Space Shaded Constant Beamwidth Transducer

Abstract

A loudspeaker described herein have a radiation pattern which is constant over a wide frequency range without requiring any attenuation. The system includes plurality of drivers not uniformly arranged so that the relative velocity of the speaker follows the Legendre shading function. By making the driver density proportional to the Legendre function SSCBT allows each driver to play at max volume. The purpose behind Space Shaded Constant Beamwidth Transducer (SSCBT) is to replace attenuation with incremental spacing between the drivers. Alternatively, the angles each driver is placed by doubling the distance each driver is placed to accomplish the region which is 3 db lower. When the distance is doubled, the angle between each driver increases the further from 0 it is and is consistent with the Legendre function on its surface.

Claims

1. The Space Shaded Constant-Beamwidth Transducer (SSCBT) system comprising: plurality of drivers not uniformly arranged so that the relative velocity of the speaker follows the Legendre shading function, wherein the driver density is proportional to the Legendre function which SSCBT allows each driver to play at max volume, wherein in SSCBT system the attenuation is not required, and attenuation is replaced with incremental spacing between the drivers.

2. The Space Shaded Constant-Beamwidth Transducer (SSCBT) system of claim 1, wherein the number of drivers over a certain angular region is proportional to the velocity of that region which is equal to be equal to the Legendre function. $\frac{n}{\Delta \theta }\sim \mu \left(\theta \right)={\rho }_v\left(\cos \left(\theta \right)\right)$ Where n is the number of drivers over a range of angles angle Δ⊖ μ(⊖) is the radial velocity distribution ρv(cos(θ)) is the Legendre function of argument x and order v where v>0

3. The Space Shaded Constant-Beamwidth Transducer (SSCBT) system of claim 1, wherein number of drivers in an SSCBT comes out to number of drivers in a CBT multiplied by 0.7084, hence requiring less drivers.

4. The Space Shaded Constant-Beamwidth Transducer (SSCBT) system of claim 1, wherein the space between the drivers drivers can be determined by observing the relative driver density and equating that to the velocity formula for a specific driver in the system.

5. The Space Shaded Constant-Beamwidth Transducer (SSCBT) system of claim 1, wherein the number of drivers in a given area x.sub.1 through x.sub.2 over that area is considered the average driver density in that area, which with the use of g, which is dependent on the total size and total number of drivers of the system, is equal to the average velocity in that region. $\begin{array}{cc}\frac{n.Math.g}{\left(x_2-x_1\right)}=Avg\left(\mu \left(x\right)\right)=\frac{1}{\left(x_2-x_1\right)}{\int }_{x_1}^{x_2}\mu \left(x\right)dx& \end{array}$

6. The method of Space Shaded Constant-Beamwidth Transducer (SSCBT) comprising: plurality of drivers not uniformly arranged so that the relative velocity of the speaker follows the Legendre shading function, wherein the driver density is proportional to the Legendre function which SSCBT allows each driver to play at max volume, wherein in SSCBT system the attenuation is not required, and attenuation is replaced with incremental spacing between the drivers.

7. The non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions which, when executed, cause one or more processors to perform the function of Space Shaded Constant-Beamwidth Transducer (SSCBT) comprising: plurality of drivers not uniformly arranged so that the relative velocity of the speaker follows the Legendre shading function, wherein the driver density proportional to the Legendre function which SSCBT allows each driver to play at max volume, wherein in SSCBT system the attenuation is not required, and attenuation is replaced with incremental spacing between the drivers.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010] In the following drawings like reference numbers are used to refer to like elements. Although the following figures depict various examples, the one or more implementations are not limited to the examples depicted in the figures. All frequency response graphs are in logarithmic form, with 5 db divisions, and were conducted in a room with hard reflective surfaces with exception to the prior art.

[0011] FIG. 1 A graphic of a ground plane reflection SSCBT

[0012] FIG. 2 Side view of the ground plane reflection SSCBT showing the angle as ⊖

[0013] FIG. 3 A more accurate ground plane reflected SSCBT made with mathematical formulas

[0014] FIG. 4 Another prototype SSCBT not using ground plane reflections

[0015] FIG. 5 Frequency response of a ground plane reflected SSCBT on axis

[0016] FIG. 6 Frequency response of a ground plane reflected SSCBT at 45 degrees vertical angle

[0017] FIG. 7 A 48 driver CBT combined measurements in 1/12 octave shading

[0018] FIG. 8 The 4 driver SSCBT combined measurements in 1/12 octave shading

[0019] FIG. 9 A chart showing how to design a CBT with 3 db step approximation

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0020] It is found that number of drivers over a certain angular region is proportional to the velocity of that region which is found to be equal to the Legendre function.

[00001]$\begin{array}{cc}P=\frac{n}{\Delta \theta }\sim \mu \left(\theta \right)={\rho }_v\left(\cos \left(\theta \right)\right)& \mathrm{Equation}1\end{array}$

[0021] Where

[0022] P is the driver density

[0023] n is the number of drivers over a range of angles Δ⊖

[0024] μ(⊖) is the radial velocity distribution

[0025] ρv(cos(θ)) is the Legendre function of argument x and order v where v>0

[0026] Most CBT systems use a third order polynomial approximation. That can also be more easily used for SSCBT. Equation 2:

μ(x)=1+0.0561x−1.3017x.sup.2+0.457x.sup.3

[0027] Where x=⊖/⊖.sub.0 where ⊖.sub.0 is the largest angle used in the array and is typically around 30° in the truncated approximation.

[00002]$\begin{array}{cc}\frac{n.Math.g}{\left(x_2-x_1\right)}=\mathrm{Avg}\left(\mu \left(x\right)\right)=\frac{1}{\left(x_2-x_1\right)}\underset{x_1}{\overset{x_2}{\int }}\mu \left(x\right)dx& \mathrm{Equation}3\end{array}$

[0028] Equates that the number of drivers in a given area x.sub.1 through x.sub.2 as the average number of drivers in that area, which is equivalent to the average velocity in that region where g is an equalizing constant making the formulas equal to each other. It can be simplified so that.

[00003]$\begin{array}{cc}n.Math.g=\underset{\theta 1}{\overset{\theta 2}{\int }}{\rho }_v\left(\cos \theta \right)& \mathrm{Equation}4\end{array}$

which is approximated to

[00004]$\begin{array}{cc}n.Math.g=\frac{x\left(2285x^3-8678x^2+561x+20000\right)}{20000}{.Math.}_{x_1}^{x_2}& \mathrm{Equation}5\end{array}$

[0029] There are multiple ways to solve for g. There are many ways to implement these equations.

[0030] In one implementation the largest edges of the drivers, the edge of the driver with the largest θ or x value, is used as x1 and x2 and set n=1. FIG. 3 shows the result of this implementation

[0031] With the first drivers largest edge at 3.6° or x=0.1141 x1=0 and x2=0.1141. Solving the above equation gives g=0.1141. Continuing on setting the edge of the last driver equal to x1 and solving x2 until the equation can no longer possibly result in n=1 results in the table of drivers below.

TABLE-US-00001 d1 X = 0.114  3.6° d2 X = 0.232 7.29° d3 X = 0.356 11.2° d4 X = 0.495 15.6° d5 X = 0.662 20.8° d6 X = 0.908 28.6°

[0032] The result of this technique yields six drivers. Using the above equations 3 the final driver can be placed at 31.5° attenuated to a velocity of 0.2, since this is so small it is not needed. The number of drivers in an SSCBT comes out to number of drivers in a CBT multiplied by 0.7084, hence requiring less drivers. The total angle 31.5° is divided by 3.6° resulting in 8.75 drivers if CBT were to be used. The total number of SSCBT drivers 6.2 divided by the total number of CBT drivers is equal to 0.7086, very close to 0.7084. In practice fractional drivers are ideally avoided in real world construction. Even Keele's constructions required approximate approaches.

[0033] Further verification of this table of drivers can be done by observing the relative driver density and equating that to the velocity formula. As an example d4 is at x=0.495 and the velocity should be μ(x)=0.764. The distance from d3 and d4 is 0.139 and from d4 and d5 it is 0.167 giving an average of 0.153 the distance from 0 to d1 is 0.1141. 0.1141 divided by 0.153 is 0.745 which is very close to 0.764. Therefore, the space between the drivers drivers can be determined by observing the relative driver density and equating that to the velocity formula for a specific driver in the system.

[00005]$\begin{array}{cc}J\left(n\right)=\frac{P\left(n\right)}{P\left(1\right)}=\frac{2L\left(d1\right)}{L\left(d\left(n-1\right)\right)+L\left(d\left(n+2\right)\right)}=\mu \left(x\right)=\mu \left(\theta \right)& \mathrm{Equation}6\end{array}$

[0034] Where J(n) is the relative driver density of driver n

[0035] P(n) is the driver density of driver n

[0036] L(dn) is the distance to driver n, either in terms of θ or the aforementioned x.

[0037] Equation 6 is appropriate for furthest edge calculations, center to center calculations need to multiply L(d1) by 2.

[0038] In other implementation 4 drivers were used and one of them is at half power so we will set n=3.5 and solve for the average between x=0 and x=1. It can be noted in this approach that.

n.sub.τ.Math.g=0.7084

[0039] In this case g=0.2024 where n.sub.τ=3.5. Furthermore ⊖0=31.5 which is multiplied to the x values to find their angle. In this case the solution is easier to find if it is considered that from the center of the driver to the outer edge of the driver is one half of a driver. From ⊖=0 to ⊖=1.6 n should be equal to 0.5. Considering that the sum of the second half of the first driver and the first half of the second driver is 1 and n=1 for the next iteration of the equation. This technique is used to find the second and third driver and since the fourth driver has half power n=1 for its location as well. If the fourth driver was at full power n would equal 1.5 for the fourth driver with this technique.

[0040] FIGS. 1, 2 and 4 illustrate an SSCBT configuration. FIG. 2 specifically shows the angles each driver is placed by doubling the distance each driver is placed to accomplish the region which is 3 db lower. The distance is doubled based on FIG. 9. The angle between each driver increases the further from 0 it is and is consistent with the Legendre function on its surface.

TABLE-US-00002 0.0307  1.6°  1.6° constructed on target 0.259 8.171°   6° constructed 2° off 0.49 15.63° 13.6° constructed-2° off 0.84  26.5° 29.6° construction 3° off

[0041] The θ calculated shows the valued obtained using above equations and θ measured was obtained by by doubling the distance each driver is placed to accomplish the region which is 3 db lower. The distance is doubled based on FIG. 9.

[0042] Since both a 3.5 driver and 6 driver implementation are used on an array of the same length it is noted that if 6.2 drivers are used in SSCBT the output will be the same as an 8.75 driver CBT; however, if it is desired to reduce the price even further at the cost of output levels but maintain the same frequency loading region that the spacing can be changed with a different implementation of the formula. Or a larger array may be used with the same amount of drivers to decrease the minimum frequency that gains loading advantages. These loading advantages mean a more concentrated beam pattern making the sound reproduction louder within the beam, and that sound will also project farther. It is now known that the minimum effected frequency does not depend on the size or number of drivers in the array, but only on the total size of the array.

[0043] Given the length of the tested ground plane SSCBT we could expect a minimum frequency around 700 hz. FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate the response of the SSCBT depicted in FIG. 2 at various vertical listening angles. We can see that the off axis responses show in FIG. 6 that there is a gradual 5 db decline that begins to occur around 700 hz. Additionally on FIG. 6 we can see the small valleys known as the combing effect on the SSCBT which shows improvement over non-cbt systems. These valleys are 15 db lower than average and are on par with a 48 driver CBT not pictured.

[0044] FIG. 7 is a response graph of the 48 driver CBT45k measured from 0 to 45o with 1/12th octave smoothing. FIG. 8 is a response graph of a 4 driver SSCBT depicted in FIG. 2 measured from 0 to 45o with 1/12th octave smoothing. The results obtained from the 4 driver SSCBT are indistinguishable from the results of the 48 driver CBT45k when considering the drivers used. The 4 driver SSCBT uses drivers which have limited response above 10,000 hz the response above 10,000 hz is indicative of the driver selection rather than SSCBT concepts. This will be an improved array design as it would allow the same result's using less drivers, leading to a more robust and cost effective design. It will also be much more appealing to consumers given that SSCBT has CBT quality while allowing all drivers to play at max volume.