LIQUEFACTION PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SUBCOOLED LNG
20170307290 · 2017-10-26
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F25J1/0257
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2240/30
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J1/0042
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J1/0244
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J1/0022
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2215/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2220/62
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2210/42
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F25J1/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A variable speed liquid LNG expander (X1) and a variable speed two-phase LNG expander (X2) in line, downstream from X1. The rotational speed of both expanders can be controlled and changed independent from each other. The speed of expander X1 and expander X2 is determined in such way that the amount of liquid LNG downstream from the PHS compared to the feed gas supply is maximized and the amount of vapor and boil-off downstream of X2 is minimized.
Claims
1. A system for producing optimum sub-cooling of LNG to reduce boil-off losses at a liquefaction plant that produces LNG, the system comprising: A source of substantially nitrogen-free LNG; A nitrogen injector for Injecting nitrogen into pressurized natural gas at the liquefaction plant as a first step in sub-cooling the substantially nitrogen-free LNG, thereby producing a nitrogen-rich feed gas supply; A main heat exchanger for liquefying the nitrogen-rich feed gas supply to form nitrogen-rich, pressurized condensed LNG; A single-phase liquid expander contained within an initial surrounding vessel under inlet temperature, inlet pressure and inlet mass flow receiving the nitrogen-rich pressurized condensed LNG the single-phase expander having an adjustable rotational speed such that setting a rotational speed of the single-phase expander expands the LNG to outlet pressure, the single-phase expander operable to process the nitrogen-rich pressurized condensed LNG; A two-phase liquid expander contained within a second surrounding vessel operating in series with the single-phase expander to decrease boil-off gas and optimize a ratio between liquid LNG and vapor LNG, the two-phase expander having an adjustable rotational speed, wherein the two-phase expander is operable to process the nitrogen-rich pressurized condensed LNG received from the single-phase expander and separate the nitrogen from the LNG by evaporation of the nitrogen, the system optimized to produce subcooled liquid LNG to reduce boil-off losses.
2. A system for optimum sub-cooling of LNG to reduce boil-off losses at a liquefaction plant that produces LNG, the system comprising: A source of substantially nitrogen-free LNG A nitrogen injector for injecting nitrogen into pressurized natural gas at the liquefaction plant as a first step in sub-cooling the substantially nitrogen-free LNG to produce a nitrogen-rich feed gas supply; A main heat exchanger (MHE)\for liquefying the nitrogen-rich feed gas supply to form nitrogen-rich, pressurized condensed LNG; A single-phase liquid expander (X1) contained within an initial surrounding vessel under inlet temperature (T1), inlet pressure (P1) and mass flow (M1), X1 receiving the nitrogen-rich, pressurized condensed LNG, X1 further having an adjustable rotational speed such that setting a rotational speed of X1 expands the LNG to an outlet pressure (P2), X1 operable to process the nitrogen-rich pressurized condensed LNG; A two-phase liquid expander (X2) contained within a second surrounding vessel and operating in series with the single-phase expander to decrease boil-off gas and optimize a ratio between liquid LNG (LLNG) and vapor LNG (VLNG), X2 having an adjustable rotational speed, X2 operable to remove nitrogen from the LLNG by evaporation, thus subcooling the liquid LNG, whereby the process is optimized by either maximizing one of the following values:
V1=(T1−T3)/(M1−M3);
V2=M3/M1;
V3=(T1−T3)M3/M1;
V5=(T1−T3)×(M3−M4);
V6=(T1−T3)×M3−(T1−T4)×M4;
V7=(T1−T3)×M3/((T1−T4)×M4); or minimizing the following value V4:
V4=M1−M3; with temperature T1 at the inlet to X1, temperature T3 of the liquid outlet of a phase separator (PHS), temperature T4 of the vapor leaving the PHS, mass flow M1 into X1, liquid mass flow M3 out of the PHS, vapor mass flow M4 out of the PHS and pressure P3 at a liquid LNG outlet, thereby reducing boil-off losses while producing LLNG at temperature T3.
3. A method for producing optimum sub-cooling of LNG to reduce boil-off losses at a liquefaction plant that produces LNG, the method comprising the following steps: providing a source of substantially nitrogen-free LNG; injecting nitrogen into pressurized natural gas at the liquefaction plant as a first step in subcooling the substantially nitrogen-free LNG, thereby producing a nitrogen-rich feed gas supply; liquefying the nitrogen-rich feed gas supply with a main heat exchanger to form nitrogen-rich pressurized condensed LNG; introducing the nitrogen-rich pressurized condensed LNG to a single-phase liquid expander within an initial surrounding vessel; setting a rotational speed of the single-phase expander to expand the LNG to outlet pressure; operating the single-phase expander to process the nitrogen-rich pressurized condensed LNG; setting a rotational speed of a two-phase liquid expander contained within a second surrounding vessel operating in series with the single-phase expander to decrease boil-off gas; operating the two-phase expander to process the LNG received from the single-phase expander; and separating the nitrogen from the LNG by evaporation of the nitrogen to reduce boil-off losses.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE VARIOUS EMBODIMENTS
[0030] The description that follows is presented to enable one skilled in the art to make and use the present invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principals discussed below may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, the invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments disclosed, but the invention is to be given the largest possible scope which is consistent with the principals and features described herein.
[0031] It will be understood that while numerous preferred embodiments of the present invention are presented herein, numerous of the individual elements and functional aspects of the embodiments are similar. Therefore, it will be understood that structural elements of the numerous apparatus disclosed herein having similar or identical function may have like reference numerals associated therewith.
[0032]
[0033] To comply with the differences in the performance of single-phase and two-phase LNG expanders, U.S. Patent Application No. 60/705,800 filed Aug. 6, 2005 entitled “Compact Configuration for Cryogenic Pumps and Turbines” by Madison, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety without limitations, presented an assembly of one single-phase expander X1′ and one two-phase expander X2′ operating in series and mounted together in tandem configuration within one pressure vessel 110.
[0034] It will be understood that while
[0035]
[0036] The pressurized condensed LNG from the main heat exchanger MHE enters the liquid expander X1 under the inlet condition T1 (temperature), P1 (inlet pressure) and M1 (mass flow). The rotational speed of X1 is set to expand the LNG to the outlet pressure P2, which is also the inlet pressure for X2. The rotational speed of X2 is set to optimize the ratio between LNG liquid (LLNG) and vapor (VLNG) under certain conditions. Dependent on the existing process the preferred condition is to produce the most and the coldest LNG. This is achieved through the optimization of a parameter V, where V is one of seven specific ratios of temperature and mass flow rate measured at various locations within the process.
[0037] By optimizing the operation of X1 and X2 for the production of the most and coldest LNG, expressed by the value of V, reduces the energy costs and feed gas consumption of the liquefaction plant. The produced LNG vapor is partially re compressed, used as fuel for the gas turbines, or used as cooling medium in heat exchangers.
[0038] The variable speed liquid expander X1 and the variable speed two-phase expander X2 are in line, whereas X2 is downstream of X1. From the Main Heat Exchanger of a regular liquefaction process the condensed LNG flows into X1, then into X2 and then into the Phase Separator PHS. X1, X2 and PHS are mounted close together to avoid unnecessary losses in the piping system.
[0039] The Phase Separator separates the liquid LNG portion from the vapor LNG portion. The vapor LNG (VLNG) is extracted on top of the PHS and the liquid LNG portion (LLNG) is extracted from the bottom of the PHS.
[0040] At the inlet of X1 are equipment to measure the mass flow M1, the temperature T1 and the pressure P1 of the incoming LNG.
[0041] At the outlet of X1 and the inlet X2 is the equipment to measure the pressure P2.
[0042] At the outlet of the PHS for the liquid portion LLNG but located as close as possible to the LLNG storage are equipment to measure the mass flow M3, the temperature T3 and the pressure P3.
At the outlet of PHS for the vapor portion VLNG is the equipment to measure the mass flow M4 and the temperature T4 of the LNG vapor.
[0043] The operation of X1 and X2 is determined by a central process control. The purpose is to obtain and maintain a maximum liquid temperature difference between T3 (temperature of LLNG) and T1 (temperature of LNG at inlet to X1) while keeping as close to constant the mass flow rates M1, M3, and M4. Therefore, the object is to optimize one of the following values V1, V2, V3, V4, V5, V6, or V7.
V1=(T1−T3)/(M1−M3)>>>search for maximum value
V2=M3/M1>>>search for maximum value
V3=(T1−T3)M3/M1>>>search for maximum value
V4=M1−M3>>>search for minimum value
V5=(T1−T3)×(M3−M4)>>>search for maximum value
V6=(T1−T3)×M3−(T1−T4)×M4>>>search for maximum value
V7=(T1−T3)×M3/((T1−T4)×M4)>>>search for maximum value
[0044] To search for optimum values:
[0045] Step 1: For a certain flow M1 the rotational speed of X1 parameter S is a first chosen and will produce a pressure difference P2−P1. The rotational speed R of X2 is determined by the pressure difference P3−P2.
[0046] Step 2: The corresponding values of M1, M3, M4, T1, T3 and T4 are measured and at least one of the values V1 through V7 is calculated.
[0047] Step 3: Based on the value calculated in Step 2, the parameter S (S=rotational speed of X1) is varied by a small amount, thus the rotational speed R of X2, and measured values M1, M3, M4, T1, T3, and T4 change.
[0048] Then Step 2 and 3 are repeated, The new value of V is compared to the previous value and the speed of X1 is adjusted. By measuring, calculating and comparing values and adjusting speed parameter S results in a more or less optimized value.
[0049] By repeating the steps until the optimum of at least one of the values V1 through V7 is found, the purpose of the invention is achieved: to minimize the feed gas supply by reducing the LNG vaporization and the LNG boil-off downstream the expanders. Reducing the feed gas supply for a given output of liquid LNG extends the lifetime of the gas well.
[0050] For every change of the composition, temperature and pressure of the LNG this procedure has to be repeated, because the optimum performance of the two-phase expander depends on these values and any change in the plant condition will effect the optimization. A frequent or continuous search for the optimum is proposed.
[0051] The maximum design pressure for X1 is greater than the maximum pressure difference (P2−P1), and for a preferred embodiment the maximum design pressure difference is approximately (P2−P1)+0.5×(P4−P2).
[0052] P4 is the outlet pressure at X2.
[0053] In another embodiment and in addition to the maximum design pressure for X1 as described above, the maximum design pressure for X2 is greater than the maximum pressure difference (P4−P2). These embodiments allow the operation of X1 and X2 in such a manner that one expander is expanding a higher pressure difference than the other. In any operational case the total pressure difference will not exceed the difference (P4−P1).
[0054] Extension of Lifetime of Gas Well Vs. Increase in Production of Gas Well
[0055] As described above, the present invention can extend the lifetime of gas wells by decreasing boil-off gas, essentially requiring less gas from the well to maintain the same level of production. Additionally, the present invention is a method to increase production from the gas well. Thus, essentially the same amount of feed gas from the well produces more liquid output. The same methodology can be used to either extend the lifetime of the gas well or used to increase production from the gas well, depending upon plant economics or other plant operating policy.
[0056] Both increasing the life time for a given output and increasing production for a given input are analog goals in the present invention. The proposed method reduces the temperature of the produced LNG. Causing this reduction in temperature has the following benefit: Downstream of the expander and phase separator the LNG can be transferred to other locations and stored either in fixed storage tanks or in mobile tanker ships.
[0057] During these transfer and storage operations, heat from the environment is conducted to the LNG and warms up the LNG, thus vaporizing a volume of LNG. This vaporized LNG, also named boil-off, is usually lost and has to be re-supplied by the feed gas. The amount of heat supplied by the environment is directly related to the volume of LNG vaporized by the heat.
[0058] Thus, reducing the boil-off of liquid LNG downstream of the expander and phase separator reduces the feed gas supply rate requirement for a given LNG output and extends the life time of the well. However, reducing the boil-off of liquid LNG downstream of the expander and phase separator for a given feed gas supply rate increase results in an increase in production. It will be understood that a balancing of these outcomes can be achieved in order to optimize the plant economics. Driving the system in one direction or another will depend upon the goals set by the operating engineers, design engineers and plant management.
[0059] As mentioned above and best shown in
[0060] As best shown in
CONCLUSION
[0061] Installation and use of a variable speed two-phase LNG expanders in combination with variable speed single-phase LNG expander in conjunction with the above described optimization method, presents the most advantageous solution for improving existing and new liquefaction plants, reducing the overall feed gas supply by reducing the overall energy consumption and extending the lifetime of gas wells. With its short payback time of less than six months LNG expanders are economical solutions for existing and new liquefaction plants.
[0062] Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are now described. All publications and patent documents referenced in the present invention are incorporated herein by reference.
[0063] While the principles of the invention have been made clear in illustrative embodiments, there will be immediately obvious to those skilled in the art many modifications of structure, arrangement, proportions, the elements, materials, and components used in the practice of the invention, and otherwise, which are particularly adapted to specific environments and operative requirements without departing from those principles. The appended claims are intended to cover and embrace any and all such modifications, with the limits only of the true purview, spirit and scope of the invention.