FUEL CELL ELECTRODE CATALYST AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME

Abstract

An object of the present invention is to achieve both high initial performance and durability performance of a fuel cell. Such object can be achieved by using a fuel cell electrode catalyst that includes a solid carbon carrier and an alloy of platinum and cobalt supported on the carrier

Claims

1. A fuel cell electrode catalyst comprising: a solid carbon carrier; and an alloy of platinum and cobalt supported on the carrier wherein a molar ratio of platinum to cobalt in the alloy is 4 to 11:1.

2. (canceled)

3. The fuel cell electrode catalyst according to claim 1, wherein an average particle diameter of the alloy is 3.5 to 4.1 nm.

4. The fuel cell electrode catalyst according to claim 1 or 3, wherein a degree of dispersion of the alloy measured through small-angle X-ray scattering is less than or equal to 44%.

5. The fuel cell electrode catalyst according to any one of claims 1, 3, and 4, wherein the catalyst is subjected to acid treatment at 70 to 90° C.

6. The fuel cell electrode catalyst according to any one of claims 1, 3, 4, and 5, wherein an amount of cobalt to be eluted is less than or equal to 115 ppm.

7. A fuel cell comprising the fuel cell electrode catalyst according to any one of claims 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

8. A method for producing a fuel cell electrode catalyst, comprising: a supporting step of causing platinum and cobalt to be supported on a solid carbon carrier; and an alloying step of alloying the platinum and the cobalt supported on the solid carbon carrier, wherein the supporting step includes causing the platinum and the cobalt to be supported at a molar ratio of 2.5 to 6.9:1, and wherein the alloying step includes alloying the platinum and the cobalt at 700 to 900° C.

9. (canceled)

10. (canceled)

11. The production method according to claim 8, further comprising an acid treatment step of subjecting the alloy of the platinum and the cobalt supported on the solid carbon carrier to acid treatment at 70 to 90° C.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0034] FIG. 1 illustrates the relationship between the Pt/Co molar ratio and mass activity.

[0035] FIG. 2 illustrates the relationship between the average particle diameter of a PtCo alloy and mass activity.

[0036] FIG. 3 illustrates the relationship between the average particle diameter of a PtCo alloy and ECSA retention rate.

[0037] FIG. 4 illustrates the relationship between the amount of Co eluted and proton resistance.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

<Fuel Cell Electrode Catalyst>

[0038] An embodiment of the present invention relates to a fuel cell electrode catalyst (hereinafter also simply referred to as an “electrode catalyst”) that comprises a solid carbon carrier and a PtCo alloy supported on the carrier.

[0039] In the present embodiment, a solid carbon carrier is used instead of a hollow carbon carrier, so that a PtCo alloy can be prevented from being contained within the carrier. Accordingly, it becomes possible to sufficiently perform acid treatment on the PtCo alloy and thus suppress elution of Co. Consequently, it becomes possible to achieve both high initial performance and durability performance of the fuel cell.

[0040] The solid carbon is a carbon that has less voids inside the carbon in comparison with hollow carbon. Specifically, the solid carbon is a carbon in which the rate of the outer surface area based on t-Pot (which is the surface area of the outside of the particles calculated from the particle size) relative to the BET surface area determined through N.sub.2 adsorption (t-Pot surface area/BET surface area) is greater than or equal to 40%.

[0041] Examples of solid carbon include carbon described in JP 4362116 B. Specifically, acetylene black whose specific surface area is 500 to 1100 m.sup.2/g and whose crystal layer thickness (Le) measured through X-ray diffraction is 15 to 40 Å is given as an example. More specifically, DENKA BLACK (registered trademark) produced by Denka Company Limited, is given as an example.

[0042] The average particle diameter of the solid carbon carrier is preferably less than or equal to 30 μm, more preferably, less than or equal to 13 μm, or particularly preferably, less than or equal to 10 μm. The lower limit of the average particle diameter is 0.01 μm or 0.1 μm, for example. It is also possible to define a new range by appropriately combining the aforementioned upper limit and lower limit of the average particle diameter.

[0043] In this embodiment, using a PtCo alloy for the electrode catalyst can improve the initial performance of the fuel cell. Herein, setting the molar ratio of Pt to Co in the PtCo alloy to 11 or less: 1 can further increase the mass activity of the electrode catalyst. In addition, setting the molar ratio of Pt to Co in the PtCo alloy to 4 or greater: 1 can further suppress elution of Co. Thus, setting the molar ratio of Pt to Co in the PtCo alloy to 4 to 11:1 can further improve the initial performance and durability performance of the fuel cell. More preferably, the molar ratio of Pt to Co is 5 to 9:1, for example. It is also possible to define a new range by appropriately combining the aforementioned upper limit and lower limit of the molar ratio.

[0044] In addition, setting the average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy to less than or equal to 4.1 nm can further increase the mass activity of the electrode catalyst. Further, setting the average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy to greater than or equal to 3.5 nm can retain a given electrochemically active surface area (ECSA). The ECSA retention rate can be used as an index of the durability performance. Thus, setting the average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy to 3.5 to 4.1 μm can further improve the initial performance and durability performance of the fuel cell. More preferably, the average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy is 3.6 am to 4.0 μm, for example. It is also possible to define a new range by appropriately combining the aforementioned upper limit and lower limit of the average particle diameter.

[0045] The degree of dispersion of the PtCo alloy supported on the solid carbon carrier is, when measured through small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), preferably less than or equal to 44%, more preferably, less than or equal to 40%, or particularly preferably, less than or equal to 36%. The degree of dispersion measured through small-angle X-ray scattering can be used as an index of the uniformity of the PtCo alloy. When the degree of dispersion is less than or equal to 44%, the performance of the fuel cell can be further improved. The lower limit of the degree of dispersion is 5% or 10%, for example, it is also possible to define a new range by appropriately combining the aforementioned upper limit and lower limit of the degree of dispersion.

[0046] The degree of dispersion measured through small-angle X-ray scattering can be calculated using analysis software. Examples of analysis software include nano-solver (produced by Rigaku Corporation).

[0047] The amount of the PtCo alloy supported on the solid carbon carrier is, for example, preferably 47.7 to 53.6% by weight, more preferably, 48.0 to 52.9% by weight, or particularly preferably, 49.1 to 51.5% by weight with respect to the total weight of the solid carbon carrier and PtCo alloy. It is also possible to define a new range by appropriately combining the aforementioned upper limit and lower limit of the range of the supported amount.

[0048] The amount of Pt supported on the solid carbon carrier is, for example, preferably 46.5 to 49.9% by weight, more preferably, 47.1 to 49.1% by weight, or particularly preferably, 47.3 to 48.7% by weight with respect to the total weight of the solid carbon carrier and the PtCo alloy. It is also possible to define a new range by appropriately combining the aforementioned upper limit and lower limit of the supported amount. It is also possible to set the supported amount of Pt to a small amount, such as 10 to 50% by weight, or a large amount, such as 50 to 90% by weight, for example.

[0049] In an embodiment of the present invention, the electrode catalyst is subjected to acid treatment under appropriate conditions (70 to 90° C.). Therefore, elution of Co is suppressed. Specifically, the amount of Co eluted from the electrode catalyst which is subjected to acid treatment is, under specific conditions (conditions where a 20 sulfuric acid solution and 0.5 g electrode catalyst are put in a sample bottle together with a stir bar, and are dispersed while being mixed with a stirrer, and then are mixed at the room temperature for 100 hours), preferably less than or equal to 115 ppm, more preferably, less than or equal to 40 ppm, or particularly preferably, less than or equal to 30 ppm. The lower limit of the amount of Co eluted may be 0 ppm or 5 ppm, for example. It is also possible to define a new range by appropriately combining the aforementioned upper limit and lower limit of the amount of Co eluted.

<Fuel Cell>

[0050] An embodiment of the present invention relates to a fuel cell that comprises fuel cell electrodes (hereinafter simply referred to as “electrodes”) including the aforementioned electrode catalyst and an ionomer, and an electrolyte.

[0051] Examples of ionomers include Nafion (registered trademark) DE2020, DE2021, DE520, DE521, DE1020, and DE1021 produced by DuPont and Aciplex (registered trademark) SS700C/20, SS900/10, and SS1100/5 produced by Asahi Kasei Corporation.

[0052] Examples of fuel cells include a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC), a phosphoric acid fuel cell (PAFC), a molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC), a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), an alkaline fuel cell (AFC), and a direct fuel cell (DFC). Preferably, the fuel cell is a polymer electrolyte fuel cell, though not particularly limited thereto.

[0053] An electrode including the aforementioned electrode catalyst may be used as either a cathode or an anode, or may be used as both.

[0054] The fuel cell may further include separators. Forming a cell stack by stacking single cells each having a membrane electrode assembly (MEA), which includes a pair of electrodes (a cathode and anode) and an electrolyte membrane, and a pair of separators sandwiching the membrane electrode assembly can obtain high power.

<Method for Producing Fuel Cell Electrode Catalyst>

[0055] An embodiment of the present invention relates to a method for producing the aforementioned electrode catalyst, and specifically relates to a method for producing a fuel cell electrode catalyst that comprises a supporting step of causing Pt and Co to be supported on a solid carbon carrier, and an alloying step of alloying Pt and Co supported on the solid carbon carrier.

[0056] In the supporting step, Pt and Co are supported at a molar ratio of preferably 2.5 to 6.9:1, or more preferably, 3.1 to 5.7:1. Part of Co will be removed in the acid treatment step described below. Therefore, in the supporting step, Co is supported in a larger amount than that in a preferable molar ratio of Pt and Co in an electrode catalyst of a final product. Using an electrode catalyst produced with the adoption of such a molar ratio can further improve the initial performance and durability performance of the fuel cell.

[0057] In the alloying step, Pt and Co are alloyed at preferably 700 to 900° C., or more preferably, 750 to 850° C. Using an electrode catalyst produced with the adoption of such an alloying temperature can further improve the initial performance and durability performance of the fuel cell.

[0058] Preferably, the production method in this embodiment further comprises an acid treatment step of subjecting the PtCo alloy supported on the solid carbon carrier to acid treatment.

[0059] In the acid treatment step, the PtCo alloy supported on the solid carbon carrier is subjected to acid treatment at preferably 70 to 90° C., or more preferably, 75 to 85° C. Performing acid treatment at such a temperature can sufficiently remove Co that does not contribute to reactions. Accordingly, elution of Co can be suppressed.

[0060] Examples of acids that are used in the acid treatment step include inorganic acids (nitric acid, phosphoric acid, permanganic acid, sulfuric acid, and hydrochloric acid), organic acids (acetic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, formic acid, citric acid, and lactic acid).

[0061] The materials, products, their characteristics, and the like in the production method in this embodiment, have been already described in the section of <Fuel cell electrode catalyst>. The description in the aforementioned section will be referenced as appropriate.

EXAMPLES

[0062] Although the present invention will be described in further detail below using examples and comparative examples, the technical scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. It should be noted that the examples and comparative examples should not be distinguished based on whether or not they are encompassed in the scope of the appended claims. Embodiments that were able to obtain particularly favorable results are described as examples and the other embodiments are described as comparative examples.

<Production of Electrode Catalyst>

Example 1

[0063] Supporting step: DENKA BLACK (1.0 g: Denka Company Limited,) was dispersed in pure water (41.6 mL). Then, a dinitrodiammine platinum nitric acid solution containing platinum (1.0 g) (JP 4315857 B: produced by CATALER CORPORATION) was dropped to sufficiently soak in the DENKA BLACK. Then, ethanol (3.2 g) was added as a reducing agent to cause reduction and support. The resulting dispersion liquid was cleaned through filtration, and the thus obtained powder was dried to obtain a platinum-supported catalyst. Next, the amount of oxygen on the surface of the platinum-supported catalyst was reduced to less than or equal to 4% by weight, and cobalt (0.03 g) was supported on the catalyst such that the ratio (molar ratio) in the product became Pt Co=7:1.

[0064] DENKA BLACK used in this example is solid carbon in which the crystal layer thickness (Lc) measured through X-ray diffraction is 19 Å, and the rate of the outer surface area based on t-Pot (which is the surface area of the outside of the particles calculated from the particle size) relative to the BET surface area determined through N.sub.2 adsorption (t-Pot surface area/BET surface area) is 49.6%. It should be noted that hollow carbon has a t-Pot surface area/BET surface area of 28.1%.

[0065] Alloying step: the obtained PtCo-supported catalyst was alloyed at 800° C. under an argon atmosphere.

[0066] Acid treatment step: the alloyed PtCo-supported catalyst was subjected to acid treatment at 80° C. using 0.5 N nitric acid, whereby an electrode catalyst was obtained.

Examples 2 to 27, Comparative Examples 1 to 73

[0067] Electrode catalysts were produced through the same steps as those in Example 1 except that the Pt:Co (molar ratio), alloying temperature, and acid treatment temperature were changed.

[0068] The production conditions of Examples and Comparative Examples are shown in Tables 1 to 4.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Pt:Co Alloying Temperature Acid Treatment Temperature (Molar Ratio) (° C.) (° C.) Comparative Example 1 3:1 600 Without Acid Treatment Comparative Example 2 70 Comparative Example 3 80 Comparative Example 4 90 Comparative Example 5 95 Comparative Example 6 700 Without Acid Treatment Comparative Example 7 70 Comparative Example 8 80 Comparative Example 9 90 Comparative Example 10 95 Comparative Example 11 800 Without Acid Treatment Comparative Example 12 70 Comparative Example 13 80 Comparative Example 14 90 Comparative Example 15 95 Comparative Example 16 900 Without Acid Treatment Comparative Example 17 70 Comparative Example 18 80 Comparative Example 19 90 Comparative Example 20 95 Comparative Example 21 1000 Without Acid Treatment Comparative Example 22 70 Comparative Example 23 80 Comparative Example 24 90 Comparative Example 25 95

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Pt:Co Alloying Temperature Acid Treatment Temperature (Molar Ratio) (° C.) (° C.) Comparative Example 26 4:1 600 Without Acid Treatment Comparative Example 27 70 Comparative Example 28 80 Comparative Example 29 90 Comparative Example 30 95 Comparative Example 31 700 Without Acid Treatment <Example 10> 70 <Example 11> 80 <Example 12> 90 Comparative Example 32 95 Comparative Example 33 800 Without Acid Treatment <Example 13> 70 <Example 14> 80 <Example 15> 90 Comparative Example 34 95 Comparative Example 35 900 Without Acid Treatment <Example 16> 70 <Example 17> 80 <Example 18> 90 Comparative Example 36 95 Comparative Example 37 1000 Without Acid Treatment Comparative Example 38 70 Comparative Example 39 80 Comparative Example 40 90 Comparative Example 41 95

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Pt:Co Alloying Temperature Acid Treatment Temperature (Molar Ratio) (° C.) (° C.) Comparative Example 42 7:1 600 Without Treatment Comparative Example 43 70 Comparative Example 44 80 Comparative Example 45 90 Comparative Example 46 95 Comparative Example 47 700 Without Treatment <Example 7> 70 <Example 8> 80 <Example 9> 90 Comparative Example 48 95 Comparative Example 49 800 Without Treatment <Example 2> 70 <Example 1> 80 <Example 3> 90 Comparative Example 50 95 Comparative Example 51 900 Without Acid Treatment <Example 4> 70 <Example 5> 80 <Example 6> 90 Comparative Example 52 95 Comparative Example 53 1000 Without Treatment Comparative Example 54 70 Comparative Example 55 80 Comparative Example 56 90 Comparative Example 57 95

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Pt:Co Alloying Temperature Acid Treatment Temperature (Molar Ratio) (° C.) (° C.) Comparative Example 58 11:1 600 Without Treatment Comparative Example 59 70 Comparative Example 60 80 Comparative Example 61 90 Comparative Example 62 95 Comparative Example 63 700 Without Treatment <Example 19> 70 <Example 20> 80 <Example 21> 90 Comparative Example 64 95 Comparative Example 65 800 Without Treatment <Example 22> 70 <Example 23> 80 <Example 24> 90 Comparative Example 66 95 Comparative Example 67 900 Without Treatment <Example 25> 70 <Example 26> 80 <Example 27> 90 Comparative Example 68 95 Comparative Example 69 1000 Without Treatment Comparative Example 70 70 Comparative Example 71 80 Comparative Example 72 90 Comparative Example 73 95

<MEA Evaluation>

[0069] The electrode catalysts produced in Examples and Comparative Examples were dispersed in an organic solvent, and the resulting dispersion liquids were applied to Teflon (registered trademark) sheet to form electrodes. The electrodes were bonded together with a polymer electrolyte membrane sandwiched therebetween, using hot press, and diffusion layers were disposed on opposite sides thereof, whereby a single cell for a solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell was formed.

[0070] The cell temperature was set to 80° C. and the relative humidity of the opposite electrodes was set to 100%, and then, cyclic voltammetry (CV) and IV measurement were conducted using an evaluation system for single cell performance (produced by TOYO Corporation).

[0071] Regarding CV, potential scan was conducted five times in the range of 0.05 to 1.2 V at a rate of 100 mV/s, and ECSA (electrochemical surface area per unit mass of Pt) was calculated from the amount of electric charge in the H.sub.2 adsorbed region in the 5th CV.

[0072] Regarding the IV measurement, current was controlled as appropriate in the range of 0.01 to 1.0 A/cm.sup.2. The value of current per unit mass of Pt at 0.76 V was defined as the mass activity.

<Average Particle Diameter of PtCo Alloy>

[0073] The average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy was calculated from the intensity of a peak indicated by the Pt metal alone in the XRD chart measured using X-ray diffraction (XRD) that complies with JIS K 0131.

<Amount of Co Eluted>

[0074] A 20 ml, sulfuric acid solution and 0.5 g electrode catalyst were put in a sample bottle together with a stir bar, and were dispersed while being mixed with a stirrer, and then were mixed at the room temperature for 100 hours. After that, the mixed liquid was solid-liquid separated (filtered), and the Co concentration in the filtrate was measured using ICP.

<Proton Resistance>

[0075] After the IV measurement of the single cell, protons were calculated using an alternating-current impedance method.

<Result 1>

[0076] FIG. 1 illustrates the relationship between the Pt/Co molar ratio and mass activity.

[0077] The plots in FIG. 1 correspond to, sequentially from the left, [0078] Comparative Example 13 (Pt/Co molar ratio: 3, mass activity: 253 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V); [0079] Example 14 (Pt/Co molar ratio: 4, mass activity: 200 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V); [0080] Example 1 (Pt/Co molar ratio: 7, mass activity: 185 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V); [0081] Example 23 (Pt/Co molar ratio: 11, mass activity: 175 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V); and [0082] Comparative Example 86 (Pt/Co molar ratio: 15, mass activity: 165 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V).

[0083] The mass activity required for an electrode catalyst mounted on an FC vehicle is greater than or equal to 175 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V. Therefore, the Pt/Co molar ratio is preferably less than or equal to 11. Meanwhile, as is clear from FIG. 4, in Comparative Example 13 in which the Pt/Co molar ratio is 3, the amount of Co eluted is large. Thus, a preferable Pt/Co molar ratio is 4 to 11.

<Result 2>

[0084] FIG. 2 illustrates the relationship between the average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy and mass activity. In addition, FIG. 3 illustrates the relationship between the average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy and ECSA retention rate.

[0085] The plots in FIGS. 2 and 3 correspond to, sequentially from the left, [0086] Comparative Example 44 (average particle diameter: 3 nm, mass activity: 203 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 ECSA retention rate: 37%); [0087] Example 8 (average particle diameter: 3.5 nm, mass activity: 191 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 ECSA retention rate: 40%); [0088] Example 1 (average particle diameter: 4 nm, mass activity: 185 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V, ECSA retention rate: 50%); [0089] Example 5 (average particle diameter: 4.1 nm, mass activity: 178 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V, ECSA retention rate: 52%); [0090] Comparative Example 23 (average particle diameter: 6 nm, mass activity: 135 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V, ECSA retention rate: 71%); and [0091] Comparative Example 55 (average particle diameter: 7 nm, mass activity: 113 mA/cm at 0.76 V, ECSA retention rate: 83%).

[0092] As described above, the mass activity required for an electrode catalyst mounted on an FC vehicle is greater than or equal to 175 mA/cm.sup.2 at 0.76 V. Therefore, the average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy is preferably less than or equal to 4.1 nm. In addition, the ECSA retention rate required for the electrode catalyst is greater than or equal to 40%. Therefore, the average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy is preferably greater than or equal to 3.5 nm. Thus, a preferable average particle diameter of the PtCo alloy is 3.5 to 4.1 nm.

<Result 3>

[0093] FIG. 4 illustrates the relationship between the amount of Co elated and proton resistance.

[0094] The plots in FIG. 4 correspond to, sequentially from the left, [0095] Example 8 (the amount of Co eluted: 4 ppm, proton resistance: 0.50 mΩ.Math.13 cm.sup.2); [0096] Example 1 (the amount of Co eluted: 16 ppm, proton resistance: 0.51 mΩ.Math.13 cm.sup.2); [0097] Example 5 (the amount of Co eluted: 27 ppm, proton resistance: 0.52 mΩ.Math.13 cm.sup.2); [0098] Comparative Example 13 (the amount of Co eluted: 145 ppm, proton resistance: 0.63 mΩ.Math.13 cm.sup.2); and [0099] Comparative Example 26 (the amount of Co elated: 350 ppm, proton resistance: 0.80 mΩ.Math.13 cm.sup.2).

[0100] The proton resistance required for the electrode catalyst is less than or equal to 0.6 mΩ. Thus, a preferable amount of Co eluted is less than or equal to 115 ppm.

[0101] All publications, patents, and patent applications that are cited in this specification are all incorporated by reference into this specification.