Use of a natural grape marc extract in order to stimulate the natural defenses of plants

Abstract

The invention relates to the use of a grape marc extract in order to stimulate the natural defenses of plants and to a method for stimulating the natural defenses of plants, which comprises the application on said plants of a composition comprising a grape marc extract.

Claims

1. A method of inducing natural defenses in a plant, comprising applying to said plant, prior to exposure of the plant to a pathogen, a composition comprising an elicitor, wherein the elicitor is grape marc extract that has not undergone composting, and wherein the method induces a hypersensitive response in the plant prior to exposure of the plant to a pathogen, wherein the plant is a tobacco plant, a tomato plant or corn, and wherein the quantity of grape marc extract is from 0.0625% to 0.25% (w/v).

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is an aqueous composition and it is applied by foliar spraying or by infiltration.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the extract includes more than 45% polyphenols by weight in relation to the dry weight of the extract.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the extract includes more than 70% polyphenols by weight in relation to the dry weight of the extract.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the extract includes more than 0.5% anthocyanins by weight in relation to the dry weight of the extract.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the extract includes more than 8% anthocyanins by weight in relation to the dry weight of the extract.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein the composition comprises an aqueous/alcoholic extract of grape marc.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the composition is an aqueous mixture comprising grape marc extract corresponding to a concentration of from 0.1 g/L to 10 g/L dry weight of the extract.

9. A method of inducing natural defenses in a plant, comprising applying to said plant, prior to exposure of the plant to a pathogen, a composition comprising an elicitor, wherein the elicitor is grape marc extract that has not undergone composting, wherein the method induces a systemic acquired response in the plant prior to exposure of the plant to a pathogen, wherein the plant is a tobacco plant, a tomato plant or corn, and wherein the quantity of grape marc extract is from 0.0625% to 0.25% (w/v).

10. A method of inducing natural defenses in a plant comprising applying to said plant, prior to exposure of the plant to a pathogen, a composition comprising an elicitor, wherein i) the elicitor is grape marc extract that has not undergone composting; and ii) the composition is an aqueous mixture comprising grape marc extract corresponding to a concentration of from 0.1 g/L to 2.5 g/L dry weight of the extract; and wherein the method induces a hypersensitive response in a plant prior to exposure of the plant to a pathogen, wherein the plant is a tobacco plant, a tomato plant or corn, and wherein the quantity of grape marc extract is from 0.0625% to 0.25% (w/v).

11. A method of inducing natural defenses in a plant, comprising applying to said plant, prior to exposure of the plant to a pathogen, a composition comprising an elicitor, wherein the elicitor is grape marc extract that has not undergone composting, and wherein the method induces a hypersensitive response in the plant prior to exposure of the plant to a pathogen, wherein the plant is a tobacco plant, and wherein the quantity of grape marc extract is from 0.0625% to 0.25% (w/v).

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1a is a photograph of tobacco seedling leaves infiltrated with grape marc extract taken just after infiltration.

(2) FIG. 1b is a photograph of tobacco seedling leaves infiltrated with grape marc extract four days after infiltration.

(3) FIG. 2 shows an accumulation of transcripts in seedlings treated with the extracts.

(4) FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relative quantity of the expression of SAR response marker gene pr1 in leaves of the same plants, each leaf being treated differently.

(5) FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relative quantity of the expression of SAR response marker gene pr2 in different leaves of the same plants, each leave being treated differently.

(6) FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relative quantity of the expression of SAR response marker genes pr1 and pr2 in relation to the quantity of plant extract.

(7) FIG. 6 is a photograph under white light of tobacco seedling leaves infiltrated with grape marc extract taken eight days after infiltration.

(8) FIG. 7 is a photograph under UV light of tobacco seedling leaves infiltrated with grape marc extract taken eight days after infiltration.

(9) FIG. 8 is a graph showing the Evans blue absorption on infiltrated leaves in relation to the grape marc extract concentration.

(10) FIG. 9 is a photograph under white light of tomato leaves four days after infiltration.

(11) FIG. 10 is a photograph under white light of corn leaves four days after infiltration.

(12) Thus, the invention relates to the use of a grape marc extract in order to stimulate the natural defenses of plants. Grape marc consists of the solid remains after the pressing of grapes, i.e. skins, seeds and possibly stalks. Grape marc thus results from the physical transformation of grapes. The grape marc extract has not undergone composting.

(13) The grape marc extract whose use is proposed makes it possible to induce the expression of defense genes, i.e. to stimulate the natural defenses of plants. As a result, it has elicitation properties.

(14) According to one embodiment, the grape marc extract, whose use is the subject matter of the present invention, includes natural compounds which are synthesized by the grape itself, whose cultivation is widespread, and which are obtained by a conventional method (non-industrial). These compounds thus have a much better chance of being well tolerated and having nontoxic effects. Finally, these natural compounds may be used in organic farming.

(15) These natural compounds are notably polyphenols and anthocyanins. The extract used according to the invention may contain more than 70% polyphenols by weight in relation to its dry weight. The extract may also include more than 8% anthocyanins by weight in relation to the dry weight of the extract.

(16) The grape marc extract used according to the invention can be prepared from red grape marc to which water is added and which undergoes centrifugation. The centrifugation product is then extracted in a water-ethanol mixture containing less than 30% (v/v) ethanol, and then is concentrated under vacuum and atomized with no drying support, so as to obtain a powder. The process is carried out in the presence of SO.sub.2, with no addition of additive. The sulfite added to the diffusion water, at a concentration of about 1 g/l, has the role of solubilizing the anthocyanins and limiting their oxidation.

(17) The natural compounds present in the grape marc extract are compounds that are easy to extract, inexpensive and water-soluble and thus easy to use (easy dilution). They may improve the properties of formulants accompanying the active ingredients due to their photoprotective role.

(18) The use according to the invention is completely suitable for plants selected from the group consisting of agronomically useful plants and ornamental plants.

(19) Agronomically useful plants are selected from the group of the angiosperms comprising the Apiaceae, the Asteraceae, the Brassicaceae, the Chenopodiaceae, the Convolvulaceae, the Cucurbitaceae, the Fabaceae, the Liliaceae, the Polygonaceae, the Rosaceae, the Solanaceae, the Poaceae and the Vitaceae,

(20) The invention also relates to a method for stimulating the natural defenses of plants, which includes the application on said plants of a composition including a grape marc extract.

(21) The composition used in the method according to the invention includes, as active product, an aqueous/alcoholic extract of grape marc. The grape marc extract includes more than 45%, preferably more than 70%, polyphenols by weight in relation to the dry weight of the extract,

(22) The extract includes more than 0.5%, preferably more than 8%, anthocyanins by weight in relation to the dry weight of the extract. The grape marc extract is advantageously obtained according to the method described above.

(23) The composition used in the method according to the invention may foe provided in powder form or in liquid form.

(24) When the composition is provided in the powder form, it is free of any other active agent.

(25) It may also be free of any non-natural adjuvant.

(26) According to a particular embodiment of the method according to the invention, the composition is an aqueous composition that is applied by foliar spraying or by infiltration.

(27) The concentration of grape marc extract in the composition used in the method according to the invention is between 0.10 g/l and 10 g/l, preferably between 0.3 g/l and 2.5 g/l, more preferentially still between 0.5 g/l and 1.25 g/l, for application by spraying with a view to promoting natural plant defenses. A single application before attack by pathogens may suffice. However, it may prove necessary at times to repeat the application at least once several days or several weeks after the first.

(28) The composition is applied at a concentration of 0.1 to 2.0 kg/ha, preferably 0.3 to 1.5 kg/ha, of crops to be treated to promote natural defenses.

(29) Application doses and protocols, of course, depend on the plant species to be treated and to its stage of development.

(30) According to a particular embodiment, infiltration of the grape marc extract takes place at a concentration of less than 0.30% (w/v), preferably 0.05% to 0.30% (w/v).

(31) The method according to the invention may be implemented on agronomically useful plants and on ornamental plants. Such plants are those mentioned above in connection with the use.

(32) The infiltration of a grape marc extract at a concentration of 0.25% on tobacco leaves induces a hypersensitive response (local) accompanied by a systemic resistance response (SAR: systemic acquired resistance), expressing the elicitor effect of the extract, an effect characteristic of the induction of immunity vis-à-vis pathogens. This elicitor effect has been demonstrated at the molecular level by analysis of the expression of marker genes for the SAR response (pr1 and pr2 ).

(33) The elicitor effect of a grape marc extract has also been demonstrated for other dicotyledons (tomatoes) and for monocotyledons (corn).

(34) Use of this extract will enable a reduction in the quantity of pesticides used to protect plants from pathogens. In organic farming, use of this extract will enable a reduction in pesticides.

(35) The invention will be described below in greater detail using the following examples which are given for illustrative purposes only.

(36) The experiments were carried out on transcripts isolated from plants treated with grape marc extract, from plants treated with salicylic acid (SA) (positive control, SA is a known elicitor of the SAR response) and from plants sprayed without elicitor (water, negative control), PR gene expression is analyzed by semi-quantitative real-time PCR enabling the amplification of transcripts of interest. The results show an accumulation of transcripts in plants treated with the extracts, which suggests an elicitor-type response of our plant extracts.

EXAMPLES

(37) In the following examples, the product marketed by GRAP'SUD under the brand exGrape® Anthocyanins is used as the grape marc extract. This product has the following characteristics: slightly granulated dark-red powder total polyphenols: (in catechin equivalents) OD 280 nm: ≧70% (in gallic acid equivalents) Folin-Ciocalteu: ≧60% procyanidins: (in catechin equivalents) Vanillin assay: ≧5% anthocyanins: Bisulfite bleaching: ≧8%

(38) In the examples, this product is called “EXTRACT”.

(39) A β-aminobutyric acid potentiator, referred to as BABA in the examples, is also used.

Example 1

Elicitation on Tobacco Leaves

(40) The EXTRACT at 0.25% (w/v) is infiltrated on the leaves of tobacco seedlings at the 10-12 leaf stage (4-5 weeks).

(41) A photograph of the leaves is taken just after infiltration (FIG. 1a), and then 4 days after infiltration: (FIG. 1b). Four days after infiltration, the hypersensitive response is observed on the leaves that were pricked.

(42) A salicylic acid control (2 mM) is prepared and the SAR response is analysed by real-time PCR.

(43) The results obtained are presented in FIGS. 2, 3 and 4.

(44) These results show an accumulation of transcripts in seedlings treated with the extracts, in the infiltrated or sprayed leaves and the unsprayed or non-infiltrated leaves of the same treated plant, which suggests an elicitor-type response of the EXTRACT.

(45) This elicitor effect was shown at the molecular level by analysis of the expression of SAR response marker genes (pr1 and pr2 ).

(46) The molecular analysis consisted in extracting total RNA from treated tobacco leaves using the Tri-reagent extraction kit (Euromedex). The integrity of the extracted RNA is verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Euroscript (Eurogentec) reverse transcriptase (RT) is used for the synthesis of complementary Dish. Primers (20- to 24-mer oligonucleotides) specific for the pr1 and pr2 genes enabled amplification of the corresponding cDNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplification is monitored in real-time (real-time PCR) based on the fluorescence emitted by the amplification products in the presence of SYBR Green. The specific pr1 and pr2 RT-PCR fragments are quantified using the iQv3 software (BIO-RAD). The abundance of pr1 and pr2 transcripts is standardized (relative quantity) with those of a constitutive expression gene, coding for actin or elongation factor alpha.

Example 2

(47) The same tests are repeated with various concentrations of EXTRACT: 2.5 g/l, 1.25 g/l, 0.625 g/l, 0.312 g/l and 0.156 g/l, and various quantities sprayed per leaf and per seedling. This is done in order to determine the final quantity that enables elicitation.

(48) The quantities used are presented in the following table and the results are given in FIG. 5.

(49) TABLE-US-00001 Dilution from the 1% EXTRACT stock solution X4 X8 X16 X32 X64 EXTRACT 2.5 g/l 1.25 g/l 0.625 g/l 0.312 g/l 0.156 g/l concentration Quantity 5 mg 2.5 mg 1.25 mg 0.625 mg 0.312 mg sprayed/leaf Quantity 15 mg 7.5 mg 3.75 mg 1.875 mg 0.936 mg sprayed/ seedling

Example 3

(50) Various tobacco leaf infiltration tests were carried out with 50 μl of solution as follows:

(51) Test 1: 0.25% (w/v) EXTRACT

(52) Test 2: 0.125% (w/v) EXTRACT

(53) Test 3: 0.0625% (w/v) EXTRACT

(54) Test 4: 0.03125% (w/v) EXTRACT

(55) Test 5: 0.0156% (w/v) EXTRACT

(56) Test 6: 10 mM BABA

(57) Test 7: (positive control): 2 mM salicylic acid

(58) Test 8: (negative control): water

(59) Eight days after infiltration, macroscopic symptoms were observed under white light and under UV light (wavelength=312 nm). The corresponding photographs are presented in FIGS. 6 and 7. In the figures, the numbers correspond to the spot of infiltration of the test of the same number.

(60) It is seen in these photographs that the grape marc extract induces chlorosis (light area lacking chlorophyll) in infiltrated tissues (1 and 2 in FIG. 6) with the appearance of necrosis (dried brown area) when the extract is used at a high concentration (1 in FIG. 6).

(61) BABA (10 mM) (6 in FIG. 6), due to its potentiator effect, and water (8 in FIG. 6) do not induce chlorosis or necrosis at the infiltrated sites. Salicylic acid (2 mM) (7 in FIG. 6) causes necrosis in infiltrated foliar tissues.

(62) The grape marc extract infiltrated at concentrations of 0.25% (1), 0.125% (2) and 0.0625% (3) in tobacco leaves induces a local accumulation of fluorescent compounds (1, 2 and 3 in FIG. 7) characteristic of local acquired resistance (LAR) intervening in plant defense reactions.

Example 4

(63) An Evans Blue assay is carried out on the infiltrated leaves of example 3. Evans Blue is a vital dye that easily penetrates a cell when the cell's plasma membrane is damaged and permeable. It thus shows the loss of cell integrity when there is cell death in the hypersensitive response.

(64) Discs of leaf (1 cm in diameter) punched out around the infiltration point are incubated in Evans solution (0.25%) at room temperature and with moderate agitation for 30 minutes for satisfactory penetration of the dye into the ceils. The leaf discs are carefully washed with distilled water and then ground in the presence of 1 ml of 0.1% SDS until complete homogenization is achieved. The homogenate is centrifuged for 20 minutes at 20,000×g and the supernatant is diluted 8 times with distilled water. The optical density is measured at 600 nm and based on the weight of fresh material.

(65) The results are presented in the graph in FIG. 8.

(66) The foliar tissues infiltrated by the grape marc of tests 1, 2 and 3 exhibit greater absorption of Evans Blue than that of the control water (test 8), suggesting the initiation of cell death.

(67) This reaction is characteristic of the hypersensitive response intervening in plant defense reactions.

Example 5

(68) Tomato leaves and corn leaves were infiltrated with 50 μl of water (negative control), on the one hand, and 50 μl of 0.25% (w/v) EXTRACT, on the other hand.

(69) Four days after infiltration, photographs were taken under white light. These photographs are presented as FIG. 9 for tomato and as FIG. 10 for corn.

(70) In these figures, it is seen that the grape marc extract infiltrated at 0.25% (50 μl) induces a hypersensitive response (necrosis) in tomato (a dicotyledon) and in corn (a monocotyledon).

REFERENCES

(71) Aziz et al. (2003), Laminarin elicits defense responses in grapevine and induces protection against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola. MPMI, 16(12):1118-1128.

(72) Daayf, F., Schmitt, A., Belanger, R. R., 1997. Evidence of phytoalexins in cucumber leaves infected with powdery mildew following treatment with leaf extracts of Reynoutria sachalinenesis. Plant Physiol., 113, 719-727.

(73) Doubrava, N. S., Dean, R. A., Kuc, J., 1988. Induction of systemic resistance to anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lagenarium in cucumber by oxalate and extracts from spinach and rhubarb leaves. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 33, 69-79.

(74) Klarzynski et al. (2000). Linear b-1,3-glucans are elicitors of defense responses in tobacco. Plant Physiol., 124:1027-1037.

(75) Godard et al. (2009). Induction of defence mechanisms in grapevine leaves by emodin- and anthroquinone-rich plant extracts and their conferred resistance to downy mildew. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 47, 827-837.

(76) Narwal et al. (2000). A systemic resistance inducing antiviral protein with N-glycosidase activity from Bougainvillea xbuttiana leaves. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 39, 600-603.

(77) Paul and Sharma (2002). Azadirachta indica leaf extract induces resistance in barley against leaf stripe disease. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 61, 3-13.

(78) Randoux at al, (2006). Inhibition of Blumeria graminis f. sp. Tritici germination and partial enhancement of wheat defenses by Milsana. Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 96, 1278-1286.

(79) Sharathchandra et al. (2004). A chitosan formulation Elexa™ induced downy mildew disease resistance and growth promotion in pearl millet. Crop Protection, 23:381-888.

(80) Tosun et al. (2003). The effect of HarpinEa as plant activator in control of bacterial and fungal diseases of tomato. Congrès Acta horticulturae, 2003, no. 616, pp. 251-254

(81) Varnier et al. (2009). Bacterial rhamnolipids are novel MAMPs conferring resistance to Botrytis cinerea in grapevine. Plant, Cell and Environment, 32, 178-193.