Floating liquefied natural gas pretreatment system
09791106 · 2017-10-17
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F25J2205/80
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J1/0259
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F17C13/082
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2220/66
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2220/60
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
B01D2257/602
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
F25J2205/60
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J1/0278
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Y02C20/40
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
F25J1/0022
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F17C13/08
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J1/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A pretreatment system and method for a floating liquid natural gas (“FLNG”) facility are presented. The inlet natural gas stream flows through a membrane system to remove carbon dioxide and a heat exchanger, producing first and second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate streams. The first cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream is routed to additional pretreatment equipment, while the second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream is routed directly to a LNG train. Alternatively, the inlet natural gas stream may flow through a membrane system to produce a single cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream that is routed to the LNG train after sweetening and dehydration. Because the pretreatment system delivers the incoming gas stream to the LNG train at a lower temperature than conventional systems, less energy is needed to convert the gas stream to LNG. In addition, the pretreatment system has a smaller footprint than conventional pretreatment systems.
Claims
1. A pretreatment method for cooling and purifying a natural gas stream for processing into LNG, the method comprising: passing an inlet natural gas stream through a membrane system to produce a cooled CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream and a cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream; routing the cooled CO2-rich permeate stream and the cooled CO2-depleted non-permeate stream directly to a heat exchanger; cross-exchanging heat in the heat exchanger between the cooled CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream and the cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream with a substantially water-free natural gas outlet stream of a gas dehydration unit to produce a heated CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream, a first cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream and a second cooled CO2-depleted non-permeate stream; routing the first cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream to additional pretreatment equipment; and directing the second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream directly to a LNG train.
2. A pretreatment method according to claim 1 further comprising processing the inlet natural gas stream in a mercury removal system to form a substantially mercury-free natural gas stream.
3. A pretreatment method according to claim 2 wherein the mercury removal system is a mercury/H.sub.2S removal bed.
4. A pretreatment method according to claim 1 further comprising removing mercury to a level required to protect downstream equipment.
5. A pretreatment method according to claim 1 wherein the additional pretreatment equipment is chosen from the group consisting of a gas sweetening system and a gas dehydration system.
6. A pretreatment method according to claim 1 wherein the membrane system is a CO.sub.2 removal membrane system.
7. A pretreatment method according to claim 2 wherein the mercury removal system is located after the additional pretreatment equipment.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described in further detail. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following detailed description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings (which are not to scale) where:
(2)
(3)
(4)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(5) It is to be understood that the invention that is now to be described is not limited in its application to the details of the construction and arrangement of the parts illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in a variety of ways. The phraseology and terminology employed herein are for purposes of description and not limitation.
(6) Elements shown by the drawings are identified by the following numbers: 10 From FLNG production/topside 19 Inlet natural gas stream 20 Mercury removal system 21 Substantially mercury-free natural gas stream 30 Membrane system 31 Cooled CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream 33 Cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 40 Heat exchanger 41 First cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 43 Second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 45 Heated CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream 50 Gas sweetening system 51 Sweetened natural gas stream 60 Gas dehydration system 61 Substantially water-free natural gas outlet stream 70 To LNG train 71 Single cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 80 LNG gathering system
(7) This invention describes a pretreatment system that delivers the incoming gas stream to the LNG train at a lower temperature than conventional systems. As a result, less energy is needed to convert the gas stream to LNG. In addition, the pretreatment system has a smaller footprint than conventional pretreatment systems.
(8) As shown in
(9) As shown in
(10) The membrane system 30 may be primarily responsible for removing carbon dioxide from the substantially mercury-free natural gas stream 21. As an example, the membrane system 30 is preferably one or more CYNARA® CO.sub.2 removal membrane systems (Cameron Process Systems, Houston, Tex.) or its equivalent. As the substantially mercury-free natural gas stream 21 passes through the membrane system 30, it is naturally cooled to produce a cooled CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream 31 and a cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 33. Both non-permeate and permeate streams 31, 33 may then be fed to a heat exchanger 40.
(11) In the heat exchanger 40, heat from the cooled CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream 31 and the cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 33 is cross-exchanged with a substantially water-free natural gas outlet stream 61 from a gas dehydration system 60 to produce a first cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 41, a second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 43, and a heated CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream 45. The heated CO.sub.2-rich permeate stream 45 leaves the pretreatment system and is used as fuel or can be reinjected.
(12) After leaving the heat exchanger 40, the first cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 41 may pass through a gas sweetening system 50 that produces a sweetened natural gas stream 51. As an example, the gas sweetening system 50 may be a hybrid system that includes a membrane system for removing carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide followed by an amine unit for removing carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide to the level required by the downstream refrigeration unit. The sweetened natural gas stream 51 may then pass through a gas dehydration system 60. The gas dehydration system 60 removes water from the sweetened natural gas stream 51 to produce a substantially water-free natural gas outlet stream 61 which is fed to the heat exchanger 40. The gas dehydration system 60 may include, but is not limited to, molecular sieves and hydrocarbon dew pointing.
(13) The second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 43 may leave the heat exchanger 40 and be routed directly to a LNG train 70. Because the second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 43 has been cooled by the membrane system 30 and further cooled by the heat exchanger 40, the temperature at which it is delivered to the LNG train 70 is significantly reduced when compared to conventional pretreatment systems. For example, the temperature of the second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 43 may be about 15° C. to 21° C. (60° F. to 70° F.), while the temperature at which a conventional pretreatment system delivers natural gas to a LNG train is about 37° C. to 48° C. (100° F. to 120° F.). Delivering the second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 43 to the LNG train 70 at a cooler temperature reduces the overall LNG refrigeration load and the amount of energy required.
(14) As another example, the temperature of the outlet gas from a conventional pretreatment system may range from about 41° C. to 43° C. (105° F. to 110° F.). A dual-mixed refrigerant system with a design capacity of two million tons per annum (“mtpa”) LNG requires 62 megawatts (“MW”) of energy to convert outlet gas at that temperature to LNG. In contrast, as shown in the table below, the outlet gas temperature for the pretreatment system of the present invention ranges from about 26° C. to 35° C. (78° F. to 95° F.) as carbon dioxide inlet and outlet concentrations vary:
(15) TABLE-US-00001 Feed Gas Product Gas Predicted Outlet Predicted Outlet CO.sub.2 CO.sub.2 Gas Temperature Gas Temperature (mol %) (mol %) (° C.) (° F.) 20 7 26 78 15 7 29 84 10 7 32 89 7 3 33 91 5 3 35 95
Because the temperature of the outlet gas is lower, the LNG train requires less energy to convert the outlet gas to LNG. This energy savings when compared to the conventional pretreatment system is about five to fifteen percent.
(16) Like the second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 43, the first cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 41 may also pass through the membrane system 30 and the heat exchanger 40, reducing its temperature before it enters the gas dehydration system 60. In addition, the second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate stream 43 entirely bypasses the gas dehydration system 60. As a result, the gas dehydration system 60 has to treat less gas, and the gas that it does treat is at a lower temperature. The size of the gas dehydration system 60 may therefore be reduced, and the pretreatment system requires less floor space than conventional pretreatment systems.
(17) As an alternative, the first and second cooled CO.sub.2-depleted non-permeate streams 41, 43 may be used to cool the inlet natural gas stream 19, the substantially mercury-free natural gas stream 21, or both. If the natural gas is rich in heavy hydrocarbons, this cooling results in heavy hydrocarbon and water condensation in the inlet gas stream. This reduces the amount of water and heavy hydrocarbons that enter the pretreatment system, thereby reducing the overall processing load on the pretreatment section of the FLNG system.
(18) An alternate embodiment of a FLNG pretreatment system to cool and purify an inlet stream of natural gas is shown in
(19) A FLNG pretreatment system and method have been disclosed. While the invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is manifest that many changes may be made in the details of construction, the types and arrangement of components, and the number and order of pretreatment steps without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure. It is understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments set forth herein for purposes of exemplification, but is to be limited only by the scope of the attached claims, including the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled.