Inhibitors of the notch signaling pathway and secretion for use in medicine

Abstract

The invention relates to dihydropyridine compounds as inhibitors of the notch signalling pathway and/or inhibitors of secretion for the treatment of secretion-dependent disease, such as cancer or senescence-related ageing, in addition to pharmaceutical compositions thereof and methods of treatment.

Claims

1. A method for the treatment of a cancer in a subject, wherein said cancer is susceptible to inhibition of Notch signaling, the method comprising inhibiting a Notch signaling pathway by administering a compound according to general formula II to said subject: ##STR00027## wherein R1 is one of: ##STR00028## X is H or a halogen and Y is COOCH.sub.3, R2 is a straight chain or branched alkyl group of C.sub.1-C.sub.8, or a carbon ring structure of C.sub.5-C.sub.8, R3 is H or a straight chain or branched alkyl group of C.sub.1-C.sub.6, and R6 and R7 are CH.sub.3.

2. The method according to the claim 1, wherein the cancer to be treated is characterized by a dependency on membrane traffic, secretion or a secretory pathway, related to and/or mediated by wnt secretion, microRNA secretion, CCL2-secretion, ER transport and/or the Golgi apparatus.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the cancer is chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), esophageal cancer, glioma, colon cancer, haematological cancer, colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer or lung cancer.

4. The method according to claim 3, whereby the haematological cancer is a lymphoma or leukemia.

5. The method according to claim 4, whereby the lymphoma is a T-cell lymphoma, B-cell lymphoma or Hodgkin lymphoma.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound according to general formula II is a compound of general formula III: ##STR00029## wherein R2 is a straight chain or branched alkyl group of C.sub.1-C.sub.8, or a carbon ring structure of C.sub.5-C.sub.8, and wherein R.sub.8 is selected from the group consisting of H, COOCH.sub.3 and NO.sub.2.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the compound according to general formula II is a compound selected from the group consisting of FLI-06, FLI-24, FLI-25, FLI-26, FLI-27 and FLI-28: ##STR00030## ##STR00031##

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein X is F, Cl, Br or I.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein R2 is one of: ##STR00032##

Description

FIGURES

(1) The figures provided herein represent examples of particular embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The figures are to be considered as providing a further description of possible and potentially preferred embodiments that enhance the technical support of one or more non-limiting embodiments.

(2) Short description of the figures:

(3) FIG. 1: Chemical interference of Notch trafficking/processing is amenable to automated microscopy.

(4) FIG. 2: Selected compounds from final hit list show distinct phenotypes.

(5) FIG. 3: Effect of compounds on NotchΔE-EGFP, APP and Klotho trafficking and processing.

(6) FIG. 4: Selected compounds inhibit endogenous Notch signaling.

(7) FIG. 5: The dihydropyridine FLI-06 disrupts the Golgi by mechanisms different from BFA or GCA.

(8) FIG. 6: FLI-06 affects recruitment of cargo to ER exit sites.

(9) FIG. 7: FLI-06 induces ER sheet formation.

(10) FIG. 8: DAPT-like phenotype of FLI-14, -15, -19 and -20 at 50 μM.

(11) FIG. 9: Compound effects are not cell-type specific.

(12) FIG. 10: Phenotypes of Notch inhibitors are fully reversible.

(13) FIG. 11: Selected compounds affect somite formation and neurogenesis in vivo in zebrafish embryos.

(14) FIG. 12: FLI-06 disrupts the Golgi not via depolymerizing microtubuli or actin.

(15) FIG. 13: FLI-06 causes dispersal of early Golgi and TGN, but no tubulation of endosomes.

(16) FIG. 14: FLI-06 acts different from BFA.

(17) FIG. 15: FLI-06 inhibits transport of GPI-anchored and soluble proteins and does not cause ER stress.

(18) FIG. 16: Only ER exit inhibitors convert ER tubules to sheets.

(19) FIG. 17: FLI-06 blocks ER-export instantaneously.

(20) FIG. 18: FLI-06 inhibits secretion of secreted alkaline phosphates; FLI-06 kills cancerous, Notch dependent T-cells

(21) FIG. 19: Molecular structure of FLI-06. Thermal Ellipsoids are displayed at 40% probability level.

(22) FIG. 20: Top 7 hit list of compounds.

(23) Detailed description of the figures:

(24) FIG. 1: Chemical interference of Notch trafficking/processing is amenable to automated microscopy. Scheme of the membrane bound reporter NotchΔE-EGFP (a) and its cellular trafficking (b). NotchΔE-EGFP is synthesized in the ER and transported through the Golgi to the plasma membrane (PM). At the PM γ-secretase cleavage releases NICD-EGFP, which is then translocated to the nucleus. c) Scheme of automated image acquisition and quantitation. Fixed HeLa-NotchΔE-EGFP cells were stained with DAPI and imaged by automated microscopy. A nuclear mask and a ring around the nucleus was created and used for determination of nuc, enuc and enuc/nuc ratio of fluorescence intensities. d) HeLa-NotchΔE-EGFP cells were incubated with or without DAPT, fixed and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. e) Quantitation of DAPT dose-dependent enuc accumulation of NotchΔE-EGFP and time-dependent reduction of nuclear NICD-EGFP after DAPT treatment. f, g) HeLa-NotchΔE-EGFP cells were incubated with increasing amounts of monensin, fixed after 6 h and analyzed by automated microscopy. f) Example image of cells treated with DMSO or monensin (5 μM). Accumulated fluorescence in the Golgi is marked by arrows. g) Quantitation of >100 cells±SE. Displayed is the nuc/enuc ratio. h, i) HeLa-NotchΔE-EGFP cells were incubated in the presence or absence of MG132 (1 μM) for 16 h, fixed and processed for fluorescence microscopy (h). i) Quantitation of nuclear fluorescence of >250 cells±SE. All y-axes display fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units. Scalebar 10 μm. j) Summary of the screen.

(25) FIG. 2: Selected compounds from final hit list show distinct phenotypes. Hela NotchΔE-EGFP cells were incubated with compounds (10 μM) for 18 h, fixed and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (a) or lysed, separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted and probed with antibodies against GFP and NICD (b). Tubulin served as loading control. c) Quantitation of NotchΔE-EGFP accumulation and NICD production from 3-4 experiments as shown in (b). Displayed is the SD with asterisks marking p<0.05. Arrows, plasma membrane; scalebar, 10 μm.

(26) FIG. 3: Effect of compounds on NotchΔE-EGFP, APP and Klotho trafficking and processing. a) HEK293 stably expressing APP.sub.swe or Klotho (KI) were incubated with DAPT or compounds (10 μM) for 16 h. Media were collected, cells lysed and both assayed by Western blotting using indicated antibodies. m, mature; im, immature; s, shedded ectodomain; CTF, C-terminal fragment. b) Membranes from HeLa-NotchΔE-EGFP and APPswe cells were isolated and subjected to a γ-secretase in vitro assay in the presence of DAPT or compounds as indicated. NICD and AICD were detected by Western Blotting using antibodies against the C-terminus of APP (top) or antibodies specific for NICD (bottom). c) Quantitation from 5 independent experiments. Displayed is the SD with asterisks marking p<0.01.

(27) FIG. 4: Selected compounds inhibit endogenous Notch signaling. a) C2C12 cells were transfected with the Notch ligand Delta and a luciferase-based Notch-reporter. Cells were incubated with DAPT or 10 μM of the indicated compounds (50 μM in case of FLI-15 and -20) and after 16 h a luciferase assay was performed. Values from DMSO-treated cells were set to 0% inhibition, from DAFT-treated cells to 100% inhibition and the other compounds related to that. b) and c) Compounds (50 μM) were added to dechorionated stage 4 hpf zebrafish embryos and the effects analyzed after 24 h. b) qPCR with primers specific for ngn1. Changes in relative gene expression levels (fold change) relative to the expression levels in DMSO controls are represented as the mean+/−SD, asterisks indicate p<0.01. Each measurement was taken from two independent samples. Each reaction was measured in triplicate. Changes in the relative expression of ngn1 were standardized to the expression of the housekeeping gene ef1a at 20 hpf. c) ISH with riboprobes specific for ngn1 was performed on dechorionated stage 4 hpf zebrafish embryos. Anterior is to the left, dorsal to the top. Magnifications of the somite region (small box) are shown. Arrows indicate larger ngn1 clusters or stronger ngn1 staining. s, sensory neurons; i, intermediate neurons; m, motor neurons.

(28) FIG. 5: The dihydropyridine FLI-06 disrupts the Golgi by mechanisms different from BFA or GCA. a) For structure-activity relationships FLI-06 (1) and derivatives (2 to 7) were incubated on HeLa-NotchΔE-EGFP cells and EC.sub.50 values determined. b) Results from testing compounds using the HeLa-NotchΔE-EGFP cells. c) Structural information on the compounds tested according to the experiment shown in b). d) HeLa cells were incubated with DMSO or FLI-06 (10 μM) for 18 h, fixed, stained with antibodies as indicated and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. e) HeLa cells were transfected with GBF1-GFP, incubated the next day with DMSO or FLI-06 (10 μM) or BFA (10 μg/ml) or GCA (10 μM) for 10 h, fixed, and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. Scalebar: 10 μm.

(29) FIG. 6: FLI-06 affects recruitment of cargo to ER exit sites. a, a′, b) HeLa cells were transiently transfected with VSVG-EGFP and incubated overnight at 40° C. 30 min before the chase microtubuli were depolymerized by incubation on ice and treatment with nocodazole. Concurrently, cells were preincubated with DMSO (control) or FLI-06 (10 μM). Cells were then chased at 32° C. for indicated times in the presence of nocodazole and compounds, followed by fixation and processing for fluorescence microscopy using antibodies against Sec31. a) Overview of treated and untreated cells at selected time points. Scalebar 10 μm. a′) Magnified selected areas from a); V, VSVG-EGFP; S, Sec31; M, merge. Double arrow, VSVG-EGFP in post-ERES compartment, next to an ERES; arrowhead, ERES costained with VSVG-EGFP and Sec31; scalebar 3 μm. b) Quantitation of variance of pixel fluorescence intensity (PFI-Var) in region of interests (ROI) from n=3 experiments as in a). For each condition at least 10 ROIs were measured. Error bars SEM. r.u., relative units. Mean PFI-Var at time 0 was set to 1 and the other values related to that. c) HeLa-NotchΔE-EGFP cells were pretreated for 4 h with FLI-25, an inactive derivative of FLI-06 (see FIG. 5), or with FLI-06 where indicated. Cells were permeabilized and the budding reaction performed with cytosol, ATP regenerating system and compounds as indicated. After the reaction COPII vesicles were isolated and probed for ribophorin I (ER marker), ERGIC-53 and Sec22b (both proteins are incorporated in COPII vesicles).

(30) FIG. 7: FLI-06 induces ER sheet formation. A) COS cells transfected with prlss-KDEL-mRFP were incubated with 10 μM FLI-06 for indicated times and imaged by live-cell microscopy. The inserts are magnifications of the boxed areas. B) Images from cells treated as in A) were scored for the percentage of cells that lost most of their ER-tubules. For each time point 40-60 cells were counted. Data represent mean percentages, error bars SEM, n=3 independent experiments.

(31) FIG. 8: DAPT-like phenotype of FLI-14, -15, -19 and -20 at 50 iM. HeLa cells stably expressing NotchΔE-EGFP were incubated with 1 iM DAPT or 50 iM compounds for 16 h, fixed and processed for immunofluorescence. In all conditions, cells displayed a strong PM accumulation of NotchΔE-EGFP and a strong reduction in nuclear NICD-EGFP.

(32) FIG. 9: Compound effects are not cell-type specific. U2OS cells stably expressing NotchΔE-EGFP were incubated for 18 h with 10 iM compounds as indicated, fixed and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. FLI-14, -15, -19 and -20 cause PM accumulation similar to DAPT, FLI-06 caused ER accumulation of the reporter and in some cells aggregation, indicating that phenotypes of all compounds are not cell-type specific. Arrows, plasma membrane; arrowheads, ER. Asterisks indicate cells where the ER collapsed to large aggregates. Scalebar, 10 im.

(33) FIG. 10: Phenotypes of Notch inhibitors are fully reversible. HeLa NotchΔE-EGFP cells plated in LabTek coverglass were incubated for 18 h with 10 iM of indicated compounds, washed and incubated for indicated times in cell culture medium. Cells were imaged by live-microscopy. ER accumulation (FLI-06) or PM accumulation (FLI-14, -15, -19, -20) of NotchΔE-EGFP reversed after 1-4 h of washout to the normal accumulation of NICD-EGFP in the nucleus, demonstrating full reversibility of compound effects. In addition these data show no gross toxicity of the compounds. Scalebar, 10 im.

(34) FIG. 11: Selected compounds affect somite formation and neurogenesis in vivo in zebrafish embryos. a) Lateral view of typical representative phenotypes induced by DAPT treatment, which were used as a reference to score the effect of compounds. Embryos treated at 6 hpf with 50 iM DAPT resulted in either defective somitogenesis (mild), head and trunk malformation (strong) or developmental delay (delayed). Images were taken at 24 hpf. b) Pie chart showing the cumulative relative frequency of the phenotypes in a) at 24 hpf in embryos treated with 20, 50 and 100 iM of the indicated compounds. c) ISH with riboprobes specific for ngn1 was performed on dechorionated stage 4 hpf zebrafish embryos. Anterior is to the left, dorsal to the top. Magnifications of the developing head (box) are shown. Arrows indicate larger ngn1 clusters or stronger ngn1 staining. t, telencephalon; p, protectum; h, hindbrain; d, diencephalon; tg, tegmentum; vrc, ventral rostral cluster.

(35) FIG. 12: FLI-06 disrupts the Golgi not via depolymerizing microtubuli or actin. HeLa cells were incubated for 4 h with 1.5 ig/ml nocodazole (a) or 2 iM cytochalasin D (b) or 10 iM FLI-06. Thereafter cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against tubulin. a) Nocodazole, but not FLI-06 disrupted the microtubular network in interphase cells and the mitotic spindle (arrowheads) in mitosis. b) Cytochalasin D, but not FLI-06 depolymerized f-actin. Scalebar, 10 im.

(36) FIG. 13: FLI-06 causes dispersal of early Golgi and TGN, but no tubulation of endosomes. Hela cells were incubated with DMSO or 10 iM FLI-06 or 1 ig/ml BFA for 18 h, fixed, stained with antibodies as indicated and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. Endosomes were visualized by adding Alexa555-labelled transferrin on ice and chasing for 15 min at 37° C. in the presence of indicated compounds. Arrows indicated tubulating endosomes, scalebar 10 im.

(37) FIG. 14: FLI-06 acts different from BFA. a) HeLa cells were incubated for indicated time points with 1 ig/ml BFA or 10 iM FLI-06, fixed and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against βCOP and giantin. While with BFA βCOP rapidly dissociates from the Golgi within 10 min, it takes much longer for FLI-06. b) HeLa cells were transfected with prlss-KDEL-mRFP (ER) and B4GALT-EGFP (Golgi), incubated for indicated time points with 1 ig/ml BFA or 10 iM FLI-06, fixed and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy. In contrast to BFA, FLI-06 does not lead to fusion of ER and Golgi. The ER-like staining of the Golgi-marker at 360 min is probably due to newly synthesized protein. c) HeLa cells were transfected with VSVG-EGFP and incubated at 40° C. throughout to keep VSVG-EGFP in the ER. Cells were treated for 4 h at 40° C. with 10 ig/ml cycloheximide and DMSO, BFA or FLI-06 as indicated, lysed and subjected to SDS PAGE. Incubation with BFA but not FLI-06 led to hyperglycosylation in the ER, indicated by the lower mobility in SDS-gels (hyperglyc.). This hyperglycosylation suggests that Golgi-resident enzymes redistributed to the ER in case of BFA, but not FLI-06.

(38) FIG. 15: FLI-06 inhibits transport of GPI-anchored and soluble proteins and does not cause ER stress. a) HeLa cells were transiently transfected with YFP-GPI (kindly provided by Patrik Keller) and incubated for 18 h with DMSO or 1 ig/ml BFA or 10 iM FLI-06. Thereafter cells were fixed and analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy. FLI-06 and BFA inhibit surface transport of YFP-GPI. b) HeLa cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid coding for the secreted ectodomain of Klotho, KlothoS, kindly provided by Makoto Kuro-o). After incubating with compounds for 18 h media were collected, cells lysed and both analyzed by Western Blotting using Klotho antibody. As loading control membranes were probed for actin. BFA and FLI-06 inhibit secretion of KlothoS. c) Hela cells were incubated with indicated compounds, lysed after 6 or 24 h, blotted and probed for BIP or actin as loading control. d) Hela cells transfected with the luciferase-based ER-stress indicator plasmid p5xATF6-GL3 (Addgene #11976) and Renilla control plasmid were incubated with indicated compounds, lysed after indicated time points and luciferase activity was determined. 21 g/ml Tunicamycin (Tun) and 5 mM DTT were used as positive controls. In both assays FLI-06 caused only very mild ER-stress after 24 h. Shown is the average of three independent experiments, error bars indicate standard deviation.

(39) FIG. 16: Only ER exit inhibitors convert ER tubules to sheets. COS cells plated on LabTek chambered coverslips were transiently transfected with the ER-marker prlss-KDEL-mRFP, incubated the next day for 2 h with 10 iM of indicated compounds and imaged by live-cell microscopy. Only the ER exit inhibitors (see FIG. 5a) FLI-06, 3, 4 and 5 showed prominent ER sheet formation. FLI-06+CHX, cells were additionally incubated in 40 iM cycloheximide. Nife, nifedipine; nimo, nimodipine. Numbers refer to numbering in FIG. 5a.

(40) FIG. 17: FLI-06 blocks ER-export instantaneously. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with VSVG-EGFP and incubated overnight at 40° C. 30 min before the chase microtubuli were depolymerized by incubation on ice and treatment with nocodazole. In addition, cells were preincubated for 30 min with DMSO (control) or FLI-06 (FLI-06+30 min pre), or for 10 min with FLI-06 (+10 min pre), or FLI-06 was added only to the chase medium (FLI-06 no pre). Cells were then chased at 32° C. for indicated times in the presence of nocodazole and FLI-06 (except control), followed by fixation. Quantitation of variance of pixel fluorescence intensity (PFI-Var) was performed in regions of interest (ROI) in at least 15 cells per condition per experiment. n=3 independent experiments, error bars SEM. a.u., arbitrary units. Even when added only to the chase medium without preincubation FLI-06 inhibits concentration and subsequent ER-export of VSVG-EGFP.

(41) FIG. 18: FLI-06 inhibits secretion of secreted alkaline phosphates; FLI-06 kills cancerous, Notch dependent T-cells. a) The secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) assay was carried out. Medium was collected and SEAP secretion was measured via photometry. Inhibition of secretion of SEAP upon FLI-06 incubation was confirmed. b) DND-41 cells have activating Notch mutations (Weng et al, 2004, Science 306, 269). The cells were grown in suspension with the indicated amounts of FLI-06 or DMSO control and growth was determined via FACS analysis. Medium concentrations (1 μM) of FLI-06 inhibited proliferation, while high concentrations (10 μM) of FLI-06 killed the cancer cell line.

(42) FIG. 19: Molecular structure of FLI-06. Thermal Ellipsoids are displayed at 40% probability level.

(43) FIG. 20 shows a top 7 hit list from the compound screen. Images from the 352 initial hits were visually inspected and 7 compounds with prominent phenotypes and intact nuclei were selected. EC.sub.50 values were determined as described in the methods section.

EXAMPLES

(44) The examples provided herein represent practical support for particular embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The examples are to be considered as providing a further description of possible and potentially preferred embodiments that demonstrate the relevant technical working of one or more non-limiting embodiments.

(45) Establishment of a Microscope-Based High-Content Screen

(46) To identify novel regulatory factors involved in Notch trafficking/processing an image-based high content screen was set up. To this end a HeLa Kyoto cell line stably expressing an EGFP-tagged, transcriptionally inactive and ligand-independent Notch1-construct was employed (FIG. 1a, NotchΔE-EGFP.sup.15). NotchΔE-EGFP is a direct substrate for γ-secretase at the PM, and under physiological conditions is proteolytically processed to NICD-EGFP that translocates into the nucleus (for scheme see FIG. 1b), resulting in a strong nuclear EGFP-staining in steady state.sup.15 (FIG. 1d). Upon inhibition of γ-secretase with the GSI DAPT, the reporter accumulated at the PM while nuclear fluorescence decreased (FIG. 1d). Importantly, changes in subcellular localization of the reporter are amenable to quantitation by automated microscopy.sup.15. Accordingly, reporter fluorescence was determined in the nucleus (nuc) and in a ring around the nucleus (enuc), and the ratio enuc/nuc was evaluated (schematized in FIG. 1c). Thereafter, the assay design was functionally validated. DAFT-induced accumulation of the reporter outside the nucleus was found concentration-dependent with an EC50 of 0.68±0.2 iM (18 h incubation, FIG. 1e). NICD-EGFP fluorescence in the nucleus decreased with a t.sub.1/2 of 4.7±1.0 h and t.sub.9/10 of 8.6±2.9 h at 1 μM DAPT (FIG. 1e). Visual inspection suggested that the cells were viable at all times. We showed before that with these cells defects in nuclear import of NICD could be quantified by automated microscopy.sup.15. The assay also reliably detected trafficking defects in the secretory pathway. For example, blocking the anterograde transport of NotchΔE-EGFP through the secretory pathway at the Golgi by the ionophore monensin.sup.16 in a dose-dependent manner could be quantified by automated microscopy (FIG. 1f, g). Furthermore, accumulation of NICD in the nucleus upon inhibiting proteasomal degradation by MG132 was detected by automated microscopy (FIG. 1h, i). Taken together, the assay was validated for reliably detecting concentration and time dependent changes in trafficking and processing of the Notch reporter.

(47) After assay conditions were optimized for 384 well plates and automated liquid handling, the NotchΔE-EGFP reporter cell line was screened against the ChemBioNet library comprising 16,671 compounds.sup.17 (summarized in FIG. 1j). Enuc/nuc ratio was computed and the 352 top-scoring compounds were investigated in follow-up experiments. Images were visually inspected for phenotype, and cell viability and EC.sub.50 values were determined, resulting in a primary hit list of 68 compounds. For detailed follow-up studies seven compounds were selected (table 1), none of which had been annotated with relevant bioactivity before.

(48) Selected Compounds Block Notch Trafficking/Processing at Distinct Steps

(49) For a detailed analysis of subcelluar distribution of NotchΔE/NICD the resolution of the HCS images was not sufficient. Therefore, the reporter cell line was plated on coverslips and incubated with 10 μM of individual compounds from the final hit list. After 24 h the localization of NotchΔE-EGFP/NICD-EGFP was determined by fluorescence microscopy. As shown above, in steady state the reporter fluorescence was localized to the nucleus and accumulated at the PM after DAPT treatment (FIG. 2a). Incubation with FLI-14, -15, -19 and -20 caused an accumulation of the reporter at the PM and in perinuclear Golgi-like structures similar to DAPT (FIG. 2a). Nuclear NICD-EGFP fluorescence did not decrease to the extent observed for DAPT, suggesting the compounds are less effective than DAPT. Indeed, strong reduction of nuclear NICD-EGFP fluorescence and concomitant accumulation at the PM was achieved after incubation with 50 μM of FLI-14, -15, -19 and -20. (FIG. 8). FLI-06 treatment resulted in reduced nuclear fluorescence and localization in intracellular membranes. Other compounds did not alter the reporter localization in this primary validation (FIG. 2a, FLI-13, FLI-16).

(50) Next, lysates of HeLa NotchΔE-EGFP cells treated with compounds were analyzed for processing of NotchΔE-EGFP by Western blot using antibodies specific for EGFP and NICD (FIG. 2b, c). The GFP antibody detected both the uncleaved reporter NotchΔE-EGFP and the γ-secretase product NICD-EGFP, whereas the NICD-specific antibody specifically detected cleaved NICD-EGFP. Treatment of cells with FLI-06, -14, -15, -19 and -20 resulted in accumulation of NotchΔE-EGFP. Concomitantly, FLI-06, -14, -15 and -20 resulted in decreased NICD-EGFP production. FLI-13 and FLI-16 had no influence on NotchΔE-EGFP processing. The observed effects were not cell type specific, as they were also apparent in U2OS cells stably expressing NotchΔE-EGFP (FIG. 9). Live-cell microscopy after wash-out of the components indicated that phenotypes of FLI-06, -14, -15, -19 and -20 were fully reversible within 1-4 h, which also indicates that the compounds are not acutely toxic in cells (FIG. 10).

(51) Four Compounds are γ-Secretase Inhibitors

(52) The accumulation of NotchΔE-EGFP at the PM and the reduction of NICD-EGFP in the nucleus suggested that FLI-14, -15, -19 and -20 affected γ-secretase processing. γ-secretase has many substrates besides Notch, most prominently the amyloid precursor protein APP, for review see.sup.2. To test if the compounds that affected NotchΔE-EGFP processing also affected APP processing, HEK293 cells were used that stably expressed APP.sub.swe, a mutated APP that yields robust amounts of Aβ.sup.18. Aβ in the cell supernatant was weakly reduced after treatment with FLI-15 and -20 but essentially disappeared after treatment with FLI-06 and FLI-14, similar to the GSI DAPT (FIG. 3a). Likewise, APP.sub.CTF, the direct substrate of γ-secretase, accumulated in FLI-14, -15 and -20 treated cells, consistent with the effects on Aβ, In FLI-06 treated cells no APP.sub.CTF accumulated despite strongly reduced Aβ secretion suggesting that APP is not cleaved by β-secretase. All other compounds had no effect on APP.sub.CTF or Aβ. When analyzing APP and APPs, the shedded ectodomain of APP processed by α- and β-secretase.sup.19, we observed that FLI-06, but not the other compounds changed the glycosylation pattern of APP and abolished the shedding of APPs. FLI-16, -19 and -20 reduced APPs secretion (FIG. 3a).

(53) To test whether FLI-06 affected other membrane proteins, Klotho, a type I protein processed like APP and Notch.sup.20, was analyzed. Treatment of HEK293 cells stably expressing Klotho with FLI-06, but not with the other compounds, resulted in aberrant glycosylation different from the normal immature and mature forms of Klotho (FIG. 3a). The mature, complex-glycosylated post-Golgi form of Klotho was strongly reduced, suggesting that FLI-06 affected the trafficking of Klotho. Likewise, when shedded Klotho.sub.s derived from α- and β-secretase cleavage was assayed, FLI-06 but not the other compounds led to a strong reduction of Klotho.sub.s in the medium, suggesting that FLI-06 inhibited cell surface transport (FIG. 3a). These data suggested that FLI-14, -15, -19 and -20 acted on γ-secretase, whereas FLI-06 probably acted by interfering with transport in the secretory pathway. To analyze γ-secretase activity, in vitro assays using isolated membranes were performed (FIG. 3b, c). Production of NICD-EGFP and AICD (APP intracellular domain) were assayed. Both were produced in vitro at 37° C. but not at 4° C., and their production was inhibited by DAPT. Among the tested compounds, only FLI-15 and FLI-20 clearly reduced NICD-EGFP and AICD production, suggesting that they acted as direct, non-substrate selective γ-secretase inhibitors. In contrast, FLI-06, -14 and -19 did not affect γ-secretase in isolated membranes (FIG. 3b, c). FLI-13 and -16, shown not to be active in the cellular assays, also did not affect in vitro γ-secretase activity. Taken together, these data suggest that (i) FLI-15 and -20 inhibited γ-secretase in cells and in vitro, (ii) FLI-14 and -19 inhibited Notch and APP processing in cells, but not γ-secretase in vitro and (iii) FLI-06 affected general transport through the secretory pathway.

(54) Effects of Compounds on Endogenous Notch Signaling

(55) We wanted to test whether the results obtained with the NotchΔE-EGFP construct are relevant for endogenous Notch signaling. Therefore we made use of C2C12 cells, a well established model for muscle development that expresses endogenous Notch.sup.21,22. After stimulating endogenous Notch signaling by transfecting the Notch ligand Delta, Notch activity was measured by a luciferase assay using a Notch reporter.sup.15 in the presence or absence of compounds (FIG. 4a). FLI-06, -14 and -16 strongly, and FLI-19 considerably inhibited endogenous Notch signaling at 10 μM, similar to DAPT. FLI-15 and -20 hardly affected Notch signaling at 10 μM, but remarkably at 50 μM (FIG. 4a, only 50 μM values are shown). Next, we tested whether selected compounds would affect Notch signaling in vivo. To this end the zebrafish Danio rerio was used because of its versatility to study early developmental processes and because it shows a distinct Notch phenotype in somitogenesis and neurogenesis when treated with GSI.sup.23,24. Compounds were added to dechorionated stage 4 hpf zebrafish embryos and the effects were analyzed after 24 h by morphological inspection of somite formation. Phenotypes were ranked to four categories, normal somites, mild somite defects, strong somite defects and developmental delay. All compounds induced distinct Notch phenotypes similar to DAPT (FIG. 11a, b). As an additional parameter we decided to analyze Notch-dependent genes involved in neurogenesis. Primary neurogenesis in zebrafish involves the selection of neuroblasts (repressed by Notch) from proneural clusters (Notch expressing cells), a process regulated in a negative manner by Notch-dependent lateral inhibition.sup.25. Accordingly, neuroblast cells that express the neuronal specification factor neurogenin (ngn1.sup.26) became more abundant when Notch signaling was impaired, for instance upon DAPT treatment.sup.23,27. qPCR analyses on mRNA extracted from equivalent sets of embryos was performed for ngn1 expression (FIG. 4b). Upon treatment with DAPT, FLI-06, -14, -15 and -20 ngn1 mRNA levels were significantly increased, while treatment with FLI-16 and -19 did not induce significant changes in ngn1 mRNA levels. To confirm the data obtained by qPCR, whole-mount in-situ hybridizations (ISH) using an ngn1 specific riboprobe were performed (FIG. 4c, FIG. 11c). ISH indicated that most of the embryos (<75%, n=10-16 per condition) treated with DAPT or FLI-06, -14, -15 and -20 displayed expanded and denser clusters of ngn1 positive cells along the spinal cord, mostly in the motor neuron layer, compared to DMSO-treated control embryos (FIG. 4c). Likewise, ngn1 positive cell clusters in the developing brain of DAPT as well as FLI-06, -14, -15 and -20 treated embryos were found differentially expanded compared to DMSO controls (FIG. 11c). In contrast, the size of ngn1 positive clusters was reduced in FLI-16 and increased in FLI-19 treated embryos, although both did not induce changes in qPCR analyses. Taken together, FLI-06, -14, -15, -19 and -20 inhibited endogenous Notch signaling in vitro and in vivo, corroborating the NotchΔE-EGFP reporter data.

(56) Small Molecule Hit Validation

(57) From the above experiments, the dihydropyridine FLI-06 (1) emerged as a prominent hit compound with a novel mode of action. In order to confirm the small molecule's structure, it was independently re-synthesized de-novo, purified by re-crystallization, and stringently characterized by X-ray crystallography. This substance was found to be equally active as the initial screening hit. The clinically established Ca.sup.2+-Channel blockers nifepidine (ortho-NO.sub.2 group—not encompassed by the chemical formula of the present invention) and nimopidine (meta-NO.sub.2 group—also not encompassed by the chemical formula of the present invention), two structurally related 1,4-dihydropyridines, were tested alongside and found completely inactive in our assay systems, showing that concomitant modulation of Ca.sup.2+-signaling events is not causal for the observed phenotype (FIG. 5a).

(58) Preliminary SAR studies were then executed using a combination of compound acquisition and dedicated synthesis in order to gain insight into the specificity of compound activity, and to ensure that potentially metabolically labile structural elements (NO.sub.2 group, dihydropyridine ring) did not interfere with the phenotype observed. Activity was measured by determining enuc/nuc ratios in NotchΔE-EGFP cells (FIG. 5a). Longer or lipophilic substituents at position R2 according to formula I of the present invention were found to be preferred for activity (Pent (3; FLI-27), cHex (1, 5; FLI-06, FLI-25) and cHept (4; FLI-28)), whilst the iso-pr group also showed the desired effect. Compound 4 (FLI-28) was twice as active as compound 1 (FLI-06).

(59) The 4-NO.sub.2 group is a preferred substituent and may be important for the observed phenotype due to rendering its metabolic turnover unlikely. Conversion of the pendant keto group into an O-alkyl oxime again generated an entirely inactive substance (compound 6—not encompassed by the chemical formula of the present invention). Surprisingly, FLI-06 exerted a very unique effect in cells with a mode of action unrelated to known targets of dihydropyridine scaffolds.

(60) Further comparisons were carried out using several compounds of the prior art in order to assess whether the known compounds exhibited the desired functional properties according to the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5b, the compounds HPI-1 from WO 2009/102864, compounds C3, C4 and C5 from WO 2008/103470 and compound ST216093 from WO 2008/070875 were tested in NotchΔE-EGFP cells. Compound E is provided as a positive control.

(61) The specific structures of the compounds of the prior art are shown in FIG. 5c. The compounds HPI-1, C3, C4 and C5 show no activity using the assay of the present invention. The compound ST216093 does however show the desired activity. ST216093 has previously only been disclosed with respect to the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, and is disclosed in WO 2008/070875 as lacking any activity.

(62) FLI-06 Leads to Disruption of the Golgi Apparatus Differently than BFA

(63) At this stage, we intended to investigate the cellular activity of the dihydropyridine FLI-06 in more detail, namely the aberrant accumulation of NotchΔE-EGFP in intracellular membranes (FIG. 2a). The aberrant glycosylation pattern of APP and Klotho as well as their reduced ectodomain shedding (FIG. 3a) suggested that FLI-06 interfered negatively with the secretory pathway. Strikingly, immunofluorescence analysis of HeLa cells with markers for ER (calnexin) and the Golgi (giantin) revealed that FLI-06 caused a complete disruption of the Golgi while the ER, at least when imaged at this resolution, seemed largely unaffected (FIG. 5d). Disruption of the Golgi after FLI-06 treatment could be caused by disassembly of the microtubules.sup.28 or by interfering with membrane trafficking in the early secretory pathway, similar to Brefeldin A (BFA.sup.29) or Golgicide A (GCA.sup.30).

(64) In order to discriminate between these alternatives, cells were incubated with FLI-06 or the microtubule-depolymerizing agent nocodazole and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy (FIG. 12a). While after nocodazole treatment the microtubule network was almost completely disintegrated and mitotic spindles were absent in dividing cells, in both treated as well as non-treated cells a fully intact microtubular cytoskeleton and mitotic spindles were observed. Actin polymerization and distribution remained unaffected, which suggested that FLI-06 does not act on the cytoskeleton (FIG. 12b). Similar to BFA, FLI-06 caused dispersal of the cis-Golgi marker GM130 and of the trans-Golgi network (TGN) marker TGN46 throughout the cytosol (FIG. 13). Both FLI-06 and BFA did not affect endocytosis in a transferrin uptake assay. However, in contrast to BFA, FLI-06 did not cause tubulation of endosomes (FIG. 13). Another striking difference to BFA was observed when we assessed the dispersal of βCOP, a component of the COPI-derived coatomer complex.sup.31. While in BFA-treated cells the Golgi-like juxtanuclear βCOP staining was already lost after 10 min, it took 30-40 min in FLI-06-treated cells (FIG. 14a). In contrast to BFA, treatment with FLI-06 did not lead to fusion of ER and Golgi (FIG. 14b). Again in contrast to BFA, FLI-06 did not cause a hyperglycosylation of VSVG-EGFP (FIG. 14c), consistent with the observation that Golgi-resident enzymes did not redistribute into the ER. BFA acts by inhibiting several Arf-GEFs involved in various trafficking steps in the secretory pathway.sup.32,33. Golgicide A (GCA) inhibits only GBF1, the Arf-GEF acting on the early secretory pathway.sup.30. To test whether FLI-06 acts on GBF1, HeLa cells were transfected with GBF1-GFP.sup.34 and treated with BFA, GCA and FLI-06, respectively (FIG. 5e). In untreated cells GBF1-GFP displayed a cytosolic distribution, while in BFA- and GCA-treated cells it is recruited to the fragmented Golgi. In contrast, in FLI-06 treated cells GBF1-GFP displayed the distribution of control cells, suggesting that FLI-06 does not act on GBF1 and therefore different from BFA or GCA. We also noted that BFA and GCA, but not FLI-06 caused ER-stress as indicated by up-regulation of the ER-resident chaperone BIP and ATF6 luciferase assay (FIG. 15c, d). Taken together, these data suggested that the dispersal of the Golgi caused by FLI-06 is not mediated by depolymerizing microtubuli and differs from a BFA-like mechanism.

(65) FLI-06 Inhibits Cargo-Recruitment to ER Exit Sites

(66) The differences between FLI-06 and BFA or GCA-treated cells prompted us to analyze the effect of FLI-06 on the first sorting/budding station in the early secretory pathway, the ER exit sites (ERES). FLI-06 globally affects secretory transport of transmembrane (FIG. 3a), secretory and GFP-anchored proteins (FIG. 15a, b). Therefore, we selected the temperature-sensitive VSVG-tsO45-mutant tagged with GFP (VSVG-EGFP.sup.35) as general reporter for secretory transport. VSVG-EGFP at 40° C. is misfolded and accumulates in the ER. Upon shifting to the permissive temperature (32° C.), a wave of VSVG-EGFP is exported from the ER and can be followed in real-time.sup.35,36. VSVG-EGFP was transfected in HeLa cells, incubated at 40° C. to accumulate it in the ER, and released to ERES by shifting to 32° C. in the presence and absence of FLI-06 (FIG. 6a). To slow down export from ERES, cells were additionally incubated with nocodazole.sup.37, which induces depolymerization of microtubuli but does not inhibit ER export. As described before.sup.37, shifting untreated cells to the permissive temperature resulted in the accumulation of VSVG-EGFP in ERES, visualized by colocalization with the ERES marker Sec31a (FIG. 6a, a′, 30 min, arrowheads). After 85 min most of VSVG-EGFP had left the ER and ERES and accumulated in post-ERES compartments devoid of Sec31a (FIG. 6a′, 85 min, double arrows). In sharp contrast, in cells incubated with FLI-06, VSVG-EGFP remained diffusively distributed in the ER and almost no colocalization with Sec31a was observed after 30 min. After 85 min some weak accumulation of VSVG-EGFP in ERES was apparent (FIG. 6a, a′, 85 min, arrowheads). Quantitation of the variance of pixel fluorescence intensity according to Dukhovny et al..sup.37 supported the observation that in control cells VSVG-EGFP rapidly enters and leaves ERES, whereas in FLI-06 treated cells the recruitment to ERES is strongly reduced (FIG. 6b). Cells shown in FIG. 6 were pretreated with FLI-06 at 40° C. for 30 min, to ensure maximal inhibition. To get an initial idea on the velocity of FLI-06 action, cells transfected with VSVG-EGFP were pretreated for 30 or 10 min prior to the 32° C. chase, or FLI-06 was only added to the chase medium. In both cases ER export was inhibited to the same extend as with the 30 min preincubation, indicating that FLI-06 acts instantaneously on ER export (FIG. 16). Interestingly, although no VSVG-EGFP and presumably no other cargo was recruited, Sec31a puncta were still observed after FLI-06 treatment (FIG. 6a). The immunofluorescence data on VSVG-EGFP suggested that FLI-06 acted on a pre-ERES step, such as cargo recruitment. Therefore, it should not affect COPII budding from ERES. To test this hypothesis, a well-established in vitro budding assay using permeabilized cells, rat liver cytosol and an ATP regenerating system was employed. In this assay ERGIC-53 and Sec22b served as markers for proteins incorporated into COPII vesicles and ribophorin I as a marker for an ER-resident protein.sup.38. This assay demonstrated that FLI-06 did not inhibit the COPII budding reaction when added directly to the assay (FIG. 6c), whereas H89, a known inhibitor of Sar1-mediated ER-export.sup.39, completely blocked formation of COPII vesicles. In contrast, when cells were pretreated with FLI-06 for 4 hours, the budding of COPII vesicles was slightly inhibited in the absence of FLI-06 and strongly in the presence of 100 μM FLI-06. As a control, all other cells were pretreated with FLI-25, an inactive derivative of FLI-06 (see FIG. 5a). When added to the budding reaction, neither 10 nor 100 μM of FLI-25 had an effect on the in vitro COPII budding reaction. In summary, these data suggest that FLI-06 inhibits ER-export at a pre-ERES step, potentially at the stage of cargo recruitment. They establish FLI-06 as the first small molecule probe decisively affecting this early step in the secretory pathway.

(67) FLI-06 Converts Tubular ER to Sheets

(68) We noted a morphological change of the ER upon FLI-06 incubation that was difficult to capture in fixed cells. Live-cell imaging was therefore performed in COS cells transfected with the ER marker prlss-KDEL-mRFP (supp. Ref 3) and FLI-06 was added for 120 min (FIG. 7a). After 120 min almost all cells had no detectable ER-tubules anymore and instead were filled with large sheet-like structures. Sheet-formation started after 5-10 min and had a t.sub.1/2 of about 14 min (FIG. 7b). To test whether the morphological change is related to the inhibition of ER exit, next our set of FLI-06 derivatives was tested. Only FLI-06, 3, 4 and 5, those derivatives that were inhibiting ER exit, also elicited the tubule-to-sheets phenotype, strongly suggesting that both effects are related (FIG. 17). In addition, incubating cells with FLI-06 and cycloheximide demonstrated that the sheet formation is not the result of cargo accumulation in the ER (FIG. 17). Because ER exit inhibition precedes sheet formation, the data suggested that sheet formation is not causative for the ER exit block. Rather, the ER-sheets are indicative for structural changes, maybe initiated within ERES, that inhibit ER exit.

(69) FLI-06 Inhibits Secretion of Secreted Alkaline Phosphates

(70) In order to confirm the inhibitory effect of FLI-06 on secretion we transfected HeLa cells with a plasmid encoding a secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP). We collected the medium and measured SEAP secretion via photometry and could confirm inhibition of secretion of SEAP upon FLI-06 incubation (FIG. 18a).

(71) FLI-06 Kills Cancerous T-Cells

(72) To test whether FLI-06 would ultimately be useful to treat cancerous diseases we incubated DND-41 cells having a Notch heterodimerization domain that leads to hyperactive Notch signaling (Weng et al, Science, 2004) with FLI-06. 10 μM FLI-06 caused total cell death after 4 days while 1 μM FLI-06 inhibited proliferation of DND-41 cells (FIG. 18b).

(73) Discussion of the Experimental Examples

(74) The identification of small compounds specifically modulating a biological process constitutes a key step toward drug discovery. Here, we have developed and applied automated microscopy-based HCS to find novel compounds affecting the Notch pathway. Notch signaling is implicated in numerous developmental processes, differential decisions and—not surprising for such an important pathway—is implicated in a number of pathological conditions like neurodegeneration and T-ALL.sup.9,40. In the initial screen we intended to focus on trafficking/processing aspects of Notch signaling. We used an EGFP-tagged reporter construct that was transcriptionally inactive. The fluorescence of this Notch-based reporter was quantified in the nucleus and in a ring around the nucleus, to identify hit compounds. It should be emphasized that they were extracted from the primary screening library, and were not further optimized yet. Despite this, FLI-06, -14, -15, -20, and less pronounced -19, did not show acute toxicity on the time scale of our experiments, and clearly reduced endogenous Notch signaling, as shown by reduction of CSL-dependent luciferase-activity in C2C12 cells and by causing somite malformation and neurogenesis phenotypes in vivo in zebrafish.

(75) We found that FLI-06 generally blocked secretion and that the GSIs FLI-14 and -19 as well as FLI-15 and -20 inhibited Notch and APP processing, indicating they are not specific for Notch. Nevertheless, the dominant phenotype of all five compounds observed in vivo was a Notch phenotype, suggesting that future structure-function analyses together with time and dose-optimizations should enable the development of probes interfering more specifically with Notch signaling.

(76) The active probes identified acted on different steps in trafficking and processing of the reporter (schematized in FIG. 18). Four compounds caused accumulation of the Notch-reporter at the PM, suggesting that γ-secretase itself is inhibited or trafficking/interaction of γ-secretase with the Notch-reporter. Indeed, two of the four compounds (FLI-15 and FLI-20) turned out to be novel bona-fide GSIs, but whether they directly inhibit γ-secretase or act indirectly or allosterically remains to be addressed. While GSIs are probably not primary drug leads for Alzheimer disease.sup.41, they show promising therapeutic potential for T-ALL.sup.42. In addition, GSIs proved to be instrumental for characterization of the different subunits of γ-secretase, for example allosteric interaction sites and substrate binding sites.sup.13. Interestingly, FLI-14 and -19 did not inhibit γ-secretase at the concentrations used in the in vitro assay, despite the fact that their application resulted in accumulation of the reporter at the PM and their clear effect on endogenous Notch signaling. Potentially, these substances could affect the recruitment of substrate to γ-secretase, its targeting to the PM and/or endosomes, or the targeting of substrate or enzyme to detergent-resistant membrane domains where active γ-secretase resides.sup.43.

(77) Because of its striking phenotype, namely the accumulation of NotchΔE-EGFP in intracellular membranes, the dihydropyridine FLI-06 was studied in more detail. Related 1,4-dihydropyridines such as nifedipine are widely applied as drugs in humans to treat hypertension and are generally recognized as Ca.sup.2+-channel modulators with antagonistic or agonistic activity.sup.44, but are inactive in our settings. Other physiological activities for dihydropyridines have been investigated, most notably anti-atherosclerotic, hepatoprotective, anti-mutagenic, and anti-diabetic properties.sup.45. Some of these activities could be related to the antagonistic activity some dihydropyridines show on the mineralocorticoid receptor.sup.46,47. While the extent of these effects is known to strongly vary with small changes in molecular structure of dihydropyridines.sup.48, specific activity on intracellular trafficking of a dihydropyridine scaffold was completely unprecedented. Similar to BFA and GCA or probes like the PKA inhibitor H89, treatment of cells with FLI-06 resulted in disruption of the Golgi apparatus. However, our experimental data stringently suggested that FLI-06 acted via a different mechanism. FLI-06 did not affect the recruitment of GBF1 to the Golgi, the target of BFA and GCA. In contrast to BFA, the Golgi did not fuse with the ER in the presence of FLI-06, and the kinetics of β-COP dissociation and Golgi dispersal differed between FLI-06 and BFA. Unlike H89, FLI-06 did not directly inhibit COPII budding in vitro. Further studies with VSVG-EGFP suggested that FLI-06 acted on a very early step in recruitment of cargo to ERES.

(78) Mechanistically, the formation of ERES and initiation of cargo recruitment starts with the recruitment of Sar1 by Sec12. Sar1 in turn recruits the cargo receptors Sec23/24. Finally, Sec13/31 are recruited and the fission of a COPII vesicle is initiated (for review see.sup.49). In the in vitro COPII budding assay pre-incubation of the cells was required to see a block in vesicle formation. This result suggested that FLI-06 does not affect the essential proteins provided by the added cytosol in the budding reaction. At the present stage we hence hypothesize that FLI-06 acts on the level of Sec12 or other currently unknown recruitment factors—or on the membrane structuring events necessary to initiate an ERES. Although no VSVG-EGFP, no NotchΔE-EGFP and presumably no other cargo accumulates at ERES, there are still Sec31 labeled ERES, suggesting that cargo recruitment is not essential for recruiting COPII components to ERES. Strikingly, inhibition of ER exit was followed by a complete tubule-to-sheet transition of the ER. Morphological changes in ER structure can be caused, among others, by disrupting ER-microtubule connections (Klopfenstein, 1998) or by interfering with structural proteins in the ER (Shibata, 2009; Voeltz, 2006). Depolymerizing microtubules did not affect secretion (Rogalski, 1984; Cole, 1996). Sheet formation alone, induced by microtubule depolymerization or interfering with ER-microtubule interacting proteins, does not inhibit ER exit (FIG. 7C) and clearly occurs after blocking secretion. It is not just an indicator of accumulating cargo, and occurs only with FLI-06 and its derivatives that block secretion, strongly suggesting that the two effects are related. ERES are highly curved membrane regions, and we speculate that FLI-06 causes some curvature changes in ERES that inhibit cargo recruitment. Curvature changes spread then all over the ER, leading to the observed sheet formation. Interestingly, while this study was in revision, the small molecule dispergo was discovered (Lu, 2013). Dispergo has the opposite effect since it induces ER tubulation, but like FLI-06 it seems to inhibit recruitment of cargo to ERES. This might indicate that the “correct” membrane curvature at ERES is essential, and shifts in either direction disrupt ER exit.

(79) The activity of the small molecule probe FLI-06 (1) was further validated by resynthesis and focused structure variations (compounds 2-5). These initial experiments on structure-function relationships of FLI-06 showed that larger or bulky alkyl residues increased activity. At the present stage, a p-NO.sub.2 group appears to be important but not essential for compound activity. Metabolic modification (oxidation or reduction) of the scaffold seems unlikely, given the rather narrow activity window and fast onset of activity. In addition, the respective derivatives were inactive. Further compounds according to the chemical formulae described herein have been synthesized (see below for information on chemical synthesis) and experimental analysis is ongoing.

(80) Taken together, FLI-06 is a unique chemical for the treatment of secretion-dependent disease. To our knowledge, FLI-06 is the only compound that acts this early in the secretory pathway, at pre-ERES steps. In addition, and as an additional benefit, FLI-06 does not cause significant ER-stress, in contrast to BFA or GCA, thereby indicating reduced side effects after medical administration.

(81) Methods and Materials Applied in the Examples of the Present Invention

(82) cDNAs and Antibodies

(83) Antibodies and cDNAs used in this work are listed in a table below.

(84) Maintaining of Cell Lines and Generation of Stably Expressing Cell Lines

(85) Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle Medium+GlutaMax (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS. For stable lines, HeLa Kyoto and U2OS cells were transfected with NotchΔE-EGFP with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), sorted via FACS and selected with 100 μg/ml Hygromycin B. Single cell clones were picked and selected based on moderate and homogenous NICD-EGFP nuclear staining. One clone was then selected for further use.

(86) ChemBioNet Compound Screen

(87) The compound screen was performed at the Leibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP) in Berlin as a single screen, measuring the enuc/nuc ratio of the GFP signal. The compounds were applied on 51 screening plates at 10 iM for 24 h and processed for image acquisition and analysis. The Z′ for the individual plates ranged between 0.4 and 0.8 (=0.53±0.14), indicating excellent assay conditions with only two plates falling below that range. Activity was assessed by z-score normalization and samples with less than 150 cells were dismissed from further analysis. For hit validation compounds were ordered from ChemDiv or were obtained by chemical synthesis. For further details see methods below.

(88) EC.sub.50 Determinations

(89) EC.sub.50 values of the test compounds were calculated from serial dilution series ranging from 200-0.1 μM. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5000 cells/well in 100 μl medium. The next day, 100 μl medium containing the respective test compounds was added. Cells were incubated for 16 h, fixed and processed for automated microscopy. For the putative gamma-secretase inhibitors the enuc intensity was divided by the DAPT control and for the trafficking inhibitors normalized percentage inhibition against DAPT/DMSO controls of log 2 transformed nuc/enuc ratios were calculated. Relative activity values were read into “R” (http://www.r-project.org/) and EC.sub.50 estimates were calculated using four-parameter log-logistic fit with the package “drc”.sup.51.

(90) Drug Treatments

(91) If not stated otherwise, all drugs were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Drugs were used at the following concentrations. BFA, 1 μg/ml; Golgicide A (Calbiochem), 10 μM; nocodazole, 1.5 μg/ml; H89, 25 μM; tunicamycin, 10 μg/ml; DAPT (Alexis Biochemicals), 1-2 μM

(92) In Vitro γ-Secretase Assay

(93) For assaying AICD formation, membranes of HEK293 cells stably expressing APP with the Swedish mutation were isolated and incubated for 4 h at 37° C. according to Sastre et al..sup.52. For assaying NICD formation, membranes from HeLa NotchΔE-EGFP cells were mixed with membranes from HeLa NotchΔE-EGFP cells that were pre-treated with 10 μM DAPT overnight to enrich substrate. After incubation samples were loaded onto either 8% SDS-PA gels (NICD) or 10-20% Tris-Tricine gels (AICD), blotted and probed with cleaved-Notch antibody or antibody 6687 against APP C-terminus.sup.53. Chemoluminescence was quantified on a LAS-4000 (Fuji) with MultiGauge software.

(94) Detection of APP, Klotho and their Cleavage Products

(95) APP, APPs, APP.sub.CTF and Aβ detection was as described before.sup.54 using antibodies 22C11 for APP and APPs, 6687 for APP.sub.CTF and 3552 and 2D8 for Aβ. Klotho was detected as described in Bloch et al..sup.20. Chemoluminescence was quantified on a LAS-4000 (Fuji) with MultiGauge software.

(96) Luciferase Assay

(97) Endogenous Notch signaling in C2C12 was determined by a luciferase assay using a 12xCSL-luciferase reporter and transfected Delta as described before.sup.15.

(98) VSVG-Assay

(99) HeLa cells plated on cover slips were transiently transfected with temperature sensitive VSVG-tsO45-mutant carrying an EGFP-tag (plasmid VSVG3-GFP.sup.35). After 24 h cells were transferred to 40° C. for 24 h to accumulate VSVG-EGFP in the ER. Before the chase, nocodazole (1 μg/ml) and DMSO or BFA (1 μg/ml) or FLI-06 (10 μM) were added and cells were incubated on ice for 30 minutes to depolymerize microtubules. For the chase, cells were transferred to a waterbath with 32° C., fixed after indicated time points and stained with an antibody against Sec31 to detect localization of ERES. During 0° and 32° C. incubations 10 mM HEPES was added.

(100) Transferrin-Uptake

(101) For the transferrin uptake assay cells were starved in serum free medium for 1 h at 37° C. Cells were then transferred on ice and medium was exchanged to serum free medium supplemented with 25 μg/ml AlexaFluor555-Transferrin conjugate (Molecular Probes) and test compounds. After 15 min on ice cells were incubated with pre-warmed serum-supplemented medium containing test compounds and incubated at 37° C.

(102) Fluorescence Microscopy

(103) Immunofluorescence stainings were made using standard procedures.sup.55. Imaging was performed on a Zeiss Axiovert200 or an Axio Imager, using 63× 1.4NA objectives and Zeiss Axiovision software. For live-imaging cells were plated on Lab-Tek chambered coverglass (Thermo-Fisher). Images were assembled and processed using Adobe Photoshop. For displaying weakly stained ER-tubules/sheets non-linear changes in gamma-settings were used.

(104) Compound Identity

(105) Identity and purity of purchased compounds was verified by thin layer chromatography and mass spectrometry. Chemically synthesized compounds were spectroscopically characterized.

(106) In Vitro Budding Assay

(107) COPII budding in vitro was essentially performed as described in Kim et al..sup.38.

(108) Zebrafish

(109) Details of zebrafish experiments can be found below.

(110) Statistical Analysis

(111) Means of numerical data were compared using Student's t-test. A difference in means was considered statistically significant (*) with p<0.05 or p<0.01 as indicated. Error bars depict the standard error (SEM) or standard deviation (SD) as indicated. The number of independent replicates is also indicated in the figure legends.

(112) Antibodies

(113) TABLE-US-00001 Antibody supplier, order number or (target/markerfor) species, poly/monoclonal reference Sec31a (ERES) mouse, mono BD, #612350 Klotho goat, poly R&D Systems, AF1819 Klotho rat, mono KM2119 (Supp. Ref 1) actin rabbit, poly Abcam, ab8227 NICD (V1744) rabbit, poly Cell Signaling, #2421 6687 (APP rabbit, poly gift from C. Haass, C-terminus) (Supp. Ref 2) BIP/GRP-78 (ER) goat, poly Santa Cruz, sc-1051 β-COP (Golgi) rabbit, poly ThermoFisher, PA1-061 Giantin (Golgi) mouse, mono Enzo, ALX-804-600 Calnexin (ER) mouse, mono Chemikon/MilliPore, MAB3126 FLAG mouse, mono Sigma F3165 ERGIC53 (ERGIC) rabbit, poly Schekman Lab 2925/2926 LAMP1 (lysosom) rabbit, poly abcam, ab19294 GM130 (cis-Golgi) mouse, mono BD, 610822 GFP rabbit, poly Invitrogen A11122 a-tubulin mouse, mono Sigma T9026, DM1a TGN38 (TGN) rabbit, poly Santa Cruz, sc-33783 3552 (Aβ) rabbit, poly gift from C. Haass 2D8 (Aβ) rat, mono gift from C. Haass 22C11 (APP, APPs) mouse, mono Millipore Plasmid (marker for) provided by prlss-KDEL-mRFP3 (ER) Erik Snapp, Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York, NY 10461, USA [Snapp, 2006 #3402] p5xATF6-GL34 (ER stress Addgene #11976 indicator) pGL4, 74 (Renilla expression Promega control)
ChemBioNet Compound Screen (See Also Table 2)

(114) For the compound screen 3000 cells were pre-seeded in 384-well plates (Corning, Corning, N.Y.) in DMEM+10% FBS with a multi dispenser. The next day, compounds were added from a 1 mM stock library at 0.5 il to a final concentration of 10 iM per well. Controls were added with a multichannel pipette at 21M for DAPT and 1% final DMSO in 50 il. Pipetting was performed with a Caliper robot. The plate layout included 16 wells for each control. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37° C., 95% relative humidity, 5% CO2. After incubation cell culture medium was aspirated and replaced with 25 il 4% formalin for 20 min. After fixation cells were washed once with PBS and nuclei were stained with 51M Hoechst for 20 min. After another washing step cells were covered with 25 il PBS. The screened library was described (ref 17).

(115) HCS Image Acquisition and Data Analysis

(116) Images were acquired on an ArrayScan VTi automated microscope (ThermoFisher) and numerical data were extracted with the Compartmental Analysis BioApplication of the bundled software suite. Compound screening raw data were collected at the FMP and data transformation was performed according to standard procedures (ref 17 and supp. Refs 6-7).

(117) Identity and Purity of Commercially Acquired Samples

(118) The purity of the compounds was tested by using thin layer chromatography (TLC) and mass spectroscopy (MS), which additionally allowed checking the identity. TCL analysis was performed with silica gel 60 F254 aluminum sheets (Merck). Chloroform/methanol mixtures were used as eluent. By UV illumination and iodine staining no impurities were detected. MS was performed on a TRIO 2000 (Fisons) spectrometer in EI ionization mode at 70 eV.

(119) TABLE-US-00002 No. OrderID and Vendor MW Formula m/Z found Purity MS FLI-06 1630-0135 438.53 C25H30N2O5 438 OK ChemDiv FLI-14 C329-0322 512.81 C30H32N4O4 512 OK ChemDiv FLI-15 C548-2756 405.49 C17H19N5O3S2 405 OK ChemDiv* FLI-19 4464-0971 565.70 C32H43N3O6 588 (M + Na+) OK ChemDiv FLI-20 STK164160 383.51 C21H25N3O2S 438 Impurity with Vitas-M M = 438.6 FLI-24 BAS00087237 398.45 C22H26N2O5 398 OK (3) Asinex FLI-25 1630-1646 393.52 C25H31NO3 393 OK (11) ChemDiv FLI-27 OSSL_264545 426.51 C24H30N2O5 426 OK (4) Princeton Biomol. Res. FLI-28 OSSK_158427 452.23 C26H32N2O5 452 OK (5) Princeton Biomol. Res. *The ChemDiv entry contains C15H19CIN4O5S3, MW = 466.02; the correct structure was determined by NMR.
Compound Synthesis

(120) Unless otherwise noted, all commercially available compounds were used as provided without further purifications. Reactions were monitored by TLC on 0.2 mm Merck silica plates (60, HF254). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AVANCE 250 or 400 spectrometers, chemical shifts are given relative to residual solvent signals. Melting points were recorded in open capillaries and are uncorrected. Mass spectra were obtained on a TRIO 200 from Fison or on a FINNAGEN MAT DDQ 710. Anhydrous solvents were obtained following general laboratory procedures (supp. Ref 8). Beta-ketoesters were obtained from 2,2,6-trimethyl-4H-1,3-dioxin-4-one and the respective alcohol following published procedures (Supp. Ref 9) and distilled before use. Ammonium acetate was purified and dried by sublimation.

(121) ##STR00015##

(122) ##STR00016##
Representative Procedure for Dihydropyridine Synthesis.

(123) Loosely following the precedent of Gestwicki (supp. Ref 10) dimedon D (7.1 mmol, 1.0 g), the respective β-ketoester A (4 mmol) and ytterbium triflate (0.32 mmol, 8 mol %, 0.2 g) were dissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile (25 mL) and stirred under nitrogen for 10 min. A cold (4° C.) solution of anhydrous NH4OAc B (5.6 mmol, 0.3 g) in methanol (10 mL) was introduced. After 10 min the corresponding aldehyde C (4 mmol, dissolved in 10 ml acetonitrile) was added dropwise. The yellowish mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight, then poured into water (100 mL) and stirred for one hour. The precipitate formed was either filtered of by suction or extracted with ethyl acetate.

(124) The remaining material was dissolved in ethyl acetate/hexanes and filtered over a short column of silica. The solvent was removed, the residue recrystallized form acetonitrile and dried in vacuo. Transformations were generally cleaner when the enamineoester E was individually formed (Supp. Ref 11). As side products, symmetrical double adducts of dimedone and aldehyde were observed in varying amounts (see supporting scheme 1) and individually isolated for comparative testing (see below).

Ethyl 4-(4′-nitrophenyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate

(125) ##STR00017##

(126) Light yellow crystals; yield: 61%; m.p. 188° C.; 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): ä 8.09 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J=8, 7 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (br s, 1H), 5.16 (s, 1H), 4.09 (q, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.28-2.10 (m, 4H), 1.25 (t, J=7, 2 Hz, 3H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (62.5 MHz, CDCl3): ä 195.1, 166.7, 154.2, 146.2, 144.2, 128.9, 123.3, 111.3, 105.1, 60.1, 50.5, 41.2, 37.2, 32.7, 29.3, 27.1, 19.5, 14.2; MS (EI): m/z (%) 384 (M+) (66), 355 (21), 262 (100), 234 (81), 178 (29), 150 (17), 83 (9).

Cyclohexyl 4-(4′-nitrophenyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (1, “FLI-06”)

(127) ##STR00018##

(128) Light yellow crystals; yield: 51%; m.p. 196° C.; 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6): ä 8.09 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.51 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.94 (s, 1H); 5.16 (s, 1H), 4.69-4.69 (m, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.33-2.16 (m, 4H), 1.80-1.21 (m, 10H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 0.90 (s, 3H);

(129) 13C NMR (62.5 MHz, CDCl3): ä 195.2, 166.2, 154.3, 148.3, 146.2, 144.0, 129.9, 123.4, 111.2, 105.3, 72.5, 50.6, 41.2, 37.3, 32.7, 31.8, 31.5, 29.3, 27.1, 25.3, 23.8, 23.6, 19.5; MS (EI): m/z (%)=438 [M+] (67); IR (ATR, [cm-1]): 3198 (m), 3088 (w), 2937 (m), 1672 (s), 1600 (s), 1482 (s), 1468 (m), 1340 (vs), 1433 (vs), 1171 (m), 1107 (s); analysis calcd. for C25H30N2O5: C, 68.47; H, 6.90; N, 6.39. found 68.7, 7.3, 6.5.

Cyclohexyl 4-(4′-cyanophenyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate

(130) ##STR00019##

(131) Colourless crystals; yield: 88%; m.p. 235° C.; 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): ä 7.52 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H), 5.75 (s, 1H), 5.10 (s, 1H), 4.99-5.12 (m, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.32-2.27 (m, 4H), 1.81-1.25 (m, 10H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 0.90 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3,): ä 195.2, 166.2, 152.2, 147.9, 143.9, 131.8, 128.9, 111.4, 109.6, 105.4, 72.4, 50.6, 41.2, 37.3, 32.7, 31.8, 31.4, 29.3, 27.1, 25.3, 23.7, 23.6, 19.6; MS (DEI): m/z (%)=416 (M+) (24), 334 (100), 317 (20), 278 (37), 260 (9); fluorescence (CH2Cl2): └max.: 432 nm; fluorescence excitation (CH2Cl2): └max.: 371 nm.

Cyclohexyl 2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-4-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate

(132) ##STR00020##

(133) Light yellow crystals; Yield: 33%; m.p. 238° C.; 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): ä 8.44 (d, J=6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (2H, J=6.1 Hz, 2H), 6.32 (s; 1H), 5.07 (s, 1H), 4.60-4.69 (m, 1H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.32-2.17 (m, 4H), 1.83-1.21 (m, 10H), 1.08 (s, 3H), 0.90 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3,): ä 195.2, 166.2, 155.4, 149.2, 148.5, 144.4, 123.4, 110.9, 104.8, 72.4, 50.6, 41.1, 36.6, 32.7, 31.8, 31.4, 29.3, 27.0, 25.3, 23.7, 23.6, 19.4. MS (Micro-ESI): m/z (%)=417 (M+Na)+395 (M+H)+(54); HRMS: calcd. for [M+H]+C24H31N2O3=395.2334. found: 395.2329.

Cyclohexyl 4-(4′-thioamidophenyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate

(134) ##STR00021##

(135) Nitrile 7 (1.2 mmol, 0.5 g) was dissolved in 25 ml DMSO and ammonium sulphide solution (6 ml, 48%) was added with stirring. The pale green mixture was stirred for one hour. Ice cold water was added (100 mL), and stirring was continued for 30 min. The crude product was recovered by filtration and purified by recrystallization from ethanol/water (2:1). Bright yellow needles; yield: 92%; m.p. 231-235° C.; 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6): ä 9.69 (s, 1H), 9.32 (s, 1H), 9.07 (s, 1H), 7.71 (d, J=8.3 Hz; 2H), 7.17 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H), 4.87 (s, 1H), 4.58 (br s; 1H), 2.44-2.12 (m, 7H), 1.92-1.24 (m, 10H), 0.99 (s, 3H), 0.82 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): ä 200.4, 194.7, 166.5, 151.2, 150.2, 145.8, 137.5, 127.4, 127.4, 109.9, 103.8, 71.4, 50.6; 36.5, 32.6, 31.7, 31.4, 29.5, 26.9, 25.4, 23.6; MS (EI): m/z (%)=453 (M+) (18), 369 (9), 316 (82), 234 (100), 190 (11), 83 (15).

Cyclohexyl 2,7,7-trimethyl-4-(4′-nitrophenyl)-5-oxo-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (7)

(136) ##STR00022##

(137) Dihydropyridine 1 (0.436 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in dichloromethane (50 mL) and MnO2 (excess, approx. 1 g) was added. The mixture was stirred until the starting material was completely consumed (TLC, hexanes/EtOAc 1:1). The inorganic material was filtered off, solvent was evaporated and the crude compound purified by column chromatography (SiO2, solvent hexanes/EtOAc 1:1). Off-white solid, yield 90%; 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6): ä 8.26 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.66-4.69 (m, 1H), 3.11 (s, 2H), 2.63 (s, 3H), 2.47 (s, 2H), 1.58-1.20 (m, 10H), 1.12 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6): ä 197.3, 166.1, 163.1, 158.1, 147.3, 145.5, 145.2, 129.7, 129.2, 123.1, 122.6, 74.1, 53.0, 46.9, 32.6, 20.9, 28.1, 26.8, 25.0; MS (EI): m/z (%)=436 (M+) (37), 353 (32), 316 (100), 309 (7), 234 (91).

Cyclohexyl-4-(4′-aminophenyl)-2,7,7-trimethyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-quinoline-3-carboxylate

(138) ##STR00023##

(139) A schlenk-flask was purged with nitrogen and a solution of nitroarene 1 (0.408 mg, 1.00 mmol) in MeOH (30 ml, anhydrous, degassed) was introduced, followed by Pd/C (5% on charcoal (10 mg). Hydrogen gas was introduced (1 bar) and conversion followed by TLC (EtOAc/PE, 1:1). After turnover was complete (2 h) the mixture was filtered and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product was purified by radial chromatography (Chromatotron®) under N2-Atmosphere (CH2Cl2/MeOH 99:1), then dissolved in EtOH (1 mL), triturated with cyclohexane and dried in vacuo. Off-white powder sensitive to air, must be stored below ambient temperature; yield 95%; 1H NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6): ä 7.01 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.54 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H), 5.79 (br s, 1H), 4.93 (s, 1H), 4.69-4.66 (m, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 2.27-2.17 (m, 4H), 1.62-1.24 (m, 10H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): ä=200.4, 194.7, 166.5, 151.2, 150.2, 145.8, 137.5, 127.4, 127.4, 109.9, 103.8, 71.4, 50.6, 36.5, 32.6, 31.7, 31.4, 29.5, 26.9, 25.4, 23.6; MS (EI): m/z (%)=408 (M+) (8), 406 (6), 390 (8), 392 (5), 318 (5), 316 (100), 234 (92), 216 (25), 177 (16), 93 (97).

E-2-(((3′-Cyclohexyloxycarbonyl-4″-nitrophenyl-2′,7′,7′-trimethyl-1′,4′,5′,6′,7′,8′-hexahydroquinoline-5′-ylidene)amino)oxy)acetic acid (6)

(140) ##STR00024##

(141) A solution of O-(Carboxymethyloxmethyl)hydroxylamine hemihydrochloride (2.06 mmol, 225 mg, Aldrich) in water (5 mL) was adjusted to pH 5 with solid sodium carbonate. This solution was evaporated to dryness in vacuo and the residue was suspended in methanol (6 mL).

(142) To a solution of ketone 1 (0.5 mmol, 219 mg) in acetonitrile (8 mL), phosphorus oxychloride (5 mmol, 500 iL) was added under nitrogen at 30° C. and brought to reflux for 3 h. The orange reaction mixture was evaporated at 50° C. i. V. (6 mbar) and dried until odorless (POCl3). The dark residue was dissolved in acetonitrile (6 mL) and freshly prepared methanolic O-(carboxymethyloxmethyl)hydroxylamine solution (6 mL, see above) was added at once. The mixture was heated to reflux for 5 min before all the solvents were evaporated. The residue was taken up with 20 mL of ethyl acetate, washed with water (2×10 mL), brine (1×10 mL), dried with MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. The residue was dissolved in 3 mL of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and stored at 5° C. for 4 days. The crystalline product was retrieved by filtration and dried in vacuo to yield 148 mg of oxime 10. On concentration a second crop of 10 could be obtained by recrystallization from MTBE/n-hexane.

(143) Amber colored crystals; yield: 58%; m.p. 129-133° C.; 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): ä 8.02 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.72 (s, 1H); 5.06 (s, 1H), 4.70-4.60 (m, 1H), 2.23 (dd, J=4, 142.5 Hz, 2H), 2.28 (dd, J=5.2, 16.7 Hz, 2H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 2.33-2.16 (m, 4H), 1.80-1.21 (m, 10H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.85 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 62.5 MHz): ä 173.8, 166.2, 155.9, 154.9, 146.0, 144.7, 137.2, 129.3, 122.8, 105.7, 102.6, 72.9, 70.1, 40.7, 38.4, 36.2, 31.9, 31.7, 30.45, 29.5, 27.1, 25.4, 23.9, 23.8, 20.1; ESI HRMS: calcd for (M++H+): C27H34N3O7: 512.2390. found: 512.2390; analysis calcd. for C27H33N3O7×MTBE: C, 64.0; H, 7.6; N, 7.0. found C, 63.5; H, 8.0; N, 6.9.

(144) Typical side products of Hantzsch-type dihydropyridine syntheses.

2,2′-((4-Nitrophenyl)methylene)bis(3-hydroxy-5,5-dimethylcyclohex-2-enone)

(145) ##STR00025##

(146) Obtained from the representative procedure for dihydropyridine synthesis. After completion the crude mixture was recrystallized from EtOH/H2O. The first crop was recrystallized again to afford the pure title compound. Off-white crystals; yield: 30%; 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): ä=11.80 (s, 1H), 11.22 (br s, 1H) 8.15 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.26 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.55 (s, 1H), 2.54-2.29 (m, 8H), 1.24 (s, 6H), 1.12 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (62.5 MHz, CDCl3): ä=190.9, 189.6, 146.5, 146.1, 127.6, 123.5, 114.9, 46.9, 46.4, 33.2, 31.5, 29.5, 27.4; MS (ESI): m/z (%)=436.2 (M+Na)+; analysis calcd. for C23H27NO6: C, 66.8; H, 6.6; N, 3.4. found C, 66.6; H, 6.4; N, 3.2.

2,2′-((3-Nitrophenyl)methylene)bis(3-hydroxy-5,5-dimethylcyclohex-2-enone)

(147) ##STR00026##

(148) Obtained from the representative procedure for dihydropyridine synthesis. After completion the crude mixture was recrystallized from EtOH/H2O. The first crop was recrystallized again to provide the pure title compound. Light yellow crystals; yield: 61%; m.p. 202° C.; 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3): ä 11.8 (s, 1H), 11.3 (br s, 1H), 8.06 (m, 2H), 7.45 (m, 2H), 5.54 (s, 1H), 2.54-2.29 (m, 8H), 1.28 (s, 6H), 1.12 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (61.5 MHz, CDCl3): ä 191.0, 189.6, 148.4, 140.7, 132.8, 129.1, 122.2, 121.0, 114.8, 46.0, 46.4, 32.9, 31.4, 29.7, 27.3.

(149) Crystal Structure Analysis Data of FLI-06

(150) Intensity data were collected on a Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer using graphite-monochromated Mo—K<radiation. Data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects but not for absorption effects (COLLECT, Data Collection Software; Nonius B.V., The Netherlands (1998) (Supp. Ref 12). The structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXS) (supp. Ref 13) and refined by full-matrix least squares techniques against Fo (supp. Ref 13) (SHELXL-97). All hydrogen atoms were located by difference Fourier synthesis and refined isotropically. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Crystallographic data as well as structure solution and refinement details are summarized in table 3. XP (SIEMENS Analytical X-ray Instruments, Inc.) was used for structure representations. See also FIG. 19.

(151) Zebrafish:

(152) Embryos were obtained from natural spawning of wild-type TüAB strain adults, raised and staged according to supp. Ref 14. DAPT and compounds were applied at 50 iM in E3 embryo medium to zebrafish embryos with chorions torn but not completely removed from sphere stage until the stage of analysis, according to ref 23. Control embryos were mock treated with the same concentration of DMSO dissolved in E3 embryo medium. All embryos were incubated in a 24-well plate (10-15 embryos/well; 2 ml final volume) at 28° C. until analysis and then fixed in ice-cold buffered 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. Whole-mount in situ hybridizations (ISH) were performed essentially as described (supp. Ref 16). Digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobes were generated from linearized vectors as described (ref 26). For qRT-PCR analysis total RNA was isolated from five zebrafish embryos showing similar phenotype using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). In order to discard unwanted or toxic effects, for qPCR those compound-treated embryos were selected that displayed mild somite defects (see FIG. 11). Subsequent cDNA synthesis was performed using the SuperScript III RT kit (Invitrogen), random hexamer primers (Promega) and 500 ng total RNA as template. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of cDNA was carried out using the SYBR greenER qPCR super mix for iCycler (Invitrogen) in an iCycler device (96-well format; Biorad). All samples were measured as triplicates and normalized to the corresponding amounts of ef1a cDNA measured within the same plate. Relative expression levels where calculated using the 2-ÄÄCT method (supp. Ref 18). For imaging embryos were washed twice in E3 embryo medium and treated with a 0.016% tricaine (MS-222, Sigma) solution in E3 embryo medium. Then embryos were embedded in 3% methylcellulose for imaging. Live embryos (20 to 24 hpf) were scored for morphologic defects using an epifluorescence Stereo Discovery V8 microscope (Carl Zeiss). Images were generated using the AxioVision software (Zeiss). Images of ISH were taken in embryos mounted in 70% glycerol/PBST.

(153) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Small molecule screening data. Category Parameter Description Assay Type of assay Cell based, image based Target Notch-trafficking Primary measurement EGFP fluorescence Key reagents DMSO, DAPT Assay protocol Measurement of nuc/enuc fluorescence intensity ratio of a GFP-tagged Notch reporter Additional comments Library Library size ChemBioNet Library (Lisurek, 2010). 16,671 compounds. Library composition Chemical Diversity, Bioactivity enriched. Source ChemDiv (San Diego) through Leibniz-Institute for molecular pharmacology, Berlin, Additional comments Screen Format 384 well microtiter plates Concentration(s) tested 10 μM Plate controls 3000 cells were preseeded in 384 well plates. The next day compounds were added from a 1 mM Stock to yield 10 μM final concentration in 50 μl total volume. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37° C., 95% RH, 5% CO2 and processed as follows. Medium was aspirated, cells were fixed in 4% formalin for 20 min, stained with Hoechst 33342, rinsed and covered with PBS. Reagent/compound dispensing system Caliper (PerkinElmer) Detection instrument and software ArrayScan VTi (Ceilomics/ThermoFisher), CellularCompartment BioApplication Assay validation/QC 352 top scorers, were rescreened with serial dilutions Correction factors — Normalization z-score Additional comments Post-HTS analysis Hit criteria Visual inspection Hit rate 68 (0.4%) Additional assay(s) — Confirmation of hit purity and structure Confirmation of purity and structure was performed for followed-up hit compounds. (See suppl. methods) Additional comments

(154) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Crystal data and refinement details for the X-ray structure determinations of the compound FLI-06. Compound FLI-06 formula C.sub.25H.sub.30N.sub.2O.sub.5 fw (g .Math. mol.sup.−1) 438.51 T/° C. −140(2) crystal system monoclinic space group P2.sub.1/c a/Å 18.0463(9) b/Å 10.4521(5) c/Å 12.3077(4) α/° 90.00 β/° 101.616(3) γ/° 90.00 V/Å.sup.3  2273.95(17) Z 4 ρ (g .Math. cm.sup.−3) 1.281 μ (mm.sup.−1) .89 measured data 12592 data with I > 2σ(I) 4320 unique data (R.sub.int) 5142/0.0359 wR.sub.2 (all data, on 0.1261 F.sup.2).sup.a) R.sub.1 (I > 2σ(I)).sup.a) 0.0516 S.sup.b) 1.147 Res. dens./e .Math. Å.sup.−3 0.255/-0.241 absorpt method NONE CCDC No. 911241 .sup.a)Definition of the R indices: R.sub.1 = (Σ||F.sub.o| − |F.sub.c||)/Σ|F.sub.o|; wR.sub.2 = {Σ[w(F.sub.o.sup.2 − F.sub.c.sup.2).sup.2]/Σ[w(F.sub.o.sup.2).sup.2]}.sup.1/2 with w.sup.−1 = σ.sup.2(F.sub.o.sup.2) + (aP).sup.2 + bP; P = [2F.sub.c.sup.2 + Max[Fo.sup.2]/3; .sup.b)s = {Σ[w(Fo.sup.2 − F.sub.c.sup.2).sup.2]/(N.sub.o − N.sub.p)}.sup.1/2.

REFERENCES

(155) 1 Kopan, R. & Ilagan, M. X. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 137, 216-233, (2009). 2 McCarthy, J. V., Twomey, C. & Wujek, P. Presenilin-dependent regulated intramembrane proteolysis and gamma-secretase activity. Cell Mol Life Sci 66, 1534-1555, (2009). 3 Chen, F. et al. TMP21 is a presenilin complex component that modulates gamma-secretase but not epsilon-secretase activity. Nature 440, 1208-1212, (2006). 4 Thathiah, A. et al. The orphan G protein-coupled receptor 3 modulates amyloid-beta peptide generation in neurons. Science 323, 946-951, (2009). 5 He, G. et al. Gamma-secretase activating protein is a therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease. Nature 467, 95-98, (2010). 6 Mitsuishi, Y. et al. Human CRB2 inhibits gamma-secretase cleavage of amyloid precursor protein by binding to the presenilin complex. The Journal of biological chemistry 285, 14920-14931, (2010). 7 Le Borgne, R. Regulation of Notch signalling by endocytosis and endosomal sorting. Current opinion in cell biology 18, 213-222, (2006). 8 Real, P. J. & Ferrando, A. A. NOTCH inhibition and glucocorticoid therapy in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 23, 1374-1377, (2009). 9 Koch, U. & Radtke, F. Notch in T-ALL: new players in a complex disease. Trends Immunol 32, 434-442, (2011). 10 von Kleist, L. & Haucke, V. At the Crossroads of Chemistry and Cell Biology: Inhibiting Membrane Traffic by Small Molecules. Traffic, (2011). 11 Dovey, H. F. et al. Functional g-secretase inhibitors reduce b-amyloid peptide levels in brain. J Neurochem 76, 173-181., (2001). 12 Shearman, M. S. et al. L-685,458, an aspartyl protease transition state mimic, is a potent inhibitor of amyloid b-protein precursor g-secretase activity. Biochemistry 39, 8698-8704, (2000). 13 Wolfe, M. S. gamma-Secretase inhibitors and modulators for Alzheimer's disease. Journal of neurochemistry, (2011). 14 Zanella, F., Lorens, J. B. & Link, W. High content screening: seeing is believing. Trends Biotechnol 28, 237-245, (2010). 15 Hünniger, K. et al. Notch1 signaling is mediated by importins alpha 3, 4, and 7. Cell Mol Life Sci 67, 3187-3196, (2010). 16 Mollenhauer, H. H., Morre, D. J. & Rowe, L. D. Alteration of intracellular traffic by monensin; mechanism, specificity and relationship to toxicity. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1031, 225-246, (1990). 17 Lisurek, M. et al. Design of chemical libraries with potentially bioactive molecules applying a maximum common substructure concept. Mol Divers 14, 401-408, (2010). 18 Citron, M. et al. Mutation of the b-amyloid precursor protein in familial Alzheimer's disease increases b-protein production. Nature 360, 672-674, (1992). 19 Haass, C. Take five-BACE and the gamma-secretase quartet conduct Alzheimer's amyloid beta-peptide generation. EMBO J. 23, 483-488, (2004). 20 Bloch, L. et al. Klotho is a substrate for alpha-, beta- and gamma-secretase. FEBS letters 583, 3221-3224, (2009). 21 Kopan, R., Nye, J. S. & Weintraub, H. The intracellular domain of mouse Notch: a constitutively activated repressor of myogenesis directed at the basic helix-loop-helix region of MyoD. Development 120, 2385-2396, (1994). 22 Dahlqvist, C. et al. Functional Notch signaling is required for BMP4-induced inhibition of myogenic differentiation. Development 130, 6089-6099, (2003). 23 Geling, A., Steiner, H., Willem, M., Bally-Cuif, L. & Haass, C. A {gamma}-secretase inhibitor blocks Notch signaling in vivo and causes a severe neurogenic phenotype in zebrafish. EMBO Rep 3, 688-694., (2002). 24 Kitzmann, M. et al. Inhibition of Notch signaling induces myotube hypertrophy by recruiting a subpopulation of reserve cells. Journal of cellular physiology 208, 538-548, (2006). 25 Blader, P. & Strahle, U. Zebrafish developmental genetics and central nervous system development. Human molecular genetics 9, 945-951, (2000). 26 Blader, P., Fischer, N., Gradwohl, G., Guillemot, F. & Strahle, U. The activity of neurogenin1 is controlled by local cues in the zebrafish embryo. Development 124, 4557-4569, (1997). 27 Chung, P. C. et al. Zebrafish Her8a is activated by Su(H)-dependent Notch signaling and is essential for the inhibition of neurogenesis. PloS one 6, e19394, (2011). 28 Pavelka, M. & Ellinger, A. Effect of colchicine on the Golgi complex of rat pancreatic acinar cells. The Journal of cell biology 97, 737-748, (1983). 29 Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Yuan, L. C., Bonifacino, J. S. & Klausner, R. D. Rapid redistribution of Golgi proteins into the ER in cells treated with Brefeldin A: Evidence for membrane cycling from Golgi to ER. Cell 56, 801-813, (1989). 30 Saenz, J. B. et al. Golgicide A reveals essential roles for GBF1 in Golgi assembly and function. Nat Chem Biol 5, 157-165, (2009). 31 Rothman, J. E. Mechanisms of intracellular protein transport. Nature 372, 55-63, (1994). 32 Donaldson, J. G., Cassel, D., Kahn, R. A. & Klausner, R. D. ADP-ribosylation factor, a small GTP-binding protein, is required for binding of the coatomer protein beta-COP to Golgi membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89, 6408-6412, (1992). 33 Helms, J. B. & Rothman, J. E. Inhibition by brefeldin A of a Golgi membrane enzyme that catalyses exchange of guanine nucleotide bound to ARF. Nature 360, 352-354, (1992). 34 Szul, T. et al. Dissection of membrane dynamics of the ARF-guanine nucleotide exchange factor GBF1. Traffic 6, 374-385, (2005). 35 Toomre, D., Keller, P., White, J., Olivo, J. C. & Simons, K. Dual-color visualization of trans-Golgi network to plasma membrane traffic along microtubules in living cells. J Cell Sci, 21-33, (1999). 36 Presley, J. F. et al. ER-to-Golgi transport visualized in living cells. Nature 389, 81-85, (1997). 37 Dukhovny, A., Papadopulos, A. & Hirschberg, K. Quantitative live-cell analysis of microtubule-uncoupled cargo-protein sorting in the ER. Journal of cell science 121, 865-876, (2008). 38 Kim, J. et al. Biogenesis of gamma-secretase early in the secretory pathway. The Journal of cell biology 179, 951-963, (2007). 39 Lee, T. H. & Linstedt, A. D. Potential role for protein kinases in regulation of bidirectional endoplasmic reticulum-to-Golgi transport revealed by protein kinase inhibitor H89. Molecular biology of the cell 11, 2577-2590, (2000). 40 Lathia, J. D., Mattson, M. P. & Cheng, A. Notch: from neural development to neurological disorders. J Neurochem 107, 1471-1481, (2008). 41 Imbimbo, B. P. & Giardina, G. A. gamma-secretase inhibitors and modulators for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: disappointments and hopes. Curr Top Med Chem 11, 1555-1570, (2011). 42 Groth, C. & Fortini, M. E. Therapeutic approaches to modulating Notch signaling: Current challenges and future prospects. Seminars in cell & developmental biology, (2012). 43 Vetrivel, K. S. et al. Spatial segregation of gamma-secretase and substrates in distinct membrane domains. The Journal of biological chemistry 280, 25892-25900, (2005). 44 Goldmann, S. & Stoltefuss, J. 1,4-Dihydropyridines: Effects of Chirality and Conformation on the Calcium Antagonist and Calcium Agonist Activities. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 30, 1559-1578 30, 1559-1578, (1991). 45 Edraki, N., Mehdipour, A. R., Khoshneviszadeh, M. & Miri, R. Dihydropyridines: evaluation of their current and future pharmacological applications. Drug Discov Today 14, 1058-1066, (2009). 46 Dietz, J. D. et al. A number of marketed dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers have mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist activity. Hypertension 51, 742-748, (2008). 47 Fagart, J. et al. A new mode of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism by a potent and selective nonsteroidal molecule. The Journal of biological chemistry 285, 29932-29940, (2010). 48 Meredith, P. A. & Elliott, H. L. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: basic pharmacological similarities but fundamental therapeutic differences. J Hypertens 22, 1641-1648, (2004). 49 Zanetti, G., Pahuja, K. B., Studer, S., Shim, S. & Schekman, R. COPII and the regulation of protein sorting in mammals. Nature cell biology 14, 20-28, (2012). 50 Schroeter, E. H., Kisslinger, J. A. & Kopan, R. Notch-1 signalling requires ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature 393, 382-386, (1998). 51 Ritz, C. & Streibig, J. C. Bioassay Analysis using R. J Statist Software 12, (2005). 52 Sastre, M. et al. Presenilin-dependent gamma-secretase processing of beta-amyloid precursor protein at a site corresponding to the S3 cleavage of Notch. EMBO Rep 2, 835-841, (2001). 53 Steiner, H. et al. Glycine 384 is required for presenilin-1 function and is conserved in polytopic bacterial aspartyl proteases. Nature Cell Biol 2, 848-851, (2000). 54 Steiner, H. et al. PEN-2 is an integral component of the gamma-secretase complex required for coordinated expression of presenilin and nicastrin. J Biol Chem 277, 39062-39065., (2002). 55 Wacker, I. et al. Microtubule-dependent transport of secretory vesicles visualized in real time with a GFP-tagged secretory protein. J Cell Sci 110, 1453-1463., (1997).

SUPPLEMENTAL REFERENCES

(156) 1 Kato, Y. et al. Establishment of the anti-Klotho monoclonal antibodies and detection of Klotho protein in kidneys. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 267, 597-602 (2000). 2 Steiner, H. et al. PEN-2 is an integral component of the gamma-secretase complex required for coordinated expression of presenilin and nicastrin. J Biol Chem 277, 39062-39065. (2002). 3 Snapp, E. L., Sharma, A., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. & Hegde, R. S. Monitoring chaperone engagement of substrates in the endoplasmic reticulum of live cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 6536-6541 (2006). 4 Wang, Y. et al. Activation of ATF6 and an ATF6 DNA binding site by the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. The Journal of biological chemistry 275, 27013-27020 (2000). 6 Malo, N., Hanley, J. A., Cerquozzi, S., Pelletier, J. & Nadon, R. Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis. Nat Biotechnol 24, 167-175 (2006). 7 Zhang, J. H., Chung, T. D. & Oldenburg, K. R. A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. J Biomol Screen 4, 67-73 (1999). 8 Amarego, W. L. F. & Chai, C. L. L. Purification of laboratory chemicals. 6th Edition edn, (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2009). 9 Li, A. H., Moro, S., Melman, N., Ji, X. D. & Jacobson, K. A. Structure-activity relationships and molecular modeling of 3,5-diacyl-2,4-dialkylpyridine derivatives as selective A3 adenosine receptor antagonists. J Med Chem 41, 3186-3201 (1998). 10 Evans, C. G. & Gestwicki, J. E. Enantioselective organocatalytic Hantzsch synthesis of polyhydroquinolines. Org Lett 11, 2957-2959 (2009). 11 Davood, A., Nematollahi, A. R., Iman, M. & Shafiee, A. Synthesis and docking studies of new 1,4-dihydropyridines containing 4-(5)-Chloro-2-ethyl-5-(4)-imidazolyl substituent as novel calcium channel agonist. Arch Pharm Res 32, 481-487 (2009). 12 Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-Ray Diffraction Data Collected in Oscillation Mode. Methods in enzymology 276, 307-326 (1997). 13 Sheldrick, G. M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr A 64, 112-122 (2008). 14 Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. & Schilling, T. F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203, 253-310 (1995). 16 Thisse, C. & Thisse, B. High-resolution in situ hybridization to whole-mount zebrafish embryos. Nature protocols 3, 59-69 (2008). 18 Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25, 402-408 (2001).