PEO-PPO-PEO triblock bipolymers, with amphoteric endings, as demulsifying agents for heavy crude oils

Abstract

Disclosed are chemical products useful for crude oil conditioning, particularly to demulsifying basic compounds. Disclosed are PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers, with amphoteric groups, β-amino acid derivatives, at the chain ends, which destabilize water-in-crude oil (W/O) emulsions, thereby removing emulsified water and salts dissolved salts in the aforementioned phase.

Claims

1. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers, having amphoteric end groups, having at least one of Formulas (2) and (3) ##STR00004## Where: IN=C.sub.2H.sub.4O.sub.2 (ethylene glycollate) R.sub.1 and R.sub.2=independent radicals represented by the groups: —H (hydrogen); —CH.sub.2(CH.sub.2).sub.AB; -CEGJ; —CH.sub.2CHLM; —CH.sub.2(CH.sub.2).sub.QM; where A is an integer from 1 to 11 and B is —H, EGJ are independent radicals represented by: —H, -methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, sec-butyl, iso-butyl, tert-butyl, n-butyl, phenyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopentyl, L is a radical representing methyl and ethyl, and M is a hydroxyl group, Q is an integer from 1 to 5; T is representing groups: EGJ and NO.sub.2, Cl, F, Br, R.sub.3=H (hydrogen), CH.sub.3 (methyl), methoxide (CH.sub.3O), R.sub.4=H (hydrogen), CH.sub.3 (methyl), C.sub.3H.sub.5O.sub.2 (carboxyethyl), C.sub.4H.sub.7O.sub.2 (carboxypropyl) and C.sub.5H.sub.9O.sub.2 (carboxybutyl), C.sub.2H.sub.4O (ethoxy), C.sub.4H.sub.8O (butoxy), U is an integer from 1 to 2; X represents oxygen or nitrogen atoms; with the proviso that when X=nitrogen then V is represented by methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, sec-butyl, iso-butyl, tert-butyl, n-butyl, phenyl, cyclopentyl or benzyl, Z represents a mono- or di-substitution at any ring position of 5- or 6-member rings, chosen from methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, sec-butyl, iso-butyl, tert-butyl, n-butyl, phenyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopentyl, benzyl or hydroxyl, w is an integer from 4 to 90, y is an integer from 6 to 104, wherein the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers are demulsifying agents capable of removing water dispersed in crude oils, wherein the crude oils have an API density from 3 to 40° API; and wherein the triblock biopolymers have number average molecular weight from 600 to 10,000 g/mol.

2. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups, according to claim 1, comprising one or more secondary amines chosen from: 1-ethylpropylamine, (2,2-dimethylpropyl)(methyl)amine, N-methyl-N-(1-phenylethyl)amine, bis(2-ethylhexyl)amine, N-benzyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)amine, diisopropylamine, 2-(methylamino)-ethanol, 2-(butylamino)-ethanol, 2-(benzylamino)-ethanol, 2-(cyclohexylamino)-ethanol, 2-(tert-butylamino)-ethanol, 2-(phenylamino)-ethanol, 2-(n-propylamino)-ethanol, 2-(iso-propylamino)-ethanol, 2-(hydroxymethylamino)-ethanol, 2,2′-iminodiethanol, 1,1′-iminodi-2-propanol, 4-(butylamino)-1-butanol, 1-benzylpiperazine, 1-phenylpiperazine, 2-(hexylamino)-ethanol, 1-(ortho-chlorophenyl)-piperazine, 1-ethylpiperazine, 1-(meta-tolyl)-piperazine, 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-piperazine, 4-benzylpiperidine, 4-methylpiperidine, 2-methylpiperidine, 2-ethylpiperidine, 3,5-dimethylpiperidine, piperidine-3-ol, piperidine-4-ol, trans-3,5-dimethylpiperidine, cis-3,5-dimethylpiperidine, 3-methylpiperidine, piperidine-3-ilmethanol, 3,3-dimethylpiperidine, 4-phenylpiperidine-3-ol, 4-phenyl-piperidine, 4-(piperidin-4-yl)morpholine, 4,4′-bipiperidine, pyrrolidin-3-amine, 2,6-dimethylmorpholine, morpholine, pyrrolidin-2-ylmethanol, trans-2,5-dimethylpyrrolidine, cis-2,5.dimethylpyrrolidine, diphenylamine, 2-nitro-diphenylamine, 4-nitro-diphenylamine, pyrrolidine, 4,4′-bis(dimethylamino)-diphenylamine, 2,4-dinitro-diphenylamine, 4,4′-dimethoxy-diphenylamine, diethylamine, dipropylamine, dibutylamine, dipentylamine, dihexylamine, dioctylamine, didecylamine, didodecylamine, dinonylamine, N-methyl-hexylamine, di-iso-propylamine, N-iso-propyl-tert-butylamine, N-ethyl-tert-butylamine, N-ethyl-butylamine, di-iso-butylamine, iso-butyl-sec-butylamine, di-iso-pentylamine, ethyl-n-dodecylamine, di-tert-amyl-amine, N-methyl-pentylamine, N-methyl-butylamine, N-methyl-tert-butylamine, N-ethyl-iso-propylamine, N-ethyl-propylamine, N-methyl-octylamine, piperidine.

3. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups, according to claim 2, prepared using a Michael addition carried out by dissolving a functionalized bipolymer having a secondary amine end cap in an organic solvent, having a boiling point from 40 to 130° C., the solvent selected from methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, chloroform, benzene, toluene or xylene, or mixtures thereof.

4. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups, according to claim 1, prepared using a Michael reactions carried out using carboxyacrylic derivatives chosen from 2-carboxyethyl acrylate, 3-carboxypropyl acrylate, 4-carboxybutyl acrylate, 2-carboxyethyl methacrylate, 3-carboxypropyl methacrylate and 4-carboxybutyl methacrylate.

5. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups, according to claim 4, where the Michael reaction is performed using a molar ratio of functionalized bipolymer to carboxyacrylic derivative from 1.0:2.0 to 1.0:3.0.

6. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups, according to claim 5, where the Michael reaction is carried out adding the acrylic derivative under reagent starving conditions at a mass flow rate between 1 and 50 g.Math.min.sup.−1.

7. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups, according to claim 6, where the Michael reaction is conducted at a temperature of from about 50 to about 120° C.

8. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups, according to claim 7, where the Michael reaction for a period of from 2 hours to 8 hours.

9. PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups, according to claim 8, wherein once the reaction is complete the solvent is removed at a temperature from 80 to 130° C.

10. A dehydrating agent for crude oils, comprising at least one of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric end groups according to claim 1, dissolved in an organic solvent.

11. The dehydrating agent for crude oils according to claim 10, where the organic solvent is selected from dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, chloroform, benzene, toluene, xylene, or mixtures thereof.

12. The dehydrating agent for crude oils according to claim 10, wherein the bipolymer is present in a concentration from 10 to 50 wt %.

13. A method of using the dehydrating agent according to claim 10, comprising the step of dosing the dehydrating agent at a concentration from 10 to 2,000 ppm.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIGS. 1 to 7 display the performance as demulsifying agents of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers without functionalization, functionalized with a secondary amine, and with different amphoteric endings dosed at 1500, 1000, 500, and 250 ppm in an extra-heavy crude oil of 7.55° API (Kawil-1).

(2) FIG. 1 discloses the performance of triblock polymers as demulsifying agents biopolymers. Triblock polymers without functionalization (CSF), functionalized triblock bipolymers with secondary amine—diethanolamine—(C-DEA), and the amphoteric triblock bipolymers, functionalized with acrylic acid (C-AA), methacrylic acid (C-AMA), and with 2-carboxyethyl acrylate (C-2CEA), tested in an extra-heavy crude oil of 7.55° API (Kawil-1), at a dosage of 1500 ppm. The compounds were compared with the FDH-1 commercial formulation and with the crude oil without treatment (blank).

(3) FIG. 2 discloses the performance as demulsifying agents of the CSF, C-DEA, C-AA, C-AMA, and C-2CEA bipolymers, and the FDH-1 commercial formulation, tested in an extra-heavy crude oil of 7.55° API (Kawil-1), at a dosage of 1000 ppm. The performance of the products was contrasted with the behavior of the crude oil without chemical treatment (blank).

(4) FIG. 3 discloses the performance as demulsifying agents of the CSF, C-DEA, C-AA, C-AMA, and C-2CEA bipolymers, and the FDH-1 commercial formulation, tested in an extra-heavy crude oil of 7.55° API (Kawil-1), at a dosage of 500 ppm. The performance of the products was compared with the behavior of the crude oil without chemical treatment (blank).

(5) FIG. 4 discloses the performance as demulsifying agents of the CSF, C-DEA, C-AA, C-AMA, and C-2CEA bipolymers and the FDH-1 commercial formulation, tested in an extra-heavy crude oil of 7.55° API (Kawil-1), at a dosage of 250 ppm. The performance of the products was contrasted with the behavior of the crude oil without chemical treatment (blank).

(6) FIG. 5 discloses the performance as demulsifying agents of the CSF, C-DEA, C-AA, C-AMA, and C-2CEA bipolymers, and the FDH-1 commercial formulation, tested in a heavy crude oil of 11.23° API (Kawil-2), at a dosage of 1500 ppm. The performance of the products was compared with the behavior of the crude oil without chemical treatment (blank).

(7) FIG. 6 discloses the performance as demulsifying agents of the CSF, C-DEA, C-AA, C-AMA, and C-2CEA bipolymers, and the FDH-1 commercial formulation, tested in a heavy crude oil of 11.23° API (Kawil-2), at a dosage of 1000 ppm. The performance of the products was contrasted with the behavior of the crude oil without chemical treatment (blank).

(8) FIG. 7 discloses the performance as demulsifying agents of the CSF, C-DEA, C-AA, C-AMA, and C-2CEA bipolymers, and the FDH-1 commercial formulation, tested in a heavy crude oil of 11.23° API (Kawil-2), at a dosage of 500 ppm. The performance of the products was compared with the behavior of the crude oil without chemical treatment (blank).

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

(9) Nowadays, petroleum industry faces the problem that commercial demulsifying agents show low efficiencies to remove emulsified water and salts from produced crude oils. This one is very often due to the chemical degradation that demulsifiers suffer as consequence of wells acid stimulations. A technical alternative proposed to solve this problem is the functionalization of the hydroxyl groups at the end of PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers. This chemical modification was performed, firstly, as a functionalization with secondary amines [10] and, subsequently, adding an acrylic derivative with the aim of obtaining an amphoteric compound. These new triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings were evaluated as demulsifying agents of crude oils with API densities between 3 and 40° API, displaying a performance greater than those of a non-functionalized PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymer and a commercial demulsifying formulation. In this way, it has been demonstrated that the water removal efficiency considerably increases when the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers are grafted with amphoteric endings. It should be denoted that bipolymers functionalized with amphoteric groups are also able to induce a homogeneous breakdown of the crude oil and aqueous phases, showing a greater clarifying capacity of the removed water than that of the commercial formulation. Finally, it must be remarked that the new triblock bipolymers grafted with amphoteric endings are resistant to chemical degradation under acid conditions.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(10) The present disclosure relates to the synthesis of PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric ending groups, which have been tested as demulsifying agents in crude oils with API densities within the interval of 3 to 40° API.

(11) The following is a non-limiting example off a procedure for synthesizing triblock biopolymers having amphoteric ending groups. The first step is the preparation of a functionalized triblock biopolymer comprising a secondary amine according to the method described in the U.S. Pat. No. 10,125,226. This patent describes a two-stage synthesis, which is briefly described as follows: Step 1. Preparation of the a,w-dialkylsulfonylester or a,w-diarylsulfonylester of poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w-poly(propylene oxide).sub.y-poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w, wherein an alkyl sulfonyl or aryl sulfonyl chloride is reacted with the poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w-poly(propylene oxide).sub.y-poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w triblock bipolymer. The average molecular mass in number of PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w bipolymer is between the range from 600 to 10,000 g/mol; where the “w” subscript is an integer from 4 to 90; whereas the “y” subscript is is an integer from 6 to 104. Step 2. The nucleophilic substitution reaction was carried out with the α,ω-dialkylsulfonylester or α,ω-diarylsulfonylester and the poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w-poly(propylene oxide).sub.y-polyethylene oxide).sub.w with secondary amines to obtain the functionalized bipolymers Y-PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w-Y (Y=secondary amine).

(12) Once the functionalized bipolymer truncated with secondary amines was synthesized, it was reacted with acrylic acid derivatives via a Michael addition, to obtain a biopolymer having amphoteric end capping units, as shown in scheme (1). In scheme (1) is observed that the nitrogen atom bears a positive formal charge; while the negative formal charge is centered in the oxygen atom of the ester moiety (if R.sub.4=H) or in the terminal oxygen of the radical fragment R.sub.4 (if R.sub.4≠H).

(13) ##STR00001##

(14) The Michael addition was carried out by dissolving the functionalized bipolymer having a secondary amine end cap in an organic solvent, having a boiling point from 40 to 130° C., for example, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, chloroform, benzene, toluene or xylene, or mixtures thereof. The molar ratio of the functionalized bipolymer with secondary amine/acrylic derivative was from 1.0/2.0 to 1.0/3.0. The acrylate derivative was added under starving feed conditions, at a mass flow rate within 1 and 50 g (L.Math.min).sup.−1. The reaction temperature was from 50 to 120° C.; while the reaction time was from 2 to 8 hours, after which the solvent is removed at a temperature from 80 to 130° C.

(15) PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings, having an average molecular number weight were obtained that had a mass of from 600 to 10,000 g/mol. Examples of these biopolymers, are illustrated by the structural formulas (2) and (3).

(16) ##STR00002##

(17) Wherein:

(18) IN=C.sub.2H.sub.4O.sub.2 (ethylene glycollate).

(19) R.sub.1 and R.sub.2=Independent radicals represented by the following groups: —H (hydrogen); —CH.sub.2(CH.sub.2).sub.AB; -CEGJ; —CH.sub.2CHLM; —CH.sub.2(CH.sub.2).sub.QM;

(20) ##STR00003## where A is an integer from 1 to 11, B is —H. EGJ are independent radicals represented by: —H, -methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, sec-butyl, iso-butyl, tert-butyl, n-butyl, phenyl, cyclohexyl, or cyclopentyl. L is a radical represented by methyl and ethyl, and M is a hydroxyl group. Q is an integer from 1 to 5; T is represented by the groups: EGJ and NO.sub.2, Cl, F, Br.

(21) R.sub.3=H (hydrogen), CH.sub.3 (methyl), and methoxide (CH.sub.3OCH2O).

(22) R.sub.4=H (hydrogen), CH.sub.3 (methyl), C.sub.3H.sub.5O.sub.2 (carboxyethyl), C.sub.4H.sub.7O.sub.2 (carboxypropyl) and C.sub.5H.sub.9O.sub.2 (carboxybutyl), C.sub.2H.sub.4O (ethoxy), or C.sub.4H.sub.8O (butoxy),

(23) U is an integer from 1 to 2.

(24) X is oxygen or a nitrogen atom; with the proviso that when X=nitrogen then V is represented by methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, sec-butyl, iso-butyl, tert-butyl, n-butyl, phenyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopentyl or benzyl.

(25) Z represents a mono- or di-substitution at any ring position of 5- or 6-member rings, chosen from methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, iso-propyl, sec-butyl, iso-butyl, tert-butyl, n-butyl, phenyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopentyl, benzyl or hydroxyl.

(26) w is an integer from 4 to 90.

(27) y is an integer from 6 to 104.

(28) Non-limiting examples of monomers suitable for use in preparing the disclosed triblock bipolymers having amphoteric endings include: 2-carboxyethyl acrylate, 3-carboxypropyl acrylate, 4-carboxybutyl acrylate, 2-carboxyethyl methacrylate, 3-carboxypropyl methacrylate, and 4-carboxybutyl methacrylate.

(29) The method consists of adding an effective amount of triblock bipolymer with amphoteric endings to crude oils with API densities from 3 to 40° API, at concentrations within 10 and 2000 ppm, to induce the demulsification of the aforementioned crude oils.

(30) The present invention is described with reference to a specific number of examples, which are considered just as illustrative but not restrictive of the present invention. Once obtained, the triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings were characterized by the following methods:

(31) 1.—Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC), using an Agilent™ model 1100 chromatograph, with PLgel column, and employing tetrahydrofuran (THF) as eluent to calculate the distribution of molecular masses of the polymers and the polydispersity indexes (l).

(32) 2.—Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), using a Thermo Nicolet™ AVATAR 330 spectrometer and the method of film technique with the software OMNIC™ version 7.0.

(33) 3.—.sup.1H and .sup.13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) using a Bruker™ Avance III HD spectrometer, operating at 300 MHz and 75 MHz, respectively, using deuterated chloroform (CDCl.sub.3) as solvent and tetramethyl silane (TMS) as reference. In all cases, 70 mg of polymer were dissolved in 0.5 mL of deuterated chloroform.

EXAMPLES

(34) The following examples help illustrate the spectroscopic characteristics of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings used as demulsifying agents of crude oils with API densities within 3 and 40° API. These should not be considered as limitations of what is claimed hereby.

Synthesis of Triblock PEO.SUB.w.-PPO.SUB.y.-PEO.SUB.w .Bipolymers with Amphoteric Endings

Example 1

(35) 1 g of poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w-polypropylene oxide).sub.y-poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w (PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w) triblock bipolymer bifunctionalized with a secondary amine was placed in a 100 mL reactor and subsequently, dissolved using 50 mL of solvent. Then, a carboxyacrylic derivative was added considering a molar ratio of 2.1 mol of the former per mol of bipolymer functionalized with secondary amine. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 6 hours. Once the reaction time was over, the mixture was filtered and the solvent was evaporated at reduced pressure, obtaining a viscous liquid.

Example 2

(36) 1 g of triblock poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w-poly(propylene oxide).sub.y-poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w (PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w) bipolymer bifunctionalized was dissolved in 50 mL of solvent and placed in a 100 mL reactor equipped with a teflon mechanical stirrer and a temperature-controlled oil bath. A carboxyacrylic derivative was added based on a molar ratio of 3.0 mol of acrylate derivative per mol of the secondary amine functionalized triblock bipolymer The mixture was heated under reflux for 6 hours, after which the mixture was filtered and the solvent removed under reduced pressure to afford the desired product as a viscous liquid.

Example 3

(37) A 50 mL solution containing 1 g of triblock poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w-polypropylene oxide).sub.y-poly(ethylene oxide).sub.w (PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w) bipolymer bifunctionalized with a secondary amine was charged to a 100 mL reactor with a temperature-controlled oil bath and a teflon mechanical stirrer. Afterwards, a carboxyacrylic derivative was added based on a molar ratio of 4.0 mol of carboxyacrylate per mol of triblock bipolymer functionalized with secondary amine. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 6 hours, after which the mixture was filtered and the solvent removed under reduced pressure to afford the desired product as a viscous liquid.

(38) Evaluation of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w Functionalized Triblock Bipolymers as Dehydrating Agents in Crude Oils with API Densities from 3 to 40° API.

(39) Different solutions of each of the synthesized PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings were made at concentrations within 5 to 40 wt %, employing solvents with a boiling point from 35 to 200° C., such as dichloromethane, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, chloroform, benzene, toluene, xylene, naphtha, either individually or as blend, so that small volumes of the dissolution were added, avoiding the influence of the solvent on the water removal of tested crude oil. The PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings were evaluated at concentrations from 100 to 2000 ppm. The triblock bipolymers were evaluated simultaneously, as a comparison, with the FDH-1 commercial dehydrating formulation widely used in the petroleum industry.

(40) In Table 1 summarizes the block polymers of type polyether (basics) that constitute the FDH-1 commercial formulation. It must be highlighted that each polymer confers to the FDH-1 formulation a specific property, either as breaker of the emulsion, coalescer of the water droplets or clarifier of the aqueous phase. In contrast, the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w amphoteric triblock bipolymers are only a single polymer that do not need to be combined, since each single amphoteric triblock bipolymer molecule possesses all the demulsifying properties (breaker, coalescer, and clarifier).

(41) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Components comprising the FDH-1 commercial formulation, including average molecular mass in number (M.sub.n) and PPO/PEO composition (wt %). FDH-1 formulation (M.sub.n) Composition Keyname g .Math. mol.sup.−1 wt % TP 89 7,750 90/10 TP 03 5,330 70/30 TP 14 3,050 60/40 TP 71 1,400 90/10

(42) The evaluation procedure of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w amphoteric triblock bipolymers is a follows: 100 mL of the corresponding crude oil was added in graduated oblong bottles provided with a cover. Then, an aliquot of the respective dissolution of one of the triblock PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w amphoteric triblock bipolymers or the FDH-1 commercial product was dosed. One of the bottles was dosed with an aliquot of xylene, which was labeled as blank. All the bottles were placed in a temperature-controlled water bath at a temperature of 80° C., (t=zero). The readings of removed water of all the bottles was carried out every 5 minutes during the first hour; afterwards, each hour, throughout the evaluation time (5 hours).

(43) The physicochemical characteristics of the employed crude oils in the evaluation of the performance of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w amphoteric triblock bipolymers as dehydrating agents are listed in Table 2, whereas in Table 3 reports the weight distribution of the SARA fractions of the crude oils.

(44) FIGS. 1 to 7 represent non-limiting example of the herein described tests.

(45) In FIG. 1 is observed the performance of the amphoteric triblock bipolymers at a dosage of 1500 ppm in the Kawil-1 crude oil (7.55° API). The C-2CEA, C-AA, and C-AMA amphoteric triblock bipolymers came to removing the 100 vol % of emulsified water. However, the C-2CEA bipolymer exhibited the highest coalescence rate, reaching the aforesaid efficiency at 90 min of the assessment; the C-AA bipolymer reached its maximum efficiency at 240 min and, lastly, the C-AMA bipolymer made it up to the 300 min. It is important to note that the presence of a methyl group in the acrylic derivative provokes a decrease in the performance of the amphoteric bipolymer as coalescer. Concerning the C-DEA bipolymer (functionalized with secondary amine), it also removed the total amount of emulsified water, but up to the 300 min. The bipolymer without functionalization (CFS) came to removing 77 vol % of the emulsified water, while the FDH-1 commercial formulation barely removed 64 vol %. Finally, no water removal was observed in the blank, hereby demonstrating that the water-in-crude oil emulsion was colloidally stable. Therefore, the use of triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings enhances the performance in the water removal, obtaining the best result with 2-carboxyethyl acrylate.

(46) FIG. 2 shows the behavior of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings dosed at 1000 ppm in the Kawil-1 crude oil (7.55° API). The C-2CEA bipolymer proved to be the best demulsifying agent; however, it displayed a low coalescence rate, removing the 100 vol % of water up to the 180 min of the assessment (FIG. 4). The C-AMA and C-DEA bipolymers displayed a good performance as demulsifying agents, removing 95 and 91 vol %, respectively. Regarding the FDH-1 commercial formulation, it reached a maximum efficiency of 67 vol % up to the 90 min, which remained constant throughout the whole evaluation. Finally, the CSF bipolymer withdrew 64 vol % of the emulsified water. It must be noted that the emulsion without demulsifying agent (blank) was stable throughout the evaluation.

(47) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Physicochemical characterization of the crude oils that were submitted to dehydration. Property Kawil-1 Kawil-2 Density (° API)  .sup. 7.55.sup.a 11.23 Salt content (lb .Math. mbb.sup.−1) 42176.sup.b  .sup.  40529 Paraffin content (wt %)  0.91 1.59 Pour temperature (° C.) +24   −33.0 Distilled water (vol %) 78.0 49.8 Water and sediments (vol %) 79.0 45.0 Kinematic viscosity (mm.sup.2/s) @ 25° C. —.sup.c 753.6 Crioscopy MM (g .Math. mol.sup.−1) 1129    534 Osmometry MM (g .Math. mol.sup.−1) 1375    966 .sup.aDry crude oil of 10.80° API. .sup.bOut of method. .sup.cUndetermined by the specified method.

(48) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 SARA analysis of the crude oils that were submitted to dehydration. Fraction Kawil-1 Kawil-2 Saturates (wt %) 20.35 25.02 Aromatics (wt %) 36.17 44.60 Resins (wt %) 26.43 21.01 Asphaltenes (wt %) 16.95 9.26

(49) FIG. 3 displays the performance of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings at a dosage of 500 ppm, in the Kawil-1 crude oil (7.55° API). The C-2CEA and C-AA bipolymers demonstrated to be the most efficient demulsifying agents, removing the total amount of emulsified water at 240 and 300 min, respectively. The FDH-1 commercial formulation disclosed a better performance as demulsifier at this dosage, removing 83 vol % of the emulsified water. Even though the C-AMA bipolymer exhibited a lower coalescence rate than the FDH-1 formulation; however, it displayed a better performance at the end of the evaluation, removing 86 vol %. Concerning C-DEA bipolymer, it reached an efficiency of 82 vol % of removed water. Finally, the bipolymer without functionalization scarcely withdrew 54 vol % of water.

(50) FIG. 4 reports the performance of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings in the Kawil-1 crude oil (7.55° API) at a dosage of 250 ppm. The C-2CEA demulsifying agent was the only bipolymer able to remove the total amount of water, requiring 300 min to do it. The FDH-1 commercial formulation displayed a better performance compared with that at higher dosages, removing 90 vol % of water (FIG. 6). The C-AA bipolymer presented a lower performance than that of the commercial product after 90 min of the evaluation; nonetheless, it achieved to remove 96 vol % at the end of the test. The efficiency of the C-AMA and C-DEA bipolymers diminished compared with their performances at dosed of 500 ppm, barely removing 71 and 62 vol %, respectively. The performance of the non-functionalized bipolymer significantly decreased, reaching an incipient efficiency of 42 vol %.

(51) FIG. 5 exhibits the behavior of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings in the Kawil-2 crude oil (11.23° API) at a dosage of 1500 ppm. The C-2CEA bipolymer showed the highest water removal efficiency, removing 92 vol %. The C-AA bipolymer showed to remove 88 vol % of water, while the C-AMA and C-DEA bipolymers displayed the same water removal efficiency, 82 vol %. The FDH-1 commercial formulation presented a lower efficiency, reaching 70 vol %. Finally, the CSF bipolymer only removed 56 vol % of the emulsified water. It should be highlighted that there was no water removal in the blank, hence, the water-in-crude oil emulsion was colloidally stable.

(52) FIG. 6 reports the performance of the triblock PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w bipolymers with amphoteric endings in the Kawil-2 crude oil (11.23° API) at a dosage of 1000 ppm. The bipolymers displayed a better performance compared with their behavior at a higher dosage (1500 ppm). In this evaluation, the C-2CEA bipolymer removed the total amount of water at the end of the test. 100 vol %, whereas the C-AA bipolymer reached to eliminate 92 vol % of emulsified water. C-DEA bipolymer presented an efficiency of 88 vol %, being slightly greater than the one obtained by C-AMA bipolymer, 86 vol %. The commercial formulation could withdraw 78 vol %, while the bipolymer without functionalization, CSF, barely removed 60 vol % of emulsified water.

(53) FIG. 7 displays the efficiency of the PEO.sub.w-PPO.sub.y-PEO.sub.w triblock bipolymers with amphoteric endings in the Kawil-2 crude oil (11.23° API) at a dosage of 1000 ppm. The major water removal efficiency, 88 vol %, was obtained by the C-2CEA bipolymer. The C-AMA and C-DEA bipolymers displayed the same water removal efficiency, 78 vol %. On the other hand, the FDH-1 commercial formulation scarcely eliminated 66 vol %; whereas the non-functionalized bipolymer, CFS, barely removed 50 vol % of water.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

(54) [1] Industrial Chemical Engineering thesis, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN)—Escuela Superior de Ingenieria Quimica e Industrias Extractivas (ESIQIE), November 2008, pp 2, 20-22, 40-47, “Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of block copolymers for mexican crude oils dehydration”, Arnulfo Hernández Garcia. [2] U.S. Pat. No. 2,425,845, Aug. 19, 1947, “Mixtures of polyoxyalkylene diols and methods of making such mixtures”, Toussaint and Fife. [3] U.S. Pat. No. 3,334,038, Aug. 1, 1967, “Phase separation process”, R. N. Lucas. [4] Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 252 (2005) 79-85, “Effect of EO and PO positions in nonionic surfactants on surfactant properties and demulsification performance”, J. Wu et al. [5] U.S. Pat. No. 8,815,960, Aug. 26, 2014, “Demulsifying and dehydrating formulations for heavy crude oils based on block copolymers bifunctionalized with amines”, G. Cendejas et al. [6] U.S. Pat. No. 9,587,182, Mar. 7, 2017, “Synergistic formulations of functionalized copolymers and ionic liquids for dehydrated and desalted of medium, heavy and extra heavy crude oils”, Flores-Oropeza et al. [7] U.S. Pat. No. 9,650,577, May 16, 2017, “Synergistic formulations of functionalized copolymers and ionic liquids for dehydrated and desalted of medium, heavy and extra heavy crude oils”, Flores-Oropeza et al. [8] U.S. Pat. No. 9,745,521, Aug. 29, 2017, “Dehydrating and desalting compositions of crude oils, using triblock copolymers α,ω-bifunctionalized with amines”, Flores-Oropeza et al. [9] U.S. Pat. No. 9,752,084, Sep. 5, 2017, “Block copolymers, synthesis and application as dehydrating and desalting of heavy crudes.”, Flores-Oropeza et al. [10] U.S. Pat. No. 10,125,226, Nov. 13, 2018, “Scale-up process of bifunctionalized triblock copolymers with secondary and tertiary amines, with application in dewatering and desalting of heavy crude oils.”, Flores-Sandoval et al. [11] U.S. Pat. No. 9,023,785 B2, May 5, 2015, “Gemini surfactants, process of manufacture and use as multifunctional corrosion inhibitor.”, Hernandez-Altamirano et al. [12] CN Patent 2970268, Jun. 16, 2016, “Hydroxysultaine- and sulfobetaine-based geminal zwitterionic liquids, method for obtaining same, and use thereof as wettability modifiers having corrosion inhibiting properties” Hernandez-Altamirano et al.