DEVICE FOR ASCERTAINING A MISALIGNMENT OF A DETECTION UNIT FASTENED ON A VEHICLE
20170261600 · 2017-09-14
Inventors
- Nils Stefan Maennicke (Herrenberg, DE)
- Igor Wetoschkin (Freiberg, DE)
- Marcus Steffen Reiher (Stuttgart, DE)
Cpc classification
International classification
Abstract
A method and a device for ascertaining a misalignment of at least one detection unit fastened on a vehicle with respect to the intended sensor main beam direction. The device includes at least one detection unit which emits signals and receives partial signals which have been reflected on objects, and ascertains the distance and the azimuth angle of the reflecting objects, and further includes an evaluation unit, to which the ascertained positions of the at least one detection unit are forwarded, and the determination of a misalignment takes place in the evaluation unit by comparing the stored alignment of the sensor main beam direction and the ascertained angle of the object extension with respect to the sensor main beam direction, this taking place under the assumption that the vehicle is moving on average, in parallel to the object extension, for the period during which the misalignment is ascertained.
Claims
1. A device for ascertaining a misalignment of at least one detection unit fastened on a vehicle with respect to an intended sensor main beam direction, the device comprising: at least one detection unit which emits signals and receives partial signals which have been reflected on objects, and ascertains a distance and an azimuth angle of the reflecting objects; and an evaluation unit to which the ascertained distance and azimuth angle are forwarded, wherein the determination of a misalignment takes place in the evaluation unit by comparing stored alignment of the sensor main beam direction and an ascertained angle of an object extension with respect to a sensor main beam direction, and under the assumption that the vehicle is moving on average in parallel to the object extension for a period during which the misalignment is ascertained.
2. The device as recited in claim 1, wherein the detection unit is a radar sensor which operates in the microwave range or the millimeter-wave range.
3. The device as recited in claim 1, wherein multiple detection units are mounted on the vehicle.
4. The device as recited in claim 3, wherein the detection areas of adjacent detection units at least partially overlap.
5. The device as recited in claim 3, wherein knowledge of the instantaneous misalignment angle of a detection unit is utilized for ascertaining the misalignment angle of an adjacently situated detection unit.
6. A method for ascertaining a misalignment of at least one detection unit fastened on a vehicle with respect to an intended sensor main beam direction, the method comprising: emitting signals, by at least one detection unit, and receiving partial signals reflected on objects; ascertaining a distance and an azimuth angle of the reflecting objects, the ascertained distance and azimuth angle of the objects being forwarded to the at least one detection unit with the aid of an evaluation unit, wherein the determination of a misalignment takes place in the evaluation unit by comparing stored alignment of the sensor main beam direction and an ascertained angle of an object extension with respect to a sensor main beam direction, and under the assumption that the vehicle is moving on average in parallel to the object extension for a period during which the misalignment is ascertained.
7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein, in order to ascertain the misalignment angle, a comparison of the stored alignment of the sensor main beam direction and the ascertained angle of the object extension with respect to the sensor main beam direction is carried out by ascertaining a difference angle between a vehicle longitudinal axis and the sensor main beam direction, and, from this, subtracting the angle value at which the detection unit ascertains the reflected partial signals of the transmission signals reflected on the extended object.
8. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the misalignment is ascertained when specific object situations are detected.
9. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the specific object situation is one of: a detection of an extended object next to the host vehicle on the right in a direction of travel of the host vehicle; a detection of an extended object next to the host vehicle on the left in the direction of travel; or a detection of extended objects next to the host vehicle on the left and on the right in the direction of travel.
10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein an extended object is inferred when one of a guardrail, a concrete wall, a bridge railing, or a tunnel wall, is detected.
11. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the ascertained misalignment angle is utilized for correcting an instantaneously measured object angle.
12. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein a shutoff of the detection unit takes place when the ascertained misalignment angle exceeds a predefined threshold value.
13. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein the misalignment angle used for correcting the instantaneously measured object angle is ascertained with the aid of a long-term filtering of measured values.
14. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the misalignment angle to be ascertained for the shutoff is ascertained with the aid of a short-term filtering of the measured values.
15. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein positions of stationary objects detected in a range having the highest measuring quality are utilized for ascertaining a misalignment.
16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein a detection unit has the highest measuring quality in a subarea of a detection area where the detection unit has at least one of: i) the greatest range, and ii) the highest angular accuracy.
17. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein, when multiple detection units are mounted on a vehicle, whereby when the detection areas of adjacent detection units at least partially overlap, knowledge of the instantaneous misalignment angle of a detection unit is utilized for ascertaining the misalignment angle of an adjacently situated detection unit.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0024] Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described in below with reference to the figures.
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS
[0028]
[0029] Detection areas 4 of front detection units 2 and detection areas 4 of rear detection units 2 overlap ahead of vehicle 1 in direction of travel v and behind vehicle 1, respectively, and form overlap areas 5. Detection areas 4 of detection units 2 may also be configured, of course, in such a way that overlap areas 5 may also form next to vehicle 1, on the left and on the right as viewed in direction of travel v, which is not represented in
[0030] The schematic configuration of the device according to the present invention is represented in
[0031] In addition, the intended installation angle of particular detection unit 2, which indicates the difference angle between vehicle longitudinal axis 16 and sensor main beam direction 3 of detection units 2, may be stored. The position of the object reflection with respect to vehicle longitudinal axis 16 may be indicated on the basis of the difference between these two angle values. In the detected specific object situation, namely the detection of an extended object such as, for example, a guardrail, a concrete wall, a bridge railing, a tunnel wall, or a similar structure on the edge of the road, transmission signals Tx from detection units 2 are reflected back on the object surface at a right angle and are received as received signals Rx. As a result, the object reflection points are positioned at an angle of approximately exactly 90° with respect to vehicle longitudinal axis 16. If one subtracts 90° therefrom or adds 90° thereto, depending on the vehicle side and depending on the sign orientation of the detection areas, an averaged angle value is obtained, which corresponds to the averaged misalignment angle. A deviation on the one vehicle side toward positive angular deviations and a deviation having approximately the same order of magnitude on the other side of the vehicle toward negative angle values allows for a cross adjustment between detection unit 2 mounted on the left side of vehicle 1 and detection unit 2 mounted on the right side of vehicle 1.
[0032] This measuring method is also represented in
[0033] Due to the emission of transmission signals Tx 6 by detection units 2, radar waves or microwaves, for example, are radiated into the vehicle surroundings and are partially reflected on extended objects 13, 14. These reflected partial waves 7 are received by detection units 2 as received signals Rx, and their relative angle with respect to particular sensor main beam direction 3 is measured. On the basis of the knowledge of this object angle and the difference angle γ, and on the basis of the knowledge that the object reflections on extended objects 13 and 14 are reflected at a right angle, an instantaneous misalignment angle may be determined and may be ascertained for a predetermined time period. On the basis of the knowledge of the individual misalignment angle values and on the basis of the knowledge of the deviations on the left side of vehicle 1 and on the right side of vehicle 1, the alignments of main beam directions 3 of detection units 2 may be recalibrated, since their intended alignment with respect to vehicle longitudinal axis 16 is known in the sensors. The calibration takes place in this case in such a way that a deviation of the averaged object angles is added to all measured object angles as a compensation angle or a correction value.
[0034] If a threshold value for a misalignment angle is exceeded, it may be inferred that this is not only a slight misalignment, but rather that a greater misalignment of detection unit 2 has occurred as a result of an accident or a collision, and individual detection unit 2 or the entire system is shut off.