METHODS FOR FINISHING EXTRUDED TITANIUM PRODUCTS

Abstract

The present disclosure relates to methods of finishing extruded titanium alloy workpieces by generating an extruded near net shape workpiece, cooling the extruded near net shape workpiece to a cooled temperature below the beta transus temperature, and then rolling the extruded near net shape workpiece one or more times at a rolling temperature to yield a final shape workpiece with desired properties.

Claims

1. A method of creating a titanium alloy workpiece comprising: a. heating a cast ingot or wrought billet of a titanium alloy to a temperature above its beta transus temperature to yield a heated workpiece; b. initiating extrusion of the heated workpiece while the heated workpiece is above the beta transus temperature, thereby generating an extruded near net shape workpiece; c. cooling the extruded near net shape workpiece to a cooled temperature below the beta transus temperature; and d. rolling the extruded near net shape workpiece one or more times at one or more rolling temperatures to yield a final shape workpiece, wherein the rolling temperature is below an incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 600° F. (333° C.) of the beta transus temperature.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the titanium alloy is an alpha-beta titanium alloy.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising after the heating step (a), protecting a surface of the heated workpiece with a protectant.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the protectant is a lubricant or parting agent.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein the method further comprises, after the cooling step (c), cleaning the near net shape workpiece prior to the rolling step (d) to remove any protectant.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cooled temperature is within 500° F. (278° C.) of the beta transus temperature.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the cooled temperature is within 100° F. (55.6° C.) of the beta transus temperature.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the cooled temperature is room temperature.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the rolling temperature is above the beta transus temperature and below the incipient melting temperature.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the rolling temperature is above the beta transus temperature and within 50° F. (27.8° C.) of the beta transus temperature.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the rolling temperature is below the beta transus temperature and within 600° F. (333° C.) of the beta transus temperature.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the rolling temperature is below the beta transus temperature and within 50° F. (27.8° C.) of the beta transus temperature.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the rolling step (d) further comprises rolling at a strain rate of from 0.1 s.sup.−1 to 100 s.sup.−1.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the rolling step comprises uniformly reducing the near net shape workpiece by a relative reduction of from 1% to 95%, thereby achieving the final shape workpiece.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the relative reduction is from 40 to 75%.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the rolling step comprises reducing a first section of the near net shape workpiece by a first relative reduction of from 1% to 95%, thereby achieving a final shape workpiece with the first section being reduced.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the rolling step further comprises reducing at least a second section of the near net shape workpiece by a second relative reduction of from 1% to 95% thereby achieving the final shape workpiece with at least the first and second sections being reduced, wherein the first relative reduction is different than the second relative reduction.

18. The method of claim 1, wherein the final shape workpiece realizes at least 3% higher tensile yield strength (L) over a referenced titanium alloy body; wherein the referenced titanium alloy body has the same composition as the final shape workpiece, and is in the same temper as the final shape workpiece.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the final shape workpiece comprises isotropic strength properties, wherein the tensile yield strength in the LT direction is within 10 ksi of the tensile yield strength in the L direction.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein the final shape workpiece realizes an elongation (L) of at least 6% and an elongation (LT) of at least 6%.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0030] FIGS. 1-3 are flow charts illustrating an embodiment of a method of creating a titanium alloy workpiece;

[0031] FIGS. 4A-4C demonstrate a C-channel shaped workpiece created by a method in accordance with the present disclosure;

[0032] FIGS. 5A-5C demonstrate a T-bracket shaped workpiece created by a method in accordance with the present disclosure;

[0033] FIGS. 6A-6C depicts an L-bracket shaped workpiece having a uniform relative reduction and a non-uniform thickness created by a method in accordance with the present disclosure;

[0034] FIGS. 7A-7C depicts an L-bracket shaped workpiece having a non-uniform thickness and a non-uniform relative reduction created by a method in accordance with the present disclosure;

[0035] FIG. 8 demonstrates an embodiment of a roller setup having three sets of rolls;

[0036] FIG. 9 illustrates a microstructural deformation mechanism map for a Ti-6Al-4V alloy;

[0037] FIGS. 10A and 10B are graphs demonstrating a relationship between room temperature strength and ductility as a function of cooling from a beta transus region;

[0038] FIGS. 11A and 11B demonstrate yield strengths between workpieces processed at various strain rates and at temperatures above (11A) and below (11B) a beta transus temperature;

[0039] FIGS. 12A and 12B demonstrate ultimate strengths between workpieces processed at various strain rates and at temperatures above (12A) and below (12B) a beta transus temperature;

[0040] FIGS. 13A and 13B demonstrate material elongations between workpieces processed at various strain rates and at temperatures above (13A) and below (13B) a beta transus temperature;

[0041] FIGS. 14A and 14B demonstrate a reduction of area between workpieces processed at various strain rates and at temperatures above (14A) and below (14B) a beta transus temperature;

[0042] FIG. 15 illustrates micrographs of materials of Example 2 in the extruded and rolled conditions in the longitudinal (L) and long transverse (T) directions; and

[0043] FIG. 16 illustrates fatigue crack propagation rates of materials of Example 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0044] Reference will now be made in detail to the accompanying drawings, which at least assist in illustrating various pertinent embodiments of the new technology provided for by the present disclosure.

[0045] FIGS. 1-3 are flow charts of various embodiments of a method for creating a titanium workpiece in accordance with the present disclosure. The workpiece may be any shape capable of being extruded from a titanium alloy. In some embodiments, for example, the workpiece may be a C-channel bracket, a T bracket, H or I shapes, or an L bracket. The method comprises a first step of heating (10) a titanium alloy above its beta transus temperature to yield a heated workpiece. In some embodiments, the titanium alloy may be an alpha alloy, a beta alloy, or an alpha-beta alloy. In some embodiments, the alpha-beta alloy may be Ti-6Al-4V. In some embodiments, the titanium alloy comprises a cast ingot or a wrought billet.

[0046] In some embodiments, the method may further comprise, after the heating step (10), a protecting step, wherein a surface of the heated workpiece is coated with a protectant to protect the surface from damage that may occur during extrusion. In some embodiments, the protectant may comprise a lubricant (e.g., graphite, glass, a molten salt (e.g., a molten alkaline metal salt)), and/or a parting agent, such as a ceramic material (e.g., a ceramic powder).

[0047] The method further comprises a step of extruding (20) the heated workpiece to yield an extruded near net shape workpiece. In some embodiments, the extruding (20) may comprise direct extrusion. Alternatively, the extruding (20) may comprise indirect extrusion. In some embodiments, the extruding step (20) may comprise extruding the heated workpiece at a temperature above the alloy's beta transus temperature. In other embodiments, the extruding step (20) may comprise initiating extrusion at a temperature above the alloy's beta transus temperature, wherein at least a portion of the extruding step (20) may be performed at a temperature below the alloy's beta transus temperature.

[0048] The method further comprises the step of cooling (30) the near net shape workpiece to a temperature below its beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the cooling step (34) comprises cooling to a temperature within 600° F. (333° C.) of the alloy's beta transus. In some embodiments, the cooling (30) is to a temperature within 500° F. (278° C.) of the alloy's beta transus. In some embodiments, the cooling (30) is to a temperature of within 400° F. (222° C.) of the alloy's beta transus. In some embodiments, the cooling (30) is to a temperature of within 300° F. (167° C.) of the alloy's beta transus. In some embodiments, the cooling (30) is to a temperature of within 200° F. (111° C.) of the alloy's beta transus. In some embodiments, the cooling (30) is to a temperature of within 100° F. (55.6° C.) of the alloy's beta transus. In some embodiments, the cooling (30) is to a temperature of more than 600° F. (333° C.) below the alloy's beta transus. In some embodiments, as seen in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the cooling step (31) may comprise cooling the near net shape workpiece to any temperature below the alloy's beta transus, and in some embodiments the temperature may be room temperature.

[0049] In some embodiments, the method further comprises, after the cooling step, a cleaning/preparing step, wherein the near net shape workpiece is prepared for rolling by removing any residual protectant via the cleaning/preparing step. In some embodiments, the cleaning and/or preparing may comprise sandblasting some or all of the workpiece to remove protectant residue (e.g., residual lubricant or parting agent) and to condition the surface for adherence. Dry powder or wet suspension may be applied to surface. Excess powder or suspension may be removed via mechanical or high velocity air means, leaving a thin layer of protectant.

[0050] Referring back to FIG. 1, the method further comprises one or more rolling steps (40), wherein the rolling comprises rolling the extruded near net shape workpiece one or more times at a rolling temperature to yield a final shape workpiece. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is the same temperature for each of the one or more rolling steps. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature may be different for each of the one or more rolling steps. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below an incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 600° F. (333° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 500° F. (278° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 400° F. (222° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 300° F. (167° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 250° F. (139° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 100° F. (55.6° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 50° F. (27.8° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the beta transus temperature and within 600° F. (333° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the beta transus temperature and within 500° F. (278° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the beta transus temperature and within 400° F. (222° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the beta transus temperature and within 300° F. (167° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the beta transus temperature and within 250° F. (139° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the beta transus temperature and within 100° F. (55.6° C.) of the beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the rolling temperature is a temperature below the beta transus temperature and within 50° F. (27.8° C.) of the beta transus temperature.

[0051] In some embodiments, the one or more rolling steps (40) comprise reducing one or more aspects or portions of the near net shape workpiece to yield a final shape workpiece having a relative reduction of from 1% to 95% in the one or more aspects or portions as compared to the near net shape workpiece. In some embodiments, only one section of the near net shape workpiece may be reduced. In some embodiments, more than one section of the near net shape workpiece may be reduced. In some embodiments, the total relative reduction may be from 1% to 95%. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be not greater than 90% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be not greater than 85% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be not greater than 80% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be not greater than 75% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be not greater than 70% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be not greater than 65% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be at least 1% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be at least 10% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be at least 20% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be at least 30% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be at least 40% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be at least 50% in total relative reduction. In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be at least 55% in total relative reduction.

[0052] In some embodiments, the rolling may further comprise rolling at a strain rate of from 0.1 s.sup.−1 to 100 s.sup.−1. In some embodiments, the strain rate may be a rate of from 1 s.sup.−1 to 100 s.sup.−1. In some embodiments, the strain rate may be a rate of from 1 s.sup.−1 to 50 s.sup.−1. In some embodiments, the strain rate may be a rate of from 1 s.sup.−1 to 10 s.sup.−1.

[0053] In some embodiments, the relative reduction may be uniform, as may be seen in FIGS. 4A-4C, wherein all portions of the final shape workpiece have uniform relative reduction. FIG. 4A depicts an extruded C-channel bracket prior to the one or more rolling steps (40). FIG. 4B depicts the final shape workpiece, having uniform relative reduction as compared to the near net shape workpiece (as seen in FIG. 4C comparing the two shapes).

[0054] In some embodiments, as seen in FIGS. 4A-4C and FIGS. 5A-5C, the relative reduction may be uniform, and an absolute measure of the one or more aspects of the final shape workpiece may be the same across the entire final shape workpiece (e.g., the thickness or volume may be the same throughout the entire final shape workpiece). FIG. 5A depicts an extruded T bracket prior to the one or more rolling steps (40). FIG. 5B depicts the final shape workpiece, having a uniform relative reduction as compared to the near net shape workpiece (as seen in FIG. 5C comparing the two shapes), and also having a uniform absolute measure of thickness throughout all portions of the final shape workpiece as a first section (501) has a same thickness as a thickness of a second section (502).

[0055] In some embodiments, as seen in FIGS. 6A-6C, the relative reduction may be uniform across the final shape workpiece, but the absolute measure of one or more aspects may differ (e.g., a percent of reduction in thickness may be the same across the entire final shape workpiece, but the absolute thickness from portion to portion of the final shape workpiece may be different). FIG. 6A depicts an extruded L bracket prior to the one or more rolling steps (40). FIG. 6B depicts the final shape workpiece, having a uniform relative reduction as compared to the near net shape workpiece (as seen in FIG. 6C comparing the two shapes), but having non-uniform thickness throughout portions of the final shape workpiece as a first section (601) has a different thickness from a second section (602).

[0056] In some embodiments, as seen in FIGS. 7A-7C, the relative reduction and the absolute measure may be non-uniform across the final shape workpiece. FIG. 7A depicts an extruded L bracket prior to the rolling steps (40). FIG. 7B depicts the final shape workpiece, having a non-uniform relative reduction as compared to the near net shape workpiece (as seen in FIG. 7C comparing the two shapes), and having non-uniform thickness throughout portions of the final shape workpiece as a first section (701) has a different thickness from a second section (702).

[0057] Referring back to FIG. 2, the method may further comprise the step of reheating (32) the near net shape workpiece after the cooling step (31), wherein the reheating (32) step comprises heating the extruded near net shape workpiece to a reheated temperature below an incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 600° F. (333° C.) of its beta transus. In some embodiments, the reheated temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 500° F. (278° C.) of its beta transus. In some embodiments, the reheated temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 400° F. (222° C.) of its beta transus. In some embodiments, the reheated temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 300° F. (167° C.) of its beta transus. In some embodiments, the reheated temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 200° F. (111° C.) of its beta transus. In some embodiments, the reheated temperature is a temperature below the incipient melting temperature of the alloy and within 100° F. (55.6° C.) of its beta transus.

[0058] In some embodiments, after each rolling step of the one or more rolling steps (40), the near net shape workpiece may be reheated (32) to allow for a subsequent rolling step to be performed at the reheated temperature. In some embodiments, the near net shape workpiece may be alternatively cooled (31) and re-heated (32) between each rolling step of the one or more rolling steps (40). In some embodiments, all of the one or more rolling steps (40) may comprise a rolling temperature of more than 600° F. (333° C.) below the beta transus, wherein each of the one or more rolling steps (40) may further comprise limiting the relative reduction for each rolling step to prevent cracking or development of internal metallurgical defects in the final shape workpiece. In some embodiments, various adjustments to the time (e.g., longer times) and/or temperature (e.g., hotter temperatures) of the reheating can be adjusted to relieve residual stress, allow dislocation motion, and relaxation of crystallographic texture. This may ensure that adequate ductility is maintained to tolerate deformation at lower temperatures.

[0059] In some embodiments, as seen in FIG. 3, the reheating step (33) may comprise heating the extruded near net shape workpiece to a temperature above its beta transus temperature and below its incipient melting temperature, wherein the reheating step (33) may be followed by one or more rolling steps (41) performed at a temperature above the alloy's beta transus temperature. In some embodiments, the near net shape workpiece may be reheated (33) if its temperature falls below the alloy's beta transus temperature during any given rolling step of the one or more rolling steps (41). In some embodiments, the method further comprises one or more other rolling steps (42), which may be performed below the alloy's beta transus temperature.

Example 1

[0060] Four Ti-6Al-4V samples were produced with an extrusion process and processed through four different manufacturing paths. The material selected had a mill measured beta transus (BT) of approximately 1810° F. (988° C.). There were two temperatures selected for processing: BT+50° F. (28° C.) (1860° F. (1016° C.)) and BT−10° F. (5.6° C.) (1800° F. (982° C.)). The temperature above the beta transus (BT) was limited to 50° F. (28° C.) above the beta transus to limit grain growth during heat up. The temperature below the beta transus was selected as an attempt to maintain product in the work window promising a globularization type conversion to end at 1775° F. (968° C.). Below the 1775° F. (968° C.) temperature the product may still breakdown into a worked structure, but it would be expected that this conversion would be dominated by lamellae kinking.

[0061] The processing speed of the roll reduction was selected as a high and low speed representing strain rates of 10 s.sup.−1 and 2.5 s.sup.−1. Exit speeds of 20-30 inches/second (50.8-76.2 cm/second) in the high speed case, and 5-6 inches/second (12.7-15.2 cm/second) in the low speed case.

[0062] Extrusion samples were heated in a radiant heat furnace that was already pre-heated to the desired temperature. A track was added within the furnace to suspend samples within the furnace and align it with the entry of the rollers. Cold product was loaded onto the track and closed into the furnace for 8 minutes. Calculations showed that product was at temperature within 1-3 minutes, but additional time was used to ensure that furnace had time to homogenize after being opened and give some factor of safety for heating non-uniformity. After 8 minutes the product was pushed with a rigid arm along the track toward the roller setup. Once in the roll bite, the product was pulled through by the spinning wheels. At the end of the channel a guiding structure was placed to both center the product entering the wheels and to prevent the possibility of the advancing arm from being able to reach the wheels.

[0063] The furnace was placed immediately adjacent the rolling device. Product was exposed to ambient air for a distance of 15 inches (38 cm) until the roll bite began. This provided a vehicle for cooling of the product, particularly in the final passes when the product was approaching 0.100 inch (2.54 mm) thick.

[0064] The four pieces were heated and run through four passes where they were reduced in equal increments from an extrusion of 0.205 to 0.100 inch (5.21 to 2.54 mm) thick. Each fin on the product was the same thickness, but could have been different. Following each pass the parts were allowed to fall into a tray to air cool.

[0065] The roller (depicted in FIG. 8) differed from a traditional 2 or 4 high rolling mill. In this case, the rollers were arranged to provide contact pressure on the primary (largest) surfaces of the product and be advanced independently to produce gaps between the different rollers. This type of roller design could be modified to produce channels, H's, L's, T's, and a variety of other structural members. With instances of small rollers and certain shapes, an interference will begin to occur with the bearing housings. Placing the bearing within the wheel and having only a powered sprocket on the side will alleviate much instance of interference. This also produces a more rigid structure for applying load. The use of larger wheels will also provide more space and increase the possible reduction per pass.

[0066] Following processing of the samples, a light anneal was performed on all samples, where the pieces were heated to 1325° F. (718° C.) (+/−25° F. (14° C.)) and held for 1 hour. The parts were then removed and allowed to air cool. This light anneal was primarily aimed at removing most of the built-up dislocations within crystals, and not aimed at changing resulting microstructure.

[0067] In some instances, glass was applied to the sample pieces to evaluate how well it performed as a lubricant or protectant in the rolling process. It was observed to build up in front of the roller until it went through as a large pool. All cases where glass was used experienced these types of defects. In the areas of glass pool indentation, the prior roughness remained as the incompressible liquid filled the surface profile. The same effect could also be seen when excessive amounts of dry lubricants (graphite, molybdenum disulfide, and/or hexagonal boron nitride) were applied to the rollers. In large quantities (vs. thin film) these materials behave like a fluid and can produce similar results as liquid glass. The best surfaces may occur with either light amounts of dry lubricants on the rollers or simply light powdering of titanium dioxide on the piece with no additional roller lubricants.

[0068] A less common method of secondary hot working of alpha/beta titanium alloys is beta processing. In this method, the working occurs above the beta transus temperature. This results in an acicular alpha phase or Widmanstatten microstructure. Lamellar microstructure results in higher fracture toughness, fatigue crack propagation resistance and creep resistance. Minor debits occur in strength, ductility. A major benefit of beta hot working, which includes beta forging and beta extrusion, is a lowered flow stress and improved die or feature fill. The extrusion of titanium is predominantly performed above the beta transition temperature to achieve the increase in formability of titanium in spite of an increase in grain size. The cooling rate from above the beta transus following recrystallization has significant impact on the formation of the Widmanstatten microstructure. During this cooling the alpha grains are formed in platelets/basketweave patterns within the prior beta grains. A faster cooling rate reduces the thickness of grain boundary alpha phase and produces as fine of transformed microstructure within prior grains as possible. This helps preserve later sub-transus hot workability. This also has an impact on room temperature properties as may be seen in FIGS. 10A and 10B. FIGS. 10A and 10B can be found in Sieniawski, J., Ziaja, W., Kubiak, K. and Motyka, M., 2013. Microstructure and mechanical properties of high strength two-phase titanium alloys. Titanium Alloys-Advances in Properties Control, pp. 69-80.

[0069] There exists an optimum cooling rate as the material crosses the beta transus for Ti-6Al-4V. Ideally a 4-9° C. per second cooling rate is desired to achieve the optimum of ductility yet still high strength. Going above 9° C. per second may result in the formation of thinner alpha lamellae and result in higher strength but lower ductility. Cooling faster than 18° C. per second results in the formation of Martensite. This further reduces ductility with a minor increase in strength.

[0070] Above Beta Transus Processing

[0071] Two samples were processed above the beta transus for each reduction pass. The representation of material properties in relation to reduction amount illustrates how properties change through the various passes of rolling. The strength trends for the two samples at various stages in the post extrusion rolling process are given in FIG. 11A. Looking at the yield and ultimate strength plots in FIG. 12A, it is seen that both processing conditions yield strengthening, however the piece with lower strain rate demonstrates significantly higher yield and ultimate strength improvements. Some level of texturing is also observed in the test results. As may be seen in FIGS. 13A and 14A, a general decrease in both elongation and reduction in area was observed in all cases. The slower processed sample demonstrated a significantly lower elongation than the faster processed piece. The performing of work above the recrystallization temperature suggests that the most likely root cause lies in the cooling rate. Examining the microstructure lends some explanation to the observed behavior.

[0072] The microstructure of the as-extruded material is characteristic of what is seen from an extrusion. Standard practice of air cooling on significantly thicker product produces a cooling rate in the 2-7° C. per second and higher levels of ductility from the Widmanstatten microstructure. It typically takes a water quench to achieve Martensite in Ti-6Al-4V for extruded product. The microstructure after the four pass demonstrated a.) larger prior beta grains and b.) partially Martensitic structure versus the unidirectional bundles of the extrusion. Without being limited to any one theory, it could be as a result of the rapid cooling of the thin sections by both radiation and conduction losses to the rollers.

[0073] Conduction cooling effects might explain why the effects are more pronounced in the slower processed pieces where the contact time is longer. The loss of ductility is not desirable in aerospace structures, however this could be managed through warmer rolls, higher set point temperature, improved management of environment leading to and from the roll bite. A heated exit zone would allow slowed cooling during the initial cooling to form the desired microstructure. A mixed (below beta transus and above beta transus processing steps) would likely produce the best combination of properties of beta worked material.

[0074] Below Beta Transus Processing

[0075] When imparting work below the beta transus, texture can arise in the material. Texture is the imparting of directionality within the material, and arises from working in one predominant direction. In the production of strip, which sees large amounts of work in one direction, production is enabled by either using alloys with higher cold workability, such as commercially pure grades, or performing a beta anneal following hot working and between cold working passes to relieve directionality. Following hot rolling of strip prior to annealing, transverse ductility was un-measurable and brittle behavior was observed in transverse directions compared to lateral direction of rolling. Additionally, the presence of anisotropy in titanium increases the susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking in aqueous solutions.

[0076] Contrary to expectation, when evaluating the sub-beta processed pieces little anisotropy was seen in the material's strength. Longitudinal and transverse yield and ultimate properties correlated very strongly, particularly when processed at slow strain rates. As seen in FIGS. 11B and 12B, the samples produced at a slower strain rate exhibited a higher strengthening effect than at the higher temperatures, and material produced through the below beta transus working was nearly isotropic in terms of ultimate strength. In spite of relatively limited texture demonstrated in mechanical testing, there is significant occurrence of grain elongation in the longitudinal direction (see FIG. 13B). The data corresponding to FIGS. 11A-14B is provided in Table 1, below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Data of FIGS. 11A-14B Sample (Speed) RR TYS UTS TYS UTS Elong. Reduction (Direction) (%) ksi ksi MPa MPa (%) of Area (%) Sample A (Fast) (L)   0% 127.7 143.6 880.5 990.1 12% 22% Sample A (Fast) (L) 12.5% 130.9 148.5 902.5 1023.9 10% 19% Sample A (Fast) (L) 26.7% 134.2 150.6 925.3 1038.4 11% 18% Sample A (Fast) (L) 39.7% 136.8 151.3 943.2 1043.2 10% 15% Sample A (Fast) (L) 51.9% 137.4 152.8 947.3 1053.5 10% 16% Sample A (Slow) (L)   0% 127.7 143.6 880.5 990.1 12% 22% Sample A (Slow) (L) 11.1% 131.7 148.0 908.0 1020.4 12% 22% Sample A (Slow) (L) 25.0% 136.6 154.6 941.8 1065.9 10% 13% Sample A (Slow) (L) 34.7% 145.1 157.8 1000.4 1088.0  5% 13% Sample A (Slow) (L) 46.9% 147.6 164.0 1017.7 1130.7  6% 17% Sample A (Fast) (LT)   0% 128.2 146.0 883.9 1006.6 15% 31% Sample A (Fast) (LT) 12.4% 132.5 146.9 913.6 1012.8 10% 22% Sample A (Fast) (LT) 29.2% 132.5 148.5 913.6 1023.9  9% 16% Sample A (Fast) (LT) 41.9% 133.5 146.9 920.5 1012.8 10% 17% Sample A (Fast) (LT) 52.8% 129.4 149.2 892.2 1028.7  6% 16% Sample A (Slow) (LT)   0% 128.2 146.0 883.9 1006.6 15% 31% Sample A (Slow) (LT) 11.6% 132.2 146.9 911.5 1012.8 11% 26% Sample A (Slow) (LT) 25.3% 132.9 150.7 916.3 1039.0  9% 10% Sample A (Slow) (LT) 34.7% 138.9 152.4 957.7 1050.8  5% 19% Sample A (Slow) (LT) 46.7% 144.1 157.0 993.5 1082.5  5% 19% Sample B (Fast) (L)   0% 127.7 143.6 880.5 990.1 12% 22% Sample B (Fast) (L) 11.8% 129.1 143.5 890.1 989.4 11% 21% Sample B (Fast) (L) 30.9% 130.3 145.3 898.4 1001.8 11% 24% Sample B (Fast) (L) 43.4% 132.0 146.8 910.1 1012.2 10% 20% Sample B (Fast) (L) 56.1% 133.3 150.9 919.1 1040.4 10% 25% Sample B (Slow) (L)   0% 127.7 143.6 880.5 990.1 12% 22% Sample B (Slow) (L) 12.2% 135.5 149.8 934.2 1032.8 12% 21% Sample B (Slow) (L) 27.5% 142.9 155.9 985.3 1074.9 10% 21% Sample B (Slow) (L) 38.3% 148.3 159.8 1022.5 1101.8 11% 33% Sample B (Fast) (LT)   0% 128.2 146.0 883.9 1006.6 15% 31% Sample B (Fast) (LT) 12.3% 120.3 141.8 829.4 977.7 16% 32% Sample B (Fast) (LT) 30.5% 133.1 145.4 917.7 1002.5 13% 31% Sample B (Fast) (LT) 42.5% 137.8 149.3 950.1 1029.4 11% 33% Sample B (Fast) (LT) 56.2% 142.1 152.3 979.7 1050.1 13% 29% Sample B (Slow) (LT)   0% 128.2 146.0 883.9 1006.6 15% 31% Sample B (Slow) (LT) 11.1% 134.8 148.9 929.4 1026.6 10% 25% Sample B (Slow) (LT) 26.6% 143.1 154.9 986.6 1068.0  9% 27% Sample B (Slow) (LT) 37.4% 149.0 158.4 1027.3 1092.1  7% 27% * Fast ≈ 20-30 inches/second exit speed; Slow ≈ 5-6 inches/second exit speed ** Sample A rolled at 1860° F. (1016° C.); Sample B rolled at 1800° F. (982° C.)

Example 2

[0077] Several Ti-6Al-4V alloys were extruded as strips (4 inches (10.2 cm) wide) and then rolled to various final thicknesses due to various rolling reductions, which are shown in Table 2, below. Sample 1 was processed to a 55% reduction, Sample 2 was processed to a 65% reduction, and Sample 3 was processed to a 75% reduction. The initial thickness of the extruded strips was 0.3 inch (7.62 mm). The extruding step was performed at 2200° F. (1204° C.). The rolling reduction steps were performed at 1750° F. (954° C.). A light anneal (for stress relief) was performed at 1450° F. (788° C.) for 30 minutes before allowing the samples to air cool. Mechanical properties of the final strips were then tested, the results of which are provided below.

[0078] Strength and elongation properties were measured in accordance with ASTM E8, the results of which are presented in Table 2. All strength values are provided in ksi/(MPa).

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Room Temp. Properties of Example 2 Alloys Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Property (55% RR) (65% RR) (75% RR) TYS (L) 129.1 141.5 137.8 (890.1) (975.6) (950.1) UTS (L) 144.7 155.8 153.3 (997.3) (1074)  (1057)  Elong. (L) 11.5% 11%   12% TYS (LT) 135.3 144.9 145.5 (932.9) (999.1) (1016)  UTS (LT) 148.4 157.0 160.3 (1023)  (1083)  (1105)  Elong. (LT)   11% 11% 12.5%
The sample materials realize significantly higher strength as compared to conventional Ti-6Al-4V products (see, e.g., AMS 4928 and AMS 4911). Further, the materials realize isotropic properties with about 65% rolling reduction, realizing less than 5 ksi strength differential between the L and LT directions.

[0079] Elevated temperature tensile properties were measured for Sample 2 (relative reduction of 65%) at 600° F. (316° C.) in accordance to ASTM E21, the results of which are presented in Table 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Elev. Temp. Properties of Example 2 Alloys Sample 2 Property (65% RR) TYS (L) 92 (634)   UTS (L) 110.2 (759.8) Elong. (L) 14.5% TYS (LT)  92.2 (635)   UTS (L) 106.0 (730.8) Elong. (LT) 12.5%

[0080] Fatigue measurements were performed on Sample 2 (relative reduction of 65%) in accordance to ASTM E466, the results of which are provided in Table 4.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Measurement of Fatigue at Kt = 2.3 (open hole) and 30 Hz for Sample 2 (65% RR) Stress (MPa) Cycles to Failure 410 113,106 200 3,000,000 (discontinued)

[0081] Bearing measurements were performed on Sample 2 (relative reduction of 65%) in accordance to ASTM E238, the results of which are presented in Table 5.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Measurement of Bearing at e/D = 1.5 for Sample 2 (65% RR) Strength Strength Value Measurement ksi/(MPa) Ultimate 242.9 (1675)   Yield 209.3 (1443)  

[0082] Grain elongation in the axial direction, was observed in both high and low strain rate cases. Microstructure taken within the vertical section and viewed in tangential direction demonstrated lengthening in the longitudinal direction of the prior beta grains. As illustrated, the extrusion has a beta worked microstructure, whereas the extruded plus rolled materials have an alpha-beta worked microstructure in accordance with the AMS standards.

[0083] FIG. 16 illustrates fatigue crack propagation rates performed in accordance of ASTM E647, under test conditions of a stress ratio of 0.10, a frequency of 10 Hz, room temperature, and laboratory atmospheric air. The fatigue crack growth results are consistent with AMS standards relative to alpha-beta sheet products.

[0084] While various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and adaptations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.