METHOD FOR OPERATING AND CONTROLLING A LASER DEVICE FOR ENGRAVING, MARKING, LETTERING AND/OR CUTTING A PREFERABLY FLAT WORKPIECE

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a method for creating a job from a central operator software for various laser types, in particular a laser plotter or a galvo marking laser, for engraving, marking, lettering and/or cutting a preferably flat workpiece, in which at least one beam source in the form of a laser is used in a housing of the laser device for processing the workpiece. The workpiece is deposited in a defined manner in a processing chamber on a processing table and a laser beam emitted by the beam source is sent via deflecting elements to at least one focusing unit, by which the laser beam is deflected in the direction of the workpiece and positioned accordingly. The control is effected via control software running in a control unit, in which software a so-called job is processed.

Claims

1-16. (canceled)

17. A method for creating a job from a central operator software for various laser types, in particular a laser plotter or a galvo marking laser, for engraving, marking, lettering and/or cutting of a flat workpiece, in which at least one beam source in the form of a laser is used in a housing of the laser device for processing the workpiece, wherein the workpiece is deposited in a defined manner in a processing chamber on a processing table, and a laser beam emitted by the beam source sent via deflecting elements to at least one focusing unit from which the laser beam is deflected in the direction of the workpiece and positioned accordingly, wherein control is effected by control software running in a control unit having a computer processor, in which the control software a so-called job is processed; wherein a graphic and/or text is created or imported in central operator software, whereupon in the central operator software, for the purpose of creating the job the parameters “material, material thickness, engraving depth or effect, and cutting effect” are set, whereupon a laser type—the laser plotter or the galvo marking laser—is suggested or determined, by the central operator software, or the user selects the desired laser type—the laser plotter or galvo marking laser—, whereupon, after selection of the laser type, the movement parameters of the selected laser type required for the generation of the graphics and/or text are determined or calculated and fixed by an analysis tool, whereupon the laser power and speed are calculated and fixed by the analysis tool.

18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the individual beam diameters of the laser types are taken into account in the analysis tool for determining the movement parameters.

19. The method according to claim 17, wherein the movement parameters for x-y movement paths of a carriage are determined and generated by the analysis tool when the laser type “laser plotter” is selected.

20. The method according to claim 17, wherein the movement parameters for angular adjustment of a mirror are determined and generated by the analysis tool when the laser type “galvo marking laser” is selected.

21. The method according to claim 17, wherein, depending on the laser type, a stored beam diameter, in particular laser spot diameter, is used for calculation of the movement parameters, or the lenses of the selected laser type are interrogated and the beam diameter is calculated or determined from a database according to the lens used.

22. The method according to claim 17, wherein at parameter “Effects” one or more setting options, such as cut-through, engraving quality, in particular engraving at low quality or fine-detail engraving or high-contrast engraving or photo engraving, deep engraving, fast cutting, precise cutting, etc., are selected.

23. The method according to claim 17, wherein, when the parameter “Laser type” is activated, a window is opened in which all available laser units can be seen.

24. The method according to claim 23, wherein all the available laser units can be selected in the opened window.

25. The method according to claim 23, wherein additional information of the displayed laser units, such as status, processing time, utilization, etc., is displayed.

26. The method according to claim 17, wherein instead of the parameter “laser type”, all the available laser units can be displayed and selected.

27. The method according to claim 17, wherein the central operator software is invoked via a higher-level network, in particular in a cloud, wherein the available laser types, in particular laser units, are likewise connected or being connected, to the cloud.

28. The method according to claim 17, wherein the job is stored by the central operator software for a wide variety of laser types in the cloud.

29. The method according to claim 17, wherein the job can be loaded and processed simultaneously by one or more laser units, in particular laser plotters and/or gravo marking lasers, of the same and different locations.

30. The method according to claim 17, wherein, when the job is changed on a laser unit, in particular a laser plotter and/or gravo marking laser, these changes are made available to the further laser unit processing this job, in particular are displayed.

31. The method according to claim 17, wherein, when a laser unit is connected to the web-based central operator software, all settings/parameters and the location relating to this laser unit are automatically uploaded and stored in a web-based database.

32. The method according to claim 17, wherein, when downloading the job from a laser unit, in particular a laser plotter and/or gravo marking laser, the safety policies corresponding to the location are adapted.

Description

[0031] The figures show:

[0032] FIG. 1 a schematic illustration of the method for generating a job via a central operator software for various laser types or laser units, respectively, simplified, for illustrative purposes only;

[0033] FIG. 2 a schematic illustration of a workflow for the creation of a job from a central operator software for various laser types, simplified, for illustrative purposes only;

[0034] FIG. 3 a screenshot of the user interface, simplified, for illustrative purposes only;

[0035] FIG. 4 a further screenshot of the user interface, simplified, for illustrative purposes only.

[0036] It should be stated by way of introduction that, in the individual embodiments, the same parts are provided with the same reference numbers or same component designations, respectively, wherein the disclosures contained in the entire description can, by analogy, be transferred to identical parts with identical reference numbers or identical component designations, respectively. The position details selected in the description, such as, e.g., top, bottom, lateral, etc., likewise relate to the figure described, and in the event of a change of position, they are to be transferred to the new position by analogy. Individual features or feature combinations from the exemplary embodiments shown and described may also represent independent inventive solutions.

[0037] In FIGS. 1 to 4 a process flow for a central operator software 1 is shown, which is used for various laser devices or laser units 2, respectively. Here, the operator software 1 is used on the one hand for so-called laser plotters 2a and on the other hand for so-called galvo marking lasers 2b.

[0038] I.e., a user creates and uses a job for processing a workpiece with the same operator software 1.

[0039] Preferably, the operator software 1 has a web-based structure, so that it is installed in a cloud 4 via the internet 3. In this case, a user 5,6,7 can access it via a web browser 8 by entering the address via the internet 3, so that the user interface of the operator software 1 is displayed in the browser 8 and corresponding input can be made to create a job 9,10 for a wide variety of laser units 2, in particular laser plotters 2a and/or galvo marking lasers 2b. Preferably, each user 5-7 has a personal login, so that a corresponding assignment can be made easily. Advantageously, several manufacturers or companies 11, respectively, can create a company login or company network 11, respectively, so that several users 5,6 of a company can individually or simultaneously access the central operator software 1 and thereby see all laser devices 2 or laser units 2, respectively, assigned to this company. In this case, company-related laser units 2 are not publicly visible, so that only users 5,6 of this company network who have the appropriate authorization can see and address these laser units 2 via the central operator software 1. It is of course possible for an authorized user 5,6, in particular an administrator 5, of the company network 11 to make one or more laser units 2 publicly accessible, so that corresponding jobs 9, 10 are also sent by external users 7 to these laser units 2 for a commissioned job.

[0040] As can now be seen from FIG. 1, a user 5-7 connects to the internet 3 and subsequently to the central operator software 1 in the cloud 4 via the browser 8, which can be opened on a laptop 8a, computer, tablet 8b or cell phone 8c, for example. Here, a user 5-7 enters an appropriate internet address, in particular a so-called IP address, so that a connection is established. The user interface of the central operator software 1 is then displayed in the browser 8. The user 5-7 can now use the operator software 1 normally, as if it were installed on his component, for example the laptop 8a, the computer, the tablet 8b, or the cell phone 8c.

[0041] To enable the users 5-7 to also to select the available laser units 2 via the central operator software 1, the laser units 2 are equipped with corresponding components, in particular a network card, so that by connecting a laser unit 2 to the internet 3, this laser unit 2 can be registered and configured in the cloud 4, in particular the central operator software 1. Thereby, the laser units 2 can be configured in such a way that they are publicly visible or visible only in the own company's network 11.

[0042] According to the present disclosure, it is now envisioned that all laser units 2 of different designs, i.e. all laser plotters 2a and galvo marking lasers 2b, are connected to the central operator software 1 and can also be selected. In this case, the operator software 1 creates both a job 9 for a laser plotter 2a and a job 10 for a galvo marking laser 2b, whereas in the prior art two different softwares are required for this purpose. This ensures that the user 5-7 needs to operate only one user interface to create a job 9,10 for one or both laser types.

[0043] For the sake of completeness, it is mentioned that in the laser units at least one beam source in the form of a laser is used in a housing, wherein a workpiece 12, 13 is deposited in a defined manner on a processing table in the processing chamber of the housing and a laser beam emitted by the beam source is sent via deflecting elements to at least one focusing unit, from which the laser beam is deflected in the direction of the workpiece and focused for processing. Control, in particular the position control of the workpiece with respect to the laser beam, is carried out by means of a control software running in a control unit in which the job 9 or 10 is processed, so that the workpiece is processed line by line by adjusting a movement system, such as a carriage in the case of a laser plotter 2a or an angular adjustment in the case of a galvo marking laser 2b. The two laser units 2 differ particularly in the motion control and the focusing lens used, in particular regarding the beam diameter.

[0044] These essential differences are thereby taken into account by an analysis tool 14 during the creation of the job 9,10.

[0045] For a job 9 and/or 10 now to be created, a user 5-7 must create or import only its diagram, respectively, and/or picture or the text and set some few parameters 15. For increased user-friendliness, the user 5-7 needs to enter only four parameters 15, namely:

[0046] 15a Material of the workpiece

[0047] 15b Thickness of the workpiece

[0048] 15c Effect for engraving or engraving depth, respectively

[0049] 15d Cutting effect;

as shown schematically in FIG. 3 by illustrating a screen interface of the operator software. Thus, even untrained employees or so-called laymen are enabled to make the setting of the parameters 15. For this purpose, the user 5-7 creates or imports a graphic and/or text in the central operator software 1, whereupon the parameters “material 15a, material thickness 15b, engraving depth or effect 15c, respectively, and cutting effect 15d” are set in the central operator software 1 for creation of the job 9 or 10. Subsequently, the operator software 1 suggests or determines, respectively, a laser type—laser plotter 2a or galvo marking laser 2b—or the user selects the desired laser type—laser plotter or galvo marking laser—as shown in FIG. 4 of an excerpt from the user interface 1a, whereupon, after selection of the laser type 2, the movement parameters of the selected laser type 2 required for the generation of the graphics and/or text are determined or calculated, respectively, and specified by the analysis tool 14, whereupon the laser power and speed are calculated and specified by the analysis tool 14 and the job 9 or 10 is created. Such a workflow is shown schematically in FIG. 2. Of course, it is possible for the user 5-7 to change any parameter 15.

[0050] It is possible for the operator software 1 and/or the analysis tool 14 to access a database 16, in particular a material database, in which further parameters 15 for processing a wide variety of materials are stored. Furthermore, other safety-relevant parameters 15 may be stored in this database 16, which are also taken into account by the analysis tool 14. For this purpose, machine-related data, such as lenses used, filter type, etc., are also stored, which are essential for the creation and selection of the laser unit 2. Of course, it is also possible for such machine-related data to be queried online directly by the analysis tool 14 from the respective laser units 2 via the internet connection. In particular, this is used whenever the user 5-7 selects a particular laser unit 2 that the analysis tool 14 accesses during creation and calculation of the job 9,10 and queries the relevant data. Among other things, the analysis tool 14 also takes into account the lenses used in the laser units 2 and the resulting beam diameters, i.e., if a laser unit 2 is selected and the resolution or quality, respectively, is too high and cannot be achieved by a beam diameter that is too thick, a message appears indicating that the selected quality cannot be achieved, or that another laser unit should be selected to achieve the quality.

[0051] Thus, it can be said that the customer or user 5-7, respectively, can perform all steps relevant to the creation of a workpiece 13,14 in the central web-based operator software 1, to which he or she can connect via a browser 8, wherein no additional software packages are required. By mapping a holistic system, work steps are optimized for each other, and interface inefficiencies completely eliminated. Laser population with process and work parameters is possible from a single point of contact, namely the cloud 4. Job data can be managed here and directly assigned to a respective laser or laser unit 2, respectively, and also started. For this purpose, a job database 17 can be populated directly, in which the created jobs 9, 10 for all laser units 2, i.e. for laser plotter 2a and galvo marking laser 2b, are stored. It is also possible to have order data transmitted via various attributes.

[0052] Thanks to the integration of the job database 17 in the cloud 4 or due to the storage possibility of the jobs 9,10 in the cloud 4, respectively, the job 9,10 for the workpiece processing can be downloaded by the web-based database 17 or cloud 4, respectively, directly from the laser device or the laser unit 2, respectively, wherein before the start of the download or during the download, the location of the laser device 2 or of the laser unit 2, respectively, is determined or queried, respectively, whereupon the applicable policies of the safety settings and, if necessary, further settings or parameters, respectively, for the determined location, in particular the country or region, respectively, are determined and the associated parameters, in particular so-called safety parameters, are checked in the job 9,10 and, if necessary, adjusted, i.e., that the jobs 9, 10 in the job database 17 are assigned to the individual laser units 2, which are successively processed, wherein these are adapted according to the processing location to the policies prescribed there. Thus, an automatic or manual download of the job 9,10 can be performed, and the user 5-7 does not have to make any further adaptations.

[0053] Preferably, the jobs 9,10 are downloaded manually since the operator of the laser unit 2 usually has to insert the workpiece 12,13 into the processing chamber of the laser unit 2. However, if the laser 2 has an automatic feeding device and an automatic removal device, the laser can independently load and process the jobs 9,10 assigned to it.

[0054] This enables the customer or user 5-7, respectively, to prepare his/her files, i.e. the jobs 9,10, for the laser 2 anywhere in the world and then go to the device and retrieve them there and process them immediately. Automatic adaptation of the job 9,10 to site regulations ensures compliance with all machine safety policies.

[0055] This makes it possible for the first time for jobs 9,10 to be generated in the web-based software 1 or operator software 1, respectively, independently of the laser units 2 and location, and to be exchanged between all possible laser devices 2 or laser units 2, respectively, and locations without additional adjustments by the user 5-7, wherein whenever a laser type is changed, for example from a galvo marking laser 2b to a laser plotter 2a, a recalculation is performed by the analysis tool 14 to adjust the movement parameters. This is made possible by an open format of programming called “MIP”. This is a text-based command language for lasers 2, in which metadata (number of instructions, control of peripherals such as: extractions, etc.) +machine commands are included. Here, the exchange of jobs 9,10 between different types of machines, i.e., a laser plotter 2a and a gravo marking laser 2b, for the analysis tool 14 is based on the following aspects:

[0056] A central material database 16 (e.g. the cloud 4)

[0057] Absolute parameters and no percentages, as known from the prior art

[0058] A central exchange option of jobs 9, 10 via the cloud 4

[0059] An intelligence that transforms material parameters between devices 2

[0060] Standardization of the devices 2 to each other,

[0061] As well as the location for the policies.

[0062] Furthermore, it is possible for the customer or user 5-7, respectively, to import his/her own files, in particular self-created graphics or text or old jobs, into the central web-based operator software 1. During import into the laser software or operator software 1, respectively, the graphics or text are automatically prepared for the laser process in the best possible way and any defective areas are repaired with regard to the laser process without any further action on the part of the user 5-7. The user 5-7 does not need to prepare the files in a manual and time-consuming way.

[0063] In this process, imported files are checked for possible defective points by the operator software, in particular the analysis tool:

[0064] Incompletely closed contours on which the laser would stop unintentionally.

[0065] Unconnected elements

[0066] Intersections of geometries

[0067] Changes in directions of adjacent elements

[0068] Duplications of identical elements are reduced to a single entity

[0069] Sub-graphics are reduced to a single graphic.

This reduces the machine movement and cycle time significantly.

[0070] Thus, it can be said that a new usage is provided to the customer or user 5-7, respectively, which enables even untrained users 5-7 to use it immediately. Laser settings such as laser power or speed are abstracted to such an extent that no explicit basic technical understanding is required to use the laser machine 2. Users or customers, respectively, 5-7 only need to select the material to be processed, material thickness, effect (desired quality) and cutting effect to have all other parameters 15 determined by the analysis tool 14. For the convenience of the user 5-7, the effects 15c may comprise the following selection items: “Fine-detail engraving”, “High-contrast engraving”, “Photo engraving”, “Deep engraving”, “Fast cutting”, “Precise cutting”, “. . . ”. It is also possible to have colors or layers assigned to a desired material effect, as known from the prior art.

[0071] However, the cloud 4 is also used to operate and control a laser device 2 for engraving, marking, lettering and/or cutting a flat workpiece. In this case, the job 9,10 for the workpiece processing is downloaded from a web-based database 17 or cloud 4, respectively, directly by the laser device 2 or laser unit 1, respectively, in particular the laser plotter 2a and/or galvo marking laser 2b, wherein before the start of the download or during the download, the location of the laser is determined or queried, respectively, whereupon the applicable policies of the safety settings and, if necessary, further settings or parameters, respectively, for the determined location, in particular the country or region, respectively, are determined and the associated parameters, in particular so-called safety parameters, are checked in the job and, if necessary, adjusted, i.e., depending on the country or region, respectively, the downloaded job 9,10 is automatically adapted to the policies applicable there for processing the workpiece 12,13 by a laser, so that the user no longer has to make any adjustments. It has turned out advantageous that the determined policies for the various locations, in particular countries or regions, respectively, are stored in a web-based database 17 or in the cloud 4, respectively.

[0072] As a matter of form, it should finally be emphasized that, for the better understanding of the structure of the engraving workflow 1 and its components or constituent parts, respectively, the same have in part been represented not to scale and/or enlarged and/or reduced in size, and above all only schematically.

[0073] In addition, individual features or feature combinations from the various exemplary embodiments shown and described can inherently form independent inventive solutions or solutions according to the present disclosure.