METHODS FOR HEARING-ASSIST SYSTEMS IN VARIOUS VENUES
20170339496 · 2017-11-23
Inventors
Cpc classification
H04R2227/007
ELECTRICITY
H04R25/554
ELECTRICITY
H04R25/43
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
A hearing-assist system for use in a venue in which ambient sounds contain dialogue as well as other components which comprises circuitry inserted in a signal path between a program source feed in a program occurring in the venue and a hearing-assist unit worn by a user in that venue which reduces psychoacoustic conflict and interference between sound which is ambient in the venue and sound heard by the user via the hearing-assist unit.
Claims
1) A hearing-assist system for use in a venue which contains ambient sounds, the system comprising: (a) a processing unit which is connected to an electronic venue sound system in a venue to modify that sound from the venue sound system to a sound signal appropriate for hearing-impaired users in the venue, the processing unit including (1) a first processing stage connected to the electronic venue sound system to receive signals from the venue sound system and including circuitry which reduces selected high-energy components of the sound from the venue sound system and produces a first signal, (2) a second processing stage connected to the first processing stage to receive the first signal and including circuitry optimizing selected components of the first signal and produces a desired component-optimized signal, and (3) a third optional processing stage which receives the desired component-optimized signal from the second stage and includes circuitry to reduce dynamic range of the desired signal and generate a customized signal; and (b) venue-specific circuitry receiving the customized signal from the third processing stage and relaying that signal to a hearing-impaired user in the venue.
2) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 1 wherein the venue-specific circuitry includes circuitry for applying a time delay to the customized signal from the third processing stage.
3) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 2 further including a plurality of venue-specific circuitry, with each of the plurality of venue-specific circuitry applying a time delay appropriate to a specific location in the venue so that a customized signal from the third processing stage reaches a hearing-impaired user simultaneously with an ambient signal in the venue associated with the customized signal.
4) A hearing-assist system for use in a venue in which ambient sounds contain desired components as well as other components, the system comprising: (a) a processing unit which is connected to an electronic venue sound system in a venue to receive sound signals from that venue sound system and modify that sound from the venue sound system to a sound signal appropriate for hearing-impaired users in the venue, the processing unit including first circuitry for reducing selected frequencies in the signal received from the venue sound system to frequencies below a selected level, circuitry connected to the first circuitry to receive signals from the first circuitry and improving quality of desired components of the signal and generating a desired component optimized signal, and third circuitry connected to the second circuitry to receive desired component-optimized signal from the second circuitry and reducing the optional dynamic range of the desired component-optimized signal, and (b) venue-specific circuitry connected to the third circuitry to receive the optimized signal from the third circuitry and relaying that optimized signal to a hearing-impaired user in the venue.
5) A hearing-assist system for use in a venue in which ambient sounds contain desired components as well as other components, the system comprising: (a) a processing unit which is connected to an electronic venue sound system in a venue to receive sound signals from that venue sound system and including signal-energy modifying circuitry which receives sound signals from the venue sound system and which reduces selected energy components from the signals received from the venue sound system and generates a desired component-focused signal, (b) signal-optimizing circuitry connected to the signal-energy modifying circuitry to receive desired component-focused signals and which optimizes the desired component-focused signal for needs of hearing-impaired users and generates an optimized signal, (c) delay circuitry connected to the signal-optimizing circuitry to receive the optimized signal and delay the optimized signal according to a pre-set delay, and (d) signal-transmitting circuitry connected to the delay circuitry to receive the delayed optimized signal from the delay circuitry and transmit that signal to a hearing-impaired user in the venue.
6) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 5 further including signal-receiving circuitry for receiving the signal transmitted by the signal-transmitting circuitry, and a headset which is worn by the hearing-impaired user and which is connected to the signal-receiving circuity.
7) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 6 further including hearing-assist receiver output circuitry, an input plug on the headset and a cable connecting the headset to the hearing-assist receiver output circuity.
8) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 6 wherein the headset includes a sound-isolating element.
9) A hearing-assist system for use in a venue in which ambient sounds contain dialog as well as other components, the system comprising: a processing unit which is connected to an electronic venue sound system in a venue to receive sound signals from that venue sound system and modify that sound from the venue sound system to a sound signal appropriate for hearing-impaired users in the venue, the processing unit including signal-optimizing circuitry connected to the venue sound system to receive signals from the venue sound system and reduce pre-selected energy frequencies from the signal received from the venue sound system and generate dialog-focused signals, and signal-transmitting circuitry connected to the signal-optimizing circuitry for receiving dialog-focused signals and transmitting the dialog-focused signal to a hearing-impaired user located in the venue.
10) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 9 wherein the signal-transmitting circuitry includes delay circuitry for delaying the dialog-focused signal received from the signal-optimizing circuitry by a pre-set time so that the dialog-focused signal arrives at the hearing-impaired user within a preselected time frame with ambient sounds in the venue which correspond to the dialog-focused signal received via the processing unit.
11) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 10 wherein the pre-selected energy frequencies correspond to bass/mid-low frequencies that the hearing-impaired user hears in ambient sounds.
12) A hearing-assist system for use in a venue in which ambient sounds contain dialog as well as other components, the system comprising: circuitry inserted in a signal path between a program source feed in a program occurring in a venue and a hearing-assist unit worn by a user in that venue, the circuitry reducing psychoacoustic conflict and interference between sound which is ambient in the venue and sound heard by the user via the hearing-assist unit.
13) A hearing-assist system for use in a venue in which ambient sounds contain dialog as well as other components, the system comprising: a processing unit which modifies sound heard by a hearing-assist unit worn by a user when that user is attending an event in a venue, the processing unit including (1) signal input circuitry for receiving an input signal from a program source feed in an event occurring in the venue, (2) signal modifying circuitry connected to the signal input circuity and which includes signal-energy processing circuitry which reduces selected high-energy components from the input signal and produces a dialog-focused signal, (3) signal-optimizing circuitry connected to the signal input circuity to receive the dialog-focused signal and which modifies the dialog-focused signal by accentuating certain energies of the input signal and reducing certain other energies of the input signal to optimize the signal for the hearing-assist unit worn by the user, and (4) optional dynamic-range reducing circuitry connected to the input signal circuitry and which applies reduction/attenuation to reduce the dynamic range of the input signal.
14) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 13 further including signal-modifying circuitry connected to the input signal, the signal-modifying circuitry controlling time correlation between ambient sound in the venue and the signal received by the user via the hearing-assist system.
15) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 14 wherein the signal-modifying circuitry further includes sound-customizing circuitry for customizing the signal received by the user via the hearing-assist system in the venue so the sound heard by the hearing-impaired user in the venue simulates sound heard by the user in an environment different from the venue.
16) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 13 further including an ambient-sound isolation element which is worn by the user to physically attenuate the signal received by the user via the hearing-assist system from ambient sounds in the venue.
17) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 13 further including a cord for directly connecting a user's headset to the hearing-assist system.
18) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 13 further including circuitry for connecting a user's headset to the processing unit via a cellular telephone network.
19) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 1 wherein the desired component is speech.
20) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 13 further including circuitry connecting a user's hearing aid to the processing unit via inductive coupling.
21) A hearing-assist system for use in a venue which contains ambient sounds, the system comprising: (a) a processing unit which is connected to an electronic venue sound system in a venue to modify that sound from the venue sound system to a sound signal appropriate for hearing-impaired users in the venue, the processing unit including (1) a first processing stage connected to the electronic venue sound system to receive signals from the venue sound system and including circuitry which reduces selected high-energy components of the sound from the venue sound system and produces a first signal, (2) a second processing stage connected to the first processing stage to receive the first signal and including circuitry optimizing selected components of the first signal and produces a desired component-optimized signal, and (3) a third processing stage which receives the desired component-optimized signal from the second stage and includes circuitry reducing the dynamic range of the desired component-optimized signal and generates a customized signal; and (b) venue-specific circuitry receiving the customized signal from the third processing stage and relaying that signal to a hearing-impaired user in the venue.
22) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 6 further including a cord connecting the headset to the signal-transmitting circuitry.
23) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 5 further including a user personal hearing assist signal input circuity and circuitry connecting the user personal hearing assist signal input circuitry to the signal-transmitting circuitry.
24) The hearing-assist system defined in claim 23 wherein the circuitry connecting the user personal hearing assist signal input circuitry to the signal-transmitting circuitry includes a wireless reception means.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES
[0037] The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
[0038] The full nature of this invention will be understood from the accompanying drawings and the following description and claims.
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0048] The present description is made with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which example embodiments are shown. However, many different embodiments may be used, and thus the description should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
[0049] As explained above, the sound heard by a hearing-impaired, hearing-assist user in a large venue may be muddled and garbled. This muddled, garbled sound heard by a hearing-impaired, hearing-assist user in a large venue is a result of several problems. There may be an ‘overdose’ of bass/mid-low frequencies that the hearing-impaired person receives whereby the bass/low frequency sounds mask the dialog sounds so the dialog is rendered inaudible to the hearing-assist user. The reasons for the overdose are (A) the hearing-assist headset is transmitting the bass and mids, (B) the house system is also transmitting the bass/mids and is heard by the hearing-impaired person through his ears and via body/bone conduction, (C) house reverberation tends to add to the bass energy and create a boom, and there is a timing difference between the headset sound and the ambient, further causing an overall smearing and further loss of intelligibility. Also, a hearing-impaired person may tend to have a hearing loss of mid-mid-high frequencies important for speech, putting the bass even more predominate. Masking of desired sounds by undesired sounds (maskers) can be a function of frequency, both absolute and relative, as well as the loudness level of both the masker and the masked signal and the bandwidth of the masking sound. The system of the present invention permits a venue to control parameters so such masking is minimized and the desired signals reach the listeners.
[0050] More specific examples will be presented herein below.
Home or Classroom Hearing-Assist Situation
[0051] In the typical home or classroom environment, the effect of the ambient room sound is not of concern because it is typically not excessively loud and may be considered in sync with the headset sound since the rooms are small enough that propagation delay of airborne sound from a TV or teacher's voice to the listener is of no concern.
[0052] For example, consider the electronic transmission of sound to a user's headset to be virtually instantaneous. Propagation delay for sound traveling through air is approximately (for ease in this discussion) 1 ms per foot. If a hearing-impaired student is sitting at the back of the classroom perhaps 20 feet from the teacher, the delay until the teacher's direct sound reaches the student as compared to an instant electronic sound is only 20 ms. Additionally, it is of lower volume. Under these conditions the ear and brain assumes the delayed sound is a typical echo and it correlates it with the main sound so no disturbing echo or loss of intelligibility occurs. (Psycho-acoustically, single low level echo delays of up to about 80 ms can be tolerated by most people, so 20 ms delay under these conditions is easily tolerable.) Further, the ambient environment is quiet and the headset audio is relatively undistorted because the only energy being amplified is the teacher's voice. Thus low-cost headsets that do not attenuate ambient sound or even a one-ear headset may be used. Further, in these situations, the dialog/speech energy prevails which is important for the hearing-impaired person to understand the essence of what is taking place.
[0053] In addition to the air-borne delay, most larger venues employ loud, sophisticated sound systems with digital processing and loud speakers, for example, located far above the stage. The added distance and processing may add another delay of perhaps 30-40 ms.
[0054] In summary, the ‘good environment’ of the classroom or similar environment for this illustration:
[0055] 1. Has no delay or timing conflicts between instantaneous electronically delivered sound and the later ambient sound.
[0056] 2. Does not have a loud amplified ambient venue sound (including delays and echoes) which may be even louder than the main headset sound—a situation that reduces the brain's ability to provide intelligibility.
[0057] 3. Does not have excessive music and heavy bass energy-either in the hearing-assist sound stream or the ambient room sound- which would further greatly interfere with intelligibility and may cause distortion to the hearing-assist system itself. (It is of interest to note that many performance directors of musical shows purposely make the music louder than the words of a song. That is so patrons go home humming the melodies which sells musical purchases. Reciting the words would not sell musical purchases as well.)
[0058] 4. Does not have excessive reverberation created by the larger size room of a venue and its hard surfaces. Reverberation may be thought of as a series of long decaying echoes or energy at particular frequencies caused by the sound bouncing off of hard surfaces such as walls, ceiling and flooring. Echo and reverberation of lower and mid frequencies is especially bothersome. This tends to appear to lengthen bass notes etc. so that the energy is available for a longer time to interfere with the desired voice energy. This further interferes with intelligibility and adds to the common complaint that ‘the music is too loud to understand the words’.
[0059] 5. Does not have an excessively wide dynamic range of music and sound effects which may further cause system distortion and be painful to the listener.
[0060] 6. Does not have the talker's or other microphone(s) further picking up the ambient disturbances as above and reentering them into the system as more extraneous energy.
[0061] A common misconception is that the hearing-impaired person does not hear any of the ambient venue sound. This is not true and is a major part of the problem that exists when a classical (i.e. classroom) hearing-assist system is installed in a theater, church or similar venue. There are many audio inputs that a hearing-impaired person may still receive directly which ultimately can interfere with the dialog intelligibility hopefully afforded by the hearing-assist system. These include:
[0062] A. Near normal hearing in one or both ears. (Many people with normal or near-normal hearing often request hearing-assist headsets just to better understand and enjoy a performance. This population too is well-served by this invention.)
[0063] B. Hi frequency loss only. This is a very common situation, especially with age or repeated exposure to high volume concerts. The continued low frequency response admits considerable disturbing energy which masks dialog and greatly interferes with intelligibility.
[0064] C. Body and bone conduction which directly admits disturbing low frequency energy to the inner ear.
[0065] D. Hearing aid amplification increasing the amplitude of ambient house sound at the same time hearing-assist sound is being received. This is because certain hearing aids have the dual or greater capacity to electronically receive the hearing-assist signal and at the same time their microphone may pick up the ambient house sound. Besides the general ‘loud ambient noise’, this may create an ambient sound and/or echoes plus reverberation actually louder than the main microphone signal. This is an unnatural situation to the brain. The result may be ‘gibberish’ or sound like two or more separate voices saying the same thing a fraction of a second apart. Intelligibility is virtually impossible. By experiment, under these conditions the inventor has found that only 10 ms −20 ms or less between the echo and main signal can be tolerated as compared to about 80 milliseconds for a conventional lower-level delayed echo.
Live Theater, Movie or Church and Similar Venues
[0066] There are many ways in which the hearing-impaired person can still hear all or portions of the ambient sound presented to the audience at large. For example, one might consider how very loud movie sound, live theater or concert sound may be as compared to the benign quiet ambient sound in a classroom or home. In addition, it should be remembered that the hearing-impaired person is also receiving sound at the same time electronically via the hearing-assist system. Most often the ambient and hearing-assist sounds are at conflict with each other, especially with regard to intelligibility which for the hearing-impaired person may be virtually impossible.
[0067] Using the same numbering as above for the classroom environment, the conflicts that exist in these environments as compared to the quiet classroom environment for the hearing-impaired person can be considered.
[0068] 1. The hearing-assist sound is electronically transmitted from the source and arrives virtually instantaneously at the user headsets. In the theater/church/movie/concert venues there is typically a powerful house sound amplification system. The system may contain various inherent delays due to digital signal processing and the loudspeakers are often elevated and away from even the first row of the audience, further creating propagation delay of the air-borne sound. Thus there may be a delay of perhaps 30 ms before the loud amplified ambient sound reaches even the first row of the audience. Although the ear and brain might typically deal with delays of this magnitude with regard to soft echoes, this ambient amplified sound may be so loud as compared to the headset sound that the brain is compromised in trying to correlate the signals and intelligibility suffers or the user must subconsciously strain to try to understand the dialog and hence the event. This strain becomes uncomfortable and enjoyment of the event suffers. The further back one sits from the front row additional propagation delay is added, making the problem even worse. Eventually a point is reached, perhaps 50 feet from the stage or podium, where the hearing-assist dialog intelligibility is virtually destroyed because of the long delay and high level of the ambient sound as compared to the instant sound in the headsets.
[0069] The solution to this problem is to introduce a time delay in the hearing-assist system. In this example assume a delay of 40 ms could be added to the hearing-assist sound. Now the time correlation between the ambient and headset sound is greatly improved, reducing or eliminating the intelligibility problem. Finally the point of loss of intelligibility which was at 50 feet before is now at approximately 90 feet which may include the entire theater as an acceptable intelligibility zone. For larger venues, additional hearing-assist transmitters and receivers on different frequencies with longer delays as necessary maybe added to accommodate the rear sections of the venue with regard to keeping the timing of the hearing-assist and ambient sounds close enough for good intelligibility
[0070] 2,3,4. The mere presence of a high noise ambient house sound with added echoes and reverberation interferes with the clear hearing-assist signal. This is one reason some people who have been at a movie, concert or theater event and not been able to understand the dialog due to the loud music or sound effects—including such a high level of sound that an audience member's ears may actually distort from it. All this is worse for the hearing-impaired person in addition to the timing conflicts previously discussed. Especially if the hearing-assist signal is wide-range, a situation is created of excess bass, further interfering with intelligibility.
[0071] A properly designed hearing-assist headset can help mitigate these problems. The headset should provide sound to both ears and contain a degree of isolation to reduce the ambient noise level perceived by the hearing-impaired user. 3,5,6. For the house sound, a show's director may specify a mix with very loud levels of music, bass and sound effects as compared to dialog. This alone may be troublesome to a person with normal hearing. This same mix is typically fed to the hearing-assist system, and it's effects are far worse for the hearing-impaired person if the response is ‘flat’ and includes bass frequencies at full amplitude. For example, if the hearing-impaired person's hearing loss is at high frequencies the excessive bass becomes even more disturbing in masking dialog than it would be for a person with normal hearing. The wide dynamic range of a typical mix may cause headphone and system distortion and even discomfort or pain to the user. Excessive bass energy and wide dynamic range may introduce yet another problem to the hearing-assist system-reduced signal to noise ratio. The maximum transmitter level must be set according to the maximum expected instantaneous signal. This may be much louder than the dialog energy. Thus the dialog energy may be transmitted at a relatively low level. This reduces the dialog signal to noise level ratio at the receiver and makes the system sound static prone or noisy and further inhibits ability to understand dialog.
[0072] Specific implementation details of the invention will now be given. Referring first to
[0073] An example of a quick control screen can be found in BSS London Architect., (http://bssaudio.com/en-US/softwares/hiqnet-london-architect-v6-00-r4-windows), the disclosure of which is fully incorporated herein by reference. This unit has been modified for use in this system. The processing chain includes an input mixer/router which then passes through signal prefiltering. (Highpass and corrective EQ). The prefiltered signal then passes through a 4-way multiband compressor and a parallel compressor. The multiband compressor forces a general tonal shape and balance across the frequency spectrum and the parallel compressor decreases the dynamic range of the signal. Basically, the two compressors work to make the average signal louder by reducing the difference between peaks and nominal and also provides additional separation between foreground and background noises. The compressed and filtered signal passes to the output stage where gain, EQ, and delay can be applied to suit the venue dimensions and correct for differences in assistive listen transmitter/receiver combinations.
[0074] The input signal, 21, is typically the same input signal as furnished to the house public address sound system.
[0075] In this example the function of the first processing stage, 12, is to reduce high-energy components not required for intelligibility by the hearing impaired person. For example, this may be excessive musical bass notes which would cause an “overdose” of bass energy to the user since the bass notes are also received by bone conduction and leakage through headsets from the house sound system. This excessive bass energy, often made worse by reverberation spreading the energy in the time domain, can greatly reduce intelligibility and cause subsequent distortion both electronically and physically to the ear as well as a poorer signal/noise ratio to the user.
[0076] The second processing stage, 13, further optimizes the desired speech components, such as applying filtering to accentuate significant speech frequencies or reduce frequencies outside the typical speech band, adding a moderate amount of high frequency energy to compensate for common high-frequency loss, especially in the speech band or employing speech enhancement techniques such as APHEX or other approaches often used in broadcast systems.
[0077] The final processing stage, 14, applies a suitable reduction/attenuating technique, such as companding (compression of high amplitude signals, expansion of low amplitude signals) or similar processing to reduce the resultant dynamic range. This further improves overall performance by providing a better comfort level to the user, and an increased signal to noise ratio when transmitted over a typical hearing assist system and reduced distortion along with a louder signal of interest (such as dialog) within the hearing assist system including the headset.
[0078] Finally, various stages of delay are added, 15, 16, 17 as required for each section of the venue via its specifically related hearing assist transmitter/receiver system, 18, 19, 20 to improve the time correlation between the ambient house sound and the instantaneous electronic sound in the particular section of the venue served by the respective transmitter as required due to system and propagation delay. As discussed above, a user's brain can accommodate a delay of as much as 80 ms; therefore the system of the present invention can introduce delays in the signal so that the signal from the system reaches the user within a preselected time delay, with the just-mentioned 80 ms delay being an example of the preselected time delay.
[0079] As an example, hearing assist transmitter, 18, may service patrons in the front of the venue and they will be furnished with a receiver tuned to the frequency of transmitter 18. Transmitter 19 may service a “classroom compatible” section of the venue where elementary school youth use hearing aids equipped with FM receivers and activated microphones, with the respective transmitter tuned to the frequency of the students' FM hearing aids and the respective delay optimized for that precise area of the venue. (Severely hearing-impaired adults with similar hearing aids may be able to sit anywhere in the venue since they can turn off their microphone and not hear the venue's ambient sound.) Transmitter 20 may serve patrons in the rear of the venue with delay 17 set accordingly and frequency of the patron's receivers in that area set to the transmitter's, 20, frequency.
[0080] Various delivery options complete the furnishing of the improved sound to the various hearing impaired users. In
[0081] Suitable hearing assist transmitters and receivers are available from a variety of sources such as Listen Technologies.
[0082] Other variations similar to the above will be obvious to one schooled the art; including accommodating interfaces to new hearing devices they become available in the future.
[0083] As one such example consider the use of cell phones as hearing assist receivers. Hearing assist transmitters 18, 19, 20 could be replaced by telephones with line input capability to accept their respective input signals. The telephones could then be connected to existing conference services. Cell phone users in the venue audience could dial the respective conference number and hence be connected to the desired hearing assist signal. These might be standard cell phones or cell phones special-purposed for the hearing impaired. Another variation might use the Wi-Fi functionality of a cell phone within the venue transmitting a Wi-Fi hearing assist signals. Further, the hearing-assist headsets may be equipped with inductive coupling and the system embodying the present invention includes circuitry (TC in
[0084] In summary, the system embodying the present invention completes the following steps to achieve its goals.
[0085] 1. Start with the house sound feed and remove or reduce unwanted energies. Three main reasons are: [0086] a. To reduce sonic overload at the user with regard to sounds typically received through the hearing assist system and the house ambient sound. That creates a muddle heard by the hearing-assisted audience member in a large venue, such as a concert or symphony hall or large church. [0087] a. After this reduction, the remaining electrical signal is composed primarily of the dialogue or other desired frequencies. Thus, subsequent processing can concentrate on the desired dialogue without being distorted or confused by the unwanted energy. For, example an unremoved bass boom could fool a compressor circuit so that it would reduce the dialogue at the time of the boom, clearly the situation that would hurt or destroy intelligibility at that time. [0088] c. Permit the headset or other transducer device to achieve a louder volume of the desired frequencies without the distortion or dangerous loud levels that may be caused if excessive undesired energy were also present at the headset or trannsducer.
[0089] 2. Next, the system processes the audio un-encumbered by excess energy that is unwanted in with the processing optimized for the needs of the hearing impaired users.
[0090] 3. The system then takes the optimized electrical signal and provides a number of output channels as needed. Each channel can include appropriate delay circuitry as needed for a specific purpose. For example the delay can create better general time alignment between the house sound and hearing assist sound. This further gets rid of the muddle and enhances intelligibility.
[0091] 4. Next, the system includes various transmitting means based on how the sound is to be delivered. For example, the delivery system might include different FM transmitters, connection to a wide area network, etc.
[0092] 5. Finally the system can include various options at the user's end. For example headsets covering both ears, or headsets with the foam isolation to further reduce the ambient sound, or patch cables to interconnect the system hearing assist receiver to a user's personal hearing devices (for example, a ‘relay transmitter’ or magnetic adapter to couple the hearing assist sound directly into his/her hearing aid.
[0093] The system embodying the present invention can also be used for the following applications.
[0094] 1. Frequency optimization for music for the hearing impaired. What was described above with respect to dialog will work in a similar manner for music alone. There might be a slight change in frequencies, but the remaining music for a hearing-assist user will still be worthwhile.
[0095] 2. The system embodying the present invention can also be used with echo suppression and noise reduction on the input signal, especially for situations where is the key actors in the venue are not wearing wireless mics so their voices are picked up only a few inches from their mouth. Wireless mics do a lot to increase the signal to noise ratio for dialog. However, in many smaller or low cost venues there are only hanging or floor mics to pick up the actors. The voice sounds further away and the mic is also picking up room reverberation and echoes. These are damaging to everyone (even hearing able audience members often have trouble understanding dialog in these theaters); however, this is especially damaging to the hearing impaired person because the reverberation and echoes may be in the frequency range where their hearing is still most sensitive-further covering up their weaker high frequency dialog intelligibility reception. The above-described system may be modified by adding additional processing steps for these cases when the actors do not use wireless mics. Examples may be (1) echo suppression (borrowed from the telephony world where echo suppressors are used to stop echo from the distant phone), (2) additional filtering of frequencies responding to that venue's reverberation frequencies, (3) volume compression of frequencies related to room reverberation or other lower energy random noise, (4) other intelligibility enhancements.
[0096] The system embodying the present invention can also be adapted for binaural hearing for the hearing-assisted audience members. That is, binaural hearing occurs when a listener receives different inputs from each ear. The listener's brain will fuse the two inputs to form a simple, coherent auditory image which is a function of the difference in the two signals. One difference is, as has been discussed above, the time delay between signals. The time delay for signals received from each side of a venue can be controlled. If properly controlled, a hearing-assisted audience member can receive auditory signals in each ear that will exactly simulate the signals a hearing audience member receives. The stereophonic effect will be similar for both the hearing-assisted audience member and the hearing audience member thereby enhancing the experience for the hearing-assisted audience member. The noise, or masking signal, can also be controlled from each side of the venue so that such unwanted signals arrive at the user in a timed sequence so that the listener's brain compensates and the unwanted signal is ignored by the listener in a phenomena known as masking level differences (MLDs) and can be used to squelch noise and reverberation by binaural hearing.
[0097] In some cases, certain users may have headsets which can be directly attached to the system of the present invention by means of an input plug (IP in
[0098] The system may be used in environments where ‘local ambient echoes’ because of strength or excessive time delay such that the brain does not integrate them out (approximately 80 ms or longer) to delay the original signal transmitted by the hearing assist system until it is essentially coherent with the local echoes and can therefore be integrated by the brain and the speech or other audio signal understood.
[0099] While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.