DEHYDROGENATION OF ALKANES TO ALKENES
20170247302 · 2017-08-31
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C07C2527/047
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Y02P20/52
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
C07C5/46
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07C2521/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07C5/46
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07C2527/049
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C07C2527/043
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
Process for dehydrogenation of alkanesor alkylbenzenes by using metal sulfide catalyst under the presence of small amounts of hydrogen sulfide.
Claims
1. Process for the dehydrogenation of alkanes, alkenes or alkylbenzenes to the corresponding unsaturated chemical products and hydrogen (H.sub.2) comprising contacting the alkane, alkene or alkylbenzene with a metallic sulfide (MeS) catalyst in which the dehydrogenation is conducted in one or more dehydrogenation reactors without using steam (H.sub.2O) as carrier gas for the alkanes, alkenes or alkylbenzenes, and in the presence of hydrogen sulfide (H.sub.2S) without formation of H.sub.2S as a reaction product.
2. Process according to claim 1 in which the molar ratio of hydrogen sulfide to alkanes, alkenes or alkylbenzene is between 0.01 and 0.2.
3. Process according to claim 1 in which the molar ratio of hydrogen sulfide (H.sub.2S) to hydrogen (H.sub.2) is between 0.01 and 0.2.
4. Process according to claim 3 in which the molar ratio of hydrogen sulfide (H.sub.2S) to hydrogen (H.sub.2) is 0.05-0.06.
5. Process according to claim 1, in which the metal (Me) of the metallic sulfide (MeS) is selected from Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, Cu, Mo, W and combinations thereof.
6. Process according to claim 1, in which the process is conducted at temperatures in the range 500-700° C.
7. Process according to claim 1, in which the alkane is selected from ethane, propane, butane, pentane and combinations thereof.
8. Process according to claim 1, wherein the alkene is selected from ethylene, propylene, butene, pentene and combinations thereof.
9. Process according to claim 1, in which the alkylbenzene is ethylbenzene and the corresponding unsaturated chemical product is styrene.
10. Process according to claim 1, in which unreacted alkanes, alkenes, alkylbenzenes and by-products are recycled to the one or more dehydrogenation reactors.
11. Process according to claim 10 in which the unreacted alkanes, alkylbenzenes and by-products include methane, ethane, ethylbenzenes, benzene, toluene, and combinations thereof.
12. Process according to claim 1, in which benzene, toluene, or combinations of both, are used as carrier gas.
13. Process according to claim 1, in which methane, ethane, or combinations of both, are used as carrier gas.
14. Process according to claim 1, in which the dehydrogenation is conducted in adiabatic reactors with a reheating step and selective oxidation of hydrogen produced in the process in between the reactors.
15. Process according to claim 1, in which off-gas containing H.sub.2 and CH.sub.4 produced in the process is used as carrier gas and selective oxidation of hydrogen is conducted upstream the first dehydrogenation reactor.
Description
[0048] The accompanying
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
EXAMPLE 1
Invention
Dehydrogenation of Ethylbenzene
[0054] The catalyst used consisted of CoMo oxides supported on a MgAl.sub.2O.sub.4 carrier the catalyst was sulfidized before use, i.e. presulfidized. The amount loaded in the reactor was 10.Math.g catalyst mixed with 10.Math.g inert material also consisting of MgAl.sub.2O.sub.4 (spinel) carrier.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Ethyl Styrene Styrene Temp. benzene Styrene H.sub.2 H.sub.2S conv. select. [° C.] [vol %] [vol %] [vol %] [vol %] [%] [%] 550 4.39 1.81 4.64 0.31 28.8 90.9 550 7.42 2.19 5.01 0.31 22.5 94.8 550 2.97 0.88 3.71 0.31 22.8 94.2 575 2.61 1.10 3.92 0.31 29.1 95.2 575 2.47 1.00 3.82 0.31 28.4 95.2 575 2.54 0.94 3.77 0.31 26. 95.30 575 4.26 1.31 4.10 0.31 23.3 95.2 600 3.57 2.04 4.82 0.31 35.3 92.9 600 3.48 1.85 4.63 0.31 33.7 92.8 600 3.65 1.92 4.70 0.31 33.51 93.0 600 5.77 2.96 5.74 0.31 36.0 97.0 600 3.55 1.58 4.36 0.31 30.3 95.6 600 3.41 1.43 4.21 0.31 29.1 95.4
[0055] The loading zone in the reactor was 635 mm to 244 mm from the top flange. The total flow has been around 48 Nl/h throughout the testing period for ethylbenzene dehydrogenation. The pressure was 3 barg, which is the minimum pressure the experiment could be conducted using the present setup. The nonselective products were benzene, toluene, methane, ethane and ethylene. Nitrogen was used as carrier gas. Hydrogen sulfide was added from a hydrogen sulfide/hydrogen mixture thereby adding hydrogen. The surplus of hydrogen may give rise to increased cracking besides limiting the conversion which is relatively close to the calculated equilibrium value.
[0056] Only small amounts of H.sub.2S as measured by the molar (vol.) ratio H.sub.2S/H.sub.2 are used and in the absence of steam. As shown in Table 1, high styrene conversions (close to equilibrium) and high styrene selectivity are obtained with no carbon formation on the catalyst. Particular high conversion and selectivity are obtained at higher temperatures, which is expected since the reaction is endothermic, yet surprisingly high conversion and selectivity where the H.sub.2S/H.sub.2 value is particularly in the range 0.05-0.06, specifically here 0.054 (antepenultimate row of Table 1). The molar ratio of hydrogen sulfide (H.sub.2S) to hydrogen (H.sub.2) is the initial molar ratio and not after the reaction has been performed.
EXAMPLE 2
Invention
Dehydrogenation of Propane
[0057] The dehydrogenation of propane was conducted on the same catalyst as the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene in Example 1. The conditions with respect to pressure and nitrogen as diluent as well as addition of a hydrogen hydrogen sulfide mixture for keeping the catalyst sulfided were the same. The by-products found were methane, ethane and ethylene. No mercaptanes were found. As shown in Table 2 conversions close to equilibrium and high selectivity are obtainable. No carbon formation on the catalyst was detected.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Propane Propene Temp. Propene Propane H.sub.2 H.sub.2S conversion selectivity [° C.] [vol %] [vol %] [vol %] [vol %] [%] [%] 550 1.41 4.14 2.20 0.24 25.2 95.3 575 1.43 4.19 2.20 0.24 25.0 92.1 550 0.56 5.60 2.20 0.24 9.00 94.1 550 0.46 5.74 2.20 0.24 7.38 93.6
EXAMPLE 3
Prior Art
Classic Styrene Process
[0058] Styrene is produced in very large quantities worldwide and used in a variety of products. The dominant process today is based on catalytic dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene using an iron based catalyst.
[0059]
[0060] In
[0061] The crude styrene stream is sent to the distillation section 60, where styrene product 10 is obtained. A first column (not shown) separates benzene/toluene from ethylbenzene/styrene and a second column (not shown) separates ethylbenzene from styrene. Final purification of the styrene and benzene/toluene separation has not been included in the process comparisons as they are assumed identical in all cases.
[0062] The conversion of ethylbenzene to styrene has been fixed to 70% by varying the steam content resulting in a steam to carbon ratio of around 1 or a steam to oil weight ratio of around 1.4 as it is usually expressed in the styrene industry.
[0063] The loss of ethylbenzene due to side reactions where ethylbenzene is respectively converted to benzene, ethylene and to toluene, methane is calculated by transforming 2% of the styrene into ethylene and benzene and 3% into toluene and methane.
[0064] All the calculations have been made with a production of 100 MT per hour of styrene leaving the ethylbenzene/styrene splitter column of the second distillation column.
[0065] The result of the pinch analysis of the process is shown in Table 3. The hot utility is 307 MW (Relative hot utility=100).
EXAMPLE 4
Invention
New Styrene Process
[0066] In this example, the other two functions of steam, namely dilution of reaction mixture and heat carrier, are performed by recycling a benzene/toluene mixture, i.e. a benzene/toluene mixture is used as carrier gas. This stream can be obtained by recycle from the product separation columns, i.e. the first distillation column.
[0067] The process is illustrated by
[0068] Recycled benzene/toluene stream 2 is added instead of steam to fresh and recycled ethylbenzene 1 together with enough H.sub.2S in stream 11 to keep the catalyst sulfide throughout the reactor train according to the equilibrium
9Co+8H.sub.2S=Co.sub.9S.sub.8+8H.sub.2
[0069] For which the equilibrium constant can be estimated from K.sub.p=0.004907*exp(98105/T).
[0070] The feed to the first reactor comprises therefore ethylbenzene, a small amount of H.sub.2S and benzene/toluene as carrier gas. Hydrogen sulfide is recuperated as stream 12 after the benzene/toluene recovery 50.
[0071] The result of the pinch analysis in Table 3 shows that the hot utility requirement is only 278 MW or about 9% lower than the process of Example 4 (prior art).
EXAMPLE 5
Prior Art
Improved Classic Styrene Process
[0072] In an improved version of the classic process (Example 3,
EXAMPLE 6
Invention
[0073] New Styrene Process with Selective Hydrogen Oxidation
[0074] In this embodiment the selective hydrogen oxidation 70 using air 13 in between dehydrogenation reactors is combined with the recycle of benzene/toluene as carrier gas 2 and the addition of small amounts of H.sub.2S in stream 11 according to the invention. This is illustrated in
EXAMPLE 7
Invention
[0075] New Styrene Process with Selective Hydrogen Oxidation Before Both Reactors
[0076] Even better energy efficiency is achieved by introducing also an off-gas recycle back to the first reactor. The principle is illustrated in
[0077] The results of the calculations are summarized in Table 3:
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Relative Hot Process Hot Utility, MW Cold Utility, MW Utility Ex. 3 - Prior art 307 145 100 Ex. 4 - Invention 278 238 91 Ex. 5 - Prior art 263 167 86 Ex. 6 - Invention 214 197 70 Ex. 7 - Invention 186 203 61
[0078] The benefits of the inventive process using a sulfur passivated dehydrogenation catalyst are i.a.: [0079] A) The need for hot utility, which will have to be provided by burning additional fuel in a boiler, is significantly lower when avoiding the use of steam as carrier gas but using a benzene/toluene mixture instead. [0080] B) Where off-gas recycle and selective hydrogen oxidation is introduced (Ex. 7) the need for hot utility is reduced even more significantly and it is almost 40% (Ex. 3) or 29% below that of the prior art processes, Ex. 3 and Ex. 5 respectively.