SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTICAL AND LASER-BASED COUNTER INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE
20170347058 · 2017-11-30
Inventors
- Matthew Keegan (Arlington, VA, US)
- Mark McElhinney (Tucson, AZ, US)
- Jean Michel Maillard (Tucson, AZ, US)
Cpc classification
H04N23/66
ELECTRICITY
H04B7/18506
ELECTRICITY
International classification
H04B7/185
ELECTRICITY
H04N7/18
ELECTRICITY
Abstract
Systems and methods for preventing image capture and exploitation by optically transmitting a disruptive effect to a digital imaging system. The disruptive effect interferes with the algorithms used to compress and analyze digital images and can be used to disable the imaging equipment or inject foreign code into the imaging system or image processing computer.
Claims
1. A system for delivering a disruptive effect to imaging equipment, the system comprising: an optical transmission source capable of remotely introducing sufficient spatial or temporal complexity into an image generated by the above referenced imaging equipment, so as to interfere with the normal processes of image processing or image compression being performed on the image.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the optical complexity is generated using the spatial intensity modulation of an optical transmission source.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the optical complexity is generated using the temporal intensity modulation of an optical transmission source
4. The system of claim 1 where the image complexity introduced by the system is designed to result in the temporary or permanent impairment of the normal function of the device.
5. The system of claim 1 where the image complexity introduced by the system is intended to cause a memory overflow that injects new or foreign commands into the firmware of the imaging device.
6. The system of claim 1 where the image complexity introduced by the system is designed to interfere with image processing and compression algorithms of images downloaded from the imaging device into a computer.
7. The system of claim 3 where the image complexity is designed to cause the injection of foreign code into the equipment used for the image compression or processing of images generated by the imaging device
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the optical transmission source is a laser.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the optical transmission source is a Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Laser (VCSEL) or array of individual VCSEL elements.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the imaging equipment is mounted on an unmanned vehicle.
11. The system of claim 10 where the image complexity introduced by the system is designed to interfere with image processing of any viewing apparatus, such as video goggles, that is used by the operator of an unmanned vehicle to control the vehicle.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the imaging equipment is mounted on an unmanned aerial system (UAS).
13. The system of claim 7, wherein the quantity of code is received within the optical processing system without detection by an operator.
14. The system of claim 10, wherein the optical transmission system is positioned in a remote location, a spaced distance from the unmanned vehicle, wherein the spaced distance is less than a distance of a maximum range of the optical imaging system of the unmanned vehicle.
15. The system of claim 12, wherein the optical transmission system is positioned in a remote location, a spaced distance from the UAS, wherein the spaced distance is less than a distance of a maximum range of the optical imaging system of the UAS.
16. The system of claim 1, wherein the optical transmission system is at least partially housed within a surveillance and threat acquisition system having a pan-tilt head.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein the surveillance and threat acquisition system further comprises at least one camera, wherein the camera provides a visual image of the target.
18. The system of claim 17, further comprising a control system controlling the optical transmission system, wherein the visual image of a target is communicated from the camera to the control system.
19. The system of claim 18, wherein the optical signal being transmitted to the optical imaging system of the target is selected based on an identification of the type of optical processing system of the target from its visual image.
20. A system for counter intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) comprising: a laser system, wherein the laser system is capable of emitting a laser beam directed to at least one camera mounted on an unmanned vehicle; a computerized control system in communication with the laser system, wherein a quantity of foreign code transmitted from the memory of the computerized control system to at least one camera with the laser beam, wherein the quantity of foreign code is optically injected into the optical processing system through at least one camera; and at least one computer in communication with the optical processing system, wherein at least a portion of the quantity of foreign code is transmitted to at least one computer.
21. The system of claim 20, wherein at least one computer further comprises an processing, exploitation, dissemination (PED) system.
22. The system of claim 20, wherein after the portion of the quantity of foreign code is transmitted to at least one computer, the code causes an location ping having an Internet Protocol (1P) address of at least one computer is transmitted over an internet connection.
23. The system of claim 20, wherein the quantity of foreign code prevents an image captured by the at least one camera of the unmanned vehicle from being transmitted to the at least one computer.
24. The system of claim 20, wherein the quantity of foreign code is received within the optical processing system of the unmanned vehicle without detection by the operator of the unmanned vehicle
25. The method of claim 20, wherein the quantity of code is optically injected into the optical processing system through at least one camera of the UAS using temporal intensity modulation of the laser beam.
26. The method of claim 20, wherein the quantity of code is optically injected into the optical processing system through at least one camera of the UAS using spatial intensity modulation of the laser beam.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0033] Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals, designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0039]
[0040] Within the industry, it is well-known that electronic jamming can be used for countering surveillance using unmanned vehicles such as unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). However, this type of countermeasure has shortcomings, such as the range at which it may be used, as well as problems caused in unrelated nearby systems produced by the jamming signals. The subject disclosure provides benefits over conventional systems for this application by using the optical transfer of a signal via a laser into the image processing system of cameras used on unmanned vehicles, which can be used to disable the onboard imaging system, but also to further inject foreign code into the imaging system.
[0041] The subject disclosure is described relative to unmanned vehicles which may include different types of autonomous or semi-autonomous ground or aerial vehicles. Generally, unmanned vehicles carry other devices, including surveillance devices such as cameras, weapons, and/or communication devices. Referring also to
[0042] The system 10 exploits the image processing software of the UAS camera 10 against itself, through the combined application of laser and cyber technology. As shown schematically in
[0043] Once the injected foreign code is present within the camera executable memory 34, its function or functions may vary depending on the intended actions of the operator of the laser system 10. For example, in one scenario, the foreign code allows the operator of the system 10 to identify the location of the UAS operator during the processing of the captured imagery.
[0044] Other types of malicious code may be used to shut off the camera 30, destroy the optical processing system 34, view any images or other data that have been captured by the camera 30 and are stored in the optical processing system 34, interfere with the operation of viewing goggles that are commonly used to control unmanned vehicles, as well as numerous other functions.
[0045] The combined use of the laser system 40 with the surveillance and threat acquisition system 46 allows for the application of laser transmitted disruptive effects to a camera 20 at varied distances. For example, counter UAS systems are designed to detect and track UAS 20 at ranges of 20 km or more such that the UAS 20 can be detected before they are in a location to conduct surveillance or reconnaissance. When the laser system 10 is incorporated into such a Counter-UAS system, the application of the laser system 40 may not be relevant until the UAS 20 is within the maximum range of the camera 30 that the UAS employs. Thus, the two systems combined may allow for the detection, tracking, fixing, and identification of the UAS 20 before it is within optical range of a surveillance target. The UAS 20 is then injected with code once it is within optical range of the surveillance target.
[0046] To enable maximum usage of the system 10, it is an objective that the system 10 has appropriate size, weight, and power requirements, such that the system 10 can be light weight and man portable. When the system 10 is combined with surveillance and threat acquisition systems 46, it is possible for the combination to include a plurality of optical heads 50 which are positioned at various degrees to cover a setting. For example, two or three heads 50 may be sufficient to cover large installations such as airports, harbors or military bases.
[0047]
[0048] Incorporating the system 10 within the surveillance and threat acquisition systems 46 may provide other benefits, such as obtaining a visual image of the UAS 20. This may allow an operator 62 of the system 10 to identify the type of UAV 22 or the type of camera 30 carried by the UAV. Images of the UAV 22 may be captured by the daylight camera unit 54 and communicated to the control system 60 and the operator 62. For example, the counter-UAS system may employ a camera which will generate imagery of sufficient quality to identify the camera 30 carried by the UAV 22, thereby allowing the operator 62 of the system 10 to refine the optical signal that is emitted by the laser system 40 to better match the camera-resident image processor type. Accordingly, the type of electronic warfare effect or cyber effect may be adjusted for each UAS 20 by selecting a specific type of injected code to be transmitted to the optical processing system 32 of the UAS 20 based on a visual image of the UAS 20.
[0049]
[0050] When the UAS 20 completes its mission and returns to its base, the operator of the UAS 20 will attempt to retrieve the data on the optical processing system of the UAS 20 by connecting the camera to a computer or similar device, such as a tablet computer or a phone. Collectively, the computer devices 82 used by the UAS operator may be known as the processing, exploitation, dissemination (PED) system 80. The devices 82 of the PED system 80 may be in communication with other devices through networks such as the internet 84, which allow the injected code to be transmitted throughout the PED system 80 to many of the devices 82 used by the enemy. For example, the embedded injected code within the optical processing system of the UAS camera 20 may be downloaded unknowingly from the camera of the UAS, where the injected code generates a new command set as the imagery data transfers to a device 82 within the PED system 80. The command can be programmed to tag the device 82 and/or simply crash the device 82, among other actions.
[0051] One particularly beneficial use of the injected code may be to establish a location ping over the Internet 84 to allow the UAS operators' location to be discovered using their Internet Protocol (IP) address.
[0052]
[0053] It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) of the disclosure without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. For example, a modulator 42 may be included within the laser system 40 to vary the optical power of the laser beam 42 All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present disclosure and protected by the following claims.