Process for the manufacture of alcohol and/or ketone

Abstract

Process for the manufacture of at least one alcohol and/or at least one ketone, which comprises a step during which at least one organic peroxide compound is put into contact with at least one catalyst responding to formula (I) CrN.sub.xO.sub.y Formula (I) in which x is a number varying from 0.10 to 1.00 and y is a number varying from 0.00 to 1.50, in order to produce the at least one alcohol and/or at least one ketone.

Claims

1. A process for the manufacture of at least one alcohol and/or at least one ketone, comprising contacting at least one organic peroxide compound with at least one catalyst responding to formula I:
CrN.sub.xO.sub.y  (formula I) wherein x is a number varying from 0.10 to 1.00 and y is a number from 0.00 to 1.50.

2. The process according to claim 1, wherein x is a number from 0.50 to 1.00 and y is a number from 0.00 to 1.00.

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein x is a number from 0.50 to 1.00 and y is a number from 0.00 to 0.60.

4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the catalyst is chosen among: chromium nitrides of formula CrN.sub.x in which x is a number from 0.50 to 1.00; mixtures comprising such chromium nitrides; chromium oxynitrides of formula CrN.sub.xO.sub.y in which x is a number from 0.50 to 1.00 and y is a number varying from 0.40 to 0.60; and mixtures comprising such oxynitrides.

5. The process according to claim 1, wherein the organic peroxide compound is a hydroperoxide compound responding to formula II:
R—O—O—H  (formula II) in which R is a hydrocarbon group comprising from 4 to 9 carbon atoms.

6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the organic peroxide compound is a hydroperoxide compound responding to formula II:
R—O—O—H  (formula II) in which R is a hydrocarbon group comprising from 4 to 9 carbon atoms.

7. The process according to claim 1, wherein the hydroperoxide compound is chosen in the group consisting of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, tent-amyl hydroperoxide, cumene hydroperoxide, ethylbenzene hydroperoxide, cyclohexyl hydroperoxide and methylcyclohexyl hydroperoxide.

8. The process according to claim 1, wherein the hydroperoxide compound is chosen in the group consisting of tert-butyl hydroperoxide, cumene hydroperoxide and cyclohexyl hydroperoxide.

9. The process according to claim 1, wherein the hydroperoxide compound is cyclohexyl hydroperoxide.

10. The process according to claim 9, wherein the at least one alcohol and/or at least one ketone is cyclohexanol and/or cyclohexanone.

11. The process according to claim 9, wherein the cyclohexyl hydroperoxide is generated by reaction of a cyclohexane with an oxygen generator.

12. The process according to claim 11, wherein the oxygen generator is air.

13. The process according to claim 1, wherein the contact between the peroxide and the catalyst is performed at a temperature from 20° C. to 200° C.

14. The process according to claim 1, wherein the contact between the peroxide and the catalyst is performed at a pressure from 0.1 MPa to 1.5 MPa.

Description

EXAMPLES

[0060] The following examples are intended to illustrate the invention without however limiting the scope thereof.

ANALYSIS

[0061] Iodometry

[0062] Cyclohexyl hydroperoxide (CyOOH) was quantified by iodometry which consisted in reacting CyOOH with potassium iodide to yield cyclohexanol and iodine. The amount of iodine formed was estimated by potentiometry by reaction of iodine with sodium thiosulfate (Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3).

[0063] About 1 g of a solution containing CyOOH was weighed in an Erlenmeyer flask. Then, 20 mL of 80% acetic acid, about 1 g of sodium hydrogenocarbonate (NaHCO.sub.3) and about 1 g of potassium iodide were introduced. NaHCO.sub.3 is a weak base and reacted with acetic acid to produce carbon dioxide, so that oxygen was pushed away. Indeed, the presence of oxygen would induce error on the evaluation of the CyOOH quantity.

[0064] After mixing, the Erlenmeyer flask was stored 20 minutes in the dark. The Erlenmayer flask was washed with distilled water and acetonitrile (which avoids the formation of foam). The solution was dosed with a solution of Na.sub.2S.sub.2O.sub.3 (0.1 N) thanks to a potentiometer equipped with a Pt probe (ref 60451100 Metrohm).

[0065] Gas Chromatography (GC)

[0066] The reaction mixture containing cyclohexane, CyOOH, cyclohexanol, cyclohexanone and small amounts of other byproducts (carboxylic acids . . . ) were quantified by GC using a specific polar column (Permabond FFAP length 20 m, film thickness 0.10 μm) after calibration with different CyOOH solutions of known concentrations established by iodometry.

[0067] Elemental Analyses (EA) were performed by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) or by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS).

[0068] Dinitrogen physisorption for BET area quantification was performed on a Micromeritics Tristar Surface Area and Porosity Analyser at 77 K. BET analyses allowed to determine the surface area of the catalysts.

MATERIALS

[0069] Purified Cyclohexyl Hydroperoxide (CyOOH) Solution

[0070] CyOOH was extracted from a cyclohexane oxidate resulting from the thermal oxidation of cyclohexane by oxygen The oxidate was extracted three times with 1 M NaOH (Merck) and the water phase was then neutralized with a chilled aqueous 4 M HCl (Merck, pro analysi, at least 99 wt %) solution until slightly acidic. The water phase was subsequently extracted 3 times with cyclohexane (Sigma Aldrich, >99%) and dried over Na.sub.2SO.sub.4 or MgSO.sub.4 (Merck). Finally, 1% mol biphenyl (Acros, 99%) was added to the filtered solution as an internal standard for GC analysis and the solution was diluted with cyclohexane to concentrations ranging from 2-5.5 wt % CyOOH.

[0071] Tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBuOOH)

[0072] A 70% tBuOOH/water solution was purchased from Aldrich. The solution was extracted with cyclohexane to get a tBuOOH/cyclohexane solution. The title was adjusted to 4.9 wt % after titration by iodometry.

[0073] Cumene hydroperoxide Cumene hydroperoxide 80% was purchased from Aldrich and diluted in cyclohexane to get a concentration of cumene hydroperoxide of 3.3 wt % checked by iodometry.

[0074] Catalysts According to the Invention

[0075] High-surface chromium nitride (CrN (hs))

[0076] CrN (hs) was prepared as described below and was characterized by a surface area of 20 m.sup.2g.sup.−1. The data resulting from EA were Cr 74.10 wt % and N 20.02 wt %.

[0077] First, precipitated chromium oxide (Cr.sub.2O.sub.3) was prepared from Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.3.9 H.sub.2O. A 0.5 M ethanol solution of Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.3.9 H.sub.2O (1.8 gin 9.2 mL) was dropped slowly by means of a burette in a magnetically stirred Erlenmeyer flask containing 5 mL of 25% aqueous ammonia solution (Aldrich), which helped to keep the pH between 9-10, and drops of the same solution were added to maintain the values within the aforementioned interval. Right after the addition, a dark-grey precipitate formed and stiffing was kept for 90 min more. The solid was vacuum-filtered and washed repeatedly with ethanol and water (30 mL, three times each). The filter cake was taken to the oven and kept at 80° C. during 24 h. The resulting green solid of Cr.sub.2O.sub.3 was calcined under dry, stagnant air at 450° C. for 2 h more, using a 5 C.min.sup.−1 ramp.

[0078] The synthesis of CrN (hs) from precipitated Cr.sub.2O.sub.3 was performed as follows.

[0079] In a crucible enabled with a cap, 1.37 g of Cr.sub.2O.sub.3 were first dissolved in 10 mL of demineralized water with the help of a stiffing bar. When the solid was dissolved, 500 mg of mesoporous silica SBA-15 were added and the stirring (low) was kept overnight. Afterwards, the suspension was heated open in the oven at 90° C. and 0.5° C.min.sup.−1 ramp during more than 10 hours. The resulting material was calcined at 500° C. during 18 h and then treated in a tubular oven with a stream of pure ammonia (99.98%, Linde, 60-100 mL.min.sup.−1), first with a ramp of 2° C. per min, up to 950° C., with a dwelling time of 10 h. Passed this time, the temperature was decreased at 0.5° C. per min down to 700° C., always under running ammonia. The resulting black solid was treated with a 18% NaOH solution during 24 h to remove all the silica template. Finally, the resulting suspension was centrifuged and washed several times with ethanol and water, centrifuged every time to remove the washing solvents. A total of 8 washing/centrifuge treatments were done. Finally, the solid was dried at 120° C. overnight under stagnant air and characterized by EA. 590 mg were isolated.

[0080] Chromium Oxynitride (CrN.sub.0.73O.sub.0.48)

[0081] CrN.sub.0.73O.sub.0.48 was prepared as follows and was characterized by a surface area of 7.09 m.sup.2g.sup.−1.

[0082] A fraction of the Cr.sub.2O.sub.3 obtained above (1 g) was placed in an alumina crucible and set to react in a tubular oven under a flow of anhydrous ammonia (99.98%, Linde, 60-100 mLmin.sup.−1) at 800° C. for 8 h, using a ramp of 6 C.min.sup.−1. Passed this time, the oven was switched off and the flux of ammonia maintained until the tube containing the solid reached ambient temperature. Afterwards, the oven was flushed with nitrogen and the resulting solid isolated and stored in a flask. Results from EA were Cr 74.43 wt %, N 14.61 wt %, O 10.96 wt % (O obtained by subtraction); (% mol) Cr 45.30, N 33.03, O 21.68; proposed stoichiometry, assuming all the solid is in the form of the oxynitride, CrN.sub.0.73O.sub.0.48.

[0083] Chromium Nitride and Chromium Heminitride Mixture (CrN/Cr.sub.2N)

[0084] CrN/Cr.sub.2N, which is a mixture of CrN and Cr.sub.2N, used in examples 1 and 2 was purchased from Aldrich and used as received. It was characterized by 350 mesh, a surface area <1 m.sup.2g.sup.−1 and the results obtained from EA were Cr 83.42 wt % and N 16.23 wt %. This composition corresponds to a mixture of 38 wt % Cr.sub.2N and 62 wt % CrN.

[0085] CrN/Cr.sub.2N, which is a mixture of CrN and Cr.sub.2N, used in examples 13 to 19 was supplied by Alfa Aesar and used as received.

[0086] Other Catalysts

[0087] CrO.sub.2(OtBu).sub.2

[0088] CrO.sub.2(OtBu).sub.2 was prepared according to the procedure described in US 2012/0310012 A1.

[0089] Chromium Aluminophosphates (CrAPO-5)

[0090] CrAPO-5 was prepared according to the procedure detailed here after (based on U.S. Pat. No. 4,559,919). Chromium nitrate [Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.3.9H.sub.2O, 1.6 g] was dissolved in demineralized water (10 mL). Hydrochloric acid (0.6 mL, conc.) was added to the solution, followed by acetic acid (0.68 g, glacial). The mixture was stirred for a few minutes then phosphoric acid (5.52 mL, 85 wt %) was added drop wise. The homogenized mixture was added to previously hydrolyzed slurry of alumina (5.26 g, pseudoboehmite, Catapal B) in water (10 mL). After one hour of stirring, the reaction mixture was cooled to 0° C. and triethyl amine was added drop wise. Stirring was continued for two more hours. The resulting pale-purple gel was charged in a Teflon® autoclave and heated at 175° C. under autogenous pressure during 24 h. The solid was recovered, filtered and washed several times with distilled water. After drying, the resulting green cake was calcined at 500° C. in a static oven during 16 h. The calcined solid was set to exchange with a sodium chloride solution (400 mL, 0.1 mol L.sup.−1, Na/Cr >100) for periods of 8 h. Washing was repeated until no Cr leached was detected by AAS (<0.1 ppm) then washed with distilled water and recalcined at 500° C. under static conditions. X-ray of the solid showed the formation of CrAPO-5 in the form of microcrystalline material. Results of EA on the obtained catalyst were: Cr 0.77 wt %.

[0091] Chromium supported on a nitridised carbon polymer (Cr/pdap) (pdap=polydiaminopyridine)

[0092] As the initial step, 5.45 g of 2,6-diaminopyridine and 1 g of sodium hydroxide were dissolved in 400 ml of distilled water, followed by the addition of 17.1 g of ammonium persulfate and 100 ml of distilled water. The resultant mixture was agitated for several minutes and the polymerization reaction was carried out without agitation at 10° C. for 12 h. Black solid was collected by centrifugation and rinsed with distilled water three times to obtained pdap particles. They were then vacuum-dried at 70° C.

[0093] To synthesize Cr/pdap catalyst, pdap and chromium (III) nitrate hydrate (Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.3 9H.sub.2O) were mixed in a solution of ethanol and water to form a precursor composite. Typically, 5.45 g pdap and 1 g Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.3 9H.sub.2O were suspended in 150 ml of water/ethanol (1/1 v/v). After mixing them for 1 h in an ultrasonic probe system and agitating the solution for additional 2 h at 60° C., the solution was evaporated under vacuum at 60° C. The remaining dry powder was grinded using a quartz mortar.

[0094] Cr/pdap powder was put into a tubular furnace and pyrolyzed in the presence of ammonia gas for 1 or 1.5 h. A quartz tube was used for pyrolysis under a temperature program (0-200° C., 1 h; 200° C., 1 h; 200-700° C., 0.75 h; 700° C., 1.5 h; 700-0° C., 2 h). Heat-treated product was ultrasonically leached in concentrated hydrochloride (HCl) acid for 8 h to remove unstable and inactive metal species from the catalysts. The leached sample was washed in water three times. Finally, the catalyst was collected by filtration and dried at 60° C.

[0095] Cobalt supported on a nitridised carbon polymer (Co/pdap) (pdap=polydiaminopyridine)

[0096] The catalyst was prepared in an identical way as Cr/pdap using 3.62 g CoNO.sub.3 6H.sub.2O instead of 1g of Cr(NO.sub.3).sub.3 9H.sub.2O.

[0097] Chromium carbide (Cr.sub.3C.sub.2)

[0098] Cr.sub.3C.sub.2 was purchased from ABCR and used as received. It was characterized by 350 mesh, a surface area <1 m.sup.2.g.sup.−1 and the results obtained from EA were Cr 80.26 wt % and C 12.23 wt %.

[0099] Tungsten carbide (WC)

[0100] WC was purchased from ABCR and used as received.

[0101] Vanadium nitride (VN)

[0102] VN was purchased from ABCR and used as received.

[0103] Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN)

[0104] h-BN was purchased from Aldrich and used as received.

[0105] Tantalum nitride (TaN)

[0106] TaN was purchased from Aldrich and used as received.

[0107] Titanium nitride (TiN)

[0108] TiN was purchased from Aldrich and used as received.

EXAMPLES 1 TO 12

[0109] The decomposition of CyOOH (called deperoxidation) into cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone was carried out in a 50 mL round-bottom flask equipped with a Dean-Stark trap filled with cyclohexane, a reflux condenser and an arm for collecting aliquots. A CyOOH solution was placed in the round flask and heated to reflux at 80° C. Samples were taken from the flask during reaction using tip filters (HDPE, 0.45 μm) to isolate the aliquots and the reaction was tracked by GC.

[0110] In the case of hot filtration experiments, the reaction was typically stopped after 30-40% conversion and filtered in hot using a fast-filtration funnel using a large plug of cotton tightly pressed through the stem (filtration took around one minute). The recovered filtrate was set to resume the reaction without the solid catalyst and the reaction was tracked by GC again.

[0111] Example 1(according to the invention)

[0112] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (−4.5 wt % in cyclohexane) and 0.125 g of CrN/Cr.sub.2N were heated in an oil bath to reflux.

[0113] To study the degree of leaching at different stages, the reaction medium was hot-filtered at different conversions and the filtrates were analyzed by AAS.

[0114] At low conversion (10%), leaching was barely detectable (chromium measured in solution <0.1 mg/L.sup.−1). The filtered solution was heated and we observed that reaction was stopped meaning the quantity of soluble chromium in solution was low.

[0115] At higher conversion (30% and 75%), the concentration of chromium measured in solution was still very low (0.3 mg.L.sup.−1). Heating the filtered solution showed that CyOOH was slowly converted to cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone meaning small amount of chromium has leached in solution. However, the reaction rate obtained with the filtered solution was lower than the rate obtained with initial CrN/Cr.sub.2N. This observation led us to the conclusion that observed activity in CrN/Cr.sub.2N test was only partly due to leached chromium but also to heterogeneous CrN/Cr.sub.2N catalyst. Hence, CrN/Cr.sub.2N had a strong heterogeneous contribution.

[0116] Example 2 (according to the invention)

[0117] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (−5.5 wt % in cyclohexane) and 1 g of CrN/Cr.sub.2N were heated in an oil bath to reflux. The rate constant observed was 0.017 min.sup.−1.

[0118] Another run was made under the same conditions except that the medium was hot filtered after 30 minutes of reaction at 30% conversion. The filtered solution was heated to reflux. It was observed that reaction continued after filtering the medium meaning some chromium had leached from the catalyst. However, the reaction rate constant after filtration was 0.0064 min.sup.−1 and was thus much lower than with initial CrN/Cr.sub.2N (0.017 min.sup.−1). As a consequence, observed activity in CrN/Cr.sub.2N test was partly due to leached chromium but also to heterogeneous CrN/Cr.sub.2N catalysts. Hence, CrN/Cr.sub.2N has a heterogeneous contribution.

[0119] Example 3 (according to the invention)

[0120] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (−5.5 wt % in cyclohexane) and 0.05 g of CrN (hs) were heated in an oil bath to reflux. After 30 minutes of reaction and 25% conversion, the medium was filtered and the solution without solid catalyst was heated to reflux. The reaction was tracked by GC before and after filtration.

[0121] It was observed that reaction continued after filtering the medium meaning some chromium has leached from the catalyst. However reaction rate constant decreased from 0.01 min.sup.−1 before filtration to 0.005 min.sup.−1 after filtration. As a consequence, observed activity in CrN (hs) test was partly due to leached chromium but also to heterogeneous CrN (hs) catalysts. Hence, CrN (hs) has a heterogeneous contribution.

[0122] Example 4 (comparative example)

[0123] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (5.5 wt % in cyclohexane) and 0.7 g of CrAPO5 were heated in an oil bath to reflux. The reaction was tracked by GC and the rate constant observed was 0.017 min.sup.−1.

[0124] Another run was made under the same conditions except that the medium was hot filtered after 30 minutes of reaction and 40% conversion. The filtered solution was heated to reflux. It was observed that reaction continued after filtering the medium meaning some chromium had leached from the catalyst. The reaction rate constant after filtration was 0.014 min.sup.−1 which is comparable to the rate obtained when using CrAPO5. It means that catalytic activity was virtually all homogeneous.

[0125] Example 5 (comparative example)

[0126] The following example relates to the use of Cr/pdap. The reaction was performed using the same procedure as example 4.

[0127] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (5.3 wt % in cyclohexane) and 100 mg of Cr/pdap were heated in an oil bath to reflux. After hot filtration (50 min, 41% conversion), the reaction rate did not change significantly, suggesting the catalytic reaction was virtually all homogeneous contrary to what was observed in example 1 with CrN/Cr.sub.2N.

[0128] Example 6 (comparative example)

[0129] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (ca. 5.5 wt % in cyclohexane) and 1 g of Cr.sub.3C.sub.2 were heated in an oil bath to reflux. Upon hot filtration (58 min, 39% conversion), no changes in the reaction rate were observed, which strongly suggested the whole reaction took place in the homogeneous phase contrary to what was observed in example 1 with CrN/Cr.sub.2N.

[0130] Example 7 (comparative example)

[0131] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (ca. 5.5 wt % in cyclohexane) and 1 g of WC were heated in an oil bath to reflux. Most notably, upon hot filtration (30 min, 3.26% conversion), no changes in the reaction rate were observed, which strongly suggested the whole reaction took place in the homogeneous phase contrary to what was observed in example 1 with CrN/Cr.sub.2N.

[0132] Example 8 (comparative example)

[0133] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (ca. 2.5 wt % in cyclohexane) and 0.130 g of VN were heated in an oil bath to reflux. A reaction took place but the reactivity of VN at ambient temperature and obvious coloration of the filtrate after the reaction were a clear indication of the homogeneous nature of VN.

[0134] Example 9 (comparative example)

[0135] 40 g of a CyOOH purified solution (ca. 2.5 wt % in cyclohexane) were heated in an oil bath to reflux. When the mixture was boiling, 130 mg of h-BN were added. No reaction took place.

[0136] Example 10 (comparative example)

[0137] Example 9 was reproduced replacing the 130 mg of h-BN by the same quantity of TaN no reaction took place,

[0138] Example 11 (comparative example)

[0139] Example 9 was reproduced replacing the 130 mg of h-BN by 50 mg of TiN. No reaction took place.

[0140] Example 12 (comparative example)

[0141] The following example relates to the use of Co/pdap.

[0142] The catalytic test was performed as described in example 5 replacing the 100 mg of Cr/pdap by 50 mg of Co/pdap. No reaction was observed.

[0143] Example 13 (according to the invention)

[0144] To ascertain the heterogeneous nature of the catalysts according to the invention and study the stability of these catalysts, a fixed bed test was undertaken. The reactor was a liquid full plug flow glass reactor of 0.5 cm internal diameter. The feed consisted of a 4.5 wt % CyOOH solution. In order to increase particle size of the catalyst, 1.62 g of CrN/Cr.sub.2N were mixed with 0.19 g of silica and pressed to pellets. Then the catalyst was crushed and sieved between 450 and 560 μm. The CyOOH flow was fed over the catalyst at 0.3 mL/min at 70° C. This reaction enabled to obtain 20% of conversion. The conversion was stable over a period of 6 h without loss of activity, which confirms that chromium did not leach from catalyst and that CrN/Cr.sub.2N had a heterogeneous behavior.

[0145] Example 14 (according to the invention):

[0146] To ascertain the heterogeneous nature of the catalysts according to the invention and study the stability of these catalysts at higher conversion, a fixed bed test with a higher amount of catalyst was undertaken. The reactor was a liquid full plug flow glass reactor of 0.5 cm internal diameter. The feed consisted of a 4.7 wt % CyOOH solution. In order to increase particle size of the catalyst, 15 g of CrN/Cr.sub.2N were mixed with 2.65 g of silica and pressed to pellets and prepared as in example 13. The CyOOH flow was fed over the catalyst at 0.3 mL/min at 80° C. We observed an initial conversion of 80% which decreased with time to 14% after 169 h of reaction and stabilized to this value during 46 h. The initial decrease of activity is due to the loss of chromium by leaching. Stabilization after 169 h shows that leaching is then lowered. Then, after 217 h of reaction, the CyOOH flowrate was reduced to 0.15 mL/min in order to increase conversion. The conversion rose to 28% and then slightly decreased to 25% after 436 h test and stabilized to this value during 24 h. The stabilization of activity confirms that CrN/Cr.sub.2N has an heterogeneous behavior and that leaching is very low.

[0147] Example 15 (according to the invention):

[0148] We added a second liquid full plug flow glass reactor (0.5 cm internal diameter) at the outlet of the reactor described in example 14. The second reactor was filled with 15.6 g of CrN/Cr.sub.2N mixed with 2.76 g of silica (and pressed to pellets and prepared as in example 13), whereas used catalyst remained unchanged in the first reactor. The feed consisted of a 4.7 wt % CyOOH solution flowing at 0.15 mL/min and passing through the 2 fixed bed reactors heated at 80° C. The initial conversion was 90% which decreased to 50% after 460 h. The conversion then remained unchanged at 50% during 240 h. The initial decrease of activity is ascribed to initial leaching of the new catalyst. Stabilization at 50% conversion means leaching is very low confirming the heterogeneous nature of CrN/Cr.sub.2N.

[0149] Example 16 (according to the invention):

[0150] The mixture obtained from example 15 after passing through 2 fixed bed reactors has been recycled to the inlet of the first reactor. Under identical conditions as described in example 15, the global conversion reached 70% and was stable at this value during 117 h, thus confirming the heterogeneous behavior of CrN/Cr.sub.2N.

[0151] Examples 17 to 19 (according to the invention)

[0152] The examples 17 to 19 showed that CrN/Cr.sub.2N can be used in the decomposition of different organic peroxides into corresponding alcohol and ketone, even if conversion is low for some of them.

[0153] Example 17

[0154] 3.1 g of a 4.9% CyOOH solution in cyclohexane were added in a 10 mL tube equipped with a magnetic stirrer. Then 376 mg of CrN/Cr.sub.2N were weighed and added to the reaction mixture. The medium was heated to reflux at 80° C. and remained at this temperature during 2 hours. After being cooled down to room temperature, the mixture was analyzed by iodometry. After that time, all CyOOH had reacted and the conversion was 100%.

[0155] Example 18

[0156] Example 17 was reproduced with 3.2 g of the 4.9 wt % t-butyl hydroperoxide solution in cyclohexane and 378 mg of the same catalyst. After the 2 hours, 3.32 wt % of t-butyl hydroperoxide still remained in the medium and the conversion was 32%.

[0157] Example 19

[0158] Example 17 was reproduced with 3.2 g of the 3.3 wt % cumene hydroperoxide solution in cyclohexane and 366 mg of the same catalyst. After the 2 hours, 3.1 wt % of cumene hydroperoxide still remained in the medium and the conversion was 6%.