METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR TREATING WATER IN A POOL
20210371307 · 2021-12-02
Inventors
- Sven BOETHIUS (Nice, FR)
- Björn Wickman (Floda, SE)
- Anders HELLMAN (Stenungsund, SE)
- Andreas DARNELL (Varberg, SE)
Cpc classification
C02F1/46104
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C02F1/4674
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C02F2303/185
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C02F2103/42
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
Abstract
Disclosed is a method and a system for cleaning water in pools, particularly reducing undesired disinfection-by-products. An electrolytic system includes an electrode arrangement including first and second electrodes, functioning as an anode and a cathode, and an Electronic Control Unit. The ECU controls the process so the potential of the anode is 1.4-2.3 V, more preferably 1.6-2.1 V and most preferably 1.7-1.9 V relative the Reversible Hydrogen Electrode. The system and method may further include the use of a reference electrode to control the potential of the first or second electrode to function as a working electrode and being the anode relative the other one of the first and second electrodes being the cathode and functioning as a counter electrode. The ECU could be programmed to alternately control the first electrode 101 and the second electrode to function as anode and cathode
Claims
1. A method for reducing the concentration of trichloramines in pool water, comprising the step of subjecting the water to an electrolytic treatment by using a first electrode (101) and a second electrode (102) functioning as an anode and a cathode wherein the anode is controlled to have a potential of between 1.4 V and 2.3 V relative the Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE).
2. The method for treatment of water according to claim 1, wherein the anode is controlled to have a potential of between 1.6 and 2.1 V relative the Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE).
3. The method for treatment of water according to claim 2, wherein the anode is controlled to have a potential of between 1.7 and 1.9 relative the Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE).
4. The method for treatment of water according to claim 1, wherein a reference electrode (103) is used in order to control the potential of the anode to a desired value.
5. The method for treatment of water according to claim 1, wherein a combined surface area of the first and second electrodes (101, 102) is at least 0.0001 square meters per cubic meter of water in the pool to be treated.
6. The method for treatment of water according to claim 1, wherein a combined surface area of the first and second electrodes (101, 102) is at least 0.0005 square meters per cubic meter of water passing through the purification conduit every hour.
7. The method for treatment of water according to claim 1, wherein a combined surface area of the first and second electrodes (101, 102) is at least 0.002 square meters per cubic meter of water passing the electrodes every hour.
8. The method for treatment of water according to claim 1, wherein the first electrode (101) and the second electrode (102) alternate between being used as the anode and the cathode.
9. The method for treatment of pool water according to claim 1, wherein the method either uses an external sensor system providing data input or comprises a sensor system for measuring relevant parameters in order to control electrolysis cells used for the electrolytic treatment.
10. An electrolytic system for reducing the concentration of trichloramines in pool water, said system comprising an electrode arrangement (100a, 100b) including a first electrode (101) and a second electrode (102) functioning as an anode and a cathode and an Electronic Control Unit, ECU, (104), wherein the ECU (104) is designed to control the process such that the potential of the anode is between 1.4 V and 2.3 V relative the Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE).
11. The electrolytic system for cleaning water in pools according to claim 10, wherein the ECU (104) is programmed to alternately control the first electrode (101) and the second electrode (102) to function as anode respectively cathode.
12. The electrolytic system for cleaning water in pools according to claim 10, wherein the electrode arrangement (100a) comprises a reference electrode (103).
13. The method for treatment of water according to claim 1, wherein a combined surface area of the first and second electrodes (101, 102) is at least 0.001 square meters per cubic meter of water passing through a purification conduit every hour.
14. The method for treatment of water according to claim 1, wherein a combined surface area of the first and second electrodes (101, 102) is at least 0.003 square meters per cubic meter of water passing the electrodes every hour.
15. The method of claim 9, wherein the relevant parameters comprise parameters used for estimating the concentration of combined chlorine, redox potential or pH value in the pool water.
16. The electrolytic system of claim 10, wherein the ECU (104) is designed to control the process such that the potential of the anode is between 1.6 V and 2.1 V relative the Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE).
17. The electrolytic system of claim 10, wherein the ECU (104) is designed to control the process such that the potential of the anode is between 1.7 V and 1.9 V relative the Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE).
18. The method for treatment of water according to claim 2, wherein a reference electrode (103) is used in order to control the potential of the anode to a desired value.
19. The method for treatment of water according to claim 3, wherein a reference electrode (103) is used in order to control the potential of the anode to a desired value.
20. The method for treatment of water according to claim 2, wherein a combined surface area of the first and second electrodes (101, 102) is at least 0.0001 square meters per cubic meter of water in the pool to be treated.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0021] The present invention will now be described more in detail with reference to the appended drawings, where:
[0022]
[0023]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0024] In
[0025] It is described that it is possible to only connect one of the electrodes, e.g. the first electrode 101, to the ECU 104 to be used as the working electrode. However, it may be useful to connect both the first electrode 101 and second electrode 102 to the ECU such that both the first and second electrodes 101, 102 may be controlled by the ECU 4 and the ECU may control the electrodes 101, 102 to switch between using the first electrode 101 and the second electrode 102 as working electrode. By switching the electrode to be used as working electrode the deterioration of the working electrode may be reduced and the equipment will endure and function satisfactorily for a longer time.
[0026] The electrode arrangement 100a is disclosed in a schematic and simplistic way in
[0027] In more advanced configurations, the ECU 104 may be connected to further devices, e.g. sensors for sensing the pH in the water to be treated, amount of chlorine/chloramines in the water, temperature or other kind of sensors which may be used as input in order to control the power supply to the electrodes.
[0028] In
[0029] Hence, an electrode package 105b as described in
[0030] The electrode arrangements 100a, 100b in
[0031] In
[0032] In
[0033] The purification circuit 200b in
[0034] The schematic drawings in
[0035] The electrode arrangement 100a, 100b may be used to retrofit into existing purification circuits or may be added as a separate purification unit in a separate circuit. The electrode arrangement may thus be used together with existing purification devices or as the only purification unit in the pool. However, since the electrode package 105 is intended to be used for reducing the amount of chloramines, in particular trichloramines, it is evident that it is mainly intended to be used in pools where chlorine is present, e.g. where chlorine is used as a disinfectant in pool water.
[0036] The electrodes to be used may be made of a variety of different materials and commercially available electrodes may be used. Generally, the first and second electrodes are made of the same material even though they may be made from different materials. In particular, when the first and second electrodes are alternately used as the working electrode by switching the polarity of the electrodes, they are suitably made of the same material.
EXPERIMENTS
[0037] Apart from laboratory tests, experiments have been performed in two pilot tests performed on two different indoor pools. The equipment used basically corresponds to the electrode arrangement 100a disclosed in
[0038] When measuring the efficiency of the electrode arrangement used in the pilot tests related to reduction of trichloramine leaving the pool water, baseline measures were made prior to the installation and similar measurements were made during the pilot period with the electrode arrangement in use.
[0039] The measuring procedure used the following steps:
[0040] (1) taking water samples out of the water purification circuit into a container, followed by
[0041] (2) extracting samples of the air inside the container
[0042] (3) measurements of the trichloramine concentration in the extracted samples were conducted.
[0043] With this method, the effect of the pool hall ventilation system was avoided.
[0044] Pilot test one was performed on a small swimming pool, 85 m3 in volume, with a water throughput in the purification circuit of 58 m3/hour, of which 20 m3/hour passed through the electrode arrangement, which had an electrode contact surface area (with the water passing) of 19 dm2 (for the first electrode and the second electrode combined).
[0045] The system was controlled to a potential of 1.8 V on the working electrode.
[0046] Compared with the baseline trichloramine concentration of 0.7 PPM, pilot test one showed a reduction of 60-70% of that count.
[0047] Pilot test two was performed on a larger swimming pool, 630 m3 in volume (25×16m), with a water throughput in the purification circuit of 100 m3/hour, of which 30 m3/hour passed the electrode arrangement. The combined electrode contact surface area was 38 dm2. The same potential control was used as in pilot one.
[0048] Compared with the baseline trichloramine concentration of 1.0 ppm, pilot test two showed a reduction of 65-70% of that count.
[0049] The two swimming pools used for these pilot tests were of a “better than average” standard regarding trichloramine counts made the standard (pool-side) way, before the introduction of the electrode arrangement.
[0050] The results of the pilots show a significant reduction of the trichloramine count and reduced the concentration of trichloramines in the pool water of up to 70%.