasive grain that are adjacent to each other, and when viewed in a flow channel direction of the coolant flow channel, the conditional expression [1] described below is satisfied:
S1/S≧0.35 [1], where S is an area of a region enclosed by a first imaginary line that passes through an apex of the first abrasive grain and extends in a thickness direction of the anchoring layer, a second imaginary line that passes through an apex of the second abrasive grain and extends in the thickness direction of the anchoring layer, a third imaginary line that connects the first apex and the second apex, and a fourth imaginary line that connects a bottom of the first abrasive grain and a bottom of the second abrasive grain, and S1 is an area of a region corresponding to the coolant flow channel.
2. The sheet glass tool according to claim 1, wherein 65% or more of the surface area of the individual abrasive grain is covered with the anchoring layer.
3. The sheet glass tool according to claim 1, wherein the anchoring layer is formed from a brazing material.
4. The sheet glass tool according to claim 1, wherein the anchoring layer is composed a plurality of first plated layers in which lower end portions of the abrasive grains are individually embedded, and a second plated layer that covers the first plated layers and extends to the entire tool tip, and the lower end portion of the abrasive grain is located above a lower end surface of the first plated layers.
5. The sheet glass tool according to claim 1, wherein the sheet glass tool is composed of an increased-diameter portion having a generally constant diameter, a reduced-diameter portion having a generally constant diameter, and a tapered portion for connecting the increased-diameter portion and the reduced-diameter portion, and the anchoring layer is formed on a lower end portion of the increased-diameter portion, on the reduced-diameter portion, and on the tapered portion.
6. The sheet glass tool according to claim 1, wherein the sheet glass tool is composed of an increased-diameter portion having a constant diameter, a reduced-diameter portion having a chamfered groove, and a tapered portion connecting the increased-diameter portion and the reduced-diameter portion, and the anchoring layer is formed on a lower end portion of the increased-diameter portion, on the reduced-diameter portion, and on the tapered portion.
7. The sheet glass tool according to claim 2, wherein the anchoring layer is formed from a brazing material.
8. The sheet glass tool according to claim 2, wherein the anchoring layer is composed a plurality of first plated layers in which lower end portions of the abrasive grains are individually embedded, and a second plated layer that covers the first plated layers and extends to the entire tool tip, and the lower end portion of the abrasive grain is located above a lower end surface of the first plated layers.
9. The sheet glass tool according to claim 2, wherein the sheet glass tool is composed of an increased-diameter portion having a generally constant diameter, a reduced-diameter portion having a generally constant diameter, and a tapered portion for connecting the increased-diameter portion and the reduced-diameter portion, and the anchoring layer is formed on a lower end portion of the increased-diameter portion, on the reduced-diameter portion, and on the tapered portion.
10. The sheet glass tool according to claim 3, wherein the sheet glass tool is composed of an increased-diameter portion having a generally constant diameter, a reduced-diameter portion having a generally constant diameter, and a tapered portion for connecting the increased-diameter portion and the reduced-diameter portion, and the anchoring layer is formed on a lower end portion of the increased-diameter portion, on the reduced-diameter portion, and on the tapered portion.
11. The sheet glass tool according to claim 4, wherein the sheet glass tool is composed of an increased-diameter portion having a generally constant diameter, a reduced-diameter portion having a generally constant diameter, and a tapered portion for connecting the increased-diameter portion and the reduced-diameter portion, and the anchoring layer is formed on a lower end portion of the increased-diameter portion, on the reduced-diameter portion, and on the tapered portion.
12. The sheet glass tool according to claim 2, wherein the sheet glass tool is composed of an increased-diameter portion having a constant diameter, a reduced-diameter portion having a chamfered groove, and a tapered portion connecting the increased-diameter portion and the reduced-diameter portion, and the anchoring layer is formed on a lower end portion of the increased-diameter portion, on the reduced-diameter portion, and on the tapered portion.
13. The sheet glass tool according to claim 3, wherein the sheet glass tool is composed of an increased-diameter portion having a constant diameter, a reduced-diameter portion having a chamfered groove, and a tapered portion connecting the increased-diameter portion and the reduced-diameter portion, and the anchoring layer is formed on a lower end portion of the increased-diameter portion, on the reduced-diameter portion, and on the tapered portion.
14. The sheet glass tool according to claim 4, wherein the sheet glass tool is composed of an increased-diameter portion having a constant diameter, a reduced-diameter portion having a chamfered groove, and a tapered portion connecting the increased-diameter portion and the reduced-diameter portion, and the anchoring layer is formed on a lower end portion of the increased-diameter portion, on the reduced-diameter portion, and on the tapered portion.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
First Embodiment
[0028] With reference to the drawings, a description will be given of an embodiment of the present invention.
[0029] The hatched area of the shank 1 is a diamond bonded portion 10, and a number of diamond abrasive grains 11 are anchored to the diamond bonded portion 10. It is possible to employ artificial diamond abrasive grains for the diamond abrasive grains 11.
[0030] When the surface area of the diamond abrasive grains 11 is defined as 100%, the ratio of the diamond abrasive grains 11 to be embedded in the anchoring layer 12 is preferably 65% or greater. That is, the thickness of the anchoring layer 12 may be preferably controlled so that 65% or greater of the entire surface area of the diamond abrasive grains 11 is to be anchored to the anchoring layer 12. When the anchoring ratio of the diamond abrasive grains 11 to be anchored to the anchoring layer 12 is less than 65%, the service life of the tool is shortened due to degradation in the anchoring force for anchoring the diamond abrasive grains 11.
[0031] The diamond abrasive grains 11 preferably have a grain size of 2 μm or more and 150 μm or less. If the diamond abrasive grains 11 have a grain size of less than 2 μm, the processing speed is insufficient. The diamond abrasive grains 11 having a grain size exceeding 150 μm cause too big chippings to occur after processing. For these reasons, the diamond abrasive grains 11 have preferably a grain size of 2 μm or more and 150 μm or less. When prime importance is placed on the size of chippings after processing, the range of grain sizes of the diamond abrasive grains 11 may be more limited to, i.e., desirably 5 μm or more and 50 μm or less.
[0032] The anchoring layer 12 may be formed from a brazing material. Since the brazing material and the diamond abrasive grains 11 have a high affinity, the brazing material can climb up the diamond abrasive grains 11 to readily form the anchoring layer 12 with bumps and dips that are relatively thick in a region in close proximity to the diamond abrasive grains 11 and relatively thin in a region spaced apart from the diamond abrasive grains 11. The region of the anchoring layer 12 of a greater thickness has a bent surface. This makes it possible to increase the heat radiating area of the anchoring layer 12 that is provided in a region in close proximity to the diamond abrasive grains 11. This thus ensures more effective heat removal from a cutting region.
[0033] The tip end of the diamond abrasive grains 11 is in contact with a glass sheet A so as to form a coolant flow channel CL by a region that is enclosed by the anchoring layer 12, the protruded portions of the diamond abrasive grains 11 protruded from the anchoring layer 12, and the glass sheet A. As mentioned above, use of the brazing material allows a large gap to be formed in a region immediately below the glass sheet A other than the regions of the diamond abrasive grains 11, and the large gap can be employed as the coolant flow channel CL. This allows for sufficiently cooling a region being ground while the diamond abrasive grains 11 are robustly secured to the anchoring layer 12.
[0034] Referring to
[0035] For convenience, adjacent diamond abrasive grains 11a and 11b are to be referred to as the first diamond abrasive grain 11a and the second diamond abrasive grain 11b, respectively. Furthermore, for convenience, it is assumed that the line that passes through an apex 110a of the first diamond abrasive grain 11a and extends in the thickness direction of the anchoring layer 12 is referred to as a first imaginary line L1, the line that passes through an apex 110b of the second diamond abrasive grain 11b and extends in the thickness direction of the anchoring layer 12 is referred to as a second imaginary line L2, the line that connects the apex 110a of the first diamond abrasive grain 11a and the apex 110b of the second diamond abrasive grain 11b is referred to as a third imaginary line L3, and the line that connects a bottom 111a of the first diamond abrasive grain 11a and a bottom 111b of the second diamond abrasive grain 11b is referred to as a fourth imaginary line L4. The apex 110a of the first diamond abrasive grain 11a (the apex 110b of the second diamond abrasive grain 11b) is the portion of the first diamond abrasive grain 11a (the second diamond abrasive grain 11b) that is in contact with the glass sheet A. The bottom 111a of the first diamond abrasive grain 11a (the bottom 111b of the second diamond abrasive grain 11b) is the end of the first diamond abrasive grain 11a (the second diamond abrasive grain 11b) closer to the tool base 14.
[0036] Here, when S is the area of a rectangular region (hereafter referred to as the reference area) enclosed by the first imaginary line L1, the second imaginary line L2, the third imaginary line L3, and the fourth imaginary line L4, and S1 is the area of a region corresponding to the coolant flow channel CL (hereafter referred to as the coolant area), S1/S is 0.35 or greater, and preferably 0.45 or greater.
[0037] Setting the S1/S, which is the ratio of the reference area and the coolant area, to 0.35 or greater can increase the processing speed because of an increase in the amount of the coolant. Furthermore, even when the processing speed is increased, the degradation of the service life of the tool can be reduced because the region being ground can be sufficiently cooled with the coolant. Setting the S1/S to 0.45 or greater noticeably increases the effects of higher processing speeds and longer service life of the tool.
[0038] A description will now be given of a method for manufacturing the diamond bonded portion 10. The diamond bonded portion 10 can be formed by a brazing method. The brazing method will be explained in detail.
[0039] The brazing materials that can be employed include a nickel base alloy which contains 0.5 to 20 wt % of one or more types of metals selected from among, for example, titanium, chromium, and zirconium, and has a melting point of 650° C. to 1200° C. In this case, a layer of a carbide including one or more types of metals selected from among titanium, chromium, and zirconium can be formed on the interface between the diamond abrasive grains 11 and the anchoring layer 12.
[0040] The diamond abrasive grains 11 and the brazing material are adhered to the tool base 14 with glue. The diamond abrasive grains 11 are adhered thereto in a single layer. The amount of the brazing material used can be set so as to increase with increasing grain sizes of the diamond abrasive grains 11 up to the limit at which the diamond abrasive grains 11 are not buried. The amount of the brazing material used can be varied to vary the thickness of the anchoring layer 12, thereby controlling the S1/S that is the ratio of the reference area and the coolant area.
[0041] Next, the tool base 14 to which the diamond abrasive grains 11 and the brazing material have been adhered is vacuumed under a pressure of about 10.sup.−5 Torr, and after that heated up to a temperature at which the brazing material is melted. The brazing material is heated at the melting point of the brazing material or higher, but preferably at as low temperature as possible, for example, preferably within the liquid-phase line temperature +20° C. This is because too high heating temperature of the brazing material would cause an increase in the thermal distortion of the tool base 14. Furthermore, the heating time is preferably 5 to 30 minutes. The aforementioned heating makes it possible to constitute the anchoring layer 12 having a recessed and projected structure with the brazing material climbed up the diamond abrasive grains 11.
[0042] According to the configuration of this embodiment, since the ratio of the coolant area S1 to the reference area S is 0.35 or greater, the amount of a coolant can be increased. This allows for increasing the processing speed. On the other hand, even with an increase in the processing speed, the degradation of the tool service life can be reduced because the region being ground can be sufficiently cooled with the coolant. Furthermore, the cuttings produced during grinding (glass sheet chippings, and tool cuttings) can be readily discharged through the coolant flow channel CL.
[0043] The sheet glass tool of this embodiment was used to try to process the glass cover of a mobile phone. When compared with the conventional tool shown in
Second Embodiment
[0044] Now, referring to
[0045] The anchoring layer 12 is composed of a plurality of primary plated layers 12a (equivalent to the first plated layers) and an embedded plated layer 12b (equivalent to the second plated layer). The lower end portions of the diamond abrasive grains 11 are embedded in the respective primary plated layers 12a and located above the lower end surfaces of the primary plated layers 12a. The embedded plated layer 12b covers the primary plated layers 12a and extends across the entirety of the diamond bonded portion 10.
[0046] Furthermore, of the embedded plated layer 12b, the portion generally immediately above the primary plated layers 12a is formed in a projected shape, and the other region is formed in a recessed shape. That is, the primary plated layers 12a are provided to thereby form a step height on the embedded plated layer 12b, which allows the coolant flow channel CL formed between the glass sheet A and the embedded plated layer 12b to have a greater flow channel cross-sectional area.
[0047] With reference to
[0048] Setting the S1/S, which is the ratio of the reference area and the coolant area, to 0.35 or greater can increase the processing speed because of an increase in the amount of the coolant. Furthermore, even when the processing speed is increased, the degradation of the service life of the tool can be reduced because the region being ground can be sufficiently cooled with the coolant. Setting the S1/S to 0.45 or greater noticeably increases the effects of higher processing speeds and longer service life of the tool.
[0049] The lower portion of the diamond abrasive grains 11 is covered with the primary plated layers 12a, and the other portion (however, except for the apex of the diamond abrasive grains 11) is covered with the embedded plated layer 12b. Assuming that the surface area of each of the diamond abrasive grains 11 is 100%, the ratio of the diamond abrasive grain 11 being embedded in the anchoring layer 12 is preferably 65% or greater. When the anchoring ratio of the diamond abrasive grain 11 being anchored to the anchoring layer 12 is less than 65%, the tool service life is shortened because of degradation in the anchoring force for anchoring the diamond abrasive grain 11.
[0050] The anchoring layer 12 is formed on top of a nickel strike plated layer 16, the nickel strike plated layer 16 is formed on top of a base nickel plated layer 17, and the base nickel plated layer 17 is formed on top of the tool base 14.
[0051] The diamond bonded portion 10 of this embodiment can be manufactured by a two-stage nickel electrodeposition method. That is, the tool base 14 is subjected to a jet of a plating solution through a nozzle to thereby form the base nickel plated layer 17. The base nickel plated layer 17 may have a thickness of 30 μm. Next, the base nickel plated layer 17 is subjected to a jet of a plating solution through a nozzle to thereby form the nickel strike plated layer 16. The nickel strike plated layer 16 may have a thickness of 0.5 μm.
[0052] Now, the primary plated layers 12a are formed on top of the nickel strike plated layer 16 to temporarily anchor the diamond abrasive grains 11, and after that the embedded plated layer 12b is formed by a jet of a plating solution through a nozzle.
[0053] The sheet glass tool of this embodiment was used to try to process the glass cover of a mobile phone. When compared with the conventional tool shown in
MODIFIED EXAMPLES
[0054] A description was given of the shank 1 for drilling holes in the embodiments described above. However, the present invention is not limited thereto, and may also be applicable to a shank 30 of
[0055] Now, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to examples.
Example 1
[0056] In Example No. 1, the diamond bonded portion 10 was formed on the shank 1 of
[0057] In Example No. 2, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 1 of FIG, 1 by a two-stage nickel electrodeposition method. The diamond abrasive grains 11 had a grain size of 40 μm. As the tool base 14, a stainless steel was employed. The configuration of the diamond bonded portion 10 is the same as that of the second embodiment, and thus will not be explained repeatedly.
[0058] In Comparative Example No. 1, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 1 of
[0059] In Comparative Example No. 2, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 1 of
[0060] These different sheet glass tools were used for drilling holes on a mobile-phone glass cover. The processing conditions were as follows. [0061] Glass size: 50 mm×100 mm×0.55 mm [0062] Glass material: chemically tempered glass [0063] Hole shape: elongated hole of 1.0 mm×9.8 mm [0064] Tool RPM: 30000 rpm [0065] Tool feed speed: 60 mm/min [0066] Depth of cut in sheet thickness direction: 0.05 mm
[0067] The number of holes made by drilling under the same processing conditions was evaluated for comparison of tool service lives. When the number of holes formed before the tool service life was reached was 900 or more, the long service life performance was evaluated to be “very good.” For the number of holes being 350 or more and less than 900, the long service life performance was evaluated to be “good.” When the number of holes is less than 350, the long service life performance was evaluated as “poor.” These results were shown in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 SERVICE COVERING LIFE SAMPLE No. S1/S RATIO (HOLE) EVALUATION EXAMPLE No. 1 0.56 88% 4500 very good EXAMPLE No. 2 0.44 77% 850 good COMPARATIVE 0.22 75% 120 poor EXAMPLE No. 1 COMPARATIVE 0.25 69% 160 poor EXAMPLE No. 2
[0068] In drilling holes for a mobile-phone glass cover, the service life of the sheet glass tool according to Example No. 1 was 20 times or longer than that of the tools according to Comparative Examples No. 1 and No. 2. The service life of the sheet glass tool according to Example No. 2 was five times or longer than that of the tools according to Comparative Examples No. 1 and No. 2. Furthermore, from Examples No. 1 and No. 2, it was found that setting the covering ratio (the ratio of diamond abrasive grains being embedded in the anchoring layer when the surface area of an individual diamond abrasive grain is assumed to be 100%) to 65% or greater led to an effectively elongated service life. On the other hand, from Comparative Examples No. 1 and No. 2, it was found that setting the covering ratio even to 65% or greater could not prevent deterioration of service life because the S1/S was below 0.35.
Example 2
[0069] In Example No. 3, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 30 of
[0070] In Example No. 4, the diamond bonded portion 40 was formed on the shank 30 of
[0071] In Comparative Example No. 3, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 30 of
[0072] In Comparative Example No. 4, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 30 of
[0073] These different sheet glass tools were used for chamfering of elongated holes formed on a mobile-phone glass cover. The processing conditions were as follows. [0074] Glass size: 50 mm×100 mm×0.55 mm [0075] Glass material: chemically tempered glass [0076] Hole shape: elongated holes of 1.0 mm×9.8 mm were chamfered into elongated holes of 1.2 mm×10.0 mm. [0077] Tool RPM: 30000 rpm [0078] Tool feed speed: 60 mm/min [0079] Depth of cut: 0.10 mm
[0080] The number of holes made by drilling under the same processing conditions was evaluated for comparison of tool service lives. The evaluation reference was the same as that of Example 1. These results were shown in Table 2.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 SERVICE COVERING LIFE SAMPLE No. S1/S RATIO (HOLE) EVALUATION EXAMPLE No. 3 0.53 90% 1500 very good EXAMPLE No. 4 0.41 71% 400 good COMPARATIVE 0.18 78% 60 poor EXAMPLE No. 3 COMPARATIVE 0.17 72% 70 poor EXAMPLE No. 4
In the chamfering of a mobile-phone glass cover, the service life of the sheet glass tool according to Example No. 3 was 20 times or longer than that of the tools according to Comparative Examples No. 3 and No. 4. The service life of the sheet glass tool according to Example No. 4 was five times or longer than that of the tools according to Comparative Examples No. 3 and No. 4. Furthermore, from Examples No. 3 and No. 4, it was found that setting the covering ratio (the ratio of diamond abrasive grains being embedded in the anchoring layer when the surface area of an individual diamond abrasive grain is assumed to be 100%) to 65% or greater led to an effectively elongated service life. On the other hand, from Comparative Examples No. 3 and No. 4, it was found that setting the covering ratio even to 65% or greater could not prevent deterioration of service life because the S1/S was below 0.35.
Example 3
[0081] In Example No. 5, the diamond bonded portion 10 was formed on the shank 1 of
[0082] In Example No. 6, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 1 of
[0083] In Comparative Example No. 5, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 1 of
[0084] In Comparative Example No. 6, the diamond bonded portion was formed on the shank 1 of
[0085] These different sheet glass tools were used for drilling holes on a mobile-phone glass cover. The processing conditions were as follows. [0086] Glass size: 50 mm×100 mm×0.55 mm [0087] Glass material: chemically tempered glass [0088] Hole shape: elongated hole of 1.0 mm×9.8 mm [0089] Tool RPM: 30000 rpm [0090] Depth of cut in sheet thickness direction: 0.05 mm
[0091] The tool feed speed for drilling holes under the same processing conditions was evaluated for comparison of processing speeds. The tool feed speed was determined to be the limit tool feed speed when the grindstone was seized or could not perform processing any more at speeds greater than that speed or when chippings became 100 um or greater in size. For a processing speed of 250 mm/min or greater, the processing speed performance was evaluated to be “very good.” For a processing speed of 150 mm/min or greater and less than 250 mm/min, the processing speed performance was evaluated to be “good.” For a processing speed of less than 150 mm/min, the processing speed performance was evaluated to be “poor.” These results were shown in Table 3.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 FEED COVERING SPEED SAMPLE No. S1/S RATIO (mm/min) EVALUATION EXAMPLE No. 5 0.60 91% 360 very good EXAMPLE No. 6 0.42 79% 170 good COMPARATIVE 0.20 78% 70 poor EXAMPLE No. 5 COMPARATIVE 0.19 70% 80 poor EXAMPLE No. 6
[0092] In drilling holes for a mobile-phone glass cover, the processing speed of the sheet glass tool according to Example No. 5 was three times or greater than that of the tools according to Comparative Examples No. 5 and No. 6. The processing speed of the sheet glass tool according to Example No. 6 was twice or greater than that of the tools according to Comparative Examples No. 5 and No. 6.
REFERENCE SIGNS LIST
[0093] 1, 30 shank
[0094] 10, 40 diamond bonded portion
[0095] 11 diamond abrasive grain
[0096] 11a first diamond abrasive grain
[0097] 11b second diamond abrasive grain
[0098] 12 anchoring layer
[0099] 12a primary plated layer
[0100] 12b embedded plated layer
[0101] 14 tool base
[0102] L1 first imaginary line
[0103] L2 second imaginary line
[0104] L3 third imaginary line
[0105] L4 fourth imaginary line