Synthesis of high silica zeolite via interzeolite transformation without OSDAs

Abstract

Provided is a method for preparing a zeolite having a Si/Al ratio of at least 10 by interzeolite transformation in the absence of an organic structure directing agent. The method is more cost effective and less equipment intensive as it eliminates the costly organic structure directing agent and the waste treatment at the plant.

Claims

1. A method of preparing a zeolite having a silica to alumina ratio of at least 10, which comprises: a. providing a first zeolite comprising BEA or FAU, and b. converting the first zeolite to a second zeolite having a higher framework density than the first zeolite and with the second zeolite having a silica to alumina ratio of at least 10 and comprising a MFI, CHA, STF or MTW zeolite; with the conversion conducted in the absence of an organic structure directing agent (OSDA), with the time for the conversion ranging from about 10 to about 80 hours; the conversion conducted in a solution having a H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2 ratio greater than 50 and a NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio that ranges from 0.25-1.00, and with seed crystals of the second zeolite added to the first zeolite prior to or during the conversion.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the conversion is achieved by hydrothermal synthesis.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the conversion is achieved in a basic solution.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the pH of the basic solution is in the range of from greater than 7 up to 13.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the pH of the basic solution is in the range of from greater than 7 up to 11.

6. The method of claim 2, wherein the temperature of the conversion is above the crystallization temperature of the first zeolite.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the temperature of the conversion is in the range of about 130 to about 160° C.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the silica to alumina ratio of the second zeolite is in the range of from 11 to 25.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the silica to alumina ratio of the second zeolite is at least 40.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the second zeolite comprises ZSM-5, SSZ-35, ZSM-12 or chabazite.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the first zeolite comprises FAU having a silica to alumina ratio of at least 10.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIGS. 1A and 1B show X-Ray diffractograms of the products synthesized from parent BEA (FIG. 1A) and FAU (FIG. 1B) via (a, b) direct, (c) template-assisted and (d) seed-assisted (using MFI seeds (S.sub.1)) transformations. The synthesis was carried out at 423 K, NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.35 (from BEA FIG. 1A) and NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.5 (from FAU FIG. 1B) and H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=65 (from BEA FIG. 1A) and H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95 (from FAU FIG. 1B) (Table 1).

(2) FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D show TEM images of MFI seeds S.sub.1 (FIG. 2A) and MFI seeds S.sub.2 (FIG. 2B) and products synthesized via interzeolite transformations of parent FAU (Si/Al=40) using S.sub.1 MFI seeds (FIG. 3C) and S.sub.2 MFI seeds (FIG. 2D). The synthesis was carried out at 423 K, NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.5, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95 for 40 h with 10% wt. MFI seeds.

(3) FIG. 3 shows X-Ray diffraction patterns of the products synthesized via seed-assisted transformations of parent FAU (Si/Al=40) for synthesis time of (a) 4 h, (b) 8 h, (c) 20 h, (d) 24 h, (e) 29 h, and (f) 40 h. The synthesis was carried out at 423 K, NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.5, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95 with 10% wt. MFI seeds (S.sub.1).

(4) FIGS. 4A-4F show TEM images of the products synthesized via seed-assisted transformations of parent FAU (Si/Al=40) for synthesis time of 0 h (parent FAU) (FIG. 4A), 4 h (FIG. 4B), 8 h (FIG. 4C), 20 h (FIG. 4D), 29 h (FIG. 4E), and 40 h (FIG. 4F).

(5) FIG. 5 shows crystal size distributions of the parent FAU and product MFI (MFI.sub.F-S1), synthesized via seed-assisted transformations of parent FAU (Si/Al=40). The synthesis was carried out at 423 K, NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.5, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95 for 40 h with 10% wt. MFI seeds (S.sub.1).

(6) FIG. 6 shows Ar adsorption and desorption profiles for product MFI (MFI.sub.F-S1) synthesized via seed-assisted transformations of FAU (Si/Al=40). The synthesis was carried out at 423 K, NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.5, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95 for 40 h with 10% wt. MFI seeds (S.sub.1).

(7) FIG. 7 shows X-Ray diffractograms of the products synthesized via transformations of FAU and BEA mixtures in (a) seed-assisted with 50% BEA and seed-free with (b) 50% (c) 10%, and (d) 5% BEA. The synthesis was carried out at 423 K, NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.45, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=80 and 40 h with/without 10% wt. MFI seeds (S.sub.1).

(8) FIG. 8 shows X-Ray diffraction patterns of the products synthesized from transformations of FAU (Si/Al=40) at NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio of (a) 0.50, (b) 0.68, and (c) 0.85 using 10% wt. CHA seeds. The synthesis was carried out at 423 K, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95 for 40 h.

(9) FIG. 9A shows X-Ray diffractograms of the products synthesized via interzeolite transformations of parent FAU (Si/Al=40) with 10% wt. seeds of STF and its corresponding seeds used. FIG. 9B shows X-Ray diffractograms of the products synthesized via interzeolite transformations of parent FAU (Si/Al=40) with 10% wt. seeds of MTW and its corresponding seeds used. The synthesis was carried out at 423 K, NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.68, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95 for 40 h.

(10) FIG. 10 shows X-Ray diffraction patterns of the products synthesized by seed-assisted transformations of FAU (Si/Al=40) at various temperatures in the presence of 10% wt. STF seeds. The synthesis was carried out at NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.5, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95 for 40 h.

(11) FIG. 11 shows X-Ray diffractograms of the products synthesized via seed-assisted transformations of FAU (Si/Al=40) using 10 wt % (a) MFI, (b) CHA, (c) STF and (d) MTW seeds for synthesis time of 10 days. Syntheses were carried out at 423 K, NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.5 (for MFI) and 0.68 (for CHA, STF, and MTW), and H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95.

(12) FIG. 12 shows X-Ray diffractograms of (a) CHA seeds and the products synthesized with 10 wt % CHA seeds from (b) amorphous Si and Al sources and (c) parent FAU. Syntheses were carried out at 423 K, 0.68 NaOH: 1.0 SiO.sub.2: 0.0125 Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 95.0H.sub.2O for 40 h. The solid yield of products was 6% in (b) and 25% in (c).

(13) FIG. 13 is a schematic representation of the proposed mechanism of seed-assisted interzeolite transformations of parent FAU to daughter MFI.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(14) The present method prepares a zeolite having a Si/Al ratio of at least 10. The method comprises providing a first zeolite, e.g., a parent zeolite, and then converting the first zeolite to a second zeolite, or target zeolite, having a higher framework density than the first zeolite, and a Si/Al ratio of at least 10. The Si/Al ratio of the second zeolite obtained upon conversion can be, for example, in the range of from 11-25, or can be 40 or greater. The entire conversion is conducted in the absence of an organic structure directing agent (OSDA).

(15) By the absence of an organic structure directing agent is meant that the synthesis is free of soluble OSDA. The present synthesis need not use an OSDA reagent as in conventional synthesis. Thus there is no soluble OSDA in the synthesis. While seeds of a zeolite can be used, i.e., such seeds being as-made materials, externally added, it has been found that the SDA that may be associated with the seeds is trapped in the interior of the zeolites, and cannot get out of the zeolite to impact the synthesis. In other words, the new zeolite is not nucleated by liberated SDA from the seeds. There is no liberated SDA from the seeds, and the synthesis remains free of soluble SDA.

(16) The conversion is generally conducted in a basic solution under hydrothermal conditions. The temperature used in the conversion process can be above the crystallization temperature of the first zeolite. The pH of the basic solution is greater than 7, and can range up to 11, or even 13. Seed crystals of the second zeolite can aid in the conversion, and are generally added to the first zeolite either prior to or during the conversion.

(17) In one embodiment, the first zeolite comprises BEA or FAU. In one embodiment, the second zeolite comprises ZSM-5, SSZ-35, ZSM-12 or chabazite.

(18) The present invention therefore, provides a method of synthesis of high-silica zeolites, where the Si/Al is at least 10, 11-25, and even at least 40. MFI, CHA, STF and MTW zeolites can be synthesized by the present OSDA-free interzeolite transformation methods. Parent zeolites, e.g., BEA, framework density (FD) 15.3; defined as T atom/nm.sup.3, where T stands for Si or Al atoms in the zeolite framework, or FAU, FD 13.3, can be transformed into target daughter structures such as MFI (FD 18.4), CHA (FD 15.1), STF (FD 16.9) and MTW (FD 18.2) via recrystallization in aqueous NaOH at hydrothermal conditions. Structures with lower framework densities can be successfully transformed into more stable high silica structures with higher framework densities. The framework density (FD) value can be an absolute value or a normalized value on the basis of a theoretical all-silica framework structure. Either can be used as the relative values will be consistent for reflecting higher or lower framework density values.

(19) Concomitant kinetic hurdles can require the presence of a common CBU between parent and target structures or, in their absence, the addition of seeds. The addition of seeds can also secure the desired target structure. A plausible synthesis mechanism, pseudomorphic in nature, for seed-assisted transformations is consistent with the observed effects of the parent Si/Al ratio, the NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio, and the required synthesis temperature and time, as well as with the crystal habit and intracrystal mesoporous voids in the daughter structures. The resulting concepts and strategies provide predictive guidance for synthesizing a broad range of zeolite frameworks in the direction dictated by thermodynamics and with kinetics mediated by either common structural units along the reaction coordinate or by seeds of the target product.

(20) The general requirements for a successful transformation of parent to product zeolite are summarized as follows: (1) the target zeolite should be of higher framework density than the parent zeolite because the ascending framework density scale in the transformations due to thermodynamically-favored high framework density structures, (2) a target zeolite should be added as seed material in the synthesis, when the parent structure and desired product do not share common CBU, (3) the seeds generally would not be required in the presence of common CBU components as long as the synthesis conditions are optimized for the desired zeolite, (4) the use of high-silica parent zeolites is important because Si/Al ratio determine their ability to restructure and form high-silica product zeolites by pseudomorphic transformation approach, and in one embodiment, the FAU zeolite source has a Si/Al greater than 10, (5) the synchronization of the spalling of the seed fragments and restructuring of parent zeolite is required for successful transformations, (6) the NaOH/SiO.sub.2 and Si/Al ratios of the synthesis gel play a key role in such synchronization and should be optimized because the parent or seed zeolites should not dissolve completely prior to their interaction with each other to nucleate the desired structure, and (7) the chemical composition of gel and synthesis conditions should be optimized, further, to get pure and highly crystalline zeolite products. The validity of these requirements is confirmed by the synthesis of high-silica CHA (FD 14.5), STF (FD 17.3) and MTW (FD 19.4) zeolites via interzeolite transformations of FAU (FD 13.3).

(21) In practicing the present method, a balance of the conditions and components can provide improved products. For example, the NaOH content is balanced with the time and temperature used in the synthesis method. In the synthesis, in general, the silica and alumina are contributed by the source zeolite (e.g., FAU) and any seeds. When seeds are used, they can be greater than 5 wt % in the synthesis. The NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio generally ranges from 0.25-1.00, and the H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2 ratio is generally greater than 50. The time for the synthesis in one embodiment ranges from about 10 to about 80 hours, and in one embodiment, the temperature can range from about 130 to about 160° C. The zeolite product made is generally metastable so too much of a given factor can result in a cascade reaction effect where a product with higher framework density than the desired product may result. For example, prolonged heating in some of the reactions can produce mixtures of quartz and mordenite, an aggregately denser product than what may be desired. Thus a balancing is needed to optimize the desired result, which one of ordinary skill in the art can do based on the discussion herein and the examples set for the below.

(22) The following examples are provided for purposes of illustration of the present process, and are not meant to be limiting.

EXAMPLES

(23) Materials used in the examples include fumed SiO.sub.2 (Cab-O-Sil, HS-5, 310 m.sup.2 g.sup.−1), NaOH (99.995%, Sigma Aldrich), FAU (CBV780, Zeolyst, H-FAU, Si/Al=40), FAU (CBV712, Zeolyst, NH.sub.4-FAU, Si/Al=6), BEA (CP811E-75, Zeolyst, H-BEA, Si/Al=37.5), BEA (CP814E, Zeolyst, NH.sub.4-BEA, Si/Al=12.5), and tetrapropylammonium bromide (TPABr, 98%, Sigma Aldrich) were used as received.

(24) Seeds

(25) In a typical synthesis, 649 g of water, 740 g of 1 mol dm.sup.−3 NaOH (Baker Reagent), 98 g of tetrapropylammonium bromide (Kodak Chemicals) were added to 872 g of Ludox AS-30 colloidal SiO.sub.2 (Dupont). The synthesis mixture was then transferred into a Hastelloy-lined stainless steel autoclave (3.8 dm.sup.3), pressure tested and held at 423 K for 4 days in a convection oven under rotation (78 rpm). After 4 days, the autoclave was cooled, and the resulting solid was collected by filtration and washed with deionized water (17.9 MΩ.Math.cm resistivity) until the rinse liquids reached a pH of 7-8. The resulting product was crystalline MFI (confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD)) with Si/Al˜300 (by Inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) analysis) and ˜6μ sized zeolite crystals (by transmission electron microscopy (TEM)). These MFI seeds (S.sub.1) were used in all seed-assisted interzeolite transformations from FAU to MFI unless mentioned otherwise. MFI (S.sub.2) was synthesized by dissolving Al(OH).sub.3 (53% Al.sub.2O.sub.3, Reheis F-2000 dried gel, 0.44 g) in a solution containing deionized H.sub.2O (38 g), tetrapropyl ammonium hydroxide (TPAOH, 40 wt %, Aldrich, 7.5 g) and KOH (1 M solution in deionized H.sub.2O, Fisher, 15 g). Ludox AS-30 colloidal silica (18 g) was added to the solution and the mixture was then transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (Parr, 125 cm.sup.3) and held at 423 K for 3 days under static conditions. The resulting solids were collected by filtration through a fritted disc Buchner filter funnel (Chemglass, 150 ml, F) and washed with deionized water (17.9 MΩ.Math.cm resistivity) until the rinse liquids reached a pH of 8-9 and the sample was heated in convection oven at 373 K overnight. In the present examples, the material used as seeds were prepared using previously described synthesis procedures for CHA.sup.1, STF.sup.2 and MTW.sup.3 zeolites. See, (1) Zones, S. I. U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,763 B2, Aug. 30, 2011, (2) Musilova-Pavlackova, Z., Zones, S. I., Cejka, J. Top. Catal. 2010, 53, 273; (3) Jones, A. J., Zones, S. I., Iglesia, E. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 17787.

Example 1

(26) In a typical synthesis, zeolite BEA or FAU was added (0.5-1.0 g) to an aqueous NaOH solution, into which the MFI seed crystals or structure-directing agents (TPABr) were added to prepare final mixtures with molar compositions listed in Table 1. These mixtures were placed within sealed polypropylene containers (Nalgene, 125 cm.sup.3) and homogenized by vigorous magnetic stirring (400 rpm; IKA RCT Basic) for 1 h at ambient temperature. The mixture was then transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and held at 423 K for 24-40 h under static conditions. The resulting solids were collected by filtration through a fritted disc Buchner filter funnel (Chemglass, 150 ml, F) and washed with deionized water (17.9 MΩ.Math.cm resistivity) until the rinse liquids reached a pH of 8-9. The sample was heated in a convection oven at 373 K overnight. The solid yields of the resulting products were defined as

(27) $\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{Yield}\left(\%\right)=\frac{\mathrm{Product}\left(g\right)}{\mathrm{Parent}\mathrm{zeolite}\left(g\right)+\mathrm{seeds}\left(g\right)}\times 100& \left(1\right)\end{array}$

(28) The samples were then treated in a tube furnace in flowing dry air (1.67 cm.sup.3 g.sup.−1 s.sup.−1) to 773 K at 0.03 K s.sup.−1 and held at this temperature for 3 h. The samples, after treatment, were denoted as MFI.sub.B-D, MFI.sub.B-T, MFI.sub.B-S, when synthesized from BEA, and MFI.sub.F-D, MFI.sub.F-T, MFI.sub.F-S, when synthesized from FAU, in the direct (-D), template-assisted (-T), and seed-assisted (-S) interzeolite transformations, respectively.

(29) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Initial synthesis molar compositions, product phase, yield, and final pH of samples for synthesis of MFI.sup.a. Sample Parent zeolite NaOH/ H2O/ Time Additional Product.sup.d Final Yield.sup.e Name (Si/Al) SiO.sub.2.sup.b SiO.sub.2.sup.b (h) (OSDA/Seed).sup.e (Si/Al) pH (%) MFI.sub.B-D1 BEA(12.5) 0.35 65 24 — Am. — — MFI.sub.B-D2 BEA(37.5) 0.35 65 24 — MFI (22) 11.8 46 MFI.sub.B-T BEA(37.5) 0.35 65 24 TPABr (0.05).sup.f MFI (35) 12.5 47 MFI.sub.B-S BEA(37.5) 0.35 65 24 10% wt. MFI Seeds MFI (23) 11.8 47 MFI.sub.F-D1 FAU(6) 0.50 95 40 — Am. — — MFI.sub.F-D2 FAU(40) 0.50 95 40 — Am. — — MFI.sub.F-T FAU(40) 0.50 95 40 TPABr (0.05).sup.f MFI (33) 12.5 58 MFI.sub.F-S1 FAU(40) 0.50 95 40 10% wt. MFI Seeds MFI (22) 11.8 47 MFI.sub.F-S2 FAU(40) 0.23 95 40 10% wt. MFI Seeds MFI (42) 11.7 76 MFI.sub.F-S3 FAU(40) 0.85 95 40 10% wt. MFI Seeds MFI (11) 12.0 18 .sup.aT = 423K for all the syntheses. .sup.bReported values excludes the SiO.sub.2 amount present in seed materials. .sup.c$\mathrm{Seed}\left(\mathrm{wt}.\%\right)=\frac{\mathrm{Seed}\mathrm{material}\left(g\right)}{\mathrm{Parent}\mathrm{zeolite}\left(g\right)}\times 100$.sup.dAm. = Amorphous .sup.e$\mathrm{yield}\left(\%\right)=\frac{\mathrm{Product}\left(g\right)}{\mathrm{Parent}\mathrm{zeolite}\left(g\right)+\mathrm{seed}\left(g\right)}\times 100$.sup.fValues in parentheses show molar composition of TPABr relative to SiO2 amount of parent zeolite.

Example 2

(30) The synthesis of CHA, STF, and MTW zeolites was achieved by interzeolite transformations of FAU as parent zeolite. FAU (0.5-1.0 g) was added to an aqueous NaOH solution to achieve molar compositions of x NaOH: 1.0 SiO.sub.2: 0.0125 Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 95H.sub.2O (x=0.50, 0.68, 0.85), into which 10% wt. (% wt. based on parent FAU) seed crystals (CHA, STF, or MTW) were added to prepare final mixtures with molar compositions listed in Table 2. These mixtures were placed within sealed polypropylene containers (Nalgene, 125 cm.sup.3) and homogenized by vigorous magnetic stirring (400 rpm; IKA RCT Basic) for 1 h at ambient temperature. These mixtures were then transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and held at the desired crystallization temperature (423, 428, or 433 K) for 40 h under static conditions. The resulting solids were collected by filtration through a fritted disc Buchner filter funnel (Chemglass, 150 ml, F) and washed with deionized water (17.9 MΩ.Math.cm resistivity) until the rinse liquids reached a pH of 7-8. The samples were heated in a convection oven at 373 K overnight. The samples were then treated in tube furnace in flowing dry air (1.67 cm.sup.3 g.sup.−1 s.sup.−1) to 873 K at 0.03 K s.sup.−1 and held at this temperature for 3 h. The resulting samples after treatment were denoted as CHA.sub.F-S, STF.sub.F-S, MTW.sub.F-S, synthesized via interzeolite transformations of FAU using seeds of CHA, STF, and MTW, respectively.

(31) For the synthesis of the H-form of these zeolites, the treated Na-zeolites were added to an aqueous NH.sub.4NO.sub.3 solution with stirring at 353K for 4 h. The process was repeated two more times to recover NH.sub.4-zeolites, which was treated in a tube furnace in flowing dry air (1.67 cm.sup.3 g.sup.−1 s.sup.−1) to 873K at 0.03 K s.sup.−1 for 3 h to form H-zeolite.

(32) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Initial synthesis molar compositions, product phase, yield, and final pH of samples for transformations of FAU using CHA, STF and MTW seeds.sup.a. Sample Parent NaOH/ Temp Seeds.sup.c Product Product Final Yield.sup.e Crystallinity Name (Si/Al) SiO.sub.2.sup.b (K) (10% wt.) Phase.sup.d (Si/Al) pH (%) (%) CHA.sub.F-S1 FAU(40) 0.50 423 CHA CHA + Am. 19 11.8 46 50 CHA.sub.F-S2 FAU(40) 0.68 423 CHA CHA + Am. 11 11.7 25 66 CHA.sub.F-S3 FAU(40) 0.85 423 CHA CHA + MOR 12.2 22 CHA.sub.F-S4 FAU(40) 0.50 428 CHA CHA + Am. 11.9 49 STF.sub.F-S1 FAU(40) 0.50 423 STF STF + Am. 11.8 47 STF.sub.F-S2 FAU(40) 0.50 428 STF STF + Am. 11.8 48 STF.sub.F-S3 FAU(40) 0.50 433 STF STF + MFI 12.0 52 STF.sub.F-S4 FAU(40) 0.68 423 STF STF + AM 11 11.7 26 78 STF.sub.F-S5 FAU(40) 0.85 423 STF STF + MOR 12.0 33 MTW.sub.F-S1 FAU(40) 0.50 423 MTW MTW + Am. 11.9 44 MTW.sub.F-S2 FAU(40) 0.50 428 MTW MTW + Am. 11.8 48 MTW.sub.F-S3 FAU(40) 0.68 423 MTW MTW + Am. 12 12.0 29 60 .sup.aH.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2 = 95 and synthesis time = 40 h for all the syntheses. .sup.bReported values excludes the SiO2 amount present in seed materials. .sup.c$\mathrm{Seed}\left(\mathrm{wt}.\%\right)=\frac{\mathrm{Seed}\mathrm{material}\left(g\right)}{\mathrm{Parent}\mathrm{zeolite}\left(g\right)}\times 100$.sup.dAm. = Amorphous .sup.e$\mathrm{yield}\left(\%\right)=\frac{\mathrm{Product}\left(g\right)}{\mathrm{Parent}\mathrm{zeolite}\left(g\right)+\mathrm{seed}\left(g\right)}\times 100$

Example 3

(33) The identity and phase purity of the product zeolites were demonstrated by powder XRD measurements (Cu Kα radiation λ=0.15418 nm, 40 kV, 40 mA, Bruker D8 Advance). Diffractograms were collected for 2θ values of 5-35° at 0.02° intervals with a 2 s scan time. Si, Al, and Na contents of the samples were measured by ICP-AES (IRIS Intrepid spectrometer; Galbraith Laboratories). TEM images were taken on Philips/FEI Tecnai 12 microscope operated at 120 kV. Before TEM analysis, the samples were suspended in ethanol and dispersed onto ultrathin carbon/holey carbon films supported on 400 mesh Cu grids (Ted Pella Inc.). Argon (Ar) adsorption-desorption measurements of zeolite products were performed on Quantachrome Autosorb-1 at 87 K. Prior to the measurements, all samples were degassed at 623 K for 4 h under vacuum. The final pH values were measured at ambient temperature using an Orion Ross combination electrode (Orion 8103BNUMP) with an Orion Star A215 meter (calibrated using buffer solutions of pH 7.00, 10.01 and 12.00).

Example 4

(34) Parent BEA zeolites with low Si content (Si/Al=12.5) formed only amorphous solids in aqueous NaOH (NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.35, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=65; Table 1) at 423 K under hydrothermal conditions (X-ray diffractogram; FIG. 1A (a), apparently because MFI frameworks preferentially form in gels with high Si/Al contents, because abundant five-membered rings in MFI are disfavored at high Al contents.

(35) MFI crystals readily formed, however, from parent BEA zeolites with lower Al contents (Si/Al=37.5; (X-ray diffractogram; FIG. 1A (b), 46% yield (Eq. 1); Table 1), in aqueous NaOH solution (NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.35, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=65; Table 1) under autogenous pressures at 423 K. Interestingly, this transformation occurred spontaneously, without requiring the presence of any seeds or OSDA. The Si/Al ratio in the MFI product (Si/Al=22; Table 1) was much lower than in the parent BEA (Si/Al=37.5) and the solids yield was 46% (Table 1) suggesting that nearly all of the Al in the parent BEA was incorporated into the product MFI, whereas some SiO.sub.2 remained dissolved in solution. Crystalline MFI was obtained (X-ray diffractograms; FIG. 1A (c) and FIG. 1A (d), 47% yield (Eq. 1) for both, also, from template-assisted (with TPABr) and seed-assisted (with 10% wt. MFI seeds) transformations of parent BEA (Si/Al=37.5). Thus, it can be concluded that parent BEA with high Si content (Si/Al=37.5) transformed to MFI spontaneously and in the individual presence of MFI seeds or OSDA at Si/Al ratios in the parent BEA that favor MFI frameworks.

(36) It is noted that the framework structures and composite building units (CBU) of the parent BEA and product MFI include a common mor structural motif. It seems plausible, therefore, that a CBU, present in BEA and required to form MFI, remains essentially intact within BEA-derived intermediates during the conversion of BEA to MFI. This CBU may assist the local nucleation of MFI and in doing so, minimize inherent kinetic hurdles and allow BEA to MFI transformations to occur without seeds or OSDA. This common CBU serves as a kinetic mediator for nucleating the daughter structure, suggesting that zeolites containing common CBU may be able to overcome kinetic barriers that obstruct their interconversions in the direction dictated by the thermodynamic tendency of zeolites to form structures with greater framework densities. MFI zeolites were obtained after 24 h from parent BEA zeolites (FIG. 1A), while hydrothermal MFI syntheses from amorphous aluminosilicate gels, with or without OSDA, typically require 2-15 days. Thus, the presence of the BEA structure, plausibly because of its common CBU with MFI, shortens synthesis times because of more rapid nucleation.

Example 5

(37) Parent FAU zeolites with Si/Al ratios of 6 and 40 gave only amorphous solids in hydrothermal aqueous NaOH environments (NaOH/SiO.sub.2=0.5, H.sub.2O/SiO.sub.2=95; Table 1) at 423 K (X-ray diffractograms; FIG. 1B (a) and FIG. 1B (b), consistent with kinetic hurdles that cannot be overcome in spite of favorable thermodynamics (FAU, FD 13.3; MFI, FD 18.4), possibly because of the lack of common CBU. MFI formed, however, when FAU (Si/Al=40) was treated in similar hydrothermal environments but with MFI seeds in the synthesis mixture (X-ray diffractograms; FIG. 1B (c) and FIG. 1B (d), 58 and 47% yield (Eq. 1), respectively; Table 1). These results contrast the ability of BEA precursors to form MFI even in the absence of such kinetic mediation. Seeds are required in the case of parent FAU zeolites to assist the nucleation of the favored MFI structures.

(38) FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D show TEM images of two MFI seeds of different crystal size (6 μm; seed S.sub.1; FIG. 2A and 0.2 μm; seed S.sub.2; FIG. 2B) and of the MFI products formed from FAU parent zeolites using each of these seeds (FIGS. 2C and 2D, respectively). The crystal habit and size of the MFI products using S.sub.1 (TEM, FIG. 2C) and S.sub.2 (TEM, FIG. 2D) seeds are similar (˜0.7 μm diameter) and differ markedly from those of the MFI seeds used (TEM, FIGS. 2A and 2B), which do not remain intact as they mediate MFI nucleation from parent FAU crystals. These seeds do not serve as intact nucleation sites, but instead provide CBU or shed small fragments, as in the case of homogeneous nucleation and growth during seed-assisted hydrothermal synthesis from amorphous aluminosilicate gels. The products crystals are in fact smaller (˜0.7 μm crystals, FIG. 2C) than the S.sub.1 seed crystals (˜6 μm crystals, FIG. 2A), making epitaxial growth of MFI crystals onto seeds implausible.

(39) FAU diffraction lines disappeared after synthesis times of 4 h, while MFI lines were detectable at all times (4-40 h; FIGS. 3B-3F). The amorphous background in the diffractograms (FIGS. 3A-3F; 2θ=20-30°) disappeared and the MFI diffraction lines were the only discernible features after 24 h. These data indicate that FAU crystals lose their long-range order in the NaOH media in a time scale that still preserves the identity of MFI seeds, which provide essential components for the ultimate recrystallization of FAU parent structures into MFI. The size and shape of MFI crystals, formed from seed-assisted FAU conversion to MFI, did not change significantly during synthesis (4-40 h; TEM; FIGS. 4B-4F) and resemble those of the parent FAU zeolite (TEM; FIG. 4A). MFI mean crystal sizes are only slightly larger than in the FAU parent zeolites (crystal size histograms; FIG. 5). This is consistent with a seed-assisted growth in which FAU structure swell to form structures without local order and spalled MFI fragments from MFI seeds induce the nucleation of MFI frameworks at their outer surfaces, thus fixing an outer crust that preserves the habit and size of the parent crystals (see FIG. 13).

(40) Such volume-conserving (pseudomorphic) transformations reflect the exclusive contact of seed fragments with the outer surface of locally disrupted, but otherwise intact, FAU domains, which nucleate MFI from the outer to the inner regions of these FAU domains. The pseudomorphic nature of these processes requires the nucleation of voids to account for the increase in framework density inherent in FAU to MFI transformations. The mechanistic hypothesis depicted in FIG. 13 suggest that successful transformations would require the synchronization of the local disruption of the FAU structure and the shedding of nucleating fragments from MFI seeds. The requirement for high-silica FAU parent zeolites to form high-silica MFI products implicates such synchronization.

(41) Ar adsorption and desorption measurements (FIG. 6) of the product (after 40 h), synthesized from transformations of FAU using MFI seeds, show a hysteresis after P/P.sub.o value of 0.4, which is indicative of the presence of mesopores in the sample. No hysteresis was observed in the Ar adsorption-desorption curves of the product if MFI is grown from a reaction with hydrogel components in the typical zeolite synthesis conditions. These Ar adsorption-desorption measurements, therefore, confirm the presence of mesopores in the MFI product, which is, both, interesting and unique because the mesopores are formed by one-pot synthesis and do not require any post-synthesis treatments such as desilication or dealumination, that are typically used to create mesopores. Such mesopores are useful in practice because they decrease the diffusion distances prevalent for intact crystals.

(42) FAU-derived species retain their physical integrity, and incipient nucleation of the target product structures occurs at the outer regions of the parent crystals by spalled subunits or CBU species derived from MFI seeds, which retain the local MFI structure required to assist the transformation of FAU-derived domains into MFI crystals. The space conserving nature of the transformation requires, in turn, the nucleation of mesoscopic voids within the formed MFI crystals because their framework density is higher than that of the parent FAU.

Example 6

(43) BEA to MFI transformations occur spontaneously, without any significant kinetic hindrance, and even in the absence of MFI seeds. In contrast, MFI seeds are useful to convert FAU to MFI to provide the kinetic mediation required in the absence of any common CBU. Thus, it is plausible that BEA and FAU mixtures, without seeds, can transform to MFI by in-situ generation of MFI seeds or by assistance through mor structural units of BEA (common to MFI).

(44) MFI products were obtained in the transformations of 50-50% wt. FAU-BEA mixture with 10% wt. MFI seeds (X-ray diffractogram; FIG. 7 (a)), as expected, and also in the direct transformations (X-ray diffractogram; FIG. (b)), in the absence of MFI seeds. MFI products were obtained, further, from transformations of 90-10 and 95-5% wt. FAU-BEA mixtures without seeds (X-ray diffractograms; FIG. 7(c), (d)), with similar yields (46-48%) as those observed in transformations of BEA or FAU alone (46-47%, Table 1).

(45) This data suggest that BEA can assist in the nucleation of MFI from FAU, either by providing the mor structural unit (common to MFI) or by in-situ generation of MFI seeds from direct transformations of BEA.

(46) These results indicate practical applications of interzeolite transformation protocols as this suggest that expensive seed materials or OSDA are not required as long as a source is present that can generate the desired seeds, in-situ, during the synthesis. In addition, these results are consistent with proposed synthesis guidelines, which suggest that the presence of CBU common with product or product seeds, in the synthesis, help to overcome the kinetic barriers for the synthesis of thermodynamically-favored zeolites, denser than parent structures.

Example 7

(47) FAU (Si/Al=40) converted to amorphous solids in the absence of any seeds (0.5NaOH: 1.0SiO.sub.2: 0.0125Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 95H.sub.2O; Table 1), as described previously in Example 5 (X-ray diffractograms; FIGS. 1A and 1B), indicating the synthesis conditions needs to be optimized to be able to get desired crystalline products. In the absence of such optimization, use of CHA seeds in the synthesis should, however, form CHA products. CHA zeolite (Si/Al=19) formed, indeed, by transformations of parent FAU using 10% wt. CHA seeds at 423 K (0.5NaOH: 1.0SiO.sub.2: 0.0125Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 95H.sub.2O; Table 2) for 40 h of synthesis (X-ray diffractogram; FIG. 8). The synthesis conditions (with CHA seeds) are same as those used for BEA or FAU to MFI transformations. The solid yield of the resulting product was 46% (Table 2), which is almost the same as that of MFI synthesized via seed-assisted transformations of FAU or BEA (46-47%; Table 1). The resulting products, however, seem to contain some amorphous solids indicated by the broad background signal in 20-30 degree 2θ range (FIG. 8), suggesting the improper synchronization of decomposition of CHA seeds and parent FAU, apparently because of the lower Si content of CHA seeds (Si/Al=15) than MFI seeds (Si/Al˜300), which make CHA harder to decompose at the synthesis conditions (Table 2).

(48) CHA products formed, also, for NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio of 0.68 (FIG. 8). The crystallinity of these products (66%; Table 2) was higher than those synthesized at NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio of 0.50 (50%; Table 2) possibly because of the better synchronization of CHA decomposition and restructuring of FAU due to higher NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio of the synthesis gel and in turn, high solution pH, which increase the solubility of parent FAU and CHA seed materials. The solid yields (Table 2), in turn, decreased from 46% to 25% and so the Si/Al ratio of product from 19 to 11 also because of the high synthesis pH, at which Si species prefers to be in solution due to high solubility. The increase in the NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio, further, to 0.85, lead to the formation of MOR phase, as byproduct, along with CHA (FIG. 8), indicating that very high NaOH concentration of the synthesis gel causes rapid nucleation of multiple phases in the solution due to fast dissolution of parent or seed materials, followed by their rapid crystal growth; thus, very high NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratios are undesirable for the formation of pure zeolite phases via these methods. Thus, the synthesis of high-silica CHA (Si/Al=11) was achieved from transformations of FAU with CHA seeds, using the developed synthesis guidelines; there is further scope, however, for optimizing the synthesis parameters to get highly crystalline CHA. Amorphous aluminosilicate gels under similar synthesis conditions (0.68NaOH: 1.0SiO.sub.2: 0.0125 Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 95H.sub.2O) with 10 wt % CHA seeds led to a mixture of CHA and MOR zeolites as products with only 6% yield (Figure S1), confirming that the parent FAU zeolites in these transformations do not dissolve completely and form amorphous aluminosilicate species. The results are shown in FIG. 12.

Example 8

(49) STF and MTW zeolites formed (X-ray diffractograms; FIG. 9) in aqueous NaOH from transformations of parent FAU using STF and MTW seeds, respectively, at 423 K for 40 h of synthesis (0.5NaOH: 1.0SiO.sub.2: 0.0125 Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 95H.sub.2O; Table 2), synthesis conditions same as those used for FAU to MFI transformations. The resulting products, however, had poor crystallinity, indicated by broad background for amorphous solids in the diffractograms (FIGS. 9A and 9B). The NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio of the synthesis gel was, therefore, varied from 0.50-0.85. Results, similar to CHA, were reached for STF and MTW zeolites, where the NaOH/SiO.sub.2 ratio of 0.68 resulted in highest crystallinity of pure desired zeolite phases (X-ray diffractograms; FIGS. 9A and 9B). High silica STF (Si/Al=20) and MTW (Si/Al=30) products formed from transformations of FAU (0.68NaOH: 1.0SiO.sub.2: 0.0125Al.sub.2O.sub.3: 95H.sub.2O; Table 2) with solid yields of 26% and 29%, respectively (Table 2), which are similar to that of CHA formed from FAU at same synthesis conditions (Si/Al=11, 25% yield, Table 2). The crystallinity of STF and MTW samples were 78 and 60% (Table 2), respectively.

(50) The increase in synthesis temperature from 423 K to 428 K, in the transformations of FAU using STF seeds, had no significant effect on the product crystallinity (X-ray diffractogram, FIG. 10), indicated by no detectable change in diffraction line intensities, yields and Si/Al ratio of the resulting products (Table 2) formed after the same synthesis time (40 h). Further increase of synthesis temperature from 428 K to 433 K, however, drove the transformations to more dense zeolite structure, MFI (X-ray diffractogram, FIG. 10); suggesting the products from these transformations are kinetically trapped. The hypothesis of kinetic trapping of products was also verified by increasing the time of synthesis, which should also drive the transformations further to more dense structures. Products from transformations of FAU using MFI, CHA, STF or MTW seeds converted to denser structures as time proceeded and led to mixtures of dense zeolite phases after 10 days of synthesis (X-ray diffraction patterns; FIG. 11). This data confirm that products of the interzeolite transformations are kinetically trapped structures for a certain set of synthesis conditions and that these structures, with time or temperature, will convert to thermodynamically more stable structures (more dense phases). These transformations, taken together, provide evidence for the key role of Si/Al ratio of the parent zeolite to determine their ability to restructure and form high-silica zeolites, of NaOH to SiO.sub.2 ratios of the synthesis gel to ensure the synchronized decomposition of parent and seeds and of temperature and time to kinetically trap the desired structures. Synthesis of high-silica CHA, STF and MTW zeolites support the validity of the synthesis guidelines; further optimizations of the synthesis compositions and conditions are, however, required to form highly crystalline products. We expect that the developed interzeolite transformation protocols for the synthesis of high-silica zeolites can be extended further to zeolites of different frameworks, void environments and framework compositions, based on their framework density and CBU components. This method not only synthesizes zeolites without OSDA, but also forms mesoporous crystals, which are known to improve the accessibility of reactants to the zeolite micropores and thus, have the potential to enhance the turnover rate of reactions and tune the reaction selectivity.

(51) In summary, a method for the synthesis of useful high-silica zeolites such as MFI, CHA, STF, and MTW via OSDA-free interzeolite transformation has been provided. Parent zeolites of low framework densities e.g. FAU or BEA, can be are transformed to daughter zeolites of higher framework densities, e.g., MFI, CHA, STF, and MTW via recrystallization in aqueous NaOH at hydrothermal conditions. Successful transformations require that the kinetic hurdles are overcome while exploiting the thermodynamic tendency of microporous solids to increase their framework density. Transformation of BEA to MFI can occur spontaneously without any significant kinetic and thermodynamic hurdles, while the conversion of FAU to MFI, CHA, STF and MTW required product seeds, suggesting the absence of sufficient kinetic driving forces in these cases. The seed-assisted interzeolite transformations were proposed to be pseudomorphic in nature. Such conversions conserve the volume occupied by the parent crystals and lead to similar size and crystal shape in the product zeolites. The incipient nucleation of the new structures occur at the outer regions of the swollen parent crystals and lead to the nucleation of mesoporosity during transformations due to the space-conserving nature of the pseudomorphic transformations and of the higher density of the daughter frameworks. The successful transformations also seemed to require the synchronization of loosening of parent and spalling of seeds, the absence of which lead to amorphous solids. The synthesis mechanism and developed guidelines enable one to design the synthesis conditions of desired zeolites and would expand the diversity of framework types of zeolites that can be synthesized by these methods.

(52) In particular, the present method allows one to make a stable OSDA-free zeolite having a Si/Al above about 7, and even above 10. While the prior art exemplifies the making of materials with a Si/Al of 6 or less without an SDA in the synthesis, products at higher Si/Al are not stable without a SDA filling the empty spaces in the zeolite product, as there are fewer hydrated cations to do so as the overall aluminum content is dropping. Higher Si/Al products also usually have more 5-rings in structure, which do not like aluminum. To the contrary, the present synthesis allows one to make a stable zeolite having a Si/Al greater than 10 without the use of soluble SDA in the synthesis. For example SSZ-35 can be made SDA-free. Such SSZ-35 is loaded with 5-rings and has a Si/Al close to 25. The present synthesis therefore provides one with a more facile and cost effective method for synthesizing high silica zeolites.

(53) The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the method of the present invention. Since many additional embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims provided hereto.