Magnetic testing of valuable documents

Abstract

The magnetic checking of value documents with highly coercive and/or lowly coercive magnetic regions, involves after the magnetization of all magnetic regions in a first direction, a second magnetization is effected, in which only the lowly coercive magnetic material is re-magnetized, but the highly coercive magnetic material remains aligned in the first magnetization direction. Magnetic signals are detected with an inductive magnetic detector, having several measuring tracks transverse to the transport direction of the value document. To evaluate the magnetic signals of the measuring tracks, the strongest two local minima and/or maxima of the respective magnetic signal are ascertained by a measuring track as a function of time. A minima comparison value and/or maxima comparison value of the respective measuring track is determined. The magnetic coding of the security element is checked on the basis of the minima comparison values and/or maxima comparison values of the measuring tracks.

Claims

1. A method for checking a value document which has a security element with at least one lowly coercive magnetic region and/or with at least one highly coercive magnetic region, wherein the lowly coercive magnetic region contains a lowly coercive magnetic material with a first coercive field strength, and the highly coercive magnetic region contains a highly coercive magnetic material with a second coercive field strength which is greater than the first coercive field strength, wherein the following steps are carried out in the method: first magnetization of the security element by a first magnetic field region whose magnetic field strength is greater than the second coercive field strength, so that the magnetization of the possibly present lowly coercive magnetic material and the magnetization of the possibly present highly coercive magnetic material are aligned in a first magnetization direction, second magnetization of the security element by a second magnetic field region whose magnetic field strength is greater than the first coercive field strength, but smaller than the second coercive field strength, wherein the magnetic field direction of the second magnetic field region is oriented such that the magnetization of the possibly present lowly coercive magnetic material is aligned due to the second magnetization in a second magnetization direction different from the first magnetization direction, transporting the value document along a transport direction past a magnetic detector, in particular an inductive magnetic detector, which has several measuring tracks transverse to the transport direction of the value document, in which the magnetic detector detects a magnetic signal in each case as a function of time, evaluating the magnetic signals of the security element detected by the individual measuring tracks, wherein for several of the measuring tracks in each case the two strongest local minima of the respective magnetic signal and/or the strongest two local maxima of the respective magnetic signal are ascertained, which the respective magnetic signal of the respective measuring track has as a function of time, a minima comparison value of the respective measuring track is determined by comparing the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local minimum with the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local minimum and/or a maxima comparison value of the respective measuring track is determined by comparing the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local maximum with the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local maximum, and checking a magnetic coding of the security element on the basis of the minima comparison values of several of the measuring tracks, and/or on the basis of the maxima comparison values of several of the measuring tracks.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein, when checking the magnetic coding of the security element, it is checked for several of the measuring tracks, in each case on the basis of the minima comparison value and/or on the basis of the maxima comparison value of the respective measuring track, whether the security element has a lowly coercive magnetic region or a highly coercive magnetic region in the respective section whose magnetic signal has been detected by the respective measuring track.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein, when checking the magnetic coding of the security element, it is decided on the basis of the minima comparison values and/or on the basis of the maxima comparison values of several measuring tracks whether the security element is assigned to a first or a second security element category.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the security element is assigned to a first security element category if, for a minimum number of measuring tracks, the minima comparison value computed for the respective measuring track exceeds the first threshold and/or for a minimum number of measuring tracks the maximum value computed for the respective measuring track undershoots the first threshold, and otherwise the security element is assigned to a second security element category.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the absolute amount of the strongest local minimum of the respective magnetic signal or the absolute amount of the strongest local maximum of the respective magnetic signal, which the respective magnetic signal of the respective measuring track has as a function of time, is compared with an insignificance threshold and, if the insignificance threshold is exceeded, it is concluded that the security element has a magnetic region in the respective section of the security element whose magnetic signal has been detected by the respective measuring track.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the minima comparison value of the respective measuring track is a minima difference between the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local minimum and the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local minimum or vice versa, or that the minima comparison value of the respective measuring track is a minima ratio between the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local minimum and the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local minimum or vice versa.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the maxima comparison value of the respective measuring track is a maxima difference between the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local maximum and the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local maximum or vice versa, or that the maxima comparison value is a maxima ratio between the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local maximum and the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local maximum or vice versa.

8. The method according to claim 1, wherein for one or several measuring tracks of the magnetic detector the respective minima comparison value and/or the respective maxima comparison value is compared with a first threshold, wherein the magnetic coding of the security element is checked in particular based on whether the minima comparison value(s) of the respective measuring track exceed(s) or undershoot(s) the first threshold and/or based on whether the maxima comparison value(s) of the respective measuring track undershoot(s) or exceed(s) the first threshold.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein depending on whether the minima comparison value of the respective measuring track exceeds or undershoots the first threshold and/or depending on whether the maxima comparison value of the respective measuring track undershoots or exceeds the first threshold, it is decided whether the security element has a highly coercive or a lowly coercive magnetic region in the respective section whose magnetic signal has been detected by the respective measuring track.

10. The method according to claim 8, wherein for one or several measuring tracks of the magnetic detector the respective minima comparison value and/or the respective maxima comparison value is additionally compared with a second threshold, and in the case that the minima comparison value(s) of the respective measuring track and/or the maxima comparison value(s) of the respective measuring track lies between the first threshold and that of the second threshold, it is decided that the security element has a combined magnetic region which has both the highly coercive and the lowly coercive magnetic material in the respective section whose magnetic signal has been detected by the respective measuring track.

11. A checking apparatus for checking a value document which has a security element with at least one lowly coercive magnetic region and/or with at least one highly coercive magnetic region, wherein the highly coercive magnetic region has a highly coercive magnetic material with a second coercive field strength whose magnetization is aligned in a first magnetization direction, and the lowly coercive magnetic region contains a lowly coercive magnetic material with a first coercive field strength which is smaller than the second coercive field strength, wherein the magnetization of the highly coercive magnetic material is aligned in a first magnetization direction and the magnetization of the lowly coercive magnetic material is aligned in a second magnetization direction different from the first magnetization direction, wherein the checking apparatus has the following: a magnetic detector, in particular an inductive magnetic detector, which is adapted to detect magnetic signals of the value document transported along a transport direction past the magnetic detector, wherein the magnetic detector has several measuring tracks transverse to the transport direction of the value document and is adapted to detect in the measuring tracks a magnetic signal in each case as a function of time, an evaluation device which is adapted to evaluate the magnetic signals of the security element which are detected by the magnetic detector in the individual measuring tracks, wherein the evaluation device is adapted for several of the measuring tracks in each case to ascertain the strongest two local minima of the respective magnetic signal and/or the strongest two local maxima of the respective magnetic signal, which the respective magnetic signal of the respective measuring track as a function of time, and to determine a minima comparison value of the respective measuring track by comparing the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local minimum with the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local minimum and/or to determine a maxima comparison value of the respective measuring track by comparing the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local maximum with the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local maximum, and wherein the evaluation device is adapted to check a magnetic coding of the security element on the basis of the minima comparison values of several of the measuring tracks and/or on the basis of the maxima comparison values of several of the measuring tracks.

12. The checking apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the evaluation device is adapted, when checking the magnetic coding of the security element for several of the measuring tracks in each case on the basis of the minima comparison value and/or on the basis of the maxima comparison value of the respective measuring track, to decide whether the security element is assigned to a first or a second security element category, and/or to check whether the security element has a lowly coercive or a highly coercive magnetic region in the respective section whose magnetic signal has been detected by the respective measuring track.

13. The checking apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the checking apparatus has one or several magnets which supply a first magnetic field region for the first magnetization of the security element and a second magnetic field region for the second magnetization of the security element, which, viewed along a transport path of the value document through the checking apparatus, is arranged behind the first magnetic field region and in front of the magnetic detector, wherein the magnetic field strength of the first magnetic field region is greater than that of the second magnetic field region and wherein the magnetic field direction of the second magnetic field region is different from that of the first magnetic field region.

14. A value document processing apparatus with a checking apparatus according to claim 11, and a transport device for transporting the value document past the magnetic detector along a transport direction.

15. The value document processing apparatus according to claim 14 with a checking apparatus wherein the checking apparatus has one or several magnets which supply a first magnetic field region for the first magnetization of the security element and a second magnetic field region for the second magnetization of the security element, which, viewed along a transport path of the value document through the checking apparatus, is arranged behind the first magnetic field region and in front of the magnetic detector, wherein the magnetic field strength of the first magnetic field region is greater than that of the second magnetic field region and wherein the magnetic field direction of the second magnetic field region is different from that of the first magnetic field region, wherein the magnets of the checking apparatus, which supply the first and second magnetic field regions, are arranged along the transport path of the value document through the value document processing apparatus spaced apart from the magnetic detector.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Hereinafter the invention will be explained by way of example with reference to the following figures. The figures are described as follows:

(2) FIG. 1 a value document processing apparatus with a magnetization device, a magnetic detector and an evaluation device,

(3) FIG. 2 the course of the magnetic field lines for the magnetization device from FIG. 1,

(4) FIG. 3a-d magnetic signals of the inductive magnetic detector: for a lowly coercive magnetic region (FIG. 3a), for a highly coercive magnetic region (FIG. 3b), for a combined magnetic region (FIG. 3c), for a measuring track lying in the vicinity of the magnetic regions of the security element (FIG. 3d),

(5) FIG. 4a-d a first example of a security element (FIGS. 4a, 4c) and the minima ratio v (FIG. 4b) and the maxima ratio V (FIG. 4d) ascertained for this along the security element,

(6) FIG. 5a-d a second example of a security element (FIGS. 5a, 5c) and the minima ratio v (FIG. 5b) and the maxima ratio V (FIG. 5d) ascertained for this along the security element.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS EMBODIMENTS

(7) FIG. 1 schematically shows a detail from a value document processing apparatus which is adapted to check a magnetizable security element 31 of a value document 30. The value document processing apparatus contains a checking apparatus 100, which has an inductive magnetic detector 50 and an evaluation device 60, and possibly further elements (not shown), such as, for example, input and output devices for value documents and operating elements. The value document processing apparatus has a transport device 17 and a magnetization device 10 made up of two opposing magnets 11, 12, which are arranged along the transport path of the value document in front of the inductive magnetic detector 50 and spaced apart therefrom.

(8) In this example, the security element 31 has a lowly coercive magnetic material with a first, small coercive field strength and a highly coercive magnetic material with a second, greater coercive field strength, which are contained in several sections of the security element transverse to the transport direction (y-direction). Thus, a highly coercive magnetic region h of the security element 31 has only the highly coercive magnetic material, but not the lowly coercive magnetic material, and a lowly coercive magnetic region 1 of the security element 31 only has the lowly coercive magnetic material, but not the highly coercive magnetic material. The security element 31 can alternatively also have only one type of these magnetic materials. Possibly, a combined magnetic region k can also be present, which has both aforementioned magnetic materials. The present magnetic regions h or 1 or h, 1 or h, k, 1 form a magnetic coding of the security element 31.

(9) The value document 30 with the security element 31 is transported along a transport direction T by means of the transport device 17 of the value document processing apparatus. In FIG. 1, two upper and two lower transport belts are shown by way of example, between which the value document 30 is clamped and transported. But the transport device 17 can also comprise transport rollers. Before the security element 31 is checked, it is magnetized by the two magnets 11, 12 in such a fashion that the magnetization directions of the highly and lowly coercive magnetic regions h, 1 differ from one another. In the example of FIG. 1, the magnetization directions lie at least approximately anti-parallel to one another. For this purpose, the magnetization device supplies along the transport region a first magnetic field region 15 and a second magnetic field region 16 downstream of the first magnetic field region in the transport direction T, cf. FIG. 2.

(10) The two magnetic field regions 15, 16 previously described are produced by means of two bar magnets 11, 12 which lie opposite one another with respect to both their north poles N and their south poles S. In the present embodiment example, the magnet axes 13 and 14 of the two magnets 11, 12 are aligned parallel to one another and to the transport direction T, but they can also lie contrary to the transport direction T. By employing two magnets arranged in this fashion to produce the two magnetic field regions 15, 16, an anti-parallel magnetization of the highly and lowly coercive magnetic regions is achieved with little effort.

(11) The magnetic field lines of the magnetic field produced by such a magnetization device 10 are shown schematically in FIG. 2, which shows these magnetic field lines in a plane parallel to the x and z axes of FIG. 1, which plane intersects the two magnets 11 and 12 in their center. Accordingly, viewed in the z-direction, a magnetic field aligned in the transport direction T (first magnetic field region 15) lies exactly in the center between the magnets and, viewed in the x-direction, between the poles N, S of the magnets 11, 12. Viewed in the transport direction T downstream thereof and behind the two magnets 11, 12, there is a magnetic field (second magnetic field region 16) with a smaller magnetic field strength, which is aligned contrary to the transport direction T. In the present example, the magnetic field directions are oriented parallel or anti-parallel to the transport direction of the value document. But one or both can also be oriented differently, for example perpendicularly to the transport direction T of the value document (parallel or anti-parallel to the y-direction or z-direction shown in FIG. 1) or obliquely to these directions.

(12) Alternatively, the two magnetic regions 15, 16 can also be produced by a single magnet 11 or 12 or by two or four magnets whose magnet axes lie perpendicularly to the transport direction (z direction), for example which are arranged above and/or below the value document and face each other with their magnetic poles of the same name lying opposite one another. Instead of the anti-parallel alignment, other angles to one another can also be selected for the two magnetic field directions.

(13) A first magnetization is achieved through the first magnetic field region 15, in which both the magnetization of the lowly coercive magnetic region 1 and that of the highly coercive magnetic region h are aligned along the transport direction T. In the second magnetic field region 16, only the magnetization of the lowly coercive magnetic region 1 is changed contrary to the transport direction T. Since the magnetic field strength of the second magnetic field region 16 is smaller than the second coercive field strength, the highly coercive magnetic region h is not re-magnetized by the second magnetic field region 16. The magnetization of the lowly coercive magnetic region 1 is, however, aligned approximately anti-parallel to the transport direction T by the second magnetization.

(14) In this example, the combined magnetic region k is configured such that the lowly coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region and the highly coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region have at least approximately the same remanent flux density. When, in this case, the lowly coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region is magnetized anti-parallel to the highly coercive magnetic material of the combined magnetic region by the second magnetic field, a vanishing resultant magnetization of the respective combined magnetic region k is ideally achieved.

(15) After the first and second magnetizations in the two magnetic field regions 15, 16, magnetic signals of the security element are detected by the inductive magnetic detector 50 and the magnetic signals are evaluated in order to check the magnetic coding of the security element. For spatially resolved capture of the magnetization of the security element, the inductive magnetic detector 50 has several measuring tracks L (four in FIG. 1), for each of which an inductive measuring head is available. Each of the inductive measuring heads has two measuring coils 51 with a soft-magnetic core and a magnet 52 located in between for producing a magnetic field that is constant over time. During the capture of the magnetic signals, the magnetic field produced by the respective magnet 52 acts on the security element 31. To produce the magnetic field constant over time, a single, appropriately dimensioned magnet can also be employed for all measuring tracks. When a magnetized security element 31 is transported past, a current is induced in the respective measuring coil 51. The measuring coils 51 produce corresponding signals, which are referred to as magnetic signals. The two measuring coils 51 of the respective measuring head are preferably connected in difference to one another, so that the difference signal of the two measuring coils 51 is produced as the magnetic signal for each measuring track L. This differential circuit makes it possible to minimize external magnetic influences acting simultaneously on both measuring coils 51, since the electrical signals of the measuring coils 51 cancel each other out in the case of contrarily directed interconnection. For further processing, the magnetic signals M of each measuring track L can each be amplified with a separate amplifier. The magnetic signals M produced in this fashion are subsequently evaluated by means of the evaluation device 60 in order to check the magnetic coding of the security element.

(16) For example, to check the magnetic coding, the magnetic signals are only evaluated to the effect that the security element is assigned to one (of two or several) security element categories. For this purpose, it can be sufficient to determine whether the magnetic signal of a highly coercive magnetic region h (or possibly also of a combined magnetic region k) was detected in any of the measuring tracks L along the security element (multicode security element) or whether only other magnetic signals were detected (no multicode security element).

(17) To check the magnetic coding, the magnetic signals of the security element can be evaluated with regard to the presence of the individual previously described magnetic regions h, 1 (and possibly also k) on the security element. Given a correspondingly high spatial resolution of the magnetic detector 50 compared to the length of the magnetic regions of the magnetic coding, the magnetic signals can possibly also be evaluated to identify each individual magnetic region and the sequence and arrangement of the magnetic regions on the security element in order to check the magnetic coding of the security element 31.

(18) In FIG. 3a, the magnetic signal M.sub.1 is shown by way of example, which the respective inductive measuring head of the magnetic detector 50 produces as a function of time t or as a function of position x along the value document transported past (at the magnetic detector 50), when a lowly coercive magnet transports region 1 is transported past it (differential circuit of the two measuring coils 51). The corresponding magnetic signal M.sub.h is shown in FIG. 3b, which the respective inductive measuring head produces when a highly coercive magnetic region h is transported past it. In FIG. 3c, the corresponding magnetic signal M.sub.k is shown, which the respective inductive measuring head produces when a combined magnetic region k is transported past it. And in FIG. 3d the corresponding magnetic signal M.sub.0 is shown, which is detected in a measuring track L which lies outside the magnetic regions of the security element (offset thereto in the y-direction) but in the vicinity of the magnetic regions.

(19) The exact form of the magnetic signals of the individual magnetic regions depends on the type of magnetic detector employed. The magnetic signals of the magnetic regions 1, h and k shown in FIGS. 3a-d have a complex structure made up of several minima and maxima. The complexity of these magnetic signals is based on the measuring technology employed, in which two inductive measuring heads are connected in difference. The difference between the magnetic signal M.sub.1 of the lowly coercive magnetic region 1 compared to the magnetic signal M.sub.h of the highly coercive magnetic region h is based substantially on its reversed magnetization (produced by the magnetic field region 16).

(20) However, the magnetic field of the magnet 52 located between the measuring heads also influences the form of the magnetic signals, since this magnetic field leads to a re-magnetization of the lowly coercive magnetic material during the detection process or between the detection processes of the two measuring coils 51. This applies in particular to the magnetic signal M.sub.k of the combined magnetic region k, which is magnetized by the second magnetic field region 16 in such a fashion that its magnetization resulting from the first and second magnetization almost disappears. Before the start of the measurement of the first measuring coil 51 there is therefore hardly any magnetization of the combined magnetic region k present, but after the first measuring coil 51 the magnet 52 produces a resulting magnetization through the above-mentioned re-magnetization of the lowly coercive magnetic material between the detection processes of the two measuring coils 51.

(21) The magnetic signal M.sub.0 also has maxima and minima, but has a significantly smaller amplitude than the other magnetic signals in which the respective magnetic region has exactly met with the respective measuring track in the y-direction. In order to rule out a misjudgment of the (too) low maxima and minima of the magnetic signal M.sub.0, the absolute amount of the strongest maximum or the strongest minimum of the respective magnetic signal is compared with an insignificance threshold g, cf. FIGS. 3a-d. The comparison can be carried out by the magnetic detector 50 or the evaluation device 60. If the insignificance threshold g is undershot, as is the case here with the magnetic signal M.sub.0, the magnetic signal of the respective measuring track L is ignored for the further evaluation. If the insignificance threshold g is exceeded, as is the case here with the magnetic signals M.sub.1, M.sub.h and M.sub.k, the respective magnetic signal is employed to check the coding of the security element.

(22) The evaluation device 60, which is programmed with a corresponding evaluation software, ascertains for these magnetic signals M.sub.1, M.sub.h and M.sub.k for example the respectively strongest two local minima m1, m2 of the respective magnetic signal (the local minima with the largest absolute value), which the respective magnetic signal of the respective measuring track L has as a function of position x or time tin the region of the security element. By comparing the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local minimum m2 with the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local minimum m1, the evaluation device 60 determines a minima comparison value of the respective measuring track, for example a minimum ratio v=m2/m1 or v=m1/m2 or a minimum difference u=m1−m2 or u=m2−m1. In order to check the magnetic coding of the security element, the minima comparison values v or u of several measuring tracks L are evaluated.

(23) As an alternative or in addition to the minima evaluation, the evaluation device can also carry out a maxima evaluation in which it ascertains the two strongest local maxima M1, M2 of the respective magnetic signal (the local maxima with the largest absolute value) and, by comparing the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the second strongest local maximum M2 with the amplitude of the magnetic signal in the strongest local maximum M1, determines a maxima comparison value of the respective measuring track L, for example a maxima ratio V=M2/M1 or V=M1/M2 or a maxima difference U=M1−M2 or U=M2−M1. In order to check the magnetic coding of the security element, the maxima comparison values V or U of several measuring tracks L can be evaluated alone or in addition to the minima comparison values u or v. Possibly, both can also be offset against each other.

(24) In FIG. 4 a, an example of a security element 31 is shown, whose magnetic coding has only two lowly coercive magnetic regions 1. FIG. 4b shows the minima comparison values v=m2/m1, which the evaluation device ascertains from the magnetic signals of an inductive magnetic detector 50 with eight measuring tracks L1-L8 for the security element 31, cf. FIG. 1. The magnetic signals of the measuring tracks L2, L3 and L6 have minima comparison values v of around 0.25, as expected for lowly coercive magnetic regions 1. The magnetic signals of the remaining measuring tracks lie below the insignificance threshold g. The minima comparison values v=m2/m1 of the measuring tracks L2, L3, and L6 are compared with a first threshold t1 stored in the evaluation device 60, which amounts to around 0.35, for example. Due to the undershooting of the first threshold t1, it is concluded that the security element has lowly coercive magnetic regions 1 in the (y) sections whose magnetic signals have been detected by the measuring tracks L2, L3 and L6. The security element 31 from FIG. 4a is therefore assigned to a first category which is referred to, for example, as “magnetic coding without highly coercive magnetic material” or “no multicode security element”.

(25) FIG. 4c is identical to FIG. 4a. FIG. 4d shows the corresponding maxima comparison values V=M2/M1 for the security element 31 from FIGS. 4a, c, which were ascertained for the magnetic signals of the measuring tracks L2, L3 and L6. The maxima comparison values V of these measuring tracks are in the range 0.7 and thus above a first threshold t1=0.55 (selected differently for the maxima evaluation) with which they are compared. Due to the exceeding of the first threshold t1, it is concluded also in the maxima evaluation that the magnetic signals detected in the measuring tracks L2, L3 and L6 were produced by lowly coercive magnetic regions. The security element 31 from FIGS. 4a, c is therefore also assigned to the first category (“magnetic coding without highly coercive magnetic region” or “no multicode security element”) by the maxima evaluation.

(26) In FIG. 5a (identical to FIG. 5c) another example of a security element 31 is shown, whose magnetic coding has two highly coercive magnetic regions h and a lowly coercive magnetic region 1 and a combined magnetic region k. Its minima evaluation is shown on the basis of FIG. 5b and its maxima evaluation on the basis of FIG. 5d.

(27) From the magnetic signals (cf. FIG. 3a-c) of a magnetic detector 50 with 8 measuring tracks L1-L8, the evaluation device 60 ascertains the minima comparison values v=m2/m1, cf. FIG. 5 b, for the security element 31 from FIGS. 5a, c. A minima comparison value v of around 0.25, as expected for a lowly coercive magnetic region 1, is ascertained only for the magnetic signal of the measuring track L3. For the magnetic signals of the measuring tracks L5 and L7, significantly larger minima comparison values v in the range 0.85 are ascertained. A minima comparison value v of around 0.45 is ascertained for the magnetic signal of the measuring track L2 and the magnetic signals of the remaining measuring tracks lie below the insignificance threshold g. The minima comparison values v=m2/m1 of the measuring tracks L2, L3, L5 and L7 are also compared here with the first threshold t1=0.35, which is stored in the evaluation device 60 for the minima evaluation. Due to the exceeding of the first threshold t1 in the measuring tracks L2, L5 and L7, it is concluded that the magnetic signal detected there was not produced by lowly coercive magnetic regions, but that the security element must have sections with highly coercive magnetic material. The security element 31 from FIG. 5a, c is therefore assigned to a second category, which is referred to, for example, as “magnetic coding with highly coercive magnetic material” or “multicode security element”.

(28) The assignment of the security element 31 to the second category can be linked to the condition that the first threshold t1 must be exceeded for the minima comparison values of at least n measuring tracks L for the security element 31 to be assigned to the second category (“multicode security element”). For example, n=2, so that the minima comparison values of the first threshold t1 must be exceeded at at least two of the measuring tracks L for the security element 31 to be assigned to the second category. If, on the other hand, the first threshold t1 is only exceeded at a single measuring track L (i.e. less than n=2), the security element 31—like the security elements without highly coercive magnetic material—is assigned to the first category (“no multicode security element”). The minimum number n>1 (instead of n=1) is preferably used to check security elements whose magnetic coding is known to have more than one highly coercive or combined magnetic region h, k or one or several long magnetic regions h or k. This is because n>1 then ensures that a single magnetic signal whose minima comparison value exceeds the first threshold t1 does not yet lead to the security element being classified as a “multicode security element”, but only when this is the case in at least n measuring tracks L.

(29) If the evaluation device is also to be adapted to differentiate between combined magnetic regions k and highly coercive magnetic regions, a second threshold t2 can be stored in the software with which the minima comparison values v or the maxima comparison values V are compared. The second threshold t2 lies above the first threshold t1 for the minima evaluation, for example at around t2=0.65, in the maxima evaluation below the first threshold t1, for example at around t2=0.4. In the security element from FIGS. 5a, c, a magnetic signal is detected in the measuring track L2, whose minima comparison value v is around 0.45 and therefore lies above the first threshold t1 and below the second threshold t2, while the minima comparison value v for the measuring tracks L5 and L7 also exceed the second threshold t2, cf. FIG. 5b. Based on the finding that a minima comparison value lying between the two thresholds t1 and t2 is ascertained for at least one measuring track (here only L2), the security element can be assigned to a possibly employed third category (“multicode security element with combined magnetic region”). However, a corresponding categorization of the security element from FIGS. 5a, c can also take place on the basis of the maxima evaluation, based on the maxima comparison value of around 0.45, which also lies between the two thresholds t1 and t2, while the maxima comparison values V for the measuring tracks L5 and L7 undershoot the second threshold t2, cf. FIG. 5d.

(30) For a more precise check of the magnetic coding, if the first threshold t1 is undershot in the case of the minima evaluation, it can be concluded that the security element from FIG. 4a has one or several lowly coercive magnetic regions 1 in the y-sections, which correspond to the measuring tracks L2, L3 and L6, and no magnetic material (i.e. gap regions of the magnetic coding) in the remaining measuring tracks. For the security element from FIG. 5a, on the basis of the exceeding of the first threshold t1 in the measuring tracks L2, L5 and L7 in the case of the minima evaluation, it can be concluded that the security element has one or several highly coercive or combined magnetic regions k in the y-sections that correspond to the measuring tracks L2, L5 and L7 and—on the basis of the undershooting of the first threshold t1 in the measuring tracks L3—that the security element has a lowly coercive magnetic region 1 in the y-section corresponding to the measuring track L3. The relative or absolute y-positions of the lowly coercive magnetic regions 1, of the highly coercive magnetic regions h (and, possibly, the combined magnetic regions k) of the security element for a more precise check can be compared with reference data stored in the evaluation device 60 for several known security elements. On the basis of this comparison, the magnetic coding can, possibly, also be checked with regard to the sequence and/or arrangement of the various magnetic regions.