Zeolite composite catalysts for conversion of heavy reformate to xylenes

Abstract

Embodiments of zeolite composite catalysts and methods of producing the zeolite composite catalysts are provided, where the methods comprise dissolving in an alkaline solution a catalyst precursor comprising at least one mesoporous zeolite while heating, stirring, or both to yield a dissolved zeolite solution, where the mesoporous zeolite has a molar ratio of SiO.sub.2/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 of at least 30, where the mesoporous zeolite comprises zeolite beta, adjusting the pH of the dissolved zeolite solution, aging the pH adjusted dissolved zeolite solution to yield solid zeolite composite from the dissolved zeolite solution, and calcining the solid zeolite composite to produce the zeolite composite catalyst, where the zeolite composite catalyst has a mesostructure comprising at least one disordered mesophase and at least one ordered mesophase, and where the zeolite composite catalyst has a surface area defined by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis of at least 600 m.sup.2/g.

Claims

1. A zeolite composite catalyst comprising a mesostructure comprising at least one disordered mesophase and at least one ordered mesophase, where the zeolite composite catalyst has a surface area defined by a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis of at least 600 m.sup.2/g and where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises zeolite beta, a zeolite composite catalyst comprising a mesostructure comprising at least one disordered mesophase and at least one ordered mesophase, where the zeolite composite catalyst has a surface area defined by BET of at least 600 m?/g with hydrogen gas at 400° C., where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises zeolite beta.

2. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 1 where the surface area as defined by BET is at least 700 m.sup.2/g.

3. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 1 where the zeolite composite catalyst has an external surface area of at least 300 m.sup.2/g.

4. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 1 where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises a total pore volume of at least 0.50 cm.sup.3/g.

5. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 1 where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises zeolite beta/MCM-41.

6. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 1 where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises a binder.

7. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 6 where the binder is an alumina based binder.

8. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 6 where a ratio by weight of the solid zeolite composite to binder is 3:1 to 4:1.

9. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 1 where the ordered mesophase is a hexagonal mesophase.

10. The zeolite composite catalyst of claim 1 where the disordered mesophase comprises a hexagonal mesophase.

11. A method of converting C.sub.9+ alkyl aromatic hydrocarbons to a product stream comprising benzene, toluene, and xylene, the method comprising: reducing with hydrogen gas at 400° C. a zeolite composite catalyst comprising a mesostructure comprising at least one disordered mesophase and at least one ordered mesophase, where the zeolite composite catalyst has a surface area defined by BET of at least 600 m.sup.2/g, where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises zeolite beta; contacting a feed comprising C.sub.9+ alkylaromatic hydrocarbons with the reduced composite zeolite catalyst and hydrogen in a transalkylation zone of a reactor to produce a transalkylation product; stripping C.sub.1-C.sub.5 and lighter hydrocarbons and stripping unreacted feed from the transalkylation product; and collecting xylenes product from the transalkylation product.

12. The method of claim 11 where the transalkylation zone is at a pressure between 1.0 to 3.0 MPa, a temperature of 200° C. to 500° C., a space velocity of 1.0 to 5.0 h.sup.−1, and a hydrogen to hydrocarbon ratio of 1 to 4.

13. The method of claim 11 where the zeolite composite catalyst has an external surface area of at least 300 m.sup.2/g.

14. The method of claim 11 where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises a total pore volume of at least 0.50 cm.sup.3/g.

15. The method of claim 11 where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises zeolite beta/MCM-41.

16. The method of claim 11 where the zeolite composite catalyst comprises a binder.

17. The method of claim 16 where the binder is an alumina based binder.

18. The method of claim 16 where a ratio by weight of the solid zeolite composite to binder is 3:1 to 4:1.

19. The method of claim 11 where the ordered mesophase is a hexagonal mesophase.

20. The method of claim 11 where the disordered mesophase comprises a hexagonal mesophase.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a flow chart depicting the synthesis of a zeolite composite catalyst in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.

(2) FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration depicting the conversion of heavy reformate into xylenes in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.

(3) FIG. 3 is an X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) graph of a zeolite composite catalyst with an ordered hexagonal mesophase, which was produced through dissolution of zeolite beta using 0.45 Molarity (M) NaOH solution in the presence of cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB).

(4) FIG. 4 is an XRD graph of a zeolite composite catalyst having an ordered hexagonal mesophase and a disordered hexagonal mesophase, which was produced through the dissolution of zeolite beta using 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of CTAB in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.

(5) FIG. 5 is an XRD graph of a zeolite composite catalyst having an ordered hexagonal mesophase and a disordered hexagonal mesophase, which was produced through the dissolution of zeolite beta using 0.2 M NaOH solution in the presence of CTAB in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.

(6) FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the pore size distribution of the catalyst depicted in FIG. 3.

(7) FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the pore size distribution of the catalyst depicted in FIG. 4 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.

(8) FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the pore size distribution of the catalyst depicted in FIG. 5 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.

(9) FIG. 9 is a TEM image showing ordered hexagonal phase and disordered hexagonal phase in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(10) Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of a zeolite composite catalyst comprising a mesostructure comprising at least one disordered mesophase and at least one ordered mesophase. In one embodiment, the ordered mesophase is a hexagonal mesophase, and the disordered mesophase comprises a hexagonal mesophase. Without being bound by theory, composite catalyst with ordered and disordered mesophase formation provides improved transalkylation catalyst activity, which provides improved yield of xylenes as compared to zeolite beta and or typical zeolite beta/MCM-41 composite zeolites. As defined, “ordered mesophase” means a crystalline zeolite uniform arrangement of mesopores, where “mesopores” have an average pore diameter between 2 and 50 nanometers. As defined, “disordered mesophase” means a non-uniform arrangement of pores, where mesopores have an average pore diameter between 2 and 50 nanometers. As defined, “ordered/disordered phase” means the surface has a combination of at least one ordered mesophase and at least one disordered mesophase as shown in the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of FIG. 9.

(11) In one embodiment, the zeolite composite catalyst may comprise a silica-alumina compound. In another embodiment, the silica-alumina compound may comprise a molar ratio of SiO.sub.2/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 of at least 30. Moreover, the molar ratio of SiO.sub.2/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 may be from 30 to 100, or from 40 to 80.

(12) In one embodiment, the zeolite composite catalyst may comprise zeolite beta. Zeolite beta is a complex intergrowth family, whose desilication stability is lower than ZSM-5 and mordenite. A commercial embodiment of the zeolite beta is HSZ-940NHA, available from Tosoh Corporation, Japan. In addition, the mesoporous zeolite of the catalyst precursor may comprise at least additional metal or metal oxide in the framework or matrix of the zeolite catalyst. The additional metal or metal oxide in the framework of the zeolite composite catalyst may include zirconium, germanium, tin, or combinations thereof. While various amounts are considered suitable, the molar ratio of silica to the additional metal components (e.g., germanium, zirconium, tin, or combinations thereof) may be from 5 to 100, or from 20 to 100.

(13) Moreover, the zeolite composite catalyst may also comprise at least one additional zeolite, for example, medium or large pore zeolites selected from the group of mordenite, ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-12, ZSM-22, ZSM-23, MFI topology zeolite, NES topology zeolite, EU-1, MAPO-36, SAPO-5, SAPO-11, SAPO-34, and SAPO-41. For purposes of this disclosure small pore zeolites have a pore size of 3-5 angstroms (Å), medium pore zeolites have a pore size of 5-6 Å, and large pore zeolites have a pore size of 6-8 Å. Without being limited to theory, this may allow the zeolite composite catalyst to maintain the acidity advantage of the medium or large pore zeolite while inheriting pore structure qualities of the mesoporous materials. The amount of this second zeolite may range from 10 to 90 wt % of the total zeolite composite catalyst amount in the final dried and calcined form. The acidity is defined by the ratio of silica to alumina groups in the particular zeolite composite catalyst. The zeolite composite catalyst has an intermediate acidity. For purposes of this disclosure a silica to alumina ratio less than 20 is considered high acidity, a silica to alumina ration in the range of 30 to 100 is considered an intermediate acidity, and a silica to alumina ratio of more than 100 is considered a low acidity.

(14) Moreover, the zeolite composite catalysts may be impregnated with active metals for catalysis, for example, active metals selected from the group consisting of molybdenum, chromium, platinum, nickel, platinum, palladium, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the active metal is molybdenum. The metal component may exist within the final catalytic composite as a compound, such as an oxide, sulfide or halide, in chemical combination with one or more of the other ingredients of the composite, or as an elemental metal. The active metal component may be present in the final zeolite composite catalyst in any amount that is catalytically effective, generally comprising 0.01 to 5 wt % of the final catalyst calculated on an elemental basis.

(15) As described in the synthesis discussion as follows, the zeolite composite catalyst may include a zeolite beta/MCM-41 structure produced from a zeolite beta precursor. In at least one embodiment, the zeolite composite catalyst comprises less than 20% of MCM-41 mesoporous content formed from the zeolite beta precursor.

(16) From a property standpoint, the zeolite composite catalyst may have a surface area defined by a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis of at least 600 meters.sup.2/g (m.sup.2/g), or a BET surface area of at least 700 m.sup.2/g. Further, the zeolite composite catalyst may have an external surface area of at least 300 m.sup.2/g, or an external surface area of at least 350 m.sup.2/g.

(17) In one or more embodiments, the zeolite composite catalyst may have a total pore volume of 0.20 to 3.0 cm.sup.3/g, or 0.30 to 1.0 cm.sup.3/g. Moreover, the zeolite composite catalyst may have a total pore volume of at least 0.30 cm.sup.3/g, or of at least 0.40 cm.sup.3/g, or at least 0.50 cm.sup.3/g. In another embodiment, the zeolite composite catalyst may have an average pore diameter of at least 30 angstroms (3 nanometers).

(18) Referring to FIG. 1, the method of producing the zeolite composite catalyst may comprise the steps of providing a catalyst precursor 10 comprising a mesoporous zeolite having a molar ratio of SiO.sub.2/Al.sub.2O.sub.3 of at least 30 and dissolving in an alkaline solution while heating, stirring, or both to yield a dissolved zeolite solution 20. In one embodiment, the catalyst precursor comprises zeolite beta to yield the zeolite beta precursor. Additionally, the catalyst precursor may comprise zeolite beta and at least one additional mesoporous zeolite selected from the group consisting of mordenite, ZSM-22, ZSM-12, and combinations thereof to yield an alternate zeolite beta precursor.

(19) The dissolving step, also called desilication, may be conducted in the presence of a surfactant 30, where the surfactant is often called a templating agent for the zeolite catalyst. While the FIG. 1 embodiment shows templating surfactant, it is contemplated in other embodiments that surfactant is absent. For example and not by way of limitation, the surfactant is a cationic surfactant. The cationic surfactant may include a quaternary ammonium compound. For example and not by way of limitation, the quaternary ammonium cationic surfactant may be cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB). Various amounts of surfactant are contemplated for inclusion in the catalyst precursor. For example, the catalyst precursor may include 1 weight % to 10 weight % surfactant, for example CTAB, or 2 weight % to 8 weight % surfactant, for example CTAB.

(20) During conventional desilication, the mesoporosity in the zeolite is generated by desilication using standard conditions. For example, desilication may be performed using 0.2 M NaOH with 30 min of stirring at 65° C. By this process, one third of the catalyst is lost due to desilication; however, the present method utilizes that desilicated source to generate mesoporosity using the surfactant template.

(21) Further as shown in FIG. 1, the dissolution may occur slowly in the presence of a surfactant template by gradual heating for 24 hours. By another method, the desilication can also take place in the absence of a surfactant template. In one embodiment, the desilication may occur in the absence of a surfactant template by stirring for 30 minutes. The filtrate is collected and mesopores are generated using a template mediated technique. In this way, the wasted desilicated source is utilized to produce the mesophases. Various heating processes or elements are contemplated. For example, the heating may be hydrothermal heating. In one or more embodiments, the hydrothermal heating may occur at a temperature of 50 to 150° C., or a temperature of 90 to 110° C. Furthermore, the duration of hydrothermal heating may range from 30 minutes to 24 hours.

(22) Various alkaline solutions are contemplated for the desilication. In one embodiment, the alkaline solution may comprise NaOH. In specific embodiments, the alkaline solution may comprise 0.01 to 0.2 Molarity (M) NaOH, 0.05 to 0.2 Molarity (M) NaOH, or 0.05 to 0.1 M NaOH. Without being bound by theory, it is surprisingly discovered that controlling the molarity of the NaOH is a parameter that impacts the ordered/disordered phase mesostructure of the zeolite composite catalyst.

(23) Referring again to FIG. 1, the method may comprise the step 40 of adjusting the pH of the dissolved zeolite solution. The adjusting of the pH is performed by an acidic solution. Various acids are contemplated. In one embodiment, the acidic solution comprises sulfuric acid. In one embodiment the pH is adjusted to 8 to 10.

(24) Next, various additional steps 50 may be utilized, for example, hydrothermal aging, filtering, washed drying, ion-exchanging and calcining the pH adjusted dissolved zeolite solution. The hydrothermal aging may involve maintaining the pH adjusted dissolved zeolite solution at a temperature of 75 to 125° C. for a duration of 12 to 48 hours. During hydrothermal aging, the soluble aluminosilicate species are hydrothermally condensed to form mesophases. The ion exchange may occur in the presence of a nitrate solution, for example and not by way of limitation, a solution comprising NH.sub.4NO.sub.3. Moreover, it is contemplated that the zeolite may be steamed at 600-750° C. for 4 hours. At this stage 60, the solid composite zeolite with ordered/disordered mesophase is formed.

(25) Referring to FIG. 1, the process may also include the step 70 of extruding the solid zeolite composite in the presence of a binder. A refractory binder or matrix is optionally utilized to facilitate fabrication of the catalyst, to provide strength, and to reduce fabrication costs. Suitable binders include inorganic oxides, such as one or more of alumina, magnesia, zirconia, chromia, titania, boric, phosphate, zinc oxide and silica. In one embodiment, the binder is an alumina based binder. One commercial embodiment of the alumina binder is Cataloid AP-3, obtained from Catalysts & Chemicals Industries Co., Ltd (CCIC), Japan. The zeolites may be mixed in dry powdered form with the alumina binder in aqueous form to yield a homogeneous mixture, thus ensuring homogeneous composition of the extrudates formed. In one or more embodiments, the ratio by weight of solid zeolite composite to binder is 4 to 1, or 3 to 1. The extrusion with binder step 70 may be conducted at a temperature of 100 to 150° C. for a duration of 30 minutes to 2 hours.

(26) Next, the process may comprise the step 70 of impregnating solid zeolite composite with one or more active metals prior to a calcining step. The one or more active metals are selected from the group consisting of molybdenum (Mo), platinum (Pt), rhenium (Re), nickel (Ni), and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the active metal may comprise 2 to 6% by weight molybdenum. Optionally, the zeolite composite may be dried after wet impregnation for at least 2 hours at 100° C.

(27) Referring again to FIG. 1, another calcining step 90 may be utilized to produce the zeolite composite catalyst, which is effective as a transalkylation catalyst 100. The calcining step may occur for 4 to 8 hours at a temperature of 400 to 500° C., or for 4 hours at a temperature of 400° C.

(28) Further as stated above, the present zeolite composite catalyst is a transalkylation catalyst suitable for converting C.sub.9+ alkyl aromatic hydrocarbons to a product stream comprising benzene, toluene, and xylene, particularly to commercially valuable xylenes. The feed stream to the conversion process generally comprises alkylaromatic hydrocarbons in the carbon number range C.sub.9 to C.sub.11+ that may include, for example, such hydrocarbons as propylbenzenes, ethylmethylbenzenes, tetramethylbenzenes, ethyldimethylbenzenes, diethylbenzenes, methylpropylbenzenes, and mixtures thereof. The heavy aromatics feed stream, characterized mainly by C.sub.9+ aromatics, permits effective transalkylation of light aromatics such as benzene and toluene with the heavier C.sub.9+ aromatics to yield additional C.sub.8 aromatics, such as xylenes. The heavy aromatics stream preferably comprises at least 90 wt. % C.sub.9 aromatics, and may be derived from the same or different known refinery and petrochemical processes, and may be recycled from the separation of the product from transalkylation.

(29) Referring to the embodiment of FIG. 2, the method of using the zeolite composite catalyst as a transalkylation catalyst may optionally include heating a feed 110 comprising C.sub.9+ alkylaromatic hydrocarbons from a feed source 105 with a heater unit 111. As shown, the heater unit 111 may be a heat exchanger which receives a heated stream 108, for example, a heated water stream to heat the feed 110 prior to delivery to the reactor system 113. Other methods of heating the feed are contemplated.

(30) The reactor system may include a single reactor 113 with zeolite composite catalyst used in transalkylation catalyst zone 115 as shown in FIG. 2, or may include multiple reactors or stages. The reactor 113 is depicted as a downflow 114 reactor but that is one of many possibilities. In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the reactor 113 has a fixed cylindrical bed of catalyst; however, other reaction configurations utilizing moving beds of catalyst or radial-flow reactors or fluidized bed may be employed. Prior to the feed being delivered, the zeolite composite catalyst in transalkylation catalyst zone 115 may be reduced, for example, reduced with hydrogen gas 112. In one embodiment, the zeolite composite catalyst is reduced by hydrogen gas 112 at a temperature of 350 to 450° C., or 400° C.

(31) Referring again to FIG. 2, the feed stream 110 contacts the reduced composite zeolite catalyst and hydrogen 112 in the transalkylation catalyst zone 115 of the reactor 113. Specifically, the feed 110 is transalkylated in the vapor phase and in the presence of hydrogen 112. The hydrogen 112 may be delivered with the feed stream 110 in an amount from 0.1 to 10 moles of hydrogen per mole of alkylaromatics. This ratio of hydrogen to alkylaromatics is also referred to as the hydrogen-to-hydrocarbon ratio. The transalkylation results in the production of a transalkylation effluent stream 116 comprising product hydrocarbons, specifically, hydrocarbons having mixed xylene content, as well as unconverted feed, toluene, and benzene. Various conditions are contemplated for the reactor 113. Specifically, the transalkylation catalyst zone 115 may include a temperature between 200° C. and 540° C. and moderately elevated pressures of 1.0 MPa to 5.0 MPa. The liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) is in the range of 1.0 hr.sup.−1 to 5.0 hr.sup.−1.

(32) As shown, the transalkylation effluent stream 116 may be cooled using a cooler 117. The cooler 117 may be a heat exchanger, condenser, or any other suitable cooling device familiar to the skilled person. As shown, the cooler 117 is a heat exchanger which includes a cooling stream 118. Next, the transalkylation effluent stream 116 may be fed to a stripper column 120, where C.sub.1-C.sub.5 and lighter hydrocarbons 122 are separated from the transalkylation effluent stream 116. Additionally, unreacted feed may be stripped from the transalkylation effluent stream 116.

(33) Referring to FIG. 2, the product 124 of the stripper column 120, which may be discharged from the bottom of the stripper column 120, may include a light recycle stream comprising benzene and toluene, a mixed C.sub.8 aromatics product, and a heavy recycle stream. These all may subsequently be separated in one or more reaction vessels 125, 127, 129. The mixed C.sub.8 aromatics product 128 can be sent for recovery of p-xylene 132 and other valuable isomers 134. The light recycle stream 126 may undergo benzene and toluene recovery 136 with a portion recycled to the transalkylation zone or the feed source 105. The heavy recycle stream 130 may contain substantially all of the C.sub.9 and heavier aromatics and may be partially or totally recycled to the transalkylation reaction zone, or delivered to the feed source 105 for recycle, or removed from the process for disposal or other processing.

EXAMPLES

(34) The described embodiments will be further clarified by the following examples.

(35) For demonstration purposes, the preparation of composite catalysts is provided as follows. The synthesis of Catalyst A, which includes an ordered hexagonal phase, is described in Example 1. The preparation of composite Catalyst B with disordered hexagonal mesophase is described in Example 2. The preparation of composite Catalyst C with ordered/disordered hexagonal mesophase is presented in Example 3. The performance of Catalyst A was compared with a physical mixture of two zeolites which are constituents of Catalyst A in Example 4. The performance of Catalyst A was compared with one of its constituents (zeolite beta) in Example 5. Example 6 described the preparation of desilicated zeolite beta 40 (Catalyst D). Preparation of metal-loaded composite catalysts (A-1, B-1, C-1, E-1, F-1 and G-1), is described in Example 7. The performance of Catalysts A-1, B-1, C-1, D, E-1, F-1 and G-1 is compared in Example 8. Finally, Example 9 describes the preparation of mesoporous zeolite beta composite catalyst using desilicated filtrate solution.

(36) The catalysts described in these examples are exemplary embodiments only, and are not intended to limit the general description of the composite catalyst covering this invention. In each example, the zeolite beta is HSZ-940NHA, available from Tosoh Corporation, Japan.

Example 1: Preparation of Hierarchical Catalyst A with Ordered Hexagonal Mesophase

(37) Two grams of zeolite beta (Si/Al molar ratio=40) was disintegrated using 0.45 M NaOH solution by gradual heating (without stirring) at 100° C. for 24 hours (h). The heating was carried out in the presence of CTAB (4.45 wt. %). The mixture was cooled down and then the pH was adjusted to 9.0 through the addition of dilute sulfuric acid (2 Normality (N) equivalents/liter). The mixture was then stirred for 24 hours (h) and then aged at 100° C. for 24 h to form a zeolite beta/MCM-41 composite. The solid product was filtered, washed thoroughly using distilled water, dried at 80° C. overnight, then calcined at 550° C. for 6 h to remove the surfactant. The composite material thus obtained was ion-exchanged three times with 0.05 M NH.sub.4NO.sub.3 solution at 80° C. for 2 h then calcined at 550° C. for 2 h. The resulting zeolite beta/MCM-41 composite is designated as Catalyst A.

(38) As shown in FIG. 3, the dissolution of zeolite beta using 0.45 M NaOH solution in the presence of CTAB leads to the formation of Catalyst A, a typical biporous composite with ordered hexagonal mesophase. In the low X-ray diffraction angle, an intense peak indexed at (100) along with intense higher order diffraction peaks indexed at (110) and (200), corresponding to MCM-41, were observed.

Example 2: Preparation of Composite Catalyst B with Ordered/Disordered Hexagonal Mesophase

(39) Two grams of zeolite beta (Si/Al ratio=40) was disintegrated using 0.1 M NaOH solution by gradual heating (without stirring) at 100° C. for 24 h. The heating was carried out in the presence of CTAB (4.45 wt. %). The mixture was cooled down and then the pH was adjusted to 9.0 through the addition of dilute sulfuric acid (2N). The mixture was then stirred for 24 h and then aged at 100° C. for 24 h to form a zeolite beta/MCM-41 composite. The solid product was filtered, washed thoroughly using distilled water, dried at 80° C. overnight, then calcined at 550° C. for 6 h to remove the surfactant. The composite material thus obtained was ion-exchanged three times with 0.05 M NH.sub.4NO.sub.3 solution at 80° C. for 2 h then calcined at 550° C. for 2 h. The resulting zeolite beta/MCM-41 composite is designated as Catalyst B.

(40) The dissolution of zeolite beta using 0.1 M NaOH solution in the presence of CTAB leads to the formation of mesopores with disordered hexagonal mesophase as shown in FIG. 4. The XRD pattern indicates the formation of mesoporous zeolite beta containing highly zeolite beta character along with a disordered hexagonal mesophase.

Example 3: Preparation of Composite Catalyst C with Ordered/Disordered Hexagonal Mesophase

(41) Two grams of zeolite beta (Si/Al ratio=40) was disintegrated using 0.2 M NaOH solution by gradual heating (without stirring) at 100° C. for 24 h. The heating was carried out in the presence of CTAB (4.45 wt. %). The mixture was cooled down and then the pH was adjusted to 9.0 through the addition of dilute sulfuric acid (2N). The mixture was then stirred for 24 h and then aged at 100° C. for 24 h to form a zeolite beta/MCM-41 composite. The solid product was filtered, washed thoroughly using distilled water, dried at 80° C. overnight, then calcined at 550° C. for 6 h to remove the surfactant. The composite material thus obtained was ion-exchanged three times with 0.05 M NH.sub.4NO.sub.3 solution at 80° C. for 2 h then calcined at 550° C. for 2 h. The resulting zeolite beta/MCM-41 composite is designated as Catalyst C. Table 1 includes selected properties of Catalyst C.

(42) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Catalyst C Data BET External Average Total t-plot Surface Surface Pore Pore Micropore Area Area Diameter Volume Volume Catalyst (m.sup.2/g) (m.sup.2/g) (Å) (cm.sup.3/g) (cm.sup.3/g) Zeolite 714 388 33.47 0.59 0.16 Beta/MCM-41 (Catalyst C)

(43) As shown in FIG. 5, the dissolution of zeolite beta using 0.2 M NaOH solution in the presence of CTAB leads to the formation of a less intense hexagonal phase containing ordered/disordered mesophase.

(44) Referring to FIGS. 6-8, catalyst A exhibits narrow mesopore size distribution (FIG. 6). However, the pore size distribution of disordered mesophase containing Catalyst B (FIG. 7) and the ordered/disordered mesophase Catalyst C shows that the pores are not uniformly distributed (FIG. 8) as compared to typical biporous composite.

Example 4: Comparison of Catalyst A with Physical Mixture of its Constituents

(45) The activity of Catalyst A for transalkylation reaction was tested in a bench top reaction system using a feedstock containing 1,2,4-trimethyl benzene and toluene in a 1:1 molar ratio. A catalyst made by physically mixing zeolite beta and MCM-41 in equal proportion (Catalyst PMBM) was also tested in order to demonstrate effectiveness of the composite catalyst for C.sub.9 conversion and xylene yield. The catalytic test consisted of loading a vertical reactor with 2.0 milliliters (ml) of the catalyst in the middle of the reactor together with inert alumina balls in the lower and upper parts of the reactor. The total volume of the reactor was 5 ml. The catalyst was activated and reduced under a 50 ml/min flow of pure hydrogen gas at 400° C. and was kept at this temperature for 2 hours. Then, the pressure of the reactor was increased to 20 bar and the flow of feedstock was started at 4.8 ml/h. The reaction was allowed to run 3 hours at this temperature before collecting the product sample.

(46) The reaction product was directly injected into an on-line gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector. The hydrocarbon separation was carried out on a 50 meter (m) long and 0.15 millimeters (mm) diameter column under temperature programmed conditions. The components were separated according to their boiling points. The components were identified using a calibration that was accomplished using a standard hydrocarbon mixture sample having components of a known composition. The composition of the gaseous product was analyzed off-line by a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector and thermal conductivity detector. The gaseous hydrocarbons and hydrogen were analyzed by a 50 m long capillary column.

(47) From the data shown in Table 2 as follows, Catalyst A shows a substantially higher yield of xylenes as compared to the physical mixture of zeolite beta and MCM-41 (Catalyst PMBM) under identical process conditions. These results indicate that the composite catalyst containing zeolite beta and MCM-41 possesses a unique structure which performs differently from a mere mixture of its constituents.

(48) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Performance Comparison of Catalyst A with Physical Mixture of its Constituents Catalyst Product Analysis A PMBM Alkanes 0.66 1.57 Benzene 5.58 2.85 Toluene 39.48 20.08 EB 0.33 0.00 p-Xylene 9.35 6.27 m-Xylene 20.86 13.75 o-Xylene 9.09 6.23 135-TMB 3.66 8.69 124-TMB 8.74 23.59 123-TMB 1.24 4.02 1245-TeMB 0.39 4.85 1235-TeMB 0.51 6.45 1234-TeMB 0.11 1.65 124-TMB Conversion (wt. %) 84.1 57.1 Xylenes Yield (wt. %) 39.3 26.3

Example 5: Comparison of Catalyst A with Zeolite Beta

(49) The activity of Catalyst A for transalkylation reaction was tested in a bench top reactor using industrial heavy reformate feedstock. A sample of zeolite beta was also tested in order to demonstrate effectiveness of the composite catalyst for C.sub.9 conversion and xylene yield. The procedure used for determination of catalytic activity was same as described in Example 4, expect for the feedstock which was industrial heavy reformate feedstock. The composition of the heavy reformate is presented in Table 3.

(50) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Heavy Reformate Composition Major Hydrocarbons Amount (wt. %) Isopropyl benzene 1.8 n-Propyl-benzene 4.4 1-Methyl, 3-ethyl benzene 18.5 1-Methyl, 4-ethyl benzene 9.1 1,3,5-trimethyl benzene 10.1 1-Methyl, 2-ethyl benzene 6.5 1,2,4-trimethyl benzene 39.1 1,2,3-trimethyl benzene 6.6 Total C.sub.9 Components 96.1 Total C.sub.10 Components 3.9

(51) From the product compositional data shown in Table 4, Catalyst A provided higher yield of xylenes compared to zeolite beta. The data also shows higher percent conversion of individual C.sub.9 hydrocarbons, especially the major ones listed in Table 3.

(52) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Performance Comparison of Catalyst A with Zeolite Beta Catalyst Product Analysis Zeolite Beta A Light Alkanes 1.69 1.63 Benzene 1.01 1.75 Toluene 9.00 12.99 EB 2.39 2.50 p-Xylene 5.17 7.13 m-Xylene 11.13 15.72 o-Xylene 4.81 6.75 135 TMB 11.35 8.63 124 TMB 24.37 18.89 123 TMB 3.14 2.34 1M2EB 1.60 1.29 1M3EB 2.76 2.19 1M4EB 7.04 5.63 1245 TeMB 2.74 1.95 1235 TeMB 2.99 2.27 1234 TeMB 0.68 0.45 DEBs 4.27 5.70 Other C10+ 3.85 2.19 C.sub.9+ Conversion (wt. %) 56.8 66.7 Xylenes Yield (wt. %) 21.1 29.6

Example 6—Preparation of Desilicated Zeolite Beta 40 (Catalyst D)

(53) Two grams of zeolite beta (Si/Al molar ratio=40) was desilicated using 0.2 M NaOH solution by stirring at 65° C. for 30 min. The mixture was cooled down and the solid product was filtered, washed thoroughly using distilled water, and dried at 80° C. overnight. The material thus obtained was ion-exchanged three times with 0.05-M NH.sub.4NO.sub.3 solution at 80° C. for 2 h then calcined at 550° C. for 2 h. The resulting desilicated zeolite is designated as Catalyst D.

Example 7—Preparation of Metal-Loaded (Pt, Mo) Composite Catalysts

(54) From the Examples 1-3, the composite catalyst A was found to be active for transalkylation. In order to improve the performance, the catalysts with hexagonally ordered and disordered pore-structures were prepared and active metal(s) were loaded on composite Catalysts A, B and C.

(55) Examples of such molybdenum-loaded composite catalysts are designated as Catalyst A-1 (4.0 wt. % Mo), B-1 (4.0 wt. % Mo), and C-1 (4.0 wt. % Mo). The activity was compared with conventional desilicated Zeolite Beta 40 (Catalyst D). A catalyst loaded with platinum on Catalyst A is designated as Catalyst E-1 (2.0 wt. % Pt). A catalyst loaded with molybdenum on Catalyst A is designated as Catalyst F-1 (2.0 wt. % Mo). A catalyst loaded with platinum and molybdenum on Catalyst A is designated as Catalyst G-1 (1.5 wt. % Mo+0.5 wt. % Pt). The incipient wetness impregnation method was applied for metal-loading and its procedure is summarized as follows:

(56) Step 1: One gram of catalyst A was soaked in 1.72 grams (g) of deionized water for pore volume saturation; Step 2: 0.0397 g of tetraamine platinum nitrate was dissolved in 1.72 g of deionized water; Step 3: One gram of catalyst A was then added and homogeneously mixed with a dissolved platinum or molybdenum solution; and Step 4: The sample was dried overnight at 100° C. followed by calcination at 400° C. for four hours (heating rate was 5° C./min).

(57) In case of bimetallic impregnation, initially 1.5 wt. % Mo was impregnated, dried and then 0.5 wt. % Pt was impregnated. Then the sample was calcined at 400° C. for four hours. The heating rate was 5° C./min.

Example 8—Performance Comparison of Metal-Loaded Catalysts A-1, B-1, C-1, E-1, F-1 and G-1 with Desilicated Catalyst D

(58) The activity of catalysts for transalkylation reaction was tested in a bench top reaction system using industrial heavy reformate feedstock. The procedure used for determination of catalytic activity was the same as described in Example 4.

(59) From the product compositional data shown in Table 5 it can be noticed that impregnation of active metal(s) resulted in significant improvement, especially in selectivity towards xylenes. The composition of product obtained over 2% Mo (Catalyst F-1) shows marked reduction in light hydrocarbon yield. It also shows higher TMB conversion and thus improved xylene yield (29.5 wt. %).

(60) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Performance Comparison of Metal-Loaded Catalysts A-1, B-1, C-1, E-1, F-1 and G-1 with desilicated Catalyst D Catalyst Catalyst Catalyst Catalyst Catalyst Catalyst Catalyst D A-1 B-1 C-1 E-1 F-1 G-1 Product Composition (wt. %) Light Hydrocarbons 7.00 1.63 2.95 2.14 12.76 1.04 5.89 Benzene 1.07 1.75 1.02 1.31 0.83 1.13 1.01 Toluene 9.83 12.99 10.80 13.56 8.34 11.01 8.68 Ethylbenzene 1.54 2.50 1.25 0.78 0.72 1.54 0.66 p-xylene 4.97 7.13 6.25 6.71 4.91 6.27 6.19 m-xylene 15.35 15.72 16.86 19.34 14.57 16.66 15.64 o-xylene 5.93 6.75 7.02 7.64 5.69 6.54 6.33 1-Methyl-2-ethylbenzene 0.65 1.29 1.04 1.50 0.86 0.39 0.88 1-Methyl-3-ethylbenzene 4.20 2.19 3.32 1.79 3.15 3.70 1.90 1-Methyl-4-ethylbenzene 1.88 5.63 1.88 1.02 1.42 2.10 1.07 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 3.12 2.34 2.75 2.85 3.30 1.66 2.93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 21.64 18.89 20.37 20.82 23.30 21.01 21.98 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.05 8.63 8.14 7.43 9.25 7.58 7.92 1,2-Diethylbenzene 2.54 3.10 0.63 0.90 0.00 1.01 0.96 1,3-Diethylbenzene 2.50 2.60 2.23 1.29 0.00 0.22 0.61 1,2,3,4-Tetramethylbenzene 0.98 0.45 1.10 1.11 0.90 0.26 1.28 1,2,3,5-Tetramethylbenzene 4.02 2.27 4.93 4.58 3.81 4.83 5.71 1,2,4,5-Tetramethylbenzene 1.20 2.74 2.98 2.77 2.91 2.96 3.43 Others (C.sub.10+ aromatics) 2.53 2.19 4.49 2.46 3.27 10.09 6.93 Conversion (wt. %) Trimethylbenzenes 45.88 49.96 50.22 45.88 35.75 45.79 41.16 Methylethylbenzenes 76.62 78.32 85.03 76.62 84.06 81.85 88.71 C.sub.9+ 45.69 46.14 51.48 45.69 47.83 44.19 44.40 Xylenes Yield (wt. %) 26.25 30.14 33.69 26.25 25.18 29.47 28.16 Xylenes Selectivity (%) 57.45 65.32 65.44 57.45 52.64 66.69 63.42

Example 9: Preparation of Mesoporous Zeolite Beta Composite Catalyst Using Desilicated Filtrate Solution

(61) Zeolite beta was desilicated by stirring with 60 mL of 0.2 M NaOH solution at 65° C. for 30 min. The solid product was filtered, washed thoroughly using distilled water, dried and ion-exchanged and calcined at 500° C. for 2 h.

(62) The filtrate was collected and used for mesostructure transformation, in the presence of CTAB (2-8 wt. %). The mixture was cooled down and then the pH of the mixture was adjusted to 9.0 through the addition of dilute sulfuric acid (2N). The mixture was then stirred for 24 h and then aged at 100° C. for 24 h to form a hierarchical zeolite beta. The solid product was filtered, washed thoroughly using distilled water, dried at 80° C. overnight, then calcined at 550° C. for 6 h to remove the surfactant. The composite material thus obtained was ion-exchanged three times with 0.05 M NH.sub.4NO.sub.3 solution at 80° C. for 2 h then calcined at 550° C. for 2 h.

(63) It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the described embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter. Thus, it is intended that the specification cover the modifications and variations of the various described embodiments provided such modifications and variations come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.