FUEL COMPOSITION HAVING LOW VAPOUR PRESSURE

Abstract

A liquid fuel composition is provided that is suitable use in a spark ignition engine; the composition comprises a mixture of hydrocarbons and exhibits a vapour pressure of greater than around 25 kPa and below around 50 kPa. The composition provides improvements in fuel 5 economy particularly in hybrid electric vehicles that comprise a gasoline-powered internal combustion engine as part of the powertrain. Methods and uses of the compositions are also provided.

Claims

1. A liquid fuel composition suitable for use in a spark ignition engine, the composition comprising a mixture of hydrocarbons and wherein the composition exhibits a vapour pressure of greater than around 25 kPa and below around 50 kPa.

2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the fuel composition exhibits a vapour pressure of below 45.0 kPa, suitably below 42.5 kPa, or optionally below 40.0 kPa.

3. The composition of claim 1 wherein the fuel composition is a gasoline.

4. A method of operating a spark ignition internal combustion engine comprising operating the internal combustion engine using a liquid fuel composition comprising a mixture of hydrocarbons and wherein the composition exhibits a vapour pressure of greater than around 25 kPa and below around 50 kPa.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the spark ignition internal combustion engine is comprised within the powertrain of a hybrid electric vehicle.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the hybrid electric vehicle is a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein the fuel composition exhibits a vapour pressure of below 45.0 kPa.

8. (canceled)

9. (canceled)

10. A method of improving fuel consumption in a hybrid electric vehicle or a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle containing an internal combustion engine within the powertrain, comprising providing to said internal combustion engine a liquid fuel composition comprising a mixture of hydrocarbons and wherein the composition exhibits a vapour pressure of greater than around 25 kPa and below around 50 kPa and operating said fuelled vehicle.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the fuel composition exhibits a vapour pressure of below 45.0 kPa.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the fuel composition exhibits a vapour pressure of below 42.5 kPa.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the fuel composition exhibits a vapour pressure of below 40.0 kPa.

14. The method of claim 10, wherein the fuel composition is a gasoline.

Description

DRAWINGS

[0012] Embodiments of the invention are illustrated by the accompanying drawings in which FIG. 1 shows a bar chart that provides the results of a comparative test for fuel consumption at three running speeds between two fuels (fuels A and B) performed in a conventional ICE equipped car;

[0013] FIG. 2 shows a bar chart that provides the results of a comparative test for fuel consumption at three running speeds between two fuels (fuels A and B) performed in a PHEV equipped car.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0014] The present invention provides for a modified fuel composition for PHEVs and HEVs that comprises fewer volatile components, thus exhibiting a lower vapour pressure, than currently specified for conventional spark ignition ICE vehicles. The term “comprises” as used herein is intended to indicate that as a minimum the recited components are included but that other components that are not specified may also be included as well.

[0015] Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the inventors' findings may be result from the fact that lighter more volatile components of gasoline fuels are less critical to cold starting performance in HEVs because electrical energy may be used to assist vaporisation of the fuel for the initial ICE start. Indeed, for PHEVs where considerable proportion of journeys are expected to be completed using electric power only, the residence time for fuels in the tank may be extended, resulting in some losses in ‘light ends’. By reducing the volatiles content of a fuel, the present invention provides a considerable economic saving as fuel formulations for HEV and PHEVs do not require the more expensive light end components. This also allows for better utilisation of hydrocarbon resources where valuable lighter volatile components may be diverted away from fuel use and towards chemical synthetic processes. In addition, the invention provides for a more compositionally stable fuel composition that does not change considerably in hydrocarbon content over time.

[0016] Suitable liquid hydrocarbon fuels of the gasoline boiling range are mixtures of hydrocarbons having a boiling range of from about 25° C. to about 232° C. However, in view of the reduced volatiles content, the fuel compositions of the invention may be expected to display a higher than expected initial boiling point (IBP) than that of a conventionally formulated gasoline blend. In a specific embodiment of the invention, the IBP is at least 30° C., optionally at least 33° C., suitably at least 35° C. In a specific embodiment of the invention the fuel composition the IBP is greater than 38° C.

[0017] The fuel compositions of the invention comprise mixtures of saturated hydrocarbons, olefinic hydrocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons. Preferred are gasoline mixtures having a saturated hydrocarbon content ranging from about 40% to about 80% by volume, suitably in excess of 50% by volume, an olefinic hydrocarbon content from 0% to about 30% by volume and an aromatic hydrocarbon content from about 10% to about 60% by volume. The base fuel is derived from straight run gasoline, polymer gasoline, natural gasoline, dimer and trimerized olefins, synthetically produced aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures, or from catalytically cracked or thermally cracked petroleum stocks, and mixtures of these. The octane level, (RON+MON)/2, will generally be above about 85. Conventional motor fuel bases can be employed in the practice of the present invention. For example, hydrocarbons in the gasoline can be replaced by up to a substantial amount of conventional alcohols or ethers, conventionally known for use in fuels. The base fuels are desirably substantially free of water since water could impede a smooth combustion.

[0018] Normally, the hydrocarbon fuel mixtures to which the invention is applied are substantially lead-free, but may contain minor amounts of blending agents such as methanol, ethanol, ethyl tertiary butyl ether, methyl tertiary butyl ether, tert-amyl methyl ether and the like, at from about 0.1% by volume to about 15% by volume of the base fuel, although larger amounts may be utilized. The fuels can also contain conventional additives including antioxidants such as phenolics, e.g., 2,6-di-tertbutylphenol or phenylenediamines, e.g., N,N′-di-sec-butyl-p-phenylenediamine, dyes, metal deactivators, dehazers such as polyester-type ethoxylated alkylphenol-formaldehyde resins. Corrosion inhibitors, such as a polyhydric alcohol ester of a succinic acid derivative having on at least one of its alpha-carbon atoms an unsubstituted or substituted aliphatic hydrocarbon group having from 20 to 50 carbon atoms, for example, pentaerythritol diester of polyisobutylene-substituted succinic acid, the polyisobutylene group having an average molecular weight of about 950, in an amount from about 1 ppm (parts per million) by weight to about 1000 ppm by weight, may also be present.

[0019] The fuel compositions of the invention are characterised by having lower volatility compared to standard specification fuels, for example fuels that meet the EN228 specification. In other words, the fuels of the invention comprise fewer volatile components and thereby exhibit a lower vapour pressure when compared to conventional standard gasoline fuel mixtures. The acceptable vapour pressure (kPa) of gasolines that meet the EN228 fuel standard falls between 45.0 kPa and 110.0 kPa. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the fuel composition exhibits a vapour pressure of below around 50.0 kPa, suitably below 45.0 kPa, more suitably below 42.5 kPa, and optionally below 40.0 kPa. In a specific embodiment of the invention the gasoline has a vapour pressure around 38 kPa. Typically the gasoline of the present invention has a vapour pressure than does not fall below around 25 kPa suitably not below 27.5 kPa, more suitably at least 30 kPa, optionally at least 32.5 kPa, more optionally at least 35 kPa. The term “around” when applied to a given value is understood to encompass variations within a reasonable margin of error or to the extent that values either side of the stated value that demonstrate a high level of functional equivalence are also included.

[0020] An advantage of the present invention is that the requirement to utilise less volatile components in the fuel blend means that the isoparaffin content may be increased above a level normally associated with gasoline compositions. In a specific embodiment of the invention the isoparaffin content may be in excess of 35% by volume, suitably greater than 40% volume, and optionally more than 42% by volume, wherein the volume relates to the total volume of the fuel composition. By increasing the utilisation of isoparaffins over n-paraffins the gasoline compositions of the invention will also demonstrate higher RON, thereby requiring fewer expensive octane boosting additive components to be added.

[0021] The invention is further described by reference to the following non-limiting example.

Example

[0022] The present Example tests cold starting ability, fuel consumption, power output and acceleration performance in a PHEV compared to a conventional ICE vehicle. The Examples use standard EN 228 compliant gasoline (Comparison—Fuel A) versus a test gasoline composition (Experiment—Fuel B) which has been adjusted to show a lower volatility than standard EN 228 gasoline. The properties of the Comparison and Experiment fuels are set out in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Fuel Properties EN228 Specification Comparison Experiment Min Max Fuel A Fuel B RON — 95 — 96.5 96.1 MON — 85 — 85.4 86.5 Density @ g/cm.sup.3 0.720 0.775 0.7390 0.7523 15° C. IBP ° C. — — 26.0 39.9 FBP ° C. — 210.0 200.9 192.3 E70 % vol 20.0 48.0 33.5 11.8 E100 % vol 46.0 71.0 52.9 45.6 E150 % vol 75.0 — 84.9 88.6 VP kPa 45.0 110.0 94.9 38.3 GC C — — — 6.48 7.03 H — — — 11.64 12.66 O — — — 0.00 0.00 C % m — — 87.00 86.95 H % m — — 13.02 13.05 O % m — 2.7 or 0.00 0.00 3.7 Paraffins % vol — — 12.28 7.73 Isoparaffins % vol — — 33.52 44.30 Olefins % vol — — 15.21 7.87 (incl. dienes) Dienes % vol — — 0.13 0.02 Naphthenes % vol — — 3.07 4.16 Aromatics % vol — — 34.62 34.91 Oxygenates % vol — — 0.00 0.00 Unknowns % vol — — 1.30 1.03 Total % vol — — 100.0 100.0 AFR (stoich) — — — 14.46 14.46 Gr. Ent. Com MJ/kg — — −43.30 −42.89 (g) Vol. Ent. MJ/L — — −31.9987 −32.2661 Com. (g) Gr. Ent. MJ/kg — — −43.000 −43.258 Com. (l) Vol. Ent. MJ/L — — −31.777 −32.543 Com. (l) Heat of MJ/kg — — 0.371 −0.370 vaporisation Cal. H/C — — — 1.796 1.80 ratio Cal. O/C — — — 0.000 0.000 ratio CWF — — — 0.8690 0.8687

[0023] The reference fuel (fuel A) was a standard unleaded gasoline with an octane quality of RON 96.5 that met the current EN228 specification and was similar to a conventional main grade gasoline fuel. This fuel acted as the baseline for comparison. The Experiment fuel (fuel B) represented a “stored” PHEV fuel. It had an adequate octane quality of RON 96.1, but its volatility metrics E70, E100 and VP were below the current EN228 specification.

Vehicles

[0024] A 2008 Toyota Prius 1.5 T4 HEV that was converted by Amberjac™ to have plug-in charging capability was selected for test as a representative PHEV. This was compared to a standard 2004 Volkswagen Golf 1.6 FSI powered by conventional spark ignition, direct fuel injection, internal combustion engine (ICE) technology. The ICEs in both vehicles operated using a four-stroke cycle with variable valve timing.

Cold Start Testing

[0025] The test conditions for cold start are set out in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Cold Start Test Test Definition Warm-up Cruise 30 min 100 km/h Top-1 RLS, tank fuel (Std ULG95 Maingrade) Select Connect test fuel to external Fuel fuel lines Purge Flush 5 litres with test fuel, Cruise 30-mins 100 km/h Top-1 RLS Soak O/night soak at 5° C. in CD5 Fuel to be soaked over-night in cell. Cold-Start Cold-cranking test Record: Vbatt/Time, No. Attempts Max 5 attempts

[0026] Contrary to expectations, Fuel B exhibited no cold-start problems at 5° C. when used in the PHEV engine or the ICE engine.

Performance Assessment

[0027] An important consideration for fuel formulations is the potential for any fuel derived performance benefits or demerits. These are most often determined by operating the vehicle (or engine) at full load during accelerating and/or steady conditions. The conditions for assessing the acceleration performance and also the power are set out in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Performance Testing Test Definition Warm up 100 km/h, road-load, 15 minutes, Tank Fuel Select Fuel Connect test fuel to external fuel lines Purge/Precon Cruise, Drive or Top-1, 90 km/h, road-load, 15 mins 5x WOT Accel in Drive or Top- 1, 50-100 km/h Acceleration Test 5x WOT in Drive Mode or Top-1 30-50 km/h* 50-80 km/h 80-120 km/h Power Test WOT at 50, 80, 120 km/h in D or Top-1 5 s stabilisation, 5 s measurement Pause 60 s idle Repeat twice (three measurements at each step) Record, Power (kW), Tractive Force (N), Speed (km/h dyno)

[0028] The when used in both the ICE and the PHEV Experimental test fuel B resulted in consistently improved fuel consumption across all cruising speeds (see FIGS. 1 and 2). It should be noted that fuel consumption in the PHEV at a speed of 50 kph is indicated as zero because the vehicle was operating solely under electrical power at this speed (see FIG. 2).

[0029] Surprisingly, it was found that fuel B showed more than 1% improvement in fuel consumption at a steady state (120 km/h) compared to the standard comparison fuel (fuel A) when used in the PHEV. This is significant because at this speed the PHEV is operating only using its ICE. Even more surprising was that the reduced fuel consumption in the ICE vehicle at 120 km/h was even higher at just under 3% (see FIG. 1).

[0030] The following tables outline the results for cold start new European driving cycle (NEDC) and warm start steady state at 120 km/h alongside a notional prediction based upon the common general knowledge before the tests were run.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Fuel consumption compared to Comp. fuel PHEV ICE Prediction No change No change Result NEDC Better by 4.4% Better by 2.4% Result 120 km/h Better by 1.2% Better by 2.8%

[0031] The results show that using a low vapour pressure fuel was no disadvantage to either vehicle and showed some benefits to fuel economy. Hence, the invention provides for utilisation of fuels having vapour pressures lower than specified in established international standards (for instance EN228) in ICEs in general, and more suitably within ICEs comprised within the powertrain of a hybrid electric vehicle.

[0032] Although particular embodiments of the invention have been disclosed herein in detail, this has been done by way of example and for the purposes of illustration only. The aforementioned embodiments are not intended to be limiting with respect to the scope of the appended claims. It is contemplated by the inventors that various substitutions, alterations, and modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.