Method for culturing pluripotent stem cells

Abstract

Provided is a method by which cells deviated from the undifferentiated state, which emerge in a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, can be removed. In one aspect, provided is a method for culturing stem cells having pluripotency, the method including performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. In another aspect, provided is a method for removing cells deviated from the undifferentiated state, the cells being cells that have emerged or may possibly emerge during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, the method including performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. In still another aspect, provided is a method for maintaining the undifferentiated state of stem cells having pluripotency, the method including performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion.

Claims

1. A method of culturing undifferentiated stem cells having pluripotency, the method comprising: seeding stem cells having pluripotency on a surface to prepare a seeded stem cell culture, adding to the seeded stem cell culture an effective amount of a substance comprising hemagglutinin (HA) of a neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum to prepare an undifferentiated stem cell culture, and subculturing the undifferentiated stem cells from the undifferentiated stem cell culture.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the stem cells having pluripotency are human pluripotent stem cells.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the human pluripotent stem cells are either human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells or human embryonic stem (ES) cells.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the substance further has an ability to bind to a cell surface.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the substance comprises a complex consisting of two or three components selected from the group consisting of three hemagglutinin subcomponents HA1, HA2, and HA3 of the neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the subcomponent HA3 of the complex is of Clostridium botulinum type A or Clostridium botulinum type B.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the seeded stem cell culture is a subculture.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the stem cells are seeded and cultured for at least 3 days prior to the adding of the substance.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the stem cells having pluripotency are iPS cells.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the seeded stem cell culture comprises at least one cell deviated from an undifferentiated state.

11. A method of culturing undifferentiated stem cells having pluripotency, the method comprising: adding to a seeded stem cell culture an effective amount of a substance that inhibits epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) function to prepare an undifferentiated stem cell culture, and subculturing the undifferentiated stem cells having pluripotency from the undifferentiated stem cell culture wherein the substance comprises hemagglutinin (HA) of neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum.

12. A method of culturing undifferentiated human stem cells having pluripotency, the method comprising: seeding human stem cells having pluripotency on a surface to prepare a seeded stem cell culture, adding to the seeded stem cell culture an effective amount of a substance that inhibits cell-cell adhesion to prepare an undifferentiated stem cell culture, and subculturing the undifferentiated human stem cells from the undifferentiated stem cell culture wherein the substance comprises hemagglutinin (HA) of neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum.

13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the human stem cells having pluripotency are human iPS cells.

14. The method according to claim 12, wherein the substance comprises a complex consisting of two or three components selected from the group consisting of three hemagglutinin subcomponents HA1, HA2, and HA3 of the neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum.

15. The method according to claim 14, wherein the subcomponent HA3 of the complex is of Clostridium botulinum type A or Clostridium botulinum type B.

16. The method according to claim 12, wherein the seeded stem cell culture comprises at least one cell deviated from an undifferentiated state.

17. A method of culturing undifferentiated iPS cells having pluripotency, the method comprising: seeding iPS cells having pluripotency on a surface to prepare a seeded iPS cell culture, wherein the seeded iPS cell culture comprises at least one cell deviated from an undifferentiated state, and adding to the seeded iPS cell culture an effective amount of a substance that inhibits epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) function wherein the substance comprises hemagglutinin (HA) of neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 explains how “cells deviated from the undifferentiated state”, which have emerged in a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, are removed by addition of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion, in one embodiment of the present disclosure.

(2) FIG. 2 explains how “cell deviated from the undifferentiated state”, which have emerged in a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, are removed by addition of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion, in one embodiment of the present disclosure.

(3) FIG. 3 explains how “cell deviated from the undifferentiated state”, which emerge in a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, are removed by addition of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion, in one embodiment of the present disclosure.

(4) FIG. 4 explains how “cell deviated from the undifferentiated state”, which emerge in a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, are removed by addition of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion, in one embodiment of the present disclosure.

(5) FIG. 5 explains a schedule of an experiment performed in Example.

(6) FIG. 6 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-1 having a final concentration of 100 nM was added at day 3.

(7) FIG. 7 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-1 having a final concentration of 50 nM was added at day 3.

(8) FIG. 8 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-1 having a final concentration of 10 nM was added at day 3.

(9) FIG. 9 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-1 having a final concentration of 1 nM was added at day 3.

(10) FIG. 10 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-2 having a final concentration of 100 nM was added at day 3.

(11) FIG. 11 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-2 having a final concentration of 50 nM was added at day 3.

(12) FIG. 12 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-2 having a final concentration of 1 nM was added at day 3.

(13) FIG. 13 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-2 having a final concentration of 100 nM was added at day 3.

(14) FIG. 14 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-3 having a final concentration of 50 nM was added at day 3.

(15) FIG. 15 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-3 having a final concentration of 10 nM was added at day 3.

(16) FIG. 16 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where HA-4 having final concentrations of 100 nM, 50 nM, and 10 nM was added at day 3.

(17) FIG. 17 illustrates exemplary micrographs taken when stem cells having pluripotency were cultured using MEF feeder cells.

(18) FIG. 18 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where a Rac-1 inhibitor was added at day 3, and thereafter, HA-1 having a final concentration of 50 nM was added at day 5.

(19) FIG. 19 illustrates exemplary micrographs of stem cells having pluripotency in feeder-free culture.

(20) FIG. 20 illustrates exemplary micrographs in the case where a 201B7 strain or a 454E-2 strain was used.

(21) FIG. 21 explains a schedule of an experiment performed in Example.

(22) FIG. 22 is a graph showing ratios of undifferentiated colonies upon subculture.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(23) The present disclosure, in one aspect, is based on knowledge that in the case where stem cells having pluripotency are cultured in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion, cells deviated from the undifferentiated state, which have emerged and/or emerge in colonies under culture, can be removed. Further, the present disclosure, in one aspect, is based on knowledge that in the case where undifferentiated cells and deviated cells are mixed in cultured cells, a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion can selectively remove the cells deviated from the undifferentiated state

(24) In present disclosure, one or more non-limiting embodiments in which the addition of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion enables removal of “cells deviated from the undifferentiated state” that grew in colonies during culture of stem cells having pluripotency are described based on FIG. 1. A of FIG. 1 illustrates a state in which cells deviated from the undifferentiated state have emerged in a center part of a colony of cells in an undifferentiated state cultured on a plate. In this situation, when a “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” is added to a culture solution, the cells deviated from the undifferentiated state start being removed (B of FIG. 1), and soon deviated cells disappear in the center part of the colony (C of FIG. 1). Thereafter, the culture is continued, whereby cells in the undifferentiated state proliferate, and a colony in the undifferentiated state is formed (D of FIG. 1). As illustrated in this drawing, according to the present disclosure, in one or more non-limiting embodiments, “cells deviated from the undifferentiated state” can be removed as if “being erased with an eraser”.

(25) The mechanism with which cells deviated from the undifferentiated state are removed in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1 can be estimated as described below, though the present disclosure does not have to be interpreted exclusively with this mechanism. First, cells having deviated from the undifferentiated state have weaker cell-cell adhesion and adhesion to substrate, as compared with cells in the undifferentiated state, and it can be considered that gaps tend to be formed between cells (A of FIG. 2). Then, the following can be considered: a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion enters the gaps between cells, which causes the cells deviated from the undifferentiated state to have further weaker cell-cell adhesion, and this causes morphological change to occur, thereby suppressing cell proliferation (B of FIG. 2). Further, the following can be considered: here, cells deviated from the undifferentiated state, which have weaker cell adhesion on substrates, float and are removed by apoptosis (B of FIG. 2). As cells in the undifferentiated state therearound are proliferating, deviated cells are pressed and enclosed in the center part (C of FIG. 2), and eventually are removed by apoptosis (D of FIG. 2).

(26) In the present disclosure one or more non-limiting embodiments in which the addition of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion enables removal of “cells deviated from the undifferentiated state” that emerge in colonies during culture of stem cells having pluripotency are described based on FIG. 3. A of FIG. 3 illustrates a colony of cells in the undifferentiated state cultured on a plate. In this situation, when a “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” is added to a culture medium, even if cells deviated from the undifferentiated state emerge in this colony (B of FIG. 3), the proliferation of deviated cells is suppressed, and eventually such cells are removed (C of FIG. 3). Thereafter, as culture is continued, colonies in the undifferentiated state are continuously formed (D of FIG. 3).

(27) The mechanism with which cells deviated from the undifferentiated state are removed in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3 can be estimated as described below, though the present disclosure does not have to be interpreted exclusively with this mechanism. It can be considered that first, the colony is a colony of cells in the undifferentiated state, and they have strong mutual cell-cell adhesion (A of FIG. 4). Spontaneously cells deviated from the undifferentiated state emerge in this colony (B of FIG. 4). It can be considered that cells deviated from the undifferentiated state have weaker cell-cell adhesion as compared with cells in the undifferentiated state, and gaps tend to be formed between the cells. It can be considered that a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion enters the gaps between cells, which causes the cells deviated from the undifferentiated state to have further weaker cell-cell adhesion, and this causes morphological change to occur, thereby suppressing cell proliferation. Further, the following can be considered: here, cells deviated from the undifferentiated state, which have no cell adhesion with culture surfaces, are pressed out by cells in the undifferentiated state therearound that are continuously proliferating, and are removed by apoptosis (C of FIG. 4).

(28) The present disclosure, therefore, in one aspect, relates to a method for culturing stem cells having pluripotency, the method including performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion (hereinafter also referred to as “the culturing method according to the present disclosure”). By the culturing method according to the present disclosure, in one aspect, an effect is achieved that “cells deviated from the undifferentiated state”, which emerge in a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, can be removed.

(29) The present disclosure, therefore, in another aspect, relates to a method for removing cells deviated from the undifferentiated state, the cells being cells that have emerged or may possibly emerge during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, the method including performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion (hereinafter also referred to as “the removing method according to the present disclosure”). By the culturing method according to the present disclosure, and/or, the removing method according to the present disclosure, in one aspect, cells deviated from the undifferentiated state can be removed from a colony of cells in the undifferentiated state in which deviated cells emerge and that therefore deteriorates, whereby a colony of cells in the undifferentiated state or a colony composed of cells in the undifferentiated state can be obtained.

(30) The present disclosure, therefore, in another aspect, relates to a method for forming a colony composed of cells in the undifferentiated state out of a colony where cells deviated from the undifferentiated state emerge and that therefore deteriorates, the method including culturing the deteriorated colony in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion (hereinafter also referred to as “the colony forming method according to the present disclosure”).

(31) Further, by the culturing method according to the present disclosure and/or the removing method according to the present disclosure, in one aspect, it is possible to culture cells in the undifferentiated state or cells in the undifferentiated state exclusively. The present disclosure, therefore, in another aspect, relates to a method for maintaining the undifferentiated state of stem cells having pluripotency, the method including performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion (hereinafter also referred to as “the maintaining method according to the present disclosure”).

(32) [Stem Cells Having Pluripotency]

(33) In the present disclosure, the stem cell having pluripotency is a human pluripotent stem cell, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. In the present disclosure, the human pluripotent stem cell is a human iPS (induced pluripotent stem) cell or a human ES (embryonic stem) cell, in one or more non-limiting embodiments.

(34) [Cells Deviated from the Undifferentiated State]

(35) In the present disclosure, the cells deviated from the undifferentiated state can be distinguished cells in an undifferentiated state, unlike cells whose cell morphology is in an undifferentiated state, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. In the present disclosure, the “cell deviated from the undifferentiated state” is also referred to as a “deviated cell” or a “cell deviated from the undifferentiated state” in some cases. That a cell has become a deviated cell can be confirmed by disappearance of an undifferentiation marker, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. The undifferentiation marker is Oct3/4, Nanog, SSEA-4, or TRA-1-60 in one or more non-limiting embodiments.

(36) [Substance that can Inhibit Cell-Cell Adhesion]

(37) In the present disclosure, the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a substance that has an activity of inhibiting E-cadherin function, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. In the present disclosure, from the viewpoint of efficiently removing deviated cells, the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion preferably has an ability to bind to cell surfaces, in addition to the activity of inhibiting E-cadherin function, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. The ability to bind to cell surfaces is an ability to bind to cell surfaces of stem cells having pluripotency, in one or more non-limiting embodiments.

(38) (HA)

(39) In the present disclosure, the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is hemagglutinin (HA) of the neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. In the present disclosure, from the viewpoint of efficiently removing deviated cells, the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a complex composed of two or three components selected from the group consisting of three hemagglutinin subcomponents HA1 (HA33), HA2 (HA17), and HA3 (HA70) of the neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum, or a substance containing the complex, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. Further, from the viewpoint of efficiently removing deviated cells, the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a complex composed of HA2 (HA17) and HA3 (HA70), a complex composed of the three components, or a substance containing the complex, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. From the viewpoint of causing the activity of inhibiting E-cadherin function to be expressed, and from the viewpoint of efficiently removing deviated cells, the subcomponent HA3 (HA70) is preferably of Clostridium botulinum type A or Clostridium botulinum type B, in one or more embodiments. Further, the subcomponents HA1 (HA33) and HA2 (HA17) may be of any one of Clostridium botulinum type A, Clostridium botulinum type B, and Clostridium botulinum type C, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. Regarding HA, each subcomponent may be of a recombinant type or a natural type, in one or more non-limiting embodiments.

(40) [Cell Culture in the Presence of Substance that can Inhibit Cell-Cell Adhesion]

(41) In the present disclosure, “cell culture in the presence of the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” can use culture conditions, a culture medium, and the like that are conventionally used and/or will be developed in future for stem cells having pluripotency, and this can be achieved by making the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion be present in the medium under the culture conditions. In one or more non-limiting embodiments, the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion may be added to a culture medium under culture, or alternatively, a medium to which the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is preliminarily added may be used for culture. As the culture medium, the culture plate, and the like, those which are commercially available may be used.

(42) The “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” may be added to a medium after deviated cells are confirmed, or alternatively, may be added to a medium at a stage where deviated cells have not emerged yet.

(43) The concentration of the “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” present in a medium is a substantially effective concentration that enables removal of deviated cells, in one or more non-limiting embodiments, and any person skilled in the art is able to set the concentration. From the viewpoint of efficiently removing deviated cells, the concentration of the “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” present in the medium is 5 nM or more, 10 nM or more, or alternatively, 15 nM or more, for example, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. From the same viewpoint, the concentration is 200 nM or less, 150 nM or less, or alternatively, 100 nM or less.

(44) In one or more non-limiting embodiments in which the “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” is present in the medium, the administration of the same may be a single administration per one period, which is until next medium exchange, or serial administration, or alternatively, occasional administration.

(45) In the present disclosure, cell culture includes subculture, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. By the culturing method according to the present disclosure, and/or according to the removing method according to the present disclosure, in one aspect, an effect can be achieved that the ratio of an undifferentiated colony (a colony that is formed with undifferentiated cells and that substantially does not contain deviated cells) in a colony formed after subculture can be improved. The subculture can be performed by any of techniques that are conventionally known and are to be developed in future, in one or more non-limiting embodiments.

(46) In the present disclosure, the cell culture may be culture using feeder cells, or may be feeder-free culture, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. Examples of the feeder cells include MEF (Mouse Embryo Fibroblast) cells, SL10, and SNL 76/7 feeder cells, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. Among the feeder cells, feeder cells that allow the migration speed of stem cells having pluripotency to be relatively slow are preferred, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. In one or more non-limiting embodiments, the feeder cells are preferably SNL 76/7 feeder cells, from the viewpoint that the migration of stem cells having pluripotency is relatively slow and a colony of deviated cells is allowed to emerge in the center part of a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency.

(47) The cell culture is preferably performed under conditions in which deviated cells may possibly emerge in a center part of a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, from the viewpoint that the deviated cells can be removed efficiently, in one or more non-limiting embodiments. In one or more non-limiting embodiments, the migration of stem cells having pluripotency is inhibited and/or suppressed, whereby deviated cells can efficiently emerge in the center part of the colony.

(48) In another aspect, the present disclosure relates to a method for culturing stem cells having pluripotency, the method including culturing cells in the presence of a substance that can inhibit migration, and performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. By the culturing method according to the present aspect, in one aspect, deviated cells are allowed to emerge in the center part of a colony during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, and this makes it possible to achieve an effect of efficiently removing deviated cells.

(49) The present disclosure, in another aspect, relates to a method for removing deviated cells that have emerged or may possibly emerge during culture of stem cells having pluripotency, the method including culturing cells in the presence of a substance that can inhibit migration, and performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. By the culturing method according to the present aspect, and/or by the removing method according to the present aspect, in one aspect, deviated cells can be removed from a colony of cells in the undifferentiated state in which deviated cells emerge and that therefore deteriorates, whereby a colony of cells in the undifferentiated state or a colony composed of cells in the undifferentiated state can be obtained.

(50) The present disclosure, in another aspect, relates to a method for forming a colony composed of cells in the undifferentiated state out of a colony where deviated cells emerge and that therefore deteriorates, the method including; culturing cells in the presence of a substance that can inhibit migration; and culturing the deteriorated colony in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion.

(51) In the present disclosure, in one or more non-limiting embodiments, examples of the substance that can inhibit migration include a substance that suppresses/inhibits activity of a substance relating to migration of stem cells having pluripotency. In the present disclosure, in one or more non-limiting embodiments, examples of the substance that can inhibit migration include a migration inhibitor. In one or more non-limiting embodiments, examples of the substance that can inhibit migration include a Rac-1 inhibitor. In one or more non-limiting embodiments, from the viewpoint of efficiently moving deviated cells to the center part of a colony and efficiently removing the deviated cells, the concentration of the “substance that can inhibit migration” that is caused to be present in the medium is 50 μM or more, 100 μM or more, or alternatively, 150 μM or more. From the same viewpoint, the concentration is 200 μM or less.

(52) In one or more non-limiting embodiments, the substance that can inhibit migration may be added to the medium upon culture start, or may be added when the medium is exchanged. In one or more non-limiting embodiments, the substance that can inhibit migration may be added to the medium at a stage where no deviated cell emerges, or alternatively, may be added to the medium after a deviated cell is confirmed.

(53) By the culturing method according to the present disclosure, and/or by the removing method according to the present disclosure, cell culture is performed in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion, whereby, in one aspect, deviated cells can be removed automatically from a colony, with a closed space being maintained. Further, in one aspect, even in the case where an artificial operation and/or confirmation, or a special device such as a robot, is not used, deviated cells can be removed from a colony automatically. Further, by the culturing method according to the present disclosure, and/or by the removing method according to the present disclosure, in one aspect, automatically a colony of cells in the undifferentiated state or a colony composed of cells in the undifferentiated state can be obtained.

(54) By using the culturing method according to the present disclosure, and/or the removing method according to the present disclosure, therefore, a colony of cells in the undifferentiated state or a colony composed of cells in the undifferentiated state can be efficiently obtained by an automatic culture device, and further, cells in the undifferentiated state can be mass-produced efficiently in a simple manner.

(55) The present disclosure, in another aspect, relates to a composition that contains a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion (hereinafter also referred to as “the composition according to the present disclosure”). The “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” in the composition according to the present disclosure is as mentioned above. The composition according to the present disclosure can be used for the culturing method according to the present disclosure, the removing method according to the present disclosure, the colony forming method according to the present disclosure, and/or the maintaining method according to the present disclosure. The present disclosure, therefore, in another aspect, relates to the use of the “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” in the culturing method according to the present disclosure, the removing method according to the present disclosure, the colony forming method according to the present disclosure, and/or the maintaining method according to the present disclosure.

(56) The present disclosure, in another aspect, relates to a kit including: a medium component for a stem cell having pluripotency; and a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion (hereinafter also referred to as “the kit according to the present disclosure”). The “substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion” in the kit according to the present disclosure is as mentioned above. The kit according to the present disclosure can be used for the culturing method according to the present disclosure, the removing method according to the present disclosure, the colony forming method according to the present disclosure, and/or the maintaining method according to the present disclosure. The medium component for stem cells having pluripotency is not limited particularly, and a medium component that has been conventionally used or that is to be developed in future can be used.

(57) The present disclosure further relates to one or more non-limiting embodiments described below. (1) A method for culturing a stem cell having pluripotency, the method including performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. (2) A method for removing a cell that has deviated from an undifferentiated state, the cell being a cell that has emerged or may possibly emerge during culture of a stem cell having pluripotency, the method including: performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. (3) A method for maintaining an undifferentiated state of a stem cell having pluripotency, the method including: performing cell culture in the presence of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. (4) The method according to any one of (1) to (3), wherein the stem cell having pluripotency is a human pluripotent stem cell. (5) The method according to (4), wherein the human pluripotent stem cell is either a human iPS cell or a human ES cell. (6) The method according to any one of (1) to (5), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a substance having an activity of inhibiting E-cadherin function. (7) The method according to (6), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion further has an ability to bind to a cell surface. (8) The method according to any one of (1) to (7), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is hemagglutinin (HA) of a neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum. (9) The method according to any one of (1) to (8), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a complex composed of two or three components selected from the group consisting of three hemagglutinin subcomponents HAL HA2, and HA3 of the neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum. (10) The method according to (9), wherein the subcomponent HA3 of the complex is of Clostridium botulinum type A or Clostridium botulinum type B. (11) The method according to any one of (1) to (10), wherein the culture is subculture. (12) A composition for culture of a stem cell having pluripotency, the composition containing a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. (13) A composition for removing a cell deviated from the undifferentiated state, the cell being a cell that has emerged or may possibly emerge during culture of a stem cell having pluripotency, the composition containing a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. (14) A composition for maintaining an undifferentiated state of a stem cell having pluripotency, the composition containing a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. (15) The composition according to any one of (12) to (14), wherein the stem cell having pluripotency is a human pluripotent stem cell. (16) The composition according to (15), wherein the human pluripotent stem cell is either a human iPS cell or a human ES cell. (17) The composition according to any one of (12) to (16), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a substance having an activity of inhibiting E-cadherin function. (18) The composition according to (17), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion further has an ability to bind to a cell surface. (19) The composition according to any one of (12) to (18), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is hemagglutinin of a neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum. (20) The composition according to any one of (12) to (19), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a complex composed of two or three components selected from the group consisting of three hemagglutinin subcomponents HA1, HA2, and HA3 of the neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum. (21) The composition according to (20), wherein the subcomponent HA3 of the complex is of Clostridium botulinum type A or Clostridium botulinum type B. (22) The composition according to any one of (12) to (21), wherein the culture is subculture. (23) The composition according to any one of (12) to (22), for the method according to any one of (1) to (11). (24) A kit including: a medium component for a stem cell having pluripotency; and a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. (25) The kit according to (24) for removing a cell that has deviated from an undifferentiated state, the cell being a cell that has emerged or may possibly emerge during culture of a stem cell having pluripotency. (26) The kit according to (24) for culturing a stem cell having pluripotency. (27) The kit according to (24) for removing a cell that has deviated from an undifferentiated state, the cell being a cell that has emerged or may possibly emerge during culture of a stem cell having pluripotency, the composition containing a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion. (28) The kit according to any one of (24) to (27), wherein the stem cell having pluripotency is a human pluripotent stem cell. (29) The kit according to (28), wherein the human pluripotent stem cell is either a human iPS cell or a human ES cell. (30) The kit according to any one of (24) to (29), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a substance having an activity of inhibiting E-cadherin function. (31) The kit according to (30), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion further has an ability to bind to a cell surface. (32) The kit according to any one of (24) to (31), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is hemagglutinin of a neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum. (33) The kit according to any one of (24) to (32), wherein the substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion is a complex composed of two or three components selected from the group consisting of three hemagglutinin subcomponents HA1, HA2, and HA3 of the neurotoxin complex of Clostridium botulinum. (34) The kit according to (33), wherein the subcomponent HA3 of the complex is of Clostridium botulinum type A or Clostridium botulinum type B. (35) The kit according to any one of (24) to (34), wherein the culture is subculture. (36) The kit according to any one of (24) to (35), for the method according to any one of (1) to (11). (37) Use of a substance that can inhibit cell-cell adhesion, in the method according to any one of (1) to (11).

EXAMPLES

(58) Hereinafter, the present disclosure is described in further details by way of examples, though these are examples and the present disclosure is not limited by these examples at all.

(59) [Influences of Hemagglutinin (HA) on iPS Cells (Part 1)]

(60) According to the experiment schedule illustrated in FIG. 5, iPS cells were cultured. First, iPS cells were seeded on feeder cells (day 0), and the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium every 24 hours. At three days after the start (day 3), HA was added, and incubation was carried out for 24 hours. After washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) twice, the culture medium was exchanged with maintenance medium (day 4). Thereafter, until nine days after the start (day 9), the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium every 24 hours. After the culture, the expression of Oct3/4 of the cultured cells was confirmed by immunocytostaining, and further, DAPI staining was performed. The used cells, media, and HA, as well as the culture conditions are as follows.

(61) (Cell)

(62) iPS cells: Tic (Np 39)

(63) Feeder cells: SNL 76/7 (Np 5) treated with mitomycin C

(64) (Medium)

(65) iPS cells: Repro Stem (trade name, manufactured by ReproCELL J, Inc.), 5 ng/mL FGF-2

(66) Feeder cells: DMEM (7% FBS, 1% Penicillin-streptomycin solution)

(67) (Container)

(68) 24-well plate (bottom area: 1.9 cm.sup.2/well, medium amount: 0.4 mL/well)

(69) (HA)

(70) As HA complex samples, hemagglutinins HA-1 to HA-4 shown in Table 1 below were used, which are Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin complex samples It should be noted that HA-1 and HA-2 are complexes in each of which all of the subcomponents HA1 to HA3 are of the type B, and are HA complex samples that were prepared individually. HA-3 is a HA complex specimen in which HA1 is of the type C and HA2 and HA3 are of the type B. HA-4 is a HA complex specimen in which HA1 and HA2 are of the type B and HA3 is of the type C.

(71) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 E- cadherin HA1 HA2 HA3 inhibiting HA (HA33) (HA17) (HA70) ability 1 Type B Type B Type B + 2 Type B Type B Type B + 3 Type C Type B Type B + 4 Type B Type B Type C −
(HA Preparing and Adding Method)

(72) Dilution of HA: In order to make PBS included in the same dilution series have the same concentrations, two-stage dilution was performed. First, HA was serially diluted with PBS, and it was further diluted using a medium (Repro Stem). (The final concentrations: 100, 50, 10, 1 nM)

(73) Further, bFGF (final concentration: 5 ng/ml) was added, and the HA thus diluted was added to the iPS cells.

(74) (Culture Conditions)

(75) 5% CO.sub.2 atmosphere at 37° C.

(76) After the subculture of iPS cells, in the exchange of the culture medium at t=72 h (day 3), HA-1 to HA-4 were added at respective concentrations, which was followed by the culture for 24 hours. Thereafter, in the exchange of the culture medium at t=96 h (day 4), the medium was switched to a HA-free medium, and the culture was continued.

(77) (Observation)

(78) At day 3, day 4, day 5, and day 9, the cultured cells were observed with IN Cell Analyzer 2000 (trade name, manufactured by GE healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.), and images thereof were acquired. Micrographs obtained in the case where HA-1 was added at 100 nM, 50 nM, 10 nM, and 1 nM are illustrated in FIGS. 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively.

(79) As illustrated in FIG. 6, in the case where HA-1 was added at 100 nM, deviated cells that had emerged as of day 3 were not observed after day 4. At day 4, gaps were formed between cells, and each cell had a slightly elongated shape. After day 5, gaps were filled, each cell had a smaller size, and the cells were densely laid in a form cobblestone-like shape, whereby colonies expanded. At day 9, the areas that included deviated cells that had emerged after day 5 were observed.

(80) As illustrated in FIG. 7, regarding day 3 to 5, the result of the case where HA-1 was added at 50 nM was identical to the result of the case where HA-1 was added at 100 nM. At day 9, however, no deviated cells were observed.

(81) As illustrated in FIG. 8, in the case where HA-1 was added at 10 nM, deviated cells that had emerged as of day 3 appeared to have decreased at day 4. At day 5, however, the areas that included deviated cells were expanded again. Thereafter, the areas that included deviated cells expanded.

(82) As illustrated in FIG. 9, in the case where HA-1 was added at 1 nM, the areas that included deviated cells that had emerged as of day 3 continuously expanded after day 3. Cell morphology change and decrease of deviated cells were not observed.

(83) Micrographs obtained in the case where HA-2 was added at 100 nM, 50 nM, and 1 nM are illustrated in FIGS. 10, 11, and 12, respectively. As illustrated in FIG. 10, the result of the case where HA-2 was added at 100 nM was identical to the result of the case where HA-1 was added at 100 nM (FIG. 6). As illustrated in FIG. 11, the result of the case where HA-2 was added at 50 nM was identical to the result of the case where HA-1 was added at 50 nM (FIG. 7). As illustrated in FIG. 12, the result of the case where HA-2 was added at 1 nM was identical to the result of the case where HA-1 was added at 1 nM (FIG. 9).

(84) The results regarding HA-1 and HA-2 are compiled in Table 2 illustrated below. As indicated in Table 2, in the case where HA-1 and HA-2 were added at 100 nM and 50 nM, deviated cells that had emerged as of day 3 shrank and/or disappeared.

(85) FIG. 13 illustrates results of observation of influences of HA-2 on deviated cells that were brought in during the subculture. As illustrated in this drawing, when HA-2 was added at 100 nM and the cells were treated for 24 hours, deviated cells gradually peeled off.

(86) Micrographs obtained in the case where HA-3 was added at 50 nM and 10 nM are illustrated in FIGS. 14 and 15, respectively.

(87) As illustrated in FIG. 14, in the case where HA-3 was added at 50 nM, the areas of deviated cells that had emerged as of day 3 stopped expanding, and after day 4, the areas of deviated cells shrank as deviated cells were proliferated. At day 9, deviated cells remained in a part of the center of the colony. At day 4, gaps were formed between iPS cells, and each iPS cell had a slightly elongated shape. After day 5, as iPS cells were proliferated, colonies formed with iPS cells with cobblestone-like shape densely laid were obtained. On the other hand, feeder cells detach. It should be noted that in the case where HA-3 was added at 100 nM, the same result as that obtained in the case where HA-3 was added at 50 nM was obtained.

(88) As illustrated in FIG. 15, in the case where HA-3 was added at 10 nM, the areas of deviated cells continuously expanded after day 3. Cell morphology form change, decrease of deviated cells, and the detachment of feeder cells were not observed.

(89) Micrographs obtained in the case where HA-4 was added at 100 nM, 50 nM, and 10 nM are illustrated in FIG. 16. As illustrated in the drawing, the areas of deviated cells that had emerged as of day 3 continuously expanded. In the case where HA-4 was added at 100 nM, the shrinking of the areas of deviated cells might possibly occur.

(90) The results of the cases of HA-3 and HA-4 are compiled in Table 2 illustrated below.

(91) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Final Deviated cell area as Form of colony and HA concentration of day 3 iPS cell Others 1.2 100 nM  Disappear At day 4, slightly Deviated cells elongated cells with brought in upon gaps there between subculture disappear 50 nM After day 5, cells become dense, thereby forming the shape of normal colonies 10 nM Shrink, and No remarkable thereafter expand difference again  1 nM Expand 3 100 nM  Shrink At day 4, slightly Feeder cells detach elongated cells with gaps there between 50 nM After day 5, cells become dense, thereby forming shape of normal colonies 10 nM Expand No remarkable Feeder cells do not difference detach 4 100 nM  Expand No remarkable 50 nM difference 10 nM

(92) As illustrated in Table 2, in the cases of HA-1 and HA-2, areas of deviated cells efficiently shrank and/or disappeared, as compared with the cases of HA-3 and HA-4. Further, in the case of HA-3, areas of deviated cells efficiently shrank, and/or the expansion of the areas was efficiently suppressed, as compared with the case of HA-4.

(93) [Influences of Feeder Cells on iPS Cells]

(94) On feeder cells, iPS cells were seeded, and the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium every 24 hours until day 7. After the culture, the expression of Oct3/4 of the cultured cells was confirmed by immunocytostaining, and DAPI staining was performed. The used cells and media, as well as the culture conditions are as follows.

(95) (Cell)

(96) iPS cells: Tic (Np 39)

(97) Feeder cells: MEF

(98) (Medium)

(99) iPS cells: Repro Stem (trade name, manufactured by ReproCELL J, Inc.), 5 ng/mL FGF-2

(100) Feeder cells: DMEM (7% FBS, 1% Penicillin-streptomycin solution)

(101) (Container)

(102) 24-well plate (bottom area: 1.9 cm.sup.2/well, medium amount: 0.4 mL/well)

(103) (Culture Conditions)

(104) 5% CO.sub.2 atmosphere at 37° C.

(105) (Observation)

(106) At day 3 and day 7, the cultured cells were observed with IN Cell Analyzer 2000 (trade name, manufactured by GE healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.), and images thereof were acquired. Micrographs obtained are illustrated in FIG. 17.

(107) As illustrated in FIG. 17, deviated cells grew in an outer edge part (outside) of a colony.

(108) Next, cells were cultured and observed in the same manners as those described above except that a Rac-1 inhibitor (trade name: NSC23766, Calbiochem brand), which is a migration inhibitor, was added at 50, 100, or 150 μM at three days after the start of the culture (day 3). The obtained micrographs are illustrated in FIG. 17.

(109) (Rac-1 Inhibitor Preparing and Adding Method)

(110) Dilution of Rac-1 inhibitor: the Rac-1 inhibitor was diluted by using a medium (Repro Stem) (final concentration: 50 or 100 μM).

(111) Further, bFGF (trade name, manufactured by ReproCELL, Inc., final concentration 5 ng/ml) was added thereto, and the Rac-1 inhibitor thus diluted was added to iPS cells.

(112) As illustrated in FIG. 17, the addition of the Rac-1 inhibitor caused deviated cells, which had emerged in the outer edge part of the colony in the case where the Rac-1 inhibitor was not added, to emerge in the center part of the colony. The inhibition of cell migration allowed the deviated cells to emerge in the center part of the colony. This indicates that the inhibition of cell migration allows deviated cells to emerge in the center part of a colony, and this makes it possible to remove the deviated cells.

(113) Culture was performed by using SNL feeder cells as the feeder cells and adding the Rac-1 inhibitor (50 or 100 μM) at three days after the culture start (day 3). Deviated cells grew in the center part of a colony (date not shown), as is the case with the Rac-1 inhibitor was not added.

(114) [Influences of Hemagglutinin (HA) on iPS Cells (Part 2)]

(115) Influences of HA on the deviated cells induced by the Rac-1 inhibitor were confirmed. First of all, iPS cells were seeded on feeder cells (day 0), and the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium every 24 hours. At three days after the start (day 3), the 100 μM Rac-1 inhibitor was added and incubation was carried out for 24 hours. After washed with PBS twice, the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium (day 4). At five days after the start (day 5), HA-1 was added and incubation was carried out for 24 hours. After washed with PBS twice, the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium (day 6). Thereafter, until 8 days later (day 8), the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium every 24 hours. After the culture, the expression of Oct3/4 of the cultured cells was confirmed by immunocytostaining, and further, DAPI staining was performed. The used cells and media, as well as the culture conditions are as follows. The methods for preparing and adding the Rac-1 inhibitor and HA are as mentioned above.

(116) (Cell)

(117) iPS cells: Tic (Np 39)

(118) Feeder cells: MEF

(119) (Medium)

(120) iPS cells: Repro Stem (trade name, manufactured by ReproCELL Inc.), 5 ng/mL bFGF (trade name, manufactured by ReproCELL Inc.)

(121) Feeder cells: DMEM (10% IBS (Gibco brand), 1% HEPES (manufactured by SIGMA Corporation), 1% Penicillin-streptomycin (manufactured by NACALAI TESQUE))

(122) (Container)

(123) 24-well plate (bottom area: 1.9 cm.sup.2/well, medium amount: 0.4 mL/well) (Observation)

(124) At day 3, day 4, day 5, day 6, and day 8, the cultured cells were observed with IN Cell Analyzer 2000 (trade name, manufactured by GE healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.), and images thereof were acquired. Micrographs obtained are illustrated in FIG. 18.

(125) Further, as control, cells were cultured and observed in the same manners as those described above except that HA-1 was not added. Micrographs obtained are illustrated in FIG. 18.

(126) As illustrated in FIG. 18, it is confirmed that the areas that included deviated cells that had emerged in the center part of the colony by addition of the Rac-1 inhibitor thereto shrank and/or disappeared due to addition of HA thereto.

(127) [Influences of Feeder-Free Culture on iPS Cells]

(128) Synthemax Surface (trade name, manufactured by Corning Inc.) was used as a culture surface, and iPS cells were seeded thereover. The culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium every 24 hours until day 7. After the culture, the expression of Oct3/4 of the cultured cells was confirmed by immunocytostaining, and DAPI staining was performed. The used cells and media, as well as the culture conditions are as follows.

(129) (Cell)

(130) iPS cells: Tic (Np 39)

(131) (Medium)

(132) mTeSR (Trade Mark) 1 medium (trade name, manufactured by STEMCELL, Technologies)

(133) (Container)

(134) 24-well plate (bottom area: 1.9 cm.sup.2/well, medium amount: 0.4 mL/well)

(135) (Culture Conditions)

(136) 5% CO.sub.2 atmosphere at 37° C.

(137) (Observation)

(138) At day 6, the cultured cells were observed with IN Cell Analyzer 2000 (trade name, manufactured by GE healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.), and images thereof were acquired.

(139) In the case of feeder-free culture, as is the case with the MEF feeder cells, deviated cells grew in the outer edge part (outside) of the colony.

(140) Next, cells were cultured and observed in the same manner as those described above except that the Rac-1 inhibitor was added at 100 or 150 μM at three days after the start of the culture (day 3). Micrographs obtained are illustrated in FIG. 19. FIG. 19 illustrates micrographs obtained in the case where the Rac-1 inhibitor was 150 μM. As illustrated in FIG. 19, the addition of the Rac-1 inhibitor allowed deviated cells to emerge in the center part of a colony. This indicates that in the case of the feeder-free culture as well, the inhibition of cell migration allows deviated cells to emerge in the center part of a colony, and this makes it possible to remove the deviated cells.

(141) [Influences of Hemagglutinin (HA) on iPS Cells (Part 3)]

(142) Cells were cultured and observed under the same conditions as those in the case of influences of hemagglutinin (HA) on iPS cells (part 1) except that cells 1 or 2 shown below were used as the cells, HA-1 was used as the HA, and the added concentration of HA was set to 50 nM. Micrographs obtained are illustrated in FIG. 20.

(143) (Cell 1)

(144) (Cell)

(145) iPS cells: 201B7 strain

(146) Feeder cells: SNL76/7 cells

(147) (Medium)

(148) iPS cells: Repro Stem (trade name, manufactured by ReproCELL Inc.)

(149) Feeder cells: DMEM (7% FBS, 1% Penicillin-streptomycin solution)

(150) (Cell 2)

(151) (Cell)

(152) iPS cells: 454E-2 strain

(153) Feeder cells: SNL76/7 cells

(154) (Medium)

(155) iPS cells: Repro Stem (trade name, manufactured by ReproCELL Inc.)

(156) Feeder cells: DMEM (7% FBS, 1% Penicillin-streptomycin solution)

(157) As illustrated in FIG. 20, regarding a colony containing deviated cells, when HA was added, an area of deviated cells shrank and/or disappeared.

(158) [Influences of Hemagglutinin (HA) on Subculture]

(159) According to the experiment schedule illustrated in FIG. 21, iPS cells were subcultured. First, iPS cells were seeded on feeder cells (day 0), and the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium every 24 hours. At three days after the start (day 3), HA was added at 50 nM, and incubation was carried out for 24 hours. After washed with PBS twice, the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium (day 4). Thereafter, until ten days after the start (day 10), the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium every 24 hours. After the culture, subculture was carried out by normal operations, and at three days after the subculture (day 13), HA was added at 50 nM, and incubation was carried out for 24 hours. After washed with PBS twice, the culture medium was exchanged with a maintenance medium (day 14). Thereafter, ten-day culture, subculture, addition of HA and culture (10 days) were carried out. The expression of Oct3/4 of the cultured cells was confirmed by immunocytostaining, and further, DAPI staining was performed. The used cells and media, as well as culture conditions are as follows. As HA, HA-1 was used.

(160) (Cell)

(161) iPS cells: Tic (Np 39)

(162) Feeder cells: SNL 76/7 (Np 5) treated with mitomycin C

(163) (Medium)

(164) iPS cells: Repro Stem (trade name, manufactured by ReproCELL Inc.), 5 ng/mL FGF-2

(165) Feeder cells: DMEM (7% FBS, 1% Penicillin-streptomycin solution)

(166) (Container)

(167) 24-well plate (bottom area: 1.9 cm.sup.2/well, medium amount: 0.4 mL/well)

(168) (HA Preparing and Adding Method)

(169) Dilution of HA: In order to make PBS included in the same dilution series have the same concentrations, two-stage dilution was performed. First, HA was serially diluted with PBS, and it was further diluted using a medium (Repro Stem). (The final concentration: 50 nM) Further, bFGF (final concentration: 5 ng/ml) was added, and the HA thus diluted was added to the iPS cells.

(170) (Culture Conditions)

(171) 5% CO.sub.2 atmosphere at 37° C.

(172) After the subculture of iPS cells, in the exchange of the culture medium at t=72 h (day 3), HAs were added at respective concentrations, which was followed by the culture for 24 hours. Thereafter, in the exchange of the culture medium at t=96 h (day 4), the medium was switched to a HA-free medium, and the culture was continued.

(173) (Observation)

(174) At day 3, day 4, day 10, day 13, day 14, day 20, day 23, day 24 and day 30, the cultured cells were observed with IN Cell Analyzer 2000 (trade name, manufactured by GE healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp.), and images were acquired. Further, the numbers of formed colonies and undifferentiated colonies (colonies formed with undifferentiated cells, containing no deviated cells) were measured, and the ratio of undifferentiated colonies was calculated. The results are shown in FIG. 22.

(175) As a comparative example, subculture was performed in the same conditions except that HA was not added. The results are shown in FIG. 22.

(176) In FIG. 22, white circles indicate a line of cultures in which HA was added, and black circles indicate a line of cultures in which HA was not added. As shown in FIG. 22, in the case where HA was added, as compared with the case where HA was not added, the ratio of undifferentiated colonies formed after subculture increased. In other words, by removing deviated cells, undifferentiated colonies were formed efficiently.