Anti-leukemic agent useful for inducing differentiation in myeloid leukemia cells
09820968 · 2017-11-21
Assignee
Inventors
- Pooja Pal (Lucknow, IN)
- Savita Lochab (Lucknow, IN)
- Jitendra Kumar Kanuajiya (Lucknow, IN)
- Sabyasachi Sanyal (Lucknow, IN)
- Arun Kumar Trivedi (Lucknow, IN)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
The present invention provides the compound Ormeloxifene [3, 4-trans-2,2-dimethyl-3-phenyl-4-p-(beta-pyrrolidinoethoxy) phenyl-7-methoxy chroman] as useful in inducing differentiation in wide range of myeloid leukemias including acute promyelocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia where block in differentiation is common feature. Ormeloxifene induced differentiation that is marked by increase in differentiation marker proteins like C/EBPα and surface proteins such as cd11b and granulocyte colony stimulating factor receptor (GCSFr). Differentiated cells having neutrophil like morphology were observed when treated with 1.0 uM to 7.5 uM ORM which clearly indicates that ORM can induce differentiation in myeloid leukemia cells. At higher doses (5 uM to 7.5 uM) there is early onset of myeloid differentiation (24 to 48 h) with reduced no. of cells which is likely due to apoptotic effects of ORM at higher does. In contrary, lower doses (1 uM) induce differentiation after longer duration (6-15 days) with quite reduced apoptotic effect.
Claims
1. A method for the treatment of a human having a myeloid leukemia, the method comprising: contacting a myeloid leukemia cell of the human with a subapoptotic concentration of ormeloxifene or salt thereof that induces differentiation in the myeloid leukemia cell, wherein the subapoptotic concentration is less than 5 μM and wherein the expression of cd11b markers in the cell is at least 10.74%.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the subapoptotic concentration is 1.0 μM.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the myeloid leukemia is an acute promyelocytic leukemia, an acute myeloid leukemia, or a chronic myelogenous leukemia.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the myeloid leukemia is an acute promyelocytic leukemia.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the myeloid leukemia is an acute myeloid leukemia.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the myeloid leukemia is a chronic myeloid leukemia.
7. The method of claim 1, the induced differentiation is marked by an increase in C/EBPα, cd11b, and granulocyte colony stimulating factor receptor (GC SFr).
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
(8) The compounds, methods, compositions and activity testing illustrated in details as follows:
(9) 1. Cell culture and plasmids: HL60, U937 and K652 cells were cultured in RPMI1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antimycotic and antibiotics. Cells were cultured in 5% CO.sub.2 humified incubator at 37° C.
(10) 2. MTT assay: Post 6 h synchronization, 1×10.sup.4 cells per well were incubated at 37° C. in 96-well plastic plates with test drugs containing 10% FBS in an environment of 5% humified CO.sub.2. After 48 hrs, cell viability was assessed by the ability of metabolically active cells to reduce tetrazolium salt (XTT) to coloured formazan compounds. The absorbance of the samples was measured with a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader at 560 nm.
(11) 3. Giemsa staining: Giemsa stain is used to differentiate nuclear and cytoplasmic morphology of blood cells. After induction with 1 uM ORM for 12 days cells were cytospun on slides at 800 rpm for 5 min and were air dried. Cells were stained with Giemsa stain (Sigma) as per manufacturer's protocol. Cells were visualized microscopically for the morphological changes.
(12) 4. NBT assay: The NBT Assay relies on the accumulation of blue black formazan precipitate. The membrane permeable, water soluble, yellow NBT is reduced to blue black formazan by O.sup.−.sub.2, which is generated by activated neutrophils/phagocytes, typically by PMA. PMA activates NADPH oxidase by enhancing protein kinase C (PKC) and thus stimulates production of ROS (reactive oxygen species). After induction with 7.5 uM ORM for 24 h and 48 hr and with 1 uM ORM for 6 days cells were incubated in NBT solution for 15 min. at 37° C. Cells were washed with PBS and were resuspended in 500 ul PBS and cytospun on slides and stained with safranin O for 1 min. Number of cells showing blue-purple colouration were counted under microscope.
(13) 5. Quantitative PCR (Real Time) and semi quantitative PCR Analysis: After induction of cells with ORM for indicated time points cells were harvested and RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent. Trizol was added to 1×10.sup.6 cells for 5 min at room temp. Lysed cells were collected in micro centrifuge tubes and shaken vigorously for 15 sec, and incubated for 3 min at RT. 200 μl of chloroform was added to each sample and incubated yet again for 5 min at RT. Cells were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4° C. Supernatant was collected in fresh tube; 1 ml isopropanol was added and incubated for 10 min at RT. Pellet was washed once with 70% ethanol and RNA concentration was quantified. Further, RNA was retro-transcribed into cDNA and subsequently used for quantitative PCR analysis on Roche Light Cycler 480 using SYBR green master mix from Applied Biosystems. Statistical analysis was performed using ΔΔCT method. Reverse transcriptase PCR was done to check the mRNA level expression of GCSFr qualitatively. RT-PCR analysis was performed using standardized PCR protocol on BioRad C1000 Thermal Cycler.
(14) 6. PBMC separation from patient sample: 10 ml peripheral blood was collected by venipuncture heparin-containing 20 ml vials. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated using density gradient centrifugation with Ficoll-Paque (1.077 g/ml). Peripheral blood was mixed in 1:1 v/v of MACS buffer and was fractionated through Ficoll-Paque. Mononuclear cells were collected from the interface, washed twice in MACS buffer and resuspended in RPMI 1640 at 37° C. in the humidified atmosphere of 5% CO.sub.2.
(15) 7. FACS analysis: Cells were treated with 1 uM ORM for 24 h and 48 h. Then they were washed with 1×PBS and resuspended in antibody solution along with their respective IgG isotype control for 15-20 min as per manufacturer's protocol. Cells were washed once with PBS and were resuspended in 500 ul of PBS. After this flow cytometry was done for PI labeled cells for cd11b and cd114 differentiation markers (BD Biosciences).
(16) Following examples are provided from the results obtained from the experiments as provided above. These should, however, not be construed to limit the scope of invention.
EXAMPLE-1
ORM Induces Growth Inhibition in Myeloid Leukemia Cells
(17) To calculate 50% growth inhibitory concentration (IC.sub.50) of ormeloxifene, various myeloid leukemia cells (U937, HL60, K562) and HEK293T as control were assayed with different doses of ormeloxifene for cell viability in MTT Assay. ORM showed IC.sub.50 of ˜7.0 uM in leukemic cells as compared to 25 uM for 293T (
EXAMPLE-2
ORM Induces Differentiation in Myeloid Leukemia Cells
(18) K562 cells were treated with 1 μM (Subapoptotic dose) and 7.5 μM ORM (Apoptotic dose) for 24 h and 48 hrs. Post 24 h and 48 h treatment, cells were analyzed in FACS-flow cytometer for the presence of myeloid differentiation marker cd11b (
(19) To further corroborate the differentiation inducing potential of ORM, K562 cells were again treated with 1.0 uM ORM and vehicle for 12 days followed by cytospin and staining with Giemsa for assessment of morphological changes. As shown in
EXAMPLE-3
Confirmation of Differentiation with Biochemical Assay
(20) In order to further confirm the ORM induced differentiation in myeloid leukemia cells, Nitro Blue Tetrazolium (NBT) reduction assay is carried out which is a biochemical assay wherein activated granulocytes can reduce NBT to insoluble purple blue colour precipitates. Further, because ORM induces apoptosis at 7.5 uM in K562 cells; we treated K562 cells with 7.5 uM for 24 h and 48 hrs and 1 uM doses for longer duration, 6 days. Cells were subjected for NBT reduction analysis. As shown in the
(21) Furthermore, ORM induces granulocytic differentiation in K562 cells, it should lead to terminal differentiation of these cells to activated neutrophils. To substantiate further the induction of granulocytic differentiation and neutrophil formation, we measured the ROS generation, which is a property of activated neutrophils by FACS flow cytometer. Significant upregulation in ROS generation upon 1 uM ORM induction in K562 cells was observed (
EXAMPLE-4
ORM Induced Differentiation in Myeloid Leukemia Cells Correlates with Enhanced Expression of Differentiation-Regulated Genes
(22) ORM induced myeloid differentiation was further demonstrated by assessing the changes in molecular markers of myeloid differentiation. Quantitative real time PCR from 1 uM ORM induced K562 cells (for 24 and 48 h) showed increased mRNA expression of cd11b (general myeloid differentiation marker (S. Koschmieder et. al.; Blood, 2007, 110(10):3695-3705), C/EBPalpha, C/EBP epsilon and GCSFr (markers of granulocytic differentiation;
EXAMPLE-5
ORM Induces Myeloid Differentiation in Primary Cells Isolated from CML Patients
(23) Significant advances made in cancer therapy during the last decade as our understanding of molecular biology and leukemogenesis evolved, suggests that leukemic cell proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation should be targeted by anti leukemic agents. Although recent studies using differentiation therapies in oncology have been successful for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with the use of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) (S. Waxman, Leukemia, 2000, 14(3):491-496), little is known about exact mechanisms of differentiation. Since. ORM profoundly induces granulocytic differentiation in K562 cells, we sought to assess if these in-vitro effects of ORM can be translated to primary cells isolated from chronic myeloid leukemia patients. 10 ml of peripheral blood upon prior consent of patients were drawn, mononuclear cells were separated using ficol-hypaq gradient centrifugation and cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS. 24 h post culture, cells were washed and plated at a density of 2×10.sup.5 cells/ml. Cells were treated with 1 uM ORM and were analyzed for expression of cd11b and cd114 surface markers after 24 and 48 hr. As shown in
(24) Taken together, these data show that the effects of ORM in myeloid cells can be translated in primary mononuclear cells isolated from CML patients.
EXAMPLE-6
ORM Induces Differentiation in HL60 and U937 Cells
(25) Profound granulocytic differentiation inducing property of ormeloxifene in K562 prompted us to investigate if ORM can also induce such differentiation in other myeloid leukemia cell lines. So we further chose HL60 and U937, a promyelocyte and myelomonocyte leukemia cell line. These cells differentiate to granulocyte lineage upon induction with all trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and represent a very good model cell line for such differentiation assays. These cells were treated with 1 uM ORM for longer duration of 12 and 15 days followed by assessment of granulocytic/neutrophil like morphology. As seen in
ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION
(26) The new use of commercially available contraceptive as an antileukemic agent has several advantages; it is well established drug having well documented toxicity and other physiologically relevant pharmacological parameters. Since it is known to induce apoptosis and now we show that it also induces myeloid differentiation at varying doses well within toxicity limits, it offers a very good direct therapeutics either alone or in combination with other antileukemic drugs.