METHOD FOR MODIFYING AN ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE OXIDE SURFACE, USE FOR ELECTRODEPOSITION OF COPPER ON SAID SURFACE
20170298525 · 2017-10-19
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
H01L31/1884
ELECTRICITY
Y02E10/50
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
H01L31/074
ELECTRICITY
C25D5/627
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
H01L31/022466
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method for modifying the surface of a substrate made of electrically conductive metal oxide and notably made of ITO, comprising the following steps consisting in: (i) bringing into contact said surface with a solution containing copper ions (Cu.sup.2+) and ammonia then washing and optionally drying the surface thus obtained; and (ii) bringing into contact the surface obtained following step (i) with a solution containing sodium tetraborohydride then washing and optionally drying the surface of said conductive metal oxide substrate. The present invention relates to the use of such a method within the scope of the metallisation by copper of a conductive metal oxide substrate as well as the surfaces of a modified and metallised conductive metal oxide substrate thus obtained.
Claims
1. Method for modifying the surface of an electrically conductive metal oxide substrate, said method comprising the following steps consisting in: i) bringing into contact the surface of said electrically conductive metal oxide substrate with a solution containing at least one copper ion (Cu.sup.2+) and at least ammonia then washing and optionally drying the surface of said electrically conductive metal oxide substrate thus obtained; ii) bringing into contact the surface of said electrically conductive metal oxide substrate obtained following step (i) with a solution containing sodium tetraborohydride then washing and optionally drying the surface of said electrically conductive metal oxide substrate.
2. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that, during said step (i), the Cu.sup.2+ ion is, in said solution, in the form of a copper salt, advantageously selected from the group consisting of a nitrate, a sulphate, an acetate, a halide, a tetrafluoroborate and any of the hydrated forms thereof.
3. Method according to claim 2, characterised in that said copper salt is present, in said solution, in a quantity comprised between 0.05 and 0.25 mol/L and advantageously between 0.06 and 0.2 mol/L.
4. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that, during said step (i), ammonia is present, in said solution, in a quantity comprised between 1 and 6 mol/L and advantageously between 1.5 and 5 mol/L.
5. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that said step (i) is carried out at a temperature comprised between 10° C. and 30° C., advantageously between 15° C. and 25° C. and, more particularly, at room temperature and generally for 1 min to 1 h, notably for 5 min to 30 min and, in particular, of the order of 15 min.
6. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that, during said step (ii), sodium tetraborohydride is present in a quantity comprised between 0.03 and 0.15 mol/L, advantageously between 0.06 and 0.1 mol/L and, in particular, of the order of 0.08 mol/L.
7. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that said step (ii) is carried out at a temperature comprised between 30° C. and 60° C., advantageously between 35° C. and 50° C. and, more particularly, at a temperature of the order of 40° C. and generally for 1 to 15 min, notably for 2 and 10 min and, in particular, of the order of 5 min.
8. Method for forming a film of copper metal on the surface of an electrically conductive metal oxide substrate, said method comprising the following steps consisting in: a) preparing a surface of an electrically conductive metal oxide substrate modified in accordance with the modification method such as defined in claim 1; b) electrodepositing copper metal on the surface of the modified substrate prepared during said step (a).
9. Method according to claim 8, characterised in that said step (b) implements an electrodeposition bath comprising Cu.sup.2+ ions being in the form of a copper salt.
10. Method according to claim 9, characterised in that said electrodeposition bath is an aqueous acid solution containing Cu.sup.2+ ions.
11. Method according to claim 8, characterised in that the film of copper metal is formed on the surface of the electrically conductive metal oxide substrate according to a predetermined pattern and in that said method comprises: prior to said step (a), steps consisting in depositing on the surface of the electrically conductive metal oxide substrate a layer of photosensitive resin then eliminating, by photolithography, the resin layer at given sites thus creating said pattern and once said step (b) has been carried out, a step consisting in eliminating the remaining photosensitive resin whereby the electrically conductive metal oxide substrate no longer has resin on the surface thereof.
12. Modified surface of an electrically conductive metal oxide substrate capable of being obtained following the modification method such as defined in claim 1.
13. Surface of an electrically conductive metal oxide substrate coated with a film of copper metal optionally according to a predetermined pattern capable of being obtained following the metallisation method such as defined in claim 8.
14. Use of a modified surface of an electrically conductive metal oxide substrate according to claim 12 in the field of photovoltaic cells; liquid crystal screens, plasma screens, touch screens; OLEDs; antistatic deposits as well as optical, reflective coverings, and anti-reflection coatings.
15. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that said electrically conductive metal oxide is ITO.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0099]
[0100]
[0101]
[0102]
[0103]
[0104]
[0105]
[0106]
[0107]
[0108]
[0109]
[0110]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS
[0111] I. Metallisation of the ITO Surface According to the Method of the Invention.
[0112] I.1. Photolithography Step.
[0113] The heterojunction PV cell implemented has on the surface thereof a pyramidal structure (
[0114] The heterojunction PV cell has firstly been protected on the rear face by means of a photosensitive resin (positive resin AZ 4562). A mask stemming from the same photosensitive resin was also applied on the front face by photolithography.
[0115] I.2. Step of Modification of the ITO Surface.
[0116] The heterojunction PV cell photolithographied beforehand is immersed in a bath of Pegactiv A2 (Pegastech), at room temperature, for 15 minutes. This commercially available bath is an alkaline copper solution containing mainly ammonia (<10%), copper sulphate (<10%) and nickel sulphate (<2.5%). This bath was then replaced by other ammoniacal solutions containing only copper sulphate. The concentrations of ammonia used vary from 1.5 mol/L to 5 mol/L and those of CuSO.sub.2.5H.sub.2O vary from 0.06 to 0.2 mol/L. All the solutions used enabled the modification of the ITO with the same efficiency and are stable over time.
[0117] Once the 1.sup.st bath carried out, the heterojunction PV cell is rinsed with deionised water.
[0118] The heterojunction PV cell is next immersed in an aqueous solution containing 0.08 M of sodium tetra borohydride (NaBH.sub.4, Sigma Aldrich ≧96%), at 40° C., for 5 minutes. The surface of the cell goes rapidly from the original blue to light grey.
[0119] Once the 2.sup.nd bath carried out, the heterojunction PV cell is also rinsed with deionised water.
[0120] I.3. Step of Electrodeposition of Copper.
[0121] Once the ITO modification method has been carried out, the cell is next immersed in the copper electrodeposition bath.
[0122] In order to apply the current necessary for the reduction of Cu.sup.2+ ions into particles of copper metal on the ITO surface, the cell is connected by means of two contact pick-ups situated at the edge thereof.
[0123] The current applied is characteristic of the bath used and is 2.5 A/dm.sup.2 for a given rate of growth of the film of 0.5 μm/min. The anode used is a platinized titanium grid anode. The electrodeposition bath is constituted of 75 g/L of copper sulphate pentahydrate (CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, Sigma Aldrich), 180 g/L of sulphuric acid (H.sub.2SO.sub.4, (Sigma Aldrich), 70 ppm of hydrochloric acid (HCl, Sigma Aldrich) and 2.5 ml/L of an organic brightening agent (Copper Gleam PC Additive, Pegastech).
[0124] The cell is then metallised by electrodeposition of copper at 2.5 A/dm.sup.2 for 1 hour. It is then removed from the bath and rinsed with deionised water. An annealing of 30 minutes at 50° C. is finally applied.
[0125] The thickness of the copper film produced is controlled by profilometry. The lines measure around 15 urn deep before metallisation (
[0126] I.4. Resin Revelation Step.
[0127] The final step is the revelation of the photolithography mask. The cell is immersed successively and for several minutes in two baths of dimethyl sulphoxide (Sigma Aldrich), then in a bath of ethanol (Sigma Aldrich) and finally in a bath of isopropanol (Sigma Aldrich). The cell is finally dried under a slight current of nitrogen, then in an oven at 50° C. for 10 minutes.
[0128] II. Characterisation of the Surfaces Obtained.
[0129] II.1. Characterisation of the ITO Surface Obtained Following Step I.2.
[0130] Once the heterojunction PV cell has been immersed successively in the two baths (step I.2 as defined previously), its surface rapidly goes from the original blue to a light grey.
[0131] By way of comparison, a non-treated cell sample (ITO ref), a cell sample treated uniquely with the ammoniacal solution only containing copper sulphate (ITO-CuSO.sub.4/NH.sub.4OH) and a cell sample treated uniquely with the solution of NaBH.sub.4 (ITO-NaBH.sub.4) are used. This latter sample was used notably with the goal of determining whether the 2.sup.nd bath damaged the optical and electrical properties of the ITO.
[0132] Sheet resistance measurements using a 4-point measurement system were carried out on the samples and the values are grouped together in Table 1. Only the sample having undergone the two steps of the modification method according to the invention (ITO-CuSO.sub.4/NH.sub.4OH—NaBH.sub.4) show a resistance 4 times higher (328.4Ω/□) compared to the other samples (79-80Ω/□). The electrical properties of the ITO are thus not modified by the single bath of NaBH.sub.4 but by the association of the two successive baths.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Sheet resistance measurements of the samples. Samples R (Ω/□) ITO ref 79.38 ITO-CuSO.sub.4/NH.sub.4OH 79.88 ITO-NaBH.sub.4 79.95 ITO-CuSO.sub.4/NH.sub.4OH—NaBH.sub.4 328.4
[0133] The solution of NaBH.sub.4 does not modify either the optical properties of the ITO. The UV-visible spectrum remains unchanged for ITO-CuSO.sub.4/NH.sub.4OH and ITO-NaBH.sub.4 (
[0134] The surface modification produced on the ITO is thus made possible exclusively thanks to two successive baths: the CuSO.sub.4—NH.sub.4OH solution (ammoniacal copper) and the solution containing NaBH.sub.4.
[0135] In order to show the influence of copper sulphate independently of ammonia, samples of non-textured monocrystalline silicon and covered with a deposition of ITO of 100 nm of thickness were immersed in an aqueous solution containing copper sulphate and/or containing ammonia.
[0136] These samples designated ITO (reference), ITO-CuSO.sub.4 (copper sulphate alone), ITO-NH.sub.4OH (ammonia alone) and ITO-CuSO.sub.4/NH.sub.4OH (solution containing copper sulphate and ammonia) were subjected to an electrochemical analysis by OCP (Open Circuit Potential). The open circuit voltage (without application of current), was measured directly in the solution containing NaBH.sub.4 at 40° C.
[0137] The voltage measurements in open circuit presented in
[0138] This surface modification reaction of the ITO thus involves copper-ammonia [Cu(NH.sub.3).sub.4].sup.2+ complexes. To date, the functioning of this step remains unknown.
[0139] The ITO surface that has undergone the two steps of the modification method according to the invention is thus the only one to show differences at the electrical and optical level.
[0140] The EDX analysis presented in
[0141] The morphological modification of the deposition of ITO has been highlighted by SEM and EDX. To study the change of structure of the ITO, X-ray diffraction analyses were carried out at grazing angle on a sample of non-textured silicon, covered with ITO and having been immersed successively in the two baths.
[0142] Analysis by X-ray diffraction shows that the crystallographic structure of the ITO deposition is modified. In addition to ITO, centred quadratic indium metal (reference ICDD 04-004-7737) is highlighted. Taking into account the intensity of the main rays of each of the two compounds (ray (222) for ITO and ray (101) for indium), the composition by weight of each of the two phases in the deposition was estimated at 16% for indium metal and 84% for ITO. It may thus be affirmed that the action alone of each of the two baths does not modify the structure of the ITO deposition, but that their successive action makes it possible to reduce around 16% of indium in the metal form thereof.
[0143] The combination of the different analyses carried out has made it possible to note a real modification of the ITO deposition. The modified ITO sample shows changes not only of the optical and electrical properties thereof, but also the morphological properties thereof: the surface becomes granular, which increases the specific surface; and of the chemical properties thereof: presence of indium metal within the ITO deposition.
[0144] The inventors have also been able to show that copper sulphate and ammonia, used independently, had no effect on the transformation of the ITO. Only the action of copper-ammonia complexes such as [Cu(NH.sub.3).sub.4].sup.2+ is efficient. The most probable hypothesis could be that these complexes, under the action of NaBH.sub.4, play a role of catalyst, thus enabling a transfer of energy capable of modifying the ITO deposition.
[0145] II.2. Characterisation of the Electrodeposition of Copper on an ITO Surface Obtained Following Step I.4.
[0146] The line thicknesses of copper metal obtained following the implementation of the method defined in paragraphs I.1 to I.4 above, controlled by profilometry, are comprised between 18 and 24 μm (
[0147] By way of comparison,
[0148] On the contrary,
[0149] Once the method of metallisation of the cell was finished, contact resistance measurements were carried out. The measurements presented in Table 2 hereafter show that even if the Cu-ITO contact resistances of the cells metallised in accordance with the method according to the invention are of the order of 10 times greater than the reference values obtained for cells metallised according to the Cu ECD method (reference method), they remain all the same low and testify to a good electrical contact at the Cu-ITO interface.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 TLM measurements determining the Cu-ITO contact resistance Sheet R Contact R Specific contact R Width of a plot Rsheet Rc Rhoc Lt (Ohm) (Ohm) (Ohm .Math. cm.sup.2) (μm) Invention 76 1.26 8.43E−03 99 method Cell 1 Invention 78 2.02 1.38E−03 99 method Cell 2 Cu ECD 57 0.0989 1.71E−04 17 method
[0150] Tests of the electrical performances of the cells were finally carried out after laser cutting of the cells. The laser cutting defines around the grid an active surface of 107 cm.sup.2, in order to insulate the active part or the metal grid from the front contact. The electrical efficiencies are very satisfactory (above 20%), and comparable to those obtained by the Cu ECD method. The electrical characteristics of the cells tested are grouped together in Table 3 below.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Electrical measurements I(V) on heterojunction PV cells with front contact made of copper by the method according to the invention and the Cu ECD method (reference protocol). 1 sun IV curve Voc Jsc FF η Plate [mV] [mA .Math. cm.sup.−2] [%] [%] Invention method Cell 1 723.9 37.4 77.9 21.1 Invention method Cell 2 714.1 37.4 77.0 20.6 Invention method Mean 719.0 37.4 77.5 20.9 Cu ECD method Mean 714.1 37.4 78.1 20.8
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
[0151] [1] Bartsch et al, 2014, “21.8% Efficient n-type Solar Cells with Industrially Feasible Plated Metallization”, Energ. Proc., vol. 55, pages 400-409. [0152] [2] Geisler et al, 2014, “Continuous wave laser processing for electrical and mechanical stable solar cells with Ni—Cu metallization”, 4th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV, Energ. Proc., vol. 55, pages 665-669. [0153] [3] Hernandez et al, 2013, “High efficiency copper electroplated heterojunction solar cells and modules—the path towards 25% cell efficiency”, 28th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. [0154] [4] Tous et al, 2014, “Large-area hybrid silicon heterojunction solar cells with Ni/Cu plated front contacts”, 4th International Conference on Silicon Photovoltaics, SiliconPV, Energ. Proc., vol. 55, pages 715-723. [0155] [5] Geissbuhler et al, 2014, “Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells With Copper-Plated Grid Electrodes: Status and Comparison With Silver Thick-Film Techniques”, IEEE J. of Photovolt., vol. 4, pages 1055-1062. [0156] [6] Papet et al, 2013, “Heterojunction solar cells with electroplated Ni/Cu front electrode”, 28th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition. [0157] [7] Masuko et al, 2014, “Achievement of more than 25% conversion efficiency with crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cell”, IEEE J. Photovolt., vol. 4, pages 1433-1435. [0158] [8] Khanna et al, 2015, “Screen-printed masking of transparent conductive oxide layers for copper plating of silicon heterojunction cells”, Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 349, pages 880-886. [0159] [9] International application WO 2007/034116 in the name of Alchimer, published on 29 Mar. 2007.