FEED COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING FAECAL BINDER MATERIALS

Abstract

An extruded, pressed or particulate fish feed is described. Also described is a method for reduction of the content of undesired nutrients in water discharged from a fish farm, and a process for increasing the mechanical strength or shear resistance of faeces from fish in a fish farm.

Claims

1. An extruded, pressed or particulate fish feed, wherein the fish feed comprises feed ingredients such as proteins, lipids/oils, carbohydrates, minerals and vitamins, and wherein a portion of said proteins is guar meal.

2. Feed according to claim 1, wherein said guar meal is extracted from guar beans and replaces conventional proteins.

3. Feed according to claim 1, wherein said guar meal is extracted from guar germ and replaces conventional proteins.

4. Feed according to claim 1, wherein said feed comprises 1-30% guar meal, based on total weight of the feed.

5. Feed according to claim 1, wherein about 10-50% of said proteins is guar meal.

6. Feed according to claim 1, wherein the feed is extruded and wherein guar meal is added to the feed ingredients before extrusion.

7. Feed according to claim 1, wherein the feed also comprises a starch type binding agent.

8. Feed according to claim 1, wherein the feed also comprises a non-starch type binding agent.

9. Feed according to claim 1, wherein said non-starch binding agent is selected from the group consisting of algae meal, calcium alginate and guar gum.

10. Feed according to claim 1, wherein the feed is a feed for use in Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) systems.

11. A method for reduction of the content of undesired nutrients in water discharged from a fish farm, wherein a fish feed fed to the fish in said fish farm comprises feed ingredients such as proteins, lipids/oils, carbohydrates, minerals and vitamins, and wherein a portion of said proteins is guar meal, and wherein faeces particles and/or uneaten feed particles are removed by mechanical filtration from the water.

12. A method according to claim 11, wherein said guar meal is extracted from guar beans and replaces conventional proteins or wherein said guar meal is extracted from guar germ and replaces conventional proteins.

13. A method according to claim 11, wherein said feed comprises 1-30% guar meal, based on total weight of the feed.

14. A method according to claim 11, wherein about 10-50% of said proteins is guar meal.

15. A method according to claim 11, wherein the fish farm is a Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) system, wherein faeces particles and/or uneaten feed particles are removed from the water, and the water is recirculated to the fish farm.

16. A process for increasing the mechanical strength or shear resistance of faeces from fish in a fish farm, wherein a fish feed fed to the fish in said fish farm comprises feed ingredients such as proteins, lipids/oils, carbohydrates and vitamins, and wherein a portion of said proteins is guar meal.

17. A method according to claim 16, wherein said guar meal is extracted from guar beans and replaces conventional proteins.

18. A method according to claim 16, wherein said guar meal is extracted from guar germ and replaces conventional proteins.

19. A method according to claim 16, wherein said feed comprises 1-30% guar meal, based on total weight of the feed.

20. A method according to claim 16, wherein about 10-50% of said proteins is guar meal.

21. A method according to claim 16, wherein the fish farm is a Recirculating Aquaculture System (RAS) system, wherein faeces particles and/or uneaten feed particles are removed from the water, and the water is recirculated to the fish farm.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0044] FIG. 1 shows the data output from Mastersizer for faeces particle size for various feed formulations containing different guar meal concentrations and guar meal types in the fish feed, and shows the % of particles over 50 μm (y-axis) at time 1 (initial) and at time 10 (final) in the Mastersizer, wherein the Mastersizer can be set up to take readings at constant intervals of 30 seconds for five minutes, 60 seconds for ten minutes and the like. Data shown for N=10 fish per tank, 3 tanks per treatment.

[0045] FIG. 2 shows the faeces particle size measurement by the Mastersizer for example 2. The data is shown at the start and at the final sample. Disruption of the faeces is expected with an increase in run number (i.e. reduces particle size). The y-axis gives the percentage of particles at >50 μm for the faeces. Each data point is the sample for a tank of fish (minimum 3 tanks per diet).

[0046] FIG. 3 shows particle size measurements for the test samples of example 3. Data is shown at the start of the Mastersizer measurement and at the end, and disruption of the faeces is expected with an increase in run number, i.e. a reduced particle size at the end of the analysis period. The y-axis gives the percentage of particles at >50 μm of the faeces. Each data point is the sample for a tank of fish (minimum 3 tanks per diet).

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

[0047] The aim of the experiments described below is to test whether various binding agents and dietary compositions in fish feed have an effect on faeces stability. An object is to find raw material inclusions that can be used as feacal binding formulations in fish feed.

[0048] Faeces particle size is an important parameter to measure since faeces is most often removed from the water by mechanical filters, meaning that any faeces particles larger than the filters cut-off value (mesh size) will be removed from the water by the filter. Particle size is thus a good measure for the faecal binding properties of the tested binding agents or feed formulations.

[0049] We have unexpectedly found that guar meal increases the particle size of faeces if the guar meal is included in the feed that is given to the fish. It is known from the prior art that guar gum has a similar effect, and we can obtain similar results with a suitable inclusion of guar meal in the formulations.

Example 1—Effect of Guar Meal in Fish Feed on Faeces Characteristics

[0050] The active compound of the present invention, i.e. guar meal is available from several commercial suppliers and has the following composition range of macronutrients: protein 40% to 66%, fat 7 to 12% and carbohydrates 10 to 20%. The guar seed consists of the hull, the endosperm and germ. The endosperm and the hull is processed to give guar gum, whereas it is mainly the germ that is processed to give the protein fraction and the guar meal. Although there will also be a protein fraction that can be processed from the hull and endosperm fraction of the guar seed. The guar meal is prepared from the guar seed by a variety of processes which may include sieving, roasting, grinding, solvent extraction and drying. We have tested a variety of guar meals for their effects on the physical characterization of faeces from the fish fed feeds with the different guar meals.

Feed Compositions

[0051] The test feeds for this trial were produced at the Technology Centre, Dirdal, Norway. The feed formulation were based on EWOS No Micro Performance feed size 50 containing a target of 35% protein and 34% fat. The detailed compositions of the formulations are given in table 1. Guar meal in the test feeds replaces vegetable protein concentrate. Guar meal A, B and C denotes three different guar meal products indicated as GM A, GM B and GM C in the figures.

[0052] Atlantic salmon were stocked in seawater tanks (n=50 fish per tank, mean weight=1918 g). Faeces was collected from the distal half of the distal intestine in fish by dissection (n=10 fish per tank, 3 tanks per treatment). Faeces were analyzed for particle size by laser diffraction on a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 using a Hydro G wet dispersion unit. The tests were done at EWOS Innovation, Dirdal.

[0053] The Mastersizer uses vigorous mixing when measuring the sample. The machine takes three measurements of the same material in succession while circulating the sample. As a result a decrease in particle size is observed as the test number increases due to the mixing activity in the instrument. The machine can take up to 10 measurements but 3 replicate measurements were determined as appropriate for this procedure.

[0054] FIG. 1 shows that the guar meal has excellent binding properties in contrast to other formulations that we have tested.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Formulation of the fish feed of example 1: Guar meal Guar meal Guar meal Guar meal Guar meal Guar meal A A B B C C Control 5% 10% 5% 10% 5% 10% Vegetable 33.84 28.46 23.18 27.85 21.87 28.28 22.72 protein concentrate Vegetable 19.77 19.28 18.89 19.24 18.94 19.50 19.23 oil Raw wheat 11.68 12.87 13.79 12.88 13.43 12.06 12.43 Fish oil 9.63 9.39 9.19 9.37 9.22 9.50 9.37 Wheat 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 gluten meal Marine 12.49 12.47 12.45 12.48 12.47 12.47 12.46 protein Vegetable 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 protein Amino acid 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.18 0.19 mix Vitamin 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 premix Mineral 1.91 1.85 1.81 1.82 1.74 1.86 1.81 premix Astaxanthin 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10% Guar meal 5.00 10.00 A Guar meal 5.67 11.63 B Guar meal 5.65 11.29 C Yttrium 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 oxide 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Example 2—Effect of Fish Feed Guar Meal on Faeces Characteristics

[0055] We have tested a variety of guar meals for their effects on the physical characterization of faeces from the fish fed feeds with the different guar meals. Guar meal C (termed GM C) has been tested in a different feed formulation (table 2) in the concentration of 6 and 12%.

Feed Compositions

[0056] The test feeds for this trial were produced at the Technology Centre, Dirdal, Norway. The feed formulation were based on EWOS No Micro Performance feed size 50 containing a target of 43% protein and 24% fat. The detailed compositions of the formulations are given in table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Formulations of the fish feed of example 2. Control GM D 6% GM D 12% Fish meal 35.23 34.00 34.00 Vegetable protein concentrate 20.00 16.00 8.00 Raw wheat 12.46 12.15 14.21 Fish oil 9.02 9.12 9.21 Vegetable oil 9.02 9.12 9.21 Wheat gluten meal 8.00 7.13 6.58 Vegetable protein 3.00 3.00 3.00 Amino acid 1.25 1.38 1.63 vitamin premix 0.65 0.65 0.65 Mineralmix EWOS 1.35 1.43 1.49 Yttrium Oxide 0.02 0.02 0.02 Guar meal D 6.00 12.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

Fish Sampling

[0057] Atlantic salmon (mean weight 1400 g; n=40 fish per tank) were held in tanks. Faeces were collected from each tank on a continuous basis for a limited amount of time for each tank. One sample of faeces (not less than 5 g) was collected per tank, and analyzed in the Mastersizer as described for example 1. For each treatment faeces from three replicate tanks were collected for faeces size analysis. The faeces were analyzed as described in example 1.

[0058] FIG. 2 shows a graphical representation of the data obtained from the measurements of faeces particle sizes given as % of particles larger than 50 μm for fish fed the various experimental diets. The Mastersizer uses laser diffraction to characterize particles between 0.01 and 3500 microns. Particles are added and dispersed through a media (water, air, etc.), then light is passed over the particles, and the resultant diffraction is measured. The angle and intensity of the light scattered determine the size of the particles. Then using the equivalent spheres a diameter is calculated from the diffraction pattern.

[0059] The dietary treatments are given in the headings for each result.

Example 3—Effect of Guar Meal on Faeces Particle Size

Feed Compositions

[0060] The test feeds for this trial were produced at the Technology Centre, Dirdal, Norway. The feed formulations were based on EWOS commercial 3 mm pellet containing 46% protein and 23% fat. The detailed compositions of the formulations are given in table 3.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Formulations of the fish feed of example 3. Control GM E 6% GM F 6% GM F 12% Fish meal 27.78 27.00 27.00 27.00 Vegetable protein 30.00 25.00 25.00 18.84 concentrate Raw wheat 11.35 11.23 11.24 11.22 Fish oil 8.64 8.66 8.67 8.69 Vegetable oil 8.64 8.66 8.67 8.69 Vegetable protein 10.00 9.53 9.56 9.50 MCP 1.03 1.11 1.08 1.09 Amino acids 0.92 1.09 1.09 1.27 Vitaminbl. m/MCP 015 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Mineralmix EWOS 1.22 1.30 1.27 1.28 Yttrium Oxide 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Guar meal E — 6.00 — — Guar meal F — — 6.00 12.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

[0061] Atlantic salmon (mean weight 1500 g; n=40 fish per tank) were held in tanks. Faeces were collected from each tank on a continuous basis for a limited amount of time for each tank. One sample of faeces (not less than 5 g) was collected per tank, and analysed in the Mastersizer as described for example 1. The collection of sample was repeated for the same tank for three days. So a total of three samples were analysed per tank, each analysed once by the mastersizer (as described in Example 1).

[0062] FIG. 3 shows a graphical representation of the data obtained for the measurements of faeces particles sizes larger than 50 μm for fish fed the various experimental diets.

[0063] The model output used in this example accounts for the variability between tanks and pools within tanks as random effects.

[0064] Digestibility of the fish fed the various experimental feeds were analyzed (yttrium oxide was added to the feeds, 0.01%). Fish were fed experimental feeds for 2 weeks. Faeces was collected from drain water during the second week using belt collectors from Holland Technology. ADC was calculated using the following equation (Bureau & Hua 2006):

ADC.sub.test ing=ADC.sub.test diet+[(ADC.sub.test diet−ADC.sub.ref. diet)*(0.7*D.sub.ref/D.sub.ing)]

[0065] Where:

ADC.sub.test ing=the apparent digestibility coefficient of the test ingredient
ADC.sub.test diet=the apparent digestibility coefficient of the test diet
ADC.sub.ref. diet=the apparent digestibility coefficient of the reference diet
D.sub.ref=% nutrient (or kJ/g gross energy) of reference diet mash (as is)
D.sub.ing=% nutrient (or kJ/g gross energy) of reference test ingredient (as is) [0066] Reference: Bureau, D. P. and Hua, K. (2006). Letter to the Editor of Aquaculture. Aquaculture 252 (2006) 103-105.

[0067] The digestibility data is given in table 4 as apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) values. Data is for each tank replicate, 2 tank replicates per feed treatment.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 digestibility data ADC DM ADC Protein ADC fat Control 78.4 89.8 93.2 Control 79.6 91.3 93.7 Guar gum, 0.5% 67.4 85.6 86.1 Guar gum, 0.5% 79.8 91.1 91.5 Guar meal, 15% 77.2 90.6 91.2 Guar meal, 15% 74.6 89.3 89.0

[0068] There is little difference between the values of the control diets and the various experimental treatments. Various studies have documented the lower digestibility of feeds containing guar gum.