Rear conversion lenses

Abstract

A rear conversion lens, which may include a plurality of lenses may be disposed at a side of master lenses facing an image side for varying a focal length, and may include: a first lens having a positive refractive power; a second lens having a biconcave shape; a third lens having a positive refractive power; a fourth lens having a positive refractive power; and a fifth lens having a negative refractive power. The first to fifth lenses may be sequentially arranged in a direction from an object side to the image side.

Claims

1. A rear conversion lens disposed at a side of a master lens facing an image side for varying a focal length, the rear conversion lens comprising: a first lens having a meniscus shape convex toward an image side and a positive refractive power; a second lens having a biconcave shape; a third lens having a positive refractive power, wherein an absolute value of curvature of a side surface of the third lens facing toward an object side is greater than an absolute value of curvature of an image-side surface of the third lens; a fourth lens having a positive refractive power and a biconvex shape; and a fifth lens having a negative refractive power, wherein the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth lenses are sequentially arranged in a direction from an object side to the image side, and wherein the rear conversion lens comprises a first lens group disposed at the object side and a second lens group disposed at the image side with a maximum air gap therebetween, wherein a ratio of a focal length of the first lens group with respect to an absolute value of a focal length of the rear conversion lens is between 0.35 and 0.90.

2. The rear conversion lens of claim 1, wherein the first lens has a refractive index at a d-line that is greater than 1.85.

3. The rear conversion lens of claim 1, wherein the second lens has a refractive index of greater than 1.85 at a d-line.

4. The rear conversion lens of claim 1, wherein the fifth lens has a refractive index of greater than 1.85 at a d-line.

5. The rear conversion lens of claim 1, wherein the fourth lens has a refractive index of greater than 1.65 at a d-line.

6. The rear conversion lens of claim 1, wherein a ratio of a back focal length of the rear conversion lens with respect to a maximum image height is between 0.8 and 1.2.

7. The rear conversion lens of claim 1, wherein the focal length of the first lens group with respect to a focal length of the second lens group is between −2.1 and −1.1.

8. The rear conversion lenses of claim 1, wherein the second lens and the third lens are cemented together as a doublet lens.

9. The rear conversion lenses of claim 1, wherein at least one of the first lens, the fourth lens, and the fifth lens comprises at least one aspheric surface.

10. A rear conversion lens including a plurality of lenses, the rear conversion lens being disposed at a side of one or more master lenses facing an image side for varying a focal length, the rear conversion lens comprising: a first lens having a positive refractive power, a second lens having a negative refractive power, a third lens having a positive refractive power, a fourth lens having a positive refractive power, and a fifth lens having a negative refractive power, wherein the first to fifth lenses are sequentially arranged in a direction from an object side to the image side, and wherein N1>1.85, N2>1.85, and N5>1.85, wherein N1 denotes a refractive index of the first lens at a d-line, N2 denotes a refractive index of the second lens at the d-line, and N5 denotes a refractive index of the fifth lens at the d-line.

11. The rear conversion lenses of claim 10, wherein N4<1.65, wherein N4 denotes a refractive index of the fourth lens at the d-line.

12. The rear conversion lenses of claim 10, wherein 0.8<fbRC/Y<1.2, wherein fbRC denotes a back focal length of the rear conversion lenses at a predetermined magnification and Y denotes a maximum image height.

13. The rear conversion lens of claim 10, wherein the rear conversion lenses are divided into a first lens group disposed at the object side and a second lens group disposed at the image side with a maximum air gap therebetween, and wherein 0.35<f1/|fRC|<0.90, wherein f1 denotes a focal length of the first lens group and fRC denotes a focal length of the rear conversion lenses.

14. The rear conversion lens of claim 13, wherein −2.1<f1/f2<−1.1, wherein f2 denotes a focal length of the second lens group.

15. The rear conversion lens of claim 10, wherein the second lens and the third lens are cemented together as a doublet lens.

16. The rear conversion lens of claim 10, wherein at least one of the first lens, the fourth lens, and the fifth lens comprises at least one aspheric surface.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) These and/or other aspects will become apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

(2) FIG. 1 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to a first embodiment;

(3) FIG. 2 illustrates master lenses;

(4) FIG. 3 illustrates spherical aberration, astigmatic field curvatures, and distortion of the master lenses illustrated in FIG. 2;

(5) FIG. 4 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which the master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the first embodiment;

(6) FIG. 5 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to a second embodiment;

(7) FIG. 6 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the second embodiment;

(8) FIG. 7 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to a third embodiment;

(9) FIG. 8 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the third embodiment;

(10) FIG. 9 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to a fourth embodiment;

(11) FIG. 10 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the fourth embodiment;

(12) FIG. 11 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to a fifth embodiment;

(13) FIG. 12 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the fifth embodiment;

(14) FIG. 13 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to a sixth embodiment;

(15) FIG. 14 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the sixth embodiment;

(16) FIG. 15 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to a seventh embodiment;

(17) FIG. 16 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the seventh embodiment;

(18) FIG. 17 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to an eighth embodiment;

(19) FIG. 18 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the eighth embodiment;

(20) FIG. 19 illustrates rear conversion lenses according to a ninth embodiment;

(21) FIG. 20 illustrates aberrations of a lens system in which master lenses ML are combined with the rear conversion lenses of the ninth embodiment; and

(22) FIG. 21 illustrates a relationship between master lenses and rear conversion lenses.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(23) Reference will now be made in detail to illustrative embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout. In this regard, the present illustrative embodiments may have different forms and should not be construed as being limited to the descriptions set forth herein. Accordingly, the illustrative embodiments are merely described below, by referring to the figures, to explain aspects. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. Expressions such as “at least one of,” when preceding a list of elements, modify the entire list of elements and do not modify the individual elements of the list.

(24) Rear conversion lenses will now be described according to embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.

(25) FIG. 1 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to an embodiment.

(26) The rear conversion lenses RL may be disposed at an image side I of a master lenses ML provided in a main body of a photographing device. In the following description, the term “image side I” may refer to a side of an image plane on which an image will be formed, and the term “object side O” may refer to a side of an object to be photographed. The rear conversion lenses RL may be detachably attached to the master lenses ML and may vary a total focal length. For example, the rear conversion lenses RL may increase the total focal length. For example, the rear conversion lenses RL may increase the focal length of the master lenses ML by a factor of 1.4. However, the extent to which the rear conversion lenses RL increases the focal length of the master lenses ML is not limited thereto.

(27) The rear conversion lenses RL of the embodiment may be applied to interchangeable lens cameras having a short flange back such as mirrorless cameras. The term “flange back” refers to the distance from a lens mount surface to an image plane.

(28) The rear conversion lenses RL may include a first lens L1 having a positive refractive power, a second lens L2 having a negative refractive power, a third lens L3 having a positive refractive power, a fourth lens L4 having a positive refractive power, and a fifth lens L5 having a negative refractive power. The first to fifth lenses L1 to L5 may be sequentially arranged in a direction from the object side O to the image side I.

(29) The first lens L1 may have a meniscus shape convex toward the image side I.

(30) For example, the second lens L2 may be a biconcave lens.

(31) The absolute value of the curvature of an object-side surface of the third lens L3 may be greater than the absolute value of the curvature of an image-side surface of the third lens L3. For example, the third lens L3 may have a meniscus shape convex toward the object side O. In addition, the third lens L3 may be a biconvex lens.

(32) For example, the fourth lens L4 may be a biconvex lens.

(33) FIG. 2 illustrates master lenses ML. Design data of the master lenses ML are as follows. In the following design data, EFL denotes a focal length, BFL denotes a back focal length, RDY denotes a radius of curvature, THI denotes a lens thickness or a lens interval, Nd denotes a refractive index, and Vd refers to an Abbe number.

(34) In this example, the master lenses have the following values: EFL=291.965, BFL=1.000, FNO=2.88, Half angle of view=4.18 deg, and Table 1 shows corresponding values for RDY, THI, Nd, and Vd.

(35) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Lens surfaces RDY THI Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 46.0 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 61.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 28.1 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 31.8 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 61.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 15.8 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 26.1 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 14.7 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 39.4 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 20.9 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 29.8 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 14.7 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 25.6 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 33.5 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 41.8 28 Infinity 60.284 29 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 41.8 30 Infinity 1.000

(36) The design data of the master lenses ML shown in Table 1 are exemplary data, and are not limited thereto. In general, rear conversion lenses which have a negative lens group such as telephoto lenses may be added to mater lenses whose aberrations are already corrected, thereby resulting in a negative Petzval sum. Therefore, adjustment of the refractive index of each of the rear conversion lenses RL may be important for correcting the Petzval sum. In addition, the rear conversion lenses RL may be designed for use in a mirrorless camera having a relatively short flange back compared to a single-lens reflex camera having a mirror. If the focal length of the master lenses ML is increased, for example, by a factor of 1.4, the image distance of the rear conversion lenses RL may be decreased because of a short flange back, and off-axis rays may be refracted at relatively large angles compared to the case of forming the same image circle. Therefore, it may be more difficult to design a mirrorless camera using the rear conversion lenses RL than to design a single-lens reflex camera having a mirror.

(37) The first lens L1 may satisfy Expression 1 below:
N1>1.85  (1)

(38) where N1 denotes the refractive index of the first lens L1 at a d-line. A d-line is a spectral absorption line which has a well defined wavelength and can be used to characterize the refractive index of an optical material. For example, the d-line may be 587.5618 nm.

(39) When the first lens L1 has a refractive index described in Expression 1, the rear conversion lenses RL may be applied to a photographing device having a short flange back.

(40) To cope with a short flange back, the first lens L1 being a positive lens may be combined with a negative lens disposed at an image side of the first lens L1 with an air gap therebetween, so as to form a kind of telephoto lens group and thus to move the rear principal point of the rear conversion lenses RL toward the object side O. Then, even though the flange back is short, the image distance of the rear conversion lenses RL may be increased a little bit, and thus the refraction angle of off-axis rays may be decreased. Since the first lens L1 has a relatively high refractive power, aberrations, such as a spherical aberration or a coma aberration, may be reduced using the high refractive index of the first lens L1.

(41) The second lens L2 may satisfy Expression 2 below:
N2>1.85  (2)

(42) where N2 denotes the refractive index of the second lens L2 at the d-line.

(43) The fifth lens L5 may satisfy Expression 3 below:
N5>1.85  (3)

(44) where N5 denotes the refractive index of the fifth lens L5 at the d-line.

(45) For example, if each of the second lens L2 and the fifth lens L5 includes or is formed from a material having a refractive index of 1.85 or greater, the Petzval sum may be easily corrected. Since each of the second lens L2 and the fifth lens L5 is a negative lens, if the second lens L2 and the fifth lens L5 have high refractive indexes, a negative value of the Petzval sum may be reduced. not have a negative value That is, the absolute value of the Petzval sum may be reduced using the high refractive indexes of the second lens L2 and the third lens L3.

(46) If each of the first lens L1, the second lens L2, and the fifth lens L5 has a refractive index of 2 or greater, the degree of freedom in designing lenses for a short flange back may be increased.

(47) The fourth lens L4 may satisfy Expression 4 below:
N4<1.65  (4)

(48) where N4 denotes the refractive index of the fourth lens L4 at the d-line.

(49) Expression 4 describes the refractive index of the fourth lens L4. Since each of the first lens L1, the second lens L2, and the fifth lens L5 includes material having a relatively high refractive index, the fourth lens L4 being a positive lens may include or be formed from a material having a relatively low refractive index according to a principal of Petzval sum correction. However, the refractive index of the fourth lens L4 may be within the range described in Expression 4 for the balance with the other lenses.

(50) The rear conversion lenses RL may satisfy Expression 5 below:
0.8<fbRC/Y<1.2  (5)

(51) where fbRC denotes the back focal length of the rear conversion lenses RL at a predetermined magnification, and Y denotes a maximum image height.

(52) Expression 5 describes the ratio of the back focal length to the maximum image height of the rear conversion lenses RL. If fbRC/Y is greater than the upper limit in Expression 5, that is, the back focal length of the rear conversion lenses RL is relatively long, the size of the rear conversion lenses RL may increase when the rear conversion lenses RL are applied to a photographing device having a short flange back. Interchangeable lenses for interchangeable lens cameras have lens interchange mounts and may be designed according to the flange backs of the interchangeable lens cameras. Therefore, interchange lenses for a short flange back may have a short distance between a mount surface and an image surface. In other words, the object distance of the rear conversion lenses RL is short. It is difficult to maintain an intended or desired magnification if the back focal length of the rear conversion lenses RL is excessively long relative to the short object distance of the rear conversion lenses RL.

(53) If fbRC/Y is smaller than the lower limit in Expression 5, that is, if the back focal length of the rear conversion lenses RL is short, the rear principal point of the rear conversion lenses RL does not move to the object side O. Thus, it difficult to design the rear conversion lenses RL in the case where the image distance of the rear conversion lenses RL is short as the refraction angles of off-axis rays are increased.

(54) The rear conversion lenses RL may be divided into a first lens group LG1 disposed at the object side O and a second lens group LG2 disposed at the image side I. A maximum air gap may be formed between the first and second lens groups LG1 and LG2. The rear conversion lenses RL may satisfy Expression 6 below:
0.35<f1/|fRC|<0.90  (6)
where f1 denotes the focal length of the first lens group LG1 and fRC denotes the focal length of the rear conversion lenses RL.

(55) Expression 6 describes the ratio of the focal length of the first lens group LG1 to the absolute value of the focal length of the rear conversion lenses RL when the rear conversion lenses RL are divided into the first lens group LG1 and the second lens group LG2 with the maximum air gap therebetween. For example, referring to FIG. 1, the gap between the first lens L1 and the second lens L2 may be the maximum air gap. The first lens group LG1 may include the first lens L1, and the second lens group LG2 may include the second lens L2, the third lens L3, fourth lens L4, and the fifth lens L5. The reference number LG1 indicating the first lens group and the reference number LG2 indicating the second lens group are only shown in FIG. 1.

(56) Principal points of the rear conversion lenses RL may be adjusted according to a reference short flange back by disposing the second lens group LG2 having a negative total refractive power at the image side I of the first lens L1 with an air gap being formed between the first lens L1 and the second lens group LG2.

(57) In this case, due to mechanical conditions such as mounting conditions of the rear conversion lenses RL, if the rear conversion lenses RL have almost no air gap and a short length, the shifting of the principal points of the rear conversion lenses RL may be related with the entrance pupil of the rear conversion lenses RL.

(58) In addition, when rays condensed by the first lens group LG1 are incident on a concave surface of the second lens L2 being a negative lens disposed at a side of the first lens group LG1 with an air gap therebetween, spherical aberration and coma may be corrected by adjusting the incident height of the rays.

(59) If f1/|fRC| is greater than the upper limit in Expression 6, in other words, when the focal length of the first lens group LG1 is long and the power of the first lens group LG1 is low, aberrations of the first lens group LG1 may be reduced as a result. However, the effect of reducing aberrations by the concave surface of the second lens L2 is lowered, thereby causing the overall aberration correction to be insufficient. Furthermore, the rear principal point of the rear conversion lenses RL may move toward the image side I, thereby decreasing the image distance of the rear conversion lenses RL and increasing the refraction angles of off-axis rays, and making it difficult to design the rear conversion lenses RL.

(60) If f1/|fRC| is less than the lower limit in Expression 6, in other words when the focal length of the first lens group LG1 is short, the rear principal point of the rear conversion lenses RL moves toward the object side O. Thus, as the image distance of the rear conversion lenses RL increases, the refraction angles of off-axis rays may decrease and the aberrations of the first lens group LG1 may increase.

(61) The rear conversion lenses RL may satisfy Expression 7 below:
−2.1<f1/f2<−1.1  (7)
where f1 denotes the focal length of the first lens group LG1, and f2 denotes the focal length of the second lens group LG2.

(62) Expression 7 describes the ratio of the focal length of the first lens group LG1 to the focal length of the second lens group LG2 when the rear conversion lenses RL are divided into the first lens group LG1 and the second lens group LG2 with the maximum air gap therebetween.

(63) If f1/f2 is greater than the upper limit in Expression 7, the focal length of the second lens group LG2 increases in a negative direction. That is, if the negative refractive power of the second lens group LG2 decreases, the rear principal point of the rear conversion lenses RL may move to the object side O. However, it may be required to decrease the refractive power of the first lens group LG1 together with the refractive power of the second lens group LG2 so as to maintain the magnification and rear principal point of the rear conversion lenses RL. Accordingly, it may be difficult to reduce the aberrations of the rear conversion lenses RL through destructive interference between aberrations of the first and second lens groups LG1 and LG2.

(64) If f1/f2 is less than the lower limit in Expression 7, in other words, when the negative focal length of the second lens group LG2 is shortened, the negative refractive power of the second lens group LG2 increases and the rear principal point of the rear conversion lenses RL moves to the image side I, the refractive angles of off-axis rays are increased. In addition, if the negative refractive power of the second lens group LG2 excessively increases, it may be difficult to properly correct the Petzval sum even though the rear conversion lenses RL satisfy Expressions 3 and 4.

(65) If the rear conversion lenses RL has an aspheric surface, positive distortion caused by a negative refractive power at the image side of the master lenses ML may be corrected. The aspheric surface may be an aspheric surface formed on glass by molding, and the material from which it is formed (e.g., glass) may have a low transition point. However, the aspheric surface may not be an aspheric surface of a doublet lens because doublet lenses have no refractive index difference between negative and positive lenses and no degree of freedom in selection of an Abbe number for correcting chromatic aberrations.

(66) For example, the second lens L2 and the third lens L3 may be cemented or otherwise bonded or secured together as a doublet lens. One of the first lens L1, the fourth lens L4, and the fifth lens L5 may have an aspheric surface.

(67) The rear conversion lenses RL of the embodiment may be applied to a short flange back system for cameras, camcorders, etc.

(68) In the description of the rear conversion lenses RL of the embodiment, the term “aspheric” or “aspheric surface” has the following definition.

(69) When an optical axis is set as an x-axis, a direction perpendicular to the optical axis is set as a y-axis, and the propagation direction of rays is denoted as a positive direction, an aspheric surface of a lens may be defined by Expression 8. In Expression 8, x denotes a distance measured from the vertex of the lens in the direction of the optical axis of the lens, y denotes a distance measured from the optical axis in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis, K denotes a conic constant, a, b, c, and d denote aspheric coefficients, and c denotes the reciprocal (1/R) of the radius of curvature at the vertex of the lens.

(70) $\begin{array}{cc}x=\frac{{\mathrm{Cy}}^2}{1+\sqrt{1-\left(K+1\right)C^2{y}^2}}+{\mathrm{ay}}^4+{\mathrm{by}}^6+{\mathrm{cy}}^8+{\mathrm{dy}}^{10}& \left(8\right)\end{array}$

(71) Variously designed rear conversion lenses may be provided according to numeral embodiments as described below. In the following explanation, EFL denotes a total focal length in millimeters (mm), BFL denotes a back focal length, FNO denotes an F number, and w denotes a half angle of view in degrees. The EFL, FNO, and w may be assigned values in which the rear conversion lenses of the embodiments are combined with the master lenses ML shown in FIG. 2. However, the master lenses ML are not limited to those shown in FIG. 2. That is, the master lenses ML may be varied.

(72) RDY denotes a radius of curvature, THI denotes a lens thickness or a lens interval, Nd denotes a refractive index, and Vd denotes an Abbe number. As shown in each of the drawings of the embodiments, at least one filter P may be disposed at a position closest to an image side I. The filter P may include one of a low pass filter, an infrared (IR)-cut filter, and a cover glass. However, the rear conversion lenses may not include any filter. In the drawings, Img denotes an image plane or an image sensor.

First Embodiment

(73) FIG. 1 illustrates the rear conversion lenses RL according to a first numeral embodiment, and design data for the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the first embodiment are shown below. In Table 2, lens surfaces of the master lenses ML are sequentially numbered in a direction from the object side O to the image side I, and as shown in Table 2 and FIG. 1, lens surfaces of the rear conversion lenses RL are sequentially numbered with S1, S2, . . . , Sn (where n denotes a natural number) in a direction from the object side O to the image side I. In the following description, design data of the embodiments are shown in the same manner. For example, the Table 2 shows values for RDY, THI, Nd, and Vd, where EFL=408.738, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, w=3.00 deg, Magnification=1.40

(74) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Lens surfaces RDY THI Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.075 S1 −112.450 3.080 2.10420 17.0 S2 −45.376 4.168 S3 −31.019 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 29.455 5.345 1.71736 29.5 S5 338.930 0.100 S6 53.397 9.671 1.58144 40.9 S7 −32.800 0.100 S8 −90.210 1.400 2.00100 29.1 S9 417.845 20.239  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(75) FIG. 3 illustrates spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of the master lenses illustrated in FIG. 2.

(76) FIG. 4 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the first embodiment. The astigmatic field curves include a tangential field curvature T and a sagittal field curvature S.

Second Embodiment

(77) FIG. 5 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to a second numeral embodiment, and design data for master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the second embodiment are shown below.

(78) EFL=408.738, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, w=3.045 deg, Magnification=1.4

(79) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Lens surfaces RDY THI Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.076 S1 −111.207 3.134 2.10420 17.0 S2 −44.202 4.199 S3 −29.475 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 23.932 6.765 1.76182 26.6 S5 313.274 0.100 S6 63.960 9.935 1.58320 59.2 S7 −37.210 0.100 S8 −320.861 1.400 2.00100 29.1 S9 246.750 20.243  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(80) Table 4 below shows aspheric coefficients in the second embodiment.

(81) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Lens surfaces K a b c S7 −1.0000 −7.52752e−006 2.32905e−010 −1.80779e−011

(82) FIG. 6 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the second embodiment.

Third Embodiment

(83) FIG. 7 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to a third numeral embodiment, and design data for master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the third embodiment are shown below.

(84) EFL=408.737, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, w=2.97 deg, Magnification=1.4

(85) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Lens surfaces RDY THI Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.083 S1 −118.015 3.408 2.00178 19.3 S2 −39.014 3.108 S3 −32.870 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 26.058 5.683 1.80518 25.5 S5 204.276 0.100 S6 54.464 9.824 1.57501 41.5 S7 −28.153 0.100 S8 −48.242 1.400 2.00100 29.1 S9 4816.097 20.224  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(86) Table 6 below shows aspheric coefficients in the third embodiment.

(87) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Lens surfaces K a b c S2 −1.0000 −1.04196e−007 1.31335e−009 3.74857e−012

(88) FIG. 8 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the third embodiment.

Fourth Embodiment

(89) FIG. 9 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to a fourth numeral embodiment, and design data for master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the fourth embodiment are shown below.

(90) Table 7 below lists values for R, TH, Nd, and Vd, where EFL=408.738, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, Half angle of view=3.04 deg, Magnification=1.4.

(91) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Lens surfaces R TH Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.051 S1 −110.800 3.106 2.10420 17.0 S2 −44.645 4.819 S3 −27.342 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 28.434 6.545 1.72825 28.3 S5 −339.284 0.100 S6 185.368 9.374 1.51742 52.2 S7 −26.442 0.100 S8 −35.402 1.400 2.00178 19.3 S9 −46.669 20.288  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(92) Table 8 below shows aspheric coefficients in the fourth embodiment.

(93) TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Lens surfaces K a b c d S8 −1.0000 8.25968e−007 1.00264e−009 −1.93563e−012 2.79930e−014

(94) FIG. 10 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the fourth embodiment.

Fifth Embodiment

(95) FIG. 11 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to a fifth numeral embodiment, and design data for master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the fifth embodiment are shown below.

(96) EFL=408.738, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, w=3.04 deg, Magnification=1.4

(97) TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Lens surfaces R TH Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.053 S1 −111.152 3.109 2.10420 17.0 S2 −44.650 4.697 S3 −28.141 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 29.200 4.842 1.78472 25.7 S5 112.802 0.100 S6 62.802 10.816 1.54814 45.8 S7 −26.420 0.100 S8 −35.595 1.400 2.00178 19.3 S9 −49.975 20.285  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(98) Table 10 below shows aspheric coefficients in the fifth embodiment.

(99) TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Lens surfaces K a b c S9 −1.0000 −2.99490e−006 −1.29634e−009

(100) FIG. 12 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the fifth embodiment.

Sixth Embodiment

(101) FIG. 13 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to a sixth numeral embodiment, and design data for master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the sixth embodiment are shown below.

(102) Table 11 lists values for R, TH, Nd, and Vd, where EFL=408.738, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, w=3.04 deg, Magnification=1.4.

(103) TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Lens surfaces R TH Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.073 S1 −111.337 2.981 2.10420 17.0 S2 −47.189 4.675 S3 −31.442 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 24.761 6.317 1.78470 26.3 S5 244.995 0.100 S6 71.305 8.732 1.48749 70.4 S7 −34.150 0.100 S8 −52.661 1.400 1.88202 37.2 S9 −71.304 20.249  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(104) Table 12 below shows aspheric coefficients in the sixth embodiment.

(105) TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Lens surfaces K a b c S7 −1.0000 2.87992e−006 8.89594e−010 9.50189e−012

(106) FIG. 14 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the sixth embodiment.

Seventh Embodiment

(107) FIG. 15 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to a seventh numeral embodiment, and design data for master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the seventh embodiment are shown below.

(108) Table 13 lists values for RDY, THI, Nd, and Vd, where EFL=408.738, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, w=3.04 deg, Magnification=1.4

(109) TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Lens surfaces RDY THI Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14 Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.076 S1 −111.470 2.963 2.10420 17.0 S2 −47.592 4.596 S3 −32.277 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 25.390 6.503 1.76182 26.5 S5 1314.241 0.100 S6 81.168 8.349 1.48749 70.4 S7 −34.193 0.100 S8 −64.039 1.400 1.88202 37.2 S9 −116.896 20.243  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(110) Table 14 below shows aspheric coefficients in the seventh embodiment.

(111) TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Lens surfaces K a b c S9 −1.0000 −3.52898e−006 −5.90816e−010 −1.00491e−011

(112) FIG. 16 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the seventh embodiment.

Eighth Embodiment

(113) FIG. 17 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to an eighth numeral embodiment, and design data for master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the eighth embodiment are shown below.

(114) Table 15 lists RDY, THI, Nd, and Vd values where EFL=408.739, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, w=3.00 deg, Magnification=1.4

(115) TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Lens surfaces RDY THI Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.072 S1 −117.205 3.384 2.00272 19.3 S2 −40.754 3.968 S3 −27.618 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 28.573 5.305 1.84666 23.8 S5 170.255 0.100 S6 61.484 10.217 1.51742 52.2 S7 −27.786 0.100 S8 −77.898 1.400 2.00100 29.1 S9 −409.055 20.246  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(116) FIG. 18 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the eighth embodiment.

Ninth Embodiment

(117) FIG. 19 illustrates rear conversion lenses RL according to a ninth numeral embodiment, and design data for master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL of the ninth embodiment are shown below.

(118) Table 16 lists RDY, THI, Nd, and Vd values, where EFL=408.737, BFL=1.000, FNO=4.03, w=3.00 deg, Magnification=1.4

(119) TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Lens surfaces RDY THI Nd Vd 1 207.797 10.730 1.48749 70.4 2 −1331.507 0.300 3 98.708 21.000 1.43875 94.9 4 −262.808 0.100 5 −288.092 3.500 1.78590 43.9 6 5388.297 28.710 7 84.103 3.000 1.74330 49.2 8 46.358 0.207 9 46.360 15.890 1.43875 94.9 10 366.953 15.250 11 490.634 6.000 1.80518 25.5 12 −106.559 2.000 1.88300 40.8 13 81.365 41.750 14(ST) Infinity 4.500 15 −277.940 4.100 1.84666 23.8 16 −56.241 1.800 1.60311 60.7 17 148.641 3.700 18 −158.269 1.800 1.80610 33.3 19 123.928 3.400 20 209.019 6.730 1.80420 46.5 21 −39.192 1.800 1.84666 23.8 22 −116.747 12.750 23 253.967 5.260 1.88100 40.1 24 −89.594 1.110 25 −84.359 1.500 1.51742 52.2 26 1457.940 20.000 27 Infinity 1.500 1.51680 64.2 28 Infinity 33.047 S1 −121.371 3.557 1.92286 20.9 S2 −38.661 3.832 S3 −26.933 1.500 2.00100 29.1 S4 27.853 5.208 1.92286 20.9 S5 120.278 0.327 S6 62.137 10.392 1.48749 70.4 S7 −27.221 0.100 S8 −78.846 1.400 2.00100 29.1 S9 −206.886 20.289  S10 Infinity 2.000 1.51680 64.2  S11 Infinity 1.000

(120) FIG. 20 illustrates longitudinal spherical aberration, astigmatic field curves, and distortion of a lens system (constituted by the master lenses ML and the rear conversion lenses RL) of the ninth embodiment.

(121) Table 17 (below) shows that the rear conversion lenses RL of the first to ninth embodiments satisfy Expressions 1 to 7.

(122) TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Emodiments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 fRC −89.700 −108.257 −78.784 −136.381 −123.851 −109.478 −102.526 −99.581 −107.940 fbRC 22.558 22.562 22.542 22.607 22.604 22.568 22.562 22.564 22.608 f1 67.274 64.847 56.948 66.089 65.967 72.408 73.426 60.958 60.231 f2 −38.081 −41.472 −31.992 −47.281 −44.999 −44.603 −43.321 −38.160 −39.590 f2 38.081 −41.472 −31.992 −47.281 −44.999 −44.603 −43.321 −38.160 −39.590 Y 21.600 21.600 21.600 21.600 21.600 21.600 21.600 21.600 21.600 β 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 fbRC/Y 1.044 1.045 1.044 1.047 1.046 1.045 1.045 1.045 1.047 f1/|fRC| 0.750 0.599 0.723 0.485 0.533 0.661 0.716 0.612 0.558 f1/f2 −1.767 −1.564 −1.780 −1.398 −1.466 −1.623 −1.695 −1.597 −1.521

(123) FIG. 21 illustrates a camera having a relatively short flange back and a camera having a relatively long flange back, each camera including master lenses and rear conversion lenses attached to a camera body. In FIG. 21, lenses are simply illustrated for clarity of description. The refraction angle of rays in the camera having a relatively short flange back is larger than in the camera having a relatively long flange back. Therefore, since the refraction angle of rays is larger in the camera having a relatively short flange back than the camera having a relatively long flange back even though the same image sensor is used, it may be more difficult to design the rear conversion lenses of the camera having a relatively short flange back than to design the rear conversion lenses of the camera having a relatively long flange back. Therefore, this may be considered when adjusting the refractive index of each of the rear conversion lenses of the embodiments.

(124) For example, the rear conversion lenses of the embodiments may be applied to interchangeable lens cameras such as single-lens reflex cameras, and to mirrorless cameras having a short flange back.

(125) It should be understood that the rear conversion lenses described according to embodiments should be considered in a descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation. Descriptions of features or aspects within each embodiment should typically be considered as available for other similar features or aspects in other embodiments.

(126) While one or more embodiments have been described with reference to the figures, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope as defined by the following claims.