Coated metallic substrate

Abstract

A coated metallic substrate including at least a first coating of aluminum, such first coating having a thickness below 5 μm and being directly topped by a second coating including from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc.

Claims

1. A coated metallic substrate comprising: a metallic substrate; and a first coating on the metallic substrate, the first coating consisting of aluminum and having a thickness between 2 and 4 μm and being directly topped by a second coating including from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, a balance of the second coating being zinc.

2. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 wherein the second coating has a thickness between 1 and 10 μm.

3. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 wherein the second coating comprises from 0.5 to 4.5% by weight of magnesium.

4. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 3 wherein the second coating comprises from 0.5 to 2.0% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc.

5. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 wherein the second coating comprises from 2.0 to 5.0% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc.

6. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 wherein the second coating does not comprise at least one of the following elements chosen among: aluminum, silicon and copper.

7. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 wherein the second coating consists of zinc and magnesium.

8. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 wherein the microstructure of the second coating comprises less than 95% by weight of Mg2Zn11 phases in a Zn matrix.

9. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 further comprising an intermediate layer between the metallic substrate and the first coating, the intermediate layer including iron, nickel, and chromium.

10. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 9 wherein the intermediate layer further includes titanium.

11. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 10, wherein the intermediate layer comprises Fe, Ni, Cr and Ti wherein an amount of Ti is above or equal to 5 wt. % and wherein the following equation is satisfied: 8 wt. %<Cr+Ti<40 wt. %, the balance being Fe and Ni.

12. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 9, wherein the intermediate layer comprises at least 8% by weight nickel and at least 10% by weight chromium, a balance being iron.

13. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 9, wherein the intermediate layer comprises 16-18% by weight chromium, 10-14% by weight nickel, a balance being iron.

14. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 wherein the metallic substrate selected from one of the group consisting of: aluminum substrate, steel substrate, stainless steel substrate, copper substrate, iron substrate, copper alloys substrate, titanium substrate, cobalt substrate and nickel substrate.

15. A method for the manufacture of the coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1, the method comprising the following steps: providing the metallic substrate; depositing the first coating consisting of aluminum at a thickness between 2 and 4 μm; and depositing the second coating including from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc.

16. The method as recited in claim 15 further comprising preparing a surface of the metallic substrate after the providing step and before the depositing of the first coating.

17. The method as recited in claim 16 wherein the preparing of the surface includes at least one of the following group consisting of: shot blasting, pickling, etching, polishing, sand blasting, grinding and deposition of an intermediate layer comprising iron, nickel, chromium and optionally titanium.

18. The method as recited in claim 15 wherein the depositing of the first and second coatings occurs independently from each other and is performed by a hot-dip coating, by electro-deposition process or by vacuum deposition.

19. The method as recited in claim 18 wherein the depositing of the first and second coating occurs by vacuum deposition, and the first and second coatings independently from each other are deposited by magnetron cathode pulverization process, jet vapor deposition process, electromagnetic levitation evaporation process or electron beam physical vapor deposition.

20. A method for manufacturing an automotive vehicle part comprising: manufacturing the automotive vehicle part using the coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1.

21. An installation for continuous vacuum deposition of coatings on a running metallic substrate to obtain the coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1 comprising in the following order: a first section including an electron beam evaporation device; and a second section including a jet vapor evaporation device.

22. The installation as recited in claim 21 further comprising an intermediate section including a magnetron cathode pulverization device upstream from the first section.

23. The installation as recited in claim 22 wherein the magnetron cathode pulverization device includes a vacuum deposition chamber including one target made of iron, chromium, nickel and optionally titanium, and a plasma source to deposit an intermediate layer comprising iron, nickel, chromium and optionally titanium on the metallic substrate.

24. The installation as recited in claim 21 wherein in the first section, the electron beam evaporation device includes a vacuum deposition chamber including an evaporation crucible including metal consisting of aluminum, a heating device and an electron gun.

25. The installation as recited in claim 21 wherein in the second section, the jet vapor evaporation device includes a vacuum deposition chamber including a vapor jet coater and at least one evaporation crucible suited to feed the vapor jet coater with a vapor comprising from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc.

26. The coated metallic substrate as recited in claim 1, wherein the thickness of the first coating is between 2 and 3 μm.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) To illustrate the invention, various embodiments and trials of non-limiting examples will be described, particularly with reference to the following Figures:

(2) FIG. 1 is an illustration of the specimen used for the LME test.

(3) FIG. 2 is a corrosion cycle according to the norm VDA 233-102.

(4) FIG. 3 shows schematically an installation according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(5) In all the figures, the thickness of the layers represented is exclusively for purposes of illustration and cannot be considered to be a representation of the different layers to scale.

(6) The following terms will be defined:

(7) “wt. %” means the percentage by weight.

(8) The inventions relates to a coated metallic substrate comprising at least a first coating consisting of aluminum, such first coating having a thickness below 5 μm and being directly topped by a second coating comprising from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc.

(9) The first coating consists of aluminum, i.e. the amount of aluminum in the first coating is above 99.0% by weight.

(10) The first coating having a thickness below 5 μm means that the thickness of the first coating is above 0 μm and below 5 μm.

(11) Without willing bound by any theory, it is believed that the above coated metallic substrate allows for a high protection against corrosion. Indeed, it seems that the first layer consisting of aluminum provides a high barrier effect mainly due to the presence of aluminum. It is believed that the thickness of the first coating has to be below 5 μm since the barrier effect is highly obtained and above 5 μm there is a risk to significantly reduce the productivity and over complicate the deposition method. Moreover, it is believed that the second coating allows for a high sacrificial protection mainly due to the combination of magnesium and zinc, the magnesium being in a specific amount. Additionally, when the amount of Mg is above 5.9%, it seems that powdering problems occurs in the second coating. Finally, the coated metallic substrate having the first and second layers has a high resistance to LME. Consequently, with the specific coated metallic substrate according to the present invention, it is possible to obtain a coated metallic substrate having a high barrier effect, a high sacrificial protection in addition to a resistance to LME.

(12) In a preferred embodiment, the first coating has a thickness between 2 and 4 μm.

(13) Preferably, the second coating has a thickness between 1 and 10 μm.

(14) Advantageously, the second coating comprises from 0.5 to 4.5%, more preferably from 0.5 to 2.0%, by weight of magnesium.

(15) In another preferred embodiment, the second coating comprises from 2.0 to 5.0% by weight of magnesium.

(16) In a preferred embodiment, the second coating does not comprise at least one of the following elements chosen among: aluminum, silicon and copper.

(17) Preferably, the second coating consists of zinc and magnesium.

(18) Advantageously, the microstructure of the second coating comprises Mg.sub.2Zn.sub.11 phases in a Zn matrix. Indeed, without willing to be bound by any theory, if the second coating comprises at least 95% by weight of Mg.sub.2Zn.sub.11 in Zn matrix instead of less than 95% by weight of Mg.sub.2Zn.sub.11 phases in a Zn matrix, there is a risk to obtain a brittle coating allowing powdering problems. For example, the second coating comprises less than 85%, preferably less than 75% by weight of Mg.sub.2Zn.sub.11 in Zn matrix.

(19) Preferably, an intermediate layer is present between the metallic substrate and the first coating, such intermediate layer comprising iron, nickel, chromium and optionally titanium. Without willing to be bound by any theory, it seems that the intermediate coating layer further improves the adhesion of the first coating on a metallic substrate.

(20) Thus in a preferred embodiment, the intermediate layer comprises at least 8% by weight nickel and at least 10% by weight chromium, the rest being iron. For example, the layer of metal coating is 316 stainless steel including 16-18% by weight Cr and 10-14% by weight Ni, the balance being Fe.

(21) In another preferred embodiment, the intermediate layer comprises Fe, Ni, Cr and Ti wherein the amount of Ti is above or equal to 5 wt. % and wherein the following equation is satisfied: 8 wt. %<Cr+Ti<40 wt. %, the balance being Fe and Ni, such intermediate coating layer being directly topped by a coating layer being an anticorrosion metallic coating.

(22) The metallic substrate can be chosen among: aluminum substrate, steel substrate, stainless steel substrate, copper substrate, iron substrate, copper alloys substrate, titanium substrate, cobalt substrate or nickel substrate.

(23) The present invention also relates to a method for the manufacture of a coated metallic substrate according to the present invention comprising the following steps: A. provision of a metallic substrate, B. optionally, a surface preparation step of the metallic substrate, C. deposition of the first coating consisting of aluminum, such first coating having a thickness below 5 μm and D. deposition of the second coating comprising from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc.

(24) Preferably, in when step B) is performed, the surface treatment is chosen from: shot blasting, pickling, etching, polishing, sand blasting, grinding and the deposition of an intermediate layer comprising iron, nickel, chromium and optionally titanium. Preferably, the surface treatment consists in depositing an intermediate layer on the metallic substrate. Moreover, the intermediate layer permits to avoid the removal of the oxide layer naturally present on the metallic substrate.

(25) Preferably, In steps C) and D), the deposition of the first and second coatings independently of one another are performed by a hot-dip coating, by electro-deposition process or by vacuum deposition. For example, the first coating is deposited by hot-dip and the second coating by vacuum deposition. In another example, the first and seconds coatings are deposited by vacuum deposition.

(26) In steps C) and D), when vacuum deposition is performed, the first and second coatings independently of one another are deposited by magnetron cathode pulverization process, jet vapor deposition process, electromagnetic levitation evaporation process or electron beam physical vapor deposition. For example, the first coating is deposited by magnetron cathode pulverization process and the second coating is deposited by jet vapor deposition process.

(27) The present invention also relates to the use of the coated metallic substrate according to the present invention for the manufacture of a part of an automotive vehicle.

(28) Finally, the present invention relates to an installation 100 (shown schematically) for continuous vacuum deposition of coatings on a running metallic substrate 10 using the method according to the present invention for the manufacture of a coated metallic substrate according to the present invention comprising in the following order: A. Optionally, an intermediate section 20 comprising a magnetron cathode pulverization device 120, B. A first section 30 comprising an electron beam evaporation device 130 to deposit a first coating 14 based on aluminum and C. A second section 40 comprising a jet vapor evaporation device 140 to deposit a second coating 16.

(29) Preferably, when the intermediate section 20 is present, the magnetron cathode pulverization device 120 comprises a vacuum deposition chamber 122 comprising one target 124 made of iron, chromium, nickel and optionally titanium and a plasma source 126 to deposit an intermediate layer 12 comprising iron, nickel, chromium and optionally titanium on the metallic substrate.

(30) In this case, inert gas is injected into the vacuum deposition chamber being at a pressure between 10.sup.−4 and 10.sup.−7 bar. The plasma source creates a plasma which electrically charges the gas. Surface atoms of the target are physically ejected by the bombardment of energetic particles (ions) created in a plasma. Ejected atoms deposit on the metallic substrate.

(31) In the first section 30, the electron beam evaporation device 130 comprises a vacuum deposition chamber 132 comprising an evaporation crucible 134 comprising metal consisting of aluminum, a heating device 138 and an electron gun 136.

(32) In the second section 40, the jet vapor evaporation device 140 comprises a vacuum deposition chamber 142 comprising a vapor jet coater 146 and at least one evaporation crucible 144 suited to feed the vapor jet coater with a vapor comprising from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc.

(33) Preferably, the vapor jet coater is a sonic vapor jet coater and the evaporation crucible comprises an induction heater.

(34) Advantageously, a recharging furnace is placed beneath the evaporation crucible and is adapted to be maintained at atmospheric pressure. More preferably, the recharging furnace is connected to a metal ingot feed means.

(35) In the vacuum deposition chamber, beside the face of the metallic substrate which has to be coated, there is a vapor jet coater. This coater is suited to spray a metal alloy vapor comprising from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc onto the running substrate.

(36) The vapor jet coater is mounted on an evaporation crucible suited to feed the vapor jet coater with a vapor comprising from 0.5 to 5.9% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc. In one preferred embodiment, one evaporation crucible is suited to contain a metal alloy bath comprising magnesium and zinc generating the vapor to be deposited on the substrate. In another preferred embodiment, two evaporation crucibles are used, one evaporator crucible containing magnesium and one evaporator crucible containing zinc, the mixture of zinc and magnesium vapors is deposited on the substrate. Preferably, the at least evaporation crucible is preferably located in the deposition chamber.

(37) The evaporation crucible can be provided with heating means enabling the metal alloy vapor to form and to feed the vapor jet coater. The evaporation crucible is advantageously provided with an induction heater which has the advantage of making the stirring and the composition homogenization of the metal alloy bath easier.

(38) The pressure in the evaporation crucible depends on the bath temperature and on the metal bath composition. It generally varies between 10.sup.−3 and 10.sup.−1 bar. Accordingly, the pressure in the deposition chamber is kept below the one in the evaporation crucible (typically around 10.sup.−4 bar).

(39) The at least evaporation crucible can be connected to a continuous feeding system of zinc and/or magnesium. The continuous feeding comprises preferably a recharging furnace suited to feed the evaporation crucible with zinc in molten state and capable of maintaining a constant level of liquid in the evaporation crucible. the recharging furnace is preferably located outside of the vacuum deposition chamber. The recharging furnace is preferably placed beneath the evaporation crucible and adapted to be maintained at atmospheric pressure. Due to the height between the evaporation crucible and the recharging furnace and to the pressure difference created between them, the molten main element goes up in the evaporation crucible by barometric effect as the metal bath evaporates. This ensures a continuous feeding of the evaporation crucible and contributes to maintaining a constant level of liquid in the evaporation crucible, whatever the line speed. Preferably, the continuous feeding further comprises a feeding unit suited to be fed with magnesium in solid state and suited to feed the evaporation crucible with the at least one additional element indifferently in molten state, in solid state or partially in solid state.

(40) The invention will now be explained in trials carried out for information only. They are not limiting.

EXAMPLES

(41) For all samples, the chemical composition of the steel sheet used is as follows: 0.2% by weight of C, 1.5% by weight of Si, 2% by weight of Mn, 0.04% by weight of Al, the balance being iron.

(42) For Trial 1, a coating of Zn was deposited by electrodeposition on a steel sheet.

(43) For Trials 2 and 3, a coating comprising 4% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc was deposited by magnetron cathode pulverization process.

(44) For Trials 4 and 5, an intermediate layer being 316 stainless steel including 16-18% by weight Cr and 10-14% by weight Ni, the balance being Fe was deposited by magnetron cathode pulverization, a first coating of aluminum was deposited by electron beam deposition and a second coating comprising 4% by weight of magnesium, the balance being zinc was deposited by JVD.

(45) For Trial 6, no coating was deposited on the steel sheet.

Example 1: LME Test

(46) In order to measure LME sensitivity, high temperature tensile test was performed in conditions as close as possible to spot welding conditions.

(47) Tensile specimens are illustrated in FIG. 1. Two holes in the heads are machined to inserts pins and thus ensuring no sliding during the test.

(48) Then, a preload force of 1 kN is applied on each specimen. The specimens are heated at a heating rate about 1000° C./s to reach a temperature between 750 and 950° C. When the temperature is reached, displacement is applied to specimens until a full failure. A strain rate of 3 mm/s was used during the test.

(49) Stress-strain curves are determined and analyzed. The derived of this stress-strain curve is calculated and drawn. Steel elongation when the strain derivative is minimum, corresponds to the fracture of the specimen. If this fracture results from an LME phenomenon, i.e. if liquid zinc is present in cracks, this elongation is defined as the “critical LME elongation value”. If this fracture is a ductile fracture, the elongation is defined as “critical elongation value”. This value then plotted as a function of the temperature of the tensile test.

(50) Results are shown in the following Table 1: 0 means excellent, in other words, there is no liquid zinc in cracks, i.e. the fracture is ductile; 1 means bad, in other words, liquid zinc is present in cracks corresponding to LME cracks.

(51) TABLE-US-00001 Critical LME elongation or Coating Critical Thickness Thickness Temperature elongation value LME Trials 1.sup.st coating (μm) 2.sup.nd coating (μm) (° C.) (mm) cracks 1 Zn 7.5 — — 750 0.6 1 (EG) 800 0.7 1 850 1.2 1 900 0.9 1 950 0.6 1 4* Al 3 ZnMg(wt. 4%) 2.5 750 4 0 800 3.8 0 850 3.6 0 900 3 0 950 3.2 0 5* Al 3 ZnMg(wt. 4%) 5 750 3.8 0 800 3.2 0 850 2.8 0 900 2.9 0 950 3.7 0 6 — — — — 750 3.2 0 800 3.8 0 850 3.2 0 900 2.9 0 950 3.1 0 *according to the present invention.

(52) Trials 4 and 5 according to the present invention show excellent resistance to LME at the same level as the bare steel, i.e. Trial 6.

Example 2: Electrochemical Behavior Test

(53) Trials 1 to 5 were prepared and subjected to an electrochemical potential test.

(54) A test consisting in measuring the electrochemical potential of the coated steel surface sheet was realized. Steel sheets and coatings were separated and dipped in a solution comprising 5% by weight of sodium chloride at pH 7. A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was also immersed into the solution. The coupling potential of the surface was measured over time. Results are shown in the following Table 2:

(55) TABLE-US-00002 Coating Electrochemical 1.sup.st Thickness 2.sup.nd Thickness potential Trials coating (μm) coating (μm) (V/SCE) 1 Zn 7.5 — — −1.05 (EG) 2 ZnMg 2.5 — — −1.05 (wt. 4%) 3 ZnMg 5 — — −1.05 (wt. 4%) 4* Al 3 ZnMg 2.5 −1.06 (wt. 4%) 5* Al 3 ZnMg 5 −1.06 (wt. 4%) *according to the present invention.

(56) All tested coatings have a similar electrochemical potential and are sacrificial for steel. Coupling potential of all Trial is under −0.78V/SCE as required, i.e. the minimum electrochemical potential for having sacrificial protection against corrosion.

Example 3: Corrosion Test

(57) Firstly, Trials 1 to 5 were scratched through the coating until the metallic substrate on a width of 1 mm.

(58) A test, consisting in submitting these Trials 1 to 5 to corrosion cycles according to the norm VDA 233-102, was then realized. Trials were put in a chamber wherein an aqueous solution of sodium chloride of 1% by weight was vaporized on trials with a rate of flow of 3 mL.Math.h.sup.−1. The temperature varied from 50 to −15° C. and the humidity rate varied from 50 to 100%. FIG. 2 illustrates one cycle corresponding to 168 hours, i.e. one week.

(59) The amount of red rust was observed around the scratch, i.e. the front face, and in the scratch with a software and by naked eyes: 0% means excellent, in other words, there is no red rust and 100% means very bad, in other words, 100% of the Trial is covered by red rust. Results are shown in the following Table 3:

(60) TABLE-US-00003 Coating Front face-Red rust (wt. %) scratch-Red rust (wt. %) 1.sup.st Thickness 2.sup.nd Thickness 1 3 6 7 1 3 6 7 Trials coating (μm) coating (μm) cycle cycles cycles cycle cycles cycles cycles cycles 1 Zn 7.5 — — 1 8 87 100 0 0 100 100 (EG) 2 ZnMg 2.5 — — 0 5 23 31 0 0 100 100 (wt. 4%) 3 ZnMg 5 — — 0 1 4 6 0 0 100 100 (wt. 4%) 4* Al 3 ZnMg 2.5 0 1 4 7 0 0 16 20 (wt. 4%) 5* Al 3 ZnMg 5 0 0 1 1 0 0 12 13 (wt. 4%) *according to the present invention.

(61) Trials 4 and 5 according to the present invention have a lower amount of red rust compared to Trials 1 to 3.