RESIDENT SUBSEA PIG LAUNCHER AND RECEIVER STATION
20230175631 · 2023-06-08
Inventors
- Gustavo Carvalheira Mazzei (Rio de Janeiro, BR)
- Carlos Alexandre Pereira Patusco (Rio de Janeiro, BR)
- Pedro Nogueira Addor (Rio de Janeiro, BR)
- Jeter Pacheco De Freitas (Rio de Janeiro, BR)
- Camila Do Nascimento Gomes (Rio de Janeiro, BR)
- Daniel Pozzani (Rio de Janeiro, BR)
- Fernando Borja Pereira (Rio de Janeiro, BR)
Cpc classification
F16L2101/30
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
The present invention proposes a resident station of launching and receiving subsea pigs installed in place of THE PLET, in order to enable the application of subsea rigid pipes and the full compliance with the routine internal inspection requirement for monitoring internal corrosion, through bi-directional pigging, mitigating existing operational risks in this type of operation. The invention enables the safe bi-directional pigging of a non-pigable pipe by installing the proposed equipment at the end of the subsea rigid pipe, connecting the pipeline to the main branch in order to ensure shutdown of the pig until the flow is reversed, importing gas from the main branch pipeline, causing the pig to return and be received in the launcher/receiver residing at the FPSO. Thus, the equipment can safely guarantee the periodic and instrumented bi-directional pigging of the pipeline, acting as a launcher/receiver (FIG. 1) residing and aligned to the pipe.
Claims
1- A RESIDENT SUBSEA PIG LAUNCHER AND RECEIVER STATION, characterized by comprising a Main Hub (1), Locking Cover (2 and 4), Service Hub (3), Main Valve (5), Shunt Valves (6), Branches (7), Nominal Pipe (8), Equalization Lines (9) and Instrument assembly (10).
2- The STATION, according to claim 1, characterized in that the Main Hub (1) is responsible for the interconnection via a rigid jumper to the interface equipment.
3- The STATION, according to claim 1, characterized in that the Locking Cover (2) has features for connection testing/remediation and combat of hydrates by pressurization/depressurization and filling with MEG.
4- The STATION, according to claim 1, characterized in that the Service Hub (3) is responsible for the access to Subsea Pig Launcher in the pre-commissioning phases and in case of need in contingency.
5- The STATION, according to claim 4, characterized in that the Service Hub (3) can be horizontal in line with the PLET (30) nominal pipe or vertical.
6- The STATION, according to claim 1, characterized in that the Locking Cover (4) provides a secondary sealing barrier between the medium and the PLET (30).
7- The STATION, according to claim 1, characterized in that the main valve (5) provides a primary sealing barrier between the medium and the PLET (30).
8- The STATION, according to claim 7, characterized in that the main valve (5) is placed in the horizontal section, upstream of the curved section.
9- The STATION, according to claim 1, characterized in that the shunt valves (6) provide a primary sealing barrier between the medium and the PLET (30) and provide through operational maneuvers, the safe receipt/launch of instrumented pigs.
10- The STATION, according to claim 1, characterized in that the branches (7) are responsible for the passage of fluid of the pipeline and comprise a main branch and 2 bypasses.
11- The STATION, according to claim 1, characterized in that the nominal pipe (8) launches/receives the instrumented pig provided for the bi-directional and periodic pigging of the pipeline.
12- The STATION, according to the 1 claim, characterized in that the instrument assembly (10) has subsea corrosion probes, valve placement mechanisms, detectors of the passage and location of pigs and TPT indicators.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] The present invention will be described in more detail below, with reference to the attached FIGURE which, in a schematic and non-limiting manner, represents an exemplary embodiment thereof. In the drawings:
[0014]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0015] Below is a detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the present invention, in an exemplifying manner that is in no way limitative. Nevertheless, possible additional embodiments of the present invention still comprised by the essential and optional features below will be evident to a skilled person from reading of this description.
[0016] A technical feasibility study was then carried out to study these alternatives, assess risks and how to mitigate them. The study concluded that the proposed analysis is technically feasible by mitigating the risks involved in the pig passage operations necessary to guarantee integrity. In order to meet the study's recommendations, it was proposed to install the equipment (that is object of the present invention) in place of the PLET (Pipeline End Termination) to enable the application of subsea rigid pipelines (DRS in carbon steel without an internal lining) and to meet the routine internal inspection requirements for monitoring internal corrosion (critical failure mode in DRS) through bi-directional pigging, mitigating the operational risks existing in this type of operation.
[0017] The equipment proposed by the invention, the Resident Subsea Pig Launcher and Receiver Station (RSPLRS), when interconnected at the end of a rigid subsea pipeline branch that does not include an internal lining as a replacement for the PLET(Pipeline End Termination), is intended to establish an integrated and permanent “launcher/receiver (20) aligned to the pipeline”, hence meeting the routine internal inspection requirements for the monitoring of internal corrosion (critical failure mode in DRS) through the bi-directional pigging, mitigating the operational risks existing in this type of operation.
[0018] The proposed equipment has the following advantages: (i) it allows bi-directional pigging, that is known and applied in the market, from a FPSO; (ii) it eliminates the need for a special vessel for non-resident SPL/RPL (Subsea Pig Launcher and Receivers) installation and use of downlines, (iii) it eliminates any possible water ingress during SPL pigging operations; (iv) it allows contingency access using commissioning SPL; (v) it simplifies the operation as a whole, in addition to reducing operational costs as compared to other alternatives.
[0019] The proposed equipment enables the safe bi-directional pigging of a “non-pigable” pipe branch through the installation thereof at the end of the subsea rigid pipe, connecting the branch to the main branch pipeline, in order to ensure the pig shutdown until reversal of the flow. It imports gas from the main branch pipeline, causing the pig to return and be received in the launcher/receiver (LRP) (20) residing at the FPSO. Thus, the equipment can safely guarantee the periodic and instrumented bi-directional pigging of the pipeline(s), acting as a launcher/receiver (20) residing and aligned to the pipe. The equipment further allows the installation of a subsea pig launcher (20) having interfaces to allow access to the pipeline in case of contingency (e.g., pig trap) and can also be used for commissioning the pipe(s).
[0020] Below are the components, functions and features thereof:
1) Main Hub: Responsible for the interconnection via a rigid jumper to the interface equipment to Rota 3 (PLET/ILT, PLEM), non-pigable, having an ASD internal diameter, compatible with the other branches. The Main Hub also collects the flow of fluid from the bypass branches and should be designed to support the stresses of the Rigid Jumper.
2) Locking cover (main hub): Similar to those used in interface equipment, that is, with features to test the connection/remediate and combat hydrates by pressurization/depressurization and filling with monoethylene glycol, MEG, in the section between the shunt valves and the top face of the main hub.
3) Service hub: Responsible for the access to the launcher/receiver (20) in the pre-commissioning phases and in case of contingency. The Service Hub should preferably be horizontal in line with the nominal pipe of the PLET (30), however it can be vertical, provided that it meets the minimum pigability requirements and can operate with the Rigid Jumper connected to the Main Hub.
4) Locking cover (service hub): Responsible for providing a secondary sealing barrier between the medium and the PLET (30). It should be provided with features to allow the installation/test of connection/uninstallation of the PRECOM SPL over the service life of the PLET (30).
5) Main valve (for access to the Service Hub). Responsible for providing the primary sealing barrier between the medium and the PLET, and the pigable access to the pre-commissioning launcher/receiver (20), a phase known as PRECOM. The main access valve to the Service Hub must be placed in the horizontal section upstream of the curved section.
6) Bypass valves (for access to the main hub): Responsible for providing a primary sealing barrier between the medium and the PLET (30) and providing through operational maneuvers the receipt/launch of safely instrumented pigs;
7) Branches (for access to the main hub): Responsible for the passage of fluid from the pipeline, comprising a main branch and 2 bypasses.
8) Nominal Pipe (for access to main hub): Responsible for launching/receiving the instrumented pig intended for the bi-directional and periodic pigging of the pipeline.
9) Equalization lines: Responsible for the equalization of upstream and downstream pressures of the Pig at the Main Hubs (1) and Service HUB (3); are applicable and arranged according to the scope of the requirements set forth in the guidelines and standards considered in the equipment design.
10) Set of instruments required to monitor the operation of the station and comprises: subsea corrosion probes, valve placement mechanisms, detectors of the passage and location of pigs and TPT indicators.
[0021] The solution as proposed met the need of the project area by providing another technical and competitive alternative in the options of subsea technologies for future projects of export pipelines for the existing networks of the Santos Basin, leaving the decision to use it or not being restricted to economic and market criteria when compared to other applicable alternatives.