Power measurement method and apparatus
09730617 · 2017-08-15
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
The power used by a user in performing the vertical component of a movement is estimated. An accelerometer attached to a user measures the acceleration experienced by the user during movement. A processor configured to receive the measurements of the acceleration from the accelerometer, be attached to the user, estimate the vertical accelerations from the received acceleration measurements, and estimate the power used from the vertical accelerations.
Claims
1. An apparatus for estimating power used by a user in performing a vertical component of a movement, the apparatus comprising: an accelerometer configured for attachment to a user and configured for measuring components of the acceleration along three orthogonal axes experienced by the user; a processor configured to: receive the measured components of the acceleration A.sub.x, A.sub.y, and A.sub.z, along three orthogonal axes x.sub.a, y.sub.a, and z.sub.a from the accelerometer, estimate an orientation of the accelerometer by calculating an angle θ between the acceleration and an axis that has the component with the highest magnitude of acceleration by: calculating the magnitude of each of the components of the acceleration from the measurements indicating the components of the acceleration A.sub.x, A.sub.y, and A.sub.z along the three orthogonal axes x.sub.a, y.sub.a, and z.sub.a of the accelerometer, identifying the acceleration component with the highest magnitude, determining the angle θ between the acceleration and the axis with the highest component of acceleration from
2. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the movement is a sit-to-stand (STS) transfer and the accelerometer is configured for measuring the acceleration along the three orthogonal axes during the STS transfer.
3. The apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein the processor is further configured to calculate local instability over j samplings based on a variance of a norm of the components of the acceleration by calculating:
var.sub.i−b.sup.i+a(√{square root over (A.sub.x(j).sup.2+A.sub.y(j).sup.2+A.sub.z(j).sup.2)}) where a is a number of sampling instants after a sampling instant i at which the orientation of the calculator is calculated, b is a number of sampling instants before the sampling instant i at which the orientation of the calculator is calculated.
4. The apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein the processor is configured to indicate instability when
var.sub.i−b.sup.i+a(√{square root over (A.sub.x(j).sup.2+A.sub.y(j).sup.2+A.sub.z(j).sup.2)}) is greater than 15 m/s.sup.2.
5. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: a remote display device of the remote computer configured to: receive the estimate of power used during the STS transfer from the transceiver, and display the estimate of power used during the STS transfer.
6. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to compensate the measured components of acceleration for a change in orientation of the accelerometer.
7. A physical therapy apparatus for estimating power used by a user in performing a sit-to-stand (STS) transfer, the apparatus comprising: an accelerometer configured for attachment to a user and configured for measuring acceleration experienced by the user during an STS transfer; and a processor configured to: receive the measurements of the acceleration from the accelerometer; estimate vertical accelerations from the received measurements by: estimating an orientation of the accelerometer from the received acceleration measurements; and identifying the vertical accelerations in the received acceleration measurements using the estimated orientation; and wherein the processor is further configured to: based only on the estimated vertical accelerations, a mass of the user, and gravity, estimate the power used during the STS transfer; and compensate for errors in the estimated orientation by computing a variance of a norm of components of the received acceleration measurements over a period of time; and wherein the apparatus further comprises a transceiver configured to receive the estimated power from the processor, and configured to transmit the estimated power to a remote display device to cause the remote display device to display an indication of an instability when the computed variance is greater than a threshold.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the following drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
(7) As shown in
(8) The sensor unit 2 determines the power or strength used in performing the vertical component of the movement. The sensor unit 2 can calculate the power or strength used over the whole of the vertical movement, but, in alternative embodiments, the sensor unit 2 can be used to determine the power or strength during certain parts of the vertical movement.
(9)
(10) Preferably, the accelerometer 8 is a micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) accelerometer 8.
(11) In the method for calculating the power or strength used in a movement in a vertical direction described herein, the power or strength is calculated in a fixed reference frame (such as the Earth). As part of this method, it is necessary to determine the vertical acceleration experienced by the user 4 during the vertical movement.
(12) In this embodiment of the invention, the vertical acceleration is calculated just from the measurements of the accelerometer 8 in accordance with the algorithm described below.
(13) In some (less preferred) embodiments, the sensor unit 2 comprises one or more other sensors in addition to the accelerometer 8 for determining the orientation (or changes in the orientation) of the sensor unit 2, such as a gyroscope and/or magnetometer. In this embodiment, it is not necessary to implement the algorithm described below, as the gyroscope and/or magnetometer can provide an indication of the orientation of the sensor unit 2, the measurements from the accelerometer 8 can be converted into the fixed reference frame using the determined orientation and the vertical acceleration can be determined.
(14)
(15) As the accelerometer 8 is fixed in the sensor unit 2, the orientation of the sensor unit 2 and accelerometer 8 changes during the STS movement, and the sensor unit 2 is shown at an angle θ from the vertical.
(16) Therefore, to obtain the acceleration in the vertical direction (in the fixed reference frame) it is necessary to compensate the measurements from the accelerometer 8 for these changes in orientation.
(17)
(18) In this FIG., the acceleration A has components A.sub.x, A.sub.y and A.sub.z measured along the three axes respectively.
(19) For an accelerometer 8 that is undergoing small or no accelerations (other than gravity), the acceleration A experienced by the accelerometer 8 will correspond substantially to that of gravity. Thus, from this assumption, it is possible to link the acceleration A to gravity, whose direction is known in the fixed reference frame.
(20) The orientation of the accelerometer 8 can be estimated by calculating the angle between the acceleration A and the axis of the accelerometer 8 that has the highest magnitude of acceleration.
(21) To estimate the orientation of the accelerometer 8, the acceleration acting on the accelerometer 8 is measured, and signals are provided to the processor 10 indicating the components of the acceleration (A.sub.x, A.sub.y and A.sub.z) along the three orthogonal axes of the accelerometer 8 (x.sub.a, y.sub.a and z.sub.a respectively).
(22) The processor 10 calculates the magnitudes of each component of the acceleration A and compares them to identify the component with the highest magnitude.
(23) In the following, the axis (x.sub.a, y.sub.a or z.sub.a) with the component with the highest magnitude is denoted z.sub.a′, and the other two axes are denoted x.sub.a′ and y.sub.a′. In this way, it is possible for the orientation of the accelerometer 8 to be determined regardless of the initial position of the accelerometer 8. For example, although it may be intended for the z.sub.a axis to correspond to a vertically oriented axis in the fixed reference frame, the accelerometer 8 may not be attached to the user 4 in this way (it may be that the y.sub.a axis corresponds most closely to the vertically oriented axis in the fixed reference frame).
(24) It will be noted that in
(25) The processor 10 then determines the angle between the acceleration A and the axis with the highest component of acceleration (z.sub.a′). Thus, it can be seen from
(26)
(27) If all components of the acceleration are zero (i.e. A.sub.x=A.sub.y=A.sub.z=0) then θ and thus the orientation cannot be estimated. In this situation, the accelerometer 8 is in free fall.
(28) Thus, as this angle θ is determined using gravity as a reference, the angle θ can be considered as indicating the orientation of the accelerometer 8 and sensor unit 2.
(29) As the accelerometer 8 is free to move with respect to the fixed reference frame, it is desirable to check for local instability caused by rapid changes in the acceleration. In this way, it is possible to compensate for errors in the determined orientation caused by these rapid changes in acceleration. In particular, local instability is checked by the processor 10 computing the variance of the norm of the components of the acceleration A over a period of time.
(30) A number of signals are obtained from the accelerometer 8 representing the acceleration at a number of sampling instants. These sampling instants preferably occur both before and after the sampling instant, i, at which the orientation of the accelerometer 8 is calculated.
(31) The variance of the norm of the components of the acceleration A are calculated using:
local_instability(i)=var.sub.i−b.sup.i+a(√{square root over (A.sub.x(j).sup.2+A.sub.y(j).sup.2+A.sub.z(j).sup.2)})>α (2)
where a is the number of sampling instants after the sampling instant at which the orientation of the accelerometer 8 is calculated, b is the number of sampling instants before the sampling instant at which the orientation of the accelerometer 8 is calculated and α is a value that indicates a rapid change in acceleration.
(32) The value of α is selected from the range 15-20 m/s.sup.2, and a and b are in the region of 10.
(33) Once the angle θ has been calculated, the processor 10 determines the acceleration in a vertical direction relative to the fixed reference frame.
(34) Referring again to
(35) The acceleration in the vertical direction is calculated from:
acc_vert=(A.sub.z−g cos θ)cos θ+g, if θ>0 or there is local instability (3)
acc_vert=(g cos θ−A.sub.z)cos θ+g, if θ<0 or there is no local instability (4)
where g is the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity in the vertical direction. It will be appreciated that θ<0 in
(36) The power or strength used in a movement in the vertical direction can be calculated using the method shown in
(37) In step 101, a series of measurements or estimates of the acceleration experienced by the user 4 in the vertical direction (in the fixed reference frame) are obtained from the accelerometer 8. As mentioned above, the estimates of the acceleration in the vertical direction can be obtained from a sensor unit 2 whose only sensor is an accelerometer 8, or from a sensor unit 2 that includes an accelerometer, gyroscope and/or magnetometer.
(38) In preferred embodiments, the vertical accelerations can be low pass filtered, for example, by a Butterworth filter with a cut-off frequency of around 2 Hz.
(39) Then, in step 103, the vertical ground reaction force, F.sub.gr, as a function of time, as shown in
F.sub.gr(t)=(acc_vert(t)+g)*m (5)
where g is the acceleration due to gravity and m is the mass of the user 4.
(40) Next, in step 105, the series of measurements or estimates of the vertical acceleration are integrated with respect to time to obtain the vertical velocity during the movement. Thus, the vertical velocity, vel_vert(t) is determined from
vel_vert(t)=∫(acc_vert(t))dt (6)
(41) The start and end points of the integration are determined from the measurements from the accelerometer 8. The start point can be identified as the point at which the vertical acceleration starts to vary after a period of time of being in a steady state (for example the vertical acceleration can start to vary from a zero value or from gravity). The end point can be identified as the point at which the vertical acceleration resumes a steady state after a period of movement (for example the vertical acceleration can return to zero or gravity). The processor 10 can determine the start and end points by examining the measurements of the vertical acceleration.
(42) Finally, in step 107, the power used during the vertical movement is calculated using:
Power(t)=F.sub.gr(t)*vel_vert(t) (7)
(43) The ground reaction force and power determined from the series of measurements of the vertical acceleration form a time series, which can be plotted as a graph over time. It is then also possible to determine the maximum instantaneous power or maximum loading rate of the power.
(44) It will be appreciated that the only input to the described method is the set of measurements of the vertical acceleration. Thus, instead of separately performing steps 103, 105 and 107, these steps can be combined into a single step in which the power is estimated. In this case, the processor 10 will evaluate:
Power(t)=m*(acc_vert(t)+g)*∫(acc_vert(t))dt (8)
(45) The method according to the invention can be used in any on-body sensor unit that includes an accelerometer, for example fall detectors and devices for activity monitoring and evaluation, to estimate or determine the power used in a sit-to-stand transfer. This power estimate can provide a physical performance measure for evaluating balance quality and fall risk. In a home health care scenario, this method would enable a home healthcare provider to monitor the users balance quality or risk of falling in an unobtrusive way.
(46) As the power estimation is based on measuring the movement of the centre of mass of the user 4, the accuracy of the power estimation can be improved by placing the sensor unit 2 as close to the centre of mass of the user 4 as possible. For example, the sensor unit 2 is preferably placed close to the pelvis or lower trunk of the user 4.
(47) A further improvement to the power estimation can be obtained by providing accelerometers at two or more parts of the body of the user 4. For example, this can be achieved by providing two sensor units 2, one sensor unit 2 being placed at the sternum, and the other sensor unit 2 being placed at the pelvis. In this embodiment, one of the sensor units 2 will need to receive the measurements from the other sensor unit(s) 2 in order to calculate the power used.
(48) During particular vertical movements, these sensor units 2 will record different accelerations, and so a weighted average of the accelerometer measurements is calculated for use in the power estimation algorithm. Effectively, the weighted average of the accelerations represents the acceleration acting on a virtual centre of mass position in the user 4.
(49) Preferably, this weighted average is given by:
a.sub.centreofmass=B*a.sub.pelvis+C*a.sub.sternum (9)
where B and C are constants.
(50) In one embodiment the constants B and C have values of 0.603 and 0.397 respectively, as described in “Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement” by Winter, D. A.
(51) In an alternative embodiment of the invention, instead of processing the acceleration measurements in the processor 10 of the sensor unit 2, the sensor unit 2 or sensor units 2 can measure the acceleration, and transmit these measurements to a separate base unit which performs the necessary calculations to estimate the power used during the movement.
(52) As the sensor unit 2 is small and easy to use, it can be used over a long period of time (relative to the period of time possible in a clinical setting) to quantify the power or strength during a particular type of body movement, such as a sit-to-stand transfer. The power or strength can be measured in an unobtrusive fashion, and the methods described above provide a similar accuracy to clinical measurement systems.
(53) While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive; the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments.
(54) Variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. A single processor or other unit may fulfil the functions of several items recited in the claims. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measured cannot be used to advantage. A computer program may be stored/distributed on a suitable medium, such as an optical storage medium or a solid-state medium supplied together with or as part of other hardware, but may also be distributed in other forms, such as via the Internet or other wired or wireless telecommunication systems. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.