2H/1T Phase Contact Engineering for High Performance Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Chemical Vapor Sensors
20170299544 · 2017-10-19
Assignee
Inventors
- Adam L. Friedman (Silver Spring, MD, US)
- F. Keith Perkins (Alexandria, VA)
- James C. Culbertson (Alexandria, VA, US)
- Aubrey T. Hanbicki (Washington, DC, US)
- Paul M. Campbell (Alexandria, VA, US)
Cpc classification
H01L29/66969
ELECTRICITY
G03F7/405
PHYSICS
H01L29/24
ELECTRICITY
G03F1/20
PHYSICS
International classification
G01N27/414
PHYSICS
H01L29/24
ELECTRICITY
G03F1/20
PHYSICS
Abstract
A method of making a low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor comprising providing a monolayer of a transition metal dichalcogenide, applying the monolayer to a substrate, applying a PMMA film, defining trenches, and placing the device in a n-butyl lithium (nbl) bath. A low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor comprising a monolayer of a transition metal dichalcogenide, the monolayer applied to a substrate, a region or regions of the transition metal dichalcogenide that have been treated with n-butyl lithium, the region or regions of the transition metal dichalcogenide that have been treated with n-butyl lithium have transitioned from a semiconducting to metallic phase, metal contacts on the region or regions of the transition metal dichalcogenide that have been treated with the n-butyl lithium.
Claims
1. A method of making a low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor comprising: providing a monolayer of a transition metal dichalcogenide; applying the monolayer of the transition metal dichalcogenide onto a SiO.sub.2/n.sup.+ Si substrate and thereby forming a device; applying a PMMA film to the monolayer of the transition metal dichalcogenide on the substrate of the device; utilizing electron-beam lithography and defining trenches in the PMMA film for the deposition of patterned metal contacts to the monolayer of a transition metal dichalcogenide and thereby creating a chemically accessible region of the transition metal dichalcogenide; and placing the device in a n-butyl lithium (nbl) bath.
2. The method of making a low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 1 wherein the n-butyl lithium (nbl) bath is a 1.6 M n-butyl lithium (nbl) bath in an argon-filled glove box.
3. The method of making a low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 1 further comprising the step of: transitioning the accessible region of the transition metal dichalcogenide to the 1T phase while the PMMA maintains coverage over remaining portions of the monolayer of the transition metal dichalcogenide maintaining the 2H phase in those regions.
4. The method of making a low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 1 wherein the monolayer of the transition metal dichalcogenide comprises MoS.sub.2.
5. The method of making a low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 2 further comprising the steps of: rinsing the device in hexane and deionized water; and depositing contacts.
6. The method of making a low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 5 wherein the contacts are Ti/Au contacts, wherein the Ti is 5 nm and wherein the Au is 35 nm.
7. The method of making a low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 6 wherein the step of depositing contacts is by electron-beam evaporation and lift-off.
8. A low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor comprising: a monolayer of a transition metal dichalcogenide; the monolayer of the transition metal dichalcogenide applied to a SiO.sub.2/n.sup.+ Si substrate; a region or regions of the transition metal dichalcogenide that have been treated with n-butyl lithium; metal contacts on the region or regions of the transition metal dichalcogenide that have been treated with the n-butyl lithium.
9. The low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 8 wherein the region or regions of the transition metal dichalcogenide that have been treated with the n-butyl lithium are transitioned to the 1T phase.
10. The low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 8 wherein the sensor spontaneously recovers after chemical exposure.
11. The low dimensional material chemical vapor sensor of claim 8 wherein the transition metal dichalcogenide is MoS.sub.2.
12. The product of the process comprising: providing a monolayer of a transition metal dichalcogenide; applying the monolayer of the transition metal dichalcogenide onto a SiO.sub.2/n.sup.+ Si substrate and thereby forming a device; applying a PMMA film to the monolayer of the transition metal dichalcogenide on the substrate of the device; utilizing electron-beam lithography and defining trenches in the PMMA film for the deposition of patterned metal contacts to the transition metal dichalcogenide and thereby creating an accessible region of the transition metal dichalcogenide; and placing the device in a n-butyl lithium (nbl) bath.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
[0022]
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0026] This invention discloses 2H/1T phase contact engineering for high performance transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDs) chemical vapor sensors.
[0027] This invention demonstrates that by selectively transitioning the contacts in a transition metal dichalcogenide field effect transistor (FET)-based chemical vapor sensor device, enhanced chemical vapor sensing metrics are established.
[0028] These enhancements include: (1) Ohmic contacts leading to behavior no longer dominated by Schottky effects, (2) complete spontaneous recovery of the sensor after chemical exposure, (3) the removal of band-bending effects at the contacts, which lead to an undesired environmentally variable response to polar molecules, and (4) selectivity to labile nitrogen containing electron donor analyte species.
Example 1
[0029] Devices are fabricated from MoS.sub.2 flakes that are mechanically exfoliated from a bulk crystal onto 275 nm SiO.sub.2/n.sup.+ Si. The n.sup.+ Si will act as a back-gate for later electrical measurements. Thin layers are first visually identified with an optical microscope and then confirmed to be monolayer through Raman spectroscopy, shown in
[0030] As the number of layers increases, the intensity of the peak decreases rapidly and the position shifts to lower energy because of the drastic change in band structure. After the identification of MoS.sub.2 flakes suitable for device processing, we used electron-beam lithography on a PMMA resist layer to define contact regions.
[0031] After development, the devices are placed in a 1.6 M n-butyl lithium (nbl) bath overnight in an argon glove box, while the device channel remains masked by PMMA. This serves to transition only the contacts to the 1T phase.
[0032] Devices are rinsed in hexanes and deionized water before co-aligned deposition of Ti/Au contacts (5 nm/35 nm) by electron-beam evaporation and lift-off.
[0033]
[0034] Further phase identification can be found in the photoluminescence spectra, displayed in
[0035]
Example 2
[0036] Devices are placed on a sample chuck with heating capabilities for in situ device annealing. Electrical contacts are made with Au-coated W probes, attached to a lock-in amplifier. We apply a small low-frequency AC voltage (100 mV RMS, 2.5 kHz), and the current at that frequency is monitored. A small controlled flow (0-100 sccm) of dry nitrogen is bubbled through liquid analyte to obtain a steady flow of analyte at equilibrium vapor pressure. This is in turn mixed with a larger flow (˜5 lpm) of dry nitrogen to obtain a user-controlled concentration of dilute vapor and blown onto the surface of the sample. The analyte vapor stream is directed into and out of the main stream with a computer-controlled solenoid valve.
[0037]
[0038] The FET mobility, μ, of the device can be calculated using:
Here, L and W are the length and width of the channel, C.sub.ox is the capacitance per area of the oxide, V.sub.Drain is the constant drain voltage. We calculate the slope in the approximately linear portion of the gate voltage curve when the device is fully in the on state. The 2H/2H device has μ˜0.16 cm.sup.2/Vs and the 1T/2H device has μ˜32 cm.sup.2/Vs. It is evident that the 1T/2H device has higher FET transconductance and more Ohmic-like contacts than the 2H/2H device. This behavior was consistent for all devices tested.
Example 3
[0039]
[0040] The slight increase in sensor response for each subsequent pulse observed for the 1T/2H device
[0041] In previous studies, we noted that the strongest responses were found for highly polar molecules (such as acetone) and strong electron donors (such as TEA), while electron acceptors (such as nitrotoluene) and neutral molecules (i.e., molecules not expected to either donate or accept charge when condensed on the surface, such as alcohols) generated no response whatever. Response to strong electron donors can be explained using a donor-acceptor model, wherein molecules interact weakly with the positively charged sulfur 2p orbitals, as derived through an understanding of MoS.sub.2 catalyzed hydrodesulfurization reactions. Moreover, while a significant factor in one-dimensional conductors such as nanotubes, the mobility μ is only weakly affected by adsorbates in these macroscopic films where screening by free carriers can attenuate any scattering effects from adsorbed dipoles. Thus, changes in the carrier concentration n from charge transfer are the only significant means of affecting the device conductivity G=μn through analyte adsorption.
Example 4
[0042] Sensing of polar molecules in previous 2H/2H devices was shown to be a purely contact-driven effect, arising from band-bending at the Schottky contacts.
[0043] Therefore, for the 1T/2H devices, we expected to see no response to polar molecules. We monitored the conductance of our devices in acetone, methanol, and ethanol vapors and measured no response, further confirming the superiority of the contacts in the 1T/2H sensors.
Example 5
[0044] To quantify more fully the selectivity of the sensors, we exposed them to a variety of analytes containing nitrogen, including nitrotoluene (acceptor), aniline (donor), acrylonitrile (donor), nitromethane (acceptor), octylamine (donor), and pyridine (donor). No response was produced after exposure to non-labile nitrogen acrylonitrile, or electron acceptors nitromethane and nitrotoluene. We found a weak response to aniline, and strong responses to both octylamine and pyridine, which exhibited a behavior similar to TEA. The difference in responses to acrylonitrile (for which the nitrogen lone pair is relatively isolated), the labile nitrogen-containing aniline (where the nitrogen lone pair is coplanar and partially conjugated with the π bonds in the aromatic ring), and pyridine (where the nitrogen lone pair is orthogonal to the aromatic π bonds), is significant. Exposures of the devices to non-nitrogen containing species, such as dimethyl methylphosphonate, tetrahydrofuran, or 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide produced no response.
[0045] We conclude that the MoS.sub.2 sensors are selective for strong electron donors with a labile nitrogen atom. Since labile nitrogen-containing species are decomposition by-products of many explosives (most specifically the ammonia-based explosives) and nerve agents (such as VX), these devices are potentially quite useful for identification of these agents in practical sensor in applications.
Example 6
[0046]
Example 7
[0047] To explore the dynamics of the 1T/2H sensor response in more detail, we varied the pulse length for a TEA concentration of 35 ppm (
[0048] Referring to the diagram in
[0049] Also referring to
[0050] These new sensors offer low-power, high selectivity, high sensitivity, ease of use, robustness, versatility, mechanical flexibility, and low fabrication expense characteristic. Our sensors have the potential to detect many different analytes with a single sensing suite. They are inherently nanoscale, necessitating minimal space. They require less than 1 uA of current for operation. They can operate over a much wider range of environmental conditions from cryogenic temperatures to over 600° C. and have no dependence on humidity.
[0051] Here, by incorporating phase engineering of the contacts, these new sensors are even more low-power and selective. The sensing behavior is not overwhelmed by Schottky barriers or the behavior of the contacts. These new sensors allow the intrinsic chemical vapor sensing properties of the film to dominate.
[0052] Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the claimed invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. Any reference to claim elements in the singular, e.g., using the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” or “said” is not construed as limiting the element to the singular.